Chapter XXVIII

EXTERNAL EVIDENCES--AMERICAN TRADITIONS AND MYTHOLOGIES.

Turning from that branch of American antiquities which deals with the extent and location of ruined cities and monuments of the ancient American civilizations to the consideration of American traditions concerning the origin, migrations, cosmogony, and the religion of the people of the western world, we by no means leave behind us the difficulty of divided authorities, and varying opinions. One could not hope, even in an extended work on the subject, to bring order out of the chaos which obtains concerning American traditions and mythologies; therefore, I need say nothing of the futility of attempting it in the few brief chapters which I have resolved to devote to these traditions. But this much must be evident respecting the relationship of the Book of Mormon to American traditions and mythologies, viz., that several epoch-making incidents in the Book of Mormon must have made such indelible impressions upon the mind of the ancient peoples of America that they would be perpetuated in various forms in their traditions. Such incidents, for example, as the Jaredite and Nephite migrations from the old world to the western hemisphere; and since the former colony came directly from the Tower of Babel, it is to be expected that they would bring with them a knowledge of the creation, the fall of man, the flood, the escape of Noah and his family by means of the ark, and the building of the Tower of Babel. Lehi's colony came from Jerusalem, bringing with them the Jewish scriptures, which speak so clearly of the creation, the flood, the escape of Noah, the building of Babel and the confusion of tongues, hence it would be expected that they, too, would have a knowledge of these chief events in the history of man down to this last named event, and a knowledge also of the chief events in the history of Israel down to the time of the departure of Lehi's colony from Jerusalem--six hundred years B. C. It is but a reasonable expectation, I say, that these things would be perpetuated in American traditions and mythologies. Are traces of them to be found there? So also as to the signs given on the American continent of Messiah's birth; and certainly as to the signs of his crucifixion, witnessed by the terrible cataclysms which continued in the western hemisphere during three hours, followed by three days of awful darkness. Also some trace in their traditions would be found of Messiah's personal advent on the American continent to the survivors of those events. So, too, would the recollection of the golden age of peace and plenty which followed Messiah's advent, and the promise of Messiah's return at some future time--some memory of all this would most likely be perpetuated in native traditions. And while both traditions and mythologies may be regarded as troubled pools which, like mirrors shattered into a thousand fragments, distort into fantastic shapes the objects on their banks, still there is a basis of truth in them; and American traditions and mythologies may yield up something of value in the way of evidence to the truth of the Book of Mormon. Surely we would be greatly disappointed if this turned out not to be the case, for the historical incidents referred to in the Book of Mormon are so impressive that they would be found to live in the traditions of the people, whatever became of their written records. As remarked by H. H. Bancroft:

Every trace of the circumstances that give rise to a tradition is
soon lost, although the tradition itself in curiously modified
forms is long preserved. Natural convulsions, like floods and
earthquakes, famines, wars, tribal migrations, naturally leave an
impression on the savage mind which is not easily effaced, but
the fable in which the record is embodied may have assumed a form
so changed and childish that we pass over it today as having no
historical value, seeking information only in an apparently more
consistent tale, which may have originated at a recent date from
some very trivial circumstances. * * * * * But the traditions of
savages, valueless by themselves for a time more remote than one
or two generations, begin to assume importance when the events
narrated have been otherwise ascertained by the records of some
contemporary nation, throwing indirectly much light on history
which they were powerless to reveal. [1]

Accepting as reasonable these reflections, I wish to add that having in part the written records of the people among whom the events happened of which the traditions treat, we are in possession of that which makes these traditions assume the importance to which our author alludes. And while the record referred to--the Book of Mormon--gives the necessary importance to the traditions, the traditions bear testimony to the truth of the record at many points.

It should be remembered, however, that such were the conditions existing among the Lamanites after their triumph at Cumorah, that everything is confused and distorted into most fantastic shapes and relations by the idle speculations and vain imaginings of half, and sometimes wholly, barbarous minds, often bent on concealing or supplanting the truth by their fabulous inventions.

The limits of this work will not permit anything like an extended investigation of the field proposed. I shall merely take up the most important facts and historical events of the Book of Mormon, and seek confirmation of them in American traditions and myths.

I.

