Chapter VII: Part 7

6. Indeed, what cause is there to produce luxation in this latter joint. Is it from a forcible exertion of pronation or supination that this accident can occur? Surely not: for, on the one hand, as the lower articulation offers less resistance than the upper one, it is evident that, in either state of motion, it being the weakest, will be displaced first, and the motion being thus checked, can no longer operate to the displacement of the other. On the other hand, however forcible the motion may be, there will be in the upper articulation, nothing but a rotation of the bone on its own axis (3). How, then, without being carried forward, backward, &c. can the head be displaced? Indeed, it would be necessary that all the fastenings or bonds of attachment muscular and ligamentous, should be first broken. But these are too strong, and the motion is too weak. Can the displacement be produced by a blow impressed on the radius from below upwards? By no means: because the head of the humerus making, in this case, a solid resistance will not permit it to escape from the capsule (4). Can it arise from a violent extension or flexion of the fore-arm? No. This effort being altogether confined to the ulna, affects the radius in but a very faint degree.

7. It appears from hence, that the accidental luxation of the upper end of the radius, suddenly produced by external causes, must, if it ever occur, be extremely rare. But it is not so with respect to luxations which take place slowly in this joint, particularly in children, where, in consequence of repeated efforts, the ligaments become relaxed. But this kind of displacement, being almost always complicated with a swelling of the joint, and sometimes not to be reduced by the expedients of art, cannot be comprised in my present plan.

9. But experience would seem to have at times exposed the fallacy of these considerations and reasonings, founded merely on the structure of the parts. Duverney relates some instances of luxations of the head of the radius, produced suddenly by external causes. Two other practitioners are also of opinion that they have witnessed similar displacements. But did they examine the subject with all that attention which it required? A similar case was reported to the Academy of Surgery, by one of its associates; but doubts were entertained with regard to its reality: and, ultimately, there were so few facts in its favour, and such strong presumptions against it, that Desault was induced to deny the luxation altogether, till its reality should, by new proofs, be more certainly established.

After all, if it should occur, the same signs which announce the luxation, when the ligaments, in consequence of being gradually relaxed or in some way distended, permit the head of the radius to be insensibly displaced, would then appear as the sudden effect of external violence.

LUXATION OF THE LOWER EXTREMITY OF THE RADIUS.

§ III.

OF THE KINDS OF DISPLACEMENT.

9. The causes which produce the displacement of the lower end of the radius, are the same with those that give rise to other similar affections. 1st, The convulsive action of the pronator and supinator muscles, is doubtless a rare cause of the accident, since Desault never met with an instance of it. 2dly, The action of external bodies, which, by forcibly and suddenly producing the motions of pronation, rupture the posterior portion of the capsule, or, by those of supination, lacerate its anterior portion.

10. Hence two kinds of displacement, the one forward, the other backward. The first is somewhat frequent; the second is much less so. The latter was never seen by Desault but once, and that was in the corpse of a man who had had both his arms luxated, but respecting the circumstances of which he could receive no information. The other kind occurred frequently in his practice, of which five examples have been already published. The difference no doubt arises from this circumstance, that the greater part of our powerful motions are performed only in the direction of pronation. This appears to be proven by the following circumstances.

11. If, in several dead bodies, we lay bare the bones of the fore-arm, still united by their ligaments, and push the extremity of the radius forcibly backwards, that is, in the direction of supination, a laceration will as readily occur in the anterior part of the capsule, as it will in its posterior part, when, by forcibly pushing the same extremity forward, the motion of pronation is performed. Hence the difference does not arise from the structure, but from the direction of the motions impressed on the limb.

§ IV.

OF THE SIGNS.

12. The signs which characterize a luxation of the radius forward, are, 1st, The constant pronation of the limb: 2dly, An inability in it to assume the state of supination, and even severe pains arising from attempting it: 3dly, A protuberance larger than common, formed behind, by the small head of the ulna passing through the capsule: 4thly, The end of the radius being situated more anteriorly than natural: 5thly, The constant adduction, and almost constant extension of the wrist: 6thly, The semiflexion of the fore-arm, and very often of the fingers: this position is generally assumed by the fore-arm, in affections of the bones that form it, and, in the present case, cannot be changed without considerable pain: 7thly, A swelling more or less extensive, which sometimes appears around the articulation, at the moment of the accident, and which never fails to occur afterwards, unless the reduction be immediately effected. This occurrence may conceal the state of the articulation, and make the accident be considered, at first sight, as a sprain, as Desault witnessed in certain cases, where the disease had been mistaken by the surgeons who were first called to the persons injured. It is easy to conceive of the sad consequences of this mistake, which, by preventing any effort at reduction, gives the articular surfaces time to form adhesions, and thus oftentimes renders the mischief irreparable.

13. If to these signs be added, the severe pains experienced by the patient, the circumstances of the fall, in which the fore-arm is violently drawn into a state of pronation, we will have a view of every thing that can here aid the practitioner in his diagnosis.

