Chapter VII: Preface (6)

It would be somewhat too long a work for this place _Zetetically_ to examine, and positively to prove, what particular kind of motion it is that must be the efficient of Light; for though it be a motion, yet ’tis not every motion that produces it, since we find there are many bodies very violently mov’d, which yet afford not such an effect; and there are other bodies, which to our other senses, seem not mov’d so much, which yet shine. Thus Water and quick-silver, and most other liquors heated, shine not; and several hard bodies, as Iron, Silver, Brass, Copper, Wood, &c. though very often struck with a hammer, shine not presently, though they will all of them grow exceeding hot; whereas rotten Wood, rotten Fish, Sea-water, Gloworms, &c. have nothing of tangible heat in them, and yet (where there is no stronger light to affect the Sensory) they shine some of them so Vividly, that one may make a shift to read by them.

It would be too long, I say, here to insert the discursive progress by which I inquir’d after the proprieties of the motion of Light, and therefore I shall only add the result.

And, First, I found it ought to be exceeding _quick_, such as those motions of _fermentation_ and _putrefaction_, whereby, certainly, the parts are exceeding nimbly and violently mov’d; and that, because we find those motions are able more minutely to shatter and divide the body, then the most violent heats or _menstruums_ we yet know. And that fire is nothing else but such a _dissolution_ of the Burning body, made by the most _universal menstruum_ of all _sulphureous bodies_, namely, the Air, we shall in an other place of this Tractate endeavour to make probable. And that, in all extreamly hot shining bodies, there is a very quick motion that causes Light, as well as a more robust that causes Heat, may be argued from the celerity wherewith the bodyes are dissolv’d.

Next, it must be a _Vibrative motion_. And for this the newly mention’d _Diamond_ affords us a good argument; since if the motion of the parts did not return, the Diamond must after many rubbings decay and be wasted: but we have no reason to suspect the latter, especially if we consider the exceeding difficulty that is found in cutting or wearing away a Diamond. And a Circular motion of the parts is much more improbable, since, if that were granted, and they be suppos’d irregular and Angular parts, I see not how the parts of the Diamond should hold so firmly together, or remain in the same sensible dimensions, which yet they do. Next, if they be _Globular_, and mov’d only with a _turbinated_ motion, I know not any cause that can impress that motion upon the _pellucid medium_, which yet is done. Thirdly, any other _irregular_ motion of the parts one amongst another, must necessarily make the body of a fluid consistence, from which it is far enough. It must therefore be a _Vibrating_ motion.

And Thirdly, That it is a very _short-vibrating motion_, I think the instances drawn from the shining of Diamonds will also make probable. For a Diamond being the hardest body we yet know in the World, and consequently the least apt to yield or bend, must consequently also have its _vibrations_ exceeding short.

And these, I think, are the three principal proprieties of a motion, requisite to produce the effect call’d Light in the Object.

The next thing we are to consider, is the way or manner of the _trajection_ of this motion through the interpos’d pellucid body to the eye: And here it will be easily granted,

First, That it must be a body _susceptible_ and _impartible_ of this motion that will deserve the name of a Transparent. And next, that the parts of such a body must be _Homogeneous_, or of the same kind. Thirdly, that the constitution and motion of the parts must be such, that the appulse of the luminous body may be communicated or propagated through it to the greatest imaginable distance in the least imaginable time, though I see no reason to affirm, that it must be in an instant: For I know not any one Experiment or observation that does prove it. And, whereas it may be objected, That we see the Sun risen at the very instant when it is above the sensible Horizon, and that we see a Star hidden by the body of the Moon at the same instant, when the Star, the Moon, and our Eye are all in the same line; and the like Observations, or rather suppositions, may be urg’d. I have this to answer, That I can as easily deny as they affirm; for I would fain know by what means any one can be assured any more of the Affirmative, then I of the Negative. If indeed the propagation were very slow, ’tis possible something might be discovered by Eclypses of the Moon; but though we should grant the progress of the light from the Earth to the Moon, and from the Moon back to the Earth again to be full two Minutes in performing, I know not any possible means to discover it; nay, there may be some instances perhaps of Horizontal Eclypses that may seem very much to favour this supposition of the slower progression of Light then most imagine. And the like may be said of the Eclypses of the Sun, &c. But of this only by the by. Fourthly, That the motion is propagated every way through an _Homogeneous medium_ by _direct_ or _straight_ lines extended every way like Rays from the center of a Sphere. Fifthly, in an _Homogeneous medium_ this motion is propagated every way with _equal velocity_, whence necessarily every _pulse_ or _vibration_ of the luminous body will generate a Sphere, which will continually increase, and grow bigger, just after the same manner (though indefinitely swifter) as the waves or rings on the surface of the water do swell into bigger and bigger circles about a point of it, where, by the sinking of a Stone the motion was begun, whence it necessarily follows, that all the parts of these Spheres undulated through an _Homogeneous medium_ cut the Rays at right angles.

But because all transparent _mediums_ are not _Homogeneous_ to one another, therefore we will next examine how this pulse or motion will be propagated through differingly transparent _mediums_. And here, according to the most acute and excellent Philosopher _Des Cartes_, I suppose the sign of the angle of inclination in the first _medium_ to be to the sign of refraction in the second, As the density of the first, to the density of the second. By density, I mean not the density in respect of gravity (with which the refractions or transparency of _mediums_ hold no proportion) but in respect onely to the _trajection_ of the Rays of light, in which respect they only differ in this; that the one propagates the pulse more easily and weakly, the other more slowly, but more strongly. But as for the pulses themselves, they will by the refraction acquire another propriety, which we shall now endeavour to explicate.

