Chapter V: Treatment of Neuralgia (2)

Far more useful, in neuralgias generally, is the external application of aconite or of veratrine. Aconite may be employed in the milder or the stronger form; in the former case, we simply paint the ordinary tincture on the skin over the painful nerves (avoiding any cracks or sores); in the latter, we rub in an ointment containing one grain of the best hydrate of aconitine to the drachm of lard, about twice a day, and to such an extent as to maintain complete numbness of the parts continuously, for two, three, or four days. I do not believe that this will ever, by itself, cure a true neuralgia of any considerable severity; but I have more than once known its intervention, at a crisis in treatment when it seemed that other remedies might fail, produce a striking change in the progress even of a very bad case.

A milder, but still very useful form of the same kind of action, is produced by veratrine-ointment. I would recommend, however, as a rule, that it be employed, at any rate at first, of weaker strength than that recommended in the Pharmacopoeia, for with some persons it is easy to pass the anaesthetic, and to enter on the irritant, action of veratrine upon the skin. This leads me to give a caution that should properly have come earlier, when I was speaking of skin-stimulants. In aged subjects, especially, we rather frequently meet, in neuralgia, with a specially irritable state of the skin, even although there may be at the same time some loss of common and tactile sensation; and the practitioner must be warned against the danger of producing an amount of skin-irritation which will fearfully annoy his patient. I speak feelingly, having by such an indiscretion lost the richest patient who ever favored my consulting-room with his presence!

The inunction of mild veratrine-ointment is extremely useful, as an adjunct to other treatment, in migraine and supra-orbital neuralgias of suckling women, and of chlorotic girls. I have also seen it do much good in mammary neuralgia.

The last division of the subject of paralyzing agents in the treatment of neuralgia includes the surgical operations for division or resection of a painful nerve. Upon this question there is much difficulty in speaking decidedly. I admit at once, of course, that surgical interference is evidently indicated when, along with decided and intractable neuralgic pain, there is plain evidence either of the existence of a neuromatous tumor, or the presence of a foreign body impacted, or a tight cicatrix pressing upon a nerve. I admit, also, though with much greater qualifications, that carious teeth may need to be extracted before we can cure a neuralgia; but even here I should put in the decided caveat that we must consider whether the system is in a state to bear the shock, and that in any case we probably ought to mitigate the effects of the operation by performing it under chloroform. And I need hardly tell any one, who is familiar, either practically or from reading, with the subject, that thousands of carious teeth have been extracted from the mouths of neuralgic patients, not only without benefit, but with the effect of distinctly aggravating the disease. And I am yet more doubtful as to the advisability of such surgical procedures as the division or the resection of a piece of the painful nerve. Theoretically, as the reader will understand from the strong opinion I have given as to the mainly central origin of neuralgias, I never could anticipate that such a procedure would be more than temporarily successful; on the contrary, the mischief in the central end of the nerve remaining, I should suppose that the trying process of the reunion of the nerve (which always takes place) would be almost certainly attended with a revival of the neuralgia, too probably in an aggravated form. The only two cases of excision of a piece of the nerve, that I have ever seen, completely answered to this anticipation. In common fairness, however, I must admit that there is a large amount of evidence on the other side. Neuralgias of the trigeminus are pretty nearly the only cases in which the proposal of neurotomy or neurectomy ought to be entertained; in mixed nerves the inconvenience of the muscular paralyses that would follow would be usually too serious to allow of our incurring them. But resection of painful branches of the trigeminus has been performed in a great number of instances, more especially by German surgeons, with results that merit our attention; the cases recorded by Nussbaum, Wagner, Bruns, and Podratzki, may be especially referred to. On the other hand, with the exception of simple division of the nerve, which can be subcutaneously performed, and is a trivial proceeding (but has very short-lived effects), these operations are by no means without danger, especially when they are pushed to such a length as the opening of bony canals, and the resection of considerable portions of bone in order to get sufficiently far toward the centre, and fatal results have in more than one case followed. Above all, we can never too seriously reflect on the most interesting case of Niemeyer's reported by Wiesner,[40] in which the most formidable operations of this kind have been performed, in an apparently desperate case of epileptiform facial tic, and in which, after all, the application of the constant current painlessly effected an infinitely greater amount of good than had been done by all those severe and painful surgical manipulations. I think it is impossible, after this, not to conclude that neurectomy ought never to be even thought of except as a last resort, in cases of extreme severity, after other measures had been patiently tried and had decisively failed.

(_c_) Of remedies that are intended to relieve local congestion, I must speak with very doubtful approbation. Leeches or scarifications are, I think, very seldom of value. The only remedy that has sometimes seemed to do good is local compression, and, after all, it is quite as likely that this acts by anaesthetizing the nerve as by reducing congestion.

