Skip to content

Chapter X: Star-Fish and Sea-Urchins (2)

Text size

The loss of co-ordination between the rays caused by division of the nerve-ring in the disc is rendered most conspicuous in Brittle-stars, from the circumstance that in locomotion and in righting so much here depends upon co-ordinated muscular contraction of the rays. Thus, for instance, when a Brittle-star has its nerve-ring severed between each ray, an interesting series of events follows. First, there is a long period of profound shock--spontaneity, and even irritability, being almost suspended, and the rays appearing to be rigid, as if in tetanic spasm. After a time, feeble spontaneity returns--the animal, however, not moving in any determinate direction. Irritability also returns, but only for the rays immediately irritated, stimulation of one ray causing active writhing movements in that ray, but not affecting, or only feebly affecting, the other rays. The animal, therefore, is quite unable to escape from the source of irritation, the aimless movements of the rays now forming a very marked contrast to the instantaneous and vigorous leaping movements of escape which are manifested by unmutilated specimens. Moreover, unmutilated specimens will vigorously leap away, not only from stimulation of the rays, but also from that of the disc; but those with their nerve-ring cut make no attempts to escape, even from the most violent stimulation of the disc. In other words, the disc is entirely severed from all physiological connection with the rays.

If the nerve-ring be divided at two points, one on either side of a ray, that ray becomes physiologically separated from the rest of the organism. If the two nerve-divisions are so placed as to include two adjacent rays--_i.e._ if one cut is on one side of a ray and the other on the further side of an adjacent ray--then these two rays remain in physiological continuity with one another, although they suffer physiological separation from the other three. When a Brittle-star is completely divided into two portions, one portion having two arms and the other three, both portions begin actively to turn over on their backs, again upon their faces, again upon their backs, and so on alternately for an indefinite number of times. These movements arise from the rays, under the influence of stimulation caused by the section, seeking to perform their natural movements of leaping, which however end, on account of the weight of the other rays being absent, in turning themselves over. An entire Brittle-star when placed on its back after division of its nerve-ring is not able to right itself, owing to the destruction of co-ordination among its rays. Astropecten, under similar circumstances, at first bends its rays about in various ways, with a preponderant disposition to the tulip form, and keeps its ambulacral feet in active movement. But after half an hour, or an hour, the feet generally become retracted and the rays nearly motionless--the animal, like a Brittle-star, remaining permanently on its back. In this, as in other species, the effect of dividing the nerve-ring on either side of a ray is that of destroying its physiological connection with the rest of the animal, the feet in that ray, although still remaining feebly active, no longer taking part in any co-ordinated movement--that ray, therefore, being merely dragged along by the others.

Under this division it only remains further to be said, that section of the nerve-ring in the disc, or the nerve-trunks of the rays, although, as we have seen, so completely destroying physiological continuity in the rows of ambulacral feet and muscular system of the animal, does not destroy physiological continuity in the external nerve-plexus; for however much the nerve-ring and nerve-trunks may be injured, stimulation of the dorsal surface of the animal throws all the ambulacral feet and all the muscular system of the rays into active movement. This fact proves that the ambulacral feet and the muscles are all held in nervous connection with one another by the external plexus, without reference to the integrity of the main nerve-trunks.

2. _Echini._--_Section of external surface of shell._--If a cork-borer be applied to the external surface of the shell of an Echinus, and rotated there till the calcareous substance of the shell is reached, and therefore a continuous circular section of the over-lying tissues effected, it is invariably found that the spines and pedicellariæ within the circular area are physiologically separated from the contiguous spines and pedicellariæ, as regards local reflex excitability. That is to say, if any part of this circular area be stimulated, all the spines and pedicellariæ within that area immediately respond to the stimulation in the ordinary way; while none of the spines or pedicellariæ surrounding the area are affected. Similarly, if any part of the shell external to the circumscribed area be stimulated, the spines and pedicellariæ within that area are not affected. These facts prove that the function which is manifested by these appendages of localizing and gathering round a seat of stimulation, is exclusively dependent upon the external nerve-plexus. It is needless to add that in this experiment it does not signify of what size or shape or by what means the physiological island is made, so long as the destruction of the nervous plexus by a closed curve of injury is rendered complete. In order to ascertain whether, in the case of an unclosed curve of injury, any irradiation of a stimulus would take place round the ends of the curve, we made sundry kinds of section. It is, however, needless to describe these, for they all showed that, after injury of a part of the plexus, there is no irradiation of the stimulus round the ends of the injury. Thus, for instance, if a short straight line of injury be made, by drawing the point of a scalpel over the shell, say along the equator of the animal, and if a stimulus be afterwards applied on either side of that line, even quite close to one of its ends, no effect will be exerted on the spines or pedicellariæ on the other side of the line. This complete inability of a stimulus to escape round the ends of an injury, forms a marked contrast to the almost unlimited degree in which such escape takes place in the more primitive nervous plexus of the Medusæ.