14. Most of the foregoing signs, taken in the opposite sense, would characterize a luxation of the radius backward, should it occur: such, for example, as a forced supination of the limb, an inability as to pronation, the pains that would result from this movement if performed by force, the tumour formed anteriorly by the extremity of the ulna, the posterior situation of the large head of the radius, and the abduction of the wrist.

15. The dead body, in which Desault observed this kind of displacement (9), being dissected with care, exhibited in the articular parts, the following diseased state. The tendons of the flexor muscles, pushed outwards, adhered to one another and to the skin; a substance of a cellular texture filled up the sigmoid cavity of the radius, and occupied the place of the cartilage which naturally invests it: the inter-articular ligament, which passes between the ulna and the os pyramidalis, scarcely touched the head of the ulna, having followed the radius backwards; and the head of the ulna, situated before the sigmoid cavity of the radius, rested on one of the ossa sesamoidea, to which it was attached by a capsular ligament.

§ V.

OF THE REDUCTION.

16. Extension so important in the reduction of other luxations, renders scarcely any service in this: impulsion alone answers the purpose. If the displacement be forward, it is reduced in the following manner: The patient sits or stands indifferently; the latter position, however, has sometimes this advantage over the former, that by placing the part to be operated on more on a level with the hands of the surgeon, it gives him both more readiness and more force in his motions: one assistant supporting the elbow, separates the arm a little from the body; while another taking hold of the hand and fingers, gives them also an equable support.

17. The surgeon grasps the extremity of the fore-arm, with both hands, one placed on its internal, and the other on its external side, so that his two thumbs may meet before, between the ulna and the radius, and the fingers behind. He then exerts himself to separate the two bones from each other, by pushing the radius backward and outward, and retaining the ulna in its place; in the mean time the assistant who supports the hand, endeavours to move it in the direction of supination, and consequently to draw the radius, with which it is connected, into the same state. Being thus pushed in a direction opposite to that of its displacement, by two forces, the one exerted directly on it, and the other acting indirectly, the radius is forced outwards, and the ulna, returning through the opening in the capsule, is replaced in the sigmoid cavity.

18. Should a luxation of the radius backwards ever occur, the same process executed in an inverse direction, would serve the purposes of reduction. The surgeon with his fingers would have to press the extremity of the radius forward and inward, while a forcible pronatory movement impressed by the assistant on the hand intrusted to him, would favour the effort and finish the reduction.

19. The disappearance of the signs (12 ... 14) of the luxation bespeak its reduction. In general the pain is entirely removed; sometimes a perceptible sound, or report, caused by the passage of the bone through the opening in the capsule, announces the replacement.

20. When the luxation is of long standing, it is always attended with more or less difficulty, occasioned by the adhesions of the surrounding soft parts to the articulating surfaces, by the thickening of the capsule, which diminishes the size of its opening, by the rigidity contracted by the whole part, &c. It is, in such cases, useful to employ emollient applications for some time previously to attempting the reduction, in order to produce such a relaxation, and diminution of the congestion, as may favour the efforts of the surgeon.

21. The first patient whom Desault visited at the Hotel-Dieu in quality of surgeon in chief, had a luxation forward, of more than two months standing, in which the use of these means facilitated the reduction: but they are sometimes insufficient, and then the radius remains immoveable, and the forearm performs its motions but partially.

22. It would seem as if nature, always industrious to provide, amid the disorders of our organs, some resources for the exercise of their functions, has been desirous of preventing here, the inconvenience attendant on a failure of reduction, by rendering luxations backward much more difficult than those forward. Indeed if the fore-arm be kept constantly in a state of supination, it will be much less useful, than if it were always in a state of pronation, the situation in which most of the motions necessary to our existence are performed.

§ VI.

OF THE SUBSEQUENT TREATMENT.

23. When the reduction is finished, the articulating surfaces have sometimes a great tendency to be displaced, by the different movements of the fore-arm, a tendency of which we may easily form an idea, if we observe, that in a state of pronation, the head of the ulna presses against the back part of the strained capsule, and consequently against its opening, when the luxation has been forward: a contrary state of things occurs in a luxation backward. Whence it is always prudent to avoid, for some time, the motions of pronation and supination, according to the direction of the displacement.

24. Should the tendency to displacement be very great, it will be necessary to adopt the simple method pointed out in a case already published by Desault.

CASE I. The case was a luxation forward, which was easily reduced. But the easier the reduction, the more difficult was it to retain the replaced parts. This was at length accomplished, by fixing the fore-arm in a state of supination, and applying one thick compress behind the ulna, while the radius was pushed backward by another compress, placed on its anterior part, both secured by a common roller. This apparatus was continued for the space of a month, after which the reduced bones remained in their natural situation. The patient began, at first, to perform gentle motions of the wrist, avoiding those of pronation, on which he afterwards ventured by degrees, and with great caution.

25. These gentle motions frequently repeated, when a displacement is no longer to be apprehended, remove that unavoidable rigidity which, for some time, occupies the parts around the joint. It is advisable, for some time, to apply on the hand and extremity of the fore-arm, compresses wet with some discutient liquor, to prevent the swelling resulting perhaps from the inactivity and sprain of the parts. This was the practice of Desault.

