Chapter M: CAMB. UNIV. Mm. 2.21 (Bern. Cat. ii. 9648). Contains Conf. Amantis

only, without ‘Explicit,’ &c. (the last leaf being lost). Parchment, ff. 183, 14 × 9½ in. Quires of eight with catchwords and signatures: double columns of 46 lines: Latin summaries usually in margin, but occasionally in the text, as in A. Several hands, as follows, (1) ff. 1-32, 41-64, 73-88, 97-136, 145-152, 161-176; (2) ff. 33-40, 89-96, 137-144; (3) ff. 65-72; (4) ff. 153-160; (5) ff. 177-183. Finally another, different from all the above, adds sometimes a marginal note which has been dropped, as on ff. 4, 32 v^o, 65, 72 v^o. The first hand, in which more than two-thirds of the book is written, is fairly neat: the third much rougher than the rest, and also more inaccurate.

Floreated half border in fairly good style at the beginning of each book, except the third, fifth, and seventh, and two rather rudely painted miniatures, viz. f. 4 v^o, Nebuchadnezzar’s dream (the king in bed, crowned), and f. 8, the Confession, a curious little picture in the margin. The priest is laying his stole on the head of the penitent, whose features are evidently meant for a portrait. It is quite different however from that which we have in A. Below this picture we find the note, ‘Hic fiat Garn_imentum_.’

The last leaf is lost, containing no doubt the ‘Explicit,’ ‘Quam cinxere,’ and ‘Quia vnusquisque,’ as in A.

The names Stanhope and Yelverton are written on f. 39 (sixteenth cent.), and ‘Margareta Straunge’ on the first leaf (seventeenth cent.). Later the book belonged to Bishop Moore of Norwich (No. 462 in his library), and it passed with the rest of his books to the University of Cambridge in 1715, as a gift from the king.

M is very closely connected with A, as is shown by very many
instances of special agreement, and some considerations suggest
that it may be actually derived from it, as for example the
writing of the Latin verses in the margin after f. 80, which
in A seems to be connected with a change of hand, whereas in
M it begins at the same point without any such reason. On
the other hand M has a good many readings which are clearly
independent, either correcting mistakes and omissions in A, as
Prol. 195 _marg._, 937, i. 673 _marg._, 924, 1336, 3445, ii.
951, iii. 2529, vi. 620, or giving an early reading where A has
a later, e.g. Prol. 869, i. 1118, 1755, ii. 961, 3516, iii.
1939, v. 3914, 5524, &c. In correctness of text and of spelling
M is much inferior to A, especially as regards final _e_: for
example, on f. 53 v^o,

Came neu_er_ ȝit to mannes ere Cam A
Tiding | ne to mannes siȝt Tidinge ... sihte A
Merueil whiche so sore aflihte Merueile which A
Aman_n_es herte as it þe dede þo A
To hym whoche in þe same stede him which A

P₁, formerly PHILLIPPS 2298, bought in June, 1899, by Mr. B. Quaritch, who kindly allowed me to see it. Parchment, leaf measuring about 9 × 6½ in., double column of 39 lines, in a fairly neat running hand, with many contractions because of the small size of the leaf. Latin summaries omitted. No decoration. Text agrees with AJM group, so far as I have examined it.

Ch. CHETHAM’S LIBR., MANCHESTER, A. 6. 11 (Bern. Cat. ii. 7151). Contains _Conf. Amantis_ with ‘Explicit’ (4 lines) and ‘Quam cinxere.’ Parchment, ff. 126, about 15¼ × 10¾ in., quires usually of 12 or 14 leaves. Rather irregularly written in double column of 47-61 lines, late fifteenth century. No ornament. Marginal Latin almost entirely omitted, but some English notes by way of summary occasionally in margin, perhaps by later hand.

The first leaf is lost, the MS. beginning Prol. 193, and also two leaves in the second quire (i. 1092-1491) and one in the tenth (viii. 2111-2343); but besides these imperfections there are many omissions, apparently because the copyist got tired of his work, e.g. ii. 3155-3184, iii. 41-126, 817-842, 877-930, 1119-1196, iv. 17-72, 261-370, 569-704, 710-722, 915-968, 1117-1236, v. 72-112. There is also a good deal of omission and confusion in v. 6101-7082. At the end in a scroll is written ‘Notehurste,’ which indicates probably that the book was copied for one of the Chethams of Nuthurst, perhaps Thomas Chetham, who died 1504. The word ‘Notehurst’ also occurs at the end of the Glasgow MS. of the ‘Destruction of Troy,’ which has in another place the names of John and Thomas Chetham of ‘Notehurst’ as the owners of it.

In text it belongs to the AJM group, and sometimes, as iv. 208,
stands alone with J. There are many corruptions, however, and
the spelling is late and bad.

N₂. NEW COLLEGE, OXFORD, 326. Contains _Conf. Amantis_ only (no ‘Explicit’). Parchment, ff. 207 + 4 blanks, about 13¾ × 9½ in., in quires of 8 with catchwords; neatly written in double column of 40 lines (or 39). No Latin summaries or verses. The handwriting changes after f. 62 (at iii. 2164) and becomes rather larger and more ornamental.

Two leaves lost after f. 35, containing ii. 1066-1377, and some of the leaves of the MS. from which it was copied had been displaced, so that iv. 2501-2684 comes after 2864, then follows 3049-3232, then 2865-3048, and after these 3233 ff. (two leaves displaced in the original). Lines omitted sometimes with blanks left, as i. 1044, 2527.

