Chapter IX: Section 285: of the Consolidation Act issue a warrant, and on the

execution of that warrant the doors of any house in the City of New
York may be broken in. If we had time to introduce evidence of cases,
we could do so where from spleen and malice on the part of some common
policeman, the respectable houses have been invaded without colour or
authority of right, except this arbitrary power given to the police by
law.

Senator O’Connor: That is simply a horrible condition of affairs;
better submit to a thousand disorderly houses than that one decent
house should be treated in such a manner.

Mr. Goff: Under the law as it exists to-day in the City of New York, a
policeman who is the Superintendent of Police--that is all he is, a
policeman--has the power to issue his warrant fully equal to that
exercised by the Prefect of Police in St. Petersburg....

Counsel then read as follows:--

“If any member of the police force, or if any two or more
householders, shall report in writing under his or their signature, to
the Superintendent of Police that there are good grounds, and state
them, for believing any house, room or premises within the said city
to be kept or used as a common gaming-house or common gaming premises
or room for playing for wagers, or for money at any game of chance, or
to be kept or used for lewd and obscene purposes or amusements, or the
deposit or sale of lottery tickets or lottery policies, it shall be
lawful for the Superintendent of Police to authorise in writing any
member or members of the police force to enter the same, who may
forthwith arrest all persons there found offending against the law,
but none other, and seize all implements of game or lottery tickets or
lottery policies and convey any person so arrested before a magistrate
and bring the article so seized to the office of the clerk; it shall
be the duty of the said Superintendent of Police to cause such
arrested person to be rigorously prosecuted and such articles seized
to be destroyed as the orders, rules and regulations of the Board of
Police shall direct.”

There has been no law in our country under our system of a more
complete, sweeping and comprehensive measure placed within the powers
of a simple executive office, as the Superintendent of Police is, as
this law. It exceeds that of the Common Law, where the power is vested
in a judicial officer to issue a warrant; but here a policeman may
authorise in writing any members of his police force to enter any
place complained of by either a member of the police force or by two
householders, and arrest all such persons found therein.--Vol. iv.,
4,493-7.

Notwithstanding this right of domiciliary visitation, which equals or exceeds that possessed by the Prefect of St. Petersburg, we have it admitted on all hands that it utterly failed in attaining its end. The police machine, Mr. Goff declared, was by no means inefficient. Regarded as a machine it was indeed, in his opinion, the most perfect machine ever invented in New York. Notwithstanding all its mechanical perfection the result was nothing but organised impotence.

Witness after witness appeared on the stand to attest the extraordinary inability of the police authorities to cope with the flagrant evils in the city or in the force under their command. On one occasion it was proved that the agents of the Society for the Prevention of Crime had been hunted by a mob of bullies and crooks for half a mile through Bowery. It was a regular riot, in which the agents for the Society were struck and stoned through the whole of Captain Devery’s precinct; the police officers looking on as amused spectators. They were appealed to for assistance, and took no notice. At last, the hunted men jumped on a car, and escaped with their lives. But although this riot had taken place in the heart of the city, and created a scandal through the whole of New York, Superintendent Byrnes reported that he could not find any evidence that there had been a riot (p. 4,834.) The extraordinary inability of the police to see what was going on under their noses, although apparently phenomenal, was so habitual that it ceased to excite any surprise. Saloons ran open all Sunday under the eyes of the patrolmen. The Superintendent of the Society for the Prevention of Crime gave evidence on this subject as follows:--

I pointed out an open saloon to a patrolman, whose name I do not know,
and inquired why he did not close it; he said that if I insisted upon
it, he supposed he must do so; but it would do no good, and only get
him in trouble with the department and cause his removal to some
undesirable precinct.--Vol. v., p. 4,835.

But it is only when the Police Commissioners, who stand at the head of the whole force, are under examination that we discover the extent of their utter inability to find out anything. There was, for instance, Mr. Sheehan, who at that time was Police Commissioner, and who now is the titular Boss of Tammany Hall. The question of pool-rooms was under consideration when he admitted that they existed, and that he knew they were corrupting the police. Then the Chairman put the following question:--

And, notwithstanding the fact that you knew or had heard that those
pool-rooms were corrupting the police, you thought it was not
necessary to take any action upon it?

