Chapter XIX: The Work of the Theatre

In 1887 my friend Mr. Beerbohm Tree, who had already won considerable distinction as an actor, decided to enter upon the management of a London theatre, and he asked me to associate myself with the enterprise.

The play chosen for his first venture was _The Red Lamp_ by Outram Tristram, and it is an evidence of some element of strength and distinction in the work that it still survives, after a lapse of twenty-one years, as an integral part of Mr. Tree’s repertoire. At the first it looked very much as though it had but little chance to survive at all. Coldly received by the Press, it failed during the first days of its run to attract the notice of the public; but little by little the audiences grew in numbers, and as the season advanced the house was crowded night after night by an eager and enthusiastic public.

With the close of the season Mr. Tree shifted his quarters to the Haymarket, and there it still served him as his opening production while more important work was in preparation. Those early days of managerial experiences have left many pleasant recollections. We were both of us new at our task, and both unshaken in our faith in the readiness of the public to welcome every form of serious drama.

My alliance with Mr. Tree endured for some little time after his removal to the Haymarket, and it was not until two years later that, at the invitation of my friend Mr. Stuart Ogilvie, I undertook the independent direction of the Comedy Theatre.

Among the writers with whom I was brought into contact during my term of management was the late Robert Buchanan, a man who undoubtedly possessed a remarkable talent, but who very often, from a certain indolence of nature, did himself less than justice. I had met him first at the Haymarket, where he had prepared a version of Daudet’s famous story of _Froment Jeune et Risler Ainé_ for production on the stage, and I confess at that time I was not prepossessed in his favour. It was impossible at first to shake off the prejudice created by that unfortunate article wherein, under an assumed name, he had attacked his brother poets; nor indeed could that particular incident in his career ever be in any way excused.

But I found in my later knowledge of him that he could boast of other and better qualities than were exhibited here. A measure of poetic fancy he had always possessed, a fancy very happily illustrated in the little musical piece founded upon the story of _The Pied Piper of Hamelin_ produced under my management; but even there his better gifts suffered from a lack of persistence in working out the theme under his hand. And so it was with all that Buchanan accomplished. Sometimes a brilliantly written scene would be followed and robbed of its effect by work that was only perfunctory.

He had a sense of the stage, but he had never been at the pains fully to master the conditions of the theatre, so that even in the best that he accomplished he could not make full use of its resources or duly observe its limitations.

It was during the period of my association with the Comedy Theatre that Irving invited me to write for him a play on the subject of King Arthur. He had already in his possession a drama by W. G. Wills upon the same theme, and at first the project took the form of an offer on his part that I should revise, and in part rewrite, Wills’s somewhat slovenly essay. But when I tried to set myself to the task I found that, for me at least, it was impossible of achievement. I had long known and loved the Arthurian legends as they are enshrined in Sir Thomas Malory’s exquisite romance, and it seemed to me that the tragedy that lay in the loves of Lancelot and Guinevere was susceptible of more dramatic treatment than Wills had accorded it. When I explained my difficulty to Irving he at once gave to his original proposal a new form, permitting me very willingly to abandon altogether Wills’s experiment and to write for him a drama of my own.

When the time approached for its production he eagerly acquiesced, as I have already related, in my suggestion that Burne-Jones should be invited to design the scenery and costumes, and it was further agreed between us that the music, which was destined to form an important feature in the presentation of the piece, should be entrusted to Sir Arthur Sullivan.

Sullivan was already counted among my intimate friends. I had met him first many years before at Sir Coutts Lindsay’s country-house in Scotland, and it was not long before the acquaintance ripened into a close and lasting friendship. To those who knew and loved Sullivan, and I think he was loved by all who knew him, the extraordinary charm of his personality will be unreservedly acknowledged.

There have been few men in our time in any walk of life who have possessed an equal measure of social fascination. His manner, always sympathetic and sincere, suffered no change in whatever company he found himself, and there was added to this finer quality of sympathy a quick and delicate sense of humour that made closer comradeship with him inspiring and delightful. And although he was well entitled to claim a separate consideration for the art to which his whole life was unsparingly devoted, it was wonderful to observe with what patience and tact he subordinated any distinctive claim which I have known other musicians, not so finely endowed, often to assert, and with how much skilful readiness he could adjust the competing requirements of music and the drama, when they had to be linked together, so as to produce a combined effect upon the audience.

The subject of King Arthur, while the production was in progress at the Lyceum, took a strong hold upon him, and it was only a very little while before his death that he made a proposition to me that I should so far rearrange the material I had treated as to provide a libretto for an opera he had in his mind to compose.

_Emery Walker_

SIR ARTHUR SULLIVAN

From the painting by Sir J. E. MILLAIS, Bart., P.R.A., in the National Portrait Gallery.

