Chapter XXVIII: Part II: page ii (3)

[But Dr. Wright, (remarking that in his MSS., which are evidently
the correcter ones, 263/10 stands opposite the middle of ver. 12
[οὐδεὶς ἐτόλμα], and 264/9 opposite ver. 13 [ἔρχεται οὖν],) proceeds
to supply the lacune for me, thus: § 264/9 = ver. 13: § 265/10 =
ver. 14-5 (down to φιλῶ σε; λέγει αυτῷ): § 266/9 = βόσκε τὰ ἀρνία
μου, (end of ver. 15): § 267/10 = ver. 16 (down to φιλῶ σε): § 268/9
= λέγει αὐτῷ, Ποίμαινε τὰ πρόβατα μου (end of ver. 16): § 269/10 =
ver. 17 (down to φιλῶ σε): § 270/9 = λέγει αὐτῷ ὁ Ἰ., β. τὰ π. μου
(end of ver. 17): § 271/10 = ver. 18 to 25.

561 “I have examined for your purposes, Add. 14,449; 14,457; 14,458; and
7,157. The first three are Nos. lxix, lxx, and lxxi, in my own
Catalogue: the last, a Nestorian MS., is No. xiii in the old
Catalogue of Forshall and Rosen (London, 1838). All four agree in
their numeration.”

562 See the preceding note.—Availing myself of the reference given me by
my learned correspondent, I read as follows in the Catalogue:—“Inter
ipsa textus verba, numeris viridi colore pictis, notatur Canon
harmoniae Eusebianae, ad quem quaevis sectio referenda est. Sic,
[glyph] [i.e. 1] indicat canonem in quo omnes Evangelistae
concurrunt,” &c. &c.

563 Suidas [A.D. 980], by giving 236 to S. Mark and 348 to S. Luke,
makes the sum of the Sections in Greek Evangelia 1,171.

564 This sheet was all but out of the printer’s hands when the place in
vol. i. of Assemani’s Bibliotheca Medicea, (fol. 1742,) was shewn me
by my learned friend, P. E. Pusey, Esq., of Ch. Ch.—Dr. Wright had
already most obligingly and satisfactorily resolved my inquiry from
the mutilated fragments of the Canons, as well as of the Epistle to
Carpianus in Add. 17,213 and 14,450.

565 Dr. Tregelles. (_Vide suprà_, pp. 125-6.) And so, Tischendorf.

566 The others are 11, 14, 22, 23, 28, 32, 37, 40, 45, 52, 98, 113, 115,
127, 129, 132, 133, 134, 137, 169, 186, 188, 193, 195, 265, 269,
276, 371. Add. 18,211, Cromwell 15, Wake 12 _and_ 27.

567 The others are 5, 6, 9, 12, 13, 15, 24, 29, 54 [more §§ ?], 65, 68,
111, 112, 114, 118, 157, 183, 190, 202, 263, 268, 270, 273, 277,
278, 284, 287, 294, 414, 438, 439. Rich 7,141. Add. 17,741 _and_
17,982. Cromw. 16. Canonici 36 _and_ 112. Wake 21.

568 Viz. 184, 192, 264, hscr, Add. 11,836. Ti. Wake 29.

569 The others are 10, 20, 21, 36, 49, 187, 262, 266, 300, 364. Rawl.
141.

_ 570 Vide suprà_, p. 33. Assemani, vol. i. p. 28. (Comp. Adler, p. 53.)
The others are 8, 26, 72, 299, 447. Bodl. Miscell. 17. Wake 36.

571 The others are 7, 27, 34, 38, 39, 46, 74, 89, 105, 116, 117, 135,
179, 185, 194, 198, 207, 212, 260, 261, 267, 275, 279, 293, 301,
445, kscr. Add. 22,740. Wake 22, 24, 30; _and_ 31 in which, ver. 20
is numbered CMB.

572 But Cod. U inserts ευθεως before εξηλθεν; and (at least two of the
other Codices, viz.) 48, 67 read αιμα και υσωρ.

573 Σημείωσις is what we call an “Annotation.” [On the sign in the text,
see the Catalogue of MSS. in the Turin Library, P. i. p. 93.] On the
word, and on σημειοῦσθαι, (consider 2 Thess. iii. 14,) see the
interesting remarks of Huet, _Origeniana_, iii. § i. 4. (at the end
of vol. iv. of Origen’s _Opp._ p. 292-3.)—Eusebius (_Hist. Eccl._ v.
20) uses σημείωσις in this sense. (See the note of Valesius.) But it
is plain from the rendering of Jerome and Rufinus (_subscriptio_),
that it often denoted a “signature,” or signing of the name.
Eusebius so employs the word in _lib._ v. 19 _ad fin._

574 He was Patriarch of Antioch, A.D. 512-9.—The extract (made by Petrus
junior, Monophysite Patriarch of Antioch, A.D. 578,) purports to be
derived from the 26th Epistle, (Book 9,) which Severus addressed to
Thomas Bp. of Germanicia after his exile. See Assemani, _Bibl.
Orient._ vol. ii. pp. 81-2.

575 I cannot find the place in Cyril. I suppose it occurs in a lost
Commentary of this Father,—whose Works by the way are miserably
indexed.

576 Ὁ μέντοι γε πρότερος αὐτῶν [viz. the sect of the Severiani] ἀρχηγὸς
ὁ Τατιανὸς συνάφειάν τινα καὶ συναγωγὴν οὐκ οἶδ᾽ ὅπως τῶν εὐαγγελίων
συνθεὶς, τὸ διὰ τεσσάρων τοῦτο προσωνόμασεν. Ὁ καὶ παρά τισιν εἰσέτι
νῦν φέρεται. The next words are every way suggestive. Τοῦ δὲ
ἀποστόλου φασὶ τολμῆσαί τινας αὐτὸν μεταφράσαι φωνὰς, ὡς
ἐπιδιωρθούμενον αὐτῶν τὴν τῆς φράσεως σύνταξιν.—Eusebius, _Hist.
Eccl._ iv. 29, § 4.

577 See, for example, the readings of B or א, or both, specified from p.
80 to p. 86.

_ 578 Vid. suprà_, p. 129, note (g.)

_ 579 Opp._ vol. i. p. 391 D.

_ 580 Haeret. Fab._ lib. i. c. xx. (_Opp._ iv. 208.)

581 Clinton, F. R. ii. _Appendix_, p. 473, quoting Theodoret’s “Ep. 113,
p. 1190. [_al._ vol. iii. p. 986-7].”

_ 582 Quoted by Matthaei, N. T._ (1788) vol. ix. p. 228, _from_ g, a, d.

_ 583 Ibid_., ii. 69, and ix. 228.

_ 584 Nov. Test._ (1869), p. 404.

585 Let the reader examine his “Quaestio ix,” (Mai, vol. iv. p. 293-5):
his “Quaestio x,” (p. 295, last seven lines). See also p. 296, line
29-32.

586 See Chrys. _Opp._ vol. viii. p. 522 _c_:—ὅτι δὲ οὐδὲ συνεχῶς
ἐπεχωρίαζεν, οὐδὲ ὁμοίως, λέγει ὅτι τρίτον τοῦτο ἐφάνη αὐτοῖς, ὅτε
ἐγέρθη ἐκ νεκρῶν.