We will suppose therefore in the first Figure ACFD to be a physical Ray, or ABC and DEF to be two Mathematical Rays, _trajected_ from a very remote point of a luminous body through an _Homogeneous_ transparent _medium_ LLL, and DA, EB, FC, to be small portions of the orbicular impulses which must therefore cut the Rays at right angles; these Rays meeting with the plain surface NO of a _medium_ that yields an easier _transitus_ to the propagation of light, and falling _obliquely_ on it, they will in the _medium_ MMM be refracted towards the perpendicular of the surface. And because this _medium_ is more easily _trajected_ then the former by a third, therefore the point C of the orbicular pulse FC will be mov’d to H four spaces in the same time that F the other end of it is mov’d to G three spaces, therefore the whole refracted pulse GH shall be _oblique_ to the refracted Rays CHK and GI; and the angle GHC shall be an acute, and so much the more acute by how much the greater the refraction be, then which nothing is more evident, for the sign of the inclination is to the sign of refraction as GF to TC the distance between the point C and the perpendicular from G on CK, which being as four to three, HC being longer then GF is longer also then TC, therefore the angle GHC is less than GTC. So that henceforth the parts of the pulses GH and IK are mov’d ascew, or cut the Rays at _oblique_ angles.

It is not my business in this place to set down the reasons why this or that body should impede the Rays more, others less: as why Water should transmit the Rays more easily, though more weakly than air. Onely thus much in general I shall hint, that I suppose the _medium_ MMM to have less of the transparent undulating subtile matter, and that matter to be less implicated by it, whereas LLL I suppose to contain a greater quantity of the fluid undulating substance, and this to be more implicated with the particles of that _medium_.

But to proceed, the same kind of _obliquity_ of the Pulses and Rays will happen also when the refraction is made out of a more easie into a more difficult _mediu_; as by the calculations of GQ & CSR which are refracted from the perpendicular. In both which calculations ’tis _obvious_ to observe, that always that part of the Ray towards which the refraction is made has the end of the _orbicular pulse_ precedent to that of the other side. And always, the oftner the refraction is made the same way, Or the greater the single refraction is, the more is this unequal progress. So that having found this odd propriety to be an inseparable concomitant of a refracted Ray, not streightned by a contrary refraction, we will next examine the refractions of the Sun-beams, as they are suffer’d onely to pass through a small passage, _obliquely_ out of a more difficult, into a more easie _medium_.

Let us suppose therefore ABC in the second Figure to represent a large _Chemical Glass-body_ about two foot long, filled with very fair Water as high as AB, and inclin’d in a convenient posture with B towards the Sun: Let us further suppose the top of it to be cover’d with an _opacous_ body, all but the hole ab, through which the Sun-beams are suffer’d to pass into the Water, and are thereby refracted to cdef, against which part, if a Paper be expanded on the outside, there will appear all the colours of the Rainbow, that is, there will be generated the two principal colours, _Scarlet_ and _Blue_, and all the _intermediate_ ones which arise from the composition and dilutings of these two, that is, cd shall exhibit a _Scarlet_, which toward d is diluted into a _Yellow_; this is the refraction of the Ray, ik, which comes from the underside of the Sun; and the Ray ef shall appear of a deep _Blue_, which is gradually towards e diluted into a pale _Watchet-blue_. Between d and e the two _diluted_ colours. _Blue_ and _Yellow_ are mixt and compounded into a _Green_; and this I imagine to be the reason why _Green_ is so acceptable a colour to the eye, and that either of the two extremes are, if intense, rather a little offensive, namely, the being plac’d in the middle between the two extremes, and compounded out of both those, _diluted_ also, or somewhat qualifi’d, for the _composition_, arising from the mixture of the two extremes _undiluted_, makes a _Purple_, which though it be a lovely colour, and pretty acceptable to the eye, yet is it nothing comparable to the ravishing pleasure with which a curious and well tempered _Green_ affects the eye. If removing the Paper, the eye be plac’d against cd, it will perceive the lower side of the Sun (or a Candle at night which is much better, because it offends not the eye, and is more easily manageable) to be of a deep _Red_, and if against ef it will perceive the upper part of the luminous body to be of a deep _Blue_; and these colours will appear deeper and deeper, according as the Rays from the luminous body fall more _obliquely_ on the surface of the Water, and thereby suffer a greater refraction, and the more distinct, the further cdef is removed from the trajecting hole.

So that upon the whole, we shall find that the reason of the _Phænomena_ seems to depend upon the _obliquity_ of the _orbicular pulse_, to the Lines of Radiation, and in particular, that the Ray cd which constitutes the _Scarlet_ has its inner parts, namely those which are next to the middle of the luminous body, precedent to the outermost which are contiguous to the dark and _unradiating_ skie. And that the Ray ef which gives a _Blue_, has its outward part, namely, that which is contiguous to the dark skie precedent to the pulse from the innermost, which borders on the bright _area_ of the luminous body.

We may observe further, that the cause of the _diluting_ of the colours towards the middle, proceeds partly from the wideness of the hole through which the Rays pass, whereby the Rays from several parts of the luminous body, fall upon many of the same parts between c and f as is more manifest by the Figure: And partly also from the nature of the refraction it self, for the vividness or strength of the two terminating colours, arising chiefly as we have seen, from the very great difference that is betwixt the outsides of those _oblique undulations_ & the dark Rays circumambient, and that disparity betwixt the _approximate_ Rays, decaying gradually: the further inward toward the middle of the luminous body they are remov’d, the more must the colour approach to a white or an undisturbed light.

