Sir Walter Scott as a Critic of Literature
by OpenStories
Original author: Margaret Ball
"Sir Walter Scott as a Critic of Literature" by Margaret Ball is a scholarly examination of the critical contributions of Sir Walter Scott, written in the early 20th century. This work delves deeply into Scott's literary career, parsing his roles as an editor and critic, as well as the interplay between his critical and creative faculties. It aims to shed light on how Scott's extensive critical writings have been overshadowed by his success as a novelist and poet, thereby providing a comprehensive overview of his influence on literature. The opening of the text sets the stage for a thorough investigation into Scott's underappreciated critical work, positing that understanding his criticism is essential for a complete grasp of his literary genius. Ball outlines Scott's qualifications as a critic, emphasizing his broad reading, scholarly rigor, and historical knowledge that informed his literary judgments. The introductory chapter hints at the structure of the book, indicating that subsequent sections will explore Scott's views on various literary forms, including his work on mediaeval literature and drama, and will articulate the significant connections between his critical and fictional writings. Overall, it presents an assertion of the importance of Scott's criticism not just in relation to his contemporaries but also to current literary discourse.
Sir Walter Scott as a Critic of Literature, by Margaret Ball. Republished by OpenStories from Project Gutenberg eBook #16715.
- 69,534words
- 17chapters
- 0stars
- 0bookmarks
- 3hits
17 Chapters
- 1.Preface333 words
- 2.Chapter VI: Scott's Position as Critic 134319 words
- 3.Introduction2,383 words
- 4.Chapter II: Scott's Qualifications as Critic2,440 words
- 5.Chapter III: Scott's Work as Student and Editor in the Field of Literary History (1)8,676 words
- 6.Chapter III: Scott's Work as Student and Editor in the Field of Literary History (2)8,769 words
- 7.Chapter III: Scott's Work as Student and Editor in the Field of Literary History (3)899 words
- 8.Chapter IV: Scott's Criticism of His Contemporaries7,254 words
- 9.Chapter V: Scott as a Critic of His Own Work8,168 words
- 10.Chapter VI: Scott's Position as Critic4,336 words
- 11.Appendix: I6,685 words
- 12.Chapter I: contains a letter written by Scott in the original331 words
- 13.Appendix: II (1)8,432 words
- 14.Appendix: II (2)8,065 words
- 15.Appendix: II (3)972 words
- 16.Act I: , Sc. 21,216 words
- 17.Chapter 11: ) From the definitions of Whig and Tory given in the Tales256 words