Chapter XIII: Appendix: B

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Adams (C.). HUNTER AND THE STAG. _A reply to Prof. Owen._ (8vo, London, 1881.)

Adler (H.). ZUR FRAGE DER V. (_Wien med. Woch._, 1879, 1161, 1211, 1241.)

Anstie (F. E.) THE VIVISECTION CONTROVERSY. (_Practitioner_, 1874, 38 and 321.)

Apinus (S. J.). DISS. EX JURE NATURAE: AN LICEAT BRUTORUM CORPORA MUTILARE ET SPECIATIM OB ES RECHT SEY DASS MAN DEN HUNDEN DIE OHREN ABSCHNEIDE, VARIIS OBSERVATIONIBUS AUCTA. (Altorphii Noricorum, 1722.)

Basch ZUR V. FRAGE. (_Wien med. Blaetter_, 1879, 2, 73.)

Beck (J. M.). THE LEGAL ASPECTS OF VIVISECTION. (_Medical News_, 1890, pp. 280-282.)

Bedtnitz (A.). DIE V. GAUKLER. (Wien, 8vo, 1883.)

Berdoe (E.). THE FUTILITY OF EXPERIMENTS WITH DRUGS ON ANIMALS. (8vo, London, 1889.)

---- THE HEALING ART AND THE CLAIMS OF VIVISECTION. (12mo, London, 1890.) A TRIUMPH OF VIVISECTION. (8vo, London, 1890.)

Bernard (Claude). LES VIVISECTIONS. (_Union medicale_, 1865, 305-310 _et Revue Scientifique_, 1878, 799-802.)

Bigelow (H. R.). THE PRACTICAL UTILITY OF VIVISECTION. (_Maryland Med. Journ._, 1880, 246-249.)

Bowditch (H. P.). VIVISECTION JUSTIFIABLE. (_Sanitar. New York Journ._, 1896, 229-243.)

Bos (A.). SULLE V. (_Imparziale_, 1874, 225-231.)

Brown (J. M.). VIVISECTION, A REPLY TO DR KEEN. (_J. Am. Med. Ass._, 1901, 592.)

Bryan (B.). THE BRITISH VIVISECTOR'S DIRECTORY, A BLACK BOOK FOR THE UNITED KINGDOM. (12mo, London, 1890.)

Burt. THE ETHICS OF EXPERIMENTATION UPON LIVING ANIMALS. (Post-graduate, 1890, 53-55.)

Carpenter (W. B.). THE ETHICS OF VIVISECTION. (_Fortnightly Rev._, 1882, 237-246.)

Cejon (E. de). THE ANTI-VIVISECTIONIST AGITATION. (_Contemporary Rev._, 1883, 498-910.)

Coats. ON LUDWIG AND PASTEUR, AND ON VIVISECTION. (_Glasg. Med. Journ._, 1895, 330-335.)

Cobbe (Fr. P.). ILLUSTRATIONS OF VIVISECTION. (8vo, Philadelphia, 1887.)

Cobbe (Fr.). THE MODERN RACK; PAPERS ON VIVISECTION. (8vo, London, 1889.)

Cobbe (Fr. P.). VIVISECTION; FOUR REPLIES. (_Fortnightly Rev._, 1882, 88-104, and _Contemporary Rev._, 1882, 610-626.)

Coleridge (Lord). THE NINETEENTH CENTURY DEFENDERS OF VIVISECTION. (_Fortnightly Rev._, 1882, 225-236.)

Dalton. EXPERIMENTATION ON ANIMALS. (12mo, New York, 1875.)

Dalton. MAGENDIE AS A PHYSIOLOGIST. (_Internat. Rev._, 1880, 120-129.)

Dalton (J. C). VIVISECTION: WHAT IT IS AND WHAT IT HAS ACCOMPLISHED. (_Bull. B. York Acad. med._, 1866, 159-198.)

Darwin (Ch.). VIEWS ON VIVISECTION. (_Pop. Sc. Monthly_, 1881, 424; et Rev. Scient., 1881 (1), 731.)

