Chapter XVI: Appendix: p.245

* * * * *

LIST OF EUCKEN'S WORKS

1866. "De Aristotelis docendi ratione." Pars I. De particularis. This was
the Doctor's dissertation at Göttingen University.

1868. "Über den Gebrauch der Präpositionem bei Aristoteles."

1870. "Über die Methode und die Grundlagen der Aristotelischen Ethik"
(Separatabdruck aus dem Programm des Frankfurter Gymnasiums von 1870).

1871. "Über die Bedeutung der Aristotelischen Philosophie fur die Gegenwart"
(Akademische Antrittsrede gehalten am 21 November, 1871). This was in
Basel.

1872. "Die Methode der Aristotelischen Forschung in ihrem Zusammenhang mit
den philosophischen Grundprincipien des Aristoteles."

1874. "Über den Wert der Geschichte der Philosophie" (Antrittsrede, Jena,
1874).

1878. "Die Grundbegriffe der Gegenwart." This was translated by Stuart
Phelps in 1880, and published by Appleton of New York. The fourth
edition has been translated by M. Booth, and has been published by
T. Fisher Unwin in 1912. The title of the third German edition was
changed to "Geistige Stromungen der [p.246] Gegenwart."
The English edition is entitled "The Main Currents of Modern Thought."

1879. "Geschichte der philosophischen Terminologie."

1880. "Über Bilder und Gleichnisse in der Philosophie": Eine Festschrift.

1881. "Zur Erinnerung an K.Ch.F. Krausse" (Festrede, gehalten zu Eisenberg
am 100 Geburtstage des Philosophen).

1884. "Aristoteles Anschauung von Freundschaft und von Lebensgütern."

1885. "Prolegomena zu Forschungen über die Einheit des Geisteslebens in
Bewusstsein und Tat der Menschheit."

1886. "Die Philosophie des Thomas von Aquino und die Kultur der Neuzeit."

1886. "Beiträge zur Geschichte der neueren Philosophie." (Second edition,
1906, under the title "Beiträge zur Einführung in die Geschichte
der Philosophie.")

1888. "Die Einheit des Geisteslebens in Bewusstsein und Tat der Menschheit."
This will be published by Williams & Norgate.

1890. "Die Lebensanschauungen der grossen Denker." The ninth edition
appeared in 1911. Changes and additions have been made in each
succeeding edition. English translation (1909) by W.S. Hough and
W.R. Boyce Gibson under the title "The Problem of Human Life, as
viewed by the Great Thinkers from Plato to the Present Time"
(published by Charles Scribners' Sons, New York; and T. Fisher
Unwin, London).

1896. "Der Kampf um einen geistigen Lebensinhalt." (Second edition, with
many changes, 1907.) A translation of this volume will be published
by Williams & Norgate in the spring of 1913.

1901. "Das Wesen der Religion." (First and second editions.) This essay
was translated by W. Tudor Jones in 1904, and was published for
private circulation. It is now out of print, but will soon reappear
together with another essay, "Wissenschaft und Religion."

1901. "Der Wahrheitsgehalt der Religion," 1901. (Second edition, with
numerous changes, 1905; third edition, with changes, 1912.) The
second edition was translated by W. Tudor Jones, and published by
Williams & Norgate in 1911 under the title of "The Truth of Religion."
A translation of the third German edition will be published at the
close of 1912.

1901. "Thomas von Aquino und Kant: ein Kampf zweier Welten."

1903. "Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Philosophie und Lebensanschauung."

1905. "Was können wir heute aus Schiller gewinnen?" (Kantstudien: Sonderdruck).

1905. "Wissenschaft und Religion." This comprises a chapter in the collection
of essays entitled "Beiträge zur Weiterentwickelung der Christlichen
Religion."

1907. "Grundlinien einer neuen Lebensanschauung." This volume was translated
by Alban G. Widgery, and published by A. & C. Black in 1911 under the
title of "Life's Basis and Life's Ideal."

1907. "Hauptprobleme der Religionsphilosophie der Gegenwart." (First edition,
1907; fourth and fifth editions (with additions), 1912.) The first
edition was translated by W.R. Boyce Gibson and Lucy Gibson under the
title "Christianity and the New Idealism: a Study in the Religious
Philosophy of To-day." This is published by Harper & Brothers, London
and New York.

1907. "Philosophie der Geschichte." This is an essay in the volume entitled
"Systematische Philosophie" in the series "Kultur der Gegenwart."

