Chapter XIV: Part 14

It was asserted, and the assertion has been often repeated, that I was instrumental to this unfavourable reception of Sir Samuel Romilly; but this is totally false; none of my friends knew of my being, or of my intending to be, at Bristol on that day. I had gone into the city privately, and had walked up to the Exchange from my inn, the Talbot, without exciting the attention of any one; and, to tell the truth, no man was more sorry than I was, that such a man should have been treated so unfairly as he was by his party; that he should, in the first place, have been so ill advised, as to have had his name coupled with that of Mr. Tierney, and then, that he should be accompanied by the most unpopular and most odious man in the whole city, and one who, since he had been driven from the city, had become a placeman under the Government. These were the sole causes of Sir Samuel Romilly being received with such demonstrations of disgust and disapprobation. To be sure, all the friends of Liberty in the city of Bristol, who had any pretensions to a knowledge of what was going on, must have very clearly seen that Sir Samuel Romilly had been invited to attend, and to become a candidate for Bristol, mainly for the purpose of dividing the popularity with me; and my friends were, doubtless, prepared to scrutinise his speech with rather a sceptical feeling; but not one of my friends would on this account have interrupted him, or have done any thing to prevent him from being heard; on the contrary, there was a general disposition amongst my friends to support him in conjunction with myself.

Those Whigs who supported Sir Samuel Romilly appeared to be thunderstruck at his reception, and for a long time they did not appear to be aware of the cause of it. As there was not one of them who had any influence over the minds of the people, there was no attempt made to rescue Sir Samuel from this very unpleasant situation, and at length he retired from the window sadly disconcerted, and his party were dreadfully chagrined. Sir Samuel had literally been hissed, hooted, and groaned from the window, at a time when I expected every one would have been anxious to hear him, and to listen to him with the greatest attention. I am sure, for myself, that I was greatly disappointed. There might have been ten thousand persons present, which was no very great number for such an occasion;. but I think I may safely say, that there was not one in a hundred that knew or expected that I would be there.

As there was now a pause, and as no one from Sir Samuel Romilly's room attempted to come forward, I mounted upon one of the copper pedestals which stands in the front of the Exchange, and I was instantly hailed with shouts from all those who knew me, which, at that time, could not have been more than half the persons present. My name was rapidly communicated from one to the other, and before I could begin to address them, they gave three cheers for Mr. Hunt, which was proposed by some one present. The moment I began to speak, the most profound silence reigned around; and in a speech of an hour and forty minutes I was interrupted only by the applause of my hearers, and by the anxiety which they expressed that I should put on my hat, as it rained. This inconvenience was soon obviated, by a gentleman being elevated with an umbrella, which he held over my head till I had concluded. During this address I avowed myself the warm advocate for Radical Reform, and declared myself the staunch friend of Sir Francis Burdett, and the principles which he professed. I went through a history of the proceedings of the Whig Administration, and recounted the sinecures, pensions, and unmerited places held by the Grenvilles, and other Boroughmongers of that faction; but when I came to speak of the conduct of the Law Officers of the Crown under that administration, during the continuance of which Sir Samuel Romilly was one of those officers, when I touched on their having drawn up the famous Acts of Parliament passed by the Whig Ministry, during the reign of _one year, one month, one week,_ and _one day;_ when I came to speak of _this_, the windows of the room in which Sir Samuel Romilly and his friends were, in the Bush Tavern, opposite where I stood, were pettishly shut down by some one. The moment that the people saw this, they exclaimed, "Look! look! they are ashamed to hear the truth, and they have shut the windows to prevent its coming amongst them." This shutting the windows the populace took as an insult offered to them, and they vociferously demanded that they should be re-opened; and their demand was made in such an unequivocal and peremptory manner, that the gentry, after some slight hesitation, complied with the wishes of the multitude. I continued to address the people for nearly an hour after this time, although at the outskirts of the crowd in Clarestreet there was a waiter with Sir Samuel Romilly's colours in his hat, who announced that the dinner was waiting; in consequence of which, several attempts were made in vain by some persons in the Bush, to force their way out of that house through the dense crowd, that not only occupied the whole of the front of the tavern, but extended for a very considerable distance above and below, even up to Broad-street and down to Small-street, so that it was absolutely impossible for any one to pass while I was addressing the people. This was most galling to Sir Samuel Romilly's friends, who, from this circumstance, were actually prisoners in the Bush nearly an hour and a half after the dinner had been ready at the Assembly Rooms in King-street, where the party were going to dine; but, if their lives had been at stake not a man of them could have got out till I had finished my speech; for the crowd had considerably increased since I had begun. After having exhausted my strength, I retired amidst the most deafening shouts of approbation; the whole of the immense populace accompanied me to my inn, and left Sir Samuel and his friends a clear course to proceed to their dinner.