Davis (N. B.). THE MORAL ASPECTS OF VIVISECTION. (_North Americ. Rev._, 1885, 203-220.)

Delolm de Lalaubie. VIVISECTION, DISS. IN. (Paris, 1868.)

Deswattines. SUGGESTIF PETIT TABLEAU DE LA CRUELLE ET INUTILE VIVISECTION. (_Medecin_, 1904, 35.)

Ferguson (Sir W.). OPINIONS OF EMINENT SURGEONS, PHYSIOLOGISTS AND OTHERS, AS TO THE FOLLY AND MISLEADING AND DEMORALISING RESULTS OF VIVISECTION. (London, 1880.)

Fletcher. A FEW NOTES ON CRUELTY TO ANIMALS, ON THE INADEQUACY OF PENAL LAW. (8vo, London, 1846.)

Foreau de Courmelles. ESSAI DE LIMITATION SCIENTIFIQUE DE LA VIVISECTION. (_Revue med._, 1902, 481-484.)

Foster (M.). VIVISECTION. (_Pop. Sc. Monthly_, 1873, pp. 672-685.)

Gamgee (S.). ON VIVISECTION AND SCIENTIFIC SURGERY. (_Brit. Med. Journ._ (2), 1876, 104.)

Guetzlaw (V.). SCHOPENHAUER UeBER DIE THIERE UND DER THIERSCHUTZ. (8vo, Berlin, 1879.)

Harnack (E.). WIDER DIE V.-GEGNER. (_D. med. Woch._, 1905, 1115-1116.)

Harvey. THE PASTEUR INSTITUTE AND VIVISECTION. (_Ind. Med. Gaz._, 1895, 49-57.)

Hehir (P.). VIVISECTION SO CALLED, ITS ROLE IN THE SERVICE OF MAN AND BEAST. (_Ind. Med. Gaz._, 1897, 91.)

Heidenhain (R.). DIE V. IM DIENSTE DER HEILKUNDE. (8vo, Leipzig, 1879.)

Hermann (L.). DIE V. FRAGE. (8vo, Leipzig, 1877.)

Hodge. THE VIVISECTION QUESTION. (_Pop. Sc. Monthly_, 1896, 614-630, 771-786.)

Horsley (V.). and Rutter (A.). THE MORALITY OF VIVISECTION. (_Nineteenth Century_, 1892, pp. 804-817.)

Hutton (R. H.). THE BIOLOGISTS ON VIVISECTION. (_Nineteenth Century_, 1882, 29-39, and _Contemp. Rev._, 1883, 510-516.)

Jaeger (G.). V. UND HEILKUNST. (_Jaegers Monatsbl._, 1905, 137-141, 173-183, 197-203.)

Keen (W. W.). OUR RECENT DEBTS TO VIVISECTION. (_Pop. Sc. Monthly_, 1889, 1-15 and _Harper's Mag._, 1893, pp. 28-139.)

Keen (W. W.). MISSTATEMENTS OF THE ANTI-VIVISECTIONISTS AGAIN. (_Phil. Med. Jour._, 1901, 204-206.)

Kingsford (A.). THE USELESSNESS OF VIVISECTION. (_Nineteenth Century_, 1882, 171-183.)

Kleffer (H.). LA VIVISECTION, SON UTILITE, SA MORALE. (GENEVE, GEORG, 12mo, 1883.)

Lawson (H.). THE VIVISECTION CLAMOUR. (_Pop. Sc. Rev._, 1876, 398-405.)

Leffingwell. VIVISECTION, A REPLY TO PROF. H. WOOD. (_Bost. Med. and Surg. Journ._, 1899, 371.)

Leneveu (G.). DE L'UTILITE DE LA VIVISECTION. (Diss, in., Paris, 1883.)

Lund (P. W.). PHYSIOLOGISCHE RESULTATE DER V. NEUERER ZEIT (_trad. du Danois_). (Kopenhagen, 1825.)

Macphail (J. A.). VIVISECTION. (_Montreal Med. Journ._, 1890, 895-919.)

