Chapter I: Part 1

THE COMPLETE ENGLISH
WING SHOT

UNIFORM WITH THIS VOLUME

THE COMPLETE MOTORIST
THE COMPLETE GOLFER
THE COMPLETE PHOTOGRAPHER

H.M. THE KING AS A BOY
]

THE
COMPLETE ENGLISH WING SHOT

BY
G. T. TEASDALE-BUCKELL

WITH FIFTY-THREE ILLUSTRATIONS

NEW YORK: McCLURE, PHILLIPS & CO.
LONDON: METHUEN & CO.
1907

------------------------------------------------------------------------

PREFACE

When the publishers asked me to write a book upon Shooting and its interest, I at first doubted whether I knew enough of the matter to fill a book of much size without repeating all the traditional lore that is to be found in every unread text-book, but I had no sooner undertaken the business than I came to a conclusion that has since been confirmed, that to deal as best I could, with the kind help of many sportsmen, with the controversial subjects would have taken the whole space at my disposal for any one of them. Consequently, ever and again I have had to decide what to eliminate, and I have tried to leave out that which most people know already, and to deal as best I can in short space with questions that are now more or less under discussion, and consequently those that game preservers and shooters in this and other countries are thinking about. It has been very difficult to draw a line between the controversial and current subjects and the unchallenged facts which have been too often repeated already, but that this is the right principle is, I think, obvious from the position that the opposite course would involve. What is meant can be best explained by glancing at a few traditional survivals in gunnery and shooting, and its accompanying unnatural history, which, along with many others, would occupy space if one were to attempt to deal with all the accepted, as well as the repudiated, statements upon them. Nobody wants to be told that he should put the powder into a cartridge-case before the shot, but to begin at the beginning would involve the necessity of giving that and other puerile information. Nobody would be the better for a learned chapter on gun actions. In the first place, these actions are no longer patents, they are open to anyone who likes to use them, and consequently the days when one selected a gun-maker because his patent action was conceived to be the better, are long gone by. The reason is that each gun-maker can be trusted to use the best principle when he has a choice of them all, or at least the best available for the money to be expended upon its making in the gun. Ejectors are nearly in the same position; but single triggers are not. I was so fortunate as to make a discovery in regard to single triggers that is now acknowledged to be of great assistance to the gun trade; the want of it had for a hundred years been the stumbling-block to the patent single triggers that had begun to trouble gun-makers in the time of the celebrated Colonel Thornton. That is referred to in its proper chapter, because single triggers now occupy the place that formerly actions held, and at a later date ejector systems usurped, in assisting to the selection of a gun-maker.

To begin at the beginning in the repudiation of frequently accepted fallacy possibly would not compel a reference to the sometime beliefs that hares change their sex; that skylarks fall into snakes’ mouths after their skyward song—a statement that troubled Mr. Samuel Pepys, who, as Secretary to the Admiralty under two protectors and two monarchs, and as a member of the Royal Society, should have been in a position to get the best information. Nor would such a beginning involve the repudiation of the belief once held that bernicle geese turned into “bernacle” molluscs, or _vice versâ_. But it would oblige an author to enter into repudiation of the oft-stated belief that nitro powder is quicker than black powder, although big and heavily charged caps have to be employed for the nitro, whereas the small were amply sufficient for black powder. One would also be obliged to point out that the oft-repeated prophecy, that the smallest stock of grouse bred the better August crop, has been doomed to disaster always, and that precisely the reverse is true. However, there are still people who by what they say must be judged to hold to the unproved proposition that the stones breed grouse.

COL. THORNTON’S PLUTO (BLACK) AND JUNO. BY GILPIN. SHOWING
WHOLE-COLOURED POINTERS SIMILAR IN FORMATION TO THOSE OF SUTTON
SCARSDALE TO-DAY
]

It would be necessary also to point out that some parrot cries are a hundred years old and at least forty years out of date, but are still repeated as if they were original and true. Some of these are that pointers have better noses than setters, and also require less water; that cheese affects dogs’ noses (sanitation by means of carbolic acid does so, but cheese is harmless enough); that Irish setters have more stamina and pace than any others. The latter statement I have seen disproved for forty years at the field trials in this country, and the former has always failed to find corroboration at the champion stamina trials in America. I have had great chances of forming an accurate opinion, as I entered and ran dogs at the English championship trials over thirty-six years ago, and I am the only one who has ever judged at the champion trials of both England and America.

It would be necessary also to repudiate the mistake that “foot scent” is something exuding from the pad of an animal and left upon the ground by the contact of the feet. It would be necessary to affirm that fat from the adder is not the best cure for the poison when dog or man is bitten, but that raw whisky taken inwardly in large doses is; and as dogs will sometimes point these vipers, it might be well to affirm that these creatures do not swallow their young, as is commonly supposed. It would be necessary also to state that when partridges “tower” they are not necessarily, but only sometimes, hit in the lungs, but have often received a rap on the head just not enough to render them totally unconscious; and a case has lately been reported where two unshot-at partridges in one covey “towered” and fell, and were caught alive, grew stronger, and upon one of them being killed it was found to be badly attacked by enteritis, and not by lung disease. And consequently the myth about “towered” partridges always falling dead and on their backs does not require dealing with, as might have been the case a quarter of a century ago, when nevertheless the phenomenon was only misunderstood in the laboratory, and not in the field of sport.

It is hardly necessary to assert that “pheasant disease” as commonly seen in the rearing-fields is not fowl enteritis, as it is so often said to be, because the foster-mothers are hardly ever affected by any illness when their chicks are dying by hundreds of _the_ disease. _The_ pheasant disease has never been subjected to pathological examination and investigation.