Upon the calculation of the refraction and reflection from a Ball of Water or Glass, we have much the same _Phænomena_, namely, an _obliquity_ of the undulation in the same manner as we have found it here. Which, because it is very much to our present purpose, and affords such an _Instancia crucis_, as no one that I know has hitherto taken notice of, I shall further examine. For it does very plainly and positively distinguish, and shew, which of the two _Hypotheses_, either the _Cartesian_ or this is to be followed, by affording a generation of all the colors in the Rainbow, where according to the _Cartesian Principles_ there should be none at all generated. And secondly, by affording an instance that does more closely confine the cause of these _Phænomena_ of colours to this present _Hypothesis_.

And first, for the _Cartesian_, we have this to object against it, That whereas he says (_Meteorum Cap. 8. Sect. 5._) _Sed judicabam unicam (refractione scilicet) ad minimum requiri, & quidem talem ut ejus effectus aliâ contrariâ (refractione) non destruatur: Nam experientia docet si superficies _NM_ & _NP_ (nempe refringentes) Parallelæ forent, radios tantundem per alteram iterum erectos quantum per unam frangerentur, nullos colores depicturos_; This Principle of his holds true indeed in a prisme where the refracting surfaces are plain, but is contradicted by the Ball or Cylinder, whether of Water or Glass, where the refracting surfaces are Orbicular or Cylindrical. For if we examine the passage of any _Globule_ or Ray of the primary _Iris_, we shall find it to pass out of the Ball or Cylinder again, with the same inclination and refraction that it enter’d in withall, and that that last refraction by means of the _intermediate_ reflection shall be the same as if without any reflection at all the Ray had been twice refracted by two Parallel surfaces.

And that this is true, not onely in one, but in every Ray that goes to the constitution of the Primary Iris; nay, in every Ray, that suffers only two refractions, and one reflection, by the surface of the round body, we shall presently see most evident, if we repeat the _Cartesian Scheme_, mentioned in the tenth _Section_ of the eighth _Chapter_ of his _Meteors_, where EFKNP in the third Figure[9] is one of the Rays of the Primary Iris, twice refracted at F and N, and once reflected at K by the surface of the Water-ball. For, first it is evident, that KF and KN are equal, because KN being the reflected part of KF they have both the same inclination on the surface K that is the angles FKT, and NKV made by the two Rays and the Tangent of K are equal, which is evident by the Laws of reflection; whence it will follow also, that KN has the same inclination on the surface N, or the Tangent of it XN that the Ray KF has to the surface F, or the Tangent of it FY, whence it must necessarily follow, that the refractions at F and N are equal, that is, KFE and KNP are equal. Now, that the surface N is by the reflection at K made parallel to the surface at F, is evident from the principles of reflection; for reflection being nothing but an inverting of the Rays, if we re-invert the Ray KNP, and make the same inclinations below the line TKV that it has above, it will be most evident, that KH the inverse of KN will be the continuation of the line FK, and that LHI the inverse of OX is parallel to FY. And HM the inverse of NP is Parallel to EF for the angle KHI is equal to KNO which is equal to KFY, and the angle KHM is equal to KNP which is equal to KFE which was to be prov’d.

So that according to the above mentioned _Cartesian_ principles there should be generated no colour at all in a Ball of Water or Glass by two refractions and one reflection, which does hold most true indeed, if the surfaces be plain, as may be experimented with any kind of prisme where the two refracting surfaces are equally inclin’d to the reflecting; but in this the _Phænomena_ are quite otherwise.

The cause therefore of the generation of colour must not be what _Des Cartes_ assigns, namely, a certain _rotation_ of the _Globuli ætherei_, which are the particles which he supposes to constitute the _Pellucid medium_, But somewhat else, perhaps what we have lately supposed, and shall by and by further prosecute and explain.

But, First I shall crave leave to propound some other difficulties of his, notwithstanding exceedingly ingenious _Hypothesis_, which I plainly confess to me seem such; and those are,

First, if that light be (as is affirmed, _Diopt._ cap. 1. §. 8.) not so properly a motion, as an action or propension to motion, I cannot conceive how the eye can come to be sensible of the _verticity_ of a _Globule_, which is generated in a drop of Rain, perhaps a mile off from it. For that _Globule_ is not carry’d to the eye according to his formerly recited Principle; and if not so, I cannot conceive how it can communicate its _rotation_, or circular motion to the line of the _Globules_ between the drop and the eye. It cannot be by means of every ones turning the next before him; for if so, then onely all the _Globules_ that are in the odd places must be turned the same way with the first, namely, the 3. 5. 7. 9. 11, &c. but all the _Globules_ interposited between them in the even places; namely, the 2. 4. 6. 8. 10. &c. must be the quite contrary, whence, according to the _Cartesian Hypothesis_, there must be no distinct colour generated, but a confusion. Next, since the _Cartesian Globuli_ are suppos’d (_Principiorum Philosoph._ Part. 3. §. 86.) to be each of them continually in motion about their centers, I cannot conceive how the eye is able to distinguish this new generated motion from their former inherent one, if I may so call that other wherewith they are mov’d or _turbinated_, from some other cause than refraction. And thirdly, I cannot conceive how these motions should not happen sometimes to oppose each other, and then, in stead of a _rotation_, there would be nothing but a direct motion generated, and consequently no colour. And fourthly, I cannot conceive, how by the _Cartesian Hypothesis_ it is possible to give any plausible reason of the nature of the Colours generated in the thin _laminæ_ of these our _Microscopical Observations_; for in many of these, the refracting and reflecting surfaces are parallel to each other, and consequently no _rotation_ can be generated, nor is there any necessity of a shadow or termination of the bright Rays, such as is suppos’d (_Chap._ 8. §. 5. _Et præterea observavi umbram quoque, aut limitationem luminis requiri:_ and _Chap._ 8. §. 9.) to be necessary to the generation of any distinct colours; Besides that, here is oftentimes one colour generated without any of the other appendant ones, which cannot be by the _Cartesian Hypothesis_.

