Chapter II: Appendix: Translators' Notes

_The Mechanico-physiological Theory of Evolution_, (_Mechanisch-Physiologische Theorie der Abstammungslehre_), by Carl von Naegeli, was published in Munich and Leipsic in 1884 in a large octavo volume of 822 pages, including two large appendices. The _Abstammungslehre_ proper, including the summary, occupies 552 pages, and constitutes, in its way, one of the most important contributions to theoretical biology. It is difficult to understand how a work of so much consequence should have received such comparatively small notice in this country, especially as Naegeli's theories seemed calculated by nature to appeal much more strongly to American students than do, for instance, those of Weismann, who has been studied ten times as much as Naegeli. This is doubtless due, in part, to the fact that we have had no English translation of Naegeli's work, a circumstance much to be regretted.

The foregoing translation of the summary from _Abstammungslehre_ goes but a small way toward making Naegeli's theories accessible to English-reading students, but it will, at least, be better than nothing. The work covers a great range of subjects, all, however, having a certain relationship to each other. In the main part of the book the discussion is presented in the following order: (1) Idioplasm as bearer of the inheritable determinants; (2) Spontaneous generation; (3) Causes of variation; (4) Determinants and visible characters, in which the origin and function of the determinants is presented; (5) Variety, race, "nutrition variety," heredity and variation; (6) Criticism of the Darwinian theory of natural selection, in which the author urges seven objections to that theory; (7) Laws of evolution of the plant kingdom; (8) Alternation of generations from the standpoint of phylogeny; (9) Morphology and classification as phylogenetic sciences; (10) A comprehensive summary of the whole work, a translation of which is given in the foregoing pages.

In the first part of the work Naegeli sets forth his micellar theory of the structure of organized bodies. This is one of his most important contributions to science. Until recent years it has been the only theory given in botanical text-books. At the present time its only competitor is Strasburger's lamellar theory, and even this has not superseded Naegeli's work to any great degree.

The reader who may not be familiar with the micellar theory will find the general idea from the following brief sketch adapted from Vines's _Plant Physiology_:

"Naegeli's micellar theory was developed from his study of
organized bodies, especially of cell walls and starch grains.
From the behavior of organized substance toward water absorbed
by it, he concluded that water does not penetrate into the
micellae, but only among them, thus merely separating them more
from each other. He reasoned that if water should penetrate into
the micella, its structure would be disintegrated. Hence he
argued that organized bodies consist of solid micellae, which,
with their respective films of water, are held together by: (1)
The attraction of the micellae for each other, which varies
inversely as the square of the distance. (2) The attraction of
the micellae for water, which varies inversely as some higher
power of the distance. (3) The force which holds together the
ultimate chemical molecules of which each micella consists.

"Since the swelling up of organized bodies does not take place
equally in all three dimensions of space, and on account of
their double refraction, Naegeli inferred that in form the
micellae are crystals, probably parallelopipedal, with
rectangular or rhomboidal bases."

The law that "bodies attract each other with a force which varies inversely as the square of the distance," has been proven only in its application to the heavenly bodies. Naegeli has applied this law to molecules, unsupported, however, by any evidence other than that of analogy. On the other hand, there is evidence that molecules do not invariably act according to this law.

Spontaneous generation (p. 4) was an important item in Naegeli's doctrine, and might almost be said to be fundamental to it, although it is not really necessary to the internal perfecting principle, which may be regarded as the chief feature of the Mechanico-Physiological Theory. Up to 1865 Naegeli believed in the spontaneous origin of many fungi, and thought that it could be demonstrated. He was obliged to abandon the experimental evidence, but to the close of his life held the views of abiogenesis presented in the accompanying translation.

The characteristic and most interesting feature of the Mechanico-Physiological Theory is certainly Naegeli's conception of an automatic perfecting principle (_Autonome Vervollkommnung_). This conception may be briefly outlined as follows:

1. The essential part of the reproductive plasm, termed idioplasm, since it divides and passes over from generation to generation, in higher as well as in lower organisms, has a continuous or "immortal" existence.[I]

[I] Naegeli's idioplasm corresponds in many respects, though by
no means in all, to Weismann's germ-plasm. Weismann's idea of
continuity or "immortality," which has been so widely noticed,
is set forth with equal clearness, though with less emphasis, by
Naegeli.

