Chapter I: Front Matter (1)

</pre>

Produced by Marius Masi, Don Kretz and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net

Transcriber's notes:

(1) Numbers following letters (without space) like C2 were originally
printed in subscript. Letter subscripts are preceded by an
underscore, like C_n.

(2) Characters following a carat (^) were printed in superscript.

(3) Side-notes were relocated to function as titles of their respective
paragraphs.

(4) Macrons and breves above letters and dots below letters were not
inserted.

(5) The following typographical errors have been corrected:

ARTICLE EUBOEA: "The whole of the eastern coast is rocky and
destitute of harbours, especially the part called Coela, or 'the
Hollows,' where part of the Persian fleet was wrecked." 'Persian'
amended from 'Perisan'.

ARTICLE EUCHARIST: "'This is my blood of the covenant which is
poured out for many,' Matthew adding 'for the remission of sins,' a
phrase which savours of Heb. ix. 22:" 'Matthew' amended from
'Mathew'.

ARTICLE EUDAEMONISM: "The fundamental difficulty which confronts
those who would distinguish between pleasure and eudaemonia is that
all pleasure is ultimately a mental phenomenon ..." 'fundamental'
amended from 'fundametal'.

ARTICLE EUPHRATES: "... and the latter is still one of the chief
productions of the country, but in later years rice has taken the
place of wheat as the staff of life." 'productions' amended from
'poductions'.

ARTICLE EUROPE: "... Germany and Austria-Hungary, the slates of
Wales, Scotland and France, the kaolin of Germany, England and
France, and the abundant glass sands of Belgium, France and
Bohemia." 'abundant' amended from 'abundand'.

ARTICLE EUROPE: "Here the altitude is reduced to 3785 ft., about
3150 ft. below the summit-level of the pass, but the tunnel length
is increased to rather more than 91/4 m." 'summit' amended from
'sumit'.

ARTICLE EUROPE: "... and the Catholic Church had become 'more
united, less worldly [** amended from wordly]; and more dependent
on herself.'" 'worldly' amended from 'wordly'.

ARTICLE EUROPE: "Until the treaty of Tilsit had been signed in 1807
there was no visible growth of a national uprising in any part of
Europe." 'there' amended from 'these'.

ENCYCLOPAEDIA BRITANNICA

A DICTIONARY OF ARTS, SCIENCES, LITERATURE
AND GENERAL INFORMATION

ELEVENTH EDITION

VOLUME IX, SLICE VIII

Ethiopia to Evangelical Association

ARTICLES IN THIS SLICE:

ETHIOPIA EUONYMUS
ETHNOLOGY and ETHNOGRAPHY EUPALINUS
ETHYL EUPATORIA
ETHYL CHLORIDE EUPATRIDAE
ETHYLENE EUPEN
ETIENNE, CHARLES GUILLAUME EUPHEMISM
ETIQUETTE EUPHONIUM
ETNA (volcano) EUPHORBIA
ETNA (Pennsylvania, U.S.A.) EUPHORBIACEAE
ETON EUPHORBIUM
ETRETAT EUPHORBUS
ETRURIA EUPHORION
ETTENHEIM EUPHRANOR
ETTINGSHAUSEN, CONSTANTIN EUPHRATES
ETTLINGEN EUPHRONIUS
ETTMUeLLER, ERNST MORITZ LUDWIG EUPHROSYNE
ETTMUeLLER, MICHAEL EUPHUISM
ETTRICK EUPION
ETTY, WILLIAM EUPOLIS
ETYMOLOGY EUPOMPUS
EU EURASIAN
EUBOEA EURE
EUBULIDES EURE-ET-LOIR
EUBULUS (of Anaphlystus) EUREKA
EUBULUS (Athenian poet) EUREKA SPRINGS
EUCALYPTUS EURIPIDES
EUCHARIS EUROCLYDON
EUCHARIST EUROPA
EUCHRE EUROPE
EUCKEN, RUDOLF CHRISTOPH EUROPIUM
EUCLASE EURYDICE
EUCLID (of Megara) EURYMEDON
EUCLID (Greek mathematician) EUSDEN, LAURENCE
EUCRATIDES EUSEBIUS (many bishops)
EUDAEMONISM EUSEBIUS (bishop of Rome)
EUDOCIA AUGUSTA EUSEBIUS (of Caesarea)
EUDOCIA MACREMBOLITISSA EUSEBIUS (of Emesa)
EUDOXIA LOPUKHINA EUSEBIUS (of Myndus)
EUDOXUS (of Cnidus) EUSEBIUS (of Nicomedia)
EUDOXUS (of Cyzicus) EUSKIRCHEN
EUGENE OF SAVOY EUSTACE
EUGENE EUSTATHIUS (of Antioch)
EUGENICS EUSTATHIUS (Macrembolites)
EUGENIE EUSTATHIUS (of Thessalonica)
EUGENIUS EUSTYLE
EUGENOL EUTAWVILLE
EUHEMERUS EUTHYDEMUS
EULENSPIEGEL, TILL EUTIN
EULER, LEONHARD EUTROPIUS
EUMENES (rulers of Pergamum) EUTYCHES
EUMENES (Macedonian general) EUTYCHIANUS
EUMENIDES EUTYCHIDES
EUMENIUS EUYUK
EUMOLPUS EVAGORAS
EUNAPIUS EVAGRIUS
EUNOMIUS EVANDER
EUNUCH EVANGELICAL ALLIANCE
EUNUCH FLUTE EVANGELICAL ASSOCIATION

ETHIOPIA, or AETHIOPIA (Gr. [Greek: Aithiopia]), the ancient classical name of a district of north-eastern Africa, bounded on the N. by Egypt and on the E. by the Red Sea.[1] The application of the name has varied considerably at different times. In the Homeric poems the _Aethiopes_ are the furthest of mankind both eastward and westward; the gods go to their banquets and probably the Sun sets in their country. With the growth of scientific geography they came to be located somewhat less vaguely, and indeed their name was employed as the equivalent of the Assyrian and Hebrew Cush (q.v.), the Kesh or Ekosh of the Hieroglyphics (first found in Stele of Senwosri I.), i.e. a country extending from about the 24th to the 10th degree of N. lat., while its limits to the E. and W. were doubtful. The etymology of the name, which to a Greek ear meant "swarthy-faced," is unknown, nor can we say why in official inscriptions of the Axumite dynasty the word is used as the equivalent of Habashat (whence the modern Abyssinia), which, from the context would appear to denote a tribe located in S. Arabia, whose name was rendered by the Greek geographers as _Abaseni_ and _Abissa_.