_To face page 284._ ]

It was some little time after the Lyceum production that I became even more closely associated with him in the production of _The Beauty Stone_. The book was written by Mr. Pinero and myself, and Sir Arthur Sullivan was the composer. During a part of that time he occupied a charming little villa at Beaulieu on the Riviera, and there I stayed with him for six weeks while he was setting some of the more important of the lyrics in the opera.

The near neighbourhood of Monte Carlo presented an element of temptation to Sullivan, who was a born gambler. But he was at the time so hard set upon his work that he announced to me on my arrival his fixed resolve that our visits to the Casino should be strictly limited to two days in the week. Like all born gamblers Arthur had his peculiar superstitions. He could not endure to be watched while he was playing; and if he chanced to catch sight of me anywhere near the table at which he was seated, his resentment found eloquent expression. It was only when I contrived to keep entirely out of sight that I was able to observe him as he sat wholly absorbed in the play. The excitement to which he yielded on these occasions was extraordinary, and the rapidity with which he covered the series of chosen numbers very often outran his own remembrance of what he had done.

I have seen him, as he passed from one table to the other, followed by a friendly croupier carrying a handful of gold which he himself was ignorant he had won. And when the evening closed, and we found ourselves once more in the train that was to take us back to Beaulieu, he would sometimes sink back entirely exhausted with the energy he had expended in his three hours’ traffic in the rooms.

Our life at Beaulieu, wholly delightful as it was--for there never was a host to equal him in simple and graceful hospitality--had nevertheless its humorous aspects. We lived, indeed, a sort of Box and Cox existence. The brisk air and bright climate tempted me to rise early, and I was generally at work on the little terrace outside my room by nine o’clock in the morning. It was Sullivan’s habit, on the other hand, to lie late, and our first meeting of the day occurred only at lunch-time. Sometimes, but not always, he would work a little during the afternoon, but it was only when dinner was over, and we had played a few games of bezique, that he set himself seriously to his task. We parted generally at about eleven, and then Arthur’s musical day began. Withdrawing himself into a little glass conservatory that overlooked the Mediterranean, he would often remain at his desk, scoring and composing, till four or even five o’clock in the morning, and it was only rarely during the labour of composition that he had any need to have recourse to the piano to try over a few notes of the melody he had under treatment.

His actual pen-work when he was engaged in scoring his composition for the orchestra was of surprising neatness and delicacy, and I think it was this part of his task he enjoyed the most. He used to say to me that the invention of melody rarely presented to him any grave difficulty. It flowed naturally, almost spontaneously, when he had once fixed the musical rhythm which he felt the meaning of the words and the chosen metre of the verse rightly demanded. Here he took extraordinary pains to satisfy himself, and it was, I think, this spirit of exacting loyalty to the special quality of each separate lyric that gave to his work its special value in relation to the theatre.

Sullivan was always anxious to gather any hint or suggestion from the writer with whom he was associated. I told him one day that in composing verse that was to be set to music I always had some dumb tune echoing in my brain, and I can recall now his futile endeavours to extract from me even the vaguest idea of what this “unheard melody” might be. Sometimes in a spirit of pure mischief he would see how far he could impose upon my confessed ignorance of the musician’s art. He invited me one day to his rooms in Victoria Street to listen to the musical form he proposed to adopt in setting the final choruses of _King Arthur_, and when, after playing over what he would himself have described as a “tinpot melody,” he inquired if the result came up to my expectation, the imperturbable gravity of his face entirely deceived me.

“Well, my dear Arthur,” I replied, “if that is what you propose, I can only assume that one of us two is a vulgar fellow, and I suppose I am the culprit.”

And then, with a twinkle in his eye, he said, “Well, perhaps you prefer this,” and proceeded to play the melody he had really composed for the purpose.

Unhappily, during the time that _The Beauty Stone_ was being composed, poor Sullivan was often suffering great physical pain, which sometimes rendered his task difficult and onerous. And yet even then the natural brightness of his disposition constantly asserted itself, and he rarely allowed others to be conscious of what he himself endured. How great was the strain illness cast upon him became painfully apparent during the period of our rehearsals; for, although he never spared himself, it was clear to those who were near him that the cost to himself in nervous exhaustion was often almost more than he could bear.

Those who followed his body to St. Paul’s will not easily forget the touching solemnity of the occasion. His own Chorus from the Savoy was permitted to sing one of his own beautiful compositions as the coffin was slowly lowered into the vault. That so beautiful and sunny a nature, rich in all the qualities that make for sweet friendship, and so nobly endowed with gifts that leave his place as a musician lasting and secure, should have been consigned to such martyrdom of physical suffering ranks among those decrees of fate that it is vain to question and idle to seek to evade. Few men could boast of having conferred upon their generation such fresh and lasting enjoyment; for it may be confidently said that, in that long series of works in which his name will ever be associated with that of Sir William Gilbert, there was added to the garnered store of the world’s pure pleasure a new harvest of delight reaped from a field that none had tilled before.

