Chapter XXVIII: Part 28

DIAGNOSIS.--It is evidently very desirable to recognize the existence of phthisis at as early a period as possible with reference to the adoption of {411} measures with a view to prevent the further development and progress of the disease. It is also very desirable, if practicable, to determine that phthisis does not exist; that is, by the absence of diagnostic points to exclude it. Difficulty of diagnosis relates almost exclusively to an early period when the phthisical affection is small. The diagnostic points pertaining to the symptoms and the physical signs in the incipiency of the disease therefore especially claim attention.

A cough of more or less duration, which was at first slight and dry, gradually increasing and accompanied by the expectoration of mucus, should always excite a suspicion of phthisis, especially if the patient's age be between twenty and thirty years. This is not the history of a chronic primary bronchitis. A cough as just described should never be considered as nervous or sympathetic without due investigation. It should not be attributed to pharyngitis, although the latter affection is found to exist. Want of breath on exercise is a symptom pointing to something more than a bronchial or pharyngeal affection. The import of these symptoms is still greater if, after the commencement of the cough or from an earlier date, there has been decrease in weight and strength. Their significance is much increased by the occurrence of hæmoptysis. Hæmoptysis followed by a persistent cough, and still more if cough preceded its occurrence, is always presumptive evidence of a phthisical affection. Occurring without having been preceded by cough, and when cough does not immediately follow, it should suggest the probability of phthisis. In the larger proportion of cases under these circumstances it is a forerunner of the diagnostic symptoms and signs of the disease. In connection with the cough a persistent increase of the temperature of the body is an important diagnostic symptom. Chilly sensations and flashes of heat are symptoms of some importance. Especially significant are pleuritic stitch-pains referable to the upper part of the chest or beneath the scapula, these being symptomatic of the circumscribed dry pleurisies which may occur at an early period of the disease. Impaired appetite, pallor of the face, and a tendency to perspire during sleep have much significance taken in connection with the pulmonary and other symptoms.

A positive diagnosis must rest on physical signs, together with more or less of the foregoing symptoms. The physical conditions which furnish the diagnostic signs are solidification of a small portion or of small portions of lung, usually at or near the apex, the presence of mucus in the small-sized bronchial tubes, and perhaps fibrinous exudation on the pleural surface within a circumscribed area corresponding to the solidified portion or portions of lung. The signs furnished by these conditions are slight dulness on percussion, a broncho-vesicular (formerly called rude or harsh) respiration, some increase of vocal resonance and of the whispered voice, subcrepitant râles, and perhaps a grazing friction murmur. It may be important to consider the physical signs of phthisis with some detail. Aside from their importance, a reason for this is that terms by which some signs are designated are not used in precisely the same sense by all medical writers.

A small phthisical affection gives rise to slight or moderate dulness on percussion. In order to appreciate this sign if the dulness be slight, attention should be paid to the pitch of the resonance as well as to the lessened intensity of resonance. The pitch is always raised. By attention to the latter character, in conjunction with the diminution of intensity, a degree of dulness may be sometimes appreciated which, without attention to the pitch, might not be determinable.[13] In determining abnormal dulness in the infra-clavicular region on one side, the normal disparity between the two sides of the chest {412} in this region must be taken into account. The resonance at the right summit, as compared with that of the left summit, is, normally, somewhat dull. Hence it is not as easy to make out an abnormal dulness at the right as at the left summit. If the relative abnormal dulness at the right summit be but slight, the question is whether there be more than a normal disparity. This question is rendered difficult by the fact that the degree of normal disparity varies somewhat in different healthy persons. In cases of doubt little reliance is to be placed on this sign alone, but it is to be taken in connection with auscultatory signs.

[Footnote 13: The author was the first to indicate the fact that dulness is always associated with elevation of pitch. Vide "Prize Essay on Variations of Pitch in the Sounds obtained by Percussion and Auscultation," _Transactions of the American Medical Association_, 1852.]

With reference to the auscultatory signs in cases of phthisis, it is to be premised that often, owing to the importance of studying the sounds derived from a limited area and of localizing morbid conditions, the use of the stethoscope is indispensable. It is impossible to meet all the requirements of physical diagnosis by immediate auscultation. After an experience of more than a quarter of a century the writer would advise the binaural stethoscope in preference to any other. For the benefit of those who are not practically familiar with this instrument, it should be added that in order to appreciate its advantages, the instrument, in the first place, must be properly constructed, and, in the second place, some practice is necessary. A sound produced within the instrument is at first an obstacle, but it is speedily overcome by use.[14]

[Footnote 14: The dissatisfaction with the binaural stethoscope so often comes from defects in its construction that it seems proper to refer to Tiemann & Co., and to Ford & Co., of New York as reliable makers of this instrument.]