The inhabitants of Ethiopia, partly perhaps owing to their honourable mention in the Homeric poems, attracted the attention of many Greek researchers, from Democritus onwards. Herodotus divides them into two main groups, a straight-haired race and a woolly-haired race, dwelling respectively to the East and West, and this distinction is confirmed by the Egyptian monuments. From his time onwards various names of tribes are enumerated, and to some extent geographically located, most of these appellations being Greek words, applied to the tribes by strangers in virtue of what seemed to be their leading characteristics, e.g. "Long-lived," "Fish-eaters," "Troglodytes," &c. The bulk of our information is derived from Egyptian monuments, whence it appears that, originally occupied by independent tribes, who were raided (first by Seneferu or Snefru, first king of the IVth or last of the IIIrd Dynasty) and gradually subjected by Egyptian kings (the steps in this process are traced by E.W. Budge, _The Egyptian Sudan_, 1907, i. 505 sqq.), under the XVIIIth Dynasty it became an Egyptian province, administered by a viceroy (at first the Egyptian king's son), called prince of Kesh, and paying tributes in negroes, oxen, gold, ivory, rare beads, hides and household utensils. The inhabitants frequently rebelled and were as often subdued; records of these repeated conquests were set up by the Egyptian kings in the shape of steles and temples; of the latter the temple of Amenhotep (Amenophis) III. at Soleb or Sulb seems to have been the most magnificent. Ethiopia became independent towards the 11th century B.C., when the XXIst Dynasty was reigning in Egypt. A state was founded, having for its capital Napata (mod. _Merawi_) at the foot of Jebel Barkal, "the sacred mountain," which in time became formidable, and in the middle of the 8th century conquered Egypt; an Egyptian campaign is recorded in the famous stele of King Pankhi. The fortunes of the Ethiopian (XXVth) Dynasty belong to the history of Egypt (q.v.). After the Ethiopian yoke had been shaken off by Egypt, about 660 B.C., Ethiopia continued independent, under kings of whom not a few are known from inscriptions. Besides a number whose names have been discovered in cartouches at Jebel Barkal, the following, of whom all but the third have left important steles, can be roughly dated: Tandamane, son of Tirhaka (667-650), Asperta (630-600), Pankharer (600-560), Harsiotf (560-525), Nastasen (525-500). From the evidence of the stele of the second (the Coronation Stele) and that of the fifth it has been inferred that the sovereignty early in this period became elective, a deputation of the various orders in the realm being (as Diodorus states), when a vacancy occurred, sent to Napata, where the chief god Amen selected out of the members of the royal family the person who was to succeed, and who became officially the god's son; and it seems certain that the priestly caste was more influential in Ethiopia than in Egypt both before and after this period. Another stele (called the Stele of Excommunication) records the expulsion of a priestly family guilty of murder (H. Schaefer, _Klio_, vi. 287): the name of the sovereign who expelled them has been obliterated. The stele of Harsiotf contains the record of nine expeditions, in the course of which the king subdued various tribes south of Meroe and built a number of temples. The stele of the last of these sovereigns, now in the Berlin Museum, and edited by H. Schaefer (Leipzig, 1901), contains valuable information concerning the state of the Ethiopian kingdom in its author's time. Shortly after his accession he was threatened with invasion by Cambyses, the Persian conqueror of Egypt, but (according to his own account) destroyed the fleet sent by the invader up the Nile, while (as we learn from Herodotus) the land-force succumbed to famine (see CAMBYSES). It further appears that in his time and that of his immediate predecessors the capital of the kingdom had been removed from Napata, where in the time of Harsiotf the temples and palaces were already in ruins, to Merce at a distance of 60 camel-hours to the south-east. But Napata retained its importance as the religious metropolis; it was thither that the king went to be crowned, and there too the chief god delivered his oracles, which were (it is said) implicitly obeyed. The local names in Nastasen's inscription, describing his royal circuit, are in many cases obscure. A city named Pnups (Hierogl. Pa-Nebes) appears to have constituted the most northerly point in the empire. These Ethiopian kings seem to have made no attempt to reconquer Egypt, though they were often engaged in wars with the wild tribes of the Sudan. For the 5th and 4th centuries B.C. the history of the country is a blank. A fresh epoch was, however, inaugurated by Ergamenes, a contemporary of Ptolemy Philadelphus, who is said to have massacred the priests at Napata, and destroyed sacerdotal influence, till then so great that the king might at the priests' order be compelled to destroy himself; Diodorus attributes this measure to Ergamenes' acquaintance with Greek culture, which he introduced into his country. A temple was built by this king at Pselcis (Dakka) to Thoth. Probably the sovereignty again became hereditary. Occasional notices of Ethiopia occur from this time onwards in Greek and Latin authors, though the special treatises by Agatharchides and others are lost. According to these the country came to be ruled by queens named Candace. One of them was involved in war with the Romans in 24 and 23 B.C.; the land was invaded by C. Petronius, who took the fortress Premis or Ibrim, and sacked the capital (then Napata); the emperor Augustus, however, ordered the evacuation of the country without even demanding tribute. The stretch of land between Assuan (Syene) and Maharraka (Hiera Sycaminus) was, however, regarded as belonging to the Roman empire, and Roman cohorts were stationed at the latter place. To judge by the monuments it is possible that there were queens who reigned alone. Pyramids were erected for queens as well as for kings, and the position of the queens was little inferior to that of their consorts, though, so far as monumental representations go, they always yielded precedence to the latter. Candace appears to be found as the name of a queen for whom a pyramid was built at Meroe. A great builder was Netekamane, who is represented with his queen Amanetari on temples of Egyptian style at many points up the Nile--at Amara just above the second cataract, and at Napata, as well as at Meroe, Benaga and Naga in the distant Isle of Meroe. He belongs, probably, to the Ptolemaic age. Later, in the Roman period, the type in sculpture changed from the Egyptian. The figures are obese, especially the women, and have pronounced negro features, and the royal person is loaded with bulging gold ornaments. Of this period also there is a royal pair, Netekamane and Amanetari, imitating the names of their conspicuous predecessors. In the 4th century A.D. the state of Meroe was ravaged by the Nubas(?) and the Abyssinians, and in the 6th century its place was taken by the Christian state of Nubia (see DONGOLA).

