Chapter V: Ricardo and the True Classical Labor Theory
§ 1. General estimate of Ricardo’s theory 41
§ 2. At foundation an attempt to reconcile the “philosophical”
and “empirical” accounts 42
§ 3. Preliminary conditions of the theory laid down by Ricardo
himself 44
§ 4. How determine quantity of labor; unsatisfactory treatment
of skilled labor; labor indirectly applied 46
§ 5. The introduction of interest on capital as an element in
cost of production (i. e., entrepreneur’s cost) 49
§ 6. In Ricardo’s conception, interest enters into Natural Price
or Normal Value, though he does not make this clear 50
§ 7. Essence of Ricardo’s explanation of the complication of
interest 52
§ 8. Peculiarly round-about form of statement of the same 53
§ 9. Ricardo’s explanation of the complication also positively
misleading 55
§ 10. Summary 56
CHAPTER VI
MCCULLOCH, JAMES MILL AND TORRENS.
ANTICIPATION OF MARX’S THIRD VOLUME
§ 1. The interest which attaches to these three minor writers 61
§ 2. Samples of McCulloch’s extravagant dogmatism 62
§ 3. McCulloch anticipates Marx’s solution of the “organic
composition of capital” complication 64
§ 4. James Mill’s complete misapprehension of the nature of
the interest difficulty 70
§ 5. False move made by Torrens in defining the concept of
entrepreneur’s cost 74
§ 6. Shallow attempt of Torrens to avoid the interest difficulty
by a theory of “accumulated labour” 76
CHAPTER VII
THE EMPIRICAL THEORY AS DEVELOPED BY MALTHUS
§ 1. Malthus a prolific writer on value, and opponent of Ricardo 79
§ 2. An important transfer of emphasis from the “philosophical”
to the “empirical” account 79
§ 3. The law of costs made subordinate to the law of supply and
demand 80
§ 4. Detailed criticism of Ricardo’s labor-cost theory 83
§ 5. Majority of these points of criticism provided for by Ricardo
himself 85
§ 6. Difference between the two economists partly one of emphasis:
ultimate gain of Malthus’ theory 86
§ 7. Note on the question of the invariable measure of value for
all times and places 88
CHAPTER VIII
SENIOR
§ 1. Opening of his discussion very unfavorable to old labor cost
philosophy 93
§ 2. Originates a consistent conception of subjective cost of
production,—labor and abstinence 95
§ 3. Approaches a theory of final equivalence of utility and
disutility 96
§ 4. Values produced would be in proportion to subjective cost
of production were there no rents 98
§ 5. Remarkable extension of the rent concept 99
§ 6. The universal prevalence of rent in real life nullifies
the law of subjective costs 101
§ 7. Net result of Senior’s reasonings very destructive of
labor-cost theory 102
CHAPTER IX
JOHN STUART MILL
§ 1. Begins with “empirical” laws of supply and demand, and of
entrepreneur’s costs 104
§ 2. Scant attention paid to subjective costs 106
§ 3. Wavers concerning inclusion of “profits” in cost: an
illustration of the inadequacy of the ancient
philosophy of value 107
§ 4. Follows Ricardo, without the slightest improvement in
his explanation of the interest complication 108
§ 5. Departs from Ricardo in admitting that case of skilled
labor necessitates qualification of the labor-cost theory 110
§ 6. Summary: the labor theory weakened; comparison with Malthus
and Senior 112
Comments
Log in to leave a comment.
History and criticism of the labor theory of value in English political economyChapter V: Ricardo and the True Classical Labor Theory
0%2 min left in chapter