A small tuberculous solidification is represented by a broncho-vesicular respiration. This sign was named and described by me in 1856. The name takes the place of the terms rudeness, harshness, and hardness--terms which are not only inadequate, but convey an erroneous idea. Quoting from another work, the characters of the broncho-vesicular respiration and its comprehensive signification are as follows: "The sign represents the different degrees of solidification of lung between an amount so slight as to occasion only the smallest appreciable modification of the respiratory sounds, and an amount so great as to approximate closely to the degree giving rise to bronchial or tubular respiration. In other words, all the gradations of respiratory modifications caused by incomplete or an inconsiderable solidification are embraced under the name broncho-vesicular. The gradations correspond to the amount of solidification; that is, they show the solidification to be either very slight, moderate, or nearly sufficient to be regarded as considerable or complete. The sign is therefore important as evidence, first, of the existence of solidification, and, second, of the degree of solidification. Analyzing this sign, the most distinctive feature is the combination of the vesicular and the tubular quality in the inspiratory sound. These two qualities may be combined in variable proportions. The pitch of the sound is raised in proportion as the tubular predominates over the vesicular quality. The expiratory sound is more or less prolonged, tubular in quality, and the pitch raised. The prolongation of this sound, its tubular quality, and the raised pitch are proportionate to the predominance of the tubular over the vesicular quality in the inspiratory sound. If the solidification be slight, the characters of the normal vesicular respiration predominate; that is, the inspiratory sound has but a small proportion of the tubular quality, and is but little raised in pitch, the expiratory sound being not much prolonged, its tubularity not marked, the pitch not high. If, on the other hand, the solidification be almost enough to give a bronchial respiration, the inspiratory sound has only a little vesicular quality, the tubular quality predominating, the pitch proportionately raised, and the expiratory sound is prolonged, high, and tubular, nearly to the same extent as in bronchial respiration. The less the solidification the more the characters {413} of the normal vesicular respiration predominate over those of the bronchial respiration; and, per contra, the greater the solidification the more the characters of the bronchial predominate over those of the normal vesicular respiration."[15] By means of the broncho-vesicular respiration a slight morbid solidification may be recognized in one of the infra-clavicular regions or over the scapula. Here, however, as with regard to percussion, an allowance is to made on the right side for a normal disparity. The respiratory sounds on the right side at the summit, as compared with those at the left, have normally the characters more or less marked of a broncho-vesicular respiration. These characters are more marked as the stethoscope is brought toward the sternum. Hence a small solidification of lung is more easily ascertained by auscultation at the left than at the right summit.

[Footnote 15: Vide _Manual of Auscultation and Percussion_, by the author; also, paper contained in the _Transactions of the International Medical Congress_, London, 1882. The broncho-vesicular respiration was called by Skoda indeterminate (unbestimmt), and this term is still used by German writers. These sounds are not indeterminate if the characters derived from pitch and quality be analytically studied; they are sounds intermediate between the normal respiratory murmur and bronchial respiration.]

Not infrequently in cases of incipient phthisis the respiratory sounds at the summit on the affected side are so weakened that their characters cannot be studied. Weakness of the respiratory murmur in these cases becomes a diagnostic sign taken in connection with other signs.

A small tuberculous deposit may increase the vocal resonance. But, again, a normal disparity between the two sides must be allowed for. The normal vocal resonance is always greater on the right side. If, therefore, it be a question as to the existence of a small tuberculous affection at the right summit, it is to be decided whether the disparity be greater than normal. A small tuberculous deposit at the apex of the left lung, on the other hand, may not increase the resonance to an equality with that at the right summit.

Attention should be paid to the whispered voice, and, still again, the two sides show a normal disparity. The sound heard with the whispered voice, which may be distinguished as the normal bronchial whisper, is louder on the right than on the left side, and somewhat higher in pitch on the left side, at the summit of the chest. If at the right summit it exceed the normal disparity, and the pitch be higher than at the left summit, the sign may be distinguished as increased bronchial whisper, and it denotes solidification. If, on the other hand, the sound at the left summit be louder than that of the right summit, there is increased bronchial whisper, representing the solidification at the apex of the left lung.[16]

[Footnote 16: The different abnormal modifications of sounds produced by the whispered voice were first named and described by the author. Vide _Manual of Auscultation and Percussion_.]

The normal points of disparity at the summit of the chest render the diagnosis of incipient phthisis by means of alterations in the resonance on percussion, the respiratory sounds, the vocal resonance, and the whispered voice a problem in some cases of not a little difficulty. In these cases an examination of the sputa for the presence of the tuberculous parasite may furnish proof of the existence of the disease. This proof may in some instances be obtained when the physical signs, together with the symptoms, do not render the diagnosis positive, and it may be sought for in order to corroborate the evidence derived from other sources. The author can testify from considerable experience to the value of an examination of sputa for bacilli in cases in which the diagnosis is not rendered positive by other signs and by symptoms. It must, however, be borne in mind that the absence of bacilli in the sputa is not sufficient to exclude phthisis, especially if but a single examination be made. In doubtful cases, if an examination of the sputa be negative, the examination should be repeated. The weight of evidence against the {414} existence of phthisis is, of course, greater in proportion to the number of examinations with negative results.[17]

[Footnote 17: The following method of staining the bacilli tuberculosis in the sputum is essentially that recommended by Ehrlich in the _Deutsche medicinische Wochenschrift_, Mai 6, 1882:

It is important that the sputum to be examined should be derived from the lungs, and should not be solely that from the upper air-passages. A small opaque particle from the sputum is to be pressed between two cover-glasses, so that when these are drawn apart a thin film will remain upon each. Each cover-glass, as soon as the film is dry, is to be passed, with the preparation upward, rather rapidly three times through the flame of a Bunsen's burner or of an alcohol lamp. The preparation is now ready for staining.

