Chapter XCII: Letter 150: To Mr. Murray

"Nov. 29. 1813. Monday.

"You will act as you please upon that point; but whether I go or
stay, I shall not say another word on the subject till May--nor
then, unless quite convenient to yourself. I have many things I
wish to leave to your care, principally papers. The _vases_ need
not be now sent, as Mr. Ward is gone to Scotland. You are right
about the errata page; place it at the beginning. Mr. Perry is a
little premature in his compliments: these may do harm by exciting
expectation, and I think we ought to be above it--though I see the
next paragraph is on the _Journal_[113], which makes me suspect
_you_ as the author of both.

"Would it not have been as well to have said 'in two Cantos' in the
advertisement? they will else think of _fragments_, a species of
composition very well for _once_, like _one ruin_ in a _view_; but
one would not build a town of them. The Bride, such as it is, is my
first _entire_ composition of any length (except the Satire, and be
d----d to it), for The Giaour is but a string of passages, and
Childe Harold is, and I rather think always will be, unconcluded. I
return Mr. Hay's note, with thanks to him and you.

"There have been some epigrams on Mr. Ward: one I see to-day. The
first I did not see, but heard yesterday. The second seems very
bad. I only hope that Mr. Ward does not believe that I had any
connection with either. I like and value him too well to allow my
politics to contract into spleen, or to admire any thing intended
to annoy him or his. You need not take the trouble to answer this,
as I shall see you in the course of the afternoon.

"P.S. I have said this much about the epigrams, because I lived so
much in the _opposite camp_, and, from my post as an engineer,
might be suspected as the flinger of these hand-grenadoes; but with
a worthy foe, I am all for open war, and not this bushfighting, and
have not had, nor will have, any thing to do with it. I do not know
the author."

[Footnote 113: Penrose's Journal.]

* * * * *

TO MR. MURRAY.

"Nov. 30. 1813.

"Print this at the end of _all that is of 'The Bride of Abydos_,'
as an errata page. BN.

"Omitted, Canto 2d, page 47., after line 449.,

"So that those arms cling closer round my neck.

Read,

"Then if my lip once murmur, it must be
No sigh for safety, but a prayer for thee."

* * * * *

TO MR. MURRAY.

"Tuesday evening, Nov. 30. 1813.

"For the sake of correctness, particularly in an errata page, the
alteration of the couplet I have just sent (half an hour ago) must
take place, in spite of delay or cancel; let me see the _proof_
early to-morrow. I found out _murmur_ to be a neuter _verb_, and
have been obliged to alter the line so as to make it a substantive,
thus--

"The deepest murmur of this lip shall be
No sigh for safety, but a prayer for thee!

Don't send the copies to the _country_ till this is all right."

* * * * *

TO MR. MURRAY.

"Dec. 2. 1813.

"When you can, let the couplet enclosed be inserted either in the
page, or in the errata page. I trust it is in time for some of the
copies. This alteration is in the same part--the page _but one_
before the last correction sent.

"P.S. I am afraid, from all I hear, that people are rather
inordinate in their expectations, which is very unlucky, but cannot
now be helped. This comes of Mr. Perry and one's wise friends; but
do not _you_ wind _your_ hopes of success to the same pitch, for
fear of accidents, and I can assure you that my philosophy will
stand the test very fairly; and I have done every thing to ensure
you, at all events, from positive loss, which will be some
satisfaction to both."

* * * * *

TO MR. MURRAY.

"Dec. 3. 1813.

"I send you a _scratch_ or _two_, the which _heal_. The Christian
Observer is very savage, but certainly well written--and quite
uncomfortable at the naughtiness of book and author. I rather
suspect you won't much like the _present_ to be more moral, if it
is to share also the usual fate of your virtuous volumes.

"Let me see a proof of the six before incorporation."

* * * * *

TO MR. MURRAY.

"Monday evening, Dec. 6. 1813.

"It is all very well, except that the lines are not numbered
properly, and a diabolical mistake, page 67., which _must_ be
corrected with the _pen_, if no other way remains; it is the
omission of '_not_' before '_disagreeable_,' in the _note_ on the
_amber_ rosary. This is really horrible, and nearly as bad as the
stumble of mine at the threshold--I mean the _misnomer_ of Bride.
Pray do not let a copy go without the '_not_;' it is nonsense, and
worse than nonsense as it now stands. I wish the printer was
saddled with a vampire.

"P.S. It is still _hath_ instead of _have_ in page 20.; never was
any one so _misused_ as I am by your devils of printers.

"P.S. I hope and trust the '_not_' was inserted in the first
edition. We must have something--any thing--to set it right. It is
enough to answer for one's own bulls, without other people's."

* * * * *