Contrary to the opinion of the Greeks, the Ethiopians appear to have derived their religion and civilization from the Egyptians. The royal inscriptions are written in the hieroglyphic character and the Egyptian language, which, however, in the opinion of experts, steadily deteriorate after the separation of Ethiopia from Egypt. About the time of Ergamenes, or (according to some authorities) before, a vernacular came to be employed in inscriptions, written in a special alphabet of 23 signs in parallel hieroglyphic and cursive forms. The cursive is to be read from right to left, the hieroglyphic, contrary to the Egyptian method, in the direction in which the figures face. The Egyptian equivalents of six characters have been made out by the aid of bilingual cartouches. Words are divided from each other by pairs of dots, and it is clear that the forms and values of the signs are largely based on Egyptian writing; but as yet decipherment has not been attained, nor can it yet be stated to what group the language should be assigned (F. Ll. Griffith in D.R. MacIver's _Areika_, Oxford, 1909, and later researches).

Notices in Greek authors are collected by P. Paulitschke, _Die
geographische Erforschung des afrikanischen Continents_ (Vienna,
1880); the inscriptions were edited and interpreted by G. Maspero,
_Revue archeol_. xxii., xxv.; _Melanges d'Assyriologie et
d'Egyptologie_, ii., iii.; _Records of the Past_, vi.; T.S.B.A. iv.;
Schaefer, l.c., and _Zeitschrift fuer aegyptische Sprache_, xxxiii. See
also J.H. Breasted, "The Monuments of Sudanese Nubia," in _American
Journal of Semitic Languages_ (October 1908), and the work of E.W.
Budge cited above. A description of the chief ruins and the results of
Dr D.R. MacIver's researches in northern Nubia, begun in 1907, will be
found under SUDAN: _Anglo-Egyptian_.

_The Axumite Kingdom_.--About the 1st century of the Christian era a new kingdom grew up at Axum (q.v.), of which a king Zoscales is mentioned in the _Periplus Maris Erythraei_. Fragments of the history of this kingdom, of which there is no authentic chronicle, have been made out chiefly by the aid of inscriptions, of which the following is a list:--(1) Greek inscription of Adulis, copied by Cosmas Indicopleustes in 545, the beginning, with the king's name, lost. (2) Sabaean inscription of Ela Amida in two halves, discovered by J. Theodore Bent at Axum in 1893, and completed by E. Littmann in 1906. (3) Ethiopic inscription probably of the same king, imperfect (Littmann). (4) Trilingual inscription of Aeizanes, the Greek version discovered by Henry Salt in 1805, the Sabaean by Bent, and the Ethiopic (Geez) by Littmann. (5) Ethiopic inscription of Aeizanes (so Littmann), son of Ela Amida, discovered by Eduard Rueppell in 1833. (6) Ethiopic inscriptions of Hetana-Dan'el, son of Dabra Efrem. These are all long inscriptions giving details of wars, &c. The sixth is later than the rest, which are to be attributed to the most flourishing period of the kingdom, the 4th and 5th centuries A.D. The fourth is pagan, the fifth Christian, Aeizanes having in the interval embraced Christianity. It was to this king that the emperor Constantius addressed a letter in 356 A.D.

Aeizanes and his successors style themselves kings of the Axumites, Homerites (Himyar), Raidan, the Ethiopians (Habasat), the Sabaeans, Silee, Tiamo, the Bugaites (Bega) and Kasu. This style implies considerable conquests in South Arabia, which, however, must have been lost to the Axumites by A.D. 378. They claim to rule the Kasu or Meroitic Ethiopians; and the fifth inscription records an expedition along the Atbara and the Nile to punish the Nuba and Kasu, and a fragment of a Greek inscription from Meroe was recognized by Sayce as commemorating a king of Axum. Except for these inscriptions Axumite history is a blank until in the 6th century we find the Axumite king sending an expedition to wreck the Jewish state then existing in S. Arabia, and reducing that country to a state of vassalage: the king is styled in Ethiopian chronicles Caleb (Kaleb), in Greek and Arabic documents El-Esbaha. In the 7th century a successor to this king, named Abraha or Abraham, gave refuge to the persecuted followers of Mahomet at the beginning of his career (see ARABIA: _History, ad init_.). A few more names of kings occur on coins, which were struck in Greek characters till about A.D. 700, after which time that language seems definitely to have been displaced in favour of Ethiopic or Geez: the condition of the script and the coins renders them all difficult to identify with the names preserved in the native lists, which are too fanciful and mutually contradictory to furnish of themselves even a vestige of history. For the period between the rise of Islam and the beginning of the modern history of Abyssinia there are a few notices in Arabic writers; so we have a notice of a war between Ethiopia and Nubia about 687 (C.C. Rossini in _Giorn. Soc. Asiat. Ital_. x. 141), and of a letter to George king of Nubia from the king of Abyssinia some time between 978 and 1003, when a Jewish queen Judith was oppressing the Christian population (I. Guidi, _ibid_. iii. 176, 7).

The Abyssinian chronicles, it may be noted, attribute the foundation of the kingdom to Menelek (or Ibn el-Hakim), son of Solomon and the queen of Sheba. The Axumite or Menelek dynasty was driven from northern Abyssinia by Judith, but soon after another Christian dynasty, that of the Zagues, obtained power. In 1268 the reigning prince abdicated in favour of Yekuno Amlak. king of Shoa, a descendant of the monarch overthrown by Judith (see ABYSSINIA).

See A. Dillman, _Die Anfaenge des axumitischen Reiches_ (Berlin, 1879);
E. Drouin, _Revue archeol_. xliv. (1882); T. Mommsen, _Geschichte der
roemischen Provinzen_, chap. xiii.; W. Dittenberger, _Orientis Graeci
Inscriptiones selectae_, Nos. 199, 200; Littmann u. Kroncker,
_Vorbericht der deutschen Aksum-Expedition_ (Berlin, 1906), and
Littman's subsequent researches.