I never said any thing against the gown and wig knight. On the contrary, I thought him a much better man for a Member of Parliament than Mr. Protheroe, who had declared himself a candidate also in the Whig interest, to represent the city, in the place of Colonel Baillie, who intended to resign at the general election. I had, ever since the former election, offered myself as a candidate, whenever there should be a vacancy, without any reference to either of the factions; but Mr. Protheroe and Sir Samuel Romilly came forward avowedly to fill the seat of Colonel Baillie; neither of these gentlemen professing any desire to interfere with the White Lion candidate, Mr. Bragge Bathurst, the factions being too civil to each other to interfere with their separate interests. If I had not offered myself as a candidate, Mr. Bragge Bathurst would have been elected by the White Lion interest, without any opposition.

The Whigs were excessively annoyed by the inauspicious manner in which Sir Samuel was greeted, and not less so by the exposure which I made of their politics and principles. The editor of the _Morning Chronicle_, and other papers in London, gave, however, a flaming account of the public entry of Sir Samuel Romilly into Bristol: they said that he was hailed with the greatest enthusiasm, and they published a speech which he had delivered to the people at the Bush Tavern window, and which they unblushingly affirmed to have been received with the greatest applause; but they forgot to say one word about a speech of nearly two hours, which I delivered. They published the account of a speech of a quarter of an hour, not one word of which was heard, while the speech that was heard and attentively listened to, they never noticed at all! This was so glaringly unfair and partial, that Mr. Cobbett wrote a very long and able paper upon the subject, exposing and chastising the Whigs for their duplicity and deception, and, at the same time, he did not fail to represent the conduct of Mr. Perry in its true colours.

A dissolution of Parliament had been anticipated for some time; but an occurrence now took place that caused a sudden and unexpected vacancy for the city of Bristol. Mr. Bragge Bathurst was appointed to the lucrative office of _Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster_, one of the most valuable places in the gift of the Sovereign, or rather of his Ministers. It was announced that he had accepted this office, that he had in consequence vacated his seat, and that a new writ was issued for the election of a Member for the city of Bristol; to which was added, that Mr. Hart Davis, the then Member for Colchester, had accepted the stewardship of the Chiltern Hundreds, for the purpose of becoming a candidate upon the White Lion, or Blue Club, alias the Ministerial interest in Bristol. This was all promulgated in the same paper, and it stated that the election would be held forthwith, as Mr. Davis would be elected without any opposition, the friends of Sir Samuel Romilly and Mr. Protheroe having no intention to interfere with the election of that gentleman.

The writ for electing a Member for Bristol, in the room of Bragge Bathurst, was moved for in the House of Commons, on Tuesday evening, the 24th of June: and at the same time a writ for electing a Member for Colchester, in the room of Richard Hart Davis, was moved for. I never heard a word of this till Thursday afternoon at four o'clock, when the postman brought me my Wednesday's paper, just as I was sitting down to dinner at Rowfant, in Sussex. After dinner I read the account, and I made up my mind to start for that city the next morning. I rode to town on Friday, took my place in the Bath mail, and reached Bath at ten o'clock on Saturday morning. Some of the people of Bristol had arrived in Bath in expectation of meeting me, and one of them immediately returned to Bristol to announce my intention of being in that city the same evening. At the appointed hour, which was five o'clock, I arrived at Totterdown, where I was met by an immense multitude, who took my horses from the carriage, and drew me into the city and through the principal streets, till they arrived at the front of the Exchange, which they had fixed upon as the theatre of my public orations, in consequence of my having accidentally mounted one of the pedestals on the memorable day of Sir Samuel Romilly's public entry into Bristol. I left the carriage, remounted the pedestal, and addressed at least twenty thousand of the inhabitants, who had accompanied me thither with the most deafening shouts. I never had seen such enthusiasm in my life. I briefly animadverted upon the trick which was intended to have been played off upon them by the worthy leaders of both the factions in that city, who had united for the purpose of stealing a march upon the electors, a trick which I had no doubt my opportune arrival would frustrate; and pledged myself to be at the Guildhall in due time on Monday morning, on which day the election was fixed to be held.

Mr. Davis, who was a banker, of Bristol, had made his public entry in the morning of the same day, attended by his friends, amidst very evident marks of disapprobation from the assembled multitude. So sure, however, was this gentleman of his success, and so little had his friends anticipated any opposition, that they had actually got every thing prepared for _chairing_ him, and had ordered the dinner, which was to celebrate the event, to be ready immediately after the election had closed on Monday; as they calculated that the election would be nothing more than a mere matter of form, which would occupy them for only a very few hours. But my arrival, and the enthusiastic reception which I had received, made some of his partizans begin to fear that the victory would not be so easily gained, or the contest so speedily terminated, as they had at first sanguinely hoped. Still the old electioneering managers calculated upon carrying their point by one of their _old tricks_, or by a "_ruse de guerre;_" but in this, as the sequel will shew, they _reckoned without their host_. Before I got into the mail in London, I purchased _Disney's_ Abridgment of Election Law, a part of which I read before it grew dark, and the remainder I finished in the morning before we arrived in Bath. Although this publication is the least to be relied upon of any, yet it furnished me with sufficient law upon the subject, not only to set completely their intended projects at defiance, but also to enable me to keep open the poll for fifteen days, the whole time that the law allows.

