Chapter III: Introduction: 1. Of the nature of the poet

"We are (often) so impressed by the power of poetry that we think of it as something made by a wonderful and unusual person: we do not realize the fact that all the wonder and marvel is in our own brains, that the poet is ourselves. He speaks our language better than we do merely because he is more skilful with it than we are; his skill is part of our skill, his power of our power; generations of English-speaking men and women have made us sensible to these things, and our sensibility comes from the same source that the poet's power of stimulating it comes from. Given a little more sensitiveness to external stimuli, a little more power of associating ideas, a co-ordination of the functions of expression somewhat more apt, a sense of rhythm somewhat keener than the average--given these things we should be poets, too, even as he is.... _He is one of us._"

2. _Of what English poetry consists_:

"English poetry is not a rhythm of sound, but a rhythm of ideas, and the flow of attention-stresses (_i.e._, varying qualities of words and cadence) which determines its beauty is inseparably connected with the thought; for each of them is a judgment of identity, or a judgment of relation, or an expression of relation, and not a thing of mere empty sound.... He who would think of it as a pleasing arrangement of vocal sounds has missed all chance of ever understanding its meaning. There awaits him only the barren generalities of a foreign prosody, tedious, pedantic, fruitless. And he will flounder ceaselessly amid the scattered timbers of its iambuses, spondees, dactyls, tribrachs, never reaching the firm ground of truth."

"AN INTRODUCTION TO THE SCIENTIFIC STUDY OF ENGLISH POETRY,"[1]
_by_ MARK LIDDELL.

[1] _Published by Grant Richards (1902). This remarkable book,
establishing English poetry as a thing governed from within by
its own necessities, and not by rules of aesthetics imposed on
it from without, formulates principles which, unperceived,
have governed English poetry from the earliest times, which
find their greatest exemplar in Shakespeare, and which, though
beginning to be realized by the less pedantic of the moderns,
are in its pages for the first time lucidly expounded
and--such is their adequacy--can, in the end, only be regarded
as indubitably proven._--R. M. B. N., 1917.

* * * * *