_The Creation._

I begin with the creation; and select upon that subject a passage from the book of the Quiches [2] of Guatemala called _Popol Vuh_, which, I believe, exhibits the fact that the ancient Americans held in their traditions conceptions of creation found in the Jewish scriptures. A word upon the Popol Vuh will be necessary. This is one of the most important of the native American books translated into modern languages. It was found by Dr. Scherzer, in 1854, among the manuscripts of Francisco Ximenez, "a Dominican father of great repute for his learning and his love of truth," who, while fulfilling the duties of his office of curate, in a small Indian town in the highlands of Guatemala, translated this native book into the Spanish language. It was written by one or more Quiches in the Quiche language, but in Roman letters, some time after the Spaniards had occupied Gautemala. The meaning of _Popol Vuh_ is "National Book," or "Book of the People," but the real original "National Book" had been lost, and this was written to replace it. The title of the book, however, is that given to it by the Abbe Brasseur de Bourbourg, who translated it into French; and by Ximenez, who translated it into Spanish. This name, Max Muller says, "is not claimed for it by its author. He [the native author] says that the wrote when the _Popol Vuh_ [that is, the real original National Book of the Quiches, and which this book in question was written to replace] was no longer to be seen. Now, _Popol Vuh_ means the Book of the People, and referred to the traditional literature in which all that was known about the early history of the nation, their religion and ceremonies, was handed down from age to age." [3] Nadaillac, however, says that _Popol Vuh_ may be translated "Collection of Leaves." [4] In the conclusion of a long note on the subject Bancroft says, "We seem justified, then, in taking this document for what Ximenez and its own evidence declare it to be, viz., a reproduction of an older work or body of Quiche traditional history, written because the older work had been lost and was likely to be forgotten; and written by a Quiche not long after the Spanish conquest." [5]

As the passage I quote is from Bancroft's abridgment of the _Popol Vuh_, I give also his brief explanation of the book:

Of all American peoples the Quiches, of Guatemala, have left us
the richest mythological legacy. Their description of the creation
as given in the _Popol Vuh_, which may be called the national
book of the Quiches, is in its rude, strange eloquence and poetic
originality, one of the rarest relics of aboriginal thought.
Although obliged in reproducing it to condense somewhat, I have
endeavored to give not only the substance, but also, as far as
possible, the peculiar style and phraseology of the original. It is
with this primeval picture, whose simple, silent sublimity is that
of the inscrutable past, that we begin: [6]

And now the passage on the creation:

And the heaven was formed, and all the signs thereof set in their
angle and alignment, and its boundaries fixed toward the four
winds by the Creator and Former, and Mother and Father of life
and existence--he by whom all move and breathe, the Father and
Cherisher of the peace of nations and of the civilization of his
people--he whose wisdom has projected the excellence of all that is
on the earth, or in the lakes, or in the sea.

Behold the first word and the first discourse. There was as yet
no man, nor any animal, nor bird, nor fish, nor crawfish, nor any
pit, nor ravine, nor green herb, nor any tree; nothing was but the
firmament. The face of the earth had not yet appeared, only the
peaceful sea and all the space of heaven. There was nothing yet
joined together, nothing that clung to anything else; nothing that
balanced itself, that made the least rustling, that made a sound
in the heaven. There was nothing that stood up; nothing but the
quiet water, but the sea, calm and alone in its boundaries; nothing
existed; nothing but immobility and silence, in the darkness, in
the night.

Alone also the Creator, the Former, the Dominator, the Feathered
Serpent, those that engender, those that give being, they are upon
the water, like growing light. They are enveloped in green and
blue; and therefore their name is Gucumatz. Lo, now how the heavens
exist, how exists also the Heart of Heaven; such is the name of
God; it is thus that he is called. And they speak; they consulted
together and meditated; they mingled their words and their opinion.
And the creation was verily after this wise: Earth, they said,
and on the instant it was formed; like a cloud or a fog was its
beginning. Then the mountains rose over the water like great
lobsters; in an instant the mountains and the plains were visible,
and the cypress and the pine appeared. Then was the Gucumatz filled
with joy, crying out: Blessed be thy coming, O Heart of Heaven,
Hurakan, Thunderbolt. Our work and our labor has accomplished its
end.