1908. "Sinn und Wert des Lebens." Third edition (with many additions), 1911.
The first edition was translated by W. R. Boyce Gibson and Lucy Gibson
under the title of "The Meaning and Value of Life" (Publishers:
A. & C. Black).

1908. "Einführung in eine Philosophie des Geisteslebens." Translated by the
late F.L. Pogson under the title of "The Life of the Spirit" (third
edition, 1911).

1911. "Religion and Life" (the Essex Hall Lecture for 1911). This is
published by the Lindsey Press, London.

1911. "Können wir noch Christen sein?" A translation of this is in
preparation.

1912. "Naturalism or Idealism?" (the Nobel Lecture, translated by
A.G. Widgery). This is published by Heffer & Sons, Limited,
Cambridge.

1912. "Erkennen und Leben." A translation of this work, by W. Tudor Jones,
is in preparation, and will be published by Williams & Norgate in
the spring of 1913 under the title of "Knowledge and Life: An
Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge."

1913. "Erkenntnistlehre." This volume will appear early in 1913. The
translation will also appear during 1913, and the book will be
published by Williams & Norgate under the title of "The Theory
of Knowledge."

* * * * *

FOOTNOTES:

[1] It is not only in Germany, but also in England, that natural
scientists forget this important fact. The Presidential Address of
Professor Schäfer at the British Association (September 1912) is an
instance of attempting to explain life in terms of its history and
of its lowest common denominator. And huge assumptions have to be
made in order to explain as little as this.

[2] A fuller treatment of this subject will be found in my
forthcoming volume, _Pathways to Religion_. It is incorrect to
state with Professor Sorley (_Recent Tendencies in Ethics_, p. 30)
that "her [Germany's] philosophy betrays the dominance of material
interests."

[3] An important article on this book appeared in _Mind_ during
1896, and, as far as I can trace, this seems to be the first
serious attention which was given to Eucken's writings in England.
A translation of the volume will appear shortly by Messrs Williams
& Norgate.

[4] Cf. _Main Currents of Modern Thought_, translated by Dr M.
Booth (1912).

[5] _Main Currents of Modern Thought_, p. 259.

[6] _The Truth of Religion_, p. 6l.

[7] _Ibid._, p. 62.

[8] W. James's _Text-Book of Psychology_, p. 145.

[9] William Wallace's _Lectures and Essays on Natural Theology and
Ethics_, p. 210.

[10] Edward Caird's Introduction to William Wallace's Gifford
Lectures, pp. xxx, xxxi.

[11] On this conception of the spiritual as _More, cf._ Bosanquet's
_Psychology of the Moral Self_.

[12] _Cf._ Wicksteed's _The Religion of Time and the Religion of
Eternity_, in Carpenter and Wicksteed's _Studies in Theology_.

[13] Eucken's best account of this subject is found in Parts I.,
II., and V. of his _Truth of Religion_ and in _Beiträge zur
Weiterentwickelung der Religion_, pp. 240-281. This latter is a
volume of ten essays by well-known German religious teachers.

[14] The President of the British Association (1912) states in his
address that it is not within his province to touch the question
concerning the nature of the soul. I take the report of his address
from _Nature_, 5th September. Dr Haldane goes much further in the
direction of Vitalism (discussion at British Association on the
subject).

[15] _Cf._ Driesch: _Philosophy of the Organism_; _Vitalismus als
Geschichte und Lehre_; his article in _Lebensanschauung_ (a
collection of essays by twenty German thinkers, 1911); Reinke's
_Philosophie der Botanik_; McDougall's _Body and Mind_; Thomson's
_Heredity, Evolution_, and _Introduction to Science_ (the two
latter in the Home University Library). Bergson's _Creative
Evolution_ deals with the subject, but the value of this book is
greater in other directions. T.H. Morgan's _Regeneration_ is a
weighty contribution to the subject.

[16] A revival of the study of Kant's first _Critique_ would be of
great value to our natural scientists. Green, in his _Prolegomena
to Ethics_, has interpreted this aspect in a manner that ought not
to be forgotten. _Cf._ further Edward Caird's _Evolution of
Religion_, vol. i.

[17] Ward's _Naturalism and Agnosticism_, vol. i., is a reply to
this important question.

[18] _Cf._ Münsterberg's _Psychology and Education_, and his
_Eternal Values_; also Royce's _The World and the Individual_.

[19] This trans-subjective aspect has been worked out in an
original way by Volkelt in his _Quellen der menschlichen
Gewisskeit_.

[20] The works of Münsterberg and Rickert deal with great clearness
on this difference of subject-matter in science and history.