Although the nervous connections on which the spines and pedicellariæ depend for their function of localizing and closing round a seat of stimulation are thus shown to be completely destroyed by injury of the external plexus, other nervous connections, upon which another function of the spines depends, are not in the smallest degree impaired by such injury. The other function to which I allude is that which brings about the general co-ordinated action of all the spines for the purposes of locomotion. That this function is not impaired by injury of the external plexus is proved by the fact that if the area within a closed line of injury on the surface of the shell be strongly irritated, all the spines over the whole surface begin to manifest their peculiar bristling movements, and by this co-ordinated action rapidly move the animal in a straight line of escape from the source of irritation; the injury to the external plexus, although completely separating the spines enclosed by it from their neighbouring spines as regards what may be called their local function of seizing the instrument of stimulation, nevertheless leaves them in undisturbed connection with all the other spines in the organism as regards what may be called their universal function of locomotion.

Evidently, therefore, this more universal function must depend upon some other set of nervous connections; and experiment shows that these are distributed over all the _internal_ surface of the shell. Our mode of experimenting was to divide the animal into two hemispheres, remove all the internal organs of both hemispheres (these operations producing no impairment of any of the functions of the pedicels, spines, or pedicellariæ), and then to paint with strong acid the inside of the shell--completely washing out the acid after about a quarter of a minute's exposure. The results of a number of experiments conducted on this method may be thus epitomized:--

The effect of painting the back or inside of the shell with strong acid (_e.g._ pure HCl) is that of at first strongly stimulating the spines into bristling movements, and soon afterwards reducing them to a state of quiescence, in which they lie more or less flat, and in a peculiarly confused manner that closely resembles the appearance of corn when "laid" by the wind. The spines have now entirely lost both their spontaneity and their power of responding to a stimulus applied on the external surface of the shell--_i.e._ their local reflex excitability, or power of closing in upon a source of irritation. These effects may be produced over the whole external surface of the shell, by painting the whole of the internal surface; but if any part of the internal surface be left unpainted, the corresponding part of the external surface remains uninjured. Conversely, if all the internal surface be left unpainted except in certain lines or patches, it will only be corresponding lines and patches on the external surface that suffer injury. It makes no difference whether these lines or patches be painted in the course of the ambulacral feet, or anywhere in the inter-ambulacral spaces.

The above remarks, which have reference to the spines, apply equally to the pedicellariæ, except that their spontaneity and reflex irritability are not destroyed, but only impaired.

Some hours after the operation it usually happens that the spontaneity and reflex irritability of the spines return, though in a feeble degree, and also those of the pedicellariæ, in a more marked degree. This applies especially to the reflex irritability of the pedicellariæ; for while their spontaneity does not return in full degree, their reflex irritability does--or almost in full degree.

These experiments, therefore, seem to point to the conclusions--1st, that the general co-ordination of the spines is dependent on the integrity of an internal nerve-plexus; 2nd, that the internal plexus is everywhere in intimate connection with the external; and 3rd, that complete destruction of the former, while profoundly influencing the functions of the latter, nevertheless does not wholly destroy them.

Professor Ewart therefore undertook carefully to examine the internal surface of the shell, to see whether any evidence of this internal nervous plexus could be found microscopically, and, after a great deal of trouble, he has succeeded in doing so. But as he has not yet published his results, I shall not forestall them further than to say that this internal plexus spreads all over the inside of the shell, and is everywhere in communication with the external plexus by means of fibres which pass between the sides of the hexagonal plates of which the shell of the animal is composed. Thus we can understand how it is that when a portion of the external plexus is isolated from the rest of that plexus as a result of the cork-borer experiment, the island still remains in communication with the nerve-centres which preside over the co-ordination of the spines, as proved by the fact of the Echinus using its spines to escape from irritation applied to the area included within the circle of injury to the external plexus produced by the cork-borer.

Now, where are these nerve-centres situated? We have just seen that we have evidence of the presence of such centres somewhere in an Echinus, seeing that all the spines exhibit such perfect co-ordination in their movements. Where, then, are these centres?

Seeing that in a Star-fish the rays are co-ordinated in their action by means of the pentagonal ring in the disc, analogy pointed to the nervous ring round the mouth of an Echinus as the part of the nervous system which most probably presides over the co-ordinated action of the spines. Accordingly, we tried the effect of removing this nervous ring, and immediately obtained conclusive proof that this was the centre of which we were in search; for as soon as the nervous ring was removed, the Echinus lost, completely and permanently, all power of co-ordination among its spines. That is to say, after this operation these organs were never again used by the animal for the purposes of locomotion, and no matter how severe an injury we applied, the Echinus, when placed on a table, did not seek to escape. But the spines were not wholly paralyzed, or motionless. On the contrary, their power of spontaneous movement continued unimpaired, as did also their power of closing round a seat of irritation on the external surface of the shell. The same remark applies to the pedicellariæ, and the explanation is simple. It is the external nervous plexus which holds all the spines and pedicellariæ in communication with one another as by a network; so that when any part of this network is irritated, all the spines and pedicellariæ in the neighbourhood move over to the seat of irritation. On the other hand, it is the internal plexus which serves to unite all the spines to the nerve-centre which surrounds the mouth, and which alone is competent to co-ordinate the action of all the spines for the purposes of locomotion.