The White Lion Club, in the meanwhile, lost no time in preparing to open the campaign on Monday; and, seeing the disposition of the people, and knowing how deservedly unpopular the Ministerial faction, to which Mr. Davis belonged, had rendered themselves, they resolved to carry the election by force. Before Monday morning, they had sworn in upwards of four hundred mock constables, or bludgeon-men, every one of whom was supplied with a short bludgeon, painted sky _blue_, that being the colour of Mr. Davis's party. These bludgeons were composed of ash, and were made of prong staves sawn off in lengths, about two feet long. These were put into the hands of the greatest ruffians that the city of Bristol, and the neighbourhood of Cock-road and Kingswood, could furnish at so short a notice. The few staunch friends who came round me, most of whom were strangers, anticipated nothing less than that the White Lion gentry would carry their point, and, either by trick or by violence, would close the election on the first day. I promised them, however, that if they would only stand steadily by me, I would defeat the object of their enemies, and that they might rely upon an election, and a protracted poll.

Monday came, and at an early hour the bludgeon-men of Mr. Davis had got possession of Broad-street, where the Guildhall is situated; which street, by the bye, has no right to the name that it bears, it being among the narrowest streets in Bristol. I sallied forth from my inn, the Talbot; and having addressed a few words to the multitude upon the Exchange, I proceeded down Broad-street with some of my friends, and reached the Hall door before it was opened. I immediately placed my back against it, and proclaimed to the surrounding throng, that I would be the first to enter that Hall, and that I would be the last that would leave it, while there was a freeman of the city unpolled. Notwithstanding I was now in the midst of the enemy, this declaration was received with a burst of applause, which made the old walls of this _scene of iniquity_ ring again. At length the Sheriffs, _Brice_ and _Bickley_, arrived, attended by all the paraphernalia of office, in company with Mr. Richard Hart Davis, whom I now eyed for the first time. All persons were pompously commanded to stand back from the door; but I had a sturdy set of friends now to support me, and they stood as firm as a rock, and almost as immovable. For some time the Jacks in office attempted in vain to approach the door, till at length I requested that those who were near it would fall back, and make way for the Sheriffs; which request was instantly complied with. The moment the door was open, I was the first man who entered after the Sheriffs, and the rush was tremendous. I was also one of the first that reached the hustings in the Guildhall, and, being once there, I had not the least doubt but I should by and by make a due impression upon the persons there assembled.

During this rush to get into the Guildhall, (a place altogether unfit for the election, and incapable of containing a twentieth part of the electors of Bristol,) Davis's four hundred bludgeon ruffians made a desperate and brutal assault upon the people, and most grossly ill used those who appeared to be my friends and supporters, who were at last driven to a successful resistance. Many of the hired gang were disarmed by the populace, and the rest were either driven from the scene of action, or awed into respectful behaviour by their determined conduct.

Mr. Davis was proposed and seconded by two members of the White Lion Club, who were also members of the Corporation. I was proposed and seconded by two freemen in the humble walks of life, journeymen, I believe, of the names of Pimm and Lydiard; men who, although they did not move in an elevated sphere, yet for native talent and honourable feelings, as far excelled the proposers of Mr. Davis as the sun excels in splendour the twinkling of the smallest star. Both the candidates addressed the crowded assemblage. I avowed myself to be the staunch friend of Radical Reform, and the enemy of oppression, and I tendered an oath to the Mayor, that I would never receive one sixpence of the public money, drawn from the pockets of an impoverished and starving people; and that if elected I would move for the immediate reduction of all extravagant salaries, and the total abolition of all sinecures and unmerited pensions, &c. &c. The Sheriff, little Mister Brice, put it to the vote, in the usual way, by a skew of hands, which of us the freemen would have for their member. The shew of hands was in my favour by an immense majority. Mr. Davis then demanded a poll, and, after a vote or two had been taken for each party, the Sheriffs adjourned the poll till the next morning at nine o'clock. This was of course done to give the unpopular candidate time to collect his forces, and to put in motion the whole machinery of corrupt influence; and, where that failed, the stronger means of unconstitutional dictation and arbitrary power. On our retiring from the hustings, Mr. Davis had to endure every species of popular execration, while I was saluted by the overwhelming applause of the whole multitude, with the exception of the agents of authority and wealth, and the whole of the Corporation and its tools. If the people of Bristol had possessed the privilege of giving their votes by ballot, I believe that I should have had on my side eight out of every ten of the population of the city. It was evidently a contest between the rich and the poor; the whole of the former were openly for Davis, the whole of the latter, with the exception of those who were hired by the other party, were every man, woman, and child, for Hunt; and even of those who were hired, there were numbers who could not conceal their good wishes for me, and their abhorrence of the party for whom they were acting.