[21] The main weakness of Bergson's philosophy seems to be in not
recognising this problem. Bosanquet, in his _Principle of
Individuality and Value_, has very clearly recognised and
interpreted it upon similar lines to Eucken.

[22] In this respect Eucken and Bergson seem to agree, although it
is difficult to reconcile this aspect of Bergson's with his
statements concerning the grasping of reality in the perceptions of
the moment.

[23] "Hegel To-day," _The Monist_, April 1897.

[24] _Truth of Religion_, p. 328.

[25] Green has dealt with this aspect in the first part of his
_Prolegomena to Ethics_ in practically the same way as Eucken.
_Cf._ also Nettleship's _Life of Green_ and his (Nettleship's)
_Philosophical Remains_.

[26] This need of differentiation has been presented by Münsterberg
in a powerful manner in his _Psychology and Life, Eternal Values_,
and _Science and Idealism_.

[27] Münsterberg's _Science and Idealism_, p. 10; _cf._ also his
_Grundsuge der Psychologie_, Bd. i., 1900.

[28] Wundt's _Grundriss der Psychologie_ and the article
"Psychologie" in _Philosophie im beginn des Zwanzigsten
Jahrhunderts (Festschrift fur Kuno Fischer_, art. 1).

[29] _The Truth of Religion_, pp. 178 _f_.

[30] It is a great merit of Bergson, too, to have perceived this
fundamental difference. The difference between intellect and
intuition, in his larger volumes, is more illuminating on the side
of intellect. The relation of both is expressed by him more clearly
in his short _Introduction to Metaphysics_ (soon to appear in
English).

[31] Troeltsch, in his _Psychologie und Erkenntnistheorie_, has
perceived the difference very clearly, but in a manner quite
different from Bergson. Troeltsch has dealt with the presence of
the content of the over-empirical as something which is higher than
any psychology of the soul, and which is at the farthest remove
from the percept.

[32] Richard Kade, in his new book, _Rudolf Euckens noologische
Methode_, points out very clearly Eucken's contributions on this
point from 1885 downwards. Kade further deals with the later
developments of Windelband, Rickert, Troeltsch, and Wobbermin in
the same direction.

[33] _Historical Studies in Philosophy_,1912, p. 176.

[34] _Cf._ the two remarkable volumes of Baron von Hügel, _The
Mystical Elements of Religion_,1908, and especially vol. ii. These
books are a mine of rich things, but I have not observed that many
in our country have as yet realised this fact.

[35] _The Truth of Religion_, p. 456.

[36] _Main Currents of Modern Thought_, p. 353.

[37] _The Truth of Religion_, p. 59.

[38] _Cf. Decadence_, Henry Sidgwick Memorial Lecture, by the Rt.
Hon. Arthur James Balfour, M.P., 1908. Mr Balfour has perceived the
problem in a more optimistic manner than Professor Eucken; but he,
too, is conscious that much is required of the people. "Some kind
of widespread exhilaration or excitement is required in order to
enable any community to extract the best results from the raw
material transmitted to it by natural inheritance" (p. 62).

[39] _Main Currents of Modern Thought_, p. 398.

[40] This aspect has been developed in modern times by
Schopenhauer, Ed. von Hartmann, and others. Bergson seems to me to
be greatly indebted to Schopenhauer. Schopenhauer's Will and
Bergson's _élan vital_ are practically the same (_cf_.
Schopenhauer's _Über den Willen in der Natur,_ and Bergson's
_Creative Evolution_). Edward Carpenter, in his _Art of Creation_,
has worked out a similar point of view independently of Bergson.

[41] _Der Kampf um einen geistigen Lebensinhalt_, Zweite Auflage,
1907, S. 331.

[42] Sonderdruck, 1905.

[43] George Meredith, _The Sage Enamoured and the Honest Lady_.

[44] _Cf._ the closing passages of Bradley's _Appearance and
Reality_ for a similar view; also the latter part of Ward's _Realm
of Ends_.

[45] This weakness of Bergson's philosophy is shown in the whole of
Bosanquet's _Principle of Individuality and Value_.

[46] It is a great merit of Windelband to have brought this aspect
of the _Ought_ prominently forward in contradistinction to the
over-importance attached to the _Will_ alone by the Pragmatists.
_Cf._ his _Präludien_.

[47] _The Truth of Religion_, p. 175.