To start at the beginning would make it necessary to state that the “muff ’cock,” or the bigger woodcock, that comes in a separate migration, is not the hen of the smaller birds, and that distinction can only be made between the sexes by internal examination of the organs. It might be necessary in similar circumstances to say that woodcock and snipe do not live on suction, as is often believed even now; that nightjars and hedgehogs neither suck the milk of goats nor cows; that foxes do not prefer rats and beetles to partridges and pheasants; that swallows do not hibernate at the bottom of ponds; that badgers do not prefer young roots to young rabbits; that ptarmigan and woodcock are not mute, and that the former do not live on either stones or heather; that badgers can run elsewhere than along the sides of a hill, and that they are not compelled, by having the legs on one side shorter than on the other, to always take this curious course, which would involve them in the difficulty of having to entirely encircle a hill before getting back to their holes; nevertheless, this faith is still held in some parts of the country, just as it is said that the heather bleating of the snipe is a vocal sound, whereas it is often made simultaneously with the vocal sound.

I have tried to avoid dealing with any such things as these, which may be supposed to come within the region of common knowledge of any beginner in shooting, but another point has troubled me more. I have written a good deal for the press. Articles of mine have appeared in _The Times_, _The Morning Post_, _The Standard_, _The Daily Telegraph_, _The County Gentleman_, _Bailey’s Magazine_, _The Sporting and Dramatic_, _The Badminton Magazine_, _Country Life_, _The Field_, _The Sportsman_, _The National Review_, _The Fortnightly Review_, _The Monthly Review_, and elsewhere, and I am afraid that I have unconsciously repeated the ideas running through some of these articles, without acknowledgment to the various editors.

As Colonel Hawker went to school in gunnery to Joe Manton, so did Joe Manton go to school to Hawker in the matter of sport. But we have changed. That those who make guns can best teach how to make guns I do not doubt for a moment; that when they write books on the making of guns those books are regarded as an indirect advertisement is inevitable, but they are none the worse for that, if readers know how to read between the lines, and it is not necessary to go to a shooting school to do that. But when gun-makers add to their business by means of books upon sport and by “shooting schools,” they are turning the tables on us. To that I have no objection. But when it is asserted that shooting schools teach more than the sport itself, as has lately been done, then I think it is time to protest that even if they could teach shooting at game as well as game teaches it (which is absurd), that even then they cannot teach sportsmanship, of which woodcraft is one part and the spirit of sport and fellowship another.

But the greatest value of sportsmanship is, after all, that idle man should be the more healthy an animal for his idleness. Consequently, when shooting parties are made an excuse for more smoke and later nights than usual, even if the shooting is not spoiled next day, less enjoyment of life follows, and lethargically apparent becomes the missing of that perfect dream of health, that reaction after great exertion ought to bring to those who have ever felt it.

It is often said that big bags have ruined the sporting spirit. That is not so: big bags are necessary proofs that the science of preservation of game is on the right lines, and their publication is also necessary on these grounds. At the same time, it is a fact that hard walking is not appreciated as much as it was thirty years ago, and ladies can now take just as forward a place in the shooting of game and deer as men can or do. This is not all because ladies are better trained physically, but because sports have been made much easier, than formerly they were. Bridle-paths enable ponies to traverse the deer forests with ladies on their backs, and where that can be done deer stalking is not quite what it was when a Highland laird declared that he saw no use in protecting the deer, since nobody could do them much harm. But the wonder to me is not that we do not like great exertion, but that we ever did like it for itself. But then I speak as a man in years, and one who has in the foolishness of youth killed a stag and carried home his head, cut low down, for sixteen miles, rather than wait for the tardy ponies to bring it in with the carcase.

I suspect that a change of ideas will take place when it is discovered that driven-game shooting can, more than any other, be learnt at the shooting schools, and that when the trick is known it becomes the easiest kind of shot. If it is true that the schools can teach it, then everybody will learn it, and what is common property will become as unfashionable as it is the reverse at present. I believe that half the difficulty in the driven bird is in thinking it is difficult. The fastest bird at 30 yards range one is likely to meet with in a whole season does not require a swing of the muzzle faster than, or much more than half as fast as, a man can walk. What is difficult in driven game is shooting often, the swerve of the game, the changes of pace and angle of different birds in quick succession, but distinctly not the pace. Before I had ever seen a grouse butt, I remember sitting down to watch another party of shooters on a distant hill, more than half a mile up wind of where I sat to watch. I saw their dogs point, and a single bird rise, which, with many a switchback as it came, I watched traverse the whole distance between us, and I killed it as I sat. That was my first driven grouse, but it is not by any means why I say that driven game offers the easiest kind of shooting; it is because the average of kills to cartridges are so much better than they are in other kinds of shooting. Take, for instance, double rises at pigeons, which are easy compared with double rises at October grouse, and it will be noted that the crack pigeon shots do not generally kill even their first double rise at 25 yards range, and that four or five double rise kills are nearly always good enough to win, as also very often is a single double rise with both birds killed. Very moderate grouse drivers can do better than that, and pheasants that are not very high are slain in much greater proportion. The fact is that all shooting is extremely difficult if one attempts to satisfy the most severe critic of all, namely the man who shoots. But at my age I would much rather think myself fit to do a day’s hard walking than a day’s hard shooting. I think there are a good many people of that opinion, otherwise dog moors would not make more rent per brace than the Yorkshire driving moors, but they do. The trouble is that places where birds will lie to dogs are limited, and it is childish to drive packs of birds away for the sake of thinking one is shooting over dogs when one is not shooting at all, but only doing mischief. Personally, I would not try to shoot over good dogs on Yorkshire grouse. Bad ones would not matter; but then they would give me no pleasure.

When it was a literary fashion to abuse covert shooting as butchery and grouse driving as no sport, it was not done by sportsmen of the other school; and later, when the literary genius of the period was turned in the opposite direction, and we were constantly being told that a walk with a gun and dog was pleasant but no sport, it was only done by those who were a little afraid of being out of the fashion. I have been so unfashionable as to defend both by turns, and I have always been of opinion that any sport which appeared to be growing unpopular was worthy of the little support I could give it. It will probably greatly surprise those who dare not, with imaginative pens, shoot at the tail of a bird, to be told that Mr. R. H. Rimington Wilson recently informed me, that if he were to back himself to kill a number of shots consecutively he would select driven birds in preference to walked-up game; and besides, that he preferred to be let loose on a snipe bog to his own, or any other, big driving days. My opinion has been that you can always make any sort of shooting a little more difficult than your own performance can satisfactorily accomplish to the gratification of your own most critical sense.