To those who love the theatre the labours of rehearsal, though they are exacting and sometimes exhausting, yield many delightful experiences. There comes a moment even in the writing of a play when the puppets of the author’s invention seem suddenly to take a detached existence and to follow a law of development that is only half-consciously dictated by their creator. This impression, which I suppose nearly all writers in the region of fiction must have felt, is renewed and intensified as a play takes shape upon the stage. The intrusion of the actor’s personality, sometimes enhancing the original conception, and always in some degree modifying the intended balance of the design, adds a new colour to the written page. And then, as day by day the scattered fragments are gradually united and the interpretation grows in emotional strength, there come moments of keen enjoyment of the actor’s art that equal, if they do not surpass, any later impression that may be yielded when the performance is finally presented with the added effects of costume and scenery.

The bare, empty stage, with the players in their ordinary working-day dress, presents but a mournful appearance to a chance visitor who is a stranger to the scene. But those who work day by day in the theatre sometimes find, as the rehearsals advance, that this ill-lit, unfurnished void can on a sudden be transformed into a world of enchantment. The actor and the author together are as yet undisturbed in their task, and what is still to come in the way of added illusion their imagination can readily supply.

And yet the bringing together of all the contributory arts that are combined in the service of an important production has an interest of its own. From the initial step, when the little toy models of the scenic artist are passed and approved, to the final moment of the dress rehearsal, there is a vast amount of work to be done in every department, and during the progress of that work the theatre becomes a truly democratic institution. Author and composer, the master carpenter, the property master, and the electrician are linked together in a spirit of equal comradeship, and there is not one of them all who has it not in his power to make or mar the work of his fellows.

It is one of the inscrutable laws of the theatre that nothing is ever quite ready until the last moment. Costumes are delayed, properties are incomplete, or it may be some scene that did not quite fit its purpose is undergoing structural amendment, and has yet to receive the final touches at the hands of the scene-painter. All these circumstances, perhaps inevitable in view of the countless details that have to be fitted together in order to perfect the complex puzzles of a production, are apt to give to the final rehearsals an impression of chaos and confusion. It is not an uncommon remark made by those who are admitted to such rehearsals, “But you surely do not intend to produce this play in two days’ time?” And, except to the expert who knows that what is lacking is already in an advanced stage of preparation, the doubt implied in the question is natural enough.

But even with all the experience of the expert there are occasions when these inevitable delays approach very nearly to disaster. I remember that the dress rehearsal of _Called Back_, when I had not yet gained a full mastery over the mechanical resources of the theatre, lasted till six o’clock in the morning, and during the small hours one after another of the members of the company came to me and implored that the production might be postponed. But with an audacity that was born of inexperience I persisted that all would be ready in time. We left the theatre at half-past six, and were back again at ten o’clock to renew the rehearsal, and to the astonishment of all,--an astonishment in which I confess I shared,--when the evening came, the play went without mishap to a successful close. But these long rehearsals often result in trials of temper as well as of strength, and now and again it happens that the wearied stagehands are not wholly equal to their work.

_King Arthur_ was produced under conditions that were exceptionally trying, for, at the time that the heavy scenic material had to be arranged upon the stage, a pantomime was running at the theatre during the afternoons. Much that was employed in the pantomime had to be daily removed to make room for our own scenery, and replaced again for the performance of the next afternoon. At one of the rehearsals, as Arthur Sullivan and I stood upon the stage listening to his setting of the “May Song,” the high platform upon which Queen Guinevere and her maids were standing suddenly gave way, and to our horror fell with a crash to the stage. For the moment we thought that some grave disaster must have occurred, but with sudden instinct Miss Terry had flung herself prone upon the pedestal where she had been standing, and escaped with nothing more serious than a few bruises.

The protest against scenic display in the theatre is constantly renewed, but is not always very intelligently directed. That scenery can be inappropriate in its magnificence is true enough, but it is not less true that it can be equally inappropriate in its inefficiency. The question, when all is said, is one of taste and fitness, and involves no irrefutable principle.

To ignore the enlarged resources of the modern scene-painter’s art would, I think, be foolish, even if it were possible. The problem before the theatre now is to control these resources, and to reconsider and to reforge the means which shall set them again in clear subjugation to the essential claims of the drama. It may be conceded that during the last thirty years the need of this subjugation has not always been sufficiently borne in mind, and there have been instances not a few where the eye has been fed at the expense of the ear. But this scenic art is a thing so beautiful in itself that it would be hard indeed if any mere pedantry of taste should force its exclusion from the theatre.

