Chapter LX
CONCERNING THE KAAN’S PALACE OF CHAGANNOR.
At the end of those three days you find a city called CHAGAN NOR [which is as much as to say White Pool], at which there is a great Palace of the Grand Kaan’s;{1} and he likes much to reside there on account of the Lakes and Rivers in the neighbourhood, which are the haunt of swans{2} and of a great variety of other birds. The adjoining plains too abound with cranes, partridges, pheasants, and other game birds, so that the Emperor takes all the more delight in staying there, in order to go a-hawking with his gerfalcons and other falcons, a sport of which he is very fond.{3}
There are five different kinds of cranes found in those tracts, as I shall tell you. First, there is one which is very big, and all over as black as a crow; the second kind again is all white, and is the biggest of all; its wings are really beautiful, for they are adorned with round eyes like those of a peacock, but of a resplendent golden colour, whilst the head is red and black on a white ground. The third kind is the same as ours. The fourth is a small kind, having at the ears beautiful long pendent feathers of red and black. The fifth kind is grey all over and of great size, with a handsome head, red and black.{4}
Near this city there is a valley in which the Emperor has had several little houses erected in which he keeps in mew a huge number of _cators_, which are what we call the Great Partridge. You would be astonished to see what a quantity there are, with men to take charge of them. So whenever the Kaan visits the place he is furnished with as many as he wants.{5}
NOTE 1.—[According to the _Siu t’ung kien_, quoted by Palladius,
the palace in Chagannor was built in 1280.—H. C.]
NOTE 2.—“_Ou demeurent_ sesnes.” _Sesnes, Cesnes, Cecini, Cesanae_,
is a mediæval form of _cygnes, cigni_, which seems to have escaped
the dictionary-makers. It occurs in the old Italian version of
_Brunetto Latini’s Tresor_, Bk. V. ch. xxv., as _cecino_; and for
other examples, see _Cathay_, p. 125.
NOTE 3.—The city called by Polo CHAGAN-NOR (meaning in Mongol, as
he says, “White Lake”) is the _Chaghan Balghasun_ mentioned by
Timkowski as an old city of the Mongol era, the ruined rampart of
which he passed about 30 miles north of the Great Wall at Kalgan,
and some 55 miles from Siuen-hwa, adjoining the Imperial pastures.
It stands near a lake still called Chaghan-Nor, and is called by
the Chinese Pe-ching-tzu, or White City, a translation of Chaghan
Balghasun. Dr. Bushell says of one of the lakes (Ichi-Nor), a few
miles east of Chaghan-Nor: “We ... found the water black with
waterfowl, which rose in dense flocks, and filled the air with
discordant noises. _Swans_, geese, and ducks predominated, and
_three different species of cranes_ were distinguished.”
The town appears as _Tchahan Toloho_ in D’Anville. It is also,
I imagine, the _Arulun Tsaghan Balghasun_ which S. Setzen says
Kúblái built about the same time with Shangtu and another city “on
the shady side of the Altai,” by which here he seems to mean the
Khingan range adjoining the Great Wall. (_Timk._ II. 374, 378–379;
_J. R. G. S._ vol. xliii.; _S. Setz._ 115.) I see Ritter has made
the same identification of Chaghan-Nor (II. 141).
NOTE 4.—The following are the best results I can arrive at in the
identification of these five cranes.
1. Radde mentions as a rare crane in South Siberia _Grus monachus_,
called by the Buraits _Kará Togorü_, or “Black Crane.” Atkinson
also speaks of “a beautiful black variety of crane,” probably the
same. The _Grus monachus_ is not, however, jet black, but brownish
rather. (_Radde, Reisen_, Bd. II. p. 318; _Atkinson. Or. and W.
Sib._ 548.)
2. _Grus leucogeranus_ (?) whose chief habitat is Siberia, but
which sometimes comes as far south as the Punjab. It is the largest
of the genus, snowy white, with red face and beak; the ten largest
quills are black, but this barely shows as a narrow black line when
the wings are closed. The resplendent golden eyes on the wings
remain unaccounted for; no naturalist whom I have consulted has any
knowledge of a crane or crane-like bird with such decorations. When
’tis discovered, let it be the _Grus Poli_!