There must be therefore some other propriety of refraction that causes colour. And upon the examination of the thing, I cannot conceive any one more general, inseparable, and sufficient, than that which I have before assign’d. That we may therefore see how exactly our _Hypothesis_ agrees also with the _Phænomena_ of the refracting round body, whether _Globe_ or _Cylinder_, we shall next subjoyn our _Calculation_ or _Examen_ of it.

And to this end, we will calculate any two Rays: as for instance;[10] let EF be a Ray cutting the _Radius_ CD (divided into 20. parts) in G 16. parts distant from C, and ef another Ray, which cuts the same _Radius_ in g 17. parts distant, these will be refracted to K and k, and from thence reflected to N and n, and from thence refracted toward P and p; therefore the Arch Ff will be 5.d 5′. The Arch FK 106.d 30′. the Arch fk 101.d 2′. The line FG 6000. and fg 5267. therefore hf. 733. therefore Fc 980, almost. The line FK 16024. and fk 15436. therefore Nd 196. and no 147 almost, the line Nn 1019 the Arch Nn 5.d 51′. therefore the Angle Nno is 34.d 43′. therefore the Angle Non is 139.d 56′. which is almost 50.d more than a right Angle.

It is evident therefore by this _Hypothesis_, that at the same time that ef touches f. EF is arrived at c. And by that time efkn is got to n, EFKN is got to d and when it touches N, the pulse of the other Ray is got to o. and no farther, which is very short of the place it should have arriv’d to, to make the Ray np to cut the _orbicular pulse_ No at right Angles: therefore the Angle Nop is an acute Angle, but the quite contrary of this will happen, if 17. and 18. be calculated in stead of 16. and 17. both which does most exactly agree with the _Phænomena_: For if the Sun, or a Candle (which is better) be placed about Ee, and the eye about Pp, the Rays EFef at 16. and 17. will paint the side of the luminous object toward np _Blue_, and towards NP _Red_. But the quite contrary will happen when EF is 17. and ef 18. for then towards NP shall be a _Blue_, and towards np a _Red_, exactly according to the calculation. And there appears the _Blue_ of the Rainbow, where the two _Blue_ sides of the two Images unite, and there the _Red_ where the two _Red_ sides unite, that is, where the two Images are just disappearing; which is, when the Rays EF and NP produc’d till they meet, make an Angle of about 41. and an half; the like union is there of the two Images in the Production of the _Secundary Iris_, and the same causes, as upon calculation may appear; onely with this difference, that it is somewhat more faint, by reason of the duplicate reflection, which does always weaken the impulse the oftner it is repeated.

Now, though the second refraction made at Nn be convenient, that is, do make the Rays glance the more, yet is it not altogether requisite; for it is plain from the calculation, that the pulse dn is sufficiently _oblique_ to the Rays KN and kn, as wel as the pulse fc is _oblique_ to the Rays FK & fk. And therefore if a piece of very fine Paper be held close against Nn and the eye look on it either through the Ball as from D, or from the other side, as from B. there shall appear a Rainbow, or colour’d line painted on it with the part toward X appearing _Red_, towards O, _Blue_; the same also shall happen, if the Paper be placed about Kk, for towards T shall appear a _Red_, and towards V a _Blue_, which does exactly agree with this my _Hypothesis_, as upon the calculation of the progress of the pulse will most easily appear.

Nor do these two observations of the colours appearing to the eye about p differing from what they appear on the Paper at N contradict each other; but rather confirm and exactly agree with one another, as will be evident to him that examines the reasons set down by the ingenious. _Des Cartes_ in the 12. _Sect._ of the 8. _Chapter of his Meteors_, where he gives the true reason why the colours appear of a quite contrary order to the eye, to what they appear’d on the Paper if the eye be plac’d in steed of the Paper: And as in the Prisme, so also in the Water-drop, or Globe the _Phænomena_, and reason are much the same.

Having therefore shewn that there is such a propriety in the _prisme_ and water _Globule_ whereby the pulse is made _oblique_ to the progressive, and that so much the more, by how much greater the refraction is, I shall in the next place consider, how this conduces to the production of colours, and what kind of impression it makes upon the bottom of the eye; and to this end it will be requisite to examine this _Hypothesis_ a little more particularly.

