Skip to content

Chapter I: Part 1

Text size

NOTES AND QUERIES:

A MEDIUM OF INTER-COMMUNICATION FOR LITERARY MEN, ARTISTS, ANTIQUARIES, GENEALOGISTS, ETC.

* * * * *

"When found, make a note of."--CAPTAIN CUTTLE.

* * * * *

NO. 15] SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 1850. [Price Threepence. Stamped Edition 4d.

* * * * * {225}

CONTENTS.

NOTES:-- Page
Wages in 17th and 19th centuries, by Rev. L.B. Larking ..225
Marlowe and the old Taming of a Shrew, by S. Hickson ....226
Notes from Fly-Leaves, No. 6., by Rev. J. Jebb ..........227
Shakspeare's Use of Monosyllables, by C. Forbes .........227
Notes on Cunningham's London, by E.F. Rimbault ..........228

QUERIES:--
Folk Lore (Metrical Charms), by William J. Thoms ........229
Allusions in the Homilies ...............................229
Minor Queries:--Pope's Translations of
Horace--
Havior--Arabic Numerals--Eaton's Edward III.--
Dog Latin--Cuckoo, Welsh Ambassador--A recent
Novel--Authorship of a couplet--Seal of Killigrew .....230

REPLIES:--
Selago and Samolus ......................................231
Ælfric's Colloquy, by B. Thorpe .........................232
Portraits of Luther and Erasmus .........................232
Replies to Minor Queries:--Praise undeserved--French
Maxim--Singular Motto--Discurs, Modest.--Pallace
--Litany Version of the Psalms--Tempora Mutantur,
&c.--Pandoxare--St. Thomas of Lancaster--Fall of
Rain in England--Judas Bell--Boduc on British
Coins--Lord Bacon's Version of the Psalms--A
"Gib" Cat--Lay of the Phoenix, &c. ....................233

MISCELLANIES:--
Execution of Duke of Monmouth--By Hook or by Crook
--Cupid Crying--Miry-land Town ..........................237

MISCELLANEOUS:--
Notes on Books, Sales, Catalogues, &c. ..................238
Books and Odd Volumes Wanted ............................238
Notices to Correspondents ...............................238
Advertisements ..........................................238

* * * * *

WAGES IN 17TH AND 19TH CENTURIES.

Running my eye accidentally through the household book of Sir Roger Twysden, from 1659 to 1670, it occurred to me to make a comparison between the relative prices of meat and wages, as there given, in order to ascertain the position of our peasantry in these parts, at the close of the 17th century. I send you a few extracts, by which it will be seen that, in Kent, at least, our agricultural labourers appear to have been in far better condition than those of the rest of England, who, in Mr. Macaulay's brilliant work, are represented as living "almost entirely on rye, barley, and oats," owing to the exorbitantly high price of meat, as compared with the ordinary scale of wages.

As to meat, I find the following entries:--

"1659. Beef
2s. and 1s. 8d. per stone.
a loin of mutton 1s. 6d.
1662. Beef 2s. per stone.
a shin of beef 1s. 10d.
a loin of veal 3s. 4d.
a calve's head 1s. 2d.
a quarter of mutton 4s. 4d. and 5s.
a side of mutton 9s.
1664. 8 quarters of mutton 32s.
1 quarter of do. 4s.
6 stone of beef 10s. 4d.
1666. 6 stone of beef 10s. 4d.
a fat weather 12s. 8d.
32 fat weathers 19l.
1667. 10 stone of beef and 2 lb. of suet 18s.
22 stone of beef 2l.
23 stone of beef 2l. 3s.
a chine and a quarter of veal 8s.
1670. A chine and a quarter of mutton 5s.
a quarter of lamb 2s. 6d."

Through this period we have:--

"Cheese per load, _i.e._ 56 lb., at 14s., 11s., 10s., 4d.,
9s. 6d."

The wages of labourers through the same period are entered:--

"Sawyer 2s. 6d. per hundred.
a farm carpenter 1s. 6d. per day.
or, 'I finding him,' 1s. per day.
common labourers, generally 1s. per \
day; sometimes, but less frequently, > in 1849, 2s.
9d. per day /
threshing wheat, 16d. per quarter in 1849, 3s.
mowing, from 1s. to 1s. 8d. per acre in 1849, 3s. 6d.
mowing oats, 1s. 3d. per acre in 1849, 2s. 6d.
mowing clover, 1s. 6d. per acre in 1849, 2s. 6d.
hayers, 2s. and 2s. 6d. per week in 1849, 6s.
reaping, 2s. per acre in 1849, 10s. to 14s.
sheep shearing, 1s. per score in 1849, 2s. 6d.
hedging 2-1/2d. per rod in 1849, 4d.
hoeing, 6d. per acre in 1849, 4s.
women 8d. per day in 1849, 1s., and 1s. 4d.
boys, 4d. per day in 1849, 6d. and 3d.
making faggots, 18d. and 20d. per hundred; in 1849, 3s."

A reference to the household-books of the Derings, in East Kent, gives the same results.

The wages given by Sir Roger Twysden to his household servants at this time were:--

"Housekeeper 5l. per annum.
maids 2l. 10s. and 3l.
men 5l. 10s., 5l. and 4l."

{226}I have added, in most instances, the prices now paid to labourers in these parts, having obtained my information from the farmers of the neighbourhood.

The price of butchers' meat at present, in this neighbourhood, is from 6d. to 7 1/2d. per lb.; by wholesale, 3s. 6d. or 3s. 8d. per stone.

As far, then, as the relative prices of wages and meat can guide us, the labourer, in these parts, was as well able to purchase meat in 1670 as he is now.

Unhappily for him, the imprudence of early marriage entailing upon him the charge of a family, he is precluded from the indulgence in fresh meat, except as an occasional treat. Cheese and bacon, however, are still within his reach. The improvidence of early marriage rarely occurred in former days, and palpably, if our Kentish labourers lived _entirely_ on oats and rye, it was not of _necessity_ that they did so. I am inclined to think that, in many of the instances given above, especially in haying and harvest, provisions of some sort were found by the employer, over and above the wages. When I have more leisure, I will endeavour to obtain correct information on this point; and meanwhile, send you the entries just as I find them. I observe an entry of "peas to boil for the men." They had porridge then, at all events, in addition to their wages; and these wages, if they had so chosen, could further have purchased them meat, quite as well as at the present day; though, alas for our poor peasantry, this is not saying much for them; and even of that little smack of meat they will soon be debarred, if the present system--but I am intruding on sacred ground, and must leave the poor fellows to their hard work and scanty meals.

