Chapter XVII: Section 4: is absurdly broad and indefinite and covers pastry or

other works of a cook. It should be amended by inserting the word
"literary" before the word "works," or by substituting the word
"writings," which is used in the Constitution and is the
preferable word to employ, or by inserting after the word "works"
the words "mentioned in section 5 hereof."

In section 5 paragraph (h) should be eliminated. This paragraph
was intended to cover perforated music sheets or talking-machine
records which are to be otherwise provided for. As to other
matters it may be said that if the reproductions referred to are
copies of things already copyrighted, they are infringements; if
not copies, they are works of art in themselves under paragraph
(g) of section 5.

On page 4 "The above specifications shall," in line 8 and line 9
and line 10, to and including the words "nor shall," should be
canceled, and in line 11, after "classification," insert the words
"shall not."

It is obvious that an unlimited subject-matter of copyright is
highly undesirable from the standpoint of the public.

In section 6, line 15, after "compilations," insert "or," and in
the same line strike out "or other versions." These words are
plainly unnecessary and are intended to have a capability of
elastic interpretation unduly favorable to the author and
prejudicial to the public.

In section 7, paragraph (b), the words "of a work" and the rest of
line 6 and lines 7, 8, and 9, to and including the word "text,"
should be canceled. If a work has fallen into the public domain,
even though subsequent to 1891, it would be retroactive to now
bring it within the copyright law and deprive the public of its
use.