2. During this continuous life the idioplasm goes through a development of its own, just as an individual organism goes through a certain cycle of development during its individual life. This development consists in a constantly increasing complexity of structure and differentiation of function.

3. This development is automatic, resulting from internal forces or movements, (_Vervollkommnungs-bewegungen_).

4. As a result of the increasing complexity of structure in the idioplasm the entire organism, which in each generation rearises therefrom, becomes, from generation to generation, more and more complex with greater and greater differentiation of function. Thus the progression of the idioplasm controls the phylogeny of the race. It marks out the course of evolution.

5. Since, according to Naegeli, new life with new idioplasms, may arise wherever and whenever the necessary conditions combine, the present organic world is not made up from branchings of a single original idioplasm, but each race or group may have its own specific idioplasm; and, since this has its own characteristic structure and its own specific internal perfecting forces, it passes through its own peculiar evolution, carrying with it its own depending race of organisms.

The fact that animals and plants at the present time show such various degrees of organization is also accounted for on the last supposition, for those of lowlier organization are merely of more recent origin and have not progressed so far in idioplasmic development.

This automatic perfecting principle has been the mark of much criticism. Some have confounded it with the mystical _nisus formativus_, or formative principle of preceding theorists. But, as Weismann remarks, Naegeli's phyletic force is conceived as a thoroughly scientific mechanical principle. Naegeli has simply made application in the organic world of the principle of entropy, as stated in the mechanical theory of heat. Naegeli himself also compares his internal perfecting principle to mechanical inertia. He says, "the force of evolution once started in a given direction, tends to continue in the same direction. This constitutes the law of inertia in the organic world."

* * * * *

Two other matters remain to be noticed. The first of these is Naegeli's use of the German word _Anlage_. We have been unable to give a perfectly satisfactory translation of this word in its technical meaning. We have received some comfort, though but little help, from the experience of the translators of similar works. Selmar Schoenland, in translating from Weismann, renders it variously as "germ," "germ of structure," "germ (of Naegeli)," "germ of Naegeli," "Naegeli's preformed germ of structure," "preformed germs," "tendency." Another translator renders the word as "constitutional element." The translation, "determinant," which we have selected is an appropriation of an analogous but not absolutely identical technical term from Weismann's _Germinal Selection_. The use of the word in this connection is open to the objection that it has previously been used technically for a somewhat different idea by another author. M. C. Potter, in his translation of Warming's _Systematic Botany_, following Dr. E. L. Mark, renders the word _Anlage_ as "fundament." Dr. H. C. Porter, in his translation of the _Bonn Text-Book of Botany_, renders the same word as "rudiment."

In general the word Anlage means beginning, plan, disposition to anything, and hence involves the ideas of origin, organization and tendency. Sanders defines the word in one of its meanings as: "The act of planning or beginning anything; the act of laying the foundation of any work intended to be carried on toward completion, in order that from the beginning made, a definite thing may be developed or may develop itself"; (_i.e._, to determine, in the sense of limiting to a particular purpose or direction, hence determinant). "Also, the thing begun or planned, considered as the basis and germ of the further development of that which has already originated."

In its restricted use as applied to organisms it would mean "germ," in the sense of embryonic starting point. More specifically, it is a portion of plastic, organized substance, functioning as an individual and containing potentially an elemental organ plus a formative power. In Naegeli's own words, "There exists an essential difference between the substance of a mature organism which does not possess the capability of further development, and the substance of an egg, which does possess this capability. By virtue of this difference the egg-substance is characterized as the _Anlage_, or germ of the mature organism. All characteristics of the adult condition are potentially contained in the ovum."

Naegeli was not the first to assume the existence of a unit of organization intermediate between the molecule and the cell. E. B. Wilson, in his _The Cell in Inheritance and Development_, states the case as follows:

"That the cell consists of more elementary units of
organization, is indicated by _a priori_ evidence so cogent as
to have driven many of the foremost leaders of biological
thought into the belief that such units must exist, whether or
not the microscope reveals them to view. The modern conception
of ultra-cellular units, ranking between the molecule and the
cell, was first definitely suggested by Bruecke in 1861.