First therefore, if we consider the manner of the progress of the pulse, it will seem rational to conclude, that that part or end of the pulse which precedes the other, must necessarily be somwhat more _obtunded_, or _impeded_ by the resistance of the transparent _medium_, than the other part or end of it which is subsequent, whose way is, as it were, prepared by the other; especially if the adjacent _medium_ be not in the same manner enlightned or agitated. And therefore (in the fourth _Figure_ of the sixth _Iconism_) the Ray AAAHB will have its side HH more deadened by the resistance of the dark or quiet _medium_ PPP, Whence there will be a kind of deadness superinduc’d on the side HHH, which will continually increase from B, and strike deeper and deeper into the Ray by the line BR; Whence all the parts of the triangle, RBHO will be of a dead _Blue_ colour, and so much the deeper, by how much the nearer they lie to the line BHH, which is most deaded or impeded, and so much the more _dilute_, by how much the nearer it approaches the line BR. Next on the other side of the Ray AAN, the end A of the pulse AH will be promoted, or made stronger, having its passage already prepar’d as ’twere by the other parts preceding, and so its impression wil be stronger; And because of its _obliquity_ to the Ray, there will be propagated a kind of faint motion into QQ the adjacent dark or quiet _medium_, which faint motion will spread further and further into QQ as the Ray is propagated further and further from A, namely, as far as the line MA, whence all the triangle MAN will be ting’d with a _Red_, and that _Red_ will be the deeper the nearer it approaches the line MA, and the _paler_ or _yellower_ the nearer it is the line NA. And if the Ray be continued, so that the lines AN and BR (which are the bounds of the _Red_ and _Blue diluted_) do meet and cross each other, there will be beyond that intersection generated all kinds of _Greens_.

Now, these being the proprieties of every single refracted Ray of light, it will be easie enough to consider what must be the result of very many such Rays collateral: As if we suppose infinite such Rays _interjacent_ between AKSB and ANOB, which are the terminating: For in this case the Ray AKSB will have its _Red_ triangle intire, as lying next to the dark or quiet _medium_, but the other side of it BS will have no _Blue_, because the _medium adjacent_ to it SBO, is mov’d or enlightned, and consequently that light does destroy the colour. So likewise will the Ray ANOB lose its _Red_, because the _adjacent medium_ is mov’d or enlightned, but the other side of the Ray that is _adjacent_ to the dark, namely, AHO will preserve its _Blue_ entire, and these Rays must be so far produc’d as till AN and BR cut each other, before there will be any _Green_ produc’d. From these Proprieties well consider’d, may be deduc’d the reasons of all the _Phænomena_ of the _prisme_, and of the _Globules_ or drops of Water which conduce to the production of the Rainbow.

Next for the impression they make on the _Retina_, we will further examine this _Hypothesis_: Suppose therefore ABCDEF, in the fifth _Figure_, to represent the Ball of the eye: on the _Cornea_ of which ABC two Rays GACH and KCAI (which are the terminating Rays of a luminous body) falling, are by the refraction thereof collected or _converg’d_ into two points at the bottom of the eye. Now, because these terminating Rays, and all the _intermediate_ ones which come from any part of the luminous body, are suppos’d by some sufficient refraction before they enter the eye, to have their pulses made _oblique_ to their progression, and consequently each Ray to have potentially _superinduc’d_ two proprieties, or colours, viz. a _Red_ on the one side, and a _Blue_ on the other, which notwithstanding are never actually manifest, but when this or that Ray has the one or the other side of it bordering on a dark or unmov’d _medium_, therefore as soon as these Rays are entred into the eye and so have one side of each of them bordering on a dark part of the humours of the eye, they will each of them actually exhibit some colour; therefore ADC the production of GACH will exhibit a _Blue_, because the side CD is _adjacent_ to the dark _medium_ CQDC, but nothing of a _Red_, because its side AD is _adjacent_ to the enlightned _medium_ ADFA: And all the Rays that from the points of the luminous body are collected on the parts of the _Retina_ between D and F shall have their _Blue_ so much the more _diluted_ by how much the farther these points of collection are distant from D towards F; and the Ray AFC the production of KCAI, will exhibit a _Red_, because the side AF is adjacent to the dark or quiet _medium_ of the eye APFA, but nothing of a _Blue_, because its side CF is _adjacent_ to the enlightned _medium_ CFDC, and all the Rays from the intermediate parts of the luminous body that are collected between F and D shall have their _Red_ so much the more diluted, by how much the farther they are distant from F towards D.

Now, because by the refraction in the _Cornea_, and some other parts of the eye, the sides of each Ray, which before were almost parallel, are made to _converge_ and meet in a point at the bottom of the eye, therefore that side of the _pulse_ which preceded before these refractions, shall first touch the _Retina_, and the other side last. And therefore according as this or that side, or end of the pulse shall be impeded, accordingly will the _impressions_ on the _Retina_ be varied; therefore by the Ray GACH refracted by the _Cornea_ to D there shall be on that point a stroke or impression confus’d, whose weakest end, namely, that by the line CD shall precede, and the stronger, namely, that by the line AD shall follow. And by the Ray KCAI refracted to F, there shall be on that part a confus’d stroke or impression, whose strongest part, namely, that by the line CF shal precede, and whose weakest or impeded, namely, that by the line AF shall follow, and all the intermediate points between F and D will receive impressions from the _converg’d_ Rays so much the more like the impressions on F and D by how much the nearer they approach that or this.

From the consideration of the proprieties of which impressions, we may collect these short definitions of Colours: That _Blue is an impression on the Retina of an oblique and confus’d pulse of light, whose weakest part precedes, and whose strongest follows._ And, that _Red is an impression on the Retina of an oblique and confus’d pulse of light, whose strongest part precedes, and whose weakest follows._

Which proprieties, as they have been already manifested, in the Prisme and falling drops of Rain, to be the causes of the colours there generated, may be easily found to be the efficients also of the colours appearing in thin _laminated_ transparent bodies; for the explication of which, all this has been premised.