In the evening great contests and bloody battles took place in the streets. The bludgeon men of Davis had been increased to eight hundred; each bludgeon being heavy enough to knock down an ox, they being, as I have before stated, six feet prong staves sawn off in three lengths, about two feet each. In the front of the White Lion, in Broadstreet, the bearers of these weapons attacked the populace, whom they beat and bruised most unmercifully for some time; who, in return, at length, beat and drove them to all quarters, and in their fury they demolished the windows of the White Lion Inn, and gutted the house. Bleeding and smarting with their wounds, they then hurried to Clifton, to the house of Mr. Davis, whom they considered as the author of all their wrongs, and of the assaults which had been committed upon them by the hireling ruffians of bludgeon-men, who all wore Davis's colours, and acted under regular disciplined leaders, trained and commanded by the notorious Jemmy Lockley, a boxer and Sheriff's officer. While that party of the populace, which had directed its course to Clifton, demolished the whole of the windows of Mr. Davis's house, and pulled up all the shrubs in his front lawn, another party demolished the doors and windows of the Council House.

When I went to the Hall the next morning, I never witnessed such a scene of devastation as the White Lion exhibited; every window and window frame was destroyed, and there remained only so many holes in the walls. However, as I mean to give a faithful history of this election, I cannot do better than to republish three letters addressed at the time to the Electors of Bristol, by Mr. Cobbett, and also to state the various accounts that were given of these transactions by the _Times_, the _Courier_, and the _Morning Chronicle_ papers. I will begin with the following letter, published in the first page of the 12th volume of _Cobbett's Register_, July 4th, 1812:--

TO THE INDEPENDENT ELECTORS OF BRISTOL.

GENTLEMEN,--Your city, the third in England in point
of population, and for the bravery and public spirit of its
inhabitants the first in the world, is now become, with
all those who take an interest in the public welfare, an
object of anxious attention. You, as the Electors of
Westminster were, have long been the sport of the two
artful factions, who have divided between them the profits
arising from the obtaining of your votes, One of each
faction has always been elected; and as one of them always
belonged to the faction _out of place_, you, whose
intentions and views were honest, consoled yourselves
with the reflection, that if one of your members was in
place, or belonged to the IN party, your other member,
who belonged to the OUT party, was always in the House
to watch him. But now, I think, experience must have
convinced you that the OUT as well as the IN member
was always seeking his own gain at your expense, and
that of the nation, and that the two factions, though
openly hostile to each other, have always been perfectly
well agreed as to the main point, namely, the perpetuating
of those sinecure places and all those other means
by which the public money is put into the pockets of individuals.

With this conviction in your minds, it is not to be wondered
at that you are now beginning to make a stand for
the remnant of your liberties; and, as I am firmly persuaded,
that your success would be of infinite benefit to
the cause of freedom in general, and of course to our
country, now groaning under a compilation of calamities,
I cannot longer withold a public expression of the sentiments
which I entertain respecting the struggle in which
you are engaged; and especially respecting the _election
now going on_, the proceedings of _a recent meeting in
London, and the pretensions of Mr. Hunt_, compared with
those of Sir Samuel Romilly.

As to the first, you will bear in mind, gentlemen, how
often we, who wish for a Reform of the Parliament, have
contended that no Member of the House of Commons
ought to be a placeman or a pensioner. We have said,
and we have shown, that in that Act of Parliament by
virtue of which the present family was exalted to the
throne of this kingdom; we have shown, that by that
Act it was provided that _no man having a pension or place
of emolument under the Crown, should be capable of being
a Member of the House of Commons_. It is indeed true,
that this provision has since been _repealed_; but it having
been enacted, and that too on so important an occasion,
shows clearly how jealous our ancestors were upon the
subject. When we ask for a revival of this law, we are
told that it cannot be wanted, because, if a man be a
placeman or a pensioner _before_ he be chosen at all, those
who choose him know it; and if they like a placeman or
a pensioner, who else has any thing to do with the matter?
And, if a man be made a placeman or pensioner _after_
he be chosen, he must _vacate his seat_, and return to his
constituents to be re-elected before he can sit again; if
they reject him he cannot sit, and if they re-choose him,
who else has any thing to do with the matter?

To be sure it is pretty impudent for these people to talk
to us about _choice_, and about _re-choosing_ and about _rejecting_,
and the like, when they know that we are all
well informed of the nature of choosings and re-choosings
at Old Sarum, at Gatton, at Queenborough, at Bodmin,
at Penryn, at Honiton, at Oakhampton, and at more
than a hundred other places; it is pretty impudent to talk
to us about members _going back to their constituents_ at
such places as those here mentioned; but what will even
the impudence of these people find to say in the case of
those members who, upon having grasped places or pensions,
do go back to their constituents, and upon being
rejected by them, go to some borough where the people
have no voice; or who, not relishing the prospect, do not
go to face their former constituents, but go at once to
some borough, and there take a seat, which, by cogent
arguments, no doubt, some one has been prevailed on to
go out of to make way for them? What will even the
impudence of the most prostituted knaves of hired writers
find to say in cases like these?