"This idea of ultra-cellular units is common to most
morphologists and physiologists. We are compelled by the most
stringent evidence to admit that the ultimate basis of living
matter is not a single chemical substance, but a mixture of many
substances that are self-perpetuating without their loss of
specific character."[J]

[J] For a fuller discussion of the notion of these hypothetical
units of organic existence, see Weismann's Germinal Selection,
(Open Court Publishing Co., Chicago, 1896), especially the foot
note, page 230.

Naegeli's _Laws of Evolution_ are also worth special notice. As stated in the body of _Abstammungslehre_ they are as follows:

1. Asexual reproductive cells which arise by division, remain united and become tissue cells.

2. Asexual reproductive cells which arise by budding, instead of separating, become cell branches or branched cell threads.

3. Reproductive cells which arise by free cell formation become bodies which form a part of the cell contents.

4. Parts of a plant which arise by differentiation lie side by side and form a body of web-like or tissue-like structure.

5. A definite and previously limited growth continues, or a definite formation of parts of an ontogeny which has previously been present but once, is repeated. (Ampliation.)

6. The parts of an ontogeny become dissimilar, since the functions which were previously united become differentiated and since new dissimilar functions are produced in the various parts. This differentiation is either one of space between the parts of the ontogeny that appear near each other, or one of time between those that are derived from each other.

7. Parts which have become dissimilar by differentiation undergo a reduction, in which the intermediate forms are suppressed and at last only the qualitatively dissimilar forms with qualitatively dissimilar functions remain.

8. The environment in which plants live operates in different ways, directly as a stimulus or indirectly as a felt necessity and by this means lends to their forms and activities a definite expression of time and place, and thus brings about different adaptations. These become permanent through heredity, but are again gradually lost if other adaptations supersede them.

Laws 1 to 4 may be expressed as one--the law of combination: Similar parts that are wholly or partly separated have the tendency to unite more and more completely and intimately into one continuous tissue.

The laws of ampliation (5), differentiation (6), and reduction (7), may be summarized in one as follows: While increasing in size the similar parts of an ontogeny become internally dissimilar and the dissimilarity increases as the transition forms of the dissimilar parts vanish. Hence only the extreme forms remain.

* * * * *

It may also interest the reader to know that Naegeli was the first to propose the general theory of cell formation as accepted at the present day.

BRIEF STATEMENT OF THE WORK OF THE OPEN COURT PUBLISHING COMPANY

If one asked for a brief description of the work of the Open Court Company, one would probably get the answer that the Company publishes books and articles on Science, Religion, and Philosophy. That is not quite exact; for that describes the ideal to which the Open Court Company is continually striving rather than the actual work it is doing. The ideal is Religion on a firm basis of Science, a Science of Philosophy, and a Philosophy of Science: the only path which can lead to this great ideal synthesis is the detailed and careful study of sciences, religions, and philosophies.

It was this ideal that prompted the late Mr. Edward Carl Hegeler of La Salle, Illinois, in the United States of America, to found a Company to publish books with the object of establishing ethics and religion upon a scientific basis. Such ideals are as old as philosophy itself. Among modern philosophies, that founded by Comte tried, probably in the most explicit fashion of all, to found a religion on the basis of positive science; and at one time it appeared likely to have a lasting success. But it is now quite plain that no philosophy which hopes to be permanent can neglect history or put itself into uncritical opposition to the systems that have for centuries expressed some of the dearest and highest aspirations of mankind. It is unprejudiced and fearless historical and critical investigation--non-sectarian in the widest sense--in both religion, science, and philosophy, that must go before any satisfactory synthesis. This is a great part of the work of the Open Court Company.

Let us consider what non-sectarianism means. We cannot, for example, isolate a single domain of science in a particular country and at a particular time--say, mechanics in England in the eighteenth century--and hope to make of it a thoroughly complete object of study. In natural science, for example, we make conventional divisions simply with the object of saving labor when dealing with the huge mass of material that experience offers. But the narrowest specialist knows that all workers in science, religion, and philosophy seek the Truth; and that the Truth is bounded neither by space nor by time nor by man-made divisions. A man may rightly conclude that he stands little chance of finding out very much of the Truth, and so he may voluntarily limit his view to a certain roughly defined domain of facts and thoughts, and become, for example, what is called a "biologist," a "physicist," a "higher critic," or, if he thinks that he may discover rather more of the Truth, a "philosopher."