ETHIOPIC LITERATURE

The employment of the Geez or Ethiopic language for literary purposes appears to have begun no long time before the introduction of Christianity into Abyssinia, and its pagan period is represented by two Axumite inscriptions (published by D.H. Mueller in J.T. Bent's _Sacred City of the Ethiopians_, 1893), and an inscription at Matara (published by C.C. Rossini, _Rendiconti Accad. Lincei_, 1896). As a literary language it survived its use as a vernacular, but it is unknown at what time it ceased to be the latter. In Sir W. Cornwallis Harris's _Highlands of Aethiopia_ (1844) there is a list of rather more than 100 works extant in Ethiopic; subsequent research has chiefly brought to light fresh copies of the same works, but it has contributed some fresh titles. A conspectus of all the MSS. known to exist in Europe (over 1200 in number) was published by C.C. Rossini in 1899 (_Rendiconti Accad. Lincei_, ser. v. vol. viii.); of these the largest collection is that in the British Museum, but others of various sizes are to be found in the chief libraries of Europe. R.E. Littmann (in the _Zeitschrift fuer Assyriologie_, xv. and xvi.) describes two collections at Jerusalem, one of which contains 283 MSS.; and Rossini (Rendiconti, 1904) a collection of 35 MSS. belonging to the Catholic mission at Cheren. Other collections exist in Abyssinia, and many MSS. are in private hands. In 1893 besides portions of the Bible some 40 Ethiopic books had been printed in Europe (enumerated in L. Goldschmidt's _Bibliotheca Aethiopica_), but many more have since been published.

Geez literature is ordinarily divided into two periods, of which the first dates from the establishment of Christianity in the 5th century, and ends somewhere in the 7th; the second from the re-establishment of the Salomonic dynasty in 1268, continuing to the present time. It consists chiefly of translations, made in the first period from Greek, in the second from Arabic. It has no authors of the first or even of the second rank. Its character as a sacred and literary language is due to its translation of the Bible, which in the ordinary enumeration is made to contain 81 books, 46 of the Old Testament, and 35 of the New. These figures are most probably obtained by adding to the ordinary canonical books _Maccabees, Tobit, Judith, Wisdom, Ecclesiasticus, Baruch, Jubilees, Enoch_, the _Ascension of Isaiah, Ezra IV., Shepherd of Hermas, the Synodos_ (Canons of the Apostles), the _Book of Adam_, and _Joseph Ben Gorion_. For the distinction between canonical and apocryphal appears to be unknown to the Ethiopic Church, whose chief service to Biblical literature consists in its preservation of various apocryphal works which other parts of Christendom have lost or possess only in an imperfect form (see ENOCH; JUBILEES, BOOK OF, &c.). It should be observed that the _Maccabees_ of the Ethiopic Bible is an entirely different work from the books of that name included in the Septuagint, of which, however, the Abyssinians have a recent version made from the Vulgate; specimens of their own _Maccabees_ have been published by J. Horovitz in the _Zeitschrift fuer Assyriologie_, vol. xx. The MSS. of the Biblical books vary very much, and none of them can claim any great antiquity; the oldest extant MS. of the four Books of Kings appears to be one in the Museo Borgiano, presented by King Amda Sion (1314) to the Virgin Mary in Jerusalem (described by N. Roupp, _ibid._ xvi. 296-342). Hence P. de Lagarde supposed the Ethiopic version to have been made from the Arabic, which indeed is in accordance with a native tradition. This opinion is held by few; C.F.A. Dillman distinguished in the case of the Old Testament three classes of MSS., a _versio antiqua_, made from the Septuagint (probably in the Hesychian text), a class revised from Greek MSS., and a class revised from the Hebrew (probably through the medium of an Arabic version). An examination of ten chapters of St Matthew by L. Hackspill (ibid. vol. xi.) led to the result that the Ethiopic version of the Gospels was made about A.D. 500, from a Syro-occidental text, and that this original translation is represented by Cod. Paris. Aeth. 32; whereas most MSS. and all printed editions contain a text influenced by the Alexandrian Vulgate, and show traces of Arabic. Rossini (_ibid._ x. 232) has made it probable that the Abba Salama, whom the native tradition identifies with Frumentius, evangelist of Abyssinia, to whom the translation of the Bible was ascribed, was in reality a Metropolitan of the early 14th century, who revised the corrupt text then current. Of the ancient translation the latest book is said to be Ecclesiasticus, translated in the year 678. The New Testament has been published repeatedly (first in Rome, 1548-1549; some letters about its publication were edited by I. Guidi in the _Archivio della Soc. Rom. di Storia Patria_, 1886), and C.F.A. Dillmann edited a critical text of most of the Old Testament and Apocrypha, but did not live to complete it; portions have been edited by J. Bachmann and others.

Other translations thought to belong to the first period are the _Sher'ata Makhbar_, ascribed to S. Pachomius; the _Kerilos_, a collection of homilies and tracts, beginning with Cyril of Alexandria _De recta fide_; and the _Physiologus_, a fanciful work on Natural History (edited by F. Hommel, Leipzig, 1877).

Of the works belonging to the second period much the most important are those which deal with Abyssinian history. A court official, called _sahafe te'ezazenet_ (secretary), having under him a staff of scribes, was employed to draw up the public annals year by year; and on these official compositions the Abyssinian histories are based. The earliest part of the Axum chronicle preserved is that recording the wars of Amda Sion (1314-1344) against the Moslems; it is doubtful, however, whether even this exists in its original form, as some scholars think; according to its editor (J. Perruchon in the _Journ. Asiat._ for 1889) it is preserved in a recension of the time of King Zar'a Ya'kub. Under King Lebna Dengel (1508-1540) the annals of his four predecessors, Zar'a Ya'kub, Baeda Maryam, Eskender and Na'od (1434-1508) were drawn up; those of the first two were published by J. Perruchon (Paris, 1893); in the _Journ. Asiat._ for 1894 the same scholar published a further fragment of the history of Baeda Maryam, written by the tutor to the king's children, and the history of Eskender, Amda Sion II. and Na'od as compiled in Lebna Dengel's time. The history of Lebna Dengel was published by the same scholar (_Journ. Semit._ i. 274) and Rossini (_Rendiconti_, 1894, v. p. 617); that of his successor Claudius (1540-1559) by Conzelmann (Paris, 1895); that of his successor Minas (1559-1563) by F.M.E. Pereira (Lisbon, 1888); those of the three following kings, Sharsa Dengel, Za Dengel, and Ya'kub, by Rossini (_Rendiconti_, 1893). The history of the next king Sysenius (1606-1632) by Abba Meherka Dengel and Tekla Shelase was edited by Pereira (Lisbon, 1892); the chronicles of Joannes I., Iyasu I. and Bakaffa (1682-1730) by I. Guidi, with a French translation (Paris, 1903-1905); all are contemporary, and the names of the chroniclers of the last two kings are recorded. Besides these we have the partly fabulous chronicle of Lalibela (of uncertain date, but before the Salomonian dynasty was restored), edited by Perruchon (Paris, 1892); and a brief chronicle of Abyssinia, drawn up in the reign of Iyasu II. (1729-1753), embodying materials abridged, but often unaltered, was published by R. Basset, in the _Journ. Asiat._ for 1882 (cf. Rossini in the _Rendiconti_, 1893-1894, p. 668), and has since formed the basis for Abyssinian history. Many compilations of the sort exist in MS. in libraries, and great praise is bestowed on the one which E. Rueppell, when travelling in Abyssinia, ordered to be drawn up for his use. It is now in the collection of his MSS. at Frankfurt. Ethiopic scholars speak of a special "historical style" which comes from the mixture of the styles of different periods, and the admixture of Amharic phrases and idioms. The historian of the wars of Amda Sion is credited with some literary merit; most of the chroniclers have little.

