Chapter XIV: Appendix: D

DEPOSITIONS AGAINST GILLES

_The Depositions in the Civil Court_

Peronne Loessart of Rochebernart, makes oath that the Baron de Retz, on returning from Vannes with his retinue, stopped in her town, at the Hotel of Jean Colin, in the immediate neighbourhood of her house. She had a son ten years of age then going to school whom one of the retinue of Gilles, called Poitou, desired to obtain as his page. It was agreed that he should have four pounds (_livres_) for his services, and Peronne, _cent souls_ (_sous_), five francs, for a dress, and Poitou should continue the boy at school. A pony was bought from the hotel-keeper for the boy to ride, and he departed on the morrow in the company. She talked with Gilles de Retz, and he commended her wisdom in placing the boy, and assured her it would be for her and his advantage. She had never seen her son afterwards, though this had taken place two years before. On a future journey, she had met the servants of Gilles, and on demanding news of her son, was informed that he was either at Tiffauges or Pouzauges.

(Signed) DE TOUSCHERONDE.[5]

[5] The depositions were all signed by Touscheronde and some
other.

Jean Colin, his wife Olive, and her mother, support Peronne, and Colin says that he sold Poitou a pony for the sum of LX s., on which the boy was mounted and departed with the rest of the company.

Jean le Meignen, his wife, Allain Dulis, Perrot Dupouez, Guillaume Ganton, Guillaume Portuys, Jean le Fevre, clerc, all of Saint Étienne de Montluc (Loire-Inférieure) depose on their oaths that since about three years ago they had known a Guillaume Brice of their parish. He was a mendicant and had a son about eight or nine years of age named Jamet; that the father was now dead about one year; that last Saint John’s day the said child disappeared and had never been heard of since in the neighbourhood. No one knew what had become of him. He was last seen near the wood of Saint Étienne, and Dupouez says that about the same time he met a woman of fifty or sixty years, hardened and strong, with a visage _vermaillé_ (bronzed), supposed to be _la Meffraye_, who, it was believed, had abducted the boy. She was making her way towards Nantes.

Guillaume Fouraige, his wife Jehanne, the wife of Jean le Flou, Richarde, wife of Jean Gaudeau, from the Port de Launay near Coueron (Loire-Inférieure), record on their oaths the loss of the son, an infant of about twelve years, of Jean Bernart, their neighbour; that he started in the direction of Machecoul to ask alms (on a begging expedition) from which he had never returned, nor had anybody in their neighbourhood ever received news of him. The woman, Fouraige, told of meeting or seeing an old woman with a gray gown and black bonnet (supposed to be _Meffraye_) with a young boy in her company, who said she was on her way to Machecoul. In two or three days she returned alone. Being asked what had become of the child, she responded that she had placed him to live with a good master.

28, 29, and 30 September, 1440.

André Barbe, shoemaker, living at Machecoul, says that since Easter he has heard that the son of Georget le Barbier has been lost; that he (the witness) had seen the boy on a certain day gathering apples in the rear of the hotel Rondeau, and since that time he had never been seen in the neighbourhood; that the mothers of the neighbourhood had great fear for the loss of their children and guarded them very closely. He had been at Saint Jean d’Angely where some of the residents demanded whence he came, and when he said “from Machecoul,” they responded, “That is the place where they eat the small children.” He recounts the loss of several other children from his neighbourhood: Guillaume Jeudon, Jehannot Roucin, Alexandre Chastelier. He had heard at the church of Trinity de Machecoul, a stranger in search of his child of seven years, who had been gone for eight months or more.

Jehannet, wife of Guillaume Sergent, of Saint Croix de Machecoul, said that during the Pentecost a year before, she and her husband went to dig the field to sow hemp, leaving in their house a son of eight years to care for a baby one and a-half years. On their return the boy was gone and has never been heard of seen since.

Georget le Barbier, living near the gates of the Château de Machecoul, deposed that he had a son named Guillaume, of the age of eighteen years, that about the fête of Saint Barnabas he went after dinner to Machecoul to play _pelote_; that since vespers of the day on which he had played _pelote_ he had never been seen or heard of, although he, the father, had made every investigation and demand possible. He further says it is notorious and the people murmur, saying that infants are murdered in the said château. He has also heard that the boy who was page of Monsieur François Prelati, and who lived with him, was also lost.