Of the former, Mr. GEORGE TIERNEY presents a memorable
instance. He was formerly a member for Southwark,
chosen on account of his professions in favour of
freedom, by a numerous body of independent electors.
But having taken a fancy to a place which put some thousands
a year of the public money into his own individual
pocket, having had the assurance to go back to his constituents,
and having been by them _rejected_ with scorn,
be was immediately _chosen_ by some borough where a seat
bad been emptied in order to receive him, and now he is
representative of the people of a place called _Bandon
Bridge_, in _Ireland_, a place which, in all probability, he
never saw, and the inhabitants of which are, I dare say,
wholly unconscious of having the honour to be represented
by so famous a person. Your late representative,
Mr. BRAGGE BATHURST, has acted a more modest, or at
least a more prudent part. He has got a fat place; a
place, the profits of which would find some hundreds of
Englishmen's families in provisions all the year round;
be has been made what is called _Chancellor of the Duchy
of Lancaster_, which will give him immense patronage,
and of course afford him ample means of enriching his family,
friends, and dependents, besides his having held
places of great salary for many years before. Thus loaded
with riches arising from the public means, he does not, I
perceive, intend to _face you_; he cannot, it seems, screw
himself up to that pitch. We shall in all likelihood see
in a few days what borough opens its chaste arms to receive
him; but, as a matter of much greater consequence,
I now beg to offer you some remarks upon the measures
that have been taken to supply his place.

It was announced to his supporters at Bristol, about
three months ago, that he did not mean to offer himself
for that city again, and Mr. RICHARD HART DAVIS, of
whom you will hear enough, came forward as his successor;
openly avowing all his principles, and expressly
saying, that he would tread in his steps. What those
steps are, you have seen; and what those principles are,
the miserable people of England feel in the effects of war
and taxation. But, I beg your attention to some circumstances
connected with the election, which ought to be
known and long borne in mind. The WRIT for electing
a member for Bristol, in the room of Bragge Bathurst, was
moved for in the House of Commons; on Tuesday evening,
June 23, and at the same moment a writ for electing a
member for Colchester, in the room of Richard Hart Davis,
was moved for. So you see they both vacate at the
same instant; your man not liking to go down to Bristol,
the other vacates a seat for another place, in order to go
down to face you in his stead. Observe too with what
_quickness_ the thing is managed. Nobody knows, or at
least none of you know, that Bragge is going to vacate
his seat. Davis apparently knew it, because we see him
_vacating at the same moment_. The WRIT is sent off the
same night; it gets to Bristol on Wednesday morning the
24th; the law requires _four days notice_ on the part of the
Sheriffs; they give it; and the election comes on the
next Monday. So you see if Mr. HUNT had been living
in Ireland or Scotland, or even in the northern counties
of England, or in some parts of Cornwall, the election
might have been over before there would have been a
POSSIBILITY of his getting to Bristol. And though his
place of residence was within thirty miles of London, he
who was at home on his farm, had but just time to reach
you soon enough to give you an opportunity of exercising
your rights upon this occasion. Mr. Hunt _could_ not know
that the writ was moved for till Wednesday evening,
living, as he does, at a distance from a post town; and,
as it happened, he did not know of it, I believe, till
Thursday night; so that it was next to impossible for
him to come to London (which I suppose was necessary)
and to reach Bristol before Saturday. While, on the other
hand, Mr. Davis had chosen his time, and of course had
made all his preparations.

Such, Gentlemen, have been the means used preparatory
to the election. Let us now see what a scene your
city exhibits at this moment; first, however, taking a
look at the _under-plot going on in London_, in favour of
Sir SAMUEL ROMILLY.

It is stated in the London newspapers, and particularly
in _The Times_ of Saturday last, that there was a meeting
on Friday at the Crown and Anchor in the Strand, the
object of which was "to _raise money_" by subscription
for "_supporting the election of Sir Samuel Romilly at
Bristol;_" and it is added, that a large sum was accordingly
raised. This meeting appears to me to have for
its object the deceiving of the electors of Bristol; an object,
however, which I am satisfied will not be accomplished
to any great extent. I do not mean to say that
Sir Samuel Romilly would use deceit; but I am quite
sure that there are those who would use it upon this
occasion. The truth is, that the raising of these large
sums of money (amounting already, they say, to 8,000_l_.)
proves that Sir Samuel Romilly does not put his trust in
the FREE VOICE of the people of Bristol. At this meeting
Mr. BARING, one of the persons _who makes the loans
to the Government_, was in the chair. This alone is a circumstance
sufficient to enable you to judge not only of the
_character_ of the meeting, but also of what sort of conduct
is _expected_ from Sir Samuel Romilly, if he were placed in
Parliament by the means of this subscription. Mr. WHITBREAD
was also at the meeting, and spoke in favour of
the subscription. But we must not be carried away by
_names_. Mr. Whitbread does many good things; but Mr.
Whitbread is not always right. Mr. Whitbread _subscribed
to bring Mr. Sheridan in for Westminster_, and was, indeed,
the man who caused him to obtain the appearance
of a majority; Mr. Whitbread supported that same Sheridan
afterwards against Lord COCHRANE; and though Mr.
Whitbread is so ready to subscribe now, _he refused to
subscribe to the election of Sir Francis Burdett_, notwithstanding
the election was in a city of which he was an inhabitant
and an elector. These, Gentlemen, are facts, of
which you should be apprised; otherwise _names_ might
deceive you.