The remaining literature of the second period is thought to begin somewhat earlier than these chronicles. To the time of King Yekuno Amlak (1268-1283) the historical romance called _Kebra Nagaset_ (Glory of Kings) is assigned by its editor, C. Bezold (Bavarian Academy, 1904); other scholars gave it a somewhat later date. Its purpose is to glorify the Salomonian dynasty, whence, in spite of a colophon which declares it to be a translation, it was regarded as an original work; since, however, it shows evident signs of having been translated from Arabic, Bezold supposes that its author, Ishak, was an immigrant whose native language was Arabic, in which therefore he would naturally write the first draft of his book. To the time of Yagbea Sion (ob. 1294) belongs the _Vision of the Prophet Habakkuk in Kartasa_, as also the works of Abba Salama, regarded as the founder of the Ethiopic renaissance, one of whose sermons is preserved in a Cheren MS. With his name are connected the _Acts of the Passion_, the _Service for the Dead_ and the translation of Philexius, i.e. Philoxenus. King Zar'a Ya'kub composed or had composed for him as many as seven books; the most important of these is the _Book of Light_ (Mashafa Berhan), paraphrased as _Kirchenordnung_, by Dillmann, who gave an analysis of its contents (_Ueber die Regierung des Koenigs Zar'a Ya'kob_, Berl. Acad., 1884). He also organized the compilation of the Miracles of the Virgin Mary, one of the most popular of Ethiopic books; a magnificent edition was printed by E.W. Budge in the Meux collection (London, 1900). In the same reign the Arabic chronicle of al-Makin was translated into Geez. Under Lebna Dengel (ob. 1540), besides the above-mentioned collection of chronicles, we hear of the translation from the Arabic of the history and martyrdom of St George, the Commentary of J. Chrysostom on the Epistle to the Hebrews, and the ascetic works of J. Saba called _Aragawi manfasawi._ Under Claudius (1540-1559) Maba Sion is said to have translated from the Arabic _The Faith of the Fathers_, a vast compilation, including the _Didascalia Apostalorum_ (edited by Platt, London, 1834), and the _Creed of Jacob Baradaeus_ (published by Cornill, _ZDMG_. xxx. 417-466), and to the same reign belong the _Book of Extreme Unction (Mashafa Kandil_), and the religious romance _Barlaam et Joasaph_ also paraphrased from the Arabic (partly edited by A. Zotenberg in _Notices et Extraits_, vol. xxviii.). _The Confession of Faith_ of King Claudius has been repeatedly printed. The reign of Sharsa Dengel (ob. 1595) was marked by many literary monuments, such as the religious and controversial compilation called _Mazmura Chrestos_, and the translation, by a certain Salik, of the religious encyclopaedia (Mashafa Haia) of the monk Nikon; an Arab merchant from Yemen, who took on conversion the name Anbakom (Habakkuk), translated a number of books from the Arabic. Under Ya'kub (ob. 1605) the valuable chronicle of John of Nikiou was translated from Arabic (edited by A. Zotenberg with French translation in _Notices et extraits_, vol. xxiv.). Under John, about 1687, the _Spiritual Medicine_ of Michael, bishop of Adtrib and Malig, was translated. The literature that is not accurately dated consists largely of liturgies, prayers and hymns; Ethiopic poetry is chiefly, if not entirely, represented by the last of these, the most popular work of the kind being an ode in praise of the Virgin, called _Weddase Maryam_ (edited by K. Fries, Leipzig, 1892). Various hymn-books bear the names _Degua, Zemmare_ and _Mawas'et_ (Antiphones); there is also a biblical history in verse called _Mashafa Madbal_ or _Mestira Zaman_. Homilies also exist in large numbers, both original and translated, sometimes after the Arabic fashion in rhymed prose. Hagiology is naturally an important department in Ethiopic literature. In the great collection called _Synaxar_ (translated originally from Arabic, but with large additions) for each day of the year there is the history of one or more saints; an attempt has been made by H. Duensing (1900) to derive some actual history from it. Many texts containing lives of individual saints have been issued. Such are those of Maba Sion and Gabra Chrestos, edited by Budge in the Meux collection (London, 1899); the Acts of S. Mercurius, of which a fragment was edited by Rossini (Rome, 1904); the unique MS. of the original, one of the most extensive works in the Geez language, was burned by thieves who set fire to the editor's house. The same scholar began a series of _Vitae Sanctorum antiquiorum_, while _Monumenta Aethiopiae hagiologica_ and _Vitae Sanctorum indigenarum_ have been edited by B. Turaiev (Leipzig and St Petersburg, 1902, and Rome, 1905). Other lives have been edited by Pereira, Guidi, &c. Similar in historical value to these works is the _History of the Exploits of Alexander_, of which various recensions have been edited by Budge (London, 1895). See further ALEXANDER THE GREAT, section on the legends, ad fin.

Of Law the most important monument is the _Fatha Nagaset_ (Judgment of Kings), of which an official edition was issued by I. Guidi (Rome, 1899), with an Italian translation; it is a version probably made in the early 16th century of the Arabic code of Ibn 'Assal, of the 12th century, whose work, being meant for Christians living under Moslem rule, was not altogether suitable for an independent Christian kingdom; yet the need for such a code made it popular and authoritative in Abyssinia. The translator was not quite equal to his task, and the Brit. Mus. MS. 800 exhibits an attempt to correct it from the original.

