Skip to content

Chapter XIII: TECHNOLOGY.--Future Prospects for Gas Companies.--By Mr (5)

Text size

In August, 1885, a star of about seventh magnitude made its appearance close to the nucleus of the Great Nebula in Andromeda--a well-known object visible to the naked eye, and which has been well called "the Queen of the Nebulae." The new star was independently discovered by several observers toward the end of August, but seems to have been first certainly seen by Mr. T. W. Ward, of Belfast, on August 19, at 11 P.M. At Greenwich observatory the spectrum of the new star was found "of precisely the same character as that of the nebula, _i. e._, it was perfectly continuous, no lines, either bright or dark, being visible, and the red end was wanting." Dr. Huggins, however, on September 9, thought he could see from three to five bright lines in its spectrum. The star gradually faded away, and on February 7, 1886, was estimated only sixteenth magnitude in the 26 inch refractor of the naval observatory at Washington. From a series of measures by Prof. Asaph Hall he found "no certain indications of any parallax," so that evidently the star and the nebula, in which it probably lies, are situated at an immense distance from the earth. Prof. Seeliger has investigated the decrease in light of the star on the hypothesis that it was a cooling body, which had been suddenly raised to an intense heat by the shock of a collision, and finds a fair agreement between theory and observation. Anwers points out the similarity between this outburst and the new star of 1860 in the cluster 80 Messier, and thinks it very probable that both phenomena were due to physical changes in the nebulae in which they occurred.

With reference to the colors of the stars, some of the red stars have been suspected to vary in color. The bright star Sirius is supposed--from the description of it by ancient astronomers--to have been originally red, but this seems very doubtful. The Persian astronomer Al Sufi, in his "Description of the Heavens," written in the tenth century, describes the well-known variable star Algol distinctly as a red star. It is now white, and this is perhaps the best attested instance on record of change of color in a bright star.--_Naturalists' Monthly._

THE COMMON DANDELION.

By FREDERICK LEROY SARGENT.

In the various names which the dandelion has received, we see expressed, for the most part, either a reference to the tooth-like recurved lobes of the leaves, Fig. 1, or an allusion to the medicinal properties of the plant. Thus, our English name is a modified form of the French _dent de lion_, meaning lion's tooth, and in German we have the same idea expressed in _Loewenzahn_. Fifty years ago this plant appeared in the botanies as _Leontodon taraxicum_, the generic name being derived from the Greek _leon_, lion, and _odons_, tooth, and the specific from the Greek _tarasso_, to stir up, in reference to the effect of a dose. In later works we find the genus _Leontodon_, including the "fall dandelion" (_L. autumnale_), but not the true dandelion, which now appears in a genus by itself under the name _Taraxicum Densleonis_. Here the specific name is merely "lion's tooth" again, in Latin.

Finally, in the latest works our plant is given as _Taraxicum officinale_, since this has been found to be the name which, according to the rules of botanical nomenclature, takes precedence of all others. An allusion to the teeth is thus no longer retained, the only reference remaining being to the plant's officinal use.

To the majority of people the mention of the dandelion calls to mind not so much its medicinal properties as its use for food. Although its cultivation, either as a spring pot herb or as a salad with blanched leaves, is comparatively modern, the wild plant seems to have been long valued as a vegetable. There is reason to believe that the Romans made use of it as a pot herb, and Chinese writers of the fourteenth century mention its being eaten in their country, although there is no evidence of cultivation at that time.

There are but few of our flowering plants that grow so widespread over the world. It occurs in North America from the Atlantic to the Pacific coast, in Europe, in Asia, and in the Arctic regions. This extensive range may in part be accounted for by the fact that our plant belongs to the large and aggressive family of the _Compositae_, and is thus related to such invaders as daisies, burdocks, and thistles. Still, the dandelion has more to recommend it than mere family connection; for, despite its lowly aspect, it is no poor relation, but, as we shall hope to show in the present article, it has many virtues of its own which entitle it to respect.

Prominent among these is its adaptability to the different conditions under which it grows. It seems to make the best of everything. If by chance a seed falls upon poor, thin soil, the young plant sends forth, as rapidly as possible, a rosette of leaves pressed close to the earth. And thus, on the principle that "possession is nine points of the law," it secures for its roots the use of a certain amount of territory quite safe from the encroachments of other plants. In rich ground the case is quite different, for here there is so much nutriment in a small quantity of earth, that the struggle for soil is not such a life and death matter as in the less favored localities. Consequently we find a large number of plants crowded together as close as they can stand; and it is obvious that if, under these circumstances, the dandelion should develop a flat rosette of leaves, the grass and other plants growing around would soon overshadow it, and it would have small chance for life.