A small quantity of water in a test-tube or flask is now shaken with an excess of aniline oil (which need be only in small amount), and after a few moments is filtered through moistened filter-paper. To the clear filtrate thus obtained is to be added, drop by drop, a saturated alcoholic solution of fuchsin (gentian-violet, methyl-violet, and several other aniline colors may be substituted) until the fluid begins to be opalescent, showing that it is saturated with the coloring agent. In this manner an alkaline-aniline staining solution is prepared.

Into this staining solution the cover-glasses, having the dried films of sputum prepared as above described, are dropped, preferably so that they will float with the preparation downward. Here they remain from a half hour to twenty-four hours. If taken out in a short time, the fluid, at least for a time during the staining process, should be heated moderately over a water-bath, and in any case the process of staining is accelerated and rendered more certain by heating.

After removal from the staining fluid the cover-glass is washed for a few moments in water, and is then dipped into a mixture of one part of pure nitric acid (it should contain no nitrous acid) to about three or four parts of water. Here it remains only a few moments, when it will be found that the preparation has lost its color, although a part will be restored by the subsequent washing in water, which should be done at once. If the preparation has not been sufficiently decolorized, it may be placed again in nitric acid, but it is not necessary or desirable that it should remain there many minutes. The object of the nitric acid is to extract the color from all but the tubercle bacilli.

The preparation may now be at once examined either in glycerin or (after drying or after treatment with alcohol and oil of cloves) in balsam. Ehrlich recommends, previous to this, a staining of the background with some color other than that of the bacilli; thus, with methyline blue if the organisms are stained red with fuchsin. This staining of the background, however, is not necessary. While the ideal method of studying the stained bacilli is by means of Leis's oil-immersion lenses and Abbé's illuminating apparatus, they can usually be seen readily enough with the high powers in ordinary use, such as the one-fifth or one-sixth inch objectives of our American microscope. After staining with fuchsin the bacilli appear as short rods of a red color, frequently curved or bent.]

The adventitious sounds which have been mentioned--namely, the subcrepitant râle and the pleural friction murmur--sometimes afford valuable aid in the diagnosis. Taken in connection with the direct signs obtained by auscultation and percussion, these accessory signs when present make the diagnosis positive: they are by no means uniformly present, and therefore their absence is not proof against the existence of a phthisical affection. To these accessory signs another sign may be added--namely, an abnormal transmission of the heart-sounds within one of the infra-clavicular regions. In the middle of this region there is nearly an equal transmission of these sounds normally. Comparing the two sides as regards the two sounds respectively, the first sound is a little louder on the left, and the second sound a little louder on the right side. Now, with a little solidification the sounds may be better transmitted, so that they are abnormally loud on the affected side.

A decision that there is no physical proof of phthisis must rest on the absence of all the foregoing signs after repeated examinations of the chest.

It is not to be concluded that for a positive diagnosis of incipient phthisis all or most of the foregoing diagnostic signs must be recognized. They are not all present in all cases. Two or three of these signs, and even a single one if well marked and associated with diagnostic points pertaining to the symptoms and history, may suffice for a positive diagnosis.

It is an interesting question how small a portion of solidification may furnish signs sufficient for a diagnosis. I have the records of two cases bearing {415} on this question. A patient came under my observation at Bellevue Hospital in 1867. In the right infra-clavicular region the respiration was abnormally broncho-vesicular, the vocal resonance was increased, and there was increase of the bronchial whisper within a small circumscribed space. On these signs was based the diagnosis of a small tuberculous deposit. The case served to illustrate the signs just named to classes for practical instruction in auscultation and percussion. The patient, who was employed as a helper in the apothecary's shop, died suddenly from taking by mistake an overdose of the fluid extract of aconite. The autopsy showed at the apex of the right lung a nodule of the size of a filbert, no tuberculous deposit being elsewhere found.

A recent medical graduate, twenty-two years of age, had cough and two attacks of hæmoptysis. His father and a sister had died with phthisis. There was slight dulness on percussion on the summit of the chest on the left side, with crepitation at both summits. These were the only signs noted. This case was included among the cases of recovery reported in my work on phthisis published in 1875. He enjoyed excellent health and was notably vigorous for twenty-eight years. Death took place in 1880 from disease of the heart and kidneys. The autopsy showed at the apex of each lung a small indurated portion somewhat larger on the left than on the right side. Elsewhere there was no appearance denoting present or past pulmonary disease.

It is in only a small proportion of cases that, when patients first come under medical observation, the phthisical affection is so small as to render the diagnosis difficult. The tuberculous solidification is generally sufficient to give rise to well-marked signs. The shrinkage of the lung at the apex from interstitial growth and diminished capability of expansion may have caused a small infra-clavicular depression and restricted respiratory movements in this region. The dulness on percussion is readily recognized. The characters of the broncho-vesicular respiration are easily determined. The increase of vocal resonance and increased bronchial whisper admit of no doubt. With these signs, oftener than at an earlier period, are associated accessory signs--namely, subcrepitant râles and bubbling in larger tubes, pleuritic friction murmur, and undue transmission of the heart-sounds.