It remains to consider whether the ambulacral feet exhibit any general co-ordinated action, and, if so, whether this likewise depends upon the same nerve-centre.

The fact already mentioned, that during progression an Echinus uses some of its feet for crawling and others for feeling its way, is enough to suggest that all the feet are co-ordinated by a nerve-centre. But in order to be quite sure about the fact of there being a general co-ordination among all the feet, we tried the following experiments.

I have already described the righting movements which are performed by an Echinus when the animal is inverted, and it will be remembered that in this animal the manoeuvre is effected by means of the feet alone. At first sight this might almost seem sufficient to prove the fact of a general co-ordination among the feet; but further reflection will show that it is not so. For the feet being all arranged in regular series, when one row begins to effect the rotation of the globe, it may very well be that its further rotation in the same direction is due only to the fact that the slight tilt produced by the pulling of the first feet in the series A, B, C gives the next feet in the series D, E, F an opportunity of reaching the floor of the tank; their adhesions being established, they would tend by their pulling to increase still further the tilt of the globe, thus giving the next feet in the series an opportunity of fastening to the floor of the tank, and so on. In order, therefore, to see whether these righting movements were due to nervous co-ordination among the feet, or merely to the accident of the serial arrangement of the feet, we tried the experiments which I shall now detail.

First of all we took an Echinus, and by means of a thread suspended it upside-down in a tank of water half-way up the side of the tank, and in such a way that only the feet on one side of the ab-oral pole were able to reach the perpendicular wall of the tank. These feet as quickly as possible established their adhesions to the perpendicular wall, and, the thread being then removed, the Echinus was left sticking to the side of the tank in an inverted position by means of the ab-oral ends of two adjacent feet-rows (Fig. 59). Under these circumstances, as we should expect from the previous experiments, the animal sets about righting itself as quickly as possible. Now, if the righting action of the feet were entirely and only of a serial character, the righting would require to be performed by rearing the animal upwards; the effect of foot after foot in the same rows being applied in succession to the side of the tank, would require to be that of rotating the globular shell against the side of the tank towards the surface of the water, and therefore against the action of gravity. This is sometimes done, which proves that the energy required to perform the feat is not more than a healthy Echinus can expend. But much more frequently the Echinus adopts another device, and the only one by which it is possible for him to attain his purpose without the labour of rotating upwards: he rotates laterally and downwards in the form of a spiral. Thus, let us call the five feet-rows, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 (Figs. 59, 60, 61), and suppose that 1 and 2 are in use near their ab-oral ends in holding the animal inverted against the perpendicular side of a tank. The downward spiral rotation would then be effected by gradually releasing the outer feet in row 1, and simultaneously attaching the outer feet in row 2 (_i.e._ those nearest to row 3, and furthest from row 1), as far as possible to the outer side of that row. The effect of this is to make the globe roll far enough to that side to enable the inner feet of row 3 (_i.e._ those nearest to row 2), when fully protruded, to touch the side of the tank. They establish their adhesions, and the residue of feet in row 1, now leaving go their hold, these new adhesions serve to roll the globe still further round in the same direction of lateral rotation, and so the process proceeds from row to row; but the globe does not merely roll along in a horizontal direction, or at the same level in the water, for each new row that comes into action takes care, so to speak, that the feet which it employs shall be those which are as far below the level of the feet in the row last employed as their length when fully protruded (_i.e._ their power of touching the tank) renders possible. The rotation of the globe thus becomes a double one, lateral and downwards, till the animal assumes its normal position with its oral pole against the perpendicular tank wall. So considerable is the rotation in the downward direction, that the normal position is generally attained before one complete lateral, or equatorial, rotation is completed.

Figs. 50, 60, and 61 are righting movements of Echinus on a
perpendicular surface.]

The result of this experiment, therefore, implies that the righting movements are due to something more than the merely successive action of the series of feet to which the work of righting the animal may happen to be given. The same conclusion is pointed to by the results of the following experiment.