Science can scarcely be said to exist in Geez literature, unless a medical treatise, of which the British Museum possesses a copy, comes under this head. Philosophy is mainly represented by mystical commentaries on Scripture, such as the _Book of the Mystery of Heaven and Earth_, by Ba-Hailu Michael, probably of the 15th century, edited by Perruchon and Guidi (Paris, 1903). There is, however, a translation of the Book of the Wise Philosophers, made by Michael, son of Abba Michael, consisting of various aphorisms; specimens have been edited by Dillmann in his Chrestomathy, and J. Cornill (Leipzig, 1876). There is also a translation of _Secundus the Silent_, edited by Bachmann (Berlin, 1888). Far more interesting than these is the treatise of Zar'a Ya'kub of Axum, composed in the year 1660 (edited by Littman, 1904), which contains an endeavour to evolve rules of life according to nature. The author reviews the codes of Moses, the Gospel and the Koran, and decides that all contravene the obvious intentions of the Creator. He also gives some details of his own life and his occupation of scribe. A less original treatise by Walda Haywat accompanies it. Epistolography is represented by the diplomatic correspondence of some of the kings with the Portuguese and Spanish courts; some documents of this sort have been edited by C. Beccari, _Documenti inediti per la storia d' Etiopia_ (Rome, 1903); lexicography, by the vocabulary called _Sawasew_. The first Ethiopic book printed was the Psalter (Rome, 1513), by John Potken of Cologne, the first European who studied the language.

See C.C. Rossini, "Note per la storia letteraria Abissina," in
_Rendiconti della R. Accad. dei Lincei_ (1899); Fumagalli,
_Bibliografia Etiopica_ (1893); Basset, _Etudes sur l'histoire de
l'Ethiopie_ (1882); Catalogues of various libraries, especially
British Museum (Wright), Paris (Zotenberg), Oxford and Berlin
(Dillmann), Frankfurt (Goldschmidt). Plates illustrating Ethiopic
palaeography are to be found in Wright's Catalogue; an account of the
illustrations in Ethiopic MSS. is given by Budge in his _Life of Maba
Sion_; and a collection of inscriptions in the church of St Stefano
dei Mori, in Rome, by Gallina in the _Archivio della Soc. Rom. di
Storia Patria_ (1888). (D. S. M.*)

FOOTNOTE:

[1] For the topography and later history see SUDAN and ABYSSINIA.

ETHNOLOGY and ETHNOGRAPHY (from the Gr. [Greek: ethnos], race, and [Greek: logos], science, or [Greek: graphein], to write), sciences which in their narrowest sense deal respectively with man as a racial unit (_mankind_), i.e. his development through the family and tribal stages into national life, and with the distribution over the earth of the races and nations thus formed. Though the etymology of the words permits in theory of this line of division between ethnology and ethnography, in practice they form an indivisible study of man's progress from the point at which anthropology (q.v.) leaves him.

Ethnology is thus the general name for investigations of the widest character, including subjects which in this encyclopaedia are dealt with in detail under separate headings, such as ARCHAEOLOGY, ART (and allied articles), COMMERCE, GEOGRAPHY (and the headings for countries and tribes), FAMILY, NAME, ETHICS, LAW, MYTHOLOGY, FOLK-LORE (and allied articles), PHILOLOGY (and allied articles), AGRICULTURE, ARCHITECTURE, RELIGION, SOCIOLOGY, &c., &c. It covers generally the whole history of the material and intellectual development of man, as it has passed through the stages of (a) hunting and fishing, (b) sheep and cattle tending, (c) agriculture, (d) industry. It investigates his food, his weapons, tools and implements, his housing, his social, economic and commercial organization, forms of government, language, art, literature, morals, superstitions and religious systems. In this sense ethnology is the older term for what now is called sociology. At the present day the progress of research has in practice, however, restricted the "ethnologist" as a rule to the study of one or more branches only of so wide a subject, and the word "ethnology" is used with a somewhat vague meaning for any ethnological study; each country or nation has thus its own separate ethnology. It becomes more convenient, therefore, to deal with the ethnology as a special subject in each case. "Ethnography," in so far as it has a distinctive province, is then conveniently restricted to the scientific mapping out of different racial regions, nations and tribes; and it is only necessary here to refer the reader to the separate articles on continents, &c., where this is done. The only fundamental problem which need here be referred to is that of the whole question of the division of mankind into separate races at all, which is consequential on the earlier problem (dealt with in the article ANTHROPOLOGY) as to man's origin and antiquity.

If we assume that man existed on the earth in remote geological time, the question arises, was this pleistocene man specifically one? What evidence is there that he represented in his different habitats a series of varieties of one species rather than a series of species? The evidence is of three kinds, (1) anatomical, (2) physiological, (3) cultural and psychical.

1. Dr Robert Munro, in his address to the Anthropological section of the British Association in 1893, said: "All the osseous remains of man which have hitherto been collected and examined point to the fact that, during the larger portion of the quarternary period, if not, indeed, from its very commencement, he had already acquired his human characteristics." By "characteristics" is here meant those anatomical ones which distinguish man from other animals, not the physical criteria of the various races. Do, then, these anatomical characteristics of pleistocene man show such differences among themselves and between them and the types of man existing to-day as to justify the assumption that there has ever been more than one species of man?

The undoubted "osseous remains" of pleistocene man are few. Burial was not practised, and the few bones found are for the most part those which have by mere chance been preserved in caves or rock-shelters. Of these the three chief "finds," in order of probable age, are the Trinil (Java) brain-cap, the lowest human skull yet described, characterized by depressed cranial arch, with a cephalic index of 70; the Neanderthal (Germany) skull, remarkable for its flat retreating curve with an index of 73-76; and the two nearly perfect skeletons found at Spy (Belgium), the skulls of which exhibit enormous brow ridges with cranial indices of 70 and 75. All these skulls, taken in conjunction with other well-authenticated human remains such as those found at La Naulette (Belgium), Shipka (Balkan Peninsula), Olmo (Italy), Predmert (Bohemia) and in Argentina and Brazil, make it possible to reconstruct anatomically the varying types of pleistocene man, and to establish the fact that in essential features the same primitive type has persisted through all time. The skeleton bones show differences so slight as to admit of pathological or other explanation. What Professor Kollmann says of man to-day was true in the remotest ages. Referring to Cuvier's statement that from a single bone it is possible to determine the very species to which an animal belongs, he says, "Precisely on this ground I have mainly concluded that the existence of several human species cannot be recognized, for we are unacquainted with a single tribe from a single bone of which we might with certainty determine to what species it belonged." Such differences as the bones exhibit are progressive modifications towards the higher neolithic and modern types, and are in themselves entirely incapable of supporting the theory that the owner of the Trinil skull, say, and the "man of Spy" belonged to separate species. All these "osseous remains" belong to the palaeolithic period, and from the cranial indices it is thus clear that palaeolithic man was long-headed. Neolithic man is, speaking generally, round-headed, and it has been urged that round-headedness is entirely synchronous with the neolithic age, and that the long-headed palaeolithic species of mankind gave place all at once to the round-headed neolithic species. The point thus raised involves the physiological as well as, indeed more than, the anatomical proofs of man's specific unity.

