Chapter IX (8)
“This, then, is the mode of observing which has appeared to me the best, and by means of which we may obtain very great precision in measuring the intensity of two lights. I view, first, the two shadows in such a manner that both of them may be seen in succession from either side of the body which produces them, and at equal distances. For this purpose I use a good opera-glass. I alter the distance of the flames until in those two positions I perceive the differences (of the intensity in the shadows) to be in opposite directions. The distances of the lamps may then be considered as very nearly in the proper proportion for producing equal shadows, and to make them exactly so, the differences, which are observed on either side (of the centre line between them), should be equal; and, of course, the two shadows themselves, seen at one moment from either side of the opaque body, should be perfectly equal also.[85] These three observations, which mutually serve to verify or correct each other, will lead, with a little practice, to very great precision in the result. We may, also, by using a narrow screen, bring the shadows sufficiently near to touch each other; the variations of the tints then become very small by any change of our position, and we may, in this case, rest content with observing them from one point. To get rid of large penumbrae which are always an obstacle in forming a right estimate of the tints of the shadows, I place the opaque body very near the screen.
[85] I prefer to view the exterior portions of both shadows from the
central line itself, in which case the opaque rod stands between
them, because, in this manner, I obtain a more correct comparison by
the direct contrast of the surfaces than by successive views of them,
however quickly taken.
“When we wish to make a great many observations, it is very convenient to mark divisions on the table (which carries the lights), in order to read off, by means of them, the distance of the lamps from the shadows which they illuminate. By this means, each observation need not occupy more than two minutes. I generally use a table CC DD (fig. 97), about two mètres long (6 feet 6 inches), by 80 centimètres wide (2 feet 8 inches). At one end I place the screen AB, covered with white paper, dull (or not glazed), and kept in a vertical plane by two small pieces P and Q. Through the point M, the centre of the opaque body, I draw two lines M _f_ and M _g_, equally inclined to the central line _x_ _y_, whose extremities _b′_, _a′_ are the axes of the two shadows. These lines must be inclined in such a manner that the distance of the shadows may be a little less than the diameter of the opaque body, or so that they may actually touch each other, according to the mode of observing which you wish to follow. These lines M _f_, M _g_ I divide into decimètres and centimètres, starting from the points _a′_, _b′_ and over these lines I place the centres of the flames; the distance between the shadows remains always the same, whatever may be the distance of the lamps: to determine the distance of each lamp from the shadow which it illuminates, we ought, strictly speaking, to take the distance of the centre of the flame _b_ from the point _a′_; but as the distance from the point _b_ to the point _a′_ differs little from the distance between the points _b_ and _b′_, we assume the latter for the former, without causing any sensible error. That distance may be obtained very conveniently by taking the half of the sum of the distances of the two extremities _z_ and _z′_ of the diameter of the pedestal of the lamp. When the burner is not placed over the centre of the pedestal, we may suspend from it a small plummet, whose point will touch some division and indicate the distance between the centre of the burner and the shadow.
“When the lights are coloured, the shadows are coloured also, and it is then far more difficult to judge accurately of their intensity. They may in that case be much better seen from the point _x_, as the black opaque body which is interposed between them renders the difference of colour less sensible to the eye.
“The opaque body M is a cylindric rod of iron, whose upper part is blackened in the flame of a lamp, in order to prevent the reflection which might interfere with the _sharpness_ (_netteté_) of the shadows, and to make them more distinct when they are viewed from the point x.”[86]
[86] Those who feel a curiosity to look farther into this subject may
consult Count Rumford’s elaborate paper in the Phil. Trans. for 1794,
p. 67.
