Chapter I: The Successors of Sainte-Beuve
_Ordonnance_ of this chapter 431
Philarète Chasles 432
Barbey d’Aurévilly 433
On Hugo 434
On others 435
Strong redeeming points in him 436
Doudan 436
Interest of his general attitude 437
And particular utterances 437
Renan 439
Taine 440
His _culpa_ 440
His miscellaneous critical work 441
His _Histoire de la Littérature Anglaise_ 442
Its shortcomings 443
Instances of them 443
Moutégut: his peculiarities 444
Delicacy and range of his work 446
Scherer: peculiar _moral_ character of his
criticism 447
Its consequent limitations 448
The solid merits accompanying them 448
Sainte-Beuve + Gautier 450
Banville 450
Saint-Victor 451
Baudelaire 452
Crépet’s _Les Poètes Français_ 453
Flaubert: the “Single Word” 454
“Naturalism” 454
Zola 455
_Le Roman Experimental_ 456
Examples of his criticism 456
The reasons of his critical incompetency 458
“Les Deux Goncourt” 458
“Scientific criticism”: Hennequin 459
“Comparative Literature”: Texte 462
Academic Criticism: Gaston Paris 464
Caro, Taillandier, &c. 465
The “Light Horsemen”: Janin 466
Pontmartin 467
Veuillot 468
Not so black as, &c. 469
The present 469
Comments
Log in to leave a comment.
A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 3 (of 3), Modern criticismChapter I: The Successors of Sainte-Beuve
0%1 min left in chapter