Driving game and big bags are often, but not always, acts of game preserving.

On this subject I had written a chapter, but fearing that I had not done that view justice, after a conversation I had with Captain Tomasson, who has Hunthill and is the most successful Scotch grouse preserver by the all driving method, I asked him to criticise some articles I had previously written in the _Field_, the sense of which I have tried to express again in the following pages. He very kindly did so, or rather stated the case for the Highlands, which I have substituted for mine. It only differs in one respect from the sense of my own suppressed chapter—namely, it does not remark on the difficulty of explaining why, if recent Scotch driving has partly defeated disease, even more Yorkshire driving, prior to 1873, nevertheless preceded the worst and most general Scotch and English disease ever known. However, everyone will argue for himself: I can only pretend to present a mass of facts to assist a judgment, but not a quarter of those I should like to give have I room for, and I regret that Captain Tomasson is even more restricted by space.

I have shot over spaniels in teams and as single dogs, but as I consider that I know less of them than Mr. Eversfield, who probably knows more than anyone else, I asked him to read and criticise my article, which he promised to do. But in returning it he has professed himself unable to criticise, and very kindly says that he likes it all, so I leave it, being thereby assured that it cannot be very wrong.

There is one subject connected with shooting, or the ethics of shooting, about which there is much more to be said than ever has been attempted—namely, that partridge preservers are now, and will be more in the future, indebted to the fox for their sport. This may appear a wild paradox, but before I am condemned for it I would, in the interests of the gun, ask those who disagree to read my chapters on partridge preserving, where, if they still disagree, they will find a partridge success described that will amply repay their good nature, unless they know a plan by which season’s partridge bags can be doubled, doubled again, and then again, in three consecutive years.

On the subject of dogs, I may say that thirty to thirty-five years ago I recommended to some American sportsmen three different sorts of setters. Either two of them had bred well together in England. These have been crossed together ever since in America, and no other cross has been admitted to the Stud Book devoted to them. They have been a revelation in the science of breeding domestic animals, for, in spite of all the in-breeding represented there, I was enabled to select a puppy in 1904 that in Captain Heywood Lonsdale’s hands has beaten all the English pointers and setters at field trials in 1906. I have more particularly referred to this in a chapter on English setters, and in another on strenuous dogs and sport in America.

I have already tendered my thanks, but I should like publicly to repeat my indebtedness, to those who have lent me the best working dogs in England for models, or have sent me photographs of them and other pictures. These include Mr. Eric Parker, Editor of _The County Gentleman_, Mr. W. Arkwright, the Hon. Holland Hibbert, Mr. Herbert Mitchell, Mr. C. C. Eversfield, Mr. A. T. Williams, Captain H. Heywood Lonsdale, Mr. B. J. Warwick, the Editor of _Bailey_, Mr. Allan Brown, and the President of the world’s oldest established, and National, Field Trial Society, namely Col. C. J. Cotes, of Pitchford Hall, who has sent me some photographs of his, and his late father’s, Woodcote pointers and retrievers, including an original importation of 1832, and founder of his present breed of the latter race, and in doing this he has been kind enough to say:—

“I have always considered you to know more about the breaking and breeding of setters than any man living, and that it was entirely through you that the apex of setter breeding was reached about twenty-five years ago, and through your recommendation I obtained the eight setters in 1881 that founded my present breed.”

I am glad to be able to quote this, because my name is little known to younger shooters, although I write many, preferably unsigned, articles upon rural sports and other matters.

G. T. T.-B.

CONTENTS

PAGE
ANCIENT ACTIONS 1

ANCIENT PISTOLS TO AUTOMATIC AND ELEPHANT RIFLES 4

ANCIENT AND MIDDLE AGE SHOOTING 13

ON THE CHOICE OF SHOT GUNS 23

SINGLE-TRIGGER DOUBLE GUNS 52

AMMUNITION 56

THE THEORY OF SHOOTING 63

THE PRACTICE OF SHOOTING 69

FORM IN GAME SHOOTING—I 76

FORM IN GAME SHOOTING—II 82

CRACK SHOTS—I 88

CRACK SHOTS—II 94

POINTERS AND SETTERS 101

THE POINTER 126

ENGLISH SETTERS 139

STRENUOUS DOGS AND SPORT IN AMERICA 151

THE IRISH SETTER 160

THE BLACK-AND-TAN SETTER 168

RETRIEVERS AND THEIR BREAKING 176

THE LABRADOR RETRIEVER 191

SPANIELS 195

GROUSE THAT LIE AND GROUSE THAT FLY 204

RED GROUSE 214

METHODS OF SHOOTING THE RED GROUSE 235

THE LATEST METHODS OF PRESERVATION OF PARTRIDGES 246

PARTRIDGE BAGS AND DRIVING 259

VARIETIES AND SPECIES OF THE PHEASANT 267

PHEASANTS 274

BRINGING PHEASANTS TO THE GUNS 292

SHOOTING WILD DUCKS ARTIFICIALLY REARED 302

WILD WILD-DUCK 308

RABBIT SHOOTING 318

HARES 323

SNIPE 329

WOODCOCKS 335

BLACK GAME 341

PIGEON SHOOTING 347

DEER IN SCOTLAND 354

BIG GAME 358

A VARIED BAG 361

DISEASES OF GAME BIRDS 370

INDEX 377

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS

H.M. THE KING AS A BOY _Frontispiece_

From a photograph lent by ERIC PARKER, Esq.

COL. THORNTON’S PLUTO (BLACK) AND JUNO, BY GILPIN,
SHOWING WHOLE-COLOURED POINTERS SIMILAR IN
FORMATION TO THOSE OF SUTTON SCARSDALE TO-DAY _Facing page_ vi

From Daniel’s _Rural Sports_, 1802.

WARTER PRIORY. LORD SAVILE SHOOTING 〃 32

From a photograph by Mr. H. LAZENBY, York.