The earth and its vegetation having thus appeared, it was peopled
with the various forms of animal life. And the Makers said to the
animals: Speak now our name, honor us, as your mother and father;
invoke Hurakan, the Lightning-flash, the Thunderbolt, that strikes,
the Heart of Heaven, the Heart of the Earth, the Creator and
Former, him who begets, and him who gives being, speak, call on us,
salute us! So was it said to the animals. But the animals could
not answer; they could not speak at all after the manner of men;
they could only cluck, and croak, each murmuring after his kind in
a different manner. This displeased the Creators, and they said to
the animals: Inasmuch as ye can not praise us, neither call upon
our names, your flesh shall be humiliated; it shall be broken with
teeth; ye shall be killed and eaten.

Again the gods took counsel together; they determined to make man.
So they made a man of clay; and when they had made him, they saw
that it was not good. He was without cohesion, without consistence,
motionless, strengthless, inept, watery, he could not move his
head, his face looked but one way; his sight was restricted, he
could not look behind him; he had been endowed with language, but
he had no intelligence, so he was consumed in the water.

Again is there counsel in heaven: Let us make an intelligent being
who shall adore and invoke us. It was decided that a man should be
made of wood and a woman of a kind of pith. They were made; but
the result was in no wise satisfactory. They moved about perfectly
well, it is true; they increased and multiplied; they peopled
the world with sons and daughters, little wooden mannikins like
themselves; but still the heart and the intelligence were wanting;
they held no memory of their Maker and Former; they led a useless
existence, they lived as the beasts lived; they forgot the Heart of
Heaven. They were but an essay, an attempt at men; they had neither
blood, nor substance, nor moisture, nor fat; their cheeks were
shrivelled, their feet and hands dried up; their flesh languished.

Then was the Heart of Heaven wroth; and he sent ruin and
destruction upon those ingrates; he rained upon them night and day
from heaven with a thick resin; and the earth was darkened. And the
men went mad with terror; they tried to mount upon the roofs and
the houses fell; they tried to climb the trees and the trees shook
them far from their branches; they tried to hide in the caves and
the dens of the earth, but these closed their holes against them.
The bird Xecotcovach came to tear out their eyes; and the Camalotz
cut off their head; and the Cotzbalam devoured their flesh; and the
Tecumbalam broke and bruised their bones to powder. Thus were they
all devoted to chastisement and destruction, save only a few who
were preserved as memorials of the wooden men that had been; and
these now exist in the woods as little apes.

Once more are the gods in council; in the darkness, in the night
of a desolate universe do they commune together, of what shall we
make man? And the Creator and Former made four perfect men; and
wholly of yellow and white maize was their flesh composed. These
were the names of the four men that were made: the name of the
first was Balam-Quitz; of the second, Balam-Agab; of the third,
Muhucutah; and the fourth, Iqi-Balam. They had neither father
nor mother, neither were they made by the ordinary agents in the
work of creation; but their coming into existence was a miracle
extraordinary wrought by the special intervention of him who is
preeminently the Creator. Verily, at last, were there found men
worthy of their origin and their destiny; verily, at last, did the
gods look on beings who could see with their eyes, and handle with
their hands, and understand with their hearts. Grand of countenance
and broad of limb the four sires of our race stood up under the
white rays of the morning star. Sole light as yet of the primeval
world--stood up and looked. Their great clear eyes swept rapidly
over all; they saw the woods and the rocks, the lakes and the sea,
the mountains and the valleys, and the heavens that were above all;
and they comprehended all and admired exceeding. Then they returned
thanks to those who had made the world and all that therein was: We
offer up our thanks, twice--yea verily, thrice! We have received
life; we speak, we walk, we taste; we hear and understand; we
know, both that which is near and that which is far off; we see
all things, great and small, in all the heaven and earth. Thanks,
then, Maker and Former, Father and Mother of our life! we have been
created; we are.

But the gods were not wholly pleased with this thing; Heaven they
thought had overshot its mark; these men were too perfect; knew,
understood, and saw too much. Therefore there was council again in
heaven: What shall we do with man now? It is not good, this that
we see; these are as gods; they would make themselves equal with
us; lo, they know all things, great and small. Let us now contract
their sight, so that they may see only a little of the surface of
the earth and be content. Thereupon the Heart of Heaven breathed a
cloud over the pupil of the eyes of men, and a veil came over it as
when one breathes on the face of a mirror, thus was the globe of
the eye darkened; neither was that which was far off clear to it
any more, but only that which was near.