[48] Modern psychology would agree with such a view, but probably
not with the implications given to it by Eucken. The "faculty"
psychology as it was presented by Kant has now disappeared, and
consciousness is conceived as a unity in which the three aspects
referred to are present, and even the single aspect that is in the
foreground of consciousness is influenced by the others which are
in the background. Another point made clear by Höffding (_cf_. his
_Psychology)_ and others is the difference between the activity of
consciousness in the "drifting" process of association of ideas and
its power to stem the association current, and to turn it into new
directions by means of the reflective power of consciousness
itself.

[49] It is a great merit of Bergson's philosophy to have pointed
this out. It is a conception presented several times in the history
of philosophy, but there is great need of re-emphasising it to-day,
especially as things in space have gripped the soul with such power
and disastrous results.

[50] _The Truth of Religion_, p. 243.

[51] _The Truth of Religion_, p. 200. _Cf._ also _Können wir noch
Christen sein_? pp. 91-141.

[52] _Cf._ Ward's _The Realm of Ends_, chapters ii. and xx.; also
Caird's _Evolution of Religion_ has many valuable hints throughout
the two volumes pointing in the same direction.

[53] _The Truth of Religion_, p. 436.

[54] Quoted in _The Truth of Religion_, p. 436.

[55] Cf. _The Truth of Religion_, pp. 429 ff.

[56] _The Truth of Religion_, p. 430.

[57] This fact is very clearly interpreted by Rickert in his
_Gegenstand der Erkenntnis_.

[58] _The Truth of Religion_, p. 431.

[59] I cannot but believe that the supposed proofs brought forward
by Sir Oliver Lodge and others are so empirical as to be of very
little value to religion.

[60] _The Truth of Religion_, p. 533.

[61] _The Truth of Religion_, pp. 367, 368.

[62] _The Truth of Religion_, pp. 11, 12.

[63] _The Truth of Religion_, p. 545. It is on this fact that
Eucken builds his conception of immortality. Such a conception is
not a matter of speculation or of scientific proof, but a matter of
an experience born on the summit of the evolution of spiritual life
within the soul. It is useless to attempt to press such an
experience into a conceptual mould.

[64] _The Truth of Religion_, pp. 550, 551.

[65] Driesch is attempting the construction of such a Metaphysic of
Nature, and a similar attempt is to be discovered in Bergson's
philosophy, especially in its later developments.

[66] Troeltsch has also emphasised this truth in his _Absolutheit
des Christentums und die Religionsgeschichte_ and in his _Bedeutung
der Geschichtlichkeit Jesu für den Glauben_. These two small
volumes are of great value.

[67] Cf. _Können wir noch Christen sein_? pp. 150 to 210; _Das
Wesen der Religion; Life's Basis and Life's Ideal_, p. 332 ff.;
_Christianity and the New Idealism_, chapter iv.; _The Truth of
Religion_, pp. 539 to 616.

[68] _The Truth of Religion_, p. 360.

[69] _Das Wesen der Religion_, S. 16.

[70] The closing sections of _The Truth of Religion._ A similar
aspect is presented in the final chapter of _Können wir noch
Christen sein?_

[71] _Cf._ J.S. Mackenzie's _Outlines of Metaphysics_ on the
various constructions of the Universe and of Life. The whole volume
is of the greatest value. _Cf._ also A.E. Taylor's illuminating
volume, _Elements of Metaphysics_.

[72] Cf. _Der Kampf um einen geistigen Lebensinhalt_, S. 98 ff.

[73] _Cf._ Wicksteed's remarkable address _The Religion of Time and
the Religion of Eternity_, already referred to. There are some
striking similarities between Eucken and Wicksteed, who have,
however, worked each quite independently of one another.

[74] Men of science themselves feel this, and are conscious of the
one-sidedness of the results of the scientific side of materialism.

[75] _The Truth of Religion_, p. 103.

[76] _Die Lebensanschauungen der grossen Denker_, 9te Auflage,
1911, S. 504.

[77] Liebmann passed away in January 1912. He had been Eucken's
colleague in Jena for many years. Windelband designates him as "the
truest of Kantians and the Nestor of Philosophy." _Cf._ my article
on his life and work in the _Nation_ for February 3, 1912. The best
presentation in England of the Kantian philosophy and its
development is to be found in Caird's _Critical Philosophy of Kant_
and Adamson's _Development of Modern Philosophy. Cf_. also G. Dawes
Hicks's valuable articles in the _Proceedings of the Aristotelian
Society_ during the past ten years.

[78] _Analysis der Wirklichkeit_,3te Auflage, 1900, S. vii.

[79] _Cf._ Dilthey's _Erlebnis und Dichtung_; his article "Die
Typen der Weltanschauung und ihre Ausbildung in den metaphysichen
Systemen" in _Weltanschauung_; _Philosophie und Religion in
Darstellungen_, 1911 also, "Das Wesen der Philosophie" in
_Systematische Philosophie_ ("Kultur der Gegenwart").