A number of vigorous Echini were thoroughly shaved with a scalpel over the whole half of one hemisphere, _i.e._ the half from the equator to the oral pole. They were then inverted on their ab-oral poles. The object of the experiment was to see what the Echini which were thus deprived of the lower half of three feet-rows would do when, in executing their righting manoeuvres, they attained to the equatorial position and then found no feet wherewith to continue the manoeuvre. The result of this experiment was first of all to show us that the Echini invariably chose the unmutilated feet-rows wherewith to right themselves. Probably this is to be explained, either by the general principle to which the escape from injury is due--viz. that injury inflicted on one side of an Echinoderm stimulates into increased activity the locomotor organs of the opposite side,--or by the consideration that destruction of the lower half of a row very probably induces some degree of shock in the remaining half, and so leaves the corresponding parts of the unmutilated rows prepotent over the mutilated one. Be this as it may, however, we found that the difficulty was easily overcome by tilting the animal over upon its mutilated feet-rows sufficiently far to prevent the unmutilated rows from reaching the floor of the tank. When held steadily in this position for a short time, the mutilated rows established their adhesions, and the Echinus was then left to itself. Under these circumstances an Echinus will always continue the manoeuvre along the mutilated feet-rows with which it was begun, till the globe reaches the position of resting upon its equator, and therefore arrives at the line where the shaved area commences. The animal then remains for hours in this position, with a gradual but continuous motion backwards, which appears to be due to the successive slipping of the spines--these organs in the righting movements being always used as props for the ambulacral feet to pull against while rearing the globe to its equatorial position, and in performing this function on a slate floor the spines are liable often to slip. The only other motion exhibited by Echini thus situated is that of a slow rolling movement, now to one side and now to another, according to the prepotency of the pull exerted by this or that row of ambulacral feet. Things continue in this way until the slow backward movement happens to bring the animal against some side of the tank, when the uninjured rows of ambulacral feet immediately adhere to the surface and rotate the animal upwards or horizontally, until it attains the normal position. But if care be taken to prevent contact with any side of the tank, the mutilated Echinus will remain propped on its equator for days; it never adopts the simple expedient of reversing the action of its mutilated feet-rows, so as to bring the globe again upon its ab-oral pole and get its unmutilated feet-rows into action.

From this we may conclude that the righting movements of the pedicels are due, not to the merely serial action of the pedicels, but to their co-ordination by a nerve-centre acting under a stimulus supplied by a sense of gravity; for if the movements of the pedicels were merely of a serial character, we should not expect that the equatorial position, having been attained under these circumstances, should be permanently maintained. We should not expect this, because after a while the pedicels, which are engaged in maintaining the globe in its equatorial position, must become exhausted and relax their hold, when those next behind in the series would lay hold of the bottom of the tank, and so on, the rotation of the globe thus proceeding in the opposite direction to that in which it had previously taken place. On the other hand, if the righting movements of the pedicels are due to co-ordination proceeding from a nerve-centre acting under a sense of gravity, we should expect the animal under the circumstances mentioned to remain permanently reared upon its equator; for this would allow that the nerve-centre was always persistently, though fruitlessly, endeavouring to co-ordinate the action of the absent feet.

Further, as proof that the ambulacral feet of Echinus are under the control of some centralizing apparatus when executing the righting manoeuvre, we may state one other fact. When the righting manoeuvre. is nearly completed by the rows engaged in executing it, the lower feet in the other rows become strongly protruded and curved downwards, in anticipation of shortly coming into contact with the floor of the tank when the righting manoeuvre shall have been completed (see Fig. 52, p. 280). This fact tends to show that all the ambulacral feet of the animal are, like all the spines, held in mutual communication with one another by some centralizing mechanism.

But the best proof of all that the feet in executing the righting manoeuvre are under the influence of a co-ordinating centre, is one that arose from an experiment suggested to me by Mr. Francis Darwin, and which I shall now describe. Mr. Darwin having kindly sent the apparatus which his father and himself had used in their experiments on the geotropism of plants, it was employed thus. A healthy Echinus was placed in a large bottle filled to the brim with sea-water, and having been inverted on the bottom of the bottle, it was allowed in that position to establish its adhesions. The bottle was then corked and mounted on an upright wheel of the apparatus whereby, by means of clockwork, it could be kept in continual slow rotation in a vertical plane. The object of this was to ascertain whether the continuous rotation in a vertical plane would prevent the animal from righting itself (because confusing the nerve-centres which, under ordinary circumstances, could feel by their sense of gravity which was up and which was down), or would still allow the animal to right itself (because not interfering with the serial action of the feet). Well, it was found that this rotation of the whole animal in a vertical plane entirely prevented the righting movements during any length of time that it might be continued, and that these movements were immediately resumed as soon as the rotation was allowed to cease. This, moreover, was the case, no matter what phase of the righting manoeuvre the Echinus might have reached at the moment when the rotation began. Thus, for instance, if the globe were allowed to have reached the position of resting on its equator before the rotation was commenced, the Echinus would remain motionless, holding on with its equatorial feet, so long as the rotation was kept up.