And that this is so, a little closer examination of the _Phænomena_ and the _Figure_ of the body, by this _Hypothesis_ will make evident.

For first (as we have already observed) the _laminated_ body must be of a determinate thickness, that is, it must not be thinner then such a determinate quantity; for I have always observ’d, that neer the edges of those which are exceeding thin, the colours disappear, and the part grows white; nor must it be thicker then another determinate quantity; for I have likewise observ’d, that beyond such a thickness, no colours appear’d, but the Plate looked white, between which two determinate thicknesses were all the colour’d Rings; of which in some substances I have found ten or twelve, in others not half so many, which I suppose depends much upon the transparency of the _laminated_ body. Thus though the consecutions are the same in the scum or the skin on the top of metals; yet in those consecutions in the same colour is not so often repeated as in the consecutions in thin Glass, or in Sope-water, or any other more transparent and glutinous liquor; for in these I have observ’d, _Red, Yellow, Green, Blue, Purple; Red, Yellow, Green, Blue, Purple; Red, Yellow, Green, Blue, Purple; Red, Yellow, &c._ to succeed each other, ten or twelve times, but in the other more _opacous_ bodies the consecutions will not be half so many.

And therefore secondly, the _laminated_ body must be transparent, and this I argue from this, that I have not been able to produce any colour at all with an _opacous_ body, though never so thin. And this I have often try’d, by pressing small _Globule_ of _Mercury_ between two smooth Plates of Glass, whereby I have reduc’d that body to a much greater thinness then was requisite to exhibit the colours with a transparent body.

Thirdly, there must be a considerable reflecting body adjacent to the under or further side of the _lamina_ or _plate_: for this I always found, that the greater that reflection was, the more vivid were the appearing colours.

From which Observations, is most evident, that the reflection from the under or further side of the body is the principal cause of the production of these colours; which, that it is so, and how it conduces to that effect, I shall further explain in the following Figure, which is here described of a very great thickness, as if it had been view’d through the _Microscope_; and ’tis indeed much thicker than any _Microscope_ (I have yet us’d) has been able to shew me those colour’d plates of Glass, or _Muscovie-glass_, which I have not without much trouble view’d with it, for though I have endeavoured to magnifie them as much as the Glasses were capable of, yet are they so exceeding thin, that I have not hitherto been able positively to determine their thickness. This Figure therefore I here represent, is wholy _Hypothetical_.

Let ABCDHFE in the sixth Figure be a _frustum_ of _Muscovy-glass_, thinner toward the end AE, and thicker towards DF. Let us first suppose the Ray aghb coming from the Sun, of some remote luminous object to fall _obliquely_ on the thinner plate BAE, part therefore is reflected back by cghd, the first _Superficies_; whereby the perpendicular pulse ab is after reflexion propagated by cd, cd, equally remote from each other with ab, ab, so that ag + gc, or bh + hd are either of them equal to aa, as is also cc, but the body BAE being transparent, a part of the light of this Ray is refracted in the surface AB, and propagated by gikh to the surface EF, whence it is reflected and refracted again by the surface AB. So that after two refractions and one reflection, there is propagated a kind of fainter Ray emnf, whose pulse is not only weaker by reason of the two refractions in the surface AB, but by reason of the time spent in passing and repassing between the two surfaces AB and EF, ef which is this fainter or weaker pulse comes behind the pulse cd; so that hereby (the surfaces AB, and EF being so neer together, that the eye cannot _discriminate_ them from one) this confus’d or _duplicated_ pulse, whose strongest part precedes, and whose weakest follows, does produce on the _Retina_, (or the _optick nerve_ that covers the bottom of the eye) the sensation of a _Yellow_.

And secondly, this _Yellow_ will appear so much the deeper, by how much the further back towards the middle between cd and cd the spurious pulse ef is remov’d, as in 2 where the surface BC being further remov’d from EF, the weaker pulse ef will be nearer to the middle, and will make an impression on the eye of a _Red_.

But thirdly, if the two reflecting surfaces be yet further remov’d asunder (as in 3 CD and EF are) then will the weaker pulse be so farr behind, that it will be more then half the distance between cd and cd. And in this case it will rather seem to precede the following stronger pulse, then to follow the preceding one, and consequently a _Blue_ will be generated. And when the weaker pulse is just in the middle between two strong ones, then is a deep and lovely _Purple_ generated; but when the weaker pulse ef is very neer to cd, then is there generated a _Green_, which will be _bluer_, or _yellower_, according as the _approximate_ weak pulse does precede or follow the stronger.

Now fourthly, if the thicker Plate chance to be cleft into two thinner Plates, as CDFE is divided into two Plates by the surface GH then from the composition arising from the three reflections in the surfaces CD, GH, and EF, there will be generated several compounded or mixt colours, which will be very differing, according as the proportion between the thicknesses of those two divided Plates CDHG, and GHFE are varied.