I will close this memoir by two cases, extracted from the Journal of Surgery, in order to confirm, by experience, what has been already settled in theory.

CASE I. Desault was called to visit a child five years old, supposed to be labouring under a fracture of the arm. He learnt from the parents of the child, that, as it was lying in a very low bed, a young man who was playing with it, had taken hold of its fore-arm, and drawn it towards him, twisting it forcibly at the same time in the direction of pronation; that the effort had been accompanied by a report, and the child had immediately experienced an acute pain throughout the whole limb, but more particularly along the posterior part of the fore-arm.

When Desault saw the patient, no swelling had as yet supervened; the arm was removed from the body, and carried a little forward, while the fore-arm, half-bent, was kept in a state between pronation and supination. There existed, at its lower and back part, a preternatural tumour, formed by the head of the ulna carried behind the sigmoid cavity of the radius. The hand was a little extended, and in a state of adduction. The patient carefully preserved that position, and, as soon as it was changed, or the part affected touched, manifested signs of the most acute pain.

From these appearances, Desault discovered immediately a luxation of the radius forward, which was reduced in the manner already mentioned (16 and 17). By this process, the bones, being a little separated from each other, were replaced with facility. The suffering of the patient was immediately at an end; the limb resumed its natural state, and performed its functions as freely as before; lest some congestion might be the consequence, the injured parts were covered by compresses wet with camphorated spirits; these were secured by a bandage moderately tight, and no accident whatever supervened.

CASE II. On the 29th of January, 1789, Madeleine Fuser, a washer-woman, thirty-four years of age, had the lower extremity of the radius luxated forward.

Just as she had finished wringing a sheet, another washer-woman, who was assisting her to wring it, giving it a forcible jerk, did violence to her left arm, which was at the time in a state of strong pronation.

The woman experienced immediately a severe pain, accompanied by a sensation as if something had been torn. The sheet dropt from her hand, and she fell on the ground. Believing that she had received only a sprain, she neglected to apply for aid, and did not enter the Hotel-Dieu till the sixth day after the accident.

There was then a little swelling at the lower part of the fore-arm and at the wrist: the latter was extended and in a state of adduction; the fingers were bent. This woman suffered but little, when her hand was supported and kept still; but the pains became severe, when she attempted to move it. It was plainly perceived that the radius was placed before the ulna, and that the bones overlapped each other.

Process of reduction the same as in the preceding case. It was accompanied by a kind of report, and its completion was clearly announced by the restoration of the natural shape of the limb, and by the freedom of its motions. Compresses wet with vegeto-mineral water were applied to the wrist.

This patient remained fifteen days in the hospital, at the end of which, she performed with ease the motions of the wrist and hand.

MEMOIR XI.

ON THE FRACTURES OF THE THIGH.

§ I.

1. The os femoris, being in man, a moveable support for the weight of the whole body, appears to be better secured than the other bones, from accidents that might affect its continuity. The numerous masses of muscle that immediately surround it; the thick and compact layers or fasciæ that form its more exterior covering; and an articulation loose, and ready to yield, in every direction, to the motions impressed on it, all seem, on the one hand, calculated for its preservation.

2. But, on the other hand, being visibly curved in its middle, bent at its upper end almost at a right angle, longer in proportion in man than in quadrupeds, placed, in most falls, between the ground which resists, and the weight of the body which presses on it; it would seem, from these latter circumstances, to be less calculated to resist external force. And, if to these considerations be added those of the causes which have an immediate action on it, it will be easy to perceive, that, in a comparative scale of the bones most exposed to fractures, it holds, next to the bones of the leg, one of the highest grades. The proportion which its fractures bear to those of the leg, is, according to the observations of Desault, as one to three; but to that of most other bones it is equal if not superior.

3. The os femoris, being in its body irregularly cylindrical and curved behind, becomes larger towards its lower end, where it terminates in two articulating masses, which rest immediately on two corresponding surfaces of the os tibiæ; changing its direction above, it inclines towards the acetabulum, and inserts into that cavity a round head, supported by a neck which is entirely enclosed in the capsule of the joint.

4. From this different conformation of its different parts, arises such a variety in the fractures which occur in it, that they cannot be treated of under the same head. Hence the division into fractures of the body and of the extremities, which is borrowed from anatomists, and will be followed in the present memoir, where we will consider in order,

1st, The fractures of its body,
2dly, Those of its upper extremity,
3dly, Those of its lower extremity.

FRACTURES OF THE BODY OF THE OS FEMORIS.

§ II.

OF THE VARIETIES AND CAUSES.

5. The os femoris may be fractured indifferently at any point between its condyls and its neck. But the part where this accident most frequently occurs, is about the centre of the curve of the bone, where most of the motions and shocks impressed on it by external violence expend their force.

6. Whatever may be the seat of the fracture, its direction is sometimes transverse, but most frequently oblique, a variety which does not affect the real nature of the disease, but which possesses, as to its consequences, a very important influence. As in other affections of the kind, so here, the bone is sometimes affected alone, and, at other times, to a fracture simple or complicated by means of splinters, is added an injury done to the surrounding soft parts. Hence result compound fractures, differently varied, according to the nature of the parts affected, and to the extent and other circumstances of these affections. But, as Petit observes, this bone is less frequently shattered or crushed into several pieces, than those that are more superficially situated.