At a somewhat later period, and sometimes even when cases are first observed, the physical signs denote a still greater degree of solidification. Infra-clavicular depression and restricted movements on one side are marked. The respiration is bronchial and the voice bronchophonic. There may be pectoriloquy with the bronchophonic characters, showing that the speech is transmitted through solidified lung.[18]

[Footnote 18: Bronchophony is to be understood as a sign distinct from increased vocal resonance. In bronchophony the resonance may or may not be increased. Intensity is not a character of this sign. Its distinctive characters are concentration of the voice sound, nearness to the ear, and elevation of pitch. The terms concentration and nearness to the ear properly express what was intended by Laennec in the words "la transmission évidente de la voix à travers le stethoscope." Pectoriloquy is to be distinguished from bronchophony. These two terms are sometimes confounded. Bronchophony is transmission of the voice, pectoriloquy the transmission of speech--that is, articulate words.]

Exceptional cases are to be referred to in which over lung containing solidified portions from tuberculous deposit dulness on percussion is wanting. Not only is dulness wanting, but the resonance is greater than normal. The resonance is altered in character. With an increase of intensity the quality is in part tympanitic and the pitch is raised. This is the sign described by me many years ago under the name vesiculo-tympanitic resonance. The distinctive characters are those just mentioned--namely, increase of intensity, the quality a combination of the vesicular and the tympanitic, and more or less elevation of pitch. The name vesiculo-tympanitic expresses these characters. It is the sign of pulmonary emphysema. It denotes that portions of {416} lung situated between islands of solidification have become emphysematous. The emphysema is vicarious; that is, supplementary to the shrinkage of the portions solidified, and, added thereto, probably collapsed lobules. Were one to be governed by percussion alone in the physical diagnosis, this sign would in some cases mislead. The liability to error is avoided by taking due cognizance of the associated signs furnished by auscultation.

In cases of advanced phthisis cavities are added to tuberculous solidification. It is desirable to recognize the existence of these. In most instances the signs which may be distinguished as cavernous suffice for the recognition of cavities. The cavernous signs are furnished by percussion and by auscultation of the respiration and of the voice.

A purely tympanitic resonance within a circumscribed space points to a cavity, but a tympanitic resonance with either an amphoric or a cracked-metal intonation is more especially a cavernous sign. An amphoric or a cracked-metal resonance over a cavity may often be obtained by observing certain rules in percussion--namely, percussing with a single and rather forcible blow, the mouth of the patient being open and brought close to the ear. These signs may be rendered still more distinct by means of the binaural stethoscope, the pectoral extremity being close to the patient's opened mouth, an assistant making the percussion. These cavernous signs are not present when cavities contain much liquid or when communication with the bronchial tubes is temporarily obstructed; hence the signs are sometimes present and sometimes absent.

There is a distinctive cavernous respiratory sign. This assertion is called for by the fact that the existence of the sign is not as yet recognized by all medical writers. According to Laennec, the respiratory sounds derived from cavities resemble the bronchial respiration. From his description it would be impossible to distinguish the former from the latter. Skoda considered the cavernous and the bronchial respiration as absolutely identical; and this view is held by German writers at the present time. Walshe indicated an essential differential point pertaining to the inspiratory sound in cavernous respiration--namely, its low pitch. The fact that in purely cavernous respiration the pitch of the expiratory is lower than that of the inspiratory sound was stated by me in 1852.[19] The distinctive characters of the cavernous respiratory sign as then indicated were as follows: An inspiratory sound low in pitch and non-tubular in quality, followed by an expiratory sound still lower in pitch and non-tubular. The quality of the sound in inspiration and in expiration may be said to be blowing, after the term soufflante used by Laennec, but applied by him to a sound either bronchial or from a cavity, when the air seems to be drawn from the ear of the auscultator.

[Footnote 19: Vide "Prize Essay."]

Appreciating clearly the characters which are distinctive of cavernous respiration, it is impossible to confound this sign with bronchial respiration, both the inspiratory and the expiratory sound in the latter sign being high in pitch and tubular in quality. This cavernous sign approaches much nearer to the normal vesicular respiration. The only distinction between these two signs is the presence of the vesicular quality in the latter and its absence in the former. Hence, the only liability to error is in confounding the two. This error can only be committed when the respiratory murmur is so feeble that the vesicular quality is not readily appreciable. In order to avoid the error, the respiration should not be pronounced cavernous when the sounds are quite weak, except there be present other correlative cavernous signs.

Cavities are often situated in close proximity to lung solidified by tuberculous deposit or interstitial pneumonia: cavernous respiration and bronchial respiration are then in juxtaposition, and their differential characters are {417} rendered very distinct by contrast. Under these circumstances, however, the cavernous respiration is sometimes modified by combination with the characters of the bronchial respiration. Not infrequently a cavernous inspiration is joined to a bronchial expiration, the more intense expiratory sound representing adjacent solidification extending over the site of the cavity and drowning the weaker cavernous expiration. In another mode of combination the inspiratory sound is bronchial at the beginning and cavernous at the end. Here the cavernous sound occurs a little later than the bronchial, and the latter is supplanted by the former. This variety of broncho-cavernous respiration has been recently described by Seitz under the name metamorphosing respiratory murmur (metamorphosirendes athmungs geräusch). In like manner, the characters of the cavernous and of the normal vesicular respiration may be combined. This combination may be expressed by the term vesiculo-cavernous respiration.