Guillaume Hylairet, and his wife Jehanne, living at Machecoul, have heard say that the son of the said Georget le Barbier had been lost, and no one knew where he was or what had become of him. They say, further, that about eight or seven years ago they had living with them a child of twelve years, the son of Jean Jeudon, as an apprentice to learn the trade of furrier; that Gilles de Sillé, accompanied by Roger de Briqueville, had asked to send the boy to the château of Machecoul with a message, which was accordingly done; that the boy never returned and was never seen or heard of in the neighbourhood; that upon his demand, made to Sillé and Briqueville, as to what had become of the boy, they responded that he was possibly at Tiffauges, but thought some of the _larrons_ (thieves) had carried him off to be their page; that he, the witness, knew of the loss of the infants of Jehannet Roucin and Alexandre Chastelier; that he had heard the parents complain of their loss _doloreusement_. Guillaume says that about five years since he heard a man, Jean du Jardin, then living with Monsieur Roger de Briqueville, say that they had found at the castle of Champtocé a caskful, _toute plaine_, of the bodies of dead infants; that it was common and notorious talk that these infants were murdered at the château of Machecoul; that he has heard the same complaint made by others, of the _perdicion d’autres enffants_.

Jehan Thipholoz, Sr., Jehan Thifoloz, Jr., Jouhan Aubin, Clemens Doré, of Tonaye (Charente-Inférieure) have heard the complaints of Mathelin Thouars, of the same parish, for about half a year, that his son, a child about twelve years, had been lost, and that he had no knowledge of his whereabouts, nor could he obtain any news of him.

Jehan Roucin, of Machecoul, says that about nine years ago his son, a child then about nine years of age, was in the field guarding the cattle; at night he did not return, and has never returned, nor have they ever had any news of him. They were told by a neighbour, since dead, that she had seen Gilles de Sillé with a tabart and an estamine (a sort of cloak and veil) going to and speaking with the child, whom he conducted to the postern-gate of the château; that the complaints of their neighbours, especially Jeudon, of the loss of their infants, are notorious.

Johanne, widow of Hemery Edelin, and previous wife of Jehan Bonneau, of Machecoul, says that she had a son of the age of eight years, going to school; that he lived with his grandmother near the château. About eight years ago her child was lost and has never been heard of since; that she knew the boy Roucin, and another of Geudon, which were lost; that about fifteen days after, another child, that of Macé Sorin, was also lost; that this created a great clamour, upon which it was explained that these children, with others, had been captured to serve as hostages with the English, for the deliverance of Monsieur Michel de Sillé, then prisoner, and it was said that the ransom of the said Michel had been fixed by the English at twenty-four male infants. About two or three years before, the witness had seen, at Machecoul, a stranger from Saint Mesme, near Chinon, who was crying piteously, complaining of the _perdicion_ of his child, but no news had ever been heard. She had heard the same complaint from a couple named Aisé or d’Aysée. She had also heard of the loss of many other infants in Brittany, of which great complaint had been made; that seven alone had been lost from Tiffauges; that they had all been taken from the fields while guarding the cattle, and no one knew what had become of them or what to do about finding them.

Macé Sorin and his wife recount the loss of several of the foregoing, of whom nothing had ever been heard, and that it was presumed that they had been taken by the English for the ransom and deliverance of Michel de Sillé, prisoner.

Perrine, the wife of Clemens Rondeau, of Machecoul, declared that Monsieur François Prelati, and the Marquis de Ceva, while part of the retinue of the Baron de Retz, were lodged in a chamber of her house; that she heard the Marquis say to François that he had found a handsome page at Dieppe, at which François was joyful; that the page came to live with the said François, and was there for about fifteen days. Upon her demand of François as to where the boy had gone, and what had become of him, François responded that he had been deceived in him and had sent him away. That François and Eustache Blanchet also occupied another small house in the neighbourhood belonging to Perrot Cahn; that on the descent of Jean l’Abbé there had been found in the chamber the powdered bones of an infant, or infants, and she had seen an infant’s bloody chemise, which gave forth a bad odour.