Therefore, there can be no question that the ambulacral feet are all under the influence of a co-ordinating nerve-centre, quite as much as are the spines. But, on the other hand, experiments show that the centre in this case is not of so localized a character as it is in the case of the spines; for when the nerve-ring is cut out, the co-ordination of the feet, although impaired, is not wholly destroyed. Take, for instance, the case of the righting manoeuvre. The effect of cutting out the nerve-ring is that of entirely destroying the ability to perform this manoeuvre in the case of the majority of specimens; nevertheless about one in ten continue able to perform it. Again, if an Echinus is divided into two hemispheres by an incision carried from pole to pole through any meridian, the two hemispheres will live for days, crawling about in the same manner as entire animals; if their ocular plates are not injured, they seek the light, and when inverted they right themselves. The same observations apply to smaller segments, and even to single detached rows of ambulacral feet. The latter are, of course, analogous to the single detached rays of a Star-fish, so far as the system of ambulacral feet is concerned; but, looking to the more complicated apparatus of locomotion (spines and pedicellariæ), as well as to the rigid consistence and awkward shape of the segment--standing erect, instead of lying flat--the appearance presented by such a segment in locomotion is much more curious, if not surprising, than that presented by the analogous part of a Star-fish under similar circumstances. It is still more surprising that such a fifth-part segment of an Echinus will, when propped up on its ab-oral pole (Fig. 62), right itself (Fig. 63) after the manner of larger segments or entire animals. They, however, experience more difficulty in doing so, and very often, or indeed generally, fail to complete the manoeuvre.

On the whole, then, we may conclude that the nervous system of an Echinus consists (1) of an external plexus which serves to unite all the feet, spines, and pedicellariæ together, so that they all approximate a point of irritation situated anywhere in that plexus; (2) of an internal nervous plexus which is everywhere in communication through the thickness of the shell with the external, and the function of which is that of bringing the feet, spines, and probably also the pedicellariæ into relation with the great co-ordinating nerve-centre situated round the mouth; (3) of central nervous matter which is mainly gathered round the mouth, and there presides exclusively over the co-ordinated action of the spines, and in large part also over the co-ordinated action of the feet, but which is further in part distributed along the courses of the main nerve-trunks, and so secures co-ordination of feet even in separated segments of the animal.

_Special Senses._

Before concluding, I must say a few words on the experiments whereby we sought to test for the presence in Echinoderms of the special senses of sight and smell.

We have found unequivocal evidence of the Star-fish (with the exception of the Brittle-stars) and the Echini manifesting a strong disposition to crawl towards, and remain in, the light. Thus, if a large tank be completely darkened, except at one end where a narrow slit of light is admitted, and if a number of Star-fish and Echini be scattered over the floor of the tank, in a few hours the whole number, with the exception of perhaps a few per cent., will be found congregated in the narrow slit of light. The source we used was diffused daylight, which was admitted through two sheets of glass, so that the thermal rays might be considered practically excluded. The _intensity_ of the light which the Echinoderms are able to perceive may be very feeble indeed; for in our first experiments we boarded up the face of the tank with ordinary pinewood, in order to exclude the light over all parts of the tank except at one narrow slit between two of the boards. On taking down the boards we found, indeed, the majority of the specimens in or near the slit of light; but we also found a number of other specimens gathering all the way along the glass face of the tank that was immediately behind the pine-boards. On repeating the experiment with blackened boards, this was never found to be the case; so there can be no doubt that in the first experiments the animals were attracted by the faint glimmer of the white boards, as illuminated by the very small amount of light scattered from the narrow slit through a tank, all the other sides of which were black slate. Indeed, towards the end of the tank, where some of the specimens were found, so feeble must have been the intensity of this glimmer, that we doubt whether even human eyes could have discerned it very distinctly. Owing to the prisms at our command not having sufficient dispersive power for the experiments, and not wishing to rely on the uncertain method of employing coloured glass, we were unable to ascertain how the Echinoderms might be affected by different rays.

On removing with a pointed scalpel the eye-spots from a number of Star-fish and Echini, without otherwise injuring the animals, the latter no longer crawled towards the light, even though this were admitted to the tank in abundance; but they crawled promiscuously in all directions. On the other hand, if only one out of the five eye-spots were left intact, the animals crawled towards the light as before. It may be added that single detached rays of Star-fish and fifth-part segments of Echini crawl towards the light in the same manner as entire animals, provided, of course, that the eye-spot is not injured.

The presence of a sense of smell in Star-fish was proved by keeping some of these animals for several days in a tank without food, and then presenting them with small pieces of shell-fish. The Star-fish immediately perceived the proximity of food, as shown by their immediately crawling towards it. Moreover, if a small piece of the food were held in a pair of forceps and gently withdrawn as the Star-fish approached it, the animal could be led about the floor of the tank in any direction, just as a hungry dog could be led about by continually withdrawing from his nose a piece of meat as he continually follows it up. This experiment, however, was only successful with Star-fish which had been kept fasting for several days; freshly caught Star-fish were not nearly so keen in their manifestations, and indeed in many cases did not notice the food at all.