LAMBERT B. LARKING.

* * * * *

MARLOWE AND THE OLD "TAMING OF A SHREW."

I regret that my communication (No. 13. p. 194.), on the subject of the authorship of _The Taming of a Shrew_, was too late to be of any avail for the already-published new edition of Marlowe's works; and, had I been aware of such being the case, I should have waited until I had had an opportunity of seeing a work whose editor may entertain views in ignorance of which, to my disadvantage, I am still writing. It is, perhaps, a still greater disadvantage that I should appear to depend for proofs upon a bare enumeration of parallel passages; when I know that the space I should require for the purposes of stating the case fully and fairly, and, as I think, conclusively, would be utterly inconsistent with that brevity which must be with you an essential condition; while, at the same time, I know of no medium through which I am so likely to enlist the attention of a "fit audience" as your publication. Premising that my references are to _The Taming of a Shrew_ in "Six Old Plays," 1799, and to Marlowe's Works, edit. 1826, I proceed to indicate such passages as a rapid glance through the respective works, aided by some previous acquaintance with the subject, and a not very bad memory, furnished. Some of the parallels will be found identical; in others, the metaphors will be found to be the same, with the expression more or less varied; and in others, again, particular expressions are the same, though the tenor of the phrase be different. It will be observed that the quotations of Marlowe are exclusively from _Dr. Faustus_ and _Tamburlaine_. Of the longer passages I have given merely the first line for reference; and I have numbered them for the convenience of comparison:--

THE TAMING OF A SHREW.

(1) "Now that the gloomy shadow of the night," &c. p. 161.

(2) "But stay, what dames are these, so bright of hue," &c. p. 167.

(3) "O, might I see the censer of my soule." &c. p.169.

(4) "Come, fair Emelia, my lovely love," &c. p. 180.
"Valeria, attend, I have a lovely love," &c. p. 191.
"And all that pierceth Phoebus' silver eye," &c. p. 181.
"Fair Emelia, summer's bright sun queen," &c. p.199.

(5) "I fill'd my coffers of the wealthy mines," &c. p.181.

(6) "As richly wrought
As was the massy robe that late adorn'd
The stately legate of the Persian king," p.183.

(7) "_Boy_. Come hither, sirha boy.
_Sander_. Boy, O, disgrace to my person!" &c. p.184.

MARLOWE.

(1) "Now that the gloomy shadow of the night," &c.
--_Faustus_, vol. ii. p.127.

(2) "Zenocrate, the loveliest maid alive," &c.
--_Tamb_. vol. i. p.46.

(3) "Whose darts do pierce the centre of my soul," &c.
--_Tamb._ vol. i. p.120.

"Was this the face that launch'd a thousand ships," &c.
--_Faustus_, vol. ii. p.192.

(4) "Now bright Zenocrate, the world's fair eye," &c.
--_Tamb_. vol. i. p.102

"Batter the shining palace of the sun," &c.
--_Tamb_. vol. i. p.120

"A greater lamp than that bright eye of heaven," &c.
--_Tamb_. vol. i. p.154.

--"the golden eye of heaven."
--_Tamb_. vol. i. p.155.

"Wherein are rocks of pearl that shine as bright," &c.
--_Tamb_. vol. i. p.177.

(5) "I'll have them fly to India for gold," &c.
--_Faustus_, vol. ii. p. 123.

(6) "And show your pleasure to the Persian
As fits the legate of the stately Turk."
--_Tamb_. vol. i. p.87.
{226}

(7) "_Wagner_. Come hither, sirha! Boy!
_Clown_. Boy! O disgrace to my person!" &c.
--_Faustus_, vol. ii, p. 131.

Leaving the question in this position for the present, I shall be glad of such information from any of your readers as may tend to throw a light on the date of Shakspeare's _Taming of the Shrew_. I find Mr. Collier's opinion expressed in the following words:--

"The great probability is that _Hamlet_ was written
at the earliest in 1601, and the _Taming of the Shrew_
perhaps came from the pen of its author not very long afterwards."

I am anxious to ascertain whether I am acquainted with all the circumstances on which the above opinion is founded; as those which I can, at this moment, recall, are to my mind hardly sufficiently conclusive. Rejecting the supposed allusion to Heywood's _Woman Kill'd with Kindness_, which I see, by a note, Mr. Collier gives up as untenable ground, the facts, I believe, remain as follows:--

First: _The Taming of the Shrew_ was not mentioned by Meres in 1598, whereupon it is assumed that "had it been written, he could scarcely have failed to mention it." And,

Second: it must have been written after _Hamlet_, because the name Baptista, used incorrectly in that play as a feminine name, is properly applied to a man in this. And these, I believe, are all. Now, the first of these assumptions I answer, by asking, "Does it follow?" Of all Shakspeare's plays which had then appeared, only three had been published before 1598, and not one comedy. Meres, in all probability, had no list to refer to, nor was he making one: he simply adduced, in evidence of his assertion of Shakspeare's excellence, both in tragedy and comedy, such plays of both kinds as he _could_ recollect, or the best of those which he _did_ recollect. Let us put the case home; not in reference to any modern dramatist (though Shakspeare in his own day was not the great exception that he stands with us), but to the world-honoured poet himself, who has founded a sort of religion in us: I, for my part, would not be bound not to omit, in a hasty enumeration, and having no books to refer to, more important works than the _Taming of the Shrew_. In short, the omission by Meres proves no more than that he either did not think of the play, or did not think it necessary to mention it. To the second assumption, I answer that the date of the _first Hamlet_ is "not proven:" it may have been an early play. From the play of _Hamlet_, in its earlier form, is the name Baptiste, where it is used in conjunction with Albertus, taken; the scene mentioned is Guiana; and there is nothing to lead one to suppose that the name is used as an Italian name at all. Both the date of _Hamlet_, therefore, and--whichever way decided--the conclusion drawn from the supposed mistake, I regard as open questions. There is yet another circumstance which Mr. Collier thinks may strengthen his conclusion with regard to the date of this play. He refers to the production of Dekker's _Medicine for a Curst Wife_, which he thinks was a revival of the old _Taming of a Shrew_, brought out as a rival to Shakspeare's play. This is easily answered. In the first place, Katharine, the Shrew, is not a "curst wife:" she becomes a wife, it is true, in the course of the play; but this is a part of the process of taming her. But what seems at once to disprove it is, that, according to Henslow's account, Dekker was paid 10_l_. 10_s_. for the piece in question; as Mr. Collier observes, an "unusually large sum" for a new piece, and not likely to be paid for the bashing up of an old one. I am thus left entirely without a clue, derivable from external evidence, to the date of this play; and shall be glad to know if there is any thing, throwing light upon the point, which I may have overlooked. That more important consequences are involved in this question than appear upon the face of it, I think I shall be able to show in a future communication; and this is my excuse for trespassing so much upon your space and your readers' patience.

