Chapter XVIII: Section V: Of the elisions that are allowed in our versification
In verses consisting only of a certain number of syllables, nothing can be of more ease, or greater use to poets, than the retaining or cutting off a syllable from a verse, according as the measure of it requires; and therefore it is requisite to treat of the elisions that are allowable in our poetry, some of which have been already taken notice of in the preceding section.
By elision I mean the cutting off one or more letters from a word, whereby two syllables come to be contracted into one, or the taking away an entire syllable. Now when in a word of more than two syllables, which is accented on the last save two, the liquid _r_ happens to be between two vowels, that which precedes the liquid admits of an elision. Of this nature are many words in _ance_, _ence_, _ent_, _er_, _ous_, and _ry_; as temperance, preference, different, flatterer, amorous, victory: which are words of three syllables, and often used as such in verse; but they may be also contracted into two by cutting off the vowel that precedes the liquid, as temp'rance, pref'rence, diff'rent, flatt'rer, am'rous, vict'ry. The like elision is sometimes used when any of the other liquids _l_, _m_, or _n_, happen to be between two vowels in words accented like the former; as fabulous, enemy, mariner, which may be contracted fab'lous, en'my, mar'ner. But this is not so frequent.
Observe, that I said accented on the last save two; for if the word be accented on the last save one, that is to say, on the vowel that precedes the liquid, that vowel may not be cut off. And therefore it is a fault to make, for example, sonorous two syllables, as in this verse;
"With Son'rous Metals wak'd the drowsy Day."—_Blac._
Which always ought to be three, as in this,
"Sonorous Metals blowing martial sounds."—_Milton._
In like manner, whenever the letter _s_ happens to be between two vowels in words of three syllables, accented on the first, one of the vowels may be cut off; as pris'ner, bus'ness, &c.
Or the letter _c_ when it is sounded like _s_; that is to say, whenever it precedes the vowel _e_ or _i_; as med'cine for medicine. Or _v_ consonant, as cov'nant for covenant.
To these may be added the gerunds of all verbs whose infinities end in any of the liquids, preceded by a vowel or a diphthong, and that are accented on the last save one; for the gerunds being formed by adding the syllable _ing_ to the infinitive, the liquid that was their final letter comes thereby to be between two vowels; and the accent that was on the last save one of the infinitive, comes to be on the last save two of the gerunds: and therefore the vowel or diphthong that precedes the liquid may be cut off; by means whereof the gerund of three syllables comes to be but of two; as from travel, travelling, or trav'ling; from endeavour, endeavouring, or endeav'ring, &c.
But if the accent be on the last syllable of such a verb, its gerund will not suffer such an elision. Thus the gerund of devour must always be three syllables, devouring, not dev'ring; because all derivatives still retain the accent of their primitives, that is, on the same syllable; and the accent always obliges the syllable on which it is to remain entire.
The gerunds of the verbs in _ow_, accented on the last save two, suffer an elision of the _o_ that precedes the _w_; as foll'wing, wall'wing.
The particle _it_ admits of an elision of its vowel before it was, were, will, would; as 'tis, 'twas, 'twere, 'twill, 'twould, for it is, it was, &c.
It likewise sometimes suffers the like elision when placed after a word that ends in a vowel; as by't for by it, do't for do it; or that ends in a consonant after which the letter _t_ can be pronounced; as was't for was it, in't for in it, and the like. But this is not so frequent in heroic verse.
The particle _is_ may lose its _i_ after any word that ends in a vowel, or in any of the consonants after which the letter _s_ may be sounded; as she's for she is, the air's for the air is, &c.
To (sign of the infinitive mood) may lose its _o_ before any verb that begins with a vowel; as t'maze, t'undo, &c.
To (sign of the dative case) may likewise lose its _o_ before any noun that begins with a vowel; as t'air, t'every, &c. But this elision is not so allowable as the former.