7. Extraneous causes are known to render falls more frequent in man than in other animals, and to multiply in him the fractures of the lower extremities, by multiplying the action of external bodies on these extremities. This action may be exerted on the os femoris in two modes. Sometimes only passive, it merely offers a resistance to the power which puts the bone in motion; thus, in a fall, the os femoris, being pressed between the ground which resists, and the weight of the body that bears on it, bends beyond the extent of its flexibility or pliancy, and finally gives way. At other times the influence of external bodies is actively and directly exerted in this accident: thus a stone, or a piece of timber, falling on the thigh, fractures the bone, in consequence of communicating to it a degree of motion greater than its power of resistance.

8. In common, the first mode of division is by a true counter-stroke, similar to that which fractures the clavicle, the ribs, &c. In the second mode, the fracture is always direct. The middle part of the bone is generally broken in a counter-stroke: wherever the direct stroke is received, that is the place of the fracture which it produces; the division, most frequently oblique in the first case, is sometimes perpendicular or transverse in the second. From a counter-stroke result most commonly simple fractures, while compound ones are usually owing to a direct stroke.

§ III.

OF THE SIGNS AND THE DISPLACEMENT.

9. In whatever manner a fracture of the os femoris may have occurred (7), its existence is characterized by the following signs: severe local pain at the instant of the accident; a sudden inability to move the limb; a preternatural mobility occurring in some particular part; a crepitation sometimes distinct, when the two fragments are rubbed against each other; and a deformity, which may be considered under the threefold relation, of length, thickness, and direction.[22] These signs, being common to most fractures, exhibit but few circumstances peculiar to those of the os femoris, except that of the deformity. Respecting this circumstance, in particular, it is essentially necessary to possess accurate ideas, because, having an incessant tendency to recur, especially in oblique fractures, it must constitute a primary object of attention during the treatment.

[22] (_La longueur, l’epaisseur, et la direction._) That is, the
thigh may be shorter than natural, owing to the ends of the broken
bone overlapping each other; it may have a protuberance on one
side, in consequence of these ends being separated or displaced
laterally; or the direction of the limb may be changed, by a bend
or angle being produced in the bone at the place of the fracture.
TRANS.

10. It may be laid down as a general principle, that all fractures of the os femoris are accompanied with some deformity; the exceptions to this rule are too few to be worthy of notice. If this deformity be considered in relation to length, it will be found that, in oblique fractures, the limb is always shorter than that of the opposite side, a circumstance which plainly points out an overlapping of the fragments. But, on examining the place of fracture, it is easy to discover, that this overlapping arises from the inferior fragment mounting upwards on the superior one, which itself remains immoveable. Now, what power, but the contraction of the surrounding muscles, can communicate to the inferior fragment a motion from below upwards? Attached, on the one hand, to the pelvis, and on the other to this fragment, to the rotula, the tibiæ, and the fibula, these muscles have on the former their fixed, and on the latter their moveable points, and, drawing the leg, the knee, and the inferior portion of the thigh upward, they produce the displacement and shortening either mediately or immediately. In this displacement, the adductores, the semi-tendinosus, the semi-membranosus, the rectus anterior, the rectus internus, &c. are the principal agents.

11. The following case communicated to Desault by a surgeon, who had been formerly his pupil, proves how great the influence of this cause is; a cause which is indeed generally acknowledged, but not sufficiently attended to by practitioners, with a reference to permanent extension. It is this that induces me to relate the case.

CASE I. A carpenter falling under the ruins of his scaffold, was immediately taken up and carried home, where a surgeon discovered an oblique fracture of the os femoris, but without any displacement. The thigh, which appeared even a little longer than the other, was fixed in an apparatus too slack to prevent muscular action. Next day, the length of the thigh was the same, but the whole extremity was in a paralytic state, accompanied by an entire inability to discharge urine.

The moxa was proposed. The patient being placed in the position directed by Pott, for fractures of the os femoris, the fire was applied; some movements were the consequence; the application being repeated on the sixth day, the muscles instantly recovered their power of action, and then the shortening of the limb became evident, and still returning immediately after being removed by extension, rendered it necessary to have recourse to an apparatus calculated for permanent extension.

12. In this case, the muscular influence is evident. Indeed the shock having produced a temporary suspension of the excitability of the part, the fragments remained in place and in proper contact with each other: but the moxa having awakened the excitability again in the muscles of the thigh, they resumed their action and caused, as usual, the inferior fragment to mount on the superior.

13. Hence it follows, 1st, that it is principally to the action of the muscles that we must attribute the displacement, in the longitudinal direction of the bone; 2dly, that, as that action, being the effect of an inherent power, is constantly exerted, the limb must have a constant tendency to this displacement, particularly in oblique fractures, where the two extremities of the bone represent two inclined plains, which readily glide along each other.