And _fifthly_, if these surfaces CD and FE are further remov’d asunder, the weaker pulse will yet lagg behind much further, and not onely be _coincident_ with the second, cd, but lagg behind that also, and that so much the more, by how much the thicker the Plate be; so that by degrees it will be _coincident_ with the third cd backward also, and by degrees, as the Plate grows thicker with a fourth, and so onward to a fifth, sixth, seventh, or eighth; so that if there be a thin transparent body, that from the greatest thinness requisite to produce colours, does, in the manner of a Wedge, by degrees grow to the greatest thickness that a Plate can be of, to exhibit a colour by the reflection of Light from such a body, there shall be generated several consecutions of colours, whose order from the thin end towards the thick, shall be _Yellow, Red, Purple, Blue, Green; Yellow, Red, Purple, Blue, Green; Yellow, Red, Purple, Blue, Green; Yellow_, &c. and these so often repeated, as the weaker pulse does lose paces with its _Primary_, or first pulse, and is _coincident_ with a second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, &c. pulse behind the first. And this, as it is _coincident_, or follows from the first _Hypothesis_ I took of colours, so upon experiment have I found it in multitudes of instances that seem to prove it. One thing which seems of the greatest concern in this _Hypothesis_, is to determine the greatest or least thickness requisite for these effects, which, though I have not been wanting in attempting, yet so exceeding thin are these coloured Plates, and so imperfect our _Microscope_, that I have not been hitherto successfull, though if my endeavours shall answer my expectations, I shall hope to gratifie the curious Reader with some things more remov’d beyond our reach hitherto.

Thus have I, with as much brevity as I was able, endeavoured to explicate (_Hypothetically_ at least) the causes of the _Phænomena_ I formerly recited, on the consideration of which I have been the more particular.

First, because I think these I have newly given are capable of explicating all the _Phænomena_ of colours, not onely of those appearing in the _Prisme_, Water-drop, or Rainbow, and in _laminated_ or plated bodies, but of all that are in the world, whether they be fluid or solid bodies, whether in thick or thin, whether transparent, or seemingly opacous, as I shall in the next Observation further endeavour to shew. And secondly, because this being one of the two ornaments of all bodies discoverable by the sight, whether looked on with, or without a _Microscope_, it seem’d to deserve (somewhere in this Tract, which contains a description of the Figure and Colour of some minute bodies) to be somewhat the more intimately enquir’d into.

* * * * *

Observ. X. _Of _Metalline_, and other real Colours._

Having in the former Discourse, from the Fundamental cause of Colour, made it probable, that there are but two Colours, and shewn, that the _Phantasm_ of Colour is caus’d by the sensation of the _oblique_ or uneven pulse of Light which is capable of no more varieties than two that arise from the two sides of the _oblique_ pulse, though each of those be capable of infinite gradations or degrees (each of them beginning from _White_, and ending the one in the deepest _Scarlet_ or _Yellow_, the other in the deepest _Blue_) I shall in this _Section_ set down some Observations which I have made of other colours, such as _Metalline_ powders tinging or colour’d bodies and several kinds of tinctures or ting’d liquors, all which, together with those I treated of in the former Observation will, I suppose, comprise the several subjects in which colour is observ’d to be inherent, and the several manners by which it _inheres_, or is apparent in them. And here I shall endeavour to shew by what composition all kind of compound colours are made, and how there is no colour in the world but may be made from the various degrees of these two colours, together with the intermixtures of _Black_ and _White_.

And this being so, as I shall anon shew, it seems an evident argument to me, that all colours whatsoever, whether in fluid or solid, whether in very transparent or seemingly _opacous_, have the same efficient cause, to wit, some kind of _refraction_ whereby the Rays that proceed from such bodies, have their pulse _obliquated_ or confus’d in the manner I explicated in the former _Section_; that is, a _Red_ is caus’d by a duplicated or confus’d pulse, whose strongest pulse precedes, and a weaker follows: and a _Blue_ is caus’d by a confus’d pulse, where the weaker pulse precedes, and the stronger follows. And according as these are, more or less, or variously mixt and compounded, so are the _sensations_, and consequently the _phantasms_ of colours _diversified_.

To proceed therefore; I suppose, that all transparent colour’d bodies, whether fluid or solid, do consist at least of two parts, or two kinds of substances, the one of a substance of a somewhat differing _refraction_ from the other. That one of these substances which may be call’d the _tinging_ substance, does consist of distinct parts, or particles of a determinate bigness which are _disseminated_, or dispers’d all over the other: That these particles, if the body be equally and uniformly colour’d, are evenly rang’d and dispers’d over the other contiguous body; That where the body is deepest ting’d, there these particles are rang’d thickest, and where ’tis but faintly ting’d, they are rang’d much thinner, but uniformly. That by the mixture of another body that unites with either of these, which has a differing refraction from either of the other, quite differing effects will be produc’d, that is, the _consecutions_ of the confus’d pulses will be much of another kind, and consequently produce other _sensations_ and _phantasms_ of colours, and from a _Red_ may turn to a _Blue_, or from a _Blue_ to a _Red_, &c.

Now, that this may be the better understood, I shall endeavour to explain my meaning a little more sensible by a _Scheme_: Suppose we therefore in the seventh _Figure_ of the sixth _Scheme_, that ABCD represents a Vessel holding a ting’d liquor, let IIIII, &c. be the clear liquor, and let the tinging body that is mixt with it be EE, &c. FF, &c. GG, &c. HH, &c. whose particles (whether round, or some other determinate Figure is little to our purpose) are first of a determinate and equal bulk. Next, they are rang’d into the form of _Quincunx_, or _Equilaterotriangular_ order, which that probably they are so, and why they are so, I shall elsewhere endeavour to shew. Thirdly, they are of such a nature, as does either more easily or more difficultly transmit the Rays of light then the liquor; if more easily, a _Blue_ is generated, and if more difficultly, a _Red_ or _Scarlet_.