Are may lose its _a_ after the pronouns personal, we, you, they; as we're, you're, they're. And thus it is that this elision ought to be made, and not, as some do, by cutting off the final vowels of the pronouns personal, w'are, y'are, th'are.
Will and would may lose all their first letters, and retain only their final one, after any of the pronouns personal; as I'll for I will, he'd for he would; or after who, who'll for who will, who'd for who would.
Have may lose its two first letters after I, you, we, they; as I've, you've, we've, they've.
Not, its two first letters after can; as can't for cannot.
Am, its _a_ after _i_; I'm for I am.
Us, its _u_ after let; let's for let us.
Taken, its _k_, ta'en; for so it ought to be written, not ta'ne.
Heaven, seven, even, eleven, and the participles driven, given, thriven, and their compounds, may lose their last vowel; as heav'n, forgiv'n, &c. See the foregoing section.
To these may be added, bow'r, pow'r, flow'r, tow'r, show'r, for bower, tower, &c.
Never, ever, over, may lose their _v_, and are contracted thus, ne'er, e'er, o'er.
Some words admit of an elision of their first syllable; as 'tween, 'twixt, 'mong, 'mongst, 'gainst, 'bove, 'cause, 'fore, for between, betwixt, among, amongst, against, above, because, before, and some others that may be observed in reading our poets.
I have already, in the third section of this chapter, spoken of the elision of the _e_ of the particle the before vowels; but it is requisite likewise to take notice, that it sometimes loses its vowel before a word that begins with a consonant, and then its two remaining letters are joined to the preceding word; as to th' wall for to the wall, by th' wall for by the wall, &c., but this is scarcely allowable in heroic poetry.
The particles in, of, and on, sometimes lose their consonants, and are joined to the particle the in like manner, as i'th', o'th', for in the, of the.
In some of our poets we find the pronoun his loses its two first letters after any word that ends in a vowel; as to's, by's, &c., for to his, by his, &c.; or after many words that end in a consonant, after which the letter _s_ can be pronounced; as in's, for's, for in his, for his, &c. This is frequent in Cowley, who often takes too great liberty in his contractions; as t'your for to your, t'which for to which, and many others; in which we must be cautious in following his example, but the contracting of the pronoun his in the manner I mentioned is not wholly to be condemned.
We sometimes find the word who contracted before words that begin with a vowel; as,
"Wh' expose to Scorn and Hate both them and it."—_Cowley._
And the preposition in like manner; as,
"B' unequal Fate and Providence's Crime."—_Dryden._
"Well did he know how Palms b' Oppression speed."—_Cowley._
And the pronouns personal, he, she, they, we; as,
"Timely h' obeys her wise Advice, and strait
To unjust Force sh' opposes just Deceit."—_Cowley._
"Themselves at first against themselves th' excite."—_Cowley._
"Shame and Woe to us, if w' our Wealth obey."—_Cowley._
But these and the like contractions are very rare in our most correct poets, and indeed ought wholly to be avoided, for 'tis a general rule that no vowel can be cut off before another, when it cannot be sunk in the pronunciation of it: and therefore we ought to take care never to place a word that begins with a vowel after a word that ends in one (mute _e_ only excepted), unless the final vowel of the former can be lost in its pronunciation, for to leave two vowels opening on each other, causes a very disagreeable hiatus. Whenever therefore a vowel ends a word, the next ought to begin with a consonant, or what is equivalent to it; as our _w_ and _h_ aspirate plainly are.
For which reason it is a fault in some of our poets to cut off the _e_ of the particle the; for example, before a word that begins by an _h_ aspirate; as,
"And th' hasty Troops march'd loud and cheerful down."—_Cowley._
But if the _h_ aspirate be followed by another _e_, that of the particle the may be cut off; as,
"Th' Heroick Prince's Courage or his love."—_Waller._
Th' Hesperian Fruit, and made the Dragon sleep."—_Waller._
Comments
Log in to leave a comment.
Practical Guide to English VersificationChapter XVIII: Section V: Of the elisions that are allowed in our versification
0%6 min left in chapter