INDEX

Abbey, Edwin, 150

Academy, Royal, 59, 94, 106-7, 143, 146, 245;
school of the, 109;
duties of the, 127-30

Actors’ Benevolent Fund, 189-90

Adelphi, the, 231

Adelphi Hotel, Liverpool, 50

Albany, the, 37

Albemarle Hotel, 259

Albert, Prince Consort, 129

Albery, Mr., 230

Albion Tavern, Drury Lane, 233-35

Algiers, 103-5

Alverstone, Lord, 186-88

American ambassadors, orators among the, 189

Amiens, 154

Aquarium, the, 78

Armstrong, Lord, 50

Armstrong, Thomas, 120

Arnold, Arthur, 28, 35

Arnold, Sir Edwin, 28

Arrowsmith, Messrs., 255

_Art Journal_, the, 146-49

Arts, relation of the, 210-14

Arts Club, the, 35, 85, 94, 114, 116, 123, 151, 152

Aspinall, Mr., 56

_Athenæum_, the, 29

Atkinson, 15

Ayrton, Mr., 174

Bancroft, Lady, 233, 261

Bancroft, Sir Squire, 259

Barnes Common, 1-2

Barnum’s Show, 78

Barrère, Camille, 35-36

Barry, 75

Bateman, Dick, 228-29, 232

Bateman, Isabella, 229, 230

Bateman, Richard, 228-35, 254

Bayard, Mr., speech of, 189-91

Beaconsfield, Earl, attack on Mr. Gladstone, 176-78;
visits to the Grosvenor, 179-80;
anecdote concerning, 180-81;
personality, 181-82;
style of oratory, 182-83

Beatty-Kingston, William, 42, 44-46

Beaulieu, 285-86

Beefsteak Club, the, 122, 255, 259

Beefsteak Room of the Lyceum, 241, 270

Beere, Mrs. Bernard, 195

Belt trial, the, 51-52

Bernhardt, Sarah, 239, 275, 279-80

Bigham, Lord Justice, 49

Billingsgate, 249

Birmingham University, 33

_Black and White_, 65

Blake, 74-75

Blandford Square, 121, 255

Bodichon, Madam, 103-4

Book illustration, 109-10

Botticelli, 67, 72, 74

Boughton, G. H., 266

Bow Street, 187

Box Hill, 206

Braid, Mr., 8

Brice, Prof. Stewart, 48

Bright, John, 168-75;
speeches on the Reform movement, 170-72;
impromptu speeches, 173-74;
his allusion to the “Scottish terrier,” 174-75;
Millais’s portrait, 175

British Museum, the, 109, 245

Brontës, the, 11

Brookfield, Charles, 215

Brown, Ford Madox, 63, 130

Browning, Robert, 10, 86, 204, 266;
poetry of, 199-201;
personality, 201-7;
Browning senr., 203

Bruce Castle School, 3-9, 38-39, 228

Bruce, Edgar, 255-56

Buchanan, Robert, 282-83

Burke, Mr., murder of, 267

Burne-Jones, Sir Edward, 8, 74, 85, 117, 130, 132, 210, 267, 283;
Rossetti on, 67, 69-70;
letter _quoted_, 71-72, 82;
the pre-Raphaelite movement, 76;
pen-sketches, 78-79;
essays in the grotesque, 79-80;
personality, 80-82

Buyers, modern, 131-32

Byron, Lord, 181

Café Royal, the, 115, 157-58

Calais, 153

Caldecott, Randolph, 120-21

Callander, 16-17

Cameron, Henry, 193, 198

Cameron, Mrs., 193, 194, 197

Campden Hill, 266

Canning, policy, 177

Caracci, the, 180

Carlyle, 11, 195

Carr, Mr. J. Comyns--boyhood, 1-13;
in the City, 13-14;
idle hours, 15-25;
Junior of the Northern Circuit, 48-58;
theatre management, 281-92;
Journalistic work--_Dramatic and Musical Review_, 26-28;
_Echo_, 28, 35;
_Globe_, 28-36, 38, 59, 68, 264;
_Pall Mall Gazette_, 35, 36, 102, 146;
“Ignotus” articles, 63-64, 71;
_Saturday Review_, 36, 38, 59, 206, 215;
_Examiner_, 36, 38, 46-47, 59;
_World_, 36, 38;
_Manchester Guardian_, 38, 146, 150, 153;
editor of the _English Illustrated Magazine_, 40, 118, 158-65, 257;
English editor of _L’Art_, 140, 146;
_Art Journal_, 146-47, 149;
_Academy_, 150;
_Portfolio_, 149
Dramatic work--_King Arthur_, 83-84, 279, 284, 287, 291-92;
_Called Back_, 255-56;
_Dark Days_, 256;
_The United Pair_, 257;
_The Beauty Stone_, 285, 287-88;
contributions to the performances at St. George’s Hall, 257-58