(_d_) Remedies that interfere mechanically with arterial pulsation are of considerable value where they can be effectively applied. I have already pointed out the specially aggravating effect of the momentarily-repeated shocks of arterial pulsation upon neuralgic pain. Where, then, it is possible, effectively to control an artery pretty near to the point where it divides into the branches that lie close to the painful part of the nerve, it is always worth while to try the experiment. But such a measure as the compression of the carotid in trigeminal neuralgia is of very doubtful propriety; I suspect the consequent anaemiation of the brain more than does away with any benefit that might be mechanically produced. And any attempt to interfere with the general arterial circulation by cardiac depressants is not to be permitted for an instant.

(_e_) We enter now upon a most important subject, the treatment of neuralgia by electricity. It is necessary to exercise much caution in speaking upon this topic, and, as I shall have to express somewhat decided opinions, I may be excused for referring to the circumstances under which I have arrived at my present stand-point upon this question. I can hardly be accused of having, with any very rash haste, espoused the cause of medical electricity in the therapeutics of pain, as any one will see who cares to turn to my article on Neuralgia[41] written only three years ago. At that time I had already been studying the subject for a considerable period, but was so convinced of the multitude of opportunities for fallacy that beset the student of electro-therapeutics, that I was unwilling to state more than the minimum of what I hoped and believed might be affected by this mode of treatment. Since that time I have become more fully acquainted with the researches of foreign observers, and, with the help of their indications, have been able to apply myself more fruitfully to my personal inquiries into the matter. The result is, that I am now able to speak with far greater assurance of the positive value of electricity as a remedy for neuralgic pain. I shall make bold to say that nothing but the general ignorance of the facts can account for the extraordinary supineness of the mass of English practitioners with regard to this question.

In the first place, I have arrived at a decided conviction that Faradic electricity is of little or no value in true neuralgias, and that the cases which are apparently much benefited by it will invariably be found, on more careful investigation, to belong to some other category.

On the effect of frictional electricity I have had such very small experience that I cannot venture to speak with any confidence, and the accounts that I have heard from others whose experience is much larger have not led me to attribute much importance to this agent. If I am to judge at all, I should say it merely acts as a skin-stimulant, and is, in that capacity, inferior to many other simpler and more facile applications.

Very different is the verdict of experience as regards the effects of the constant current; here the results which I have obtained have been so remarkable that even now I should distrust their accuracy, were it not that they are in accord with the general result which (among minor discrepancies) may be gathered, we may fairly say, from all the more important researches that have lately been carried out in Germany. The constant current, as I now estimate it, is a remedy for neuralgia unapproached in power by any other, save only blistering and hypodermic morphia, and even the latter is often surpassed by it in permanence of affect; while it is also applicable in not a few cases where blistering would be useless or worse.

The English medical profession has not as yet adequately appreciated the necessity for great care in the choice of apparatus and the mode of application of electricity. It is all-important, however, and especially in the case of applying galvanism for the relief of pain. The first quality that must be absolutely required in a battery, that is to be used for this purpose, is that it shall deliver its current with as little as possible variation of tension, in fact that it shall be constant, and not merely continuous; a vast majority of all the various galvanic apparatus that have been used have been merely the latter, and have consequently been almost valueless for the relief of pain. Such are Pulvermacher's chains, the voltaic piles made with elements of metallic gauze, Cruickshank's battery, and many others that have been used. A sufficiently constant current may be obtained from either of the following apparatuses, (1) Daniell's battery, (2) Bunsen's, (3) Smee's. For hospital use, the Daniell battery (in Muirhead's modification, or with the form of cells introduced by Siemens-Halske) is perhaps the most desirable; but for private practice it is worth while to sacrifice something of the superior constancy which we gain in the Daniell battery for the sake of comparative portability. All purposes which we aim at in the electric treatment of neuralgia may be sufficiently obtained by the use either of the Bunsen battery (zinc-carbon, excited by dilute sulphuric acid), as modified by Stohrer, or by the Smee battery (zinc and platinized silver, excited by dilute sulphuric acid), as in the highly convenient apparatus devised by Mr. Foveaux, of Weiss & Son's. It must be remarked that, for the purpose of treating neuralgia, we shall never need to employ more than fifteen, or at the utmost twenty, cells of either of these batteries. Both the Stohrer's Bunsen and the modified Smee of Weiss are made so that the elements are not immersed in the exciting fluid until the moment when the battery is going to be used; a simple mechanism at once throws the battery into or out of gear. In this way, destruction of the elements is minimized; and either of these two batteries may be used for from three to six months without any renewal, supposing the average work done to be one or two daily seances. If the battery is worked harder, it will require more frequent revivification. I strongly recommend London practitioners to deliver themselves from all care and trouble about the repair of their batteries, by making an agreement with the manufacturers to inspect and set them in order at stated intervals. The country practitioner, on the other hand, will do well to familiarize himself with the process of renewing the acid, of cleaning the plates, of amalgamating the zinc, etc.; in fact, to make himself independent of the manufacturer in every thing short of an actual renewal of the elements, when that becomes necessary. For all further details respecting the above-named, and other batteries, I must refer the reader to systematic works on medical electricity.[42] I must now pass on to the various modes of application, and the cautions to be observed.