SAMUEL HICKSON.

St. John's Wood, Jan. 26. 1850.

* * * * *

NOTES FROM FLY-LEAVES, NO. 6.

In a copy of Burnet's _Telluris Theoria Sacra_ (in Latin), containing only the two first books (1 vol. 4to., Lond. 1689), there is the following entry in Bishop Jebb's hand-writing:--

"From the internal evidence, not only of additional matter
in the margin of this copy, but of frequent erasures and
substitutions, I was led to suppose it was the author's copy,
illustrated by his own annotations and improvements. The
supposition is, perhaps, sufficiently corroborated by the
following extract from the _Biographia Britannica_,
vol. iii. p. 18.

"'It seems it was usual with Dr. Burnet, before he published
any thing in Latin, to have two or three copies, and no more,
printed off, which he kept by him for some time, in order to
revise at leisure what he had written _currente calamo_,
and sometimes, when he thought proper, to be communicated to
his particular friends for their opinions, &c.'

"This copy, as it does not differ from any of the editions of
1689, was certainly not one of those _proofs_. But the
Doctor's habit of annotating on his own Latin books after they
were printed, renders it extremely probable that this book was
a preparation for a new edition. It would be well to compare it
with the English translation."

The nature of many of the corrections and additions (which are very numerous), evidently shows a preparation for the press. I have compared this copy with the English edition, published in the same year, and find that some of the {228}corrections were adopted; this, however, but in a few instances, while in one, to be mentioned presently, a palpable mistake, corrected in the MS. Latin notes, stands in the translation. The English version differs very materially from the Latin. The author says in his Preface:--

"This English version is the same in substance with the
Latin, though I confess, 'tis not so properly a translation,
as a new composition upon the same ground, there being
several additional chapters in it, and several new moulded."

The following are examples of corrections being adopted: P. 6. Latin ed. "Quod abunde probabitur in principio libri secundi." For the last word _subsequentis_ is substituted, and the English has _following_. P. 35. "Hippolitus" is added to the authorities in the MS.; and in the English, p. 36., "Anastasius Sinaiti, S. Gaudentius, Q. Julius Hilarius, Isidorus Hispalensis, and Cassiodorus," are inserted after Lactantius, in both. P. 37. "Johannes Damascenus" is added after St. Augustin in both. P. 180. a clause is added which seems to have suggested the sentence beginning, "Thus we have discharged our promise," &c. But, on the other hand, in p. 8. the allusion to the "Orphics," which is struck out in the Latin, is retained in the English; and in the latter there is no notice taken of "Empedocles," which is inserted in the margin of the Latin. In p. 11. "Ratio naturalis" is personified, and governs the verb _vidit_, which is repeated several times. This is changed by the corrector into vidimus; but in the English passage, though varying much from the Latin, the personification is retained. In p. 58., "Dion Cassius" is corrected to "Xiphilinus;" but the mistake is preserved in the English version.

JOHN JEBB.

* * * * *

SHAKSPEARE'S EMPLOYMENT OF MONOSYLLABLES.

I offer the following flim-flam to the examination of your readers, all of whom are, I presume, more or less, readers of Shakspeare, and far better qualified than I am to "anatomize" his writings, and "see what bred about his heart."

I start with the proposition that the language of passion is almost invariably broken and abrupt, and the deduction that I wish to draw from this proposition, and the passages that I am about to quote is, that--_Shakspeare on more than one occasion advisedly used monosyllables, and monosyllables only, when he wished to express violent and overwhelming mental emotion_, ex. gratiâ:--

_Lear._ "Thou know'st the first time that we smell the air,
We wawl, and cry:--I will preach to thee; mark me.

[_Gloster._ "Alack! alack the day!]

_Lear._ "When we are born, we cry, that we are come
To this great stage of fools,--This a good block?"
--_King Lear_, Act IV. Sc. 6.

In this passage [I bracket Gloster] we find no fewer than _forty-two monosyllables_ following each other consecutively. Again,

"------but through his lips do throng
Weak words, so thick come, in his poor heart's aid,
That no man could _distinguish_ what he said."
_Rape of Lucreece_, Stanza 255.

After I had kept this among other flim-flams for more than a year in my note-book, I submitted it in a letter to the examination of a friend; his answer was as follows:--"Your canon is ingenious, especially in the line taken from the sonnet. I doubt it however, much, and rather believe that sound is often sympathetically, and as it were unconsciously, adapted to sense. Moreover, monosyllables are redundant in our tongue, as you will see in the scene you quote. In _King John_, Act III. Sc. 3., where the King is _pausing_ in his wish to incense Hubert to Arthur's murder, he says:--

'Good friend, though hast no cause to say so yet:
But thou shall have; and creep time ne'er so slow,
Yet it shall come, for me to do thee good.
I had a thing to say,--But let it go:'--

forty monosyllables."

"Credimus? an qui amant ipsi sibi somnia fingunt."

The very passage he quoted seemed, to my eyes, rather a _corroboration_ of the theory, than an _argument against it_! I might, I think, have quoted the remainder of Lear's speech ending with the words "Kill, kill, kill, kill, kill, kill," and, with the exception of three words, consisting _entirely_ of monosyllables, and one or two other passages. But I have written enough to express my meaning.

C. FORBES.

Temple.

* * * * *

NOTES UPON CUNNINGHAM'S HAND-BOOK FOR LONDON.

_ Wild House, Drury Lane._--Mr. Cunningham says, "Why so called, I am not aware." _Wild_ is a corruption of _Weld_. It was the town mansion of the family of the _Welds_, of Lutworth Castle.

_Compton Street, Soho._--Built in the reign of Charles the First by Sir Francis Compton. _New_ Compton Street, when first formed, was denominated Stiddolph Street, after Sir Richard Stiddolph, the owner of the land. It afterwards changed its name, from a demise of the whole adjoining marsh land, made by Charles the Second to Sir Francis Compton. All this, and the intermediate streets, formed part of the site of the Hospital of St. Giles.