The effect of a cavity upon vocal resonance is to increase its intensity without giving rise to the characters distinctive of bronchophony--namely, nearness to the ear, concentration, and elevation of pitch. Increased vocal resonance, and not bronchophony, is therefore a cavernous sign. If bronchophony be present over a cavity, it denotes adjacent solidification of lung. With the vocal resonance more or less increased the vocal fremitus appreciable on auscultation is often intensified.

A cavernous whisper has the characters of the expiratory sound in the cavernous respiration; that is, it is low in pitch and blowing or non-tubular in quality, being in contrast, as regards these characters, with a high-pitched tubular sound in whispering bronchophony. The latter sign is often found near a cavity, showing the proximity of solidified lung.

Amphoric respiration, amphoric voice, and amphoric whisper are pathognomonic signs of a cavity, provided pneumothorax be excluded. The same is to be said of metallic tinkling, a very rare cavernous sign. Gurgling within a circumscribed space is a cavernous sign of some value. Pectoriloquy--that is, the transmission of articulated words--is not, per se, a cavernous sign; that is to say, the speech may be transmitted by solidified lung as well as through a cavity. This is true alike of words spoken with the loud and with the whispered voice. It is, however, easy to determine whether pectoriloquy be or be not due to a cavity. If with the loud voice the transmitted speech be unaccompanied by the characters of bronchophony, it denotes a cavity. So, if transmitted whispered words be unaccompanied by the characters of the bronchophonic whisper, they denote a cavity. On the other hand, the transmission is by solidified lung if bronchophony and pectoriloquy be conjoined in either the loud or the whispered voice.

The shrinkage of lung incident to the formation of tuberculous cavities increases the depression apparent on inspection in the infra-clavicular region. The site of a cavity is sometimes indicated by a circumscribed bulging of intercostal spaces, within a localized area, on forced expiration or an act of coughing. A sharply-defined circumscribed depression corresponding to the area of a cavity is visible in some cases. Another effect of shrinkage of lung is to uncover the aorta in the second intercostal space on the right side, or the pulmonary artery in a corresponding situation on the left side. The pulsation of these arteries may then be perceived by the touch, and perhaps, also, by the eye. This effect should not lead to the error of inferring the existence of aneurism. Shrinkage of the upper lobe of the left lung may cause considerable elevation of the heart, also enlarging considerably the space within which is felt the cardiac impulse.

With a practical knowledge of the physical signs of which a concise account has been given, it is practicable to determine, first, the existence of phthisis in its incipiency when the tuberculous affection is small; second, during the {418} progress of the disease to ascertain the degree and the extent of the tuberculous solidification; and, third, to recognize the existence of, and to localize, cavities.

Recapitulating the signs belonging to the foregoing phases of the disease, in incipient phthisis they are slight dulness on percussion, broncho-vesicular respiration approximating to the normal vesicular or a respiratory murmur too weak for its characters to be studied, some increase of vocal resonance, increased bronchial whisper, and, as occasional accompanying signs, subcrepitant râles, pleuritic friction murmur, and abnormal transmission of the heart-sounds, more or less of these signs being limited to the summit of the chest on one side. After further progress of the phthisical affection the signs are, dulness on percussion more or less marked, either a broncho-vesicular respiration approximating to the bronchial or a purely bronchial respiration, either notable increase of vocal resonance or bronchophony, either increase of the bronchial whisper or whispering bronchophony, and moist bronchial or bubbling râles which may be either coarse or fine, or both may be combined. After the affection has advanced to the formation of cavities the cavernous signs are added to those of solidification--namely, circumscribed tympanitic resonance on percussion, cracked-metal and amphoric resonance, cavernous respiration, cavernous whisper, increased vocal resonance and gurgling. Pectoriloquy may be present before and after the formation of cavities; in the former instance the transmission of speech being by solidified lung, and in the latter through a cavity, the two modes of transmission being easily differentiated by means of the characters associated with the pectoriloquy.

An intercurrent pneumonia, not tuberculous, may lead to the error of supposing the tuberculous affection to be much greater than it is. Especially is there liability to this error if the patient have not been under observation prior to the intercurrent pneumonia. The latter may give rise to bronchial respiration and bronchophony, with notable dulness on percussion over a considerable space. If the patient have been under observation, the rapidity with which the solidification denoted by these signs has been developed is a diagnostic point. A notable diminution of the solidification within a few weeks or days is evidence that it was due to an intercurrent pneumonia. The tuberculous deposit is never absorbed with such rapidity. The following case may serve as an illustration of this complication: A man aged thirty had had for some time slight cough and want of breath on active exercise, but he had kept about, actively engaged in business, until within a few days of the date of my visit. He was then up and dressed, his chief complaint being want of breath on any exertion. The physical signs gave evidence of considerable solidification of the upper lobe of the right lung. The question was, whether the solidification was due exclusively to phthisis, or whether with this disease was associated an intercurrent pneumonia. The question was settled definitively by an examination of the chest six weeks afterward. At the time of this examination the solidification had in a great measure disappeared; there was only slight dulness on percussion, with increase of vocal resonance and feeble respiratory murmur. Meanwhile, the symptoms had denoted progressive improvement; the cough was now slight; he no longer suffered from want of breath on exertion, and he had improved as regards appetite, strength, etc. This patient consulted me seven years and four months afterward. In the mean time he had considered himself in fair health, but he had been subject to cough, and for the preceding six months the cough had been persistent. There was now dulness at the summit of the chest on the right side, with feeble broncho-vesicular respiration, increase of vocal resonance, abnormal transmission of the heart-sounds, and subcrepitant râles. He had held his weight and strength, and his appetite and digestion were good.