It is, in the first place, necessary to say, that all the best observers coincide in the statement that the use of a current intense enough to produce actual pain or severe discomfort is never to be thought of in the treatment of true neuralgias; such practice will infallibly do harm. Only such a current is to be employed as produces merely a slight tingling, and (on prolonged application) a slight burning sensation, with a little reddening of the skin at the negative electrode. This being the case, it is perhaps not unnatural for those who have not had practical experience, to suspect that an application which causes so little palpable perturbation is devoid of any positive influence at all. Such skepticism will certainly not survive any tolerably lengthened observation of the actual facts; but, as some persons may be deterred by this _prima-facie_ view of the case from making any fair trial of the current, it may be worth while, here, to allude to the unmistakable physical effects which similarly painless constant currents are repeatedly observed to produce in cases of motor-paralysis attended with a wasted condition of muscles. Those who have had experience of the treatment of such cases know that it is a by no means infrequent thing to see both muscles and nerves aroused from a state of complete torpidity, and brought into a condition in which the Faradic current, quite powerless before, is again able to excite powerful contractions, while, at the same time, the bulk of the muscles has increased most sensibly. These, surely, are sufficient indications of a positive action of the painless constant current; and such facts have now been recorded, in multitudes, by most competent observers.

The next maxim of first-rate importance is that the applications of the current should be made at regular intervals, and at least once daily; in most instances, this is enough, but occasionally it will be found useful to operate twice in the day. The matter of regularity is, I find, of great consequence, and it will not do to intermit the galvanism immediately on the occurrence of a break in the neuralgic attacks: it should be continued for some days longer.

The length of sittings is a point as to which there is considerable difference of opinion between various authorities; but my own experience coincides with that of Eulenburg, that from five to ten, or, at the utmost, fifteen minutes, is almost the range of time.

Closely connected with the question of the length of sittings, is that of the continuity with which the current is to be applied. I have seen the best results, on the whole, from passing a weak current, without any breaks, for about five minutes. But, where there are several foci of intense pain, it will often be advisable to apply the current to each of these, successively, for three or four minutes.

The places to which the electrodes should be applied vary much according to the nature of the case.

Benedikt's rule, that the application of electricity, to be useful, must be made to the seat of the disease, is undoubtedly true; but it is capable of being applied in a somewhat different manner from that which he recommends in particular cases, the difference being due to the view of the pathology of neuralgia which is taken in this work. That view is, that the essential _locus morbi_ is always in the posterior nerve-root (and usually in that portion of the root which is within the substance of the cord), and that the peripheral source of irritation, if any, is only of secondary--though sometimes of considerable--importance. Hence the main object, in electrization, would seem to be to direct the influence of the current upon the posterior nerve-root. This may, however, be done in different ways, according to the situations in which we place the electrodes, and the direction in which we send the current.

There are, as yet, very considerable differences of opinion among electro-therapeutists as to the principles which should govern us, both in the localization of the effect and the direction of the current. Benedikt, for example, recommends that the current should be directed toward the supposed seat of the mischief. Thus, if we suppose a neuralgia to depend on morbid action within the spinal cord, then we may galvanize the spine, taking care to make the current come out through any vertebra over which we detect tenderness. If we suppose the seat of the disease to be in the nerve-root in the mere ordinary sense of the word, then we apply the positive pole to the vertebra opposite the highest nerve-origin that can be concerned, and we stroke the negative pole down by the side of the spinous processes, some forty times in succession. The proportion of cases of idiopathic neuralgia in which this treatment succeeds is, according to Benedikt, very large. In other cases, he sends the current from the cord to the apparent seat of pain.

On the other hand, Althaus[43] tells us that, whether the application be central or peripheral, it is the positive pole, alone, which should be applied to the part which we intend to affect: and that the application of the negative pole in this situation is rather likely to do harm than good, as proving too exciting. Eulenburg, also, says that in general the positive pole should be applied to the seat of the disease, the negative on an indifferent spot, or on the peripheral distribution of the nerve.

It is, however, very doubtful to me whether, in the majority of cases, the direction of the current makes any considerable difference in its effects, provided only that the stream is fairly directed so as to include the _locus morbi_ in the circuit, and care is taken to apply it with sufficient persistence and with not too great intensity. Upon this point I am glad to be able to cite the authority of Dr. Reynolds, whose experience is very large. This author, while admitting that in theory the "direct" and the "inverse" currents would seem likely to have different effects, declares that in practice this does not prove to be the case, either in the instance of pain of nerve or of spasm of muscle. Dr. Buzzard, also, in relating a very striking case (which I had the advantage of personally observing) before the Clinical Society, particularly mentioned that the direct and the inverse currents had a precisely similar effect in relieving the pain. The patient suffered from severe and probably incurable cervico-brachial neuralgia; the poles were placed, respectively, on the nape of the neck and in the hand of the affected limb, and whether the positive was on the nape and the negative in the hand, or _vice versa_, the effect was the same. Very striking remission of the pain was always produced, and the immunity from suffering sometimes lasted for a considerable time, while no other plan of treatment seemed to have more than the most momentary effect.