WITH PLENTY OF FREEDOM FOR GOOD LATERAL SWING 〃 63

TAKING A STEP BACK WITH THE LEFT FOOT AS THE SHOT IS
FIRED SAVES THE BALANCE WHEN THE GAME HAS PASSED
FAR OVERHEAD BEFORE BEING SHOT AT 〃 66

H.R.H. THE PRINCE OF WALES AND LORD FARQUHAR RIDING
TO THE BUTTS ON THE BOLTON ABBEY MOORS, 1906 〃 69

From a photograph by Messrs. BOWDEN BROTHERS.

H.R.H. THE PRINCE OF WALES WAITING FOR GROUSE,
SHOWING THE MUCH MORE FORWARD POSITION OF THE LEFT
HAND THAN WHEN SHOOTING 〃 70

From a photograph by Messrs. BOWDEN BROTHERS.

H.R.H. THE PRINCE OF WALES SHOOTING GROUSE AT BOLTON
ABBEY, SHOWING THE VERY FORWARD POSITION OF THE
LEFT HAND 〃 72

From a photograph by Messrs. BOWDEN BROTHERS.

MR. R. H. RIMINGTON WILSON SHOOTING GROUSE, SHOWING
THE BACK POSITION OF THE LEFT HAND 〃 74

From a photograph by Messrs. BOWDEN BROTHERS.

WARTER PRIORY. LORD DALHOUSIE 〃 80

From a photograph by Mr. H. LAZENBY, York.

AT WARTER PRIORY. LORD LOVAT IN THE DALES 〃 84

From a photograph by Mr. H. LAZENBY, York.

MR. B. J. WARWICK’S COMPTON PRIDE, A POINTER WHICH
TWICE WON THE FIELD TRIAL CHAMPION STAKE 〃 101

From a photograph by the AUTHOR.

THE CELEBRATED FIELD TRIAL WINNING SETTER, CAPTAIN
H. HEYWOOD LONSDALE’S IGHTFIELD DUFFER 〃 101

From a photograph by the AUTHOR.

CAPTAIN H. HEYWOOD LONSDALE’S IGHTFIELD ROB ROY
POINTING, AND BACKED BY PITCHFORD RANGER 〃 106

From a photograph by Messrs. A. BROWN & CO.,
Lanark.

THE FAMOUS FIELD TRIAL WINNER SHAMROCK BELONGING TO
MR. ARKWRIGHT 〃 126

From a photograph by the OWNER.

SOLOMON’S SEAL AND SEALING WAX TRYING TO GET UP
HIGHER AND FEEL THE SCENT 〃 126

From a photograph by the Owner, Mr. ARKWRIGHT.

THREE OF MR. ARKWRIGHT’S WHOLE-COLOURED POINTERS:
LEADER, DESPATCH, AND LARGO 〃 127

From photographs by the OWNER.

THE SPANISH POINTER 〃 128

From a painting by G. STUBBS, engraved in
Daniel’s _Rural Sports_, 1802.

JUNO, A FAWN-COLOURED POINTER, BRED BY KING GEORGE
IV. IT IS SUGGESTIVE OF THE GREYHOUND, AND LIKE
MANY MODERN WHOLE-COLOURED POINTERS 〃 129

From an engraving by RICHARD PARR, after a
picture by G. H. LAPORT, in _The Sporting
Magazine_, 1834.

AN EARLY NINETEENTH-CENTURY PICTURE OF THE WOODCOTE
POINTERS, THE PROPERTY OF COL. C. J. COTES. HIS
FIELD TRIAL WINNERS PITCHFORD DRUCE AND PITCHFORD
DUKE ARE DESCENDED FROM HIS FATHER’S WOODCOTE
POINTERS 〃 132

COL. C. J. COTES’ CHAMPION FIELD TRIAL PITCHFORD
RANGER ON LORD HOME’S LANARK MOORS 〃 133

From a photograph by the AUTHOR.

COL. C. J. COTES’ CHAMPION FIELD TRIAL PITCHFORD
RANGER ON THE RUABON HILL 〃 133

From a photograph by Mr. ALLAN BROWN, Ruabon
Hill.

FIELD TRIAL WINNER PITCHFORD BEAUTY ON THE RUABON
HILL 〃 134

From a photograph by Mr. ALLAN BROWN, Ruabon
Hill.

FIELD TRIAL WINNER PITCHFORD BANG 〃 134

From a photograph by Miss GLADSTONE.

CAPTAIN STIRLING’S BRAG OF KEIR (FIELD TRIAL WINNER) 〃 134

From a photograph by the AUTHOR.

COL. C. J. COTES’ FIELD WINNER PITCHFORD DUKE ON THE
RUABON HILLS 〃 135

From a photograph by Mr. ALLAN BROWN, Ruabon
Hill.

COL. C. J. COTES’ FIELD WINNER PITCHFORD DUKE ON
LORD HOME’S MOORS IN LANARK 〃 135

From a photograph by the AUTHOR.

THE FIRST OF SEPTEMBER, by F. C. Turner 〃 139

Showing the character of the black-and-tan
setter before the bloodhound cross.

THE ENGLISH SETTER, by Reinagle 〃 144

From Scott’s _Sportsman’s Repository_, 1820.

With the exception of an ill-drawn hind leg and
near fore foot this is the correct formation.
The model had the shoulders, head, back, and
back ribs, rarely seen now except in
hard-working dogs.

MR. HERBERT MITCHELL’S LINGFIELD BERYL, WINNER OF
FIRSTS SIX TIMES IN SEVEN FIELD TRIAL OUTINGS IN
THE SPRING OF 1906 〃 145

From photographs by the OWNER.

CAPT. H. HEYWOOD LONSDALE’S FIELD TRIAL: IGHTFIELD
DOT AND IGHTFIELD ROB ROY, WITH SCOT THEIR BREAKER 〃 148

From a photograph by Messrs. A. BROWN, Lanark.

IGHTFIELD ROB ROY AND IGHTFIELD MAC, BELONGING TO
CAPTAIN H. HEYWOOD LONSDALE 〃 149

The former was victor on Lord Home’s Moors near
Lanark, in July 1906, over all English-bred
pointers and setters. The latter was winner of
the Puppy Stakes at the same time.