2. All physiologists agree that species cannot breed with species. Darwin himself laid it down as a fundamental principle. If then the palaeolithic and neolithic types represented separate species, they would be found to remain distinct through all time. This is not the case. There is evidence that extreme dolichocephaly continued into neolithic times, and was only slowly modified into brachycephaly. In the neolithic caves of Italy, Austria, Belgium, and the barrows of Great Britain, skulls of all types are found. The later cave-dwellers and early dolmen builders of Europe were at first long-headed, then of medium type, and finally in some places exclusively round-headed. In England the round-heads appear to be synchronous with the metal age, as shown by the contents of the barrows, and, as on the continental mainland, the two types gradually blended. Permanent fertility between them in prehistoric Europe is thus proved. And this is the case throughout the habitable globe. An examination of the osseous remains of American man supports the view that the human species has not varied since quaternary times. The palaeolithic type is to be found among modern European populations. Certain skulls from South Australia seem cast in almost the same mould as the Neanderthal. After thousands of years nearly pure descendants of quaternary man are found among living races. And man's mutual fertility in prehistoric is repeated throughout historic times: strict racial purity is almost unknown. Thus the unity of the species man is proved by the test of fertility.

3. The works of early man everywhere present the most startling resemblance. The palaeolithic implements all over the globe are all of one pattern. "The implements in distant lands," writes Sir J. Evans, "are so identical in form and character with the British specimens that they might have been manufactured by the same hands.... On the banks of the Nile, many hundreds of feet above its present level, implements of the European types have been discovered; while in Somaliland, in an ancient river-valley at a great elevation above the sea, Sir H.W. Seton-Karr has collected a large number of implements formed of flint and quartzite, which, judging from their form and character, might have been dug out of the drift-deposits of the Somme and the Seine, the Thames or the ancient Solent." This identity in the earliest arts is repeated in the later stages of man's culture; his arts and crafts, his manners and customs, exhibit a similarity so close as to compel the presumption that all the races are but divisions of one family. But perhaps the greatest psychical proof of man's specific unity is his common possession of language. Theodore Waitz writes: "Inasmuch as the possession of a language of regular grammatical structure forms a fixed barrier between man and brute, it establishes at the same time a near relationship between all people in psychical respects.... In the presence of this common feature of the human mind, all other differences lose their import" (_Anthropology_, p. 273). As Dr J.C. Prichard urged, "the same inward and mental nature is to be recognized in all races of men. When we compare this fact with the observations, fully established, as to the specific instincts and separate psychical endowments of all the distinct tribes of sentient beings in the Universe we are entitled to draw confidently the conclusion that all human races are of one species and one family." It has been argued that stock languages imply stock races, but this assumption is untenable. There are some fifty irreducible stock languages in the United States and Canada, yet, taking into consideration the physical and moral homogeneity of the American Indian races, he would be a reckless theorist who held that there were therefore fifty separate human species. If it were so, how have they descended? There are no anthropoid apes in America, none of the ape family higher than the Cebidae, from which it is impossible to trace men. Again, in Australia there is certainly one stock language, yet there are not even Cebidae. In Caucasia, there are many distinct forms of speech, yet all the peoples belong to the Caucasic division of mankind.

Man, then, may be regarded as specifically one, and thus he must have had an original cradle-land, whence the peopling of the earth was brought about by migration. The evidence tends to prove that the world was peopled by a generalized proto-human form. Each division of mankind would thus have had its pleistocene ancestors, and would have become differentiated into races by the influence of climatic and other surroundings. As to the man's cradle-land there have been many theories, but the weight of evidence is in favour of Indo-Malaysia.

Of all animals man's range alone coincides with that of the habitable globe, and the real difficulty of the "cradle-land" theory lay in explaining how the human race spread to every land. This problem has been met by geology, which proves that the earth's surface has undergone great changes since man's appearance, and that continents, long since submerged, once existed, making a complete land communication from Indo-Malaysia. The evidence for the Indo-African continent has been summed up by R.D. Oldham,[1] and proofs no less cogent are available of the former existence of an Eurafrican continent, while the extension of Australia in the direction of New Guinea is more than probable. Thus the ancestor of man was free to move in all directions over the eastern hemisphere. The western hemisphere was more than probably connected with Europe and Asia, in Tertiary times, by a continent, the existence of which is evidenced by a submarine bank stretching from Scotland through the Faeroes and Iceland to Greenland, and on the other side by continuous land at what is now the Behring Straits.

Acclimatization has been urged as an argument against the cradle-land theory, but the peopling of the globe took place in inter-Glacial if not pre-Glacial ages, when the climate was much milder everywhere, and thus pleistocene man met no climatic difficulties in his migrations.

Probably before the close of Palaeolithic times all the primary divisions of man were specialized in their several habitats by the influence of their surroundings. The profound effect of climate is seen in the relative culture of races. Thus, tropical countries are inhabited by savage or semi-savage peoples, while the higher races are confined to temperate zones. The primary divisions of mankind, Ethiopic, Mongolic, Caucasic, were certainly differentiated in neolithic times, and these criteria had almost certainly occurred not consecutively in one area but simultaneously in several areas. A Negro was not metamorphosed into a Mongol, nor the latter into a White, but the several semi-simian precursors under varying environments developed into generalized Negro, generalized Mongol, generalized Caucasian.

Taking, then, these three primary divisions as those into which it is most reasonable broadly to divide mankind they may be analysed as to their racial constituents and their habitats as follows:--

1. Caucasic or White Man is best divided, following Huxley, into (a) Xanthochroi or "fair whites" and (b) Melanochroi or "dark whites." (a) The first--tall, with almost colourless skin, blue or grey eyes, hair from straw colour to chestnut, and skulls varying as to proportionate width--are the prevalent inhabitants of Northern Europe, and the type may be traced into North Africa and eastward as far as India. On the south and west it mixes with that of the Melanochroi and on the north and east with that of the Mongoloids. (b) The "dark whites" differ from the fair whites in the darkening of the complexion to brownish and olive, and of the eyes and hair to black, while the stature is somewhat lower and the frame lighter. To this division belong a large part of those classed as Celts, and of the populations of Southern Europe, such as Spaniards, Greeks and Arabs, extending as far as India, while endless intermediate grades between the two white types testify to ages of intermingling. Besides these two main types, the Caucasic division of mankind has been held with much reason to include such aberrant types as the brown Polynesian races of the Eastern Pacific, Samoans, Hawaiians, Maoris, &c., the proto-Malay peoples of the Eastern archipelago, sometimes termed Indonesians, represented by the Dyaks of Borneo and the Battaks of Sumatra, the Todas of India and the Ainus of Japan.