My own experience tells the same story very decidedly, for I have on very many occasions obtained great benefit, both by the direct and by the inverse currents, in the same patient. I shall here relate a few instances:

CASE I.--A married woman, aged forty-eight, whose menstrual periods had ceased quietly some six years previously. She was, on the whole, a healthy person, but had suffered from migraine in her youth, and came of a neurotic family. She was attacked with severe cervico-brachial neuralgia, which resisted all treatment for nearly three months, and, on her then trying a month's change of air and absence from medication, became worse than ever. The constant current was applied, from ten (and afterwards fifteen) cells of Weiss's battery, daily for twenty-four days, the pain vanished finally at the end of thirteen days, and the accompanying anaesthesia and partial paralysis disappeared before the treatment was concluded. In this case the negative pole was applied by the side of the three lower cervical vertebrae, and the positive was applied, successively, to three or four different parts of the most intense peripheral pain.

CASE II.--A young lady, aged twenty-four, suffered from neuralgia in the leg. Galvanization (twenty cells Daniell), from the anterior tibial region to the spine was found invariably to cut short the pain. I now reversed the current; the effect was the same. After ten sittings I suspended the treatment, as there had been no attack for three days; but a week later the neuralgia returned in full fury. I resumed galvanization from periphery to spine; after twelve more sittings the attacks had become rare and slight. I continued treatment for eight days longer, during the whole of which time there was no pain. It had not recurred when I saw her fifteen months afterward.

CASE III.--H. G., a footman, aged twenty-three, applied to me at Westminster Hospital, with neuralgia of the first and second divisions of the right trigeminus, of six weeks' standing. The right eye was bloodshot and streaming with tears, the skin of the right side of the nose and right cheek was anaesthetic, the right levator palpebrae was partially paralyzed. Hypodermic injections of morphia proved only very temporarily beneficial. After a fortnight's treatment with this and with flying blisters to the nape of the neck and the mastoid process, I commenced the use of the constant current daily (ten cells, Weiss). The first application (positive on nape, negative on infra-orbital foramen) stopped the pain, and procured fourteen hours' immunity. On the next day I reversed the current; the pain stopped after three minutes' galvanization; it did not recur for four days, during which time, however, I continued the daily use of the direct current. On the sixth day of treatment the patient came to me with a somewhat severe paroxysm, almost limited to the ophthalmic division; it was accompanied by spasmodic twitchings of the eyelid, and copious effusion of altered Meibomian secretion, looking like pus. Galvanization from supra-orbital foramen to nape stopped the pain in five minutes. The next day the patient presented himself, quite free from pain, which had not returned; the conjunctiva was clear, and there was no visible Meibomian secretion. Inverse galvanization was continued for ten days; but no recurrence of the pain took place. The cure was permanent three months later.

On the contrary, we sometimes see complete failure of the current to affect any good whatever; and in these cases the reversal of the current has not, so far, appeared to me to make any particular change in the result. Such was the case with a patient whose history I detailed (along with that of Case I.) to the Clinical Society. She was an ill-fed and overworked unmarried needle woman, aged thirty; the neuralgia was a most violent double occipital pain, with foci, on each side, where the great occipital nerves become superficial. The current was passed daily, for some days, from one focus to another (necessarily passing through the nerve-roots and the spinal cord), and the positions of the conductors were occasionally reversed; this not succeeding, the current was applied altogether to the spine, the negative pole being placed on the highest cervical vertebrae, but no good effect was produced after a treatment, altogether, of sixteen days.

Notwithstanding these, and a good many similar facts that could be adduced, I should hesitate to go so far as to say that there is never any importance in the direction of the current. In old-standing cases, where there are well-marked _points douloureux_ that are exceedingly sensitive, I have found that the application of the positive pole, successively, on the most tender points, the negative being placed on the spine opposite the point of origin of the nerve, has had a more beneficial effect than any other mode of application.

There are very considerable differences, both as to the best manner of galvanization, and also as to the chances of doing good with it, in the case of neuralgias of different nerves; and, on the whole, I find Eulenburg's conclusions on this matter very just. He indicates sciatica as the affection which is by far the most curable by the constant current; he says that many cases are cured in from three to five sittings, while others require as many weeks, or even months of treatment; and that a total absence of benefit is only seen in rare cases dependent on central causes, or on diseases which are irremovable (like malignant pelvic tumors). On the other hand, he reports that intercostal neuralgia has never been materially benefited by galvanization in his hands. With regard to ordinary trigeminal neuralgias, he speaks strongly of the current as a palliative, but very doubtfully of its power to cure, in genuine and severe cases. In cervico-brachial neuralgia he speaks of it as dividing with hypodermic morphia the whole field of useful treatment, in the majority of cases. In cervico-occipital neuralgia he says it rarely does much good. I shall return to Eulenburg's estimate of its utility in migraine, presently. Let me here say that I am inclined to indorse everything in the above-detailed statements, excepting that I should place a considerably higher estimate on the curative powers of the current in ordinary trigeminal neuralgias. The remedy, like every other, will doubtless fail in a considerable number of those very bad cases which occur in the degenerative period of life; but if anyone desires to see the proof of the power it sometimes exerts, even in extreme cases, he should study the two most remarkable cases treated by Prof. Niemeyer, of Tubingen, and reported by Dr. Wiesner.[44] The patients were respectively aged sixty-four and seventy-four, and the duration of the neuralgia had been respectively five and twenty-nine years; in both the pain was of the severest type, and in both the success was most striking. In one of them every possible variety of medication, and several distinct surgical operations for excision of portions of the affected nerve, had been quite vainly tried. The cases are altogether among the most interesting facts in therapeutics that have ever been recorded. Dr. Russell Reynolds has also told me of a case under his own care, in which a lady, who had been the victim, for twenty years, of an extremely severe neuralgia of the ophthalmic division of the fifth, which attacked her daily, and had caused great injury to her general health and nutrition, was not merely benefited, but the affection absolutely removed, at any rate for a long period, by a single application of the current. I have personally seen no such remarkable cases as these but I have had some extremely severe cases under my care in which the effect of the current was to arrest the pain in a few applications, and procure a remission for several days, or even weeks. And I have had several slighter cases which were as much cured, to all appearance, as any disease can be, by any remedy.