{419} An occasional event in cases of phthisis is obstruction of a primary bronchus from the pressure of an enlarged bronchial gland. This event may explain a degree of embarrassment of respiration out of proportion to the changes which have taken place in the lungs. The bronchial obstruction is shown by notable feebleness or by suppression of the respiratory murmur on the side of the obstruction, and an increase of the murmur on the other side of the chest. Obstruction of a primary bronchus may prevent the appreciation of morbid respiratory signs on the obstructed side.

During the progress of phthisis the symptoms concur with the physical signs in showing the progressive inroads of the disease upon the pulmonary organs. They show, more than the physical signs, the inroad upon the powers of life. They also afford evidence, in conjunction with the physical signs, of arrest of the disease. More reliance is to be placed on the symptoms than on the signs in judging of the rapidity on the one hand, or on the other hand of the slowness, of the progress of the disease. In these several points of view the consideration of symptoms comes more properly under the head of the prognosis.

The symptoms pertaining to complications of phthisis may be the first to lead patients to consult a physician. Not infrequently advice is sought for harshness or hoarseness of the voice, arising from chronic laryngitis, the cough and other symptoms which preceded this affection not having been regarded as of sufficient consequence to require medical aid. It is to be borne in mind that chronic laryngitis, when not of syphilitic origin, is generally secondary to phthisis. The chest is therefore to be examined carefully with reference to the signs of the latter.

Pleurisy with effusion may be a complication which the physician is called upon to treat. A lung compressed by liquid which fills the affected side of the chest cannot be interrogated by means of physical signs. Under these circumstances subcrepitant râles may denote a phthisical affection on the summit of the chest on the opposite side. The existence of cough and expectoration prior to the pleurisy is strong evidence of an antecedent phthisical affection. The occurrence of hæmoptysis adds greatly to the evidence.

A tuberculous patient who has not been under any treatment may apply to a surgeon to be relieved of the inconvenience of a perineal fistula. Operative interference for this affection should never be resorted to without a careful examination of the chest.

PROGNOSIS.--Whether pulmonary phthisis is ever a curable disease has hitherto been a mooted question. Prior to the time of Laennec instances of apparent cure were open to doubt on the score of diagnosis. Laennec did not admit the probability of a cure before the formation of cavities, but he gave the histories in a number of cases in which the cicatrization of cavities had taken place.[20] If by the term curability be meant a complete restoration of the portions of lung affected by tuberculous disease to the normal condition which existed prior to the disease, the doctrine of Laennec is probably true. A moderate or even a small phthisical affection leads to changes which are permanent. There remains more or less impairment of the integrity of the pulmonary organs. But if by the term be meant that all pulmonary symptoms cease, that the patient has good general health, and that the {420} damage to the lungs is not sufficient to prevent an adequate exercise of their functions, a cure may take place before as well as after the formation of cavities. Accepting the latter sense of the term curability, no one at the present time will deny the statement just made--a fact which is due, at least in a measure, to the different views in regard to the treatment of phthisis now as compared with the time of Laennec.

[Footnote 20: "Les observations contenues dans l'ouvrage de M. Bayle, ainsi que ce que nous avons dit nous-mêmes ci-dessus du dévelloppement des tubercles, prouvent suffisamment que l'idée de la possibilité de guérir la phthisie au prémier degré est une illusion. Les tubercles crus tendent essentiellement à grossir et à se ramollir. Il est peut être au pouvoir de l'art de ralentir leur dévelloppement, d'en suspendre la marche rapide, mais non pas de lui faire un pas rétrograde. Mais s'il est impossible de guérir la phthisie au premier degré, un assez grand nombre de faits mont prouvé que dans quelques cas un malade peut guérir après avoir eu dans les poumons des tubercles qui se sont ramollis et ont formé une cavité ulcéreuse" (_Traité de l'Auscultation médiate_).]