14. To this must be still added another cause, which operates injuriously in the course of the treatment. However solid the bed may be on which the patient lies, the nates or buttocks, being the most projecting part of the body, soon form a depression in it; hence arises an inclination or descent of the plain or surface on which the body lies. The body therefore sliding downwards, pushes before it the superior fragment, and makes it overlap the inferior one. In consequence of this, the muscles, being irritated by the points of the bones, increase the force of their contractions, and, as we have already observed (10), draw the inferior fragment upwards. This double movement of the two ends of the bone in contrary directions, produces only a single effect, namely, the overlapping of these ends, but carries this overlapping to a higher degree.

15. Transverse fractures are less exposed to displacement, in the longitudinal direction of the bone, because the fragments when in contact, support each other. In such a case, the inferior fragment, drawn by the muscles, finds a point of resistance against the superior one, while the latter, when pressed downward by the weight of the body, pushes the former before it, and thus both preserve their relative position.

16. A deformity of the fractured os femoris, in the direction of its cross-diameter or thickness (9), always accompanies that in its longitudinal direction, and sometimes exists alone. This takes place when, in a transverse fracture the two ends of the bone, losing their contact, are carried, the one outward, and the other inward, or when the one remains in its place, while the other is separated from it. In such a case, the superior fragment is not, as in the preceding one, immoveable by means of muscular action; because the action of the pectineus, the psoas, the illiacus, and the first adductores, derange its natural direction, and contribute to its displacement.

17. The deformity of the limb, in relation to its direction, in other words, the crookedness of the limb (9) is either the result of the stroke which fractured it, or, what is more common, of the ill directed efforts of those who lift and carry the patient, and, by an improper position, bend the two fragments, so as to make them form an angle with each other. Desault was once called to a patient, whom he found seated on a bed, in such a manner, that the upper part of the thigh was in a horizontal position, and the lower, hanging with the leg in almost a perpendicular one. Doubtless the triceps femoralis, equally attached to both fragments, bends them by its contraction, and produces a change in the direction of the limb.

18. Whatever may be the kind of the deformity, whether in a longitudinal or lateral direction, the inferior fragment may either preserve the natural position in which it is placed, or experience a rotatory motion on its axis outwards, which is a common occurrence, or inwards, a circumstance which is more rare. This rotation always renders the displacement more serious, and ought to have an influence, as I shall presently observe, on the means of reduction.

§ IV.

OF THE PROGNOSIS.

19. Fractures of the os femoris, though seldom very distressing, in common cases, from any accidents that immediately accompany them, are sometimes rendered so, by inconveniences which are the consequences of them, when they are oblique. Celsus declared, that a shortening of the limb, more or less considerable, was always the result of such fractures. Most authors have copied and repeated this assertion, and, even at the present day, the opinion is advocated by a great number of practitioners. It must be acknowledged, that, if we compare the natural powers that are engaged in producing displacement (10 ... 15), with the artificial resistance made by most of our forms of apparatus, we will perceive that there is between the two forces so great a disproportion in point of strength, that the former can never yield to the latter. But, is it in the nature of all forms of apparatus to be unable to overcome the force of the displacing powers? Cannot an equilibrium be established, so as to retain the fragments in contact? The remainder of the present memoir will throw some light on this problem, which will become less difficult of solution, if we call to mind, that the action of muscles, though very powerful at first, diminishes afterwards by degrees, in consequence of their being kept in a state of permanent extension; that even a weaker power may, by acting constantly, accomplish ultimately, what could not have been effected at once, by another power much stronger, if only momentarily applied; and that compression made by circular bandages, tends also to diminish the force and prevent the action of muscles.

Desault has cured, at the Hotel-Dieu, a vast number of fractures of the os femoris, without the least remaining deformity, and there are but few of his pupils who have not witnessed his success, some instances of which will be cited in this memoir.

20. It is, above all, from the well combined use of these two means, the extension and compression of the muscles, that that success was derived. The advantage of extension, in diminishing muscular force, is evident, particularly in the reduction of certain luxations, those of the humerus, for example, where we are frequently unable to succeed, till after having extended the muscles for a longer or shorter time.

Fractures of the rotula and of the olecranon, prove equally the utility of compression in effecting the same purpose; for, when the muscles are not compressed by a bandage, they draw the fragment upwards with a double and even treble force.

21. Accidents relating to complications of the fracture, such as splinters, wounds, &c. are to be classed with compound fractures in general, and cannot be treated of in this place.

§ V.

OF THE REDUCTION.

22. Two great indications enter into the treatment of fractures in general, and of that of the os femoris in particular; namely, to bring the fragments into proper contact, and to maintain them so. Let us examine each of these in all their details.

Hippocrates, and every practitioner since his time, have replaced the fragments by what they call extension, counter-extension, and coaptation.[23] This threefold method, though sanctioned by long usage, and rendered almost venerable by age, is by no means necessary at all times in practice, as will presently be observed. Previously to having recourse to it, it is necessary to place the patient in a suitable position. But this position varies: most of the moderns adopt, after the example of the ancients, a horizontal position: so that the thigh may be extended on the body, and the leg on the thigh. This is the common practice at present in France.

[23] A term of nearly the same import with “conformation.”
TRANS.

