Chapter III

Sainte-Beuve--I have read reasonably in his voluminous works, but without as yet happening on the passage which, quoted by Stevenson in his _Apology for Idlers_, really needs no verification by reference, being just an opinion dropped, and whoever dropped it and when, equally valuable to us--Sainte-Beuve, according to Stevenson, as he grew older, came to regard all experience as a single great book, in which to study for a few years before we go hence: and it seemed all one to him whether you should read in Chapter XX, which is the Differential Calculus, or in Chapter XXXIX, which is hearing the band play in the gardens. Note well, if you please, that I am not endorsing this as a word of advice for Tripos purposes. I am but applying it to Thackeray, who never sat for his degree, but left Cambridge to write _Vanity Fair_, _Pendennis_, _Esmond_, sundry other great stories, with several score of memorable trifles--ballads, burlesques, essays, lectures, _Roundabout Papers_, what-not. If I may again quote from Sir Walter Raleigh, “there are two Days of Judgment, of which a University examination in an Honours School is considerably the less important.” The learning we truly take away from a University is (as I conceive) the talent, whatever it be, we use (God helping), and turn to account. Says Mr. Charles Whibley of Thackeray’s two years here:

The friendships that he made ended only with his life, and he must
have been noble, indeed, who was the friend of Alfred Tennyson and
of Edward FitzGerald. Moreover, Cambridge taught him the literary
use of the university, as the Charterhouse had taught him the
literary use of a public school. In a few chapters of _Pendennis_
he sketched the life of an undergraduate, which has eluded all his
rivals save only Cuthbert Bede. He sketched it, moreover, in the
true spirit of boyish extravagance, which he felt at Cambridge and
preserved even in the larger world of London; and if Trinity and
the rustling gown of Mr. Whewell had taught him nothing more than
this, he would not have contemplated them in vain.

As a matter of fact, of course, the Charterhouse and Cambridge had taught him much more, even of scholarship. “Scholarship,” is, to be sure, a relative term which, if lifted to the excellent heights--to scorn lower degrees of comparison--(as heaven forbid it should not be) will exclude all who have so learnt their Horace at school that in after life merely to rehearse and patch together from memory an Ode of his, long ago learnt for “repetition,” brings comfort to the soul and can steel it, Romanly, under the stars even on Himalayan outposts. But if there be aught worthy the name of scholarship to have that one author bred into your bones--why, then, I challenge that Thackeray did carry away a modicum of scholarship (and a very pure modicum, too) from school and university. I shall come to his prose cadences by and by, and will say no more of them here than that--in _Esmond_ especially, but in general and throughout his prose--they are inconceivable by me save as the cadences of a writer early trained upon Greek and Latin. For blunter evidence, you will find the _Roundabout Papers_ redolent--in quotation, reminiscences, atmosphere--of Horace on every page; and for evidence yet more patent take his avowed imitation of Horace (_Odes_ i. 38), the two famous, jolly Sapphic stanzas beginning _Persicos odi_. Turn to your Conington (say) and you will find them most neatly and adequately rendered: and then take your Thackeray--

But a plain leg of mutton, my Lucy,
I prithee get ready at three;
Have it smoking and tender and juicy,
And what better meat can there be?

And when it has feasted the master,
’Twill amply suffice for the maid:
Meanwhile I will smoke my canaster,
And tipple my ale in the shade.

Years ago, I discoursed, standing here, on the Horatian Model in English Verse, attempting to show you how this man and that man--Andrew Marvell, for example, and Matthew Prior, had attempted it here and there and how nearly achieved it: of Milton, again, how he tried to build his Sonnet, redeeming it from the Petrarcan love-business upon the model of the Horatian Ode; how some sonnets of his (familiar or political--that _To Mr. Lawrence_ for instance, as a specimen in one mode, or those _To the Lady Margaret Ley_, or _On the Late Massacre in Piedmont_ as specimens in another) are deliberately, experimentally Horatian; and how narrowly--how very narrowly--William Cowper, by deflection of religious mania, missed to be our purest Horace of all. But Thackeray is of the band. To alter a word of Carlyle’s, “a beautiful vein of _Horace_ lay struggling about him.”