Skip to content

Chapter I: Preface

Text size

In the execution of the present task (which I took over about two years ago from hands worthier than mine, but then more occupied) some difficulties of necessity occurred which did not present themselves to myself when I undertook the volume of Elizabethan Literature, or to my immediate predecessor in grappling with the period between 1660 and 1780.

The most obvious and serious of these was the question, "What should be done with living authors?" Independently of certain perils of selection and exclusion, of proportion and of freedom of speech, I believe it will be recognised by every one who has ever attempted it, that to mix estimates of work which is done and of work which is unfinished is to the last degree unsatisfactory. I therefore resolved to include no living writer, except Mr. Ruskin, in this volume for the purpose of detailed criticism, though some may be now and then mentioned in passing.

Even with this limitation the task remained a rather formidable one. Those who are least disposed to overvalue literary work in proportion as it approaches their own time will still acknowledge that the last hundred and fifteen years are fuller furnished than either of the periods of not very dissimilar length which have been already dealt with. The proportion of names of the first, or of a very high second class, is distinctly larger than in the eighteenth century; the bulk of literary production is infinitely greater than in the Elizabethan time. Further, save in regard to the earliest subsections of this period, Time has not performed his office, beneficent to the reader but more beneficent to the historian, of sifting and riddling out writers whom it is no longer necessary to consider, save in a spirit of adventurous or affectionate antiquarianism. I must ask the reader to believe me when I say that many who do not appear here at all, or who are dismissed in a few lines, have yet been the subjects of careful reading on my part. If some exclusions (not due to mere oversight) appear arbitrary or unjust, I would urge that this is not a Dictionary of Authors, nor a Catalogue of Books, but a History of Literature; and that to mention everybody is as impossible as to say everything. As I have revised the sheets the old query has recurred to myself only too often, and sometimes in reference to very favourite books and authors of my own. Where, it may be asked, is Kenelm Digby and the _Broad Stone of Honour_? Where Sir Richard Burton (as great a contrast to Digby as can well be imagined)? Where Laurence Oliphant, who, but the other day, seemed to many clever men the cleverest man they knew? Where John Foster, who provided food for the thoughtful public two generations ago? Where Greville of the caustic diaries, and his editor (latest deceased) Mr. Reeve, and Crabb Robinson, and many others? Some of these and others are really _neiges d'antan_; some baffle the historian in miniature by being rebels to brief and exact characterisation; some, nay many, are simply crowded out.

I must also ask pardon for having exercised apparently arbitrary discretion in alternately separating the work of the same writer under different chapter-headings, and grouping it with a certain disregard of the strict limits of the chapter-heading itself. I think I shall obtain this pardon from those who remember the advantage obtainable from a connected view of the progress of distinct literary kinds, and that, sometimes not to be foregone, of considering the whole work of certain writers together.

To provide room for the greater press of material, it was necessary to make some slight changes of omission in the scheme of the earlier volumes. The opportunity of considerable gain was suggested in the department of extract--which obviously became less necessary in the case of authors many of whom are familiar, and hardly any accessible with real difficulty. Nor did it seem necessary to take up room with the bibliographical index, the utility of which in my Elizabethan volume I was glad to find almost universally recognised. This would have had to be greatly more voluminous here; and it was much less necessary. With a very few exceptions, all the writers here included are either kept in print, or can be obtained without much trouble at the second-hand bookshops.

To what has thus been said as to the principles of arrangement it cannot be necessary to add very much as to the principles of criticism. They are the same as those which I have always endeavoured to maintain--that is to say, I have attempted to preserve a perfectly independent, and, as far as possible, a rationally uniform judgment, taking account of none but literary characteristics, but taking account of all characteristics that are literary. It may be, and it probably is, more and more difficult to take achromatic views of literature as it becomes more and more modern; it is certainly more difficult to get this achromatic character, even where it exists, acknowledged by contemporaries. But it has at least been my constant effort to attain it.

In the circumstances, and with a view to avoid not merely repetition but confusion and dislocation in the body of the book, I have thought it better to make the concluding chapter one of considerably greater length than the corresponding part of the Elizabethan volume, and to reserve for it the greater part of what may be called connecting and comprehensive criticism. In this will be found what may be not improperly described from one point of view as the opening of the case, and from another as its summing up--the evidence which justifies both being contained in the earlier chapters.