From a photograph by the AUTHOR.

MR. JOHN COTES’ IMPORTED LABRADOR, TIP, FROM AN OLD
PICTURE AT WOODCOTE 〃 176

The dog was whelped in 1832, and presented by
Mr. Portman to his owner. From this dog is
descended the field trial winner, Col. C. J.
Cotes’ Pitchford Marshal, and his Monk, an
intermediate generation. This dog is more like
the dogs at Netherby 45 years ago than is the
present race of Labradors.

From a photograph lent by the OWNER of the
picture.

COL. C. J. COTES’ PITCHFORD MARSHAL, SEVERAL TIMES A
FIELD TRIAL WINNER 〃 177

From a photograph lent by the OWNER.

COL. C. J. COTES’ MONK, AN INTERMEDIATE LINK BETWEEN
THE IMPORTED DOG TIP, OF 1832, AND MARSHAL, NOW IN
FULL VIGOUR. MONK IS SAID TO HAVE BEEN VERY FAST 〃 177

From a picture lent by the OWNER.

MR. A. T. WILLIAMS AND HIS CELEBRATED LIVER-COLOURED
FIELD TRIAL RETRIEVER DON OF GERWN 〃 180

From a photograph presented by Col. J. C. COTES.

MR. A. T. WILLIAMS’ DON OF GERWN (LIVER-COLOURED) 〃 181

MR. LEWIS WIGAN’S SWEEP OF GLENDARUEL (BLACK) 〃 181

THE HON. A. HOLLAND HIBBERT’S KENNEL OF LABRADOR
RETRIEVERS, 1901 〃 191

From a photograph presented by the OWNER.

THE HON. A. HOLLAND HIBBERT’S LABRADOR MUNDEN SINGLE 〃 192

From a photograph presented by the OWNER.

THE HON. A. HOLLAND HIBBERT’S MUNDEN SOVEREIGN 〃 192

From a photograph presented by the OWNER.

COL. C. J. COTES AND PITCHFORD MARSHAL, WITH HIS
BREAKER HARRY DOWNES 〃 193

From a photograph presented by the OWNER.

THE HON. A. HOLLAND HIBBERT AND MUNDEN SINGLE 〃 193

From a photograph presented by the OWNER.

MR. EVERSFIELD’S FIELD TRIAL WINNING ENGLISH
SPRINGER SPANIELS OF A LIVER-AND-WHITE BREED KEPT
FOR WORK ALONE IN THE FAMILY OF THE BOUGHEYS OF
AQUALATE FOR A HUNDRED YEARS. 〃 198

RED AND WHITE FIELD TRIAL WELSH SPRINGER SPANIELS
BELONGING TO MR. A. T. WILLIAMS 〃 199

From a photograph by Messrs. BOWDEN BROTHERS.

FIELD TRIAL ENGLISH SPRINGER SPANIELS OF THE
LIVER-AND-WHITE (AQUALATE) BREED BELONGING TO MR.
C. C. EVERSFIELD 〃 199

From a photograph by Messrs. BOWDEN BROTHERS.

PHEASANTS AT WARTER PRIORY. LORD LONDESBOROUGH AT
HIGH CLIFF 〃 274

From a photograph by Mr. H. LAZENBY, York.

A HIGHLAND DEER HEAD OF UNUSUALLY HEAVY BEAM—A
THIRTEEN POINTER 〃 354

From a photograph by Mrs. SMITHSON.

A FINE WILDLY TYPICAL NINE POINT HIGHLAND HEAD OF
38–INCH SPAN 〃 354

From a photograph by Mrs. SMITHSON.

A TYPICAL HIGHLAND RED DEER IMPERIAL HEAD, THIRTEEN
POINTS 〃 355

From a photograph by Mrs. SMITHSON.

A TYPICAL NEW ZEALAND ROYAL HEAD 〃 355

By permission of the Editor of _County
Gentleman_.

TYPICAL STAG OF TEN POINTS, SHOT IN KASHMIR BY COL.
SMITHSON 〃 356

From a photograph by Col. SMITHSON.

STAG OF THIRTEEN POINTS, SHOT IN KASHMIR BY MRS.
SMITHSON 〃 356

From a photograph by Mrs. SMITHSON.

THE COMPLETE SHOT

ANCIENT ACTIONS

By far the greatest inventions in gunnery have been made by chemists. The cleverness and boldness of many wonderful inventions for loading at the breech all aimed at the well-nigh impossible. The powder was always ignited from without, and had to be either partly or quite loose in order to facilitate ignition by means of external fire. That is what beat the inventors of five centuries, who were for ever trying to find a breech-loader, a revolver, or a magazine weapon. In default of these working satisfactorily, they tried weapons with seven barrels, and others with fewer. But it was all to little purpose; the detonator had not been discovered by the Rev. A. J. Forsyth, and the chemist to the French army of Louis XV. had not then invented fulminate of mercury. Consequently a closed-up cartridge containing its own means of ignition was impossible, for although detonating substances were known years before, they were such as did not always wait to be detonated—in other words, they were not stable. They were too dangerous for use, but nevertheless the attempts made at breech-loaders, and especially at magazines, were more than equally dangerous. One weapon had eight touch-holes in eight positions in the barrel, which was eight times charged, one load and charge upon top of the next. That nearest the muzzle was fired first (if the weapon was ever fired at all), and so on, down to that nearest the breech. What prevented the first igniting the rest, and sending all off together with a burst weapon, is not known. If they did not go off all together, one would suppose the firing of several loads in succession would give to those loads in the breech the best ramming ever known. But for this ramming to excess this invention went very near to a more perfect success than any modern magazine weapon. The trouble with all the latter is what to do with the empty cartridge-case. But this old weapon had no cartridge-case. Its ignition was from the outside, and was always ready. It is true that the difference of length of movement of shot within the barrel would make some difference to the velocity of each shot, but not more than would be equalised by a very small extra dose of powder for those charges nearest the muzzle.

Another form of repeater was a breech-loader which carried several charges of powder in the stock, which, in turn, were shaken into a revolving chamber, in front of which, before it was in place for firing, the bullet was inserted for each load, as its turn came round. Other repeaters were simple revolvers, much like the weapon in use now, but of course used without cartridges of self-contained ignition material.