Then the four men slept, and there was council in heaven: and four
women were made, to Balam-Quitze was allotted Caha-Paluma to wife;
to Balam-Agab, Chomiha; to Muhucutah, Tzununiha; and to Iqi-Balam,
Cakixaha. Now the women were exceedingly fair to look upon; and
when the men awoke, their hearts were glad because of the women.

Notwithstanding some incongruities in the foregoing passage a comparison of it with the account of creation in Genesis will not fail to convince the thoughtful reader that the Quiche story of the creation, and that of Genesis doubtless had the same origin, and after reading it again and again, as suggested by Max Muller, one must come to the conclusion that "some salient features standing out more distinctly, make us feel that there was a ground work of noble conceptions which has been covered and distorted by an aftergrowth of fantastic nonsense." [7] Indeed, so "startling," as Muller further remarks, are some of the coincidences between the Old Testament and the Quiche manuscripts that it has been suspected by some authors [8] that the Quiche writers followed rather the Spanish, Christian teachings than the Quiche tradition in that part of their work; "yet even if a Christian influence has to be admitted," remarks our author, "much remains in these American traditions which is so different from anything else in the national literature of other countries that we may safely treat it as the genuine growth of the intellectual soil of America." [9] In the light which the Book of Mormon throws upon the subject, however, we are not under the necessity of admitting the "Christian influence" referred to by Muller; that is, that the natives arrived at the Biblical knowledge of the creation facts after the advent of the Christians among them, since the Jaredites brought with them a knowledge of creation as held by antediluvians, and the Nephites brought with them a knowledge of that same account of creation as crystallized in the writings of Moses, which undoubtedly became permanently fixed both in the written records and traditions of the native inhabitants of America; and which are reflected in this old Quiche book, _Popol Vuh_.

There is a quotation from another authority that I wish to add to the statement of Professor Max Muller in the foregoing, relative to the creation ideas of the Quiches, being a "groundwork of noble conceptions which has been covered and distorted by an aftergrowth of fantastic nonsense." That additional authority--though the remark I quote has reference to another people, the Aztecs, is in the same line of thought as that which Professor Muller suggests, but applied to the whole religion of the natives--is from Prescott:

In contemplating the religious system of the Aztecs, one is
struck with its apparent incongruity, as if some portion of it
had emanated from a comparatively refined people, open to gentle
influences, while the rest breathes a spirit of unmitigated
ferocity. It naturally suggests the idea of two distinct sources,
and authorities the belief that the Aztecs had inherited from their
predecessors a milder faith, on which was afterwards engrafted
their own mythology. The latter soon became dominant, and gave
its dark coloring to the creeds of the conquered nations--which
the Mexicans, like the ancient Romans, seem willingly to have
incorporated into their own, until the same funereal superstitions
settled over the farthest borders of Anahuac. [10]

If the noted German and American authors respectively had been writing with full knowledge of what the Book of Mormon reveals on this subject, they could not more exactly have stated the case than they have here done, though enlightened only by the facts they discovered in the religion of the natives; for surely the Book of Mormon gives us the information that both the Jaredite and the Nephite people had knowledge of the true God, and the latter, especially, a full knowledge of the mild and gentle religion taught by Jesus Christ; which religion, however, was subverted in the western world, and overlaid by the revolting superstition and horribly ferocious idolatry, attended by human sacrifice and cannibalism of the Lamanites or Aztecs.

Another point of the coincidence [between native American
traditions and the Bible] is found in the goddess Cioacoatl, "our
lady and mother;" "the first goddess who brought forth;" "who
bequeathed the suffering of childbirth to women, as the tribute of
death;" "by whom sin came into the world." Such was the remarkable
language applied by the Aztecs to this venerated deity. She was
usually represented with a serpent near her; and her name signified
the "serpent-woman." In all this we see much to remind us of the
mother of the human family, the Eve of the Hebrew and Syrian
nations. [11]

On this passage Prescott also has the following note:

Torquemada, not content with the honest record of his predecessor,
whose manuscripts lay before him, tells us, that the Mexican Eve
had two sons, Cain and Abel. [12] The ancient interpreters of the
Vatican and Tellerian Codices add the further tradition, of her
bringing sin and sorrow into the world by plucking the forbidden
rose; (_Antiquities of Mexico_, vol. VI, explan. of Plate. 7,
20); and Veytia remembers to have seen a Toltec or Aztec map,
representing a garden with a single tree in it, round which was
coiled the serpent with a human face! (_Hist. Antiq_., lib. 1, ch.
1). [13]

"After this," continues Prescott, sarcastically, "we may be prepared for Lord Kingsborough's deliberate confession that the Aztecs had a clear knowledge of the Old Testament and most probably of the New, though somewhat corrupted by time and hieroglyphics!" I see no occasion for the sarcasm on the part of the admirable author of the _Conquest of Mexico_, since he himself furnishes much of the material that would warrant a conclusion similar to that of Kingsborough. [14] Kingsborough's conclusion comes in his note two, [15] in which he deals with "American traditions which appear to be derived from a Hebrew source;" and as the passage referred to by Prescott is of great value as material in proof not only of his lordship's position that the ancient Americans were acquainted with portions, at least, of the Old Testament, but also sustains the truth of the Book of Mormon at a number of points--which will be noted later--I give it _in extenso_:

It is unnecessary to attempt in this place to trace out any further
scriptural analogies in the traditions and mythology of the New
World, since the coincidences which have been already mentioned are
sufficiently strong to warrant the conclusion that the Indians,
at a period long antecedent to the arrival of the Spaniards in
America, were acquainted with a portion at least of the Old
Testament, although time, superstition, and above all, such an
imperfect mode of transmitting to posterity the memory of the past
events as that of painting, had greatly corrupted their ancient
traditions. We shall close these observations with the following
curious extract from Torquemada, from which it might appear that
even the New Testament had been known to the Indians: "Another
ecclesiastic, named Brother Diege de Mercado, a grave father, who
has been definer of this province of the Holy Gospel, and one of
the most exemplary men and greatest doers of penance of his time,
relates, and authenticates this relation with his signature, that
some years ago conversing with an aged Indian of the Otomies, above
seventy years old, respecting matters concerning our faith, the
Indian told him that they in ancient times had been in possession
of a book which was handed down successively from father to son, in
the person of the eldest, who was dedicated to the safe custody of
it and to instruct others in its doctrines. These doctrines were
written in two columns, and between column and column Christ was
painted crucified, with a countenance as of anger. They accordingly
said that God was offended; and out of reverence did not turn over
the leaves with their hands, but with a small bar which they had
made for that purpose, which they kept along with the book. On
this ecclesiastic's questioning the Indian as to the contents of
that book and its doctrines, he was unable to give him further
information, but simply replied that if the book had not been lost,
he would have seen that the doctrine which he taught and preached
to them, and those which the book contained, were the same; that
the book had rotted in the earth, where the persons who kept it had
buried it on the arrival of the Spaniards. He likewise informed
him that they knew the world had been destroyed by the deluge, and
that only seven persons had escaped in the ark, and that all the
rest had perished, together with the animals and birds, excepting
those which had been saved therein. They were also acquainted with
the embassy of the angel of Our Lady, under a figure, relating
that something very white, like the feather of a bird, fell from
heaven, and that a virgin stooped down and took it up and put it
in her bosom and became pregnant; but what she brought forth they
could not tell. What they said of the deluge, is attested likewise
in Guatemala by the Indians named Achies, who assert that they
possessed paintings recording the event, with other matters of
antiquity, all of which the Brothers, [Spanish Catholic priests]
with the spirit and zeal with which they were animated for the
destruction of idolatry, took from them and burnt, holding them to
be suspicious. [16]

II.

_The Flood._

I next call attention to the native American traditions concerning the flood, consulting those passages, however, let me say, which most nearly resemble the account of our Hebrew scriptures; and without pretending to enter into an exhaustive consideration of native flood myths. My purpose is accomplished in this, as in the matter of the traditions concerning the creation, if I produce those proofs which, in my judgment, establish the fact that the native Americans have been made acquainted with the facts of the creation and the flood, found in our Jewish scriptures; and I am not at all concerned here with the variations that native traditions have given to the main truths.