_Tottenham Court Road._--The old manor-house, sometimes called in ancient records "Totham Hall," was, in Henry the Third's reign, the residence of William de Tottenhall. Part of the old buildings were remaining in 1818.

{229}_Short's Gardens, Drury Lane_.--Dudley Short, Esq., had a mansion here, with fine garden attached, in the reign of Charles the Second.

_Parker Street, Drury Lane._--Phillip Parker, Esq., had a mansion on this site in 1623.

_Bainbridge and Buckridge Streets, St. Giles's_.--The two streets, now no more, but once celebrated in the "annals of low life," were built prior to 1672, and derived their names from their owners, eminent parishioners in the reign of Charles the Second.

_Dyot Street, St. Giles's._--This street was inhabited, as late as 1803, by Philip Dyot, Esq., a descendant of the gentleman from whom it takes its name. In 1710 there was a certain "Mendicant's Convivial Club" held at the "Welch's Head" in this street. The origin of this club dated as far back as 1660, when its meetings were held at the Three Crowns in the Poultry.

_Denmark Street, St. Giles's._--Originally built in 1689. Zoffany, the celebrated painter, lived at No. 9. in this street. The same house is also the scene of Bunbury's caricature, "The Sunday Evening Concert:"--

"July 27. 1771.--Sir John Murray, late Secretary to the
Pretender, was on Thursday night carried off by a party
of strange men, from a house in _Denmark Street_, near
St. Giles's church, where he had lived some time."
--_MS. Diary quoted in Collet's Relics of Literature_, p. 306.

EDWARD F. RIMBAULT.

* * * * *

QUERIES.

FOLK LORE.

_Metrical Charms_.--In the enumeration of the various branches of that interesting subject, the "FOLK LORE OF ENGLAND," on which communications were invited in the last number of "NOTES AND QUERIES," there is an omission which I beg to point out, as it refers to a subject which, I believe, deserves especial investigation, and would amply repay any trouble or attention that might be bestowed upon it. I allude to _Metrical Charms_, many of which are still preserved, and, in spite of the corruptions they have undergone in the course of centuries, would furnish curious and valuable illustrations of the Mythological System on which they are founded.

"Spirits of the flood and spirits of the hills found a
place in the mythology of Saxon England,"

says an able reviewer of Mr. Kemble's _Saxons in England_, in _The Anthenæum_ (13th Jan. 1849); and he continues,

"The spells by which they were invoked, and the forms
by which their aid was compelled, linger, however, still
amongst us, although their names and powers have passed
into oblivion. In one of the Saxon spells which
Mr. Kemble has inserted in the Appendix, we at once
recognised a rhyme which we had heard an old woman
in our childhood use,--and in which many Saxon words
unintelligible to her were probably retained."

Who would not gladly recover this "old rhyme?"--I can say for myself, that if these lines should ever meet the eye of the writer of the passage I have quoted, I trust he will be induced to communicate, in however fragmentary a shape, this curious addition to our present scanty stories of mythological information.

While on the subject of _Charms and Spells_, I would ask those who are more familiar than myself with the Manuscript treasures of the British Museum, and of our University Libraries, whether they have ever met with (except in MSS. of Chaucer) the remarkable "Night Spell" which the Father of English Poetry has preserved in the following passage of his _Miller's Tale_. I quote from Mr. Wright's edition, printed for the Percy Society:--

"'What Nicholas, what how man, loke adoun:
Awake and think on Cristes passioun
I crowche the from Elves and from Wightes.'
There with the night-spel seyde he anon rightes
On the foure halves of the hous aboute
And on the threissh-fold of the dore withoute.

"'Lord Jhesu Crist and seynte Benedight,
Blesse this hous from every wikkede wight
Fro nightes verray, the white Paternoster
When wonestow now, seynte Petres soster.'"

This charm has long occupied my attention, and as I hope shortly to submit to the Fellows of the Society of Antiquaries an attempt to illustrate some parts of it which are at present certainly involved in very great obscurity, I shall be glad to be informed whether any other early version of it is to be found in MS., and if so, where; and also whether any other version, corrupted or not, is still preserved, if not in use, at least in memory. I should also be especially glad of references of any other allusion to the "white Paternoster" or "seynte Petres soster," or for any information as to sources for ascertaining the history, whether authentic or legendary, of the personage supposed to be alluded to in the closing words of this remarkable spell.

WILLIAM J. THOMS.

* * * * *

ALLUSIONS IN THE HOMILIES.

_"A Good Wife," &c._, and _"God speed the Plough!"_--I should hold myself deeply indebted to any of your correspondents who would inform me where the two following quotations are to be found.

I have been anxiously looking for them for some years. I have taken some pains myself--{230} "I have poached in Suidas for unlicensed Greek"--have applied to my various antiquarian friends (many of whose names I was delighted to recognise among the brilliant galaxy that enlightened your first number)--but hitherto all in vain; and I am reduced to acknowledge the truth of the old proberb, "A ---- may ask more questions in an hour than a wise man can answer in seven years:"--

I. "For thus will most truly be verified the _saying of the
poet_, 'A good wife, by obeying her husband, shall bear the
rule, so that he shall have a delight and a gladness the sooner at
all times to return home to her.' But, on the contrary part, 'when
the wives be stubborn, froward, and malapert, their husbands are
compelled thereby to abhor and flee from their own houses, even as
they should have battle with their enemies.'"--_Homily on
Matrimony_, p. 450. ed. Oxford, 1840.

Query--_Who_ is the _poet?_

II. "Let no good and discreet subjects, therefore, follow the flag
or banner displayed to rebellions, and borne by rebels, though it
have the image of the plough painted therein, with _God speed the
plough_ written under in great letters, knowing that none hinder
the plough more than rebels, who will neither go to the plough
themselves, nor suffer other that would go unto it."--_Fourth
Part of the Homily against Wilful Rebellion_, p. 518.

In _what_ rebellion was such a banner carried?

These questions may appear very trifling; but each man has his hobby, and mine is, not to suffer a quotation to pass without verification.

It is fortunate that I am not a despotic monarch, as I would certainly make it felony without benefit of clergy to quote a passage without giving a plain reference.

L.S.