I shall make a few trifling additions to M. Peclet’s clear description of his excellent mode of measuring the intensity of lights. It is, of course, presumed throughout, that the centres of the flames should be on one level; and I have found it most convenient to place the lamps on small carriages with rollers, which are guided by means of fine strips of wood nailed along the table in the directions _g_ M and _f_ M, and carrying the divided scales of centimètres. This affords the means of making any slight change in the position of the lamps so easily, as entirely to avoid the disturbance of the flame which ensues from lifting the lamp and readjusting it in another position; and will, in practice, be found very convenient when many observations are to be made. I have already said that my own experience has satisfied me that, with the aid of a good opera-glass, the central observation of the two shadows, with the opaque rod between them, is by far the best, and conducts, at once, to a result which is confirmed by the observations of two assistants who watch the shadows at the same time on opposite sides of the table, and at equal distances from them. I have found it convenient in comparing lights, to cover the table with dull black linen cloth, and to surround it with curtains of the same material, hung from slender brackets, in such a manner as to leave space for the observer to move freely round the table within them. The curtains prevent reflection from the walls of the chamber in which the experiments may be conducted, and also lessen the disturbing effects of currents of air. When a comparison of the _intensity_, and not of the _aggregate power_ of two flames, is to be made, it is necessary to adopt the precaution of inclosing the lights in opaque boxes, with slits of equal area in each, placed on the same level, and so arranged, in reference to the flames, as to be directly opposite the brightest portion of each. After what has been said, it will be almost needless to add that the _quotient of the square of the greater observed distance divided by the lesser, is the ratio of the illuminating power of the two flames_. The most convenient mode of registering observations, and that which is generally practised, is in the form of a Table like the following:--
+-------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
| | | | Illuminating |
| | | | Power, |
| | | Squares of | or Quotient |
| | Distance. | Distances. | of Squares. |
| +-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
|Trials.|Lamp A.|Lamp B.|Lamp A.|Lamp B.|Lamp A.|Lamp B.|
+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
| 1 | 143 | 140 |20,449 |19,700 | 1·00 | 0·958 |
| 2 | 117 | 114 |13,689 |12,996 | 1·00 | 0·949 |
+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
As a standard lamp by which to test others, I believe few will be found superior to the best Carcel lamp, which has a clockwork movement, and whose flame continues to increase in power for about four hours after it is lighted; after which it maintains its state permanently, until the supply of oil fails. This fact was verified by M. Peclet with the greatest care. “I took,” says he, “two similar lamps. They were lighted at the same time, and their relative intensities were measured. One was then extinguished, without touching the wick, and its clockwork movement was stopped. One hour afterwards, I set the clockwork in motion and relighted the lamp, but without touching the wick. It was found in the same state as at the first comparison, and I measured its intensity in reference to the first. Those experiments I repeated every hour, and these are the results which I obtained. The lamp which I call No. 1, is that which remained continually burning; No. 2, is that which was only lighted during the continuance of the (successive) observations.”
+------------++-------------------------+
| || Intensities. |
| Times of ++------------+------------+
|Observation.||Lamp, No. 1.|Lamp, No. 2.|
+-----+------++------------+------------+
| H. | M. || | |
| 5 | 30 || 100 | 100 |
| 6 | 30 || 103 | 100 |
| 7 | 30 || 106 | 100 |
| 8 | 30 || 110 | 100 |
| 9 | 30 || 117 | 100 |
| 10 | 30 || 117 | 100 |
| 11 | 30 || 117 | 100 |
| 12 | 30 || 117 | 100 |
+-----+------++------------+------------+
This curious scale of increase in power, seems to be solely due to a peculiarity of the manner in which the lamp, that derives its supply of oil by clockwork, becomes heated; and the effect may be described as follows: The heating of the wicks, the chimney, and the oil in this burner, as in that of all other lamps, tends to increase the light; but, in an ordinary lamp, acting by a constant pressure, this _maximum_ of heat is soon attained; whereas in the clockwork-lamp, into the burner of which the oil is thrown up by a pump, the whole of the oil in the cistern must reach its maximum temperature before the _best_ effect of that lamp is produced. After this state has been reached, there is no disturbing influence at work, and the lamp burns steadily as long as the oil lasts.
I have myself tried what may naturally appear to be the most simple mode of obtaining an unvarying standard-light, by employing a gas-burner, supplied from a gasometer under a constant pressure; but I found it very difficult to obtain satisfactory proof of the constancy of the pressure; and in a large town, where there are many burners around one, their lighting or extinction is found to exercise a material influence in changing the condition of the flame. I must confess that I have always been disappointed in attempting to use a gas-flame as a standard of comparison.
~Floating Lights.~
There are various dangers on the shores of Britain, more especially at the entrance of the great estuaries of England and also in Ireland, whose position is such as to put them beyond the reach of regular lighthouses. Sand-banks which are too soft to sustain a solid structure, and have too deep water on them to admit of the erection of screw-pile lighthouses, are often the sites for mooring light-vessels, to guide the mariner into the entrance of some estuary, or enable him to thread his way through the mazes of _gats_ and channels, which, even during the daytime, baffle the mariner, who sees no natural object on the low sandy shores of the neighbouring coast to help him to guess at his true position. The first Light-vessel moored on the coast of Great Britain, was that at the Nore in 1734. There are now no fewer than 26 floating lights on the coast of England.
By the kindness of the Elder Brethren of the Corporation of Trinity House of Deptford Strond, I am enabled to give the following brief sketch of the nature and peculiarities of Floating Lights which was communicated to me by Mr Herbert, the secretary of the Corporation:--
“The annual expense of maintaining a Floating Light, including the wages and victualling of the crew, who are eleven in number, is, on an average, L.1000; and the first cost of such a vessel, fitted complete with lantern and lighting apparatus, anchors, cables, &c., is nearly L.5000. The lanterns are octagonal in form, 5 feet 6 inches in diameter; and, where fixed lights are exhibited, they are fitted with eight Argand lamps, each in the focus of a parabolic reflector of twelve inches diameter; but, in the revolving lights, four lamps and reflectors only are fitted. The greatest depth of water in which any light-vessel belonging to the Corporation of Trinity House of Deptford Strond at present rides, is about 40 fathoms (which is at the station of the _Seven Stones_ between the Scilly Islands and the coast of Cornwall).