André Brechet, of the Parish of Saint Croix de Machecoul, says that about a year and half before he was a watchman, or was watching at the castle of Machecoul, and after midnight he fell asleep; he was awakened by a contest on the wall in which a large man had his naked dagger, and said to the little one by his side, “You are dead” (_Tu est mort_); that he, the witness, was filled with great fear and quietly escaped.

Ysabeau, wife of Guillaume Hamelin, makes oath that about seven days before the end of the past year, she sent her two sons--one fifteen years, the other seven, or thereabouts--to the town of Machecoul to purchase bread, giving them the money therefor; that they never returned, and she has never had any news of or from them. She reports having heard a similar story from Micheau Bouer and his wife, who had also lost one of their infants, who had never since been seen. She was supported in the testimony of her loss by Perrot Pasqueteau, Jehan Soreau, Katerine de Grepie, Guillaume Garnier, Perrine wife of Jehan Caeffin, Jehanne wife of Estienne Landays, and Perrot Soudan.

Guillemete, wife of Micheau Bouer, declares upon her oath that seven days after Easter last, her son of eight years, a beautiful white infant, _bel enffant et blanc_, went to Machecoul; that he never returned and they have never received any news, however many searches she and her husband have made. That on the day after they had given charity at Machecoul for the deceased Mahé Le Breton, she, who was guarding the cattle as they grazed, was approached by a large man, in black, who, among other things, asked of her where were the children who usually guarded the cattle. She said that they had gone to Machecoul, when he departed in that direction.

Guillaume Rodigo, living at Bourgneuf-en-Rais, testifies to the loss of his apprentice, aged fifteen years. Marguerite Sorin, chambermaid for Rodigo, tells how, as she and the boy were playing some games together in the house after supper, Poitou came and, taking the boy apart, talked to him in a low voice. On his departure she interrogated the boy as to what was said, but he refused to tell. Soon after he left the house in his doublet without saying where he was going. Since then she has never seen him or heard any news of him. They were supported by Guillaume Plumet and his wife, and Michel Gerart.

Thomas Aysée and his wife, living at Machecoul, declare that at the last fête of Pentecost they sent their son of ten years to ask alms at the castle, and that they have never seen their son since; he has never returned. They heard, from a girl, that she had seen the son at the château, along with others who were also asking alms; that alms were given first to the girls and then to the boys; that this girl said she had heard one of the men of the castle say to this boy that he had not had any meat (that is, to eat), and invite him into the castle to be fed, whereupon both entered and the boy was seen no more.

Jannette, the wife of Eucasse (Eustache?) Douret, of Saint Ligier, declares on oath that about fifteen days before Christmas last, having heard that the Baron de Retz would give alms, according to the custom in her own town, she sent her two boys, one of ten years, the other of seven, and though some of her neighbours had seen them on the way, and at the town of Machecoul, she had never seen them since, and although she and her husband had made every search, they had obtained no news.

October 2, 1440.

Jehan de Grepie, Regnaud Donété, of the parish of Notre Dame of Nantes, says under oath, that about Saint John’s day, two years past, she lost a child of about twelve years while on his way to school, and since then she had never seen him. The only news had been that Perrine Martin, a prisoner in Nantes, had confessed that she had taken the said child to the Baron de Retz in his chamber, at his Hôtel de la Suze in Nantes; that the said Baron had commanded her to take the child to Machecoul and deliver him to the porter, and this she had done. That she had heard Jean Hubert and Denis de Lemyon, acquaintances of his, complain each one of having lost a son; that at the time of the loss of his son, Gilles de Retz was at his Hôtel de la Suze in Nantes, and that the said Perrine lived near him. The witness made complaint to various of the servants and followers of Gilles at his said house (Hôtel de la Suze) and she was always told that they thought his son had gone to Machecoul to become a page.

Jean Jenvret and his wife, of Nantes, declare their loss of a son of nine years in the same way, and by the same person as told by Donété.