It is perhaps not improper to add that the completion of this book has been made a little difficult by the incidence of new duties, not in themselves unconnected with its subject. But I have done my best to prevent or supply oversight.

CONTENTS

CHAPTER I

THE END OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY

PAGE

The Starting-point--Cowper--Crabbe--Blake--Burns--Minor
Poets--The Political Satirists--Gifford--Mathias--Dr. Moore,
etc.--Paine--Godwin--Holcroft--Beckford, etc.--Mrs.
Radcliffe and "Monk" Lewis--Hannah More--Gilpin 1

CHAPTER II

THE NEW POETRY

Wordsworth--Coleridge--Southey--Scott--Byron--Shelley--Keats--
Rogers--Campbell--Moore--Leigh Hunt--Hogg--Landor--Minor
Poets born before Tennyson--Beddoes--Sir Henry Taylor--Mrs.
Hemans and L, E. L.--Hood and Praed 49

CHAPTER III

THE NEW FICTION

Interval--Maturin--Miss Edgeworth--Miss Austen--The _Waverley
Novels_--Hook--Bulwer--Dickens--Thackeray--Marryat--Lever--Minor
Naval Novelists--Disraeli--Peacock--Borrow--Miss
Martineau--Miss Mitford 125

CHAPTER IV

THE DEVELOPMENT OF PERIODICALS.

New Periodicals at the beginning of the
Century--Cobbett--The _Edinburgh Review_--Jeffrey--Sydney
Smith--The _Quarterly_--_Blackwood's_ and the _London
Magazines_--Lamb--Hazlitt--Wilson--Lockhart--De
Quincey--Leigh Hunt--Hartley Coleridge--Maginn and
_Fraser_--Sterling and the Sterling Club--Edward
FitzGerald--Barham 166

CHAPTER V

THE HISTORIANS OF THE CENTURY

Occasional
Historians--Hallam--Roscoe--Mitford--Lingard--Turner--
Palgrave--The Tytlers--Alison--Milman--Grote and
Thirlwall--Arnold--Macaulay--Carlyle--Minor
Figures--Buckle--Kinglake--Freeman and Green--Froude 211

CHAPTER VI

THE SECOND POETICAL PERIOD

Tennyson--Mr. and Mrs. Browning--Matthew Arnold--The
Prae-Raphaelite Movement--Rossetti--Miss
Rossetti--O'Shaughnessy--Thomson--Minor Poets--Lord
Houghton--Aytoun--The Spasmodics--Minor
Poets--Clough--Locker--The Earl of Lytton--Humorous
Verse-Writers--Poetesses 253

CHAPTER VII

THE NOVEL SINCE 1850

Changes in the Novel--Miss Bronte--George Eliot--Charles
Kingsley--The Trollopes--Reade--Minor Novelists--Stevenson 317

CHAPTER VIII

PHILOSOPHY AND THEOLOGY

Limits of this and following Chapters--Bentham--
Mackintosh--The Mills--Hamilton and the Hamiltonians--
Mansel--Other Philosophers--Jurisprudents:
Austin, Maine, Stephen--Political Economists and
Malthus--The Oxford Movement--Pusey--Keble--Newman--The
Scottish Disruption--Chalmers--Irving--Other
Divines--Maurice--Robertson 342

CHAPTER IX

LATER JOURNALISM AND CRITICISM IN ART AND LETTERS

Changes in Periodicals--The _Saturday Review_--Critics of
the middle of the Century--Helps--Matthew Arnold in
Prose--Mr. Ruskin--Jefferies--Pater--Symonds--Minto 378

CHAPTER X

SCHOLARSHIP AND SCIENCE

Increasing Difficulty of
Selection--Porson--Conington--Munro--Sellar--Robertson
Smith--Davy--Mrs. Somerville--Other Scientific Writers--
Darwin--_Vestiges of Creation_--Hugh Miller--Huxley 404

CHAPTER XI

DRAMA

Weakness of this department throughout--O'Keefe--Joanna
Baillie--Knowles--Bulwer--Planche 417

CHAPTER XII

CONCLUSION

Survey and Analysis of the Period in the several
divisions--Revolutions in Style--The present state of
Literature 425

INDEX 471

Comments

Log in to leave a comment.

A History of Nineteenth Century Literature (1780-1895)Chapter I: Preface

0%5 min left in chapter