Our plant, therefore, extends its leaves upward, and does its best to elongate them so as to keep pace with the growth of its rivals. But as these are for the most part grasses and plants which grow by elongation of the stem, the race for sunshine is rather in favor of these other plants, for the reason that a given amount of material put into a stem makes a stiffer organ than when put into a leaf. Still, even with these odds against it, the dandelion seems well able to hold its own, for it probably derives more or less advantage from the recurved lobes, or teeth, which give the plant its name. These are admirably fitted to act in much the same manner as a ratchet; and when the neighboring grasses are blown against the dandelion, a blade may slide along the margin of the leaf toward the base; but, as it springs back from its own elasticity, it cannot slide in the opposite direction, for a tooth will catch it, and thus force it to help support the leaf, and hold it up to the sunshine. We need not stop to consider how the dandelion behaves in soil which is neither very rich nor very poor, for enough has been said to show that it has not much to fear from any rivals it may meet under ordinary circumstances.

It is not only against the aggressions of neighboring plants, however, that our dandelion needs to be prepared. It is at least equally important for its welfare that it have some means of protection against herbivorous animals--not only such as might eat its leaves, but also the more stealthy ones that live upon the food which plants store underground. All such foes it thwarts by a means as simple as it is efficient. Every part of the plant contains a milky juice which is intensely bitter, and a first taste is quite enough to convince the most stupid animal that raw dandelion is not good eating, and most animals know enough to let it severely alone. Curiously enough, however, in this, as in many other cases, it happens that what in nature acts to deter animals from eating the plant, with man offers the chief attraction, for it is this very bitter principle (_taraxacin_) which gives to dandelion greens their peculiar flavor, and affords the essential element in the extract which physicians prescribe.

The store of food, referred to above, which the dandelion accumulates in its root, not infrequently enables it to pass, almost unharmed, through dangers that with less provident plants would surely prove fatal. For example, it must often happen that from drought or from being trampled upon by animals, the leaves become wholly or in part destroyed. Now, if there were no reserve store of food, the plant would have no chance of rallying; but as it is, this food supplies the material for new growth, and upon the return of favorable conditions, fresh leaves are developed, and the plant lives on as before. Primarily, of course, the purpose of this storage of food is to enable the plant to live on from year to year, resting in the winter, and in the spring beginning work again with a good start.

In comparing the higher with the lower plants, the superiority of the former is most beautifully shown in the better provision which is made for the welfare of offspring; and in this regard our dandelion stands among the highest. Before we can understand the ways in which our little plant performs this part of its life work, we must briefly consider the structure of the blossom.

If with a sharp knife we cut a blossom in halves, from the stem upward, the parts represented in Fig. 2 will be disclosed. Surmounting the stalk is a cushion-like receptacle, R, from the top of which arise a number of tiny flowers, F, while from the side grow out a series of green scales, S, forming an involucre around the whole. A single one of these florets, Fig. 3, exhibits the following parts: First, a bright yellow corolla, C O, tubular below, but strap-shaped above, as if a tube had been split for part of the way on one side, and the upper part flattened. Second, five stamens, S K, attached by slender filaments, F M, to the tubular part of the corolla, and with their anthers or pollen sacs, A N, joined together by the edges to form a tube. Third, a single pistil having a long style, S Y, which, above, passes through the anther tube, and bears at its end two diverging stigmas, S G, and below connects by a short neck, N, with the small ovary, O, which contains a solitary ovule. Fourth, a calyx, C X, composed of numerous slender bristles.

The purpose of these complex structures is, of course, in one way or another to secure the development of the ovule into a seed fitted to produce a new plant. This development will proceed only after the ovule has been influenced (_i. e._, fertilized) by pollen placed upon the stigma; but when once the mysterious process of fertilization has taken place, then there follows immediately those wonderful changes in the blossom which culminate in the ripening of the fruit.

There are but two possible ways in which fertilization may be secured; either the pollen which affects the ovule must come from the same flower (then called close fertilization), or the pollen must come from another flower of the same kind (cross fertilization). Now, while either of these methods will insure the production of a seed, numerous experiments go to show that those offspring which result from cross fertilization are in many ways superior to those which are produced from close fertilization; and it is to the advantages of cross fertilization that we have to look for an explanation of the significance of many peculiar structures, not only of the dandelion, but of flowers in general.

It is obvious that, to secure cross fertilization, there must be some agent to transfer the pollen from one plant to another. Most commonly, either the wind is taken advantage of for this purpose, as with elms, pines, grasses, etc., or else flying insects are induced to perform the office, as is the case with the majority of our familiar flowers. The wind is a very wasteful carrier, so that for every grain that is properly placed, thousands, or even millions, may be lost. Insects, on the contrary, waste but little; and, moreover, as Aristotle so shrewdly observed, they habitually confine their visits, for a number of trips, exclusively to the flowers of one species.