Jean Hubert and his wife, of Saint Leonart, in Nantes, declare that on Thursday after Saint John’s day last, two years ago, they lost their son, fourteen years of age; that he made the acquaintance of some of the men servants, or followers of Gilles de Retz; that he talked with his mother of the promises they had made if he would enter the service with them. He recounted how he had seen the Baron de Retz in his chamber and waited upon him, for which he had received a present of some cake which he had brought to his mother; that after his permanent entry into the service of the Baron, and his departure from Nantes, they had never seen or heard of him more.

Agaice, wife of Denis de Lemion, says that about a year and a half before, her nephew of the age of eighteen years, who frequented the Hôtel de la Suze, where resided the Baron de Retz, was approached by one of his men, or servants, with an offer to enter the service of the Baron, which he did, and has never returned or been heard of since.

Jehanne, wife of Guibelet Delit, declares that during the Easter holidays, she lost a child of seven years; that he frequented la Suze, where a man named Cherpy had persuaded him to join the service of the Baron de Retz. This done, she had never seen or had news of her child.

Jehan Toutblanc, of Saint Étienne de Montluc, records that at Saint Julian a year ago, on departing from his house, he left it in charge of a young ward of fourteen years, named Jean also, for whom he was tutor. On his return from his journey, he could not find the boy, has never seen him, nor heard any news from him.

Jean Fougere, of Saint Donacien, near Nantes, records that about two years since he lost his son of twelve years, a well-favoured boy, and that since that time he has had no news as to what became of him.

Jean Ferot, Guillaume Jacob, Perrin Blanchet, Thomas Beauvis, Eonnet Jehan, Denis de Lemyon, of the parish of Notre Dame, of Nantes, record under their oaths, their knowledge concerning the loss of the sons of Jean Hubert, Régnaud Donété, and Guillaume Avril, that complaints and public clamour have been heard by these witnesses for two years and a half; that for one year past it has been commonly said that the Baron de Retz abducts infants in order to slay them.

Nicole, wife of Vincent Bonnereau; Philipe, wife of Mathis Ernaut; Jehanne, wife of Guillaume Prieur, all of the parish of Saint Croix of Nantes, support the claim of Jean Jenvret and his wife as to the loss of their son of nine years, and that for a year and a half they have heard by common report that _le sire de Retz_ and his men capture and kill small children. They have also heard of the loss of the young son of Eonnet de Villeblanche, and that for three months past he has not been seen in his neighbourhood nor heard from.

October 6, 1440.

Jean Estaisse and Michele, his wife, testify to the loss of a boy of the age of eleven years named Perrot Dagaie. Relate the notoriety of the rumour that the Baron de Retz and his men capture and kill infants.

Jean Chiquet, parchment-maker, testifies to the evil reputation of the Baron de Retz and his men in abducting children.

Pierre Badieu, cloth merchant of Chanteloup, testifies to the abduction of two children aged about nine years, the infants of Robin Pavot.

Jean Darel describes his son, who, while the father was sick in bed, was captured in the Rue du Mercheil, where he was playing with other children; that he has no knowledge by whom or where he was taken; that he has never seen or heard of him since.

Jehanne, wife of Darel, says that on the day of Saint Père (or Pierre) June 29th, one year ago, there was abducted from her place in the city of Nantes, her son, Olivier, seven or eight years of age, since which time she has never seen him nor had any news of him. Her mother describes the abduction by saying that she was coming from vespers, leading the child; that near the church of Saint Saturnine, when in the crowd, somebody made away with the child; that she and all his relatives sought for him in every direction, but they have never seen or heard of him since.

Eonnette, wife of Jean Bremant, supports the foregoing witnesses as to the abduction of Olivier.

Nichole, wife of Jean Hubert, of the parish of Saint Vincent, had a son named Jean of fourteen years of age, who was lost or abducted as described by her husband aforesaid. She sustains him in his testimony.

Jean Bureau and his wife, Johanne, Thebault Geoffroi and her daughter, and Guillaume Hemeri, support the claim of the abduction of the Hubert child.

De la Grepie, Régnaud Donété, Jean Ferot and his wife, Pierres Blanchett, and Guillaume Jacob, all support the claim of the abduction of the apprentice, Donété, heretofore described.