The following is from Prescott:

No tradition has been more widely spread among nations than that
of a Deluge. Independently of tradition, indeed, it would seem to
be naturally suggested by the interior structure of the earth,
and by the elevated places on which marine substances are found
to be deposited. It was the received notion under some form or
other, of the most civilized people in the Old World, and of
the barbarians of the new. The Aztecs combine with this some
particular circumstances of a more arbitrary character, resembling
the accounts of the east. They believed that two persons survived
the deluge, a man, named Coxcox and his wife. Their heads are
represented in ancient paintings, together with a boat floating on
the waters, at the foot of a mountain. A dove is also depicted,
with the hieroglyphical emblem of languages in his mouth, which he
is distributing to the children of Coxcox, who were born dumb. The
neighboring people of Michuacan, inhabiting the same high plains
of the Andes, had a still further tradition, that the boat, in
which Tezpi, their Noah, escaped, was filled with various kinds of
animals and birds. After some time, a vulture was sent out from
it, but remained feeding on the dead bodies of the giants, which
had been left on the earth, as the waters subsided. The little
humming-bird, huititzilin, was then sent forth, and returned with a
twig in its mouth. The coincidence of both these accounts with the
Hebrew and Chaldean narratives is obvious. [17]

This is from Bancroft:

In Nicaragua, a country where the principal language was a Mexican
dialect, it was believed that ages ago the world was destroyed by
a flood in which the most part of mankind perished. Afterward the
teotes, or gods, restocked the earth as at the beginning. [18]

Connected with the great flood of water, there is a Mexican
tradition presenting some analogies to the story of Noah and his
ark. In most of the painted manuscripts supposed to relate to this
event, a kind of boat is represented floating over the waste of
water and containing a man and a woman. Even the Tlascaltecs, and
Zapotecs, the Miztecs, and the people of Michoacan are said to have
had such pictures. The man is variously called Coxcox, Teocipactli,
Tezpi, and Nata; the woman Xochiquetzal and Nena. The following has
been usually accepted as the ordinary Mexican version of this myth:
In Atonatiuh, the Age of water, a great flood covered all the face
of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof were turned into fishes.
Only one man and one woman escaped, saving themselves in the hollow
trunk of an ahahuete or bald cypress; the name of the man being
Coxcox, and that of his wife Zochiquetzal. On the waters abating a
little they grounded their ark on the Peak of Colhuacan, the Ararat
of Mexico. Here they increased and multiplied, and children began
to gather about them, children who were all born dumb. And a dove
came and gave them tongues, innumerable languages. Only fifteen of
the descendants of Coxcox, who afterward became heads of families,
spake the same language or could at all understand each other;
and from these fifteen are descended the Toltecs, the Aztecs, and
the Acolhuas. * * * * * * In Michoacan a tradition was preserved,
following which the name of the Mexican Noah was Tezpi. With
better fortune than that ascribed to Coxcox, he was able to save,
in a spacious vessel, not only himself and his wife, but also his
children, several animals, and a quantity of grain for the common
use. When the waters began to subside, he sent out a vulture that
it might go to and fro on the earth and bring him word again when
dry land began to appear. But the vulture fed upon the carcasses
that were strewn in every part, and never returned. Then Tezpi sent
out other birds, and among these was a humming-bird. And when the
sun began to cover the earth with a new verdure, the humming-bird
returned to its old refuge bearing green leaves. And Tezpi saw that
his vessel was aground near the mountain of Colhuacan and he landed
there. [19]

The Peruvians had several flood-myths. One of them relates that the
whole face of the earth was changed by a great deluge, attended by
an extraordinary eclipse of the sun which lasted five days. All
living things were destroyed except one man, a shepherd, with his
family and flocks. * * * * According to another Peruvian legend,
two brothers escaped from a great deluge which overwhelmed the
world in much the same manner, by ascending a mountain which
floated upon the flood. When the waters had retired, they found
themselves alone in the world; and having consumed all their
provisions, they went down into the valleys to seek for more food.
[20]

The following is from Lord Kingsborough's works:

The Peruvians were acquainted with the deluge, and believed
that the rainbow was the sign that the earth would not again be
destroyed by water. This is plain from the speech which Mango
Capac, the reported founder of the Peruvian empire, addressed to
his companions on beholding the rainbow rising from a hill; which
is thus recorded by Balboa in the ninth chapter of the third
part of his _Miscellanea Antarctica_: "They traveled on until a
mountain, at present named Guanacauri, presented itself to their
view, when, on a certain morning, they beheld the rainbow rising
above the mountain, with one extremity resting upon it, when Mango
Capac exclaimed to his companions, This is a propitious sign that
the world will not be again destroyed by water; follow me, let
us climb to the summit of this mountain, that we may thence have
a view of the place which is destined for our future habitation.
Having cast lots and performed various superstitious ceremonies,
after this manner, they directed their course towards the mountain.
It is scarcely necessary to observe, that to draw omens or to
determine chances by throwing lots, was an ancient Hebrew custom,
resorted to on the most solemn, as well as the most trivial
occasions. Proof having been afforded in the passage quoted from
the history of Balboa, that the Peruvians were acquainted with the
history of the rainbow, as given in the ninth chapter of Genesis,
it may be interesting to add, that according to the account of
an anonymous writer, they believed that the rainbow was not only
a passive sign that the earth would not be destroyed by a second
deluge, but an active instrument to prevent the recurrence of
such a catastrophe: the latter curious notion proceeded upon the
assumption that as the water of the sea (which, like the Jews, they
believe to encircle the whole earth) would have a tendency to rise
after excessive falls of rain, so the pressure of the extremities
of the rainbow upon its surface would prevent its exceeding its
proper level. [21]

Nadaillac calls attention to the fact of a general belief in a deluge or a flood among the American races and comments upon the fact that we are dependent upon writers for our account of the traditions who are not always free from mental bias and who have derived their information from individuals who had been subjected to missionary teachings and who were more or less familiar with what he calls the myths and legends of the Christians. "Notwithstanding these disadvantages," he remarks, however, "it will be seen that a general belief, for instance, of a deluge or flood is widely spread among American races, and can hardly be attributed to Christian teachings." [22]

One might continue quoting passages of the foregoing character indefinitely, but I consider what has been set down on these matters sufficient. [23]

Footnotes

1. The reader will find preceding the table of contents in this volume a pronunciation of the principal Spanish and Mexican proper names found in this work.

2. _Chips from a German Workshop_, vol. I, p. 325.

3. _Pre-Historic America_, p. 144, note.

4. _Native Races_, vol. III, pp. 42, 43.

5. _Native Races_, vol. III, pp. 42, 43. [24]

6. _Chips from a German Workshop_, vol. I, pp. 328-9.

7. Nadaillac _Pre-Historic America_, p. 144, note. This writer says of the book in question. "It contains several details strangely resembling those of Genesis, and some have seen in them an adaptation by a pious fraud of Indian mythology to the dogmas of Christianity."

8. _Chips from a German Workshop_, p. 128.

9. _Conquest of Mexico_, vol. I, Prescott, p. 62.

10. _Conquest of Mexico_, Prescott, vol. II, p. 387.

11. _Morarch Ind_., lib. 6, chap. 31.

12. Prescott, _Conquest of Mexico_, vol. II, pp. 387, 388, note.

13. See Appendix no. 1, vol. II, of Prescott's _Conquest of Mexico_.

14. Vol. VI, Kingsborough's _Antiquities of Mexico_, pp. 401-409.

15. _Antiquities of Mexico_, Kingsborough, vol. XI, p. 409.

16. _Conquest of Mexico_, Prescott, vol. II, appendix pp. 385, 386.

17. _Native Races_, Bancroft, vol. III, p. 75.

18. _Native Races_, vol. III, pp. 65-67.

19. _Native Races_, vol. V, pp. 14, 16.

20. Kingsborough's _Mexican Antiquities_, vol. VIII, p. 25, note.

21. _Pre-Historic America_, p. 525.

22. Whoever desires to pursue the subject further may do so by consulting Bancroft's _Native Races_, vol. V, chapter one, and vol. III, chapter two; as also the works of Prescott, the monumental volumes of Kingsborough, (the latter can be accessible to but few, however), and chapter 5 of Ignatius Donnelley's _Atlantis_. Also _Pre-Historic America_ (Nadaillac), chapter 10, and _The History of America Before Columbus_, (De Roo) vol. I, chapter sixteen.

23. _Native Races_, vol. V, pp. 137, 138.