Indeed, the ingenuity expended on breech-loading before the advent of detonating powder for ignition was really greater than the more modern efforts to do a much more simple thing. At the same time, had they succeeded, as they very nearly did, by doing without a removable cartridge-case, they would have accomplished that which is still required for the perfect working of magazine and automatic weapons.

The most elaborate of all the old repeaters was a revolving double-chambered German weapon. It had ten chambers, and each of these carried two charges, with a touch-hole for each. The majority of the old breech-loaders had movable blocks on the principle of the Martini, but instead of the hinged blocks being solid, as in that weapon, they were mostly hollowed out to take the charge and the bullet; sometimes held in a cartridge, but generally with the powder loose, and always loose when in the chamber, in order that there should be free communication with the touch-hole.

Sometimes the barrel was hinged in order to drop down at right angles with the stock, and this was really the forerunner of our drop-down guns of to-day, which are consequently some centuries old in principle, and had it not been for the absence of detonators there would have been nothing left for the nineteenth century to invent.

It has been said that the Prussians were first to take up the principle of the breech-loader for war, but that refers only to the detonated modern breech-loader. Some of the soldiers in the American War of Independence were armed with the breech-loader already mentioned, in which the trigger guard unscrewed the opening into the breech; but although this invention was possibly the soundest in joining of all the old ones, it was slow, and probably was not much used for that reason.

The Venetians had ships armed with cannon as early as 1380 A.D., and in Henry VIII.’s reign the wrecked _Mary Rose_ carried _breech_-loaders, designed on a principle which may possibly have suggested the wire guns of the present. The tube of iron or brass (for both were used) was surmounted by rings of iron which had evidently been slipped over the tube and hammered on while red-hot. These then contracted upon cooling, and pinched the bore smaller, so that, intentionally or not, the bore was made to expand to its original size upon an explosion occurring before any stress was put on the metal of the internal surface by the powder-gas. That is to say, all the first part of the strain went to expand the rings on the outside of the gun before the inside had reassumed its natural dimensions; or, in other words, the tension between the external big circumference and the internal small one was equalised, just on the same principle as it is in the latest big guns. This is known, because some of the _Mary Rose’s_ big guns were got up from the sea about half a century ago. She was over-weighted, and it is quite probable that her loss had a good deal to do with teaching the nation that before everything a warship must be handy, so that, when the Spaniards sent their great ships to fight Elizabeth, her smaller craft, and Britain’s uncertain weather, between them sank or squandered the whole Spanish fleet.

ANCIENT PISTOLS TO AUTOMATIC AND ELEPHANT RIFLES

Italy has the credit of the invention of the pistol, which came into being soon after the designing of the wheel-lock and the rifling of barrels. Caminelleo Vitelli of Pistoia made the first about 1540. It was in the manufacture of these small weapons that gun-makers from this date to the beginning of the nineteenth century excelled. The workmanship was generally of a high order, and the ornamentation, especially of some of the German specimens, was extremely artistic.

Moreover, during the flint and steel age, some double-barrelled pistols were built with two locks and only one trigger. Although these weapons worked quite perfectly, it must not be assumed that the makers of these pistols could have made a double shoulder gun to work satisfactorily with but one trigger. That difficulty was overcome at the end of the nineteenth century; but even then the clever designers had not discovered exactly what the former trouble was, and it was freely stated in a way that is now known to have been wrong. Indeed, the author was the first to discover the real reason for the involuntary second pull and double discharge. As this phenomenon did not occur in pistols, but did so in shoulder weapons, it apparently seemed easy to trace the cause. Very early in the nineteenth century, dozens, and since then hundreds, of designers and patentees have set out with the announcement that they had discovered the true cause of the trouble, and met it with a patent. As the latter were always badly constructed, it may be assumed that the patentees were wrong in their diagnosis. As a matter of fact, they were, as was proved when the author published the true cause of involuntary pull in _The County Gentleman_, and for a time had to meet alone the hostile criticism of most of the gun trade, the members of which now admit the truth of those criticised statements. Although the true reason must be dealt with under the heading of single-trigger guns and rifles, it may be briefly stated that the success of the single-trigger double-barrelled pistol was not because of its more feeble explosion, as was supposed, but because the recoil continues long enough to allow the will of the shooter to gain command of his muscular finger action, before the check to recoil occurs. Whereas, with the shoulder gun, the finger which has let off the first lock flies back as the trigger is carried from it by recoil, and this sustained muscular action cannot be stopped by the will as quickly as the gun recoil is lessened by the shoulder. Consequently, we involuntarily give a second pressure to the trigger, without knowing that we have ceased giving a first. This want of perception of what we ourselves do is caused partly by quickness of the recoil, and partly because the recoil relieves the pressure, and our wills have nothing to do with the matter. Or, to be more correct, we pull off the trigger once intentionally, but are unable to cease pulling when the trigger has given way. Consequently we unconsciously follow up the trigger as it jumps back in recoil, catch up with it, and involuntarily pull it again without knowing that we have let go, or had the trigger momentarily snatched from us.

It is clear that the understanding of this principle was as necessary to designers of automatic repeaters as it was to makers of double-barrelled shot guns, and yet the Mauser repeating automatic pistol and the Webley Fosbery automatic revolver were invented, with some others, before the reason of the involuntary pull had been discovered; and more than that, the author had tested the Mauser with its shoulder stock satisfactorily. But no satisfactory automatic rifle had been then invented, and the trouble with them was to prevent the sending forth of a stream of bullets when only one shot was wanted. The greater force being dealt with, had brought into action the difficulty of the involuntary pull. This has now been overcome; but still there are other difficulties which have been treated less satisfactorily, and those who are ambitious to use automatic weapons will be wise to confine that ambition to the many pistols and the revolver in the market. Repeating shot guns are lumbering tools, from which disqualification the automatic weapons are little likely to be free. Still, it is quite possible that a gunner could shoot more birds out of a single covey with one automatic gun than with two double guns. But what of it? The aim of the gunner is not merely to shoot at one covey, but to keep on shooting fast for perhaps half an hour. The thing that stops very fast shooting is not loading and changing guns, but heat of barrels, and consequently to make these single barrels equal to the doubles there must be four of them in place of two doubles, and six of them in place of three ejectors. The time has not yet come when anybody wants to employ three loaders to carry six guns.