INDEX

A

Abduction of children by Gilles de Retz, chap. iv., 64–71, 106, 195

Aids, assistants, and familiars of Gilles, 71–75

Allegiance to Duke of Brittany, 11

Ancient buildings, description of, 46, 47;
inscriptions on, 47

Appendix A, Mother Goose publications, 188

Appendix B, Bluebeard stories, 186

Appendix C, _Mystery of the Siege of Orleans_, 189

Appendix D, Depositions in Civil Court against Gilles, 195

Army service of Gilles, in histories of France, 22, 23

Arrest of Gilles, 84–90

Attack and capture of Rainefort, 17

B

Beaumanoir, duel with Tournemine, 169

Bishop of Nantes, 80–84, 93–95, 100–116, 122, 127, 139

Blouyn, Jean, Vice-Inquisitor, 95, 100, 102, 105, 140

Bluebeard, an infantile classic, ix., xiv.;
stories of, Appendix B, 186

“Bonne Vierge de Créé-Lait,” niche and statue of, 179

Bouffay, Palais de Justice, 169;
duel between Beaumanoir and Tournemine in courtyard of, 169

C

Cathedral of Nantes, 45

Château of Champtoceaux captured and John V. released, 11

Château of Malicorne captured, 17

Château de Clisson transferred to Gilles, 12

Château de Nantes, 90–92 (frontispiece);
Edict of Nantes signed by Henry IV. in, 91;
prisoners in: Cardinal of Retz, Minister Fouché, Madam Sevigné, and
Duchess of Berry, 92

Citation to Gilles, 82–84

Confession of Gilles, 135–159

Coronation of the King, 20;
Gilles guard for the Sainte Ampoule at, 20

Court, officers of, 94–97, 130;
opening of, 100;
presided over by Bishop of Nantes and assistants, 93;
records of, 98–101, 105–108;
Appendix D, 195

Craon, Marie de, mother of Gilles, 3

Crimes of Gilles, chap. iv., 64–93

Criminal law in France and other countries, history of, 96

Criminal practice in France, 131–133

D

Declaration of infamy against Gilles, 80–82

Decree of excommunication, 124, 164;
revoked, 126, 165;
in writing, 129

Depositions against Gilles, 105;
Appendix D, 195

Duel between Beaumanoir and Tournemine, 169

DUKE OF BRITTANY:
Alliance of, with France, 15–16
l’Abbé, Jean, captain in service of, arrests Gilles, 84, 90
Blois, family of, John V., 9
Decree of King against Gilles refused by, 60
Defeat of Blois, peace with Montfort, 9
Favors bishop against Gilles, 84, 85
France, alliance with and war for, 15, 16;
history of, 13–23
Gilles’s father and family on side of Blois, 9
Imprisonment of, in Château de Champtoceaux, 11;
release of, 11, 15
Montfort against Penthièvres and Blois, 9
Nantes, château of, castle for the Duke, 90, 92
Penthièvres and Blois condemned and banished, 12, 13
Son of a younger son _vs._ daughter of an elder son, 9
War for the succession of, 9, 11