* * * * *

MINOR QUERIES

_Pope's Translations of Horace._--In a pamphlet against Pope, entitled, _A True Character of Mr. Pope and his Writings_, by the author of _The Critical History of England_, written in May, 1716, and printed in that year, Pope is reproached with having just published a "libellous," "impudent," and "execrable" _Imitation of Horace_. Twenty years later such a reproach would be very intelligible; but can any one favour me with a reference to any _Imitation of Horace_, published by Pope prior to 1716, of which any such complaint could be made?

C.

_Etymology of "Havior."_--Can any of your readers inform me what is the etymology of the word _Havior_, by which all park-keepers denote an emasculated male deer, affording good venison between the buck and doe season?

Never having seen the word written or printed, I am guided, in attempting to spell it, by the usual pronunciation.

BRAYBROOKE

Audley End, Feb. 2.

_Arabic Numerals_.--In the _Archæological Journal_ (vol. vi. p. 291.), it is stated that the earliest "example of the use of Arabic numerals in any work connected with building" is the date 1445, on the tower of Heathfield Church, Sussex, though "they were common in MSS. after 1320, and in astronomical Tracts as early as 1290." As it is probable that not a few instances of the employment of the Arabic numeral characters of an earlier date than that at Heathfield are to be met with in different parts of the country, will you permit me to make use of your paper to inquire whether any such are known to any of your readers, and if they will be so obliging as to communicate their knowledge through the medium of your columns? As the subject is one of considerable interest, it would be desirable that _any_ date belonging to the fifteenth or the early part of the sixteenth century should be made known, and registered in your valuable publication.

Permit me also to ask, in connection with this subject, for references to any works or treatises supplying information on the history of the Arabic numerals, their origin, and their introduction into Europe. I am already acquainted with Astle, _On Writing_, Wallis's _Algebra, Nouveau Traité de Diplomatique_, the _Huctiana_, Pegge's _Life of Grostête_, and the _Philosophical Transactions_; but I wish for additional, and, if possible, more recent information.

Does any one of your readers know what became of the MSS. formerly in the possession of the above-named Thomas Astle, formerly Keeper of the Tower Records? In Sir W. Burrell's Sussex collections in the British Museum are copies of charters, "ex MSS. penes T. Aste," with notices of curious seals appended, which I should be glad to be able to inspect.

E.V.

_Stephen Eiton, or Eden's "Acta Regis Edw. II._"--The interesting account of St. Thomas of Lancaster, with the appended queries (No. 12. p. 181.), reminds me of the work of Stephen Eiton or Eden, a canon-regular of Warter, in Yorkshire, entitled, "Acta Regis Edwardi iidi," which is said still to remain in manuscript. Where is it deposited?

T.J.

_Dog Latin._--Permit me also to ask, what is the origin of the expression "Dog Latin"?

T.J.

_The Cuckoo--the Welch Ambassador._--In Middleton's _A Trick to Catch the Old One_, Act iv. sc. 5., Dampet says:--

"Why, thou rogue of universality, do I not know thee? Thy
sound is like the cuckoo, the Welch Embassador."

And the editor of the continuation of Dodsley's _Collection_ remarks on the passage,--

"Why the cuckoo is called the Welch Embassador, I know not."

{231}Perhaps some of your readers can explain why the cuckoo is so called.

G.

_A recent Novel_.--Having lately met with an extremely rare little volume, the title of which runs thus: "La prise d'un Seigneur Ecossois et de ses gens qui pilloient les navires pescheurs de France, ensemble le razement de leur fort et le rétablissement d'un autre pour le service du Roi ... en la Nouvelle France ... par le sieur Malepart. Rouen, le Boullenger, 1630. 12o. 24pp." I was reminded of a modern novel, the principal scenes of which are laid in an island inhabited by a British nobleman of high rank, who, having committed a political crime, had been reported dead, but was saved by singular circumstances, and led the life of a buccaneer. Can any of your numerous readers be good enough to mention the title of the novel alluded to, which has escaped my memory?

ADOLPHUS.

_Authorship of a Couplet_.--Can you help me to the authorship of the following lines?--

"Th' unhappy have whole days, and those they choose;
The happy have but hours, and those they lose."

P.S.

_Seal of Killigrew, and Genealogy of the Killigrew Family_.--"BURIENSIS" (No. 13. p. 204.) is informed that the arms on the seal at Sudbury are certainly those of a member of the old Cornish house of Killigrew. These arms, impaled by those of Lower, occur on a monument at Llandulph, near Saltash, to the memory of Sir Nicholas Lower, and Elizabeth his wife, who died in 1638. She was a daughter of Sir Henry Killegrewe, of London, and a near relative, I believe, of the Master of the Revels.

While on this subject, I beg to put a query to your genealogical readers. The double-headed eagle, the bordure bizantée, and the demilion charged with bezants, are all evident derivations from the armorial bearings of Richard, titular king of the Romans, Earl of Cornwall, &c., second son of King John. The family of Killegrewe is of venerable antiquity in Cornwall. What I wish to ascertain is, the nature of the connection between the family and that unfortunate "king." Was it one of consanguinity, or merely one of feudal dependence?

MARK ANTONY LOWER.

*** See, on the origin of the arms of Richard and their derivatives, my _Curiosities of Heraldry_, pp. 309. et seq.

* * * * *

REPLIES.

SELAGO AND SAMOLUS.

In common with the mistletoe and vervain the Druids held the Selago and Samolus as sacred plants, and never approached them but in the most devout and reverential manner. When they were gathered for religious purposes the greatest care was taken lest they should fall to the earth, for it was an established principle of Druidism, that every thing that was sacred would be profaned if allowed to touch the ground; hence their solicitude to catch the anguinum:

"------------------When they bear
Their wond'rous egg aloof in air:
Thence before to earth it fall,
The Druid in his hallow'd pall
Receives the prize."

Pliny, in his _Natural History_ (lib. xxiv. cap. 11.) gives a circumstantial account of the ceremonies used by the Druids in gathering the Selago and Samolus, and of the uses to which they were applied:--

"Similis berbæ huie sabinæ est Selago appellata. Legitur
sine ferro dextra manu per tunicam, qua sinistra
exuitur velut a furante, candida veste vestito, pureque
lotis nudis pedibus, saero facto priusquam legatur,
pane vinoque. Fertur in mappa nova. Hanc contra omnem
perniciem habendam prodidere Druidæ Gallorum, et contra
omnia oculorum vitia fumum ejus prodesse.

"Iidem Samolum herbam nominavere nascentem in humidis:
et hanc sinistra manu legi a jejunis contra morbos suum
boumque, nec respicere legentem: nec alibi quam in
canali, deponere, ibique conterere poturis."