Carr, Mrs. J. Comyns, _North Italian Folk_, 120

Cavendish, Lord Frederick, 267

Chalons, 72

Chamberlain, Mr., 152;
Mr. Parnell’s attack on, 185-86

Cheyne Walk, Rossetti’s home, 65, 69;
Whistler’s home, 135, 136, 141, 142

Child, Mr., 152-53

Choate, Mr., 189

Churchill, Lord Randolph, 240-41

Cleveland, President, the Venezuelan crisis, 189-90

Coal Hole, the, 33

Coleridge, Lord, 56

Collins, Lord Justice, 49

Collins, Prof. Churton, 33-34, 229

Cologne, 243;
Custom House, 120

_Cologne Gazette_, 265

Colvin, Prof. Sidney, 36, 102

Comedy Theatre, 160, 282, 283

Constable, 91

Continental Hotel, 271

Conway, Hugh, _The Family Affair_, 162;
_Called Back_, 255-56;
personality, 257

Cook, Dutton, 231

Cook, Mr., 37

Coquelin, 279

_Cornhill Magazine_, the, 9-10, 29, 95, 110

Correspondents, special, 39-47

Corry, Montague (Lord Rowton), 267

Cotton, Mrs., prosecution of, 56-57

Crane, Walter, 161

Craven, Hawes, 84, 243

Crawford, Marion, 159

Creighton, Bishop, 47

Crimean remembrances, 3

Croizette, 279

Crompton, Charles, 48, 57

Cumberland, fishing in, 21-22;
walking tours, 24-25

Custom House, the, 249

_Daily News_, the, 40-41

_Daily Telegraph_, the, 28, 43

Daudet, 282

_Débâts_, the, 157

Delane, Mr., 277

Delaunay, 278

Delmas, M., 4

Desclée, 239

Design, renewed study in, 111

Dickens, Charles, 9, 11, 77, 89, 137, 205, 223;
“Mr. Pecksniff,” 147;
his likeness to Tennyson, 194;
on Irving, 230

Dilke, Sir Charles, 146

Dochart, Loch, 18

Doyle, Richard, 119-20

_Dramatic and Musical Review_, the, 26

Drury Lane Theatre, 232

Dublin, 240

Dudley Gallery, 121

Duffield, Richard, 215

Dumas, _L’Étrangère_, 279

Dumfries, 251

Dungeon Ghyll, 24

Dungeon Ghyll Hotel, 25

Duse, Madame, 280

Easedale Tarn, 24

Echenique, 6

_Echo_, the, 28, 35

Elgin Marbles, the, 109

Eliot, George, 11

Emerson, 11

_English Illustrated Magazine_, the, 40, 118, 257;
wood-engravings, 158-59;
literary contributors, 159-66

Engraving, renewed study of, 111

Erckmann-Chatrian, 230

_Examiner_, the, 36, 38, 46, 59

Farringford, home of Tennyson, 193, 194, 197

Faulkner, Charles, 8

Fechter, Charles, 232, 273, 274

Fifeshire, 23

Fishing, the Scottish gillie, 18-21;
the art of, 22-23

Fleury, Robert, 97

Florence, school of, 75, 76

Forbes, Archibald, 39-42

Français, Theatre, 245

Francillon, the novelist, 29-33

Franco-German War, 40, 157, 278

Freshwater, 193

Froude, 11

Fuseli, 75

Gaiety Restaurant, the old, 30, 259

Gaiety Theatre, the, 229, 232, 246

Gainsborough, 93

Gallery of Illustration, Regent Street, 258

Gambetta, 35

Garrick Club, the, 90, 164, 183, 184

Garrison, William Lloyd, 170

Gauthiot, M., 157-58

George III., 128

German Reeds, the, 121, 257-59

Gilbert, Sir John, 109, 119

Gilbert, Sir William, 53-54, 288

Giorgione, 180

Giotto, 73

Gladstone, W. E., 190;
Burne-Jones on, 76;
Millais’s portrait, 175;
style of oratory, 175-76;
his reply to Disraeli’s attack _quoted_, 176-78;
visits to the Grosvenor, 178-79;
his treatment of Parnell, 188

Glasgow, 255

Glebe Place, 143

Glenesk, Lord, 20

Glenmuick, 20

_Globe_, the, the author’s work as dramatic critic, 28-38, 59, 68, 264;
“Ignotus” articles, 63, 71

Got, 278

Gothard Pass, 21

Grain, Corney, 258-59

Grange, the, home of Burne-Jones, 73, 83

Granville, Dr. Mortimer, 28

Grasmere, 16, 24

Great Russell Street, 45

Greenwood, Frederic, 36-37

Grosvenor Gallery, establishment, 65, 127, 129-32, 266, 268-69;
exhibitions, 76, 89-90, 120, 133, 143, 146, 178-80, 198;
Millais’s works, 89-90