Magnan. DE LA FOLIE DES ANTIVIVISECTIONNISTES. (_C. R. de la Soc. de Biol. de Paris_, 1884, 101-104.)

Marechal (Ph.). LA VIVISECTION. (_Medecin_, 1904, 35, and _Revue du Cien_, 13-15.)

Maurel. LA VIVISECTION EST ELLE INDISPENSABLE. (_Ass. pour l'ac. des sciences_, 1901, 294.)

Merbach. UEBER DIE GESCHICHTE DER V. (_Jahresb. d. Ges. f. Nat. u. Heilk. in Dresd._ 1878, 98-103.)

Metzger (D.). LA VIVISECTION, LES DANGERS, ET LES CRIMES. (8vo, Paris, 1891.)

Moore (W. J.). HARVEY AND VIVISECTION. (_Ind. Med. Gaz._, 1876, 230-233.)

Moquin Tandon. RAPPORT SUR LES VIVISECTIONS. (_Bull. de l'ac. de Medecine de Paris_, 1862, 948-960.)

Nagel (R.). DER WISSENSCHAFTLICHE UNWERTH DER V IN ALLEN IHREN ARTEN. (8vo, Berlin, 1881.)

Novi (J.). SULLA V. (_Boll. d. sc. med. di Bologne_, 1893, 263, 421.)

Paget (Stephen). EXPERIMENTS ON ANIMALS. (_Murray_).

Renault (E.). LA SOC. PROTECTS. DES ANIMAUX ET LA VIVISECTION. (_Rec. de Med. veterin._, 1862, 231-247.)

Renooz (C). A PROPOS DE LA VIVISECTION. (_Medecin_, 1904, 178-179.)

Richet (Ch.). MAN'S RIGHT OVER ANIMALS. (_Pop. Sc. Monthly_, 1884, xxv., 759-766.)

Smith (R. M.). MATERIA MEDICA AND VIVISECTION. (_Merck's Arch._, 1900, 44-47.)

Smith (R. M.). SHOULD EXPERIMENTS ON ANIMALS BE RESTRICTED OR ABOLISHED? (_Therap. Gaz._, 1884, 497, 533.)

Smith (Pye). ON VIVISECTION. (_Brit. Med. Journ._ (2), 1879, 349.)

Stuser (E.). IS VIVISECTION A BENEFIT TO ANIMALS AND MAN, AND JUSTIFIABLE? (_Med. News_, 1902, 108-111.)

Tait (Lawson.). THE USELESSNESS OF VIVISECTION UPON ANIMALS AS A METHOD OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH. (London, 8vo, 1883 (?).)

Tuckermann. ABSTRACT OF THE REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON VIVISECTION. (_Columb. Med. Journ._, 1897, 237-243.)

Weber (E.). LES CHAMBRES DE TORTURE DE LA SCIENCE. (Paris, Leroux, 8vo, 1879.)

Wilberforce (C). WOMEN, CLERGYMEN AND DOCTORS. (_New Review_, 1893, 85-95.)

Wilks. THE ETHICS OF VIVISECTION. (_Pop. Sc. Monthly_, 1882, xxi., 344-350.)

Williams. A FEW PERSONAL FACTS CONCERNING EXPERIMENTS ON ANIMALS OPPOSED TO THE FALSE FANCIES OF THE PERSECUTORS OF VIVISECTORS. (_Brit. Med. Journ._, (2), 1876, 104.)

Wolff. DISPUTATIO PHILOSOPHICA DE MORALITATE ANATOMES CIRCA ANIMALIA VICA OCCUPATAE. (Leipzig, 1709.)

Wood (H.). THE CONTROL OF VIVISECTION. (_Bost. Med. and Surg. Journ._, 1895, 342.)

Zoellner (F.). UEBER DER WISSENSCHAFTLICHEN MISSBRAUCH DER V., MIT HISTORISCHEN DOCUMENTEN UeBER DIE V. VON MENSCHEN. (Leipzig, 8vo, 1880, 2nd ed., 1885.)