From the very slight manner in which these plants are described by Pliny, it is next to impossible to identify them with any degree of certainty, though many attempts for the purpose have been made. So far as I know, Pliny is the only ancient author who mentions them, and we have therefore nothing to guide us beyond what he has said in this passage.

The word Selago is supposed to be derived from _se_ and _lego_, i.e. _quid certo ritu seligeretur_. Linnæus appropriated the name to a pretty genus of Cape plants, but which can have nothing whatever to do with the Selago of the Druids. It has been thought to be the same as the Serratula Chamæpeuce of Linnæus, but without sufficient reason, for Pliny says it resembles the savine; and Matthiolus, in his _Commentary on Dioscorides_, when speaking of the savine (Juniperus Sabina), says:--

"Siquidem vidi pro Sabina assumi quandam herbam
dodrantalem quæ quibusdam in montibus plurima nascitur,
folio tamaricis, licet nec odore nec sapore Sabinam
Hanc sæpius existimavi esse Selaginem referat. a Plinio
lib. xxiv. c. 11. commemoratam."

Samolus, or as some copies read Samosum, is said to be derived from two Celtic words, _san_, salutary, and _mos_, pig; denoting a property in the plant which answers to the description of Pliny, who says the Gauls considered the Samolus as a specific in all maladies of swine and cattle. {232}But there is not less difficulty in identifying this plant than in the former case. Some have thought it the same as the little marsh plant, with small white flowers, which Linnæus calls Samolus Valerandi, while others consider it to be the Anemone Pulsatilla. I am ignorant of the salutary properties of these plants, and must leave it to be decided which of them has the greatest claims to be considered the Samolus of Pliny.

G.M.

Is there any English translation of Ælian's _Various History_, or of the work ascribed to the same author on the _Peculiarities of Animals_?

East Winch. Jan. 1850.

_Selago and Samolus_.--The Selago (mentioned by "PWCCA," No. 10. p. 157.), in Welsh _Gras Duw_ (Gratia Dei), was held by the Druids as a charm against all misfortunes; they called it _Dawn y Dovydd_, the gift of the Lord. They also ascribed great virtues to the Samolus, which was called _Gwlydd_, mild or tender. All that can be known respecting the Selago and Samolus, may be seen in Borlase's _Antiquities of Cornwall_.

GOMER.

* * * * *

ÆLFRIC'S COLLOQUY.

In the Anglo-Saxon _Gloss_, to Ælfric's Latin dialogue, _higdifatu_ is not, I conceive, an error of the scribe, but a variation of dialect, and therefore, standing in no need of correction into _hydigfatu_ ("NOTES and QUERIES," No. 13.). _Hig, hi_ and _hy_, are perfectly identical, and nothing is more usual in A.S. than the omission of the final _g_ after _i_; consequently, _hig=hy, di=dig_, therefore _higdi=hydig_. Mr. Singer's reading of _cassidilia_ for _culidilia_, I consider to be well-founded.

His conjecture, that _sprote_=Goth. _sprauto_, has something very specious about it, and yet I must reject it. That useful and sagacious author, Dr. Kitchener, tells us, that there is only one thing to be done in a hurry (or _sprauto_); and even if he had not informed us what that one thing is, very few indeed would ever have imagined that it was _fish_-catching. The word _sprote_ was a puzzle to me, and I had often questioned myself as to its meaning, but never could get a satisfactory answer; nor was it until some time after the publication of the 2nd edition of my _Analecta_ that it occurred to me that it might signify a wicker or _sallow_ basket (such as is still in use for the capture of eels), from Lat. _sporta_, whence the German _sportel_. My conjecture, of _salice_ for the _salu_ of the text, was based on the possibility that the apparatus might somehow or other be made of the _salix_.

I beg leave to inform "SELEUCUS," that _The Phoenix_, with an English version, and with the Latin original, is to be found in the _Codex Exoniensis_, edited by me, in 1842, for the Society of Antiquaries. The Latin ascribed to Lactantius, is printed in the Variourum edition of Claudian, and, I believe, in the editions of Lactantius.

Jan. 30, 1850.

B. THORPE.

* * * * *

PORTRAITS OF LUTHER AND ERASMUS.

Your correspondent, "R.G." (No. 13. p. 203.), is correct in supposing the _wood-cut_ portrait of Luther to be that which is prefixed to the treatise "De Captivitate Babylonica Ecclesiæ," where he is habited as a monk; but it was evidently only a copy from the very interesting copper-plate engraving of his friend Lucas Cranach, bearing the date 1520, of which a very accurate copy was prefixed to the translation of "Luther's Way to Prayer," published by Mr. Pickering in 1846. Juncker's book is a very good repertory of the various representations of the great reformer, but the prints are generally but faithless copies. In 1750 Kirchmayer printed an especial disquisition upon the portrait by Lucas Cranach of 1523, under the following title:--"Disquisitio Historia de Martini Lutheri Oris et Vultus Habitu Hervieo ad vivum expresso in Imagine divine pencilli Lucæ Cranachj patris in ære hic incisa," &c., Wittebergæ Sax. 1750, 4to. The works in which the Germans have sought to do honour to their great protestant saint, are numerous enough to fill a small library but two of them are so remarkable as to deserve notice, 1. "Luther's Merkwürdige Lebensumstande bey seiner Medicinalischen Leibesconstitution, Krankheiten, geistlichen und leiblichen Anfectungen und andern Zufallen, &c., von F.G. Keil," Leipsig, 1764. 2. "Luther's Merkwürdige Reisegeschichte zu Erganzung seiner Lebensumstande, von Jo. Th. Lingke," Leipsig, 1769, 4to. The earliest wood-cut representation of Erasmus with which I am acquainted is a medallion accompanying another of Ulric of Hutten, on the title-page of the following work of the unfortunate but heroic champion of the Reformation:--"Ulrichi ab Hutten cum Erasmo Rotirodamo, Presbytero, Theologo, Expostulatio." There is reason to believe that this Expostulation was printed only a short month before Hutten died; and, though it bears neither date nor name of printer, that it was printed by Johannes Schott, at Strasburg, in the month of July, 1523. It has another portrait of Hutten at the end, the whole strikingly spirited and characteristic; by some they have been attributed to Holbein, and if not by him, which is doubtful, they are at least worthy of him.

One would gladly forget this strife between the great promoter of learning and the soldier-scholar. Erasmus's conduct was unworthy of a great man, and can never be vindicated.