Grove End Road, house of Sir L. Tadema, 267-68

Gully, _see_ Selby, Viscount

Gurney, Overend, 12

Guy Fawkes, 2

Hake, George, 64

Hall, Mrs., 147-48

Hall, Samuel Carter (“Mr. Pecksniff”), 146-49

Hallé, Sir Charles E., 89, 126, 132, 146

Hamerton, Philip, 149-50

Hamilton, Lady, 264

Hannen, Mr. Justice, the Parnell trial, 186-88

Harcourt, Sir William, 23, 180-81

Hare, Sir John, 233, 236, 259

Harrop Tarn, 21

Harte, Bret, 159, 223-24

Harwood, Mr., 7, 37-38

Hawtrey, Charles, 256

Haydon, 75

Haymarket Theatre, the, 257, 281-82

Henley, relations with Stevenson, 215, 218-19;
Irving and, 219-21

Henschell, 119

Herschell, Lord, 49, 55-56

Hertfordshire, 23

High White Stones, 24

Hill, Arthur, 3, 5, 6

Hill, Dr. Birkbeck, 6-8, 170

Hill, Sir Rowland, 3

His Majesty’s Theatre, 270

Holker, Lord Justice, 49, 54-55

Hollingshead, John, 232

Home Rule movement, the, 184-85

Hope, Beresford, 37

Horsman, Mr., 174-75

Horton, Miss Priscilla (Mrs. German Reed), 258

Houghton, Lord, 270-71

Howell, Charles, 141-42

Hughenden, 180-81

Hunt, Holman, 75, 111-13, 130

Huxley, Professor, 159

Hyde Park, 170

Ibsen, 208

_Illustrated London News_, the, 97

Indian Mutiny, 2-3

Inglis, Mr., 186

Inner Temple, 14

Irving, Sir Henry, 52, 83, 152, 196;
production of _Becket_, 195-96;
attack on Henley, 219-21;
anecdotes concerning, 221-23, 234-36;
Bob Gassett in _Dearer than Life_, 229;
in _Fanchette_, 230;
Digby Grant in _The Two Roses_, 230, 235-36;
in _The Bells_, 231-34, 239;
personality, 236-38, 241-43, 270-72;
in _Hamlet_, 239-41;
visit to Nuremberg, 243-44;
in _Charles I._, 254;
Ellen Terry and, 279-80;
his request to the author, 283-84

Italy, Northern, aspects of character in, 19

James, Edwin, 167

James, Henry, 159

Jameson, Frederick, 206, 260

Jefferies, Richard, 159;
“The Gamekeeper at Home,” 163-64

Jesmond Dene, 50

Jeune, Sir Francis, _see_ St. Helier, Lord

Jeykell, Miss, 103-5

Johnson, Dr., 7

Jonby, 15

Journalism, relation to literature, 47

Junior of the Circuit, the, 49-50, 56

Keats, 68, 200

Keene, Charles, 118, 244;
sketch of, 114-15

Kelly, Mr., 255

Kelmscott, home of Rossetti, 64

Kennedy, Lord Justice, 49

Kensington Gardens, 90

Killin, 19

Kinsmen Club, the, 223

Knight, Joseph, 264

_Labour News_, the, 27-28

Lambs Club, the, 117, 259-61, 263

Landor, Rossetti on, 68-69

Landseer, Sir Edwin, 72, 88;
personality, 105-7

Langdale Pikes, 24

_L’Art_, 140, 146

_L’Art en Province_, 153

Lawson, Cecil, exhibitions at the Grosvenor, 133, 143;
the “Minister’s Garden,” 143;
the “Pastoral,” 143;
personality, 144-45

Leech, John, 89, 118

Leigh’s School, 109

Leighton, Sir Frederick, 44, 275;
Rossetti on, 67-68;
personality, 93-96;
letter to the author _quoted_, 97-99

Leslie, George, letters to the author _quoted_, 103-7

Lewis, Lady, 79-80, 267

Lewis, Leopold, 230

Lewis, Sir George, 51, 80, 183, 187, 267

Leyland, Mr., 134

Liddon, Canon, 167

Lindsay, Lady, 137, 266-67

Lindsay, Sir Coutts, 119, 132, 143, 146, 266-67, 284

Literature, its relation to music, 211

Locker, Frederick, 198-99

Lockwood, Sir Frank, 190

London University, 14

Louvre, the, 245

Lowe, Mr., M.P., 174-75

Lowell, James Russell, 189

Luib, 18

Lyceum, the, 84, 152, 195, 221, 229, 241, 254, 270, 274, 279, 284

Lynn-Linton, Mrs., 265

M’Connell, Mr., 50, 55

Macfarlane, Mr., 251

Maclure, Macdonald and Macgregor, Messrs., 166

Macmillan, Messrs., 158

Macready, 232

Maidenhead, 117

Malory, Sir Thomas, 83, 283

Manchester Art Gallery, the, 153

_Manchester Guardian_, the, 38, 146, 150, 153

Manor House, Barnes Common, 1-2

Marlborough, Duke of, 240

Marshall, Gen. Henry, 3

Marston, Dr. Westland, 263-65

Martineau, James, preaching of, 167-69

Maurier, M. Du, 114;
personality, 116-17;
work on _Punch_, 117-18;
his love of music, 118-19;
drawing of Frederick Locker, 199