“The Corporation’s light-vessels are moored with chain-cables of 1¹⁄₂ inch diameter, and a single mushroom anchor of 32 cwt., in which cases the chain-cables are 200 fathoms in length; some of the said vessels are moored to _span-ground_ moorings, consisting of 100 fathoms of chain to each arm, and a mushroom anchor of similar weight at the end of each; a riding cable of 150 fathoms being in such cases attached to the centre ring of the ground chain. The tonnage and general dimensions of the light-vessel are given on the drawing of the lines.” (See Plate XXIX.)
~Beacons and Buoys.~
Still lower in the scale of “signs and marks of the sea,” are Beacons and Buoys, which are used to point out those dangers which, either owing to the difficulty and expense that would attend the placing of more efficient marks to serve by night as well as by day, are necessarily left without lights, or which, from the peculiarity of their position, in passages too intricate for navigation by night, are, in practice, considered to be sufficiently indicated by day-marks alone. Beacons, as being more permanent, are preferred to Buoys; but they are generally placed only on rocks or banks which are dry at some period of the tide. On rocks, in exposed situations, the kind of Beacon used is generally that of squared masonry, secured by numerous joggles (as shewn at Plate XXXII.); and in situations difficult of access, and in which works of uncompleted masonry could not be safely left during the winter season, an open framework of cast-iron pipes, firmly trussed and braced, and secured to the rock with strong _louis-bats_, is preferred. The details of this framework are shewn at Plates XXX. and XXXI. A stone Beacon of the form and dimensions shewn in Plate XXXII., may be erected for about L.700, and the iron Beacon shewn at Plate XXX., for about L.640. In less exposed places, where the bottom is gravel or hard sand, a conical form of Beacon, composed of cast-iron plates, united with flanges and screws, with rust-joints between them, is sometimes used. A Beacon of this kind is shewn at Plate XXXII., which can be erected for about L.400.
Lastly, Buoys, which may be regarded as the least efficient kind of mark, and as bearing the same relation to a Beacon that a Floating-light does to a Lighthouse, are used to mark by day _dangers_ which are always covered even at low water, and also to line out the fair-ways of channels. They are, for the most part, of one of the three forms shewn in Plate XXXIII., viz., the _Nun-buoy_, in the form of a parabolic spindle, generally truncated at one end, so as to carry a mast or frame of cage-work, and loaded at the other end, so as to float in a vertical position; the _Can-buoy_, which is a conoid floating on its side; and, lastly, the _Cask-buoy_, which is a short frustum of a spindle truncated at both ends, but almost exclusively used for carrying the warps of vessels riding at moorings. Those buoys are of various sizes and differ in cost. Mast-buoys, from 10 to 15 feet in length, cost from L.23, 15s. to L.48; and those of the Ribble and the Tay, which are 21 and 24 feet long, cost respectively L.105 and L.79; the _Can-buoys_ are from 5 to 8 feet long, and cost from L.13, 13s. to L.20, 5s. Large buoys are often built on _kneed_ frames resembling the timbers of vessels. The Cask-buoy is generally 6 feet long, and costs L.22, 15s. All these buoys are formed of strong oaken barrel-staves, well hooped with iron rings, and shielded with soft timber; and the nozzle-pieces at the small end of the _Nun_ and _Can_ buoys are generally solid quoins of oak, formed with a _raglet_ or groove to receive the ends of the staves. Much skill, on the part of the cooper, is required in heating and moulding the staves to the required form; and great care must be taken that they be of well-seasoned timber. Buoys are not caulked with oakum, but with dry flags closely compressed between the edges of the staves, which swell on being wet; and they are carefully proved by _steaming_ them like barrels, to see if they be quite tight. Buoys are also formed of sheet-iron, in which case they are sometimes protected with fenders of timber; but they have been found more troublesome for transport, and, for most situations, are considered less convenient than those of timber.
In the beginning of 1845, I suggested the idea of rendering Beacons and Buoys useful during night, by coating them with some phosphorescent substance, or surmounting them with a globe of strong glass filled with such a preparation, whose combustion is very slow, and emits a dull whitish light and little heat. Some experiments were accordingly made by my suggestion; but I cannot add that any practically useful result has been obtained.
In laying down Beacons or Buoys, their position is fixed, as may be seen in the Table in the Appendix, either by the intersection of two lines drawn through two leading objects on the shore (the magnetic bearings of which are given for the sake of easy reference on the spot, in finding out the marks), or by means of the angles contained between lines drawn to various objects on the shore, which meet at the Beacon or Buoy from which they are measured by means of a sextant. In the latter case, the angles are always measured around the whole horizon, thus affording a check by the difference of their sum from 360°. The magnetic bearing of one of those lines is afterwards carefully ascertained, by means of the prismatic compass (if possible from one of the objects on shore, and if not, conversely from the Beacon or Buoy), so as to afford the means of translating the whole into magnetic bearings for the use of seamen. The buoys are moored, as shewn in Plate XXXIII., by means of chains and iron sinkers, with a sufficient allowance in the length of the chain to permit them to _ride_ easily.
APPENDIX.
Comments
Log in to leave a comment.
Account of the Skerryvore lighthouseChapter IX (8)
0%13 min left in chapter