3. _Grus cinerea_.
4. The colour of the pendants varies in the texts. Pauthier’s and
the G. Text have _red and black_; the Lat. S. G. _black_ only, the
Crusca _black and white_, Ramusio _feathers red and blue_ (not
pendants). The _red and black_ may have slipt in from the preceding
description. I incline to believe it to be the Demoiselle,
_Anthropoides Virgo_, which is frequently seen as far north as Lake
Baikal. It has a tuft of pure _white_ from the eye, and a beautiful
black pendent ruff or collar; the general plumage purplish-grey.
5. Certainly the Indian _Sáras_ (vulgo Cyrus), or _Grus antigone_,
which answers in colours and grows to 52 inches high.
NOTE 5.—_Cator_ occurs only in the G. Text and the Crusca, in
the latter with the interpolated explanation “_cioè contornici_”
(_i.e._ quails), whilst the S. G. Latin has _coturnices_ only. I
suspect this impression has assisted to corrupt the text, and
that it was originally written or dictated _ciacor_ or _çacor_,
viz. _chakór_, a term applied in the East to more than one kind
of “Great Partridge.” Its most common application in India is
to the Himalayan red-legged partridge, much resembling on a
somewhat larger scale the bird so called in Europe. It is the
“Francolin” of Moorcroft’s Travels, and the _Caccabis Chukor_
of Gray. According to Cunningham the name is applied in Ladak to
the bird sometimes called the Snow-pheasant, Jerdan’s Snow-cock,
_Tetraogallus himalayensis_ of Gray. And it must be the latter
which Moorcroft speaks of as “the gigantic Chukor, much larger than
the common partridge, found in large coveys on the edge of the
snow; ... one plucked and drawn weighed 5 lbs.”; described by Vigne
as “a partridge as large as a hen-turkey”; the original perhaps
of that partridge “larger than a vulture” which formed one of the
presents from an Indian King to Augustus Caesar. [With reference
to the large Tibetan partridge found in the Nan-shan Mountains
in the meridian of Sha-chau by Prjevalsky, M. E. D. Morgan in a
note (_P. R. Geog. S._ ix. 1887, p. 219), writes: “_Megaloperdrix
thibetanus_. Its general name in Asia is _ullar_, a word of Kirghiz
or Turkish origin; the Mongols call it _hailik_, and the Tibetans
_kung-mo_. There are two other varieties of this bird found in the
Himalaya and Altai Mountains, but the habits of life and call-note
of all three are the same.”] From the extensive diffusion of the
term, which seems to be common to India, Tibet, and Persia (for
the latter, see _Abbott_ in _J. R. G. S._ XXV. 41), it is likely
enough to be of Mongol origin, not improbably _Tsokhor_, “dappled
or pied.” (_Kovalevsky_, No. 2196, and _Strahlenberg’s_ Vocabulary;
see also _Ladak_, 205; _Moorcr._ I. 313, 432; _Jerdan’s Birds of
India_, III. 549, 572; _Dunlop, Hunting in Himalaya_, 178; _J. A.
S. B._ VI. 774.)
The chakór is mentioned by Baber (p. 282); and also by the Hindi
poet Chand (_Rás Mála_, I. 230, and _Ind. Antiquary_, I. 273).
If the latter passage is genuine, it is adverse to my Mongol
etymology, as Chand lived before the Mongol era.
The keeping of partridges for the table is alluded to by Chaucer in
his portrait of the Franklin, _Prologue, Cant. Tales_:
“It snewed in his hous of mete and drinke,
Of alle deyntees that men coud of thinke,
After the sondry sesons of the yere,
So changed he his mete and his soupere.
_Full many a fat partrich hadde he in mewe_,
And many a breme and many a luce in stewe.”
Comments
Log in to leave a comment.
The Travels of Marco Polo — Volume 1Chapter LX
0%5 min left in chapter