E

Education of Gilles, 6–8

Espousal of cause of King of France by Gilles, 15

Evidence against Gilles, 105;
Appendix D, 195

Excommunication of Gilles, 124, 126, 129, 165

Execution of Gilles, x., chap. vii., 177

Expenses greater than income, resorts to magic, 62, 63

Extravagance of Gilles, 39, 40, 50–53, 55, 57, 60

F

Family of Gilles, _see_ Gilles de Retz

Folly and ambition of Gilles, 39, 40

France, alliance with Brittany, 15, 16;
history of, 13–23

Friends and companions of Gilles, 17

G

GILLES DE RETZ:
Abduction of children by, 64, 71, 106, 195
Aids and assistants, familiars of: Eustache Blanchet, Henriet
Griart, Jean Roussignol, Gilles de Sillé, Perrin Martin
_alias_ LaMeffraye, François Prelati, Hugues de Bremont,
Étienne Corrilaut _alias_ Poitou, Robin Romulart, 71–75
Allegiance of, to Duke of Brittany, 11
Army service of, in histories of France, 22, 23
Arrest of, 84–90
Attack and capture of Rainefort by, 17;
of Lamballe, Guingamp, Broon, Malicorne;
Champtoceaux captured and demolished and John V. released by, 11
Château de Clisson transferred to, 12
Citation to, 82–84
Coronation of the King, guard for the Sainte Ampoule at, 20
Crimes of, chap. iv., 64–93
Declaration of infamy against, 80, 82
Education of, 6–8
Espouses cause of King of France, 15
Expenses greater than income, resorts to magic and philosopher’s
stone, 62, 83
Family of, (Laval [Montmorency-Laval], Rais [changed to Retz, 1581],
Machecoul, Craon), 1
Father, Guy, 1–3;
death of, 4
Mother, Marie de Craon, 3;
remarriage of, 4
Brother, René de la Suze, 4
Wife, Catherine de Thouars, 5;
separated from, 61;
remarriage of, 180
Daughter, Marie, married, 180;
died, 180
Grandfather, paternal, Guy Bremor, 2, 10
Grandfather, maternal, Jean de Craon, 2, 4
Grandmother, a sister of great Du Guesclin, 2
Great-grandmother, Jeanne _la Folle_, 2
After execution of, 180, 181
Folly and ambition of, 39, 40
Friends and companions in arms of:
Ambroise de Loré, Baron Beaumanoir, La Hire, 17
Joan of Arc, Gilles is captain of guard for, and in service with,
through France, ix., 9, 19, Appendix C, 189
Life of, at home in Brittany (1430–1439), 24–63
Life, pleasure, business, etc., of, 27
Magic, resorts to, in aid of his failing fortunes, 61–63
Maison de la Suze, expensive decoration of, 55
Marriage of, 6
First and second betrothals, fiancées both die, 5
Married to Catherine de Thouars, 5
Wife’s dot, 5
Marshal of France, 19
Music, fondness for, 27
Personal appearance of, 24–27
Property of, raided by Margaret de Clisson, 12
Lands inherited, 2, 5, 28, 29
Sales and transfers, 30–32
Value of, estimated, 30, 39, 41, 50, 53, 55, 56, 60
Religious hierarchy of, bishop, chapel, paraphernalia, etc., 27, 28,
41, 48, 53, 54, 57, 58
Ruinous expenditures of, 39, 40, 50–53, 55, 57, 60
Search for Elixir of Youth and Philosopher’s stone, x.
Siege and capture of Orleans by, 19
Signature and rubric of, 22
Sixteen years old at commencement of civil war, 10, 13
Soldier (1420–1429), chap. ii., 19–23;
for France, 17
Spendthrift, 53
Submits to arrest, 86, 89, 100
Theatre, love for, and indulgence in, 33–50
Trial and execution of, x., chaps. v.–vii., 93–182
Before Ecclesiastical Tribunal, chap. v., 93–166
Before Civil Court, chap, v., 167
Depositions, Ecclesiastical Court, 105;
Civil Court, Appendix D, 195
Jean Blouyn, Vice-Inquisitor and aid to Bishop, commission of, 102,
103
Officers of court, 94, 95, 97, 130
Opening of court, 100
Presided over by Bishop of Nantes and assistants, 93
Records of, 98–101, 105–108, Appendix D, 195

Guard of honour at coronation of King, 20

I

Infamy, declaration of, against Gilles, 80–82

J

Joan of Arc, ix., 19, 21–23

L

La Hire, prayer of, before assault on Montargis, 18

Laval, original family name, changed to Rais by will of Joan la
Sage, 3

M

Machecoul, château of, 1, 2, 5, 29

Magic, resort of Gilles to, to aid his failing fortunes, 61–63

Maison de la Suze, Nantes, 46;
decoration of, 55

Marshal of France, Gilles made, 19

_Mémoires des Héritiers_, 28
Gives lists of Gilles’s lands and from what family inherited, 28, 29
Inaugurated by his brother and cousin, 28, 29
Interdiction of sale or transfer by the King, 55–61
Sales and transfers of property by Gilles, 30–32
Sentence of the King under, 55–61
Value of his property estimated in, 30, 39, 41, 50, 53, 55, 56, 60

Montargis, siege of, 18

Mother Goose publications, 183

Music, Gilles’s fondness for, 27

_Mystery of the Siege of Orleans_, 41–43;
Appendix C, 189;
of Lord Jesus Christ and the Virgin Mary, 43–49

N

Notices, public, made in France by trumpet or drum, 43–45, 60

O

Orleans, expensive visit of Gilles to, 50–52

P

PERRAULT, CHARLES:
Author of the story of Bluebeard, xi.
Identity of Gilles de Retz with Bluebeard, xiv.
Life and history of, xi.
Member of Academy of France, xii.
Mother Goose stories, first publication of, by, xiii.;
names of, xiii.
Writings of, xi., xiii.