2. Mongolic or Yellow Man prevails over the vast area lying east of a line drawn from Lapland to Siam. His physical characteristics are a short squat body, a yellowish-brown or coppery complexion, hair lank, straight and black, flat small nose, broad skull, usually without prominent brow-ridges, and black oblique eyes. Of the typical Mongolic races the chief are the Chinese, Tibetans, Burmese, Siamese; the Finnic group of races occupying Northern Europe, such as Finns, Lapps, Samoyedes and Ostyaks, and the Arctic Asiatic group represented by the Chukchis and Kamchadales; the Tunguses, Gilyaks and Golds north of, and the Mongols proper west of, Manchuria; the pure Turkic peoples and the Japanese and Koreans. Less typical, but with the Mongolic elements so predominant as to warrant inclusion, are the Malay peoples of the Eastern archipelago. Lastly, though differentiated in many ways from the true Mongol, the American races from the Eskimo to the Fuegians must be reckoned in the Yellow division of mankind.

3. Negroid or Black Man is primarily represented by the Negro of Africa between the Sahara and the Cape district, including Madagascar. The skin varies from dark brown to brown-black, with eyes of the same colour, and hair usually black and always crisp or woolly. The skull is narrow, with orbital ridges not prominent, the jaws protrude, the nose is flat and broad, and the lips thick and everted. Two important families are classed in this division; some authorities hold, as special modifications of the typical Negro to-day, others as actually nearer the true generalized Negroid type of neolithic times. First are the Bushman of South Africa, diminutive in stature and of a yellowish-brown colour: the neighbouring Hottentot is believed to be the result of crossing between the Bushman and the true Negro. Second are the large Negrito family, represented in Africa by the dwarf races of the equatorial forests, the Akkas, Batwas, Wochuas and others, and beyond Africa by the Andaman Islanders, the Aetas of the Philippines, and probably the Senangs and other aboriginal tribes of the Malay Peninsula. The Negroid type seems to have been the earliest predominant in the South Sea islands, but it is impossible to say certainly whether it is itself derived from the Negrito, or the latter is a modification of it, as has been suggested above. In Melanesia, the Papuans of New Guinea, of New Caledonia, and other islands, represent a more or less Negroid type, as did the now extinct Tasmanians.

Excluded from this survey of the grouping of Man are the aborigines of Australia, whose ethnical affinities are much disputed. Probably they are to be reckoned as Dravidians, a very remote blend of Caucasic and Negro man. For a detailed discussion of the branches of these three main divisions of Man the reader must refer to articles under race headings, and to NEGRO; NEGRITOS; MONGOLS; MALAYS; INDIANS, NORTH AMERICAN; AUSTRALIA; AFRICA; &c., &c.

BIBLIOGRAPHY.--J.C. Prichard, _Natural History of Man_ (London, 1843),
_Researches into the Physical History of Mankind_ (5 vols.,
1836-1847); T.H. Huxley, _Man's Place in Nature_ (London, 1863), and
"Geographical Distribution of Chief Modifications of Mankind," in
_Journ. Anthropological Institute_ for 1870; Theodore Waitz,
_Anthropologie der Naturvoelker_ (1859-1871); A. de Quatrefages,
_Histoire generale des races humaines_ (Paris, 1889); E.B. Tylor,
_Anthropology_ (1881); Lord Avebury, _Prehistoric Times_ (1865; 6th
ed., 1900) and _Origin of Civilization_ (1870; 6th ed., 1902); F.
Ratzel, _History of Mankind_ (Eng. trans., 1897); A.H. Keane,
_Ethnology_ (2nd ed., 1897), and _Man: Past and Present_ (2nd ed.,
1899); G. de Mortillet, _Le Prehistorique_ (Paris, 1882; 3rd ed.,
1900); D.G. Brinton, _Races and Peoples_ (1890); J. Deniker, The Races
of Man (London, 1900); Hutchinson's _Living Races of Mankind_ (1906).

FOOTNOTE:

[1] Writing in the _Geographical Journal_, March 1894, on "Evolution
of Indian Geography," he says: "The plants of Indian and African coal
measures are without exception identical, and among the few animals
which have been found in India one is indistinguishable from an
African species, another is closely allied, and both faunas are
characterized by the very remarkable genus group of reptiles
comprising the Dicynodon and other allied forms (see _Manual of
Geology of India_, 2nd ed. p. 203). These, however, are not the only
analogies, for near the coast of South Africa there are developed a
series of beds containing the plant fossils in the lower part and
marine shells in the upper, known as the Uitenhage series, which
corresponds exactly to the small patches of the Rajmahal series along
the east coast of India. The few plant forms found in the lower beds
of Africa are mostly identical with or closely allied to the Rajmahal
species, while of the very few marine shells in the Indian outcrops,
which are sufficiently well preserved for identification, at least
one species is identical with an African form. These very close
relationships between the plants and animals of India and Africa at
this remote period appear inexplicable unless there were direct land
communications between them over what is now the Indian Ocean. On the
east coast of India in the Khasi Hills, and on the coast of South
Africa, the marine fossils of late Jurassic and early cretaceous age
are largely identical with, or very closely allied to each other,
showing that they must have been inhabitants of one and the same
great sea. In western India the fossils of the same age belong to a
fauna which is found in the north of Madagascar, in northern and
eastern Africa, in western Asia, and ranges into Europe--a fauna
differing so radically from that of the eastern exposures that only a
few specimens of world-wide range are found in both. Seeing that the
distances between the separate outcrops containing representatives of
the two faunas are much less than those separating the outcrops from
the nearest ones of the same fauna, the only possible explanation of
the facts is that there was a continuous stretch of dry land
connecting South Africa and India and separating two distinct marine
zoological provinces."

ETHYL, in chemistry, the name given to the alkyl radical C2H5. The compounds containing this radical are treated under other headings; the hydride is better known as ethane, the alcohol, C2H5OH, is the ordinary alcohol of commerce, and the oxide (C2H5)2O is ordinary ether.