Desiring to ascertain whether the sense of smell were localized in any particular organs, as we had found to be the case with the sense of sight, I first tried the effect of removing the five ocelli. This produced no difference in the result of the above experiment with hungry Star-fish, and therefore I next tried the effect of cutting off the tips of the rays. The Star-fish behaving as before, I then progressively truncated the rays, and thus eventually found that the olfactory sense was equally distributed throughout their length. The question, however, still remained whether it was equally distributed over both the upper and the lower surfaces. I therefore tried the effect of varnishing the upper surface. The Star-fish continued to find its food as before, which showed that the sense of smell was distributed along the lower surface. I could not try the converse experiment of varnishing this surface, because I should thereby have hindered the action of the ambulacral feet. But by another method I was able nearly as well to show that the upper surface does not participate in smelling. This method consisted in placing a piece of shell-fish upon the upper surface and allowing it to rest there. When this was done, the Star-fish made no attempt to remove the morsel of food by brushing it off with the tips of its rays, as is the habit of the animal when any irritating substance is applied to this surface. Therefore I conclude that the upper or dorsal surface of a Star-fish takes no part in ministering to the sense of smell, which by the experiment of varnishing this surface, and also by that of progressively truncating the rays, is proved to be distributed over the whole of the ventral or lower surface of the animal. For I must add that severed rays behave in all these respects like the entire organisms, although they are disconnected from the mouth and disc.

As this chapter has already extended to so great a length, I omit from it any account of some further experiments which I tried concerning the effects of nerve-poisons upon the Echinodermata. A full record of these experiments may be found in the publications of the Linnean Society.

FINIS.

THE

INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC SERIES.

Each book complete in One Volume, 12mo, and bound in Cloth.

1. THE FORMS OF WATER IN CLOUDS AND RIVERS, ICE AND GLACIERS. By
J. TYNDALL, LL.D., F.R.S. With 35 Illustrations. $1.50.

2. PHYSICS AND POLITICS; or, Thoughts on the Application of the
Principles of "Natural Selection" and "Inheritance" to Political
Society. By WALTER BAGEHOT. $1.50.

3. FOODS. By EDWARD SMITH, M.D., LL.B., F.R.S. With numerous
Illustrations. $1.75.

4. MIND AND BODY: The Theories of their Relation. By ALEXANDER
BAIN, LL.D. With 4 Illustrations. $1.50.

5. THE STUDY OF SOCIOLOGY. By HERBERT SPENCER. $1.50.

6. THE NEW CHEMISTRY. By Professor J. P. COOKE, Harvard
University. With 31 Illustrations. $2.00.

7. THE CONSERVATION OF ENERGY. By BALFOUR STEWART, M.A., LL.D.,
F.R.S. With 14 Illustrations. $1.50.

8. ANIMAL LOCOMOTION; or, Walking, Swimming, and Flying. By J.
B. PETTIGREW, M.D., F.R.S., etc. With 130 Illustrations. $1.75.

9. RESPONSIBILITY IN MENTAL DISEASE. By HENRY MAUDSLEY, M.D.,
$1.50.

10. THE SCIENCE OF LAW. By Professor SHELDON AMOS. $1.75.

11. ANIMAL MECHANISM: A Treatise on Terrestrial and Aërial
Locomotion. By Professor E. J. MAREY, College of France. With
117 Illustrations. $1.75.

12. THE HISTORY OF THE CONFLICT BETWEEN RELIGION AND SCIENCE. By
J. W. DRAPER, M.D., LL.D. $1.75.

13. THE DOCTRINE OF DESCENT AND DARWINISM. By Professor OSCAR
SCHMIDT, Strasburg University. With 26 Illustrations. $1.50.

14. THE CHEMISTRY OF LIGHT AND PHOTOGRAPHY IN THEIR APPLICATION
TO ART, SCIENCE, AND INDUSTRY. By Dr. HERMANN VOGEL, Royal
Industrial Academy of Berlin. With 100 Illustrations. $2.00

15. FUNGI: Their Nature and Uses. By M. C. COOKE, M.A., LL.D.
Edited by the Rev. M. J. BERKELEY, M.A., F.L.S. With 109
Illustrations. $1.50.

16. THE LIFE AND GROWTH OF LANGUAGE. By Professor WILLIAM DWIGHT
WHITNEY, Yale College. $1.50.

17. MONEY AND THE MECHANISM OF EXCHANGE. By W. STANLEY JEVONS,
M.A., F.R.S. $1.75.

18. THE NATURE OF LIGHT, with a General Account of Physical
Optics. By Dr. EUGENE LOMMEL. With 188 Illustrations and a Table
of Spectra in Colors. $2.00

19. ANIMAL PARASITES AND MESSMATES. By Professor P. J. VAN
BENEDEN, University of Louvain. With 83 Illustrations. $1.50.

20. FERMENTATION. By Professor P. SCHÜTZENBERGER. With 28
Illustrations. $1.50.

21. THE FIVE SENSES OF MAN. By Professor JULIUS BERNSTEIN,
University of Halle. With 91 Illustrations. $1.75.

22. THE THEORY OF SOUND IN ITS RELATION TO MUSIC. By Professor
PIETRO BLASERNA, Royal University of Rome. With numerous
Illustrations. $1.50.