And first, let us suppose the tinging particles to be of a substance that does more _impede_ the Rays of light, we shall find that the pulse or wave of light mov’d from AD to BC, will proceed on, through the containing _medium_ by the pulses or waves KK, LL, MM, NN, OO; but because several of these Rays that go to the constitution of these pulses will be slugged or stopped by the tinging particles E, F, G, H; therefore there shall be _secundary_ and weak pulse that shall follow the Ray, namely PP which will be the weaker: first, because it has suffer’d many refractions in the impeding body; next, for that the Rays will be a little dispers’d or confus’d by reason of the refraction in each of the particles, whether _round_ or _angular_; and this will be more evident, if we a little more closely examine any one particular tinging _Globule_.

Suppose we therefore AB in the eighth _Figure_ of the sixth _Scheme_, to represent a tinging _Globule_ or particle which has a greater refraction than the liquor in which it is contain’d: Let CD be a part of the pulse of light which is _propagated_ through the containing _medium_; this pulse will be a little stopt or impeded by the _Globule_, and so by that time the pulse is past to EF that part of it which has been impeded by passing through the _Globule_, will get but to LM, and so that pulse which has been _propagated_ through the _Globule_, to wit, LM, NO, PQ, will always come behind the pulses EF, GH, IK, &c.

Next, by reason of the greater impediment in AB, and its _Globular_ Figure, the Rays that pass through it will be dispers’d, and very much scatter’d. Whence CA and DB which before went _direct_ and _parallel_, will after the refraction in AB, _diverge_ and spread by AP, and BQ; so that as the Rays do meet with more and more of these tinging particles in their way, by so much the more will the pulse of light further lagg behind the clearer pulse, or that which has fewer refractions, and thence the deeper will the colour be, and the fainter the light that is trajected through it; for not onely many Rays are reflected from the surfaces of AB, but those Rays that get through it are very much disordered.

By this _Hypothesis_ there is no one experiment of colour that I have yet met with, but may be, I conceive, very rationably solv’d, and perhaps, had I time to examine several particulars requisite to the demonstration of it, I might prove it more than probable, for all the experiments about the changes and mixings of colours related in the Treatise of Colours, published by the _Incomparable_ Mr. _Boyle_, and multitudes of others which I have observ’d, do so easily and naturally flow from those principles, that I am very apt to think it probable, that they own their production to no other _secundary_ cause: As to instance in two or three experiments. In the twentieth Experiment, this _Noble Authour_ has shewn that the deep _bluish purple-colour_ of _Violets_, may be turn’d into a _Green_, by _Alcalizate Salts_, and to a _Red_ by acid; that is, a _Purple_ consists of two colours, a deep _Red_, and a deep _Blue_; when the _Blue_ is diluted, or altered, or destroy’d by _acid Salts_, the _Red_ becomes predominant, but when the _Red_ is diluted by _Alcalizate_, and the _Blue_ heightned, there is generated a _Green_; for of a _Red_ diluted, is made a _Yellow_, and _Yellow_ and _Blue_ make a _Green_.

Now, because the _spurious_ pulses which cause a _Red_ and a _Blue_, do the one follow the clear pulse, and the other precede it, it usually follows, that those _Saline_ refracting bodies which do _dilute_ the colour of the one, do deepen that of the other. And this will be made manifest by almost all kinds of _Purples_, and many sorts of _Greens_, both these colours consisting of mixt colours; for if we suppose A and A in the ninth Figure, to represent two pulses of clear light, which follow each other at a convenient distance, AA, each of which has a _spurious_ pulse preceding it, as BB, which makes a _Blue_, and another following it, as CC, which makes a _Red_, the one caus’d by tinging particles that have a greater refraction, the other by others that have a less refracting quality then the liquor or _Menstruum_ in which these are dissolv’d, whatsoever liquor does so alter the refraction of the one, without altering that of the other part of the ting’d liquor, must needs very much alter the colour of the liquor; for if the refraction of the _dissolvent_ be increas’d, and the refraction of the tinging particles not altered, then will the preceding _spurious_ pulse be shortned or stopt, and not out-run the clear pulse so much; so that BB will become EE, and the _Blue_ be _diluted_, whereas the other _spurious_ pulse which follows will be made to lagg much more, and be further behind AA than before, and CC will become _ff_, and so the _Yellow_ or _Red_ will be heightned.

A _Saline_ liquor therefore, mixt with another ting’d liquor, may alter the colour of it several ways, either by altering the refraction of the liquor in which the colour swims: or secondly by varying the refraction of the coloured particles, by uniting more intimately either with some particular _corpuscles_ of the tinging body, or with all of them, according as it has a _congruity_ to some more especially, or to all alike: or thirdly, by uniting and interweaving it self with some other body that is already joyn’d with the tinging particles, with which substance it may have a _congruity_, though it have very little with the particles themselves: or fourthly, it may alter the colour of a ting’d liquor by dis-joyning certain particles which were before united with the tinging particles, which though they were somewhat _congruous_ to these particles, have yet a greater _congruity_ with the newly _infus’d Saline menstruum_. It may likewise alter the colour by further dissolving the tinging substance into smaller and smaller _particles_, and so _diluting_ the colour; or by uniting several _particles_ together as in precipitations, and so deepning it, and some such other ways, which many experiments and comparisons of differing trials together, might easily inform one of.