S.W.S.

* * * * *

{233} REPLIES TO MINOR QUERIES.

_Praise undeserved_.--The correct quotation, referred to in No. 14. p. 222., is

"Praise undeserved is _Satire_ in disguise."

It is by Mr. Br----st, author of a copy of verses called the _British Beauties_. I cannot fill up the "hiatus," which in this case is not "maxime deflendus," because I have now no time to search the Museum Catalogue. I apprehend that the author belonged to the "mob of gentlemen who wrote with ease," as it is something like Savage's "tenth transmitter" (which, by the bye, your correspondent, Mr. Gutch, should have said is _said_ to be Pope's)--his _only good_ line. Here is my authority:

EPIGRAM

_On a certain line of Mr. Br----, author of a copy of verses called the "British Beauties."--From the_ "GARLAND," _a collection of Poems_, 1721.

"When one good line did much my wonder raise
In Br----st's works, I stood resolved to praise;
And had, but that the modest _author_ cries,
_Praise undeserv'd is satire in disguise_."

I would add, that I believe this Epigram to be Dr. Kenrick's, Goldsmith's old persecutor in later years.

JAMES H. FRISWELL

_French Maxim_.--I beg to inform your correspondent "R.V." in reply to his query (No. 14. p. 215.), that the maxim quoted is the 218th of Rochefoucauld: "L'hypocrisie est un hommage que le vice rend à la vertu."

J.H.F.

_Singular Motto_.--The "singular motto" which occasions "P.H.F.'s" wonder (No. 14. p. 214.), is, without doubt, a cypher, and only to be rendered by those who have a Key. Such are not unfrequent in German, Austrian, or Bohemian Heraldry.

J.H.F.

_Discurs. Modest._--At p. 205. No. 13., your correspondent N. replies to A.T.'s query, that "there can be no reasonable doubt, that the _original_ authority for _Rem transubstantiationis patres ne altigisse quidem_, is William Watson in his _Quodlibet_, ii. 4. p. 31."

By a note of mine, I find that this secular priest, W. Watson, lays the expression in question to the charge of the Jesuits as "an heretical and most dangerous assertion of theirs." Admitting, therefore, the _Discurs. Modest_. to have been published after Watson's _Decacordon_, i.e. later than 1602 (which can hardly be doubted), still the further question remains to be asked: "In what writings of the Jesuits, prior to 1602, had W. Watson himself found these words, with which he charges them?" Should you think this further query of importance enough to find a place in your paper, perhaps some one of your readers might throw yet another ray of light upon this subject.

J.S.

Oxford

_Pallace_ (No. 13. p. 202).--Mr. Halliwell, in his _Dictionary of Archaic, &c. Words_, explains this word as used in Devonshire:--

"_Palace_, a Storehouse."--_Devon_. "At Dartmouth,
I am told there are some of these storehouses, called
palaces, cut out of the rock, still retaining the name."
--_MS Devon. Gloss_.

C.W.G.

_Meaning of "Pallace_".--The term "Pallace" (No. 13. p. 202.) is applied in Totnes to denote a landing-place inclosed by walls, but not roofed in. Many of these "pallaces" have been converted into coal-cellars. Perhaps _pales_ may have been used originally to form these inclosures in lieu of walls;--and hence the word "pallace" would mean a place paled in. I find repeated mention made of "pallaces" in a schedule attached to a deed of the Corporation of Totnes, bearing date September 18th, 1719, a copy of which is now before me, and from it the following extracts are taken:--

"One linney and two _pallaces_ or yards."

"All those houses, rooms, cellars, and _pallaces_."

"All that great cellar lately rebuilt, and _the plott of ground
or pallace_ thereto belonging lately converted into a cellar."

"All that little cellar and _pallace_ lately rebuilt, and
the kay or landing place thereto belonging, and near adjoyning
unto and upon the river Dart."

"And the little _pallace_ or _landing-place_."

_Apropos_ of _landing-places_, it may interest some of your readers to learn that the _very stone_ upon which Brutus, the nephew of Æneas, landed at Totnes, still remains! It is inserted in the foot-way nearly opposite the Mayoralty-house in the Fore Street. From Totnes, the neighbouring shore was heretofore called _Totonese_: and the _British History_ tells us, that _Brutus_, the founder of the British nation, arrived here; and _Havillanus_ [John de _Alvilla_ or _Hauteville_, according to Mr. Wright] as a poet, following the same authority, writes thus:--

"Inde dato cursu, _Brutus_ comitatus Achate
Gallorum spoliis cumulatis navibus aequor
Exarat, et superis auraque faventibus usus,
_Littora felices intrat Totonesia portus_."

"From hence great Brute with his Achates steer'd,
Full fraught with Gallic spoils their ships appear'd;
The Winds and Gods were all at their command,
_And happy Totnes shew'd them grateful land_."

_Gibson's Camden_.

Totnes is made mention of the _Lais de Marie_:--

"Il tient sun chemin tut avant.
A la mer vient, si est passer,
En _Toteneis_ est arriver."--_Lai d'Elidne_.

J. MILNER BARRY, M.D.

Totnes, Devon, Jan. 30. 1850.

{234} _Litany Version of the Psalms_.--The doubts produced by Beloe's self-contradicting statements on the subject of the Bishops' Bible, which are referred to by "X.X." (No. 13. p. 203.), may thus be settled. The first edition of this Bible, printed in 1568, contains a new translation of the Psalms by Becon. In the second folio edition, 1572, are inserted, in opposite columns, "the translation according to the Ebrewe," which differs but little from the former, in Roman letter, and "the translation used in common prayer," or that of the Great Bible, printed by Whitchurch, 1553, in black letter.

The clarum et venerabile nomen associated with the Bishops' Bible, a very magnificent and perfect copy of which is now open before me, suggests the inquiry whether there is any copy known of Archbishop Parker's rare volume on the English Church, 1572, which is not noticed by Martin in the list of eighteen which he had discovered. He does not mention that in the Chetham library.

T. JONES.

_Tempora mutantur &c_.--In reply to your correspondent, "E.V." (No. 14. p. 215.), I beg to state, that the _germ_ of "Tempora mutantur, et nos mutamur in illis," is to be found in the _Delitiæ Poetarium Germanorum_, vol. i. p. 685., under the Poems of Matthias Borbonius. He considers them as a saying of Lotharius I. (flor. Cir. 830.):--

"Omnia mutantur, nos et mutamur in illis;
Illa vices quasdam res habet, illa suas."