The appearances found after death in cases which may be considered as exemplifying, practically, recovery from phthisis vary according to the extent of the tuberculous affection and the stage to which it had advanced. In a case referred to in connection with the diagnosis (vide p. 407) an examination after death, nearly thirty years having elapsed from the date of recovery, showed within small circumscribed spaces at the apex of both lungs a condensed pulmonary tissue. In the following case there was a similar condition within larger spaces: The patient, a man aged about forty, was attacked with hæmoptysis in April, 1846. Soon afterward the symptoms and signs of tuberculous disease became manifest, and death took place in the following June. On examination after death the lungs were found to contain infiltrated tuberculous deposits, some of which had undergone softening, and miliary tubercles in abundance. In addition to these appearances, at the apex of each lung was a solid mass nearly as large as a hen's egg, that on the right side being somewhat larger than that on the left. The surface over these masses presented a marked depression and a puckered appearance. On dividing the masses they appeared to consist of condensed parenchyma: they were of a reddish color, friable, and contained an abundance of minute calcareous particles. They were surrounded by a thick, firm wall isolating them from the adjacent pulmonary structure. Eighteen years before his death this patient had cough and other symptoms which were regarded at the time as denoting pulmonary phthisis. He recovered, and had good health up to the fatal illness. The only exception to this statement of his previous good health was the occurrence of a perineal fistula, which was nearly cured by division of the gut nine months before the hæmoptysis.

No one can doubt that tuberculous cavities may completely cicatrize. Instances in abundance have been observed since the publication of Laennec's treatise. The gradual contraction and final closure of a cavity may be observed during life, the cavernous signs becoming less marked, and at length disappearing. At the present time I see frequently two persons who have recovered from phthisis, recovery in one taking place nearly twenty, and in the other nearly ten, years ago. In these cases the cavernous respiration was well marked in situations in which now there is a feeble vesicular murmur. In both cases there is a circumscribed depression of the chest in these situations.

Recovery may be said to take place when cavities do not cicatrize, but remain, being lined by a membraniform structure and free from morbid products. Under these circumstances cavities are innocuous. There is an approximation to recovery when cavities furnish more or less matter of expectoration, the lungs elsewhere being free from tubercles or tuberculous products.

Recovery with calcification of tubercles is illustrated by the following case: A farmer from Illinois, aged forty, consulted me in June, 1843. Within the preceding four months he had from time to time expectorated calculi, some of which were of the size of a small pea, in great numbers. A hacking cough had existed for several months before he began to expectorate the calculi. At the time of the expectoration of these the cough was severe and he raised some bloody mucus. In the intervals the cough was slight and without expectoration. The examination of the chest was negative as regards any signs of disease. Thirteen years afterward this patient came to report his condition of health. The expectoration of calculi had continued for some {421} time after his former visit; then his cough ceased, and meanwhile he had been perfectly well.

It is a question whether the tuberculous product is ever absorbed. The fact that in some instances the physical signs in life and the appearances after death give no evidence of either tuberculous deposit or cavities, and the fact that tuberculous solidification is observed to diminish or disappear when apparently the deposit has not been expectorated, render it probable that under some circumstances absorption does take place to a greater or less extent. It is doubtless true that, as a rule, the deposit is not absorbed; the tuberculous affection in this respect affords a striking contrast to non-tuberculous pneumonia.

Cases of recovery from phthisis are cited by medical writers as proving the curability of the disease. The term curability implies that recovery is due to remedial agencies. It does not therefore embrace a truth of great importance in its bearing on the prognosis and the treatment--namely, the disease in certain cases ends in recovery purely from an intrinsic tendency. My clinical studies have furnished facts which conclusively establish this important truth. Out of a large number of cases (640) recorded during a period of thirty-four years, recovery took place in 44. In 23 of these 44 cases there were no measures of treatment to which the recovery could be attributed. The disease ended favorably in these 23 cases from self-limitation. This assertion does not express a conjecture or a theory, but a logical conclusion. Self-limitation, therefore, is a highly important element in prognosis; it is a highly important factor in the treatment. The claim in behalf of phthisis of self-limitation, based on the analysis of cases of recovery, was made by me nearly a quarter of a century ago.[21] It has not as yet received that recognition in medical literature which it is desirable that it should receive in view of the importance of its practical bearings. It will enter here into considerations connected with treatment and prognosis.

[Footnote 21: Vide _American Journal of the Medical Sciences_, January, 1858.]

Recovery from phthisis involves, of course, cessation of the progress of the disease. This cessation of progress may be due either to an intrinsic tendency or to arrest by measures of management, or to both combined. Recovery may or may not follow the cessation of progress. Owing to the disposition and the extent of the tuberculous affection, reparation of the lesions does not take place. It is a useful grouping of cases into--first, those which become non-progressive and end in recovery; and, second, those in which the cessation of progress is not followed by complete recovery. It is also useful to consider as forming a third group cases in which the progress of the disease is extremely slow. The cases in the latter group are the opposite to those in which the progress of the disease is continuous and rapid, giving rise to the name galloping consumption.

There is much significance in the fact that in cases of progressive phthisis the disease does not, as a rule, advance by a steady increase, but by a series of invasions. Successive eruptions of the tuberculous affection occur. In these eruptions the affection may be either small or moderate or considerable in amount. The intervals between them may be brief or long. The disease may end with a single eruption. This may be small or even slight, and followed quickly by recovery. There is reason to believe that instances of this kind are not infrequent. The phthisical affection may have been overlooked, or it is inferred from the recovery that there was an error in diagnosis. In the great majority of cases a series of eruptions occurs, and it is in this way that the disease is generally progressive. These clinical facts, regarded from the standpoint of the parasitic origin of phthisis, are to be explained by supposing that bacterial colonies invade at successive epochs different portions of the lungs, but that in a certain number of instances there is neither invasion nor migration of the parasite. {422} The occurrence of successive eruptions is made manifest by the symptoms and the physical signs. After the occurrence of a single eruption or a series, if there be no recurrence the recovery will depend, cæteris paribus, on the amount of the tuberculous affection.