And let us carry a clear understanding of a lofty aim into religion as well. It is our duty, as rational beings, to be non-sectarian. It is not a merit to allow ignorance to blind us to the glimpses of Truth that we sometimes get from prophets, poets, and priests of other religions and other philosophies than our own. If we think that there is more truth or sacredness in our own, let us use every means to make this sacredness or this truth appear evident to others. But, in justice, let us also fearlessly discuss other religions and philosophies, and discover their greater merits, if any, as compared with our own. If, after careful investigation, we arrive at the belief in the truth or falsehood of anything in these religions or philosophies, let us state our grounds for believing so in the fullest possible way. Only by so doing can we fulfil the duties of being true to ourselves and helpful to others.

Sometimes the work of a critic is said to be "merely destructive." This idea rests on a most harmful misunderstanding. Criticism consists not only in the pointing out of error, but in the pointing out of truth as well. Error is simply a psychological condition of blindness to the truth; and the discovery of errors committed by other people or ourselves is not--as many superficial people like to say--the pulling down of a structure already raised, unless an error can be called a structure which is built out of the fictions of our imagination which have no objective existence. Criticism often enables us to discover more of the Truth, and nobody can do more than _discover_ Truth: nobody _creates_ Truth, any more than Columbus created America.

Nowadays all intelligent men and women agree that all knowledge must be subjected to criticism, and the best men and women act on these beliefs. The books and magazines published by the Open Court Company are intended to help these men and women.

We will dwell a little longer on the subject of religion, because it is in religion that the majority of us have the one region of ideals above our bodily needs. It is rare, though of course not unknown, that Science or Philosophy satisfies the spiritual needs--the purest of human cravings. Nowadays, most of us realize that an anti-scientific attitude of religion is impossible. If there were an opposition between "science" and "religion," there would be no question as to which side would be victorious. More particularly during the last seventy years, "religion," conscious of the opposition which a rather crude doctrine which was called "science" had towards it, has been gradually, and often somewhat ludicrously, trying to bring itself more into conformity with that "science." The result is painful to the student of human nature; though it has its amusing sides, just as had the militant denial, on the part of those who were "on the side of the angels" about fifty years ago, of certain deductions from facts. What is called a "conflict between religion and science" always has ended in a victory for "science" and an agnosticism which ousted religion. And thus many see that it is desirable that the matured results of science should enter into the fabric of our religious convictions. For the realization of this purpose, the Open Court Company publishes two periodicals, _The Monist_, a quarterly magazine devoted to the philosophy of science, and _The Open Court_, an illustrated monthly devoted to the science of religion and the religion of science. In addition, the Open Court Company publishes books that directly or indirectly advance its aim--books on Philosophy, which, in contrast with the old metaphysicism, lay the foundations of a philosophy of science; books on the history of philosophies; books on mathematics and other lines of thought which are indispensable for a rational and scientific conception of the world; books that have a bearing on the doctrine of Evolution; books on the history of Religions, especially on the development of Christianity and on Higher Criticism; and books on Comparative Religion, on Psychology, on Education, and on Ethics. Above all, in all the works careful, sympathetic, and scholarly criticism is aimed at. Criticism is the joint result of love of Truth and independence of thought; rightly understood, it is not only a preliminary to a work of synthesis, but it is part of synthesis itself. No synthesis, in fact, is more than a discovery of Truth: from past history we know that syntheses have often blinded men to the Truth, though that was naturally not their intention.

On the subject of independence of thought it may be proper shortly to refer to the work of Dr. Paul Carus, who has been, since the end of 1887, closely associated with the Open Court Company and its publications. Only two things need be said here. In the first place, it was owing to the need he felt for keeping his independence of thought that he resigned a post in Germany and came, first to England and then to America. In the second place, his views, which are also, broadly speaking, the views for which the Open Court Company works, may be characterized both as monism and positivism, though his philosophy differs considerably from Haeckel's monism, which is practically materialism, and even more so from the French positivism of Comte and from agnosticism, its English equivalent. In his philosophy, _form_ plays the most important part. Form is the significant feature of both objective existence and subjective thought. Matter and energy only denote reality, but form characterizes quality. Science traces form, and the nature of all things, the human character included, is constituted by form. In the formal sciences again, that which is the core of their usefulness as general propositions is the character of _anyness_, the use of which justifies the method of generalization. Here lies the root of the kinship of Dr. Carus's philosophy with modern logic, and allows him to reconstruct the old artistic and religious ideas upon a new and modern ground. In this sense, he himself has characterized his philosophy as a _philosophy of form_.