I beg to observe also, that at this meeting there was
nothing said about a _Parliamentary Reform_, without
which you must be satisfied no good of any consequence
can be done. There was indeed a Mr. MILLS, who said
he came from Bristol, who observed that "the great majority
of the inhabitants of Bristol _felt_ perfectly convinced
of the necessity of SOMETHING LIKE Reform." And
is this all? Does your conviction go no farther than this?
I remember that, when a little boy, I was crying to my
mother for a bit of bread and cheese, and that a journeyman
carpenter, who was at work hard by, compassionately
offered _to chalk me out a big piece upon a board_. I
forget the way in which I vented my rage against him;
but the offer has never quitted my memory. Yet really
this seems to come up to the notion of Mr. Mills; the carpenter offered me SOMETHING LIKE a big piece of
bread and cheese. Oh! no, Gentlemen, it is not this _something
like_ that you want; you want _the thing itself;_ and
if Sir Samuel Romilly meant that you should have it, do
you believe that neither he, nor any one for him, would
have made any specific promise upon the subject? Even
after Mr. Mills had said that you wanted _something like_
Reform, there was nobody who ventured to say that Sir
Samuel Romilly would endeavour to procure even that
for you. His friends were told, that if he would distinctly
pledge himself to Reform, whether _in place or out of
place_, Mr. Hunt, who only wished to see that measure accomplished,
would himself assist in his election; but
this Sir Samuel Romilly has not done, and therefore he is
not the man whom you ought to choose, though he is beyond
all comparison better than hundreds of other public
men, and though he is, in many respects, a most excellent
Member of Parliament. Gentlemen, these friends of Sir
Samuel Romilly call upon you to choose him, because he
is, they tell you, a decided enemy of the measures of the
present ministers. Now they must very well know, that
_all those measures have had the decided support of the
parliament_. Well, then, do these friends allow, that the
parliament are the real representatives of the people,
and that they speak the people's voice? If Sir Samuel's
friends do allow this, then they do, in fact, say, that he is
an enemy to all those measures which the people's voice
approves of; and, if they do not allow this, if they say
that the parliament do _not_ speak the people's voice, and
are _not_ their real representatives, hove can they hope that
any man will do you any good who is not decidedly for _a
reform of that parliament?_ Let the meeting at the Crown
and Anchor answer these questions, or, in the name of
decency, I conjure them to hold their tongues, and to put
their subscriptions back again into their pockets.

To say the truth (and this is not a time to disguise it
from you) this subscription is a subscription _against_, and
not _for_, the freedom of election. If Sir Samuel Romilly's
friends were willing to put their trust in the free good-will
of the people of Bristol, why raise money in such large
quantities, and especially why resort to _party men_ and to
_loan makers_ for this purpose? They will say, perhaps,
that the money is intended for the purpose of carrying
down the _London voters_, and for that of fetching voters
from elsewhere; but, why are they afraid to put their
trust in the _resident_ voters of Bristol? The object of this
subscription is very far indeed from resembling the object
of that which was set on foot in Westminster, which was
not to gain votes by dint of money, but merely to pay the
expenses of printing, of clerks, and other little matters
inseparable from an election at Westminster; and the
whole of which did not amount to more than about _eight
hundred pounds;_ whereas as many thousands are stated
to be already subscribed for procuring the election of Sir
Samuel Romilly. In short, this attempt of the friends of
Sir Samuel Romilly is like many others that have been
made before. It is _purse against purse_. Mr. PROTHERO
has shaken his purse at Sir Samuel; and, as the latter
does not choose to engage with his own purse, his friends,
with _a loan maker at their head_, came forward to make
up a purse for him; and the free and unbought voice of
the electors of Bristol is evidently intended by neither
party to have any weight at all in the decision.

Let us now return and take a view of the political
picture which Bristol at this moment presents. And
here, the first observation that strikes one is, that neither
the friends of Sir Samuel Romilly nor the friends of Mr.
Prothero say one word in opposition to Mr. Hart Davis,
though he avowedly stands upon the principles of Mr.
Bragge and the present Ministers; though he quitted his
canvass about ten weeks ago, to come express to London
to vote in favour of the Orders in Council; and though
he now says, that he will tread in the steps of Mr. Bragge.
Though they have all this before their eyes, not one single
syllable does any one of them utter against the pretensions
or movements of Mr. Davis; and, though the meeting
at the Crown and Anchor took place several days
after the Bristol and Colchester writs were moved for,
and though the parties at the meeting must necessarily
have been well acquainted with all that I have above
stated to you upon the subject of those writs, not one
word did they utter against the pretensions of Mr. Davis,
nor did they (according to the printed report of their
proceedings) even mention his name, or take the smallest
notice of the circumstance, that an election, a little, snug,
rotten-borough-like election, was, at that moment, getting
up in that very city, for the _interest_ and _honour_ of which
they were affecting so much concern! And can you, then,
believe them sincere? Can you believe, that they have
any other view than merely that of securing _a seat for
the party_ in Bristol? Can you doubt that the contest, on
their part, is not for the _principle_, but for the _seat?_