There is some reason to prefer the automatic principle for pistols and revolvers, because the user’s life may often depend upon the quickness of his shots at an enemy, but there is less reason for their use in military rifles, and actual disadvantage for sporting rifles and shot guns. The author has shot the Mauser, the Colt, and the Fosbery with satisfaction to himself. The latest invention is a sliding automatic pistol of .32 gauge invented by Messrs. Webley. But no automatic pistol can be as reliable as the service revolver, or as the Fosbery, since a sticking cartridge or a misfire disables any of them.

It is often said that these spring actuated actions, on which the barrel slides back, give less recoil than others, but in practice this is not so, and in science it could not be so, although it is stated in the last Government text-book that they reduce recoil.

The principles on which it is sought to make automatic rifles are as follows:—

1. To actuate an ejector, magazine loading, and closing action by means of gas obtained from a hole in the barrel.

2. To actuate the same movements by means of recoil and rebound of the sliding barrel on to an independent stock grooved to carry the barrel, and fitted with a spring.

3. To actuate the same movements by means of allowing the whole weapon to recoil on to a false heel plate spring, and rebound from it.

4. By allowing a short sliding recoil of the barrel to make the bolting action slide farther back on to the stock and a spring, and to rebound from them.

Several of these principles have been employed in conjunction in this or other countries. The recoil is made to compress a spring, which by re-expansion completes the work of closing up the rifle, when it does not stick and fail, as in all specimens of automatic rifles has occurred at intervals.

All nations are now armed with magazine repeating rifles, but none have yet adopted automatic loading for rifles. The choice between the various magazine mechanisms is a mere matter of taste, but the shortening of the British national arm to 25 inches seems to have been done without regard to the fact that no rifle of 25 inches can compete in accuracy with an equally well-made and an equally well-loaded weapon of 30 inches, although it may compete favourably with the discarded Mark II. Lee-Enfield, which was improperly made and also badly loaded. Unfortunately, our prospective enemies are not embracing the faults of the Mark II., but are adhering to a rifle instead of a carbine. That is the correct term to employ to describe the new weapon.

The carbine of any period has generally been equal to the rifle of the preceding decade, but it has never yet been equal to the rifle of its own decade, and never will be.

Miniature rifles for amateur soldiers in the making are very numerous. The best cheap one the author has handled is the rifle with which Mr. W. W. Greener won the _Navy and Army_ competition, which was managed by the author. What is here meant by a low price is £2, 2s., and under. The rifle was used with peep sights. But better advice than naming any maker is this. All the makers profess to put a group of seven shots on to a postage stamp at 50 yards. They all employ expert shooters who can do this if it is to be done. Buy the rifle with which they do it in your presence, and it will then be your own fault if you cannot perform likewise. This test of a single rifle is quite satisfactory; but a double rifle has to be dealt with differently, as is explained in another chapter. Of course, it is a mistake to shoot a rifle from any sort of fixed rest; the weapon, when loose in the hands, bends its barrel, or flips, jumps, and also recoils, and it is good or bad according as it does accurate work under the action of all these influences. A rest to steady the arms is quite permissible, but a vice to hold the rifle is not.

Once Mr. Purdey expressed the opinion that he could learn as much from his customers as they could from him. The author thought this so shrewd a remark, that, having a knowledge of the many good sportsmen and big-game hunters who employ the weapons of the Messrs. Holland & Holland, Messrs. John Rigby, and Messrs. Westley Richards, he wrote to each of them to ask their opinions of the best bore and weight of rifle, sort and weight of powder, sort and weight of bullet, and velocity of bullet to be expected, for each of the following animals, as if each were the only object to be pursued by the sportsman. He stated at the same time, that compromise to meet the requirements of several, or many, of these animals he regarded as a personal and individual matter to the sportsman. He pointed out also that in asking for opinions he knew that he was asking for a consensus of opinion of the past customers of the firms in question. It is interesting to compare the views of each maker as to the best rifle to use for everything, from a rook and rabbit, to an African elephant charging down on the gunner, and requiring the frontal shot. What is intended is the very best weapon to have in hand at the moment, if there were nothing else to be considered. Mr. Holland’s reply is as follows:—

“98 NEW BOND STREET, LONDON, W.,
“_October 11th, 1906_

“DEAR MR. TEASDALE-BUCKELL,—It is impossible in the space of a short paragraph to go thoroughly into the question of the best bore, weight of rifle, etc. etc., best suited to each kind of game. A good deal must depend upon the conditions under which the rifle is used, the capabilities of the sportsman, etc., but taken generally the rifles mentioned below are those we have found to give the best all-round results, and our opinion is formed upon the reports received from a large number of sportsmen, including many of the best known and most experienced game hunters.

“_Rooks._—.220 or .250 bore.

“_Rabbits._—.250 bore; weight about 5 to 6 lbs.

“_Red Deer, Scotch._—(1) .375 bore double-barrelled; weight 9½ lbs. (2) .375 bore sporting magazine rifle, Mannlicher-Schonauer for choice; weight 7½ lbs. (3) .375 bore single-drop block; weight 7½ lbs.; velocity about 2000 ft.; charge 40–43 grains of cordite or its equivalent; 270 grains bullet, either soft-nosed solid or hollow point.

“_Chamois._—Same as for Red Deer, also .256 Mannlicher.

“_African Antelopes._—.375 bore as above.

“_Indian Deer._—.375 bore as above.

“_Moose, Wapiti, and big 35–50 stone Deer of Hungary, etc._—.450 bore double-barrelled rifle; weight 10½ lbs.; charge 70 grains of cordite powder or its equivalent; bullet soft-nosed solid 370 or 420 grains; velocity about 2000 ft.