23. Pott imagined, on the contrary, that if the lower extremity were kept in a half-bent position, the muscles, being more relaxed, would offer less resistance to the efforts of the extension: he, therefore, proposed to bend the leg on the thigh, and the thigh on the pelvis, and to lay the patient on his side, a position, which, when first employed in reduction, was to be continued throughout the treatment, during which it would render the causes of displacement less active (10 ... 15). Bell adopted this method, which indeed appears to be generally in use in England.

24. But the difficulty of making extension and counter-extension, with the limb thus situated, the necessity of making them on the fractured bone itself, and not on a part distant from the fracture, such as the lower part of the leg; the impossibility of comparing the diseased thigh with the sound one, to judge of the regularity of the conformation; the uneasiness occasioned by this position, if long continued, though it may at first appear the most natural; the troublesome and painful pressure of the body on the great trochanter of the affected side; the derangements to which the fragments are exposed when the patient goes to stool; the difficulty of fixing the leg with sufficient steadiness, to prevent it from affecting the os femoris by its motions; the evident impracticability of this method, when both thighs are broken; and, finally, experience, which, in France, has been by no means favourable to the position recommended by Pott: such were the considerations, which determined Desault to have recourse to it no more, after having tried it on two patients, in one of whom the limb was considerably shortened, notwithstanding the most scrupulous attentions.

25. Besides, all that is gained by the relaxation of some muscles, is lost, by the tension of several others. The knee cannot be bent without the triceps flexor being brought into action; an inconvenience the more serious, as this muscle acts immediately on both fragments. The rectus anterior, though relaxed by the flexion of the thigh, will be thrown into a state of tension by the flexion of the leg. The muscles attached posteriorly to the upper fragment, and even to the superior part of the lower one, will also in certain positions of the limb be rendered tense.

26. Hence it follows, that there can be no just comparison instituted as to the position proper for the limb, between fractures of the upper and those of the lower extremities; that, in the latter, the method pursued by the English surgeons presents an aggregate or general amount of inconveniences so great as to overbalance that of its advantages; and, that the position directed by Hippocrates and the other Greek physicians (22) ought to be adopted.

27. Having determined on the position, the operator proceeds to extension and counter-extension, which are to be made first in the direction of the limb as deformed or altered by the fracture, but must be changed afterwards according to the natural direction of the thigh. I need not here repeat the directions for this double operation: common to all fractures, they contain nothing particular, in relation to that of the thigh. But, on what part should extension be made? Petit, Heister, Duverney, and all their predecessors, recommend to apply the means or powers for making extension above the knee; a precept which is still to be found in the surgical department of the Encyclopedia. A strap surrounding the lower part of the thigh, aided by another placed at the ancle, serves, in this respect, to draw the inferior fragment downward.

28. Dupouy was the first to remark, that this practice rendered it necessary to employ great force, and that it would be better to make extension only on the foot. To this consideration Fabre added that of the inconvenience of the pressure made on the muscles, a pressure which, by irritating them and making them contract, multiplies the obstacles to the reduction.

Desault adopted their doctrine, from nearly the same views of the subject, introduced it into the Hotel-Dieu, and the success which attended it, in his practice, contributed not a little to bring it into general use.

29. For the purpose of making extension, he used the foot as a lever of the first kind. The two hands of an assistant, grasping it in such a manner, as to make the fingers cross on the back of it, while the thumbs, also crossing each other, corresponded to the sole, represented the power; the articulation represented the centre of motion, or fulcrum, and the leg together with the lower fragment, the resistance. The requisite motion was then communicated to the foot, and in that way was the extension effected. This mode is more advantageous than that usually employed, where the hands are applied to the lower extremity of the leg; for the force of the extending power is generally in the inverse ratio of its distance from the resistance intended to be overcome.

30. What I have said of extension (28), applies also to counter-extension. The strap, which was formerly placed for this purpose in the groin of the affected side, by compressing the adductores, and the rectus internus, produced in them a contraction, which, by drawing the lower fragment towards the pelvis, opposed obstacles to the reduction, which are seldom experienced, when, like Desault, the surgeon contents himself with having the trunk held by assistants, either exclusively at the hips, or both at the hips and under the arm-pits. The resistance being always easily overcome in this affection, renders it unnecessary to have recourse to more powerful means.

31. Hippocrates advises, in fractures of the os femoris, to aid extension by coaptation, performed with the hand. All practitioners, since his time, have added this third manœuvre or process to the two first, namely, extension and counter-extension. But, what effect can the hands produce, in most cases, on the bone through the thick covering of the soft parts? Are we able to communicate to it through such a mass whatever lateral movement we please? Being quite lost in the intervening soft parts, will our efforts reach the bone, in the direction which we give them? The muscles bring the fragments into contact, much better than we can, as soon as extension has removed their overlapping. Indeed, if well executed extension makes the lower fragment return along the same track which it pursued in becoming displaced, it will then be inevitably brought into contact with the upper one by the contraction of the muscles. Besides, in most oblique fractures, is it not evident, that the lower fragment must be made to slide from above downward, on the inclined plain presented by the upper one, and on which it has slided from below upward, in becoming displaced? Is it while extension is making that coaptation ought to be performed? Certainly not: because, if the extension be well directed, an attempt at coaptation will derange it; and if it be not well directed, its course ought to be changed. Is it after extension is finished that recourse ought to be had to coaptation? By no means: because if there be then any remains of deformity, it must be owing to extension having been improperly directed. The remedy, therefore, is, to renew the extension, and direct it properly.