Mecklenburg Square, 43

_Men of the Time_, 97

Meredith, George, 159;
_Evan Harrington_, illustrations, 114;
“The Old Chartist,” illustration, 115;
personality, 205-8;
sonnets on Modern Love, 207;
comment on Ibsen, 208

Michael Angelo, 73, 180

Mill, J. S., 11, 176

Millais, Sir J. E., 63, 75, 116, 138;
Rossetti on, 67, 87;
the author’s early criticism on, 85-86;
the “Carpenter’s Shop,” 86;
“Feast of Lorenzo,” 86;
“The Huguenots,” 86, 90, 92, 93;
“Ophelia,” 86, 92, 93;
personality, 86-89, 90-92, 99-101;
the Grosvenor Gallery exhibitions, 89-90;
his special power, 91-93;
contrasted with Leighton, 93-96;
black and white work, 111-13;
attitude towards the Royal Academy, 130;
portrait of John Bright, 175;
of Gladstone, 175;
of Tennyson, 193;
of Dickens, 194

Miller, Joachim, 264

Millet, Frank, 150

Milton, 200

Minto, Professor, 46-47

Mitre Tavern, Temple Bar, 158

Monnet, 279

Montague, Henry, 234-35

Montague, H. J., 260-61, 273

Monte Carlo, 285

Moore, Albert, 66, 138

Morris, William, 72;
_The Defence of Guinevere_, 10, 208;
poetry of, 208-9;
personality, 209-10

Music, claims of, 210-12

National Gallery, the, 128, 245

Neilson, Adelaide, 264

New Gallery, 126-27, 131-32, 178, 179

Newman, Messrs., 126

North, Mr., 164

Northern Circuit, the, 48-58

Nuremberg, 243

Ogilvie, Mr. Stuart, 282

Old Masters, value of, 131-32

Old Square, Lincoln’s Inn, 41

Oliphant, Lawrence, 159, 164-65

Oliphant, Mrs., “The Lake of Tiberias,” 164-65

_Once a Week_, 107, 110, 113-14, 117

O’Neil, Arthur, 26-28

O’Neil, Henry, 26

Oratory, the art of, 167-92

Orsini, defence of, 167

Oxenford, John, 276-78

Oxford Union Debating Society, 177-78

Pagani’s Italian Restaurant, 121

Palais Royal Theatre, 100

Pall Mall exhibitions, the, 134

_Pall Mall Gazette_, 35, 36, 47, 102, 146, 163, 231

Pall Mall Restaurant, 158

Parnell, C. S., the trial, 186-88;
character, 188;
the forged letter, reply to Mr. Chamberlain, 183-86

Parry, Mr., 258

Parsons, Alfred, 151, 152, 164

Patterdale, 24

Payne, Bernal, 102

Pellegrini, Carlo, 121-25

Penzance, Lord, 49

Perugini, Mrs., 194

Phelps, 232, 244

Pigott, 186, 187

Pinero, _The Beauty Stone_, 285, 287-88

Poe, Edgar Allan, 257

Poetry, music in, 210-12

Poets, some Victorian, 193-214

Pollock, Walter Herries, 37, 215

Pope, Sam, 49, 56

_Portfolio_, the, 149

Power, Richard, 184

Pre-Raphaelites, the, 60, 63, 75-76, 130

Previtale’s, 81

Prince of Wales’s Theatre, 255-56, 261

Princess’s Theatre, 244

_Punch_, 114, 117-18

Purnell, Thomas, 254;
anecdotes concerning, 28-34;
story told by, 147-48

Queen’s Theatre, 229

Rabelais Club, 221

Rachel, Madame, 275

Rae, Mr., of Birkenhead, 63, 65

Raleigh Club, 258

Rannoch, 23

Raphael, 180

Rasselas, mountains of, 182

Reade, Charles, 280

Reed, Alfred, 258

Reform Bill of 1832, 177;
of 1867, 182

Reform, John Bright’s speeches on, 170-75

Restaurants, London, 158

Reynolds, 93

Ristori, Madame, 275-76

Robertson, Tom, 233, 261

Robinson, Sir John, 40-41

Rossetti, Dante Gabriel, 7, 8, 10-11, 60, 72, 75, 85, 115, 117, 130;
the pre-Raphaelite movement, 63, 76;
works of, 64-65;
friendship with the author, 64-70;
expressed opinions of, 66-69, 87;
black and white work, 111, 112;
illustrations for Tennyson’s poems, 112-13;
personality, 264