From the coats of arms which it contains the book would seem to have been written for Thomas Mompesson of Bathampton, sheriff of Wilts in 1478 (K. Meyer, _John Gower’s Beziehungen_, &c.). It was given to John Mompesson by Sir Giles Mompesson in 1650, and to New College by Thomas Mompesson, Fellow, in 1705.

The text is a combination of two types. It has the Lancaster
dedication at the beginning, but the conclusion which belongs
to the first recension. On examination it proves that the
scribe who wrote the first eight quires followed a manuscript
not of the F, but of the SΔ class (agreeing for example with
S in i. 1881 f., 2017 ff., ii. 2387, iii. 168, 1241, and
differing from F in regard to i. 2267 ff., 2343 ff., &c.),
while the copyist of the remainder followed one of the revised
first recension. The spelling is poor.

E₂. BIBL. EGERTON 913, Brit. Museum. A fragment, containing _Conf. Amantis_ from the beginning to i. 1701. Paper, ff. 47, 11½ × 8 in., in quires of 16 with catchwords: single column, 30-37 lines on page: Latin summaries in margin. Three hands, (1) f. 1-26, 31-36; (2) 27-30; (3) 37-47.

On f. 26 v^o. there is an omission of i. 387-570 (one leaf of 184 lines lost in the copy). This is supplied by the insertion of four leaves after f. 26, containing i. 375-580.

The text belongs to the revised group, as shown by Prol. 6, 7,
115, 659, 869, i. 162, 278, 368, 1262, &c.

(_b_) _Intermediate._

H₁. HARLEIAN 3490, Brit. Museum. Contains, ff. 1-6 St Edmund’s _Speculum Religiosorum_, ff. 8-215 _Confessio Amantis_, left unfinished on f. 215 v^o. Parchment, 215 leaves, 14½ × 10 in., in quires of 8 with catchwords: double column of 34-51 lines, small neat hand of middle fifteenth cent., with some corrections, perhaps in the same hand. Latin summaries in the text, underlined with red. Blank leaf cut out after f. 6, and f. 7 left blank, so that Gower begins on the first leaf of the second quire. The text is left unfinished at viii. 3062*, part of the last page remaining blank.

Floreated pages at the beginning of the books and also at f. 11, with various coats of arms painted.

The text given by this MS. is of an intermediate type.
Occasionally throughout it is found in agreement with AJM &c.
rather than with ERC &c., as Prol. 6, 7, i. 162, 630, 1755,
1768 ff., 1934, &c., and in a large portion of the fifth book
it passes over definitely in company with XG &c. to the revised
class, but it does not contain the distinctive readings of XG.
Sometimes it stands alone of the first recension in company
with F &c., as iv. 2414, vii. 1749, viii. 2098, and especially
in regard to the three passages, i. 2267 ff., 2343 ff., 2369
ff. In individual correctness of text and spelling the MS. does
not rank high, and it is especially bad as regards insertion
and omission of final _e_, as ‘Wherof him ouht welle to drede,’
‘Ayenste the poyntes of the beleue,’ ‘Of whome that he taketh
eny hede.’ It has _th_ regularly for þ and _y_ for ȝ.

Y. In the possession of the MARQUESS OF BUTE, by whose kindness I have been allowed to examine it. Contains _Confessio Amantis_, imperfect at beginning and end. Parchment, 15½ × 10¾ in., in quires of 8 with catchwords on scrolls. Very well written in double column of 50 lines, early fifteenth cent. Latin summaries in text (red). Floreated page finely illuminated at the beginning of each book, with good painting of large initials, some with figures of animals, in a style that looks earlier than the fifteenth cent. Spaces left on f. 2, apparently for two miniatures, before and after the Latin lines following i. 202.

Begins in the last Latin summary of the Prologue, ‘Arion nuper citharista,’ followed by Prol. 1053, ‘Bot wolde god,’ &c., having lost six leaves. Again, after iv. 819 nine leaves are lost, up to iv. 2490, and one leaf also which contained vi. 2367-vii. 88: the book ends with viii. 2799, two or three leaves being lost here. The book belonged to the first Marquess of Bute, who had his library at Luton. At present it is at St. John’s Lodge, Regent’s Park.

This is a good manuscript, carefully written and finely
decorated. There are very few contractions, and in particular
the termination _-oun_ is generally written in full, as
‘confessioun,’ i. 202, ‘resoun,’ iii. 1111, ‘devocioun,’
‘contemplacioun,’ v. 7125 f. &c., and _th_ is written regularly
for þ. As regards individual accuracy and spelling it is very
fair, but the scribe adds _-e_ very freely at the end of words.
The type of text represented is evidently intermediate to some
extent, but I have not been able to examine it sufficiently to
determine its exact character. It supports the revised group
in a certain number of passages, e.g. i. 264, 630, 3374, 3396,
3416, ii. 31, 1328, 1758, &c., sometimes in company with H₁
and sometimes not. In particular we may note the passage i.
3374 ff., where in some lines it is revised as above mentioned,
and in others, as 3381, 3414, 3443, it keeps the earlier text.
Occasionally Y seems to have a tendency to group itself with B,
as i. 208, 604, and in other places we find YE or YEC forming a
group in agreement with B, as i. 161, iii. 633, v. 1946, 3879.