32. Hence, it follows, in general, that coaptation is here a feeble assistant towards reduction; that if it renders any service, it is only in cases of displacement laterally, or in the direction of the cross-diameter of the bone; and that it is by giving the proper direction to extension, by managing it according to the disposition of the muscles, and by knowing when to augment and when to slacken it, that the fragments are brought into regular contact.

33. If the inferior fragment has experienced a rotatory motion on its own axis outwards or inwards (18), the assistant ought, in making extension, to turn the limb very gradually in the opposite direction.

34. Extension was formerly attended with difficulties, which are rarely met with at the present day. Oftentimes, if we give credit to authors, it was altogether useless to endeavour, in the first instance, to reduce the fracture, and restore the limb to its natural length, as the contraction of the muscles rendered the operation absolutely impracticable. Hence, applications of a soothing and sedative nature were employed, previously to an attempt at reduction. The following circumstances have been assigned as the cause of these difficulties. The upper strap, irritating and drawing upwards the adductores and the rectus internus, drew the lower fragment in the same direction, while the semi-tendinosus, semi-membranosus, biceps, &c. being drawn downwards by the lower strap applied over them, drew the pelvis also downwards, and, consequently, the superior fragment connected with it. From this double action arose a double motion directly opposed to that which ought to be produced by extension.

35. There are still cases, where the muscles, in consequence of being irritated by projections or points of bone, by the efforts of the assistants, and by a morbid state of the nerves, increase their contraction to such a pitch that no practicable force can bring the fragments into apposition. What means are then to be employed? All those, in general, that diminish irritability, varied according to circumstances, such as diet, venesection, &c. In such cases, Desault obtained the most happy effects, by placing the limb in a state of continued extension; fatigued by the permanent tension in which they are thus kept, the muscles relax by degrees; their force diminishes; at length they yield, and the reduction is accomplished.

§ VI.

OF THE MEANS OF MAINTAINING THE REDUCTION.

36. The mere reduction of a fracture of the os femoris, is but one step towards the cure. In this, more than in the fracture of any other bone, causes which act incessantly (13) tend to subvert the momentary work of art; it is here, then, in particular, that means ought to be devised for maintaining this work. But, the first of these means is a suitable position of the limb. I have already mentioned the inconveniences that result, both as to the reduction and subsequent treatment, from that proposed by Pott (24 ... 26). The patient must, then, be laid horizontally on a plain exactly even, and not capable of being affected or rendered uneven by the weight of the body. Instead of feather beds generally used in other cases at the Hotel-Dieu, Desault, in cases of fractures, substituted firm and hard mattresses, which, not sinking in the least, by the pressure of the body, give no cause to apprehend those continual displacements, to which a soft bed exposes the patient. These mattresses supersede the advice of certain authors who direct a plank to be placed under the patient.

37. The second means, not less efficacious than the first, consist in the forms of apparatus, in which the limb is placed, and which, being differently modified according to the fancies of their different authors, present us with an assemblage of various splints, compresses, &c. To appreciate, with accuracy and correctness, the advantage and disadvantage of these, let us first unfold the curative indications which they ought to fulfil; we will then compare their mode of action with these indications, from whence will result, as necessary inferences, the object of our research.

38. The intention of every form of apparatus being, to prevent the displacement of the fragments, the causes of this displacement ought to be the basis or foundation of its mechanism and construction. But these causes in the present case are, 1st, the muscular action drawing the inferior fragment upwards (10); 2dly, the weight of the body pushing the superior fragment downwards (14); whence every form of apparatus intended to keep the os femoris in place when fractured obliquely, ought, 1st, to draw the lower fragment downward and retain it there; 2dly, to draw and retain upwards the superior fragment, and the trunk which bears on its upper end. This principle is applicable generally, and subject only to a few exceptions which I shall notice when treating of transverse fractures, where the displacement is lateral, or in the direction of the cross-diameter of the bone, or where no displacement at all exists. 3dly, The apparatus must also be so constructed as to prevent the rotatory motions of the lower fragment (18), and secure the immobility of the limb, lest by means of some motion being communicated to it, the fragments might be deranged.

§ VII.

OF THE MANNER IN WHICH THE DIFFERENT PIECES OF THE APPARATUS ACT.