Having pointed out this circumstance to your attention,
it is hardly necessary for me to advert to the conduct of
Mr. Hunt, which, in this case in particular, forms a contrast
with that of the other parties too striking not to
have produced a lasting impression upon your minds. He
does not content himself with _talking_ about defending
your liberties. He _acts_ as well as _talks_. He hears that
the enemy is at your camp, and he flies to rescue you
from his grasp. He does not waste his time in a tavern in
London, drawing up flourishing resolutions about "_public
spirit_." He hastens among you; he _looks your and
his adversary in the face:_ he shows you that you may
_depend upon him in the hour of trial_. These, Gentlemen,
are marks of such a character in a representative as
the times demand. Sir Samuel Romilly is a very worthy
gentleman; an honest man; a humane man; a man that
could not, in my opinion, be by any means tempted to do
a cruel or dishonest act; and he is, too, a man of great
talents. But, I have no scruple to say, that I should prefer,
and greatly prefer, Mr. Hunt to Sir Samuel Romilly,
as a Member of Parliament; for, while I do not know,
and do not believe, that the latter excels the former in
honesty or humanity, I am convinced that his talents,
though superior, perhaps, _in their kind_, are not equal, _in
value to the public_, to the talents possessed by Mr. Hunt,
who is at this moment giving you a specimen of the effect
of those talents.

Gentlemen, the predominance of _Lawyers_, in this country,
has produced amongst us a very erroneous way of
thinking with respect to the talents of public men; and,
contrary to the notions of the world in general, we are
apt to think a man great in mind in proportion to the glibness
of his tongue. With us, to be a _great talker_ is to be
a _great man;_ but perhaps a falser rule of judging never
was adopted. It is so far from being true as a general
maxim, that it is generally the contrary of the truth; and,
if you look back through the list of our own public men,
you will find that, in general, they have been shallow
and mischievous in proportion to their gift of talking. We
have been brought to our present miserable state by a
lawyer-like policy, defended in lawyer-like debates.
Plain good sense has been brow-beaten out of countenance;
has been talked down, by the politicians from the
bar; haranguing and special pleading and quibbling have
usurped the place of frank and explicit statement and unsophisticated
reasoning. In Mr. Hunt you have no lawyer,
but you have a man who is not to be brow-beaten
into silence. You have a man not to be intimidated by
the frowns or the threats of wealth or of rank; a man
not to be induced to abandon his duty towards you from
any consideration of danger to himself; and, I venture to
foretell (begging that my words may be remembered)
that, if you elect him, the whole country will soon acknowledge
the benefit conferred on it by the city of Bristol.

Gentlemen, this letter will, in all likelihood, find you
engaged in the bustle of an election. With all the advantages
on the side of your adversary, you may not, perhaps,
upon the _present_ occasion, be able to defeat him.
But you will have a chance; you will have an opportunity
of trying; you will have _an election_; and this you
would not have had if it had not been for Mr. Hunt,
for the whole affair would have been over before you had
scarcely _heard_ of it. At the very least you will have
_some days of liberty to speak your minds_; to tell Mr.
Davis what you think of him and of his predecessor; to
declare aloud your grievances and your indignation; and
even for _this_ liberty you will be indebted to Mr. Hunt,
and _solely_ to Mr. Hunt. You are told of the _zeal_ of Mr.
Prothero and Sir Samuel Romilly in your service; you are
told of their desire to promote your _interest_ and your _honour_;
but where are they _now_? Where are they when
the enemy is in your city, when you were to have been
handed over from Mr. Bragge Bathurst to Hart Davis as
quietly as if you had been a cargo of tallow or of corn?
It is now, it is in this moment of real need, that Mr. Hunt
comes to your aid; and, if he fail in defeating, he will,
at the least, harass your enemy, make his victory over
you cost him dear, and by exposing the sources and
means of his success, lay the foundation of his future defeat
and disgrace.--I am, your friend,

WM. COBBETT.

_State Prison, Nerogate, Monday, 29th June_, 1812.

Such of my readers as are not old enough to remember the events, or to have read Mr. Cobbett's Register at that time, will acquire from this letter a pretty cleat insight into the state of the case at this period of the proceedings. It has already been seen, that, on the first morning, I made my way to the hustings, and, under every disadvantage, maintained the right of election in the City of Bristol. I had no allies but the people; of _them_, indeed, I had the great mass with me; but, though I had well-wishers in all the richer classes, there was scarcely a single man beyond the rank of a journeyman, who had the courage openly to give me any countenance or support. The Whigs and Tories united with all their accumulated force against me. I had, therefore, to contend, single-handed, against all _the power, wealth and influence_ of all parties and factions in the city. All the corporation, all the merchants, all the tradesmen, all the clergy and priests, whether of the church of England or of the numberless sects of dissenters, all these, and all whom they could array under their banners, were volunteers to uphold the most corrupt and profligate system of election that ever disgraced the rottenest of rotten boroughs. Then came the hireling legion, consisting of a swarm of more foul and noxious vermin than Moses inflicted upon the land of Egypt. It was made up of all the attorneys, and pettifoggers, with their clerks, scamps, and runners; every man, or rather every reptile, of them, being profusely fed to bark, to snarl, to cavil, and to bully; and all of them more ravenous and ferocious than sharks or wolves. It is, indeed, almost a libel upon the sharks and wolves to compare them with such creatures. I cannot, perhaps, give a better idea of them than in the forcible, though rather coarse language of a mechanic, who declared that, "if hell were raked with a small tooth-comb, it would not be possible to collect another such a gang." In the evening, I requested my Committee to procure me a list of these worthy limbs of the law; and, if I recollect right, the number was forty-one. I know that it was one under or one over forty, but I do not know which. There they were, Whigs and Tories, bitter haters of each other on all other occasions, but now jumbled together like pigs in a stye, or like hungry curs of all sorts of mis-begotten and degenerate breeds. I believe that the famous Mr. WEBB HALL, who was then a practising attorney in Bristol (of the firm of Jarman and Hall); I believe that this profound agricultural quack of 1821, was, in 1812, one of the formidable phalanx which was drawn up against me.