As a general rule, neuralgia of the limbs requires to be treated with a more powerful current than neuralgia of the face (twenty cells instead of ten). In the latter case, indeed, it is necessary to be exceedingly cautious (commencing with five cells), since a current of high power has been known to produce most serious effects upon the deeper-seated organs; the retina has been permanently paralyzed, by too strong a current applied on the face, and still graver dangers attend the incautious use of galvanization of the brain or of the sympathetic, of which we have now to speak.

Galvanization of the brain is a remedy chiefly employed in true migraine, and is certainly very effective in that disease. I have not found it useful to apply the current in the long axis of the cranium, but transmitted from one mastoid process to the other it has proved most useful; and I am glad to find that my experience on this point coincides with that of Eulenburg. But the use of this remedy is highly perilous in careless hands. In working with either Daniell's or Weiss's battery, it is necessary to use at first only three or four cells, and to increase the number only with the greatest caution. The sittings should never last more than half a minute; but the slightest giddiness should make us stop even sooner. On the other hand, the applications ought to be made daily, and usually twice a day. Ten cells (Daniell or Weiss) is the utmost that will ever be required, few patients will bear so much; and, apart from the possibility of more serious mischief, there is nothing which annoys and frightens patients more seriously than the sudden and intense vertigo which over-galvanization of the brain may induce.

Even more ticklish than the galvanization of the cerebral mass is galvanization of the sympathetic. I am not going to raise here the vexed question in physiological electricity as to the possibility of a galvanization the effects of which shall be accurately limited to the sympathetic. The fact is unquestionable, that very powerful and peculiar effects, utterly unprocurable in any other way, can be produced by placing one pole on the superior cervical ganglion (just behind and below the angle of the jaw) and the other on the manubrium sterni. This is a mode of galvanization which has been highly praised, more especially by Remak, and after him by Benedikt, but it has yielded rather disappointing results in neuralgia in my hands. Either I have not observed any distinct effect at all, or, if a current even a very little too strong were applied, I have repeatedly seen most uncomfortable, and sometimes very alarming, symptoms. I shall not easily forget a patient who applied at the Westminster Hospital, suffering from a severe form of facial neuralgia, and who was persuaded to come to my house and have his sympathetic galvanized. I used only twenty cells of Daniell, but the current had not been applied more than a few seconds when the patient fell on the floor, and remained in a state of half swoon for a considerable time. I allude to this and other less dangerous accidents that I have seen follow galvanization of the sympathetic, not with the view to prove that the method is useless in trigeminal neuralgia--I should certainly hesitate to say that, considering the large amount of respectable evidence in its favor--but I think that it is a procedure requiring the utmost caution, and meantime I have not personally found it nearly so useful as the methods already described.

There are sundry special applications of galvanism to particular forms of neuralgia which require a few words of notice. Of electrical treatment in regular angina pectoris I have had no experience; and in the one case of intercostal neuralgia, complicated with quasi-anginal attacks, in which I applied the constant current to the spine and the cardiac region, in the direction of the affected intercostal nerve, no effect was produced. I shall, however, mention the experience of Eulenburg, as he is a sober and dispassionate writer on the effects of electric treatment in general. He says he believes that in the proper use of the constant current we shall discover the chief, possibly the only direct, remedy for angina; and he describes the apparently favorable results he has already obtained in three or four cases. The current was from thirty cells; the positive pole was placed on the sternum (broad electrode), the negative on the lower cervical vertebrae. The alternative method which Eulenburg suggests, but has not, so far, put in practice, is direct galvanization of the sympathetic and vagus in the neck.

The application of the constant current in neuralgic affections of the larynx and pharynx is of most indisputable service; the experience of Tobold[45] upon this point is fully borne out by my own, as far as it goes. In many cases it will be sufficient to place the positive pole (from fifteen cells Weiss) on the pomum Adami, and the negative on the nape of the neck, and to keep up a continuous current for five or ten minutes daily; but in some cases the direct application of the current to the pharynx or larynx may be required; in such, a modification of Dr. Morell Kackenzie's laryngeal conductor will be found useful. [I shall have occasion, in Part II., to notice the superior action of Faradization in mere hysteric throat-pain, as distinguished from true neuralgia.]