39. If to these indications we compare the mode of action of the different pieces that unite in composing our common forms of apparatus which do not make permanent extension, such as common bandages, splints, compresses, bolsters, &c. we will perceive that they are but ill calculated to fulfil them: and first of bandages. Whether the common roller, or the eighteen-tailed bandage be employed, their mode of operation is the same: their only action is, to add a second exterior and artificial covering to the natural cutaneous and aponeurotic covering of the thigh; to press against the fragments the muscles which form for them a kind of natural case intended to keep them in apposition; and to augment, by this pressure, the lateral resistance of the soft parts. By this contrivance, lateral displacements will, in part, be well guarded against, and, in this respect, these bandages are useful in transverse fractures. But what is there in them to prevent the two inclined plains of an oblique fracture from sliding on each other? What provision is there in them to secure the limb from the effects of motions and shocks which may be accidentally impressed on it from without? Will the pelvis be kept steady by them? or will muscular action be sufficiently checked and kept under by them? The force of the muscles will indeed be slightly diminished by means of compression; and to make this compression is the principal use of these bandages in oblique fractures. But will mere compression be sufficient to prevent a displacement in the longitudinal direction of the bone, particularly if the rollers be slack, as certain practitioners recommend, on the ground of the fallacious theory of Duhamel, who conceived, that a constriction too tight, would injure the action of the periosteum, which, according to him, is the sole agent in the formation of callus? So much, then, for bandages, whose only use is to prevent, by compression, the swelling of the limb, and to diminish, in some degree, the contraction of the muscles, which they press against the fractured bone.

40. These remarks apply equally well to the use of compresses; which make but a very feeble resistance against a powerful cause, and cannot be considered as any obstacle whatever to displacement. What can be said of those surgeons who, from servile attachment to a particular form of apparatus, do not consider a fracture as reduced, unless a certain quantity of compress secured by a given quantity of roller, be applied on the limb. Servile imitators in an art which calls for genius in its votaries, they are only capable of following, without reflection or judgment, the steps of their predecessors.

41. Bandages will do nearly as much harm as good in fractures of the os femoris, if, as was practised by the ancients, they be formed by a single roller surrounding the limb: in such a case, the limb being necessarily raised up at each time of their reapplication, will be exposed to continual displacements. Hence the ingenious idea of applying to simple fractures of the lower extremities the eighteen-tailed bandage, invented for compound fractures, and by means of which the thigh may be suffered to remain at rest. But to this bandage belongs also an inconvenience. The pieces which compose it, being stitched together, cannot be separated, and if one of them be soiled they must all be changed. Hence the superiority of the bandage of slips, known in former times, and engraved by Scultel, but long since forgotten, till Desault revived the use of it, and adopted it exclusively, both in simple and in compound fractures.

42. Splints of different kinds, which form the second division of the pieces of apparatus, used for fractures of the os femoris, have the advantage of fixing the limb in a solid and firm manner, and securing it from any displacement that might result from jolts, or muscular contraction, arising from the inattention of patients: these prevent, more effectually than bandages, any displacement laterally, and, on this account, their use is sufficient, even without extension, in transverse fractures: they also prevent, particularly if they be made of wood, the rotatory motion of the thigh either outwards or inwards (18). But if the division be oblique, will they prevent the gliding of the fragments over one another, and the consequent shortening of the limb? They can evidently produce this effect in no other way, than by the forcible pressure made by the pieces of apparatus, particularly by the straps or bandages that secure the splints, and then, to make effectual resistance, it would be necessary to apply them with such a degree of tightness as would endanger the life of the limb. Will splints prevent the trunk from sinking downwards, and pushing the superior fragment before it? Will they prevent the muscles from acting on the lower fragment? Can they, in a word, fulfil all the indications formerly pointed out (28)? Certainly they cannot. Splints, then, are calculated only to prevent displacement in the lateral or cross direction of the bone, and to secure, better than bandages, the immobility of the limb. Whence it follows, that they ought not, in this case, to be confined to the thigh alone, but should extend to the leg, whose movements, if communicated to the os femoris, may derange the contact of the ends of the bone. The neglect of this precaution, contributed formerly not a little to displacement and deformity.

43. In former times a kind of splints was in use, which were made by securing bundles of straw round sticks proportioned in length to the length of the limb to which they were to be applied. But as these, from being of a round or cylindrical form, touched the limb with but a narrow surface, they did not retain the fracture with sufficient firmness. They were, therefore, very properly exchanged for flat and strong wooden splints, (such as Desault used) which retain the fracture much better, in consequence of presenting to the limb a broad surface, and thereby rendering it in some measure immoveable.

44. The bolsters for filling up interstices, being less intended to prevent displacement, (in which respect they are, notwithstanding useful) than to guard the limb from the immediate pressure of the splints, usually consist of several folds of old linen; this is the form adopted at the Hotel-Dieu; but to these Desault preferred small pallets or bags filled with chaff, which, fashioned according to the form and disposition of the limb, may, at the pleasure of the surgeon, be made thicker or thinner, to suit the inequalities of the surface, in consequence of the ease with which the chaff may be moved from one part of the bag to another.

45. From the foregoing examination of the action of bandages and splints, it appears, that the common apparatus, formed by their union, but not calculated to effect a permanent extension, may perhaps answer in cases of transverse fractures, which indeed but rarely occur, but are always insufficient when the division is oblique, because they cannot fulfil the double indication of drawing the inferior fragment down, and retaining the superior one up (38).

§ VIII.

OF PERMANENT EXTENSION, AND THE MEANS OF EFFECTING IT.