I sent this communication, some years ago, to _Sharpe's Magazine_, where it will be found, vol. v. p. 208.

L.S.

_Pandoxare_.--Your correspondent, "H.B." (No. 13. p. 202.), has lighted upon a curious specimen of domestic hieroglyphics, the notice of which recalls to mind the quaint marginal symbols scattered over the inventories of the Exchequer Treasury, at a much earlier period. They are not devoid of information or interest. The word of which he requests explanation, is, indeed, of too base Latinity to be found in the _Facciolati_, or even in the _Auctarium_; but in our old Latin dictionaries, sources of abundant information on obsolete expressions, the word is readily to be found. Old Gouldman, for instance, whose columns are replete with uncommon and local English terms, gives "_Pandoxor_, to brew," citing Alciatus as authority, and "_Pandox_, a swill-bowl," apparently a word used by Statius. It is obviously a barbarous derivative of the same Greek words as _Pandocium_ or _Pandoxarium_ ([Greek: pan] and [Greek: docheion]), the hostelry open to all comers. If, however, a more recondite authority for the explanation of the word, as formerly used in England, be desired, I would refer your querist to the pages of the _Promptorium Parvulorum_, where may be found--"Bruwyn ale or other drynke, _Pandoxor_. Browstar, or brewere, _Pandoxator, Pandoxatrix_", the medieval Bass or Guinness having been, most frequently, a female. And, having cited the primitive lexicographer of Norfolk, I would seize the occasion to offer a note, in response to the numerous queries regarding the too tardy advance of the work in question, and to assure your readers, who may be interested in the publications of the Camden Society, that a further instalment of the _Promptorium_ is in forwardness, so that I hope to complete a considerable portion, in readiness for issue, early in the current year.

ALBERT WAY.

_Saint Thomas of Lancaster_.--Not having Brady at hand, I cannot tell what authorities he cites; but, as Mr. Milnes (No. 12. p. 181.) does not mention Rymer, he perhaps may not know that he will find in that collection some documentary evidence on the subject of this saint, if saint he was; for instance--

"_Super rumore Thomam nuper Comitem Lancastriæ miraculis
corruscuri_."--Rym. Foed. iii. p. 1033. A.D. 1323.
"Quod," adds the king, "moleste gerimus."

But Edward III. was of quite another mind, and urged his canonization of the Holy See. Witness Rymer:--

"_Ad Papam; pro canonisatione Thomae nuper Comitis
Lancastriæ_."--Foed. iv. p. 2. A.D. 1326.

And again--

"_Pro custodi_" (Weryngton mentioned by Mr. Milnes),
"_Capellæ ad montem ubi nuper comes Lancastriæ decollatus
fuit_."--Ib. p. 291.

It seems that the bodies of some of Thomas's accomplices were also supposed to have worked miracles; for we find an ordinance--

"_Contra Fingentes miracula fieri per inimicos Regis_."
--Rym. Foed. iv. p. 20. A.D. 1323.

Andrews says (_Hist_. i. 342.) that Richard II. renewed the application for Thomas's canonization; but he does not give his authority, and I have not time to look further through Rymer.

p. 184. _Jhon-John_.--I wonder Mr. Williams does not see that the _h_ is not "_introduced_" for any purpose; it is an integral part of the original name _Johannes_, which was contracted into _Johan_, and in French into _Jehan_.

p. 185. _Slang Phrases_.--"_A Rowland for an Oliver_" is no slang phrase of the eighteenth century; it is a proverbial expression as old as the days of the romances of _Roland_ and _Olivier_. The other two were phrases put into the mouths of two characters (Dr. Ollapod, in Colman's _Poor Gentleman_, and Young Rapid, in Morton's _Cure for the Heart-ache_), which grew into vogue only from the success of the actors Fawcett and Lewis, and had no meaning or allusion beyond what the words obviously meant.

C.

{235}_Full of Rain in England._--"ROYDON" (No. 11. p. 73) will find the average quantity of rain fallen at Greenwich, for twenty-five years, 1815 to 1839, in a very useful and clever pamphlet, price 1s., by J.H. Belville, of the Royal Observatory, published by Taylor, Red Lion Court, Fleet Street, called _Manual of the Mercurial and Aneroid Barometers._

HENRY WILKINSON

_Judas Bell_--(No. 13, p. 195). In the "Flyting of Dunbar and Kennedie," a singular Scotch Poem, composed in the former half of the 16th century, and printed in Ramsay's _Evergreen_, the following passage occurs (_Everg._ vol. ii. p. 74.):--

"A Benefice quha wald give sic a Beist,
But gif it were to jingle _Judas bells_?
Tak thee a Fiddle or a Flute to jest,
Undocht thou art, ordained for naithing ells."

The Judas bells may probably have been used in the Easter-eve ceremonies, in connexion with which we find _Judas candles_ mentioned. See Brand's _Popular Antiq._ by Sir H. Ellis, vol. i. p. 29.

C.W.G.

_Boduc or Boduoc on British Coins_.--The real name of the heroic queen of the Iceni is very uncertain. Walther (Tacitus, xiv. Ann. c. 31.), adopts Boudicea. It is probable enough that the syllables Boduo may have formed a part of it, as pronounced by the Britons. We are reminded of Boduognatus, leader of the Nervii, mentioned by Cæsar. But to come nearer home, the name Boduogenus is found upon a bronze vessel discovered in the Isle of Ely, described by Mr. Goddard Johnson, _Archæologia_, xxviii. p. 436.

C.W.G.

_Lord Bacon's Metrical Version of the Psalms._--Lord Bacon's translation of seven psalms, the 1st, 12th, 90th, 104th, 126th, 127th, and 149th, with a Dedication to George Herbert, is found at the end of the 2nd vol. of his works. (Lond. 1826.) They were printed at London, 1625, in quarto.

C.W.G.

[To this we may add, on the information of X.X., that some account
of these Psalms, with specimens, may be seen in Holland's
_Psalmists of Britain_, 1824.]

_A "Gib" Cat._--What is the etymology of the term "Gibbe," as applied to the male cat? I may observe that the _g_ is pronounced _hard_ in this locality, and not _jibbe_, as most dictionaries have it.

Burnley, Lancashire.

T.T.W.

Comments

Log in to leave a comment.

Notes and Queries, Number 15, February 9, 1850Chapter I: Part 1

0%36 min left in chapter