23 STUDIES IN SPECTRUM ANALYSIS. By J. NORMAN LOCKYER, F.R.S.
With 7 Photographic Illustrations of Spectra, and 52 other
Illustrations. $2.50.

24. A HISTORY OF THE GROWTH OF THE STEAM-ENGINE. By Professor R.
H. THURSTON, Cornell University. With 163 Illustrations. $2.50.

25. EDUCATION AS A SCIENCE. By ALEXANDER BAIN, LL.D. $1.75.

26. STUDENTS' TEXT-BOOK OF COLOR; or, Modern Chromatics. With
Applications to Art and Industry. By Professor OGDEN N. ROOD,
Columbia College. With 130 Illustrations. $2.00.

27. THE HUMAN SPECIES. By Professor A. DE QUATREFAGES, Museum of
Natural History, Paris. $2.00.

28. THE CRAYFISH: An Introduction to the Study of Zoölogy. By T.
H. HUXLEY, F.R.S. With 82 Illustrations. $1.75.

29. THE ATOMIC THEORY. By Professor A. WURTZ. Translated by E.
CLEMINSHAW, F.C.S. With Illustrative Chart. $1.50.

30. ANIMAL LIFE AS AFFECTED BY THE NATURAL CONDITIONS OF
EXISTENCE. By Professor KARL SEMPER, University of Würzburg.
With 106 Illustrations and 2 Maps. $2.00.

31. SIGHT: An Exposition of the Principles of Monocular
and Binocular Vision. By Professor JOSEPH LE CONTE, LL.D.,
University of California. With 132 Illustrations. $1.50.

32. GENERAL PHYSIOLOGY OF MUSCLES AND NERVES. By Professor I.
ROSENTHAL, University of Erlangen. With 75 Illustrations. $1.50.

33. ILLUSIONS: A Psychological Study. By JAMES SULLY. $1.50.

34. THE SUN. By Professor C. A. YOUNG, College of New Jersey.
With 83 Illustrations. $2.00.

35. VOLCANOES; What they Are and What they Teach. By Professor
JOHN W. JUDD, F.R.S., Royal School of Mines. With 96
Illustrations. $2.00.

36. SUICIDE: An Essay in Comparative Moral Statistics. By
Professor HENRY MORSELLI, M.D., Royal University, Turin. With 4
Statistical Maps. $1.75.

37. THE FORMATION OF VEGETABLE MOULD, THROUGH THE ACTION OF
WORMS. With Observations on their Habits. By CHARLES DARWIN,
LL.D., F.R.S. With 16 Illustrations. $1.50.

38. THE CONCEPTS AND THEORIES OF MODERN PHYSICS. By J. B.
STALLO. $1.75.

39. THE BRAIN AND ITS FUNCTIONS. By J. LUYS, Hospice
Salpêtrière, Paris. With 6 Illustrations. $1.50.

40. MYTH AND SCIENCE. By TITO VIGNOLI. $1.50.

41. DISEASES OF MEMORY: An Essay in the Positive Psychology. By
TH. RIBOT, author of "Heredity." $1.50.

42. ANTS, BEES. AND WASPS. A Record of Observations of the
Habits of the Social Hymonoptera. By Sir JOHN LUBBOCK, Bart.,
F.R.S., etc. $2.00.

43. THE SCIENCE OF POLITICS. By Professor SHELDON AMOS, $1.75.

44. ANIMAL INTELLIGENCE. By GEORGE J. ROMANES, M.D., F.R.S.
$1.75.

45. MAN BEFORE METALS. By Professor N. JOLY, Science Faculty of
Toulouse. With 148 Illustrations. $1.75.

46. THE ORGANS OF SPEECH AND THEIR APPLICATION IN THE FORMATION
OF ARTICULATE SOUNDS. By Professor G. H. VON MEYER, University
of Zürich. With 47 Illustrations. $1.75.

47. FALLACIES: A View of Logic from the Practical Side. By
ALFRED SIDGWICK, B.A., Oxon. $1.75.

48. ORIGIN OF CULTIVATED PLANTS. By ALPHONSE DE CANDOLLE. $2.00.

49. JELLY-FISH, STAR-FISH, AND SEA-URCHINS. A Research on
Primitive Nervous Systems. By GEORGE J. ROMANES, M.D., F.R.S.
With 63 Illustrations. $1.75.

50. THE COMMON SENSE OF THE EXACT SCIENCES. By WILLIAM KINGDON
CLIFFORD. With 100 Figures. $1.50.

51. PHYSICAL EXPRESSION: Its Modes and Principles. By FRANCIS
WARNER, M.D., Assistant Physician, London Hospital. With 51
Illustrations. $1.75.