O, how this blessed band did roar and bluster, and pretend to be shocked and horrified at my "matchless impudence," in thinking to oppose "the amiable" and mighty candidate of the White Lion Club! The reader will bear in mind that there never had been a real contested election in Bristol since that of 1774, when Mr. Burke and Mr. Cruger were elected, upon the opposition or Whig interest, to the exclusion of Earl Nugent and Mr. Brickdale. At the election in 1780, the ministerial faction returned both members. "From that period till 1812," says Mr. Oldfield, in his History of the Boroughs, "the city of Bristol has been governed by two party clubs, and each club has nominated a member, who were quietly returned without any opposition." The people of Bristol, I found, distinguished their two factions by the designation of the _high_ and the _low_ party: the Whigs deriving their principal support from the lower class of tradesmen and journeymen.

The hungry, grasping, quirking attorneys thought they were all the time pretending to be shocked at my opposition to "the worthy Mr. Davis," were, in fact, frightened out of their senses, every moment of the first day, lest I should make a slip, so as to enable their worthy _leader_, Mr. Arthur Palmer, the perpetual Under Sheriff, to take an advantage of it and close the election. These mercenaries were all _hired at five guineas a day_ each, as long as the election lasted; and of course the cunning old trickster, Palmer, was always upon the look out to spoil their sport, by closing the election. This Squire Palmer, this perpetual tormentor of the poor distressed debtors of the City, was a cavilling, quibbling, empty-headed, testy, old womanish chap, scarcely worthy to be designated by the title of a man. He was eternally yelping, like a cur, without any rhyme or reason; and the reader may estimate the pack by the description that I have given of this, the foremost hound. There was another of this gang who put himself very forward, and who was very insolent to some of my friends. Such a looking creature I had scarcely ever seen in human form; he had coal-black, straight hair, hanging down a sallow-looking face, that had met with very rough usage from the ravages of the small-pox. In fact, his face resembled a piece of cold, dirty, honey combed tripe, and had very little more expression in it; and the whole was completed by two heavy, dark eyes, which looked like leaden bullets stuck in clay. This worthy had been going on for some time in an impertinent way, on which I was about to admonish him; and, as a preliminary, I asked him, with great coolness, "pray, Sir, is not your naive Leach?" "Yes," said he, "it is _Leech_, and I should like to suck thy blood!" This was esteemed a brilliant sally of wit, and was received with noisy approbation by his surrounding friends. Well! I thought to myself, I am amongst a precious set of cannibals, indeed, and it will require all my temper to manage with such a tribe. There, too, sat the Sheriffs. The one of them, Mr. Sheriff Brice, a sugar-baker, was as upstart, whipper-snapper, waspish a little gentleman as ever disgraced the seat of office. I soon discovered that I was not to expect from him an atom of liberality or fair play. Mr. Sheriff Benjamin Bickley, the other Sheriff, appeared to be an easy, good sort of man, that wished to take it all very coolly and unconcernedly--to wit, "you may settle it just as you please, gentlemen," or some such answer as that, when he was appealed to. However, there was, altogether, a spirit of fairness about him, which, when it came to the push, he had too much honesty to disguise; so that, when he could be moved to interfere, it was generally with impartiality. These were our two Sheriffs and returning officers. But, as they thought it quite beneath them to understand any thing about the law of election, they had their assessor, a barrister, to settle all the law points with me; this assessor was Edmond Griffith, Esq. who is now one of the police magistrates in the metropolis, but at which office I forget. The points of law I carried nineteen times out of twenty, for I had _Disney's Abridgement_ at my fingers ends, and that author's volume we made the umpire in all contested points. Before I proceed any farther, I must say, that, during the whole of this tremendous contest, Mr. Griffith conducted himself in every respect like a gentleman and a man of honour; and when I have said this of Mr. Chancellor Griffith, and Mr. Sheriff Bickley, I shall not belie any person in the city of Bristol by paying him a similar compliment. With these two exceptions, I can safely affirm, that I never received an act of civility, liberality or fair play, from any of that class that call themselves gentlemen, in Bristol, during the whole fifteen days that the election lasted. But, to make amends for this, I received numerous acts of kindness from many worthy tradesmen, and such proofs of devoted attachment from almost the whole of the population, male and female, with the exception of the hirelings and dependents of the gentry, as I have never seen surpassed to this day.