Neuralgia of the testicle can be best treated, if galvanism be thought necessary, by immersing the whole scrotum in a basin of salt and water, in which the positive pole is placed: the negative pole is to be placed on the upper lumbar vertebrae; the current should be from fifteen cells Weiss, and the application should last continuously for ten minutes. In neuralgia of the urethra, I should be inclined to adopt a plan, mentioned to me by Dr. Buzzard, of attaching one conductor to an ordinary silver catheter introduced into the urethra, and placing the other pole upon the perinaeum.

Neuralgia of the neck of the bladder I have found to be materially relieved by the constant current from twenty cells passed through from pubis to perinaeum; the sittings being rather long. I have also, on one occasion, tried the introduction of a proper _porte-electricite_, insulated, except at the tip; but the result was not superior to that obtained in the other way.

As a general rule, it may be said that electricity, like other local measures which tend to concentrate the patient's attention on the parts, is only to be applied to the genital organs as a last resort. This is, of course, especially true in the neuralgias of these organs in women.

In concluding what will doubtless seem to some English readers an over-long and over-favorable estimate of the employment of galvanism in neuralgias, I must carefully guard myself against the supposition that I consider it a remedy to be applied in all cases, or likely to meet with uniform success, even in the forms of the disease to which it is most appropriate. It is a weapon which I seldom employ in the first instance, for many reasons; the principal of which is the costliness of the proceeding to the patient. Either the physician must personally administer the remedy, daily, often for a considerable period, or he must make the patient provide himself with an expensive battery; and in the latter case there is, after all, the unsatisfactory consideration that the application (even after the most careful directions have been given) will perhaps be unskilfully and inefficiently made. On the other hand, it is not desirable to delay the employment of galvanism too long, if other remedies have been fairly tried; and the practitioner will do well to remember the distinctions above laid down as to the varieties of neuralgia in which it is specially likely to prove decidedly and quickly beneficial. More especially in sciatica it would really, with our present knowledge, be a decided neglect of duty were we to allow the disease to run any considerable length without giving the constant current a thorough trial. [I can only briefly refer, here, to the novel mode of galvanization introduced by Dr. Radcliffe, and based upon his ingenious theory, according to which the true effects of the voltaic current upon nerve are the result of the charge of free electricity which it sets up, and not of the current directly. The reader will find the whole argument elaborately worked out in Dr. Radcliffe's recent work on "The Dynamics of Nerve and Muscle," Macmillan & Co., 1871. It will be enough to say, here, that the object to be attained, according to this view, is to replace the neuralgic nerve in its healthy physiological state, by charging it with free positive electricity. The manner in which this is done is as follows: In a case, _e. g._, of cervico-brachial neuralgia, we place the positive pole as near as may be to the central origin of the affected nerve; the negative pole is held in the hand of the same side, which is immersed in a basin of warm salt and water. In this same basin is another electrode, the wire from which is put in communication with the earth--most conveniently by putting it in contact with a gas-pipe. The patient, and the battery, ought properly to be insulated. The result of this arrangement is, that the free negative electricity is carried off by the earth-wire, and the limb remains charged with free positive electricity. I have had no sufficient experience of this method to give any opinion of its merits, but the inventor thinks it decidedly superior to the ordinary modes of applying the constant current.]

(_f_) The last kind of local remedies for neuralgia of which we have to speak are those by which we seek to mitigate the paroxysm by thoroughly excluding the air from the site of apparent pain. These are chiefly of value in those cases where a distinct inflammation (herpetic or erysipelatoid), or an unusual degree of sensitiveness on pressure, etc., has become developed around the superficial branches of the neuralgic nerve. Very much the best agent of this kind with which I am acquainted is the flexible collodion; in neuralgic herpes and erysipelas the effect of this application, conjoined with the hypodermic injection of morphia (preferably in the immediate neighborhood), is of the greatest possible service in mitigating the pain. In herpes it has this further special advantage, that it prevents the occurrence of sores after the vesicles fall, an accident which otherwise will sometimes happen, and which very much increases the severity and intractability of the consecutive neuralgic pain.

4. Lastly, we have to speak of prophylactic measures, which really ought never to be thought of as a separate matter, but always as an essential and most important part of the treatment of neuralgia. The prophylaxis of neuralgia is divisible into (_a_) measures for preventing the development of the neuralgic habit in those who may be supposed to have a predisposition to it; (_b_) measures between the paroxysms; (_c_) measures to be adopted after the attacks have ceased.