The prognosis in individual cases involves clinical points which pertain to the symptoms and signs of the pulmonary affection, and to the symptomatic phenomena referable to other of the anatomical systems of the body. The latter are of importance as representing the constitutional condition or the cachexia, and as indicating either, on the one hand, self-limitation, or, on the other hand, a progressive tendency of the disease.

Other things being equal, the smaller the pulmonary affection the better the prognosis. But assuming that the first tuberculous eruption is small, it does not follow that other eruptions may not occur more or less speedily, and, assuming a considerable or a large eruption, another may not occur. The prognosis in the latter case is of course much the more favorable. In forming a judgment in respect of the prognosis, the amount of the pulmonary affection is less to be considered than the symptoms which relate to the progressive tendency of the disease and to its tolerance by the system. An unfavorable prognosis, however, is to be based on the existence of an amount of the pulmonary affection sufficient to compromise the respiratory function, as shown by notable increase of the frequency of the respirations and by dyspnoea. Hæmoptysis, as has been seen, if unaccompanied by other symptoms which are untoward, even if the hemorrhage be profuse, is not an unfavorable event. Microscopical examinations of the sputa afford important information bearing on the prognosis. Examinations, thus far, made by different observers, show that in proportion to the abundance of the parasite in the sputa the disease may be considered as actively progressing.

Important prognostics derived elsewhere than from symptoms referable to the pulmonary organs relate especially to the circulatory system, inclusive of the temperature of the body, to the digestive system, to the hæmatopoietic system, and to nutrition. Acceleration of the pulse is an unfavorable symptom. In proportion to the degree of acceleration, either activity of the progress or a want of tolerance of the tuberculous affection, or of both combined, is to be inferred. It is of course important, if practicable, to know the patient's normal pulse as the standard for comparison in individual cases, inasmuch as the frequency in health varies considerably in different persons. A febrile temperature is especially significant as a symptom of progressive phthisis. It is the best criterion of the activity of progress. There is no constant proportionate relation between the amount of the pulmonary affection, as shown by the local symptoms and the signs, and the elevation of temperature. Nor does the degree of fever correspond always with the acceleration of the pulse. Diurnal exacerbations of fever, with more or less profuse sweating, are evidences that the disease is progressive. Both fever and the rapid action of the heart not only have symptomatic significance, but they contribute to progressive exhaustion.

Impaired power of digestion and anorexia are bad prognostics. Especially bad is a degree of anorexia in which not only no desire for food is felt, but it is so loathed as to render adequate alimentation impossible. Diarrhoea, although not dependent on tuberculous disease of the intestine, is a bad prognostic, as denoting impairment of the digestive processes. Notable pallor, whether an effect of deficient alimentation or referable to the hæmatopoietic system, weighs heavily against the expectation of improvement. A considerable emaciation has even greater weight. Whenever in the progress of the disease the patient becomes notably pale and emaciated, there is little ground for hope, especially if there be conjoined muscular debility, a rapid pulse, and a high temperature. It is unnecessary to attempt a clinical picture of the {423} disease as it is presented toward the close of life. The reality is unhappily too familiar to every observer.

The picture just referred to has another side. The disease is not always progressive. There is reason to believe that its progress is sometimes arrested. It ceases to progress in some cases from self-limitation. In a certain proportion of cases recovery takes place. What, then, is the basis for a favorable prognosis? In general terms, it is the absence of the unfavorable prognostics which have been mentioned. The prognosis is favorable in proportion as the action of the heart is but little disturbed, the temperature of the body non-febrile, the appetite and digestion but little affected, the complexion not much changed, and the nutrition of the body fairly maintained. The inference under these circumstances is that the disease does not tend to progress, and that the existing pulmonary affection is well tolerated. The ground for encouragement is greater the less in amount the pulmonary affection; but even if the symptoms and signs show the latter to be considerable or even large, encouragement is warrantable so long as there is evidence of non-progression and tolerance. It is not, however, to be forgotten that there is always more or less danger of a renewed tuberculous eruption.

The suspension of menstruation belongs among the unfavorable events, but alone it has not great significance. Its occurrence as respects the previous duration of the disease varies much in different cases. In some cases menstruation continues nearly to the close of life. The return of menstruation after its suspension for a greater or less period is a favorable prognostic.

The occurrence of certain complications is of marked importance with reference to the prognosis. Perforation of lung followed by pleurisy and pneumothorax is in most instances speedily fatal. On the other hand, simple pleurisy with effusion, in some instances at least, seems to have a favorable effect upon the pulmonary affection. Tuberculous ulcerations of the intestine preclude the expectation of improvement and hasten the fatal termination. Tuberculous peritonitis is a fatal prognostic. Chronic laryngitis, if it interfere with alimentation, is a serious complication, but if that effect be wanting it is not unfavorable as regards its significance in prognosis. Perineal fistula is not unfavorable, to say the least. Renal disease, and any accidental complication sufficient in itself to tell more or less against the powers of life, must be regarded as telling proportionately upon the prognosis.