“_Lions._—(1) 12 bore Magnum Paradox; weight 8–8½ lbs.; charge of smokeless powder equivalent to 4½ drams of black powder; 735 grains hollow-point bullet; velocity 1250–1300 ft. (2) .450 cordite rifle same as for Moose, etc.

“_Tigers, from houdah or machan._—12 bore Paradox; weight about 7¼ lbs.; charge equivalent to 3¼ drams of black powder; 735 grains bullet; velocity about 1100 ft.

“_Lions and Tigers, followed up on foot._—12 bore Magnum Paradox.

“_Elephant, Buffalo, etc., in thick jungle._—10 bore Paradox; weight 13 lbs.; nitro powder charge equivalent to 8 drams of black powder, in solid drawn brass case, solid nickel-covered bullet 950 grains.

“_Elephant, Buffalo, in more open country._—.450 cordite rifle same as above; charge 70 grains cordite or its equivalent; nickel-covered solid bullet 480 grains.”

Mr. Rigby replies as follows:—

“_Rooks._—.250 bore, shooting usual Eley or Kynoch cartridge.

“_Rabbits._—.300 bore, shooting usual Eley or Kynoch cartridge.

“_Red Deer, Scotch._—Double-barrel hammerless .303; shooting cordite and split-nose bullets; weight of rifle about 8 lbs.

“_Chamois._—Mauser-Rigby magazine rifle with telescope sight; weight of rifle 7½ lbs.; Mauser 7 mm. cartridges with split bullets.

“_African Antelopes, Indian Deer, Ibex, and Tibet Wild Sheep, Lions and Tigers._—.350 bore Rigby double barrel; weight 9¼ lbs.; cordite cartridge giving 2150 f.s. m.v.; bullet 310 grains, split and soft nose, or Mauser-Rigby magazine shooting same ammunition; a grand rifle.

“_Eastern Elephants, Eastern Buffalo, African Buffalo, African Elephants._—.450 high velocity cordite double barrel; weight 11 lbs.; bullet 480 grains m.v. 2150 f.s.”

Mr. Leslie B. Taylor replies for Messrs. Westley Richards thus:—

“BOURNBROOK, BIRMINGHAM
“_October 13th, 1906_

“DEAR MR. BUCKELL,—I regret that I could not give you the information earlier, being up to my eyes in work. I have filled in the sizes I think suitable for each kind of game gathered from our clients’ own opinions formed from experience. You will notice that in some cases I have mentioned the .450 high velocity rifle. As regards India, this rifle will now be unavailable; a recent alteration of the shooting regulations excludes the .450 bore, which like the .303 cannot be imported into that country for private use.

“The new accelerated express rifle .375/.303 will no doubt, on account of its being associated in the minds of the officials with the actual .303 bore, come under the same ban. But this is a powerful rifle, as you will gather from the enclosed particulars, and when used with the capped bullet becomes a most formidable weapon, and has been satisfactorily employed against Tiger.

“I have just introduced a new extension of the accelerated express system .318 bore, 2500 feet velocity, 250 grains bullet, muzzle energy 3466 ft. lbs., and this ranks only second to the .400 bore rifle. It is remarkably accurate, and as it is used in conjunction with the copper-capped expanding bullet, it will take the place of the .450 bore now prohibited.

“I merely give you these particulars, as you will see that very shortly, if the Indian regulations continue in force, as I have no doubt they will, the other information might be considered out of date.—Yours very truly,

“LESLIE B. TAYLOR

“_Rooks._—.250; some prefer .297/.230, a similar one.

“_Rabbits._—.250 or .300; latter preferred if country will permit.

“_Red Deer, Scotch._—Many sizes are used, from .256 Mannlicher; the .360 high velocity is effective. For those who prefer a very flat trajectory superior to the Mannlicher, the new accelerated h.v. .375/.303 is taken.

“_Chamois._—Nothing less than .360; the .375 with copper-capped bullet is very effective, although the .256 is often used: it is found not to kill the beast.

“_African Antelopes._—.360 and nickel-capped bullet, a .375/.303 accelerated express; many sportsmen are using the .303 with nickel-capped bullet.

“_Indian Deer, Ibex, Tibet Wild Sheep._—.256 Mannlicher, Mauser .275, also .360 and .375 bore with capped bullet; some use ball and shot guns 12 bore.

“_Lions and Tigers._—.360 to .450 h.v. express; the new .375/.303 has proved successful at Tigers with the capped bullet.

“_Eastern Elephants._—The best weapon I know, of which I have the most excellent accounts, is the .577 h.v. rifle, 100 grs. cordite and 750 grs. solid and capped bullet.

“_Eastern Buffalo._—.360, .400, and .450 h.v. express.

“_African Buffalo._—.450 h.v. express and .577 h.v. express.

“_African Elephants._—The .577 .100/.710; some use the .450, but the former is a most deadly weapon.

“I have just received information from an African sportsman that he has shot an African buffalo with a Westley Richards 12 explora, the horn measurements of which are strikingly fine, and promise to be a record.”

In reply to further questions, Mr. Holland writes as follows:—

“_October 13th, 1906_

“DEAR MR. TEASDALE-BUCKELL,—I don’t think it necessary to distinguish between African and Indian elephants. No doubt the former is more difficult to kill with the frontal shot, but you must try and get another shot; then, again, the 480 grain (450) bullet gives enormous penetration, and probably would penetrate the head of an African elephant as well as any bullet you could use. For a charging elephant, there is nothing like the big bore for stopping, or at any rate turning the animal. Velocity: it is a curious thing that we appear to get _practically_ the same elevation with the 375 (450) bullet as the 480 gr. one, and practically the same velocity. We attribute this to the extra weight of the 480 gr. offering more resistance to the powder, and thereby setting up higher pressure, greater heat, though practically making the powder do more work.

HENRY HOLLAND”

It may be said that at this moment velocities are undergoing radical change, due to the improved powder Axite, and that one maker offers rifles giving to the 303 bullet a muzzle velocity of 2700 f.s. This means a greater stride than that from the express to the high velocity rifles, and if it is accurate, then trajectories have been very much reduced.

In reply to a still further question, the following is a reply that explains itself:—