Personal appearance of Gilles, 24–26

Pierre de l’Hospital, Chief Justice of Brittany, 93, 135–138, 168,
174, 175

Portraits of Gilles, 24

Prairie de Piesse, place of execution, 175

Prelati, François, alchemist, 73, 127, 139, 167, 168

Property of Gilles:
Lands inherited, 2, 5, 28, 29
Raided by Margaret de Clisson, 12
Sales and transfers of, 30–32
Value estimated, 30, 39, 41, 50, 53, 55, 56, 60

R

Records of trial in archives of Loire-Inférieure, 98–100, 170

Religious hierarchy (pseudo), 27, 28, 41, 48, 53, 54, 57, 58

René de la Suze, brother of Gilles, 4, 28, 29

Retz changed from Rais in 1581, 1, 3

Richemont, Count of, Constable of France, 16

S

Sentence of Henriet and Poitou, 174;
of Gilles, 168, 175

Shahan, Dr. Thomas J., ix., xv.

Streets, decoration of, custom continued in France, 36, 37

Suze, Maison de la, 55

T

Theatre:
History of, in France, 32–38
Mysteries, moralities, dramas, and farces, 35–38
Religious plays, fostered by the clergy, 33–35
Streets decorated during, custom in France, 36, 37
Travelling shows in small towns in France, 35, 36

Three languages spoken in Brittany in time of Gilles, 7, 137, 172

Tiffauges, castle of, 75–78;
laboratory for magic and black art, used as, 78, 79

Torture of Gilles, order for, 134

Tournemine, duel with Beaumanoir, 169

Trial of Gilles by Ecclesiastical Court, chap. v., 93, 167
Address to public, 160–163
Acknowledges jurisdiction and admits guilt, 125
Bishop of Nantes presiding officer, 93
Blouyn, Jean, Vice-Inquisitor, aid to Bishop, 95, 100, 102, 105, 140
Confession of Gilles during, 137–159
Criminal law in France, history of, 96;
practice of, 131–133;
torture under, 134
Decree of excommunication, 124, 126, 129, 165
Depositions, 105–109
Excommunication, 124–126, 129, 165
Information against Gilles, 116, 123
Order for torture of Gilles, 134
Plea of “not guilty” entered, 127
Refusal to plead, of Gilles, 110–116, 123, 124
Sentence of Court, 163, 164
Three languages employed, 137, 172
Witnesses against Gilles, 105–109, 127

Trial of Gilles before Civil Court, chap. vi., 167–177
Bouffay, Palais de Justice, 169
Depositions, Appendix D, 195–206
Henriet, Griart, and Poitou tried with Gilles, 167
Palais de Justice, Place Bouffay, 169
Pierre de l’Hospital, presiding, 93, 135–138
Poitou tried with Henriet and Gilles, 167
Record of trial in archives at Nantes, 98–108, Appendix D, 195
Sentence of Gilles, Henriet, and Poitou, 174, 175

Transcriber’s Notes

Italic text is enclosed in _underscores_; small-caps text has been raised to ALL-CAPS; superscripted text is preceded by a caret ^e, and enclosed in braces ^{me} when more than one character in length.

Punctuation, hyphenation, and spelling were made consistent when a predominant preference was found in the original book; otherwise they were not changed.

Simple typographical errors were corrected; unbalanced quotation marks were remedied when the change was obvious, and otherwise left unbalanced.

The spellings of non-English words were not reviewed by Transcriber.

The Title page hyphenates “BLUE-BEARD”; the rest of the book does not.

Uncaptioned illustrations are decorative headpieces and tailpieces.

The index was not checked for proper alphabetization or correct page references.