(_a_) The measures that should be taken to avert neuralgia, in those who may be reasonably assumed to be predisposed to it, have scarcely received any consideration at the hands of systematic writers; yet this is a most important subject. The persons in question are children who belong to families known to be infected with tendencies to neurotic diseases, or persons whose daily occupations submit them to peculiarly strong predisposing influences of an external kind. The hostile influences that should be avoided, or at any rate compensated, are of several kinds: (1) Psychical; (2) defects of nutrition; (3) mismanagement of the muscular system; (4) sexual irregularities; (5) over-fatigue of the special senses, and insufficiency of sleep, especially the latter; (6) unhealthy atmosphere and climate.

(1) The psychical influences which must be especially avoided, if we would avert the formation of the neuralgic habit, form a large and somewhat indefinite group, which it is doubtless difficult to deal with satisfactorily. The matter is, however, highly important, and the attempt must be made. And there are, at any rate, some leading principles that I feel justified in laying down with confidence.

We shall best commence the inquiry by directing our attention once more to the fact, so often insisted upon in this work, that the large majority of neuralgic patients carry in them the seeds of their malady from their birth. It has been amply proved that every child born of a family that has shown strong tendencies to insanity, epilepsy, paralysis, etc., etc., ought to be looked on as a neurotic subject, and as a potential sufferer from neuralgia. It has been shown that such children will be exposed, even under favoring external circumstances, to the danger of neuralgia at certain important stages of their physiological history. The earliest of these critical periods is marked by the occurrence of puberty; and it is not till this time that psychical influences, as such, come to have any serious bearing on the formation of the neuralgic habit. Mischief may, indeed, be done to the brain and the general nervous system, by injudicious mental training, at a far earlier period; but this mischief, serious or even fatal as it may be, usually takes some other form than that of neuralgia. It will be necessary, here, to reflect a little upon certain features of the childish mind, in order that we may rightly estimate the kind of influence which puberty exerts upon it.

A very young child is selfish, in the purely animal sense; it is greedily acquisitive, and its selfishness is unchecked by any sense of shame. With later childhood there comes a sense of right and wrong, and a sensitiveness to shame, which check this tendency; still it is the exception rather than the rule to find any great capacity of self-abnegation in young school-boys. But a moderately healthy-minded child, up to the age of puberty, is only acquisitively selfish; he is not self-centered in the sense of dwelling upon his own mental state, and reflecting upon the nature of his motives and feelings. It is with the age of puberty that self-consciousness begins to be a feature in the mind of the young, and its appearance marks the entrance of a dangerous element into the character. It is an inevitable stage in mental growth, and, if wisely dealt with, is ultimately productive, not of evil, but of good; but it is more perilous to some children than to others, and it is especially fraught with danger to those whose nervous centres are, by inheritance, weak and unstable in whole or in parts. The mental antidote to its possible evil effects is to be found in a vigorous (but not excessive) training of the mind in studies which shall be as far as possible external, and the discouragement of all tendencies to introspection. I would venture to express the decided opinion that the common idea, that close study injures the young, is only true in a modified sense. It is, however, unquestionably the fact, that hasty and imperfect cram-work does very seriously impair the stability of the brain and the nervous system in young people; there is a spurious excitement about this kind of learning (especially when it is mainly competitive, and directed to the gaining of prizes and medals) which must be injurious. But I think it is quite ridiculous to suppose that, in this country, the actual amount of intellectual labor undergone by boys and girls at school is sufficient to do harm, were it only regular and systematic, and carried out in a conscientious manner; on the contrary, though I think that the total daily period occupied in study ought not to exceed some six or seven hours, I believe that the insisting on strenuous diligence during school hours, and the maintenance of a high standard as to the quality of the work exacted, is all on the side of nervous health. But, an even more serious and difficult matter than the regulation of the amount of intellectual work to be done is, the question how we are to deal with the unfolding emotional instincts of the boy or girl who has reached the age of puberty. It is useless to ignore this side of the mental life; it will assert itself either for good or for evil. At the risk of seeming to meddle with matters that belong to the school-master rather than to the physician, I would urge very strongly that a portion of the training be deliberately directed to a serious study of one or other of the fine arts--to that one, whether poetry, painting, sculpture, or music, to which the boy or the girl instinctively leans. I am aware that there is a prejudice among parents that the study of the fine arts renders young people idle and indifferent to other branches of education and other duties of life. I believe that this only applies to the miserably inefficient way of teaching these subjects which prevails at present in all but a few English schools; and that, in truth, a thorough knowledge of the principles of either music or painting, and a real study of the best masters, would be sure to prevent the development of that lazy, conceited manner, and that neglect of other duties, which no doubt unfavorably distinguish a good many of the young ladies and gentlemen who dabble a little in music, or painting, or versification. We want the German rather than the English type of training, we want the acquirement of sound knowledge of the principles of music (at any rate) to be made so common that the accidental possession of two pennyworth of superficial accomplishment in that line shall not enable young ladies and gentlemen to give themselves airs in society. The truth is, that the young people who make music or painting an excuse for idleness respecting other matters are invariably imposters even in that which is their own supposed _forte_. On the other hand, the serious study of art, a certain definite portion of time being set apart for it, and thoroughness being insisted upon, is, I believe, an admirable vent for the emotional effervescence of commencing sexual life; and I no less firmly believe that the things that are usually substituted for it are intensely pernicious. I have already, in the chapter on Pathology, remarked on the mischief which is often done by the anxiety of religious parents to make their children (usually somewhere about this perilous time of puberty) experience the emotional struggle which is believed to end in a change of heart and principles. I need, therefore, only now repeat the expression of my intense conviction that the results of this process, as seen by the physician to occur within that mental region where the emotions and the organic nervous system come into closest relations, are simply disastrous. It is not my business to suggest the proper alternative to a mode of spiritual training which I think deleterious; I can only intimate, in the most general way, my belief that a calm and systematic training in the simplest principles of duty and religion is greatly more suitable to the immature mind and brain of youth than any strong emotional excitement on such topics. But if ill-regulated spiritual emotion of a religious kind be a dangerous thing for young persons in the most serious crisis of bodily development, far more decidedly pernicious is the spurious excitement of feeling which is directed to lower and often most unworthy objects. The increasing precocity of boys and girls, in their familiarity with the most objectionable aspects of passion and intrigue, is steadily fed, in the present day, by a system that allows them, too often, unlimited access to light literature which (as is strikingly the case with many novels of our day) is at once devoid of true literary and artistic merit and at the same time replete with sensational incident of a vulgarly exciting kind. The same degrading tendency is very distinctly to be noted in the character of the dramatic and other public exhibitions which are most popular at the present day; the main characteristics being, bad art, and thinly-veiled sensuality, all the more pernicious for being veiled at all. It would be a hundred times better that a boy, or even a girl, should study the frank and outspoken descriptions to be found in Shakespeare or Fielding, with all their occasional coarseness, than that they should enervate their minds with the sickly trash that is most current and most popular at the present day, in theatre and circulating library.