Rothenberg-on-the-Tauber, 243

Rubens, 80

Ruskin, 11, 60, 113, 138, 141

Russell, Lord, on the Northern Circuit, 49-54, 56-57;
the Parnell trial, 186-88

Russell, Sir William, 39

Sadler’s Wells Theatre, 26, 244

St. George’s Hall, 121, 257-59

St. Helier, Lord, 189

St. James’s Hall, 170, 173, 194

St. Paul’s, burial of Sullivan, 288

Sala, George Augustus, 42-44, 46

Salvini, 275, 278-79

Sandys, Frederick, 114-16

_Saturday Review_, the, 7, 36, 37, 38, 47, 59, 206, 215, 265

Savile Club, the, 215, 219, 223

Savoy, chapel of the, 30

Schlesinger, Dr. Max, 265-66

Scotland, early fishing excursions in, 17-22

Scott, Sir W., 218

Scottish character, some aspects, 17-21, 153-57

Selby, Viscount, 49

Selous, Fred, 4

Severn, Arthur, 121

Shakespeare, 162-63, 200

Shield, Hugh, 55

Simpson’s Restaurant, 158

Skinner, Alan, 41-42, 167

Skinner, Hilary, 41-42

Smith, Prof. Goldwin, 183

Soria, De, 119

South Kensington Museum, 245

Spaniard’s Inn, Highgate, 251

Spurgeon, preaching of, 167-68

Stanley, Dean, 167

Steinle, 97, 98

Stevens, Alfred, 130

Stevenson, R. L., personality, 215-19

Stickle Tarn, 24-25

Stratford-on-Avon, 152

“Student Williams,” 47

Sullivan, Sir Arthur, 283;
_King Arthur_, 283, 287, 291-92;
personality, 284-86;
_The Beauty Stone_, 285, 287-88;
method of work, 286-87;
death, 288

Sully, 279

Swinburne, A. C., 7, 10, 77, 159;
the new music in his poetry, 208-12

Switzerland, 21

Tadema, Lady, 267-68

Tadema, Sir Laurence, 80, 82, 267-68

Taylor, Tom, 193

Tebbs, Mr. Virtue, 66

Tenniel, Sir John, 114

Tennyson, Horatio, 198

Tennyson, Lionel, 198

Tennyson, Lord--_Poems_ (edition 1857), 112-13;
appearance, 193-94;
_The Princess_, 194-95;
_The Promise of May_, 195;
_Becket_, 195, 196;
_The Cup_, 195, 196;
personality, 197-98, 200, 205;
Browning’s admiration for, 204

Terriss, William, 3, 5

Terry, Ellen, visit to Nuremberg, 243-44;
in _Butterfly_, 255;
Sarah Bernhardt’s compliment to, 279;
in _King Arthur_, 291-92

Terry, Kate, 274

Thackeray, W. M., 9-11, 95-96, 110, 205

_The Theatre_, 221

Theatre, the, impressions of childhood, 225-28;
condition of the stage on the advent of Irving, 232;
the actor’s art, 237-49;
need for a national theatre, 244-46;
rehearsals, 288-91;
the question of scenery, 291-92

Thirlemere, 21

Thomson, Hugh, 165-66

Thorne, Tom, 234-35

_Times_, the, 56, 183-84, 276-77

Tissot, James, 268-70

Titian, 180

Toole, J. L., 229-30, 234-35, 250, 254;
friendship with Irving, 241, 246;
personality and anecdotes, 246-53;
a day’s fun, 247-50

Toole’s Theatre, 255

Tottenham Court Road Theatre, 232, 281

Tower of London, visit of Toole, 248-49

Townsend House, 267

“Trafalgar,” Greenwich, 37

Tree, Beerbohm, 256, 270, 281-82

Tristram, Outram, 281

Turner, 66

Ullswater, 15

Unitarian chapel, Great Portland Street, 167, 169

United States, quality of illustrations in, 159

_Vanity Fair_ cartoons, 121, 165

Vaudeville Theatre, 234-35

Venezuela, 189

Verrey’s Restaurant, 158

Vinci, Leonardo da, 180, 245

Walker, Frederick, 114, 144;
personality, 102, 105-7;
visit to Algiers, 103-5;
his work, 107-10

Walking tours, 23-25

Walton, 267

Water-Colour Society, 74

Watts, G. F., 63, 72, 73, 129, 169, 193

Watts-Dunton, Theodore, 47, 159

Webster, _The Duchess of Malfi_, 276

Webster, Sir Richard, _see_ Alverstone, Lord

Westminster Club, the, 254

Westmoreland, fishing in, 21-22;
walking tours, 24-25

Weyman, Stanley, 159-61

Whistler, J. A. M., 114, 115;
criticism of (1873), 133-34;
public attitude, 134-35;
personality 135-38;
style, 138-39;
his love of contest, 139-42;
friends, 142-43;
at Lawson’s, 143

Whymper, T. W., 109

Wilde, Oscar, 118;
poetry of, 212-13;
dramatic work of, 213-14

Wills, W. G., 221-22, 283;
_Charles I._, 254

Wood-engraving, 109-10, 120, 158-59

Wordsworth, 200, 201

_World_, the, 36, 38, 40

Wurtzburg, 243

Yates, Edmund, 147;
founds the _World_, 36, 38-39, 40, 43, 44;
style of oratory, 191-92

_Printed by_ R. & R. CLARK, LIMITED, _Edinburgh_.