52. ANTHROPOID APES. By Professor ROBERT HARTMANN, University of
Berlin. With 63 Illustrations. $1.75.

53. THE MAMMALIA IN THEIR RELATION TO PRIMEVAL TIMES. By
Professor OSCAR SCHMIDT, University of Strasburg. With 51
Illustrations. $1.50.

54. COMPARATIVE LITERATURE. By Professor H. M. POSNETT, M.A.,
University College, Auckland. $1.75.

55. EARTHQUAKES AND OTHER EARTH MOVEMENTS. By Professor JOHN
MILNE, Imperial College of Engineering, Tokio. With 38 Figures.
$1.75.

56. MICROBES, FERMENTS, AND MOULDS. By E. L. TROUESSART. With
107 Illustrations. $1.50.

57. THE GEOGRAPHICAL AND GEOLOGICAL DISTRIBUTION OF ANIMALS.
By Professor ANGELO HEILPRIN, Academy of Natural Sciences,
Philadelphia. $2.00.

58. WEATHER. A Popular Exposition of the Nature of Weather
Changes from Day to Day. With 96 Diagrams. By Hon. RALPH
ABERCROMBY. $1.75.

59. ANIMAL MAGNETISM. By ALFRED BINET and CHARLES FÉRÉ.
Assistant Physician, Hospice Salpêtrière, Paris. With 15
Figures. $1.50.

60. INTERNATIONAL LAW, with Materials for a Code of
International Law. By Professor LEONE LEVI, King's College.
London. $1.50.

61. THE GEOLOGICAL HISTORY OF PLANTS. With 79 Illustrations. By
Sir J. WILLIAM DAWSON, LL.D., F.R.S. $1.75.

62. ANTHROPOLOGY. An Introduction to the Study of Man and
Civilization. By EDWARD B. TYLOR, D.C.L., F.R.S. With 78
Illustrations. $2.00.

63. THE ORIGIN OF FLORAL STRUCTURES, THROUGH INSECT AND OTHER
AGENCIES. By the Rev. GEORGE HENSLOW, M.A., etc. With 88
Illustrations. $1.75.

64. THE SENSES, INSTINCTS, AND INTELLIGENCE OF ANIMALS, WITH
SPECIAL REFERENCE TO INSECTS. By Sir JOHN LUBBOCK, Bart.,
F.R.S., etc. With 118 Illustrations. $1.75.

65. THE PRIMITIVE FAMILY IN ITS ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT. By Dr.
C. N. STARCKE, University of Copenhagen. $1.75.

66. PHYSIOLOGY OF BODILY EXERCISE. By F. LAGRANGE, M.D. $1.75.

67. THE COLORS OF ANIMALS: Their Meaning and Use. By EDWARD
BAGNALL POULTON, F.R.S. With 36 Illustrations and 1 Colored
Plate. $1.75.

68. SOCIALISM: New and Old. By Professor WILLIAM GRAHAM, M.A.,
Queen's College, Belfast. $1.75.

69. MAN AND THE GLACIAL PERIOD. By Professor G. FREDERICK
WRIGHT, D.D., Oberlin Theological Seminary. With 108
Illustrations and 3 Maps. $1.75.

70. HANDBOOK OF GREEK AND LATIN PALÆOGRAPHY. By EDWARD MAUNDE
THOMPSON, D.C.L., etc. $2.00.

71. A HISTORY OF CRUSTACEA. Recent Malacostraca. By the Rev.
THOMAS R. R. STEBBING, M.A. With 51 Illustrations. $2.00.

72. RACE AND LANGUAGE. By Professor ANDRÉ LEFÈVRE,
Anthropological School, Paris. $1.50.

73. MOVEMENT, By E. J. MAREY. Translated by ERIC PRITCHARD,
M.A., M.B., B. Ch. (Oxon.). With 200 Illustrations. $1.75.

74. ICE-WORK, PRESENT AND PAST. By T. G. BONNEY, D. Sc., F.R.S.,
F.S.A., etc., Professor of Geology at University College,
London. $1.50.

75. WHAT IS ELECTRICITY? By JOHN TROWBRIDGE, S.D., Rumford
Professor and Lecturer on the Applications of Science to the
Useful Arts, Harvard University. Illustrated. $1.50.

76. THE EVOLUTION OF THE ART OF MUSIC. By C. HUBERT H. PARRY.
D.C.L., M.A., etc. $1.75.

New York: D. APPLETON & CO., 72 Fifth Avenue.

Transcriber's note:
The Advertisement that was originally at the front of the book
has been moved to the end. Minor spelling inconsistencies, mainly
hyphenated words, have been harmonized. Obvious typos have been
corrected. Paragraph breaks have been inserted both before and
after the table on page 148 (Chapter VII).

Comments

Log in to leave a comment.

Jelly-Fish, Star-Fish, and Sea-Urchins: Being a Research on Primitive Nervous SystemsChapter X: Star-Fish and Sea-Urchins (2)

0%29 min left in chapter