(2) The defects of nutrition that assist the development of the neuralgic tendency are often the consequence of a system which, it is to be hoped, is to a large extent becoming effete, but which, nevertheless, survives in sufficient vigor and extent to demand express reprobation. It was till lately the general, and it is still a too common practice, to keep children and young persons on a very insufficient allowance of the most important elements of food; the state of things in this respect, both in public and private schools, in the first half of the present century, is a lasting reproach to the medical practitioners of those days, who scarcely lifted a finger to amend it, even when they did not expressly approve it, under the influence of absurd theories about the dangers of excessive "grossness of blood." It is indeed amazing that, with the palpable fact staring them in the face, of the rapid and incessant additions to tissues which are being made by children and young people, medical men should have failed to perceive the necessity for supplies of food practically unlimited except by the capacity of digestion. Yet this seems hardly ever to have been thought of, and the unfortunate results seem scarcely to have been noticed, except when they led to emaciation or consumptive disease. But the effects were perhaps even more disastrous where, with a maintenance of a fair amount of muscular nutrition, there was only a little dyspepsia, and perhaps some slight tendency to nervousness, to show that anything was wrong. The children who were born of strong and healthy parents, may have suffered comparatively little from this regimen as regards their nervous system, but those who were born of neurotic ancestors undoubtedly suffered extensively. The crisis of puberty was, in such ill-nourished children, too frequently the signal for an explosion of epilepsy, chorea, or neuralgia; and too often the mischief was yet further increased by a most injudicious medical treatment, including a deterioration rather than an improvement in the already insufficient dietary system. At the present day, however, we may fairly hope that common sense is prevailing, so as to put an end to this mischief as regards the children of the upper and middle classes. Unfortunately, with the poor a similar ill-nourishment of the young is too often inevitable, and the consequences are constantly to be traced in enfeeblement of the nervous system, of which neuralgia is a pretty common result.

It cannot be too frequently repeated that for those children, more especially those who come of nervous families, any considerable error in this direction has a fatal tendency to awaken the disposition to nervous disease. At every step of the infancy, childhood, and youth of such persons, the most generous allowance of the more nutritive elements of food is of the first importance. At the same time I am entirely opposed to the practice of giving stimulants to any considerable extent, or indeed to any extent, save in exceptional instances. Good meat, bread, milk, butter, fruit, and vegetables, are really the efficacious means of fortifying the nervous system against the impending dangers. With hospital out-patients, for whom we cannot command such diet, our best course, whenever they show signs of deficient nutrition, will be the steady administration of cod-liver oil for a long period.

(3) The true and proper training of the muscular system is among the most important means of antagonizing the tendency to the development of the neuralgic habit. It is a great mistake to suppose that over-training in athletics of any kind is of use; but the systematic employment of means which tend to make the muscular system hardy and efficient is of very great benefit. The parents of children who may be supposed by inheritance to possess a tendency to neuralgia would do well to study such a methodical series of directions as those which are given by Mr. Maclaren, in his excellent work on physical training. I suspect that the benefit of judicious gymnastics is wrought in two ways: first, by its improving circulation and general nutrition, including the nutrition of the nervous centres; and, secondly, that it gives the nervous centres an education, so to speak, by the variety of difficult co-ordinative movements over which it trains those centres to preside. But unquestionably the matter is a science, not a mere rude art, and requires to be studied as such.