Skip to content

Chapter XV: Conclusion

Text size

The conclusion is in fact inevitable. Ireland cannot have it both ways. She cannot have financial independence and financial dependence at the same time. No Colony has ever claimed or been granted these inconsistent conditions. If Colonial precedents are cited, their essential limitations should also be borne in mind. Colonial loans are not charged on the Consolidated Fund. Nor have Colonial railways been nationalised with the money and credit of the United Kingdom, in order to favour local exports at the expense of imports from England.

Our examination of the question brings us to the clear conclusion that it is only under the existing system of a single Parliament and Executive for the United Kingdom that the problems of transit and transport in Ireland, or between Great Britain and Ireland, can be satisfactorily solved, whether from the point of view of finance, justice to shareholders, or advantage to the trade and convenience of both countries.

NOTE.--It has been suggested, since the above was written, that the
balance in the Irish Post Office Savings Banks (now about
L12,500,000) might be available to the new Irish Government, for
advances to farmers and other public purposes. The suggestion
involves the applicability of such advances for the purchase or
amalgamation of the Irish railways under an Irish public authority.
Such a proposal will not bear close examination.

It is an essential condition of the existence of Savings Bank
deposits that the deposits should be always available on the call
of depositors; and this condition would no longer be fulfilled if
the balances were locked up in Irish railways. In fact, if there
was any suggestion that these balances should be used for the
purpose of enabling the Irish Government to run the railways on
uncommercial principles, the deposits would very soon diminish or
disappear--and this apart from the question whether under Home
Rule, the deposits would in any event remain at anything like their
present high figure.

FOOTNOTES:

[Footnote 92: Viceregal Commission on Irish Railways, Final Report, 1910 (Cd. 5247). Final Report on the Canals and Inland Navigations of Ireland, 1911 (Cd. 5626).]

[Footnote 93: "The Framework of Home Rule," p. 174.]

[Footnote 94: Figures are taken from Viceregal Commission Reports, p. 78, Report.]

[Footnote 95: Page 78, Report.]

[Footnote 96: Page 58, Report.]

[Footnote 97: Final Report, pp. 76-83.]

[Footnote 98: We have taken the Act of 1844 as the basis referred to by the Commissioners, though it is very doubtful (having regard to the great variety of railway share and loan capital), if the terms of sect. 2 are now suitable; moreover sect. 4 requires a special Act of Parliament to be passed to raise the money, and settle the special conditions of the purchase option.]

[Footnote 99: Majority Report, p. 76.]

[Footnote 100: "Framework of Home Rule," p. 281.]

[Footnote 101: Final Report on the Canals and Navigations of Ireland. 1911. (Cd. 5626.)]

Comments

Log in to leave a comment.

Against Home Rule: The Case for the UnionChapter XV: Conclusion

0%2 min left in chapter