A Partial List of Books in the
OPEN COURT SCIENCE SERIES

PROBLEMS OF SCIENCE
BY FEDERIGO ENRIQUES

Authorized translation by Katherine Royce, with an introduction
by Josiah Royce. =Pp. 375. Price, $2.50.=

"The end for which we ought to strive today is a scientific education, which shall enable the workers in any field whatsoever to understand better how the object of their own research is subordinated to more general problems."

The author is professor of projective geometry and geometric drawing in the University of Bologna, and is one of the most conspicuous of contemporary Italian scientists.

The Primary Factors of Organic Evolution By E. D. Cope

=Illustrated. Cloth, $2.00 net=

The Soul of Man By Paul Carus

An investigation of the facts of physiological and experimental
psychology. =Illustrated. Cloth, $1.50 net; paper, 85c.=

Plant Breeding By Hugo De Vries

Comments on the experiments of Nilsson and Burbank.
=Illustrated. Cloth, gilt, $1.50 net=

The Rise of Man By Paul Carus

A sketch of the human race. =Illustrated. Boards, cloth back,
75c net=

Species and Varieties, Their Origin and Mutation By Hugo De Vries

Edited by D. T. MacDougal. =Price, $5.00 net=

The Mutation Theory By Hugo De Vries

Experiments and observations on the origin of species in the
vegetable kingdom. (2 vols.) Translated by Prof. A. B. Farmer
and A. D. Darbishire. =Numerous illustrations, colored plates.
Cloth, per volume $4.00 net.=

Intracellular Pangenesis By Hugo De Vries

Including a paper on fertilization and hybridization. Translated
from the German by C. Stuart Gager. =Cloth, $3.00 net.=

On Memory and the Specific Energies of the Nervous By Ewald Hering System

New edition, including "The Theory of Nerve Activity."
=Price, $1.00; paper, 30c.=

Psychology of the Nervous System By Paul Carus

An extract from the author's larger work, "The Soul of Man."
=Price, 30c.=

The Psychology of Reasoning By Alfred Binet

Translated by Adam Gowan Whyte. =Cloth, 75c net=

Has the Psychological Laboratory Proved Helpful? By L. M. Billia

Translated from the French by Lydia G. Robinson. =Pp. 16. Paper,
15c net.=

A Mechanico-Physiological Theory of Organic Evolution By Carl von Nageli

Summary. =30c.=

Experiments on the Generation of Insects By Francesco Redi

Translated from the Italian edition of 1688 by Mab Bigelow.
=Illustrated. Cloth, $2.00 net=

Science and Faith, or Man as an Animal, and Man as a Member of Society, with a Discussion on Animal Societies By Paul Topinard

Translated by T. J. McCormack. =Price, $1.50 net=

A First Book in Organic Evolution By D. Kerfoot Shute

Written especially for the use of students. =Illustrated, seven
colored plates, 2d ed. Cloth, $1.25; paper, 60c net=

On Germinal Selection as a Source of Definite Variation By August Weismann

Translated by T. J. McCormack. =Paper, 30c=

Popular Scientific Lectures By Ernst Mach

Translated by T. J. McCormack. =Illustrated. $1.50 net; paper,
60c net=

Contributions to the Analysis of the Sensations By Ernst Mach

Translated by C. M. Williams. =Price, $1.25 net=

Space and Geometry in the Light of Physiological, Psychological and Physical Inquiry By Ernst Mach

Translated by T. J. McCormack. =Cloth, gilt top, $1.00 net=

The History and the Root of the Principle of the Conservation of Energy By Ernst Mach

Translated by Philip E. B. Jourdain. =Cloth, $1.25 net=

On the Inheritance of Acquired Characters By Eugenio Rignano

Translated by Basil C. H. Harvey. With an appendix "On the
Mnemonic Origin and Nature of Affective Tendencies." =Cloth,
$3.00 net=

Darwin and After Darwin By George J. Romanes

An exposition of the Darwinian theory and a discussion of
post-Darwinian Questions. =Three volumes, $4.00 net.=