Mr. Sheehan replied:--

I did start an inquiry to find out if those pool-rooms were paying,
what they were paying, and who they were paying it to. I did that
within a few months after I became a Police Commissioner, but I
couldn’t get any authoritative information of any kind on the subject;
but I got it from all sides that they were paying, and it was
believed that they were, but no person would substantiate or stand for
it.--Vol. iv., p. 3,765.

So he abandoned the subject as one which it was no use discussing any further.

It was just the same with Mr. Commissioner Martin. He was asked concerning the existence of corruption in the police force. I quote the following from the Record:--

Examined by Mr. Sutherland: What did you do to restore the tone and
efficiency of the police?

A. The Board of Police was waiting for any evidence of that character
to be brought to it.--Vol. i., p. 483.

Q. What investigation has the Police Commissioners ever instituted to
discover the falsity of those charges?

A. No special investigation.--Vol. i., p. 484.

It was the same thing with disorderly houses.

Examined by Mr. Nicoll: And, during all the years you have been Police
Commissioner, you never have examined the record to see how many there
are or where they are located?

A. No, sir; I have not.

Q. And hasn’t that led you to go to these records to see what houses
were put down as disorderly in this category?

A. No, sir; I have not.

Q. Has the subject of suppression or diminution of these disorderly
houses been a matter of discussion before the Board of Police?

A. No, sir.--Vol. i., p. 528.

Even when crime was discovered, when the criminal was, as it were, taken red-handed, there seemed to be a strange paralysis that prevented his appearance in court. This affected other Boards besides that of the Police. When the action of the Excise Board was under consideration, it was admitted by Mr. Andrews, a Commissioner of the Board, that in one notorious case the licence had been obtained by false swearing. Mr. Goff asked:--

Q. Did you ever, when you discovered these false papers, as you say,
and of perjuries having been committed before the Board--did you ever
take any steps to have the perpetrators called to answer for the
crime?

A. No steps were ever taken for indictment; no.--Vol. iv., p. 4,386.

It was not for want of painstaking on the part of the Legislature that the police force was not more efficient. Every constable before being appointed had to comply with the provisions of the Civil Service law, which were thus explained by Commissioner Martin:--

The candidate is required to have the names of a certain number of
citizens, usually five, to vouch for him as to his character--their
acquaintance with him; and all those papers having been finally
completed, the papers are sent to the Civil Service Board, where
examinations are held from time to time of batches of such applicants.
Application is made to the captain for examination of his character
and as to the persons who signed the paper, and a report is made in
writing by the captain. There are three Civil Service Commissioners
appointed by the Mayor; I do not recollect the names just at this
time. Once a year the Civil Service Board made an examination of all
applicants for patrolmen, and they usually examine in batches of from
400 to 600.--Vol. i., p. 567.

The Commissioners themselves, when asked about the subject, were at a loss to explain how it was vice and crime flourished under their very eyes. Mr. John McClave, the Republican Police Commissioner, told the Committee that he had always voted with his Tammany Commissioners on the Board, because “he had never known them to do anything wrong.” There was a very touching little scene described by Mr. McClave’s son-in-law, as to the grief which the appointment of the Lexow Committee occasioned Mr. McClave. Mr. and Mrs. McClave were going to a reception one night, and, said Mr. Gideon Granger, the son-in-law--

Mr. McClave was quite nervous, and Mrs. McClave turned to him and
said, “Why, Johnnie, what is the matter with you?” And he says, “Oh,
nothing, nothing.” And she says, “Oh yes, there is; it is that police
investigation business. I would not worry over that.” And he said, “I
don’t see why it is those hayseed politicians up in Albany want to
come down here and bother us honest men.”--Vol. i., p. 1,162.

Notwithstanding Mr. McClave’s pathetic lament, the Lexow Committee went on with its work, and the conduct of these “honest men” was brought forth to the light of day. With results.