Chapter II: Preface

The following pages aim at presenting in brief compass a selection
of the evidence upon which the hypothesis of thought-transference,
or telepathy, is based. It is now more than twelve years since
the Society for Psychical Research was founded, and nearly eight
since the publication of _Phantasms of the Living_. Both in the
periodical _Proceedings_ of the Society and in the pages of Edmund
Gurney's book,[1] a large mass of evidence has been laid before
the public. But the papers included in the _Proceedings_ are
interspersed with other matter, some of it too technical for the
taste of the general reader; whilst the two volumes of _Phantasms
of the Living_, which have for some time been out of print, were
too costly for the purse of some, and too bulky for the patience of
others. The attention which, notwithstanding these drawbacks, that
work excited on its first appearance, the friendly reception which
it met with in many quarters, and the fact that a considerable
edition has been disposed of, encouraged the hope that a book on
somewhat similar lines, but on a smaller scale, might be of service
to those--and their number has probably increased within the last
few years--who take a genuine interest in this inquiry. Accordingly
in the autumn of 1892 I obtained permission from the Council of the
Society for Psychical Research to make full use, in the compilation
of the present work, not merely of the evidence already published
by us, but of the not inconsiderable mass of unpublished records in
the possession of the Society.

It will be seen that the present book has little claim to novelty
of design; but it is not merely an abridged edition of the larger
work referred to. On the one hand it has a somewhat wider scope,
and includes accounts of telepathic clairvoyance and other
phenomena which did not enter into the scheme of Mr. Gurney's book.
On the other hand, the bulk of the illustrative cases here quoted
have been taken from more recent records; and, in particular,
certain branches of the experimental work have assumed a quite
new importance within the last few years. Thus the experiments
conducted by Mrs. Henry Sidgwick at Brighton have strengthened
the demonstration of thought-transference, and have gone far to
solve one or two of the problems connected with the subject; and
the evidence for the experimental production of telepathic effects
at a distance has been greatly enlarged by the work of MM. Janet
and Gibert,[2] Richet, Gibotteau, Schrenck-Notzing, and in this
country by Mr. Kirk and others.[3] It may be added that some of
the criticisms called forth by _Phantasms of the Living_, and our
own further researches, have led us to modify our estimate of
the evidence in some directions, and to strengthen generally the
precautions taken against the unconscious warping of testimony.

To say, however, that the following pages owe much to Edmund
Gurney is but to acknowledge the obligation which all students
of the subject must recognise to his keen and vigorous intellect
and his colossal industry. My own debt is a more personal one. To
have worked under his guidance, and to have been stimulated by his
example, was an invaluable schooling in the qualities demanded by
an inquiry of this nature. Of the living, I owe grateful thanks,
in the first instance, to Professor and Mrs. Henry Sidgwick, who
have read through the whole of the book in typescript, and have
given help and counsel throughout. Miss Alice Johnson, Mr. F. W.
H. Myers, the late Dr. A. T. Myers, Miss Porter, and others have
also given me welcome help in various directions. In acknowledging
this assistance, however, it is right to add that, though I trust
in my estimate of the evidence presented, and in the general tenour
of the conclusions suggested, to find myself, with few exceptions,
in substantial agreement with my colleagues, yet I have no claim to
represent the Society for Psychical Research, nor right to cloak my
own shortcomings with the authority of others.

One word more needs to be said. The evidence, of which samples are
presented in the following pages, is as yet hardly adequate for the
establishment of telepathy as a fact in nature, and leaves much to
be desired for the elucidation of the laws under which it operates.
Any contributions to the problem, in the shape either of accounts
of experiments, or of recent records of telepathic visions and
similar experiences, will be gladly received by me on behalf of the
Society for Psychical Research, at 19 Buckingham Street, Adelphi,
W.C.

FRANK PODMORE.

_August 1894._

FOOTNOTES:

[Footnote 1: The book actually bore on the title-page the names of Edmund Gurney, F. W. H. Myers, and the present writer. But the division of authorship, as explained in the Preface, was as follows:--"As regards the writing and the views expressed, Mr. Myers is solely responsible for the Introduction, and for the 'Note on a Suggested Mode of Psychical Interaction;' and Mr. Gurney is solely responsible for the remainder of the book.... But the collection, examination, and appraisal of evidence has been a joint labour."]

[Footnote 2: Some account of the earlier experiments by MM. Janet and Gibert was included in the supplementary chapter at the end of the second volume of _Phantasms_.]

[Footnote 3: See Chapters V. and X. of the present book.]

APPARITIONS AND THOUGHT-TRANSFERENCE.