[80] _Cf._ Eucken's _Hauptprobleme der Religionsphilosophie der
Gegenwart_, 5te Auflage, 1912, chapter iv. Also, _Erkennen und
Leben_ (1912), ss. 35-51.

[81] _The Truth of Religion_, p. 574. Many hints in this and other
respects may be found in W.R. Boyce Gibson's valuable work, _Rudolf
Eucken's Philosophy of Life_(3rd edition, 1912).

[82] _The Truth of Religion_, p. 71.

[83] "Gesammelte Aufsätze": _Die Bedeutung der kleiner Nationen_,
pp. 47-52.

[84] This truth is pointed out most forcibly by L.P. Jacks in his
_Alchemy of Thought_, chap. i.

[85] Eucken visited England for the first time during Whitsun-week
1911. He had been invited by the Committee of the British and
Foreign Unitarian Association to deliver in London the _Essex Hall
Lecture_ for the year. A large audience gathered together to see
and hear him, and he received a most cordial reception. He spoke in
German on _Religion and Life_, and the lecture has since appeared
in English. The Rev. Charles Hargrove, M.A., of Leeds (President of
the Association) presided over the meeting, and spoke of the great
importance of Eucken's growing influence. Interesting addresses
were also delivered by Dr J. Estlin Carpenter, Principal of
Manchester College, Oxford; and Dr P.T. Forsyth, Principal of
Hackney College. At the luncheon which followed, Professor
Westermarck, Dr R.F. Horton, and others spoke. The lecture was
repeated at Manchester College, Oxford, during the same week. On
Whitsunday Eucken preached in the evening at Unity Church,
Islington, London, N., at the invitation of the writer of this
volume.

In September 1912 Eucken sailed for the United States of America to
deliver a course of lectures at Harvard University covering a
period of six months.

In both countries he was greeted by a large number of his old
pupils, many of whom travelled long distances to see and hear him
once more.

[86] Eucken follows Kant in the fact that after the union of
subject and object has taken place a _new kind of objectivity_ has
to be taken into account. This result has to be admitted before
knowledge becomes possible at all. Eucken has not dealt in a
thorough manner with this problem, although several hints are given
concerning the importance of this transcendental aspect in Kant's
philosophy. The implications of such a _new_ kind of objectivity
avoid the danger of subjectivism, on the one hand, and of
empiricism on the other hand. Eucken's forthcoming _Theory of
Knowledge_ will deal with this important matter. In _Erkennen und
Leben_ certain aspects of the problem are touched.

[87] The volume was translated into English and published in the
United States of America by Stuart Phelps in 1880. I am not aware
that the work exercised any great influence at the time either in
England or America. Eucken's "day" had not then dawned.

* * * * *

INDEX OF NAMES

Adamson, R. Adickes. Aristotle.

Balfour, A.J. Bergson. Boehme. Bosanquet, B. Boutroux. Bradley, F.H.

Caird, E. Carpenter, E. Carpenter, J. Estlin. Class, G. Copernicus.

Darwin. Descartes. Dilthey, W. Driesch, H.

Fichte. Fischer, Kuno. Forsyth, P.T.

Galileo.

Gibson, W.R.B. Goethe. Green, T.H.

Haeckel. Haldane. Hargrove. Harnack. Hartmann, Ed. von. Hegel.

Hicks, G. Dawes. Höffding, H. Horton, R.F. Hügel, F. von. Husserl. Huxley.

Jacks, L.P. James, W. Jesus, _cf._ chapters on Historical Religions and Christianity.

Kade, R. Kant.

Liebmann, Otto. Lipps. Lodge, O. Lotze. Luther.

MacDougall, W. Mach, E. Mackenzie, J.S. Meredith, G. Morgan, T.H. Münsterberg, H.

Nettleship, R.L. Ostwald, W.

Paul. Paulsen, F. Phelps, Stuart. Plato. Plotinus.

Reinke. Reuter. Rickert, H. Royce, J. Runeberg.

Savonarola. Schäfer, E.A. Schelling. Schiller. Schiller, F.C.S. Schopenhauer. Siebeck, H. Simmel, G. Socrates. Sorley, W.R.

Taylor, A.E. Thomson, J.A. Trendelenberg. Troeltsch, E.

Vaihinger Volkelt.

Wallace, W. Ward, J. Westermarck, E. Wicksteed, P.H. Windelband, W. Wundt, W.