The dandelion seems to fully appreciate the great advantages of securing the services of insects, for it appeals most strongly to their love of bright colors and their passion for sweets. As the flowers open, each tiny golden cup is filled to the brim with purest nectar, and he must be a very dull insect, indeed, that cannot see the brilliant head of flowers as far as he can see anything. At any rate, it is not the dandelion's fault if he does not, for the blossom is placed where it will be as conspicuous as possible. If the surrounding herbage is tall, the flower stalk is elongated, so that the crown of flowers may not be obscured. If the plants around are low-lying, it would be wasteful to have a long stalk, so it has a short one, sometimes so short that the blossom looks like a button in the center of the leaf rosette. Economy of material is furthermore shown in the fact that the stalk is always hollow, for it is a principle well known to builders that, when there is required a pillar of a given strength, less material is needed for the tubular form than for the solid cylinder.

But to return to our flower. We have next to consider how the visits of insects are utilized to secure cross fertilization. If we examine the anther tube of a flower that has just opened, Fig. 4, we shall see that the style has not yet protruded, but fills the entire cavity, except such space as is occupied by a quantity of pollen which the anthers have shed. So much of the style as is within the tube is thickly beset with hairs that point upward; and when the lower portion elongates, this hairy part brushes the pollen out of the tube, and protrudes, covered with the yellow dust, Fig. 5. At this stage, an insect coming for nectar must rub against the style, and so become more or less covered with pollen. None of it, however, can get upon the stigmas, for they are not yet exposed. After a short time has elapsed, during which much of the pollen has probably been rubbed off, the style is seen to split at the top; and as the halves separate and roll back, Fig. 3, their inner faces (the stigmas) are exposed. If, now, the flower be visited by an insect which has previously been to a younger flower, the pollen he brings will be deposited upon the stigmas as he rubs against them, and cross fertilization will be effected.

Let us suppose, however, that no insect visits the blossom--and this must often happen to such as appear very early in the spring or late in the fall, when hardly any insects are around. In such cases we find that seeds are produced, and therefore we must infer that fertilization has in some way or other been secured. An examination of a flower still older than any we have considered, Fig. 6, will show us what takes place. Here it will be seen that, after the stigmas have diverged, they continue to roll back, until a coil of one or more turns has been made; and as a result of this the stigmatic surface comes in contact with the hairs on the style, and touches the pollen grains entangled by them. Still, the close fertilization thus accomplished is only a last resort, and it can only occur in the event of insects' visits having failed; for when pollen from another flower has once fallen on the stigma, no pollen coming afterward can have the least effect. Thus, we have another instance of the dandelion's ability to make the best of its surroundings.

It even adapts itself to the weather; for when the sun shines, the scales of the involucre bend back, and the blossom is expanded to its fullest extent; but in dull weather, or at night, the scales bend inward, and the blossom is tightly closed. The advantages of this remarkable movement, with its implied sensitiveness, is obvious when we consider that insects are abroad only in sunshine, while at other times there is danger of dew or rain getting into the nectar, and so spoiling it for the insects.

After fertilization has been accomplished throughout the blossom, the involucre closes, and remains closed during the ripening of the fruit. The changes which now take place are as follows: In each flower the corolla, stamens, and style, being of no further use, wither, and sever their connection with the ovary; the ovule develops into a seed containing a tiny plantlet well provided with food for its use during germination; the ovary grows to keep pace with the seed, its tissues become hardened, and a number of spine-like projections develop near the upper part; and finally the short neck which bears the calyx bristles elongates, pushing upward the withered parts of the flower. At this stage the involucral scales bend back through an arc of about 180 deg., the cushion-like receptacle becomes almost spherically convex, the fruits radiate in all directions, the bristles spread, and a beautiful cluster of little parachutes is presented to the wind.

Even a glance at one of these fruits, Fig. 7, is sufficient to discover a wonderful fitness for transportation by wind, and more careful study shows that this fitness pervades every detail. For example, on examining the bristles microscopically, Fig. 8, it is shown that they are not simple threads, but each is hollow and has numerous projections extending on either side, all of which serves to increase the buoyancy in a very effective way.

The experience of aeronauts has shown that a highly important part in the equipment of a balloon, after the attainment of buoyancy, is the provision of some means of arresting the balloon's progress when the destination has been reached. One of the most successful means which they employ is the grappling hook; and as we find the base of our diminutive parachute provided with a number of upwardly directed spines, it seems fair to conclude that these serve to arrest the fruit upon favorable soil. If it comes to rest upon a smooth surface--which, of course, would be barren--the next breeze would easily blow it away; but if it chance to fall on soil or among other plants, the effect of the spines would be to retain it against the power of even a strong wind. Thus, we may leave it safely landed upon good soil, ready to begin under favorable conditions the cycle of its wonderful life.--_Popular Science News._

SYSTEMATIC RELATIONS OF PLATYPSYLLUS, AS DETERMINED BY THE LARVA.[12]

By DR. C. V. RILEY.

There is always a great deal of interest attaching to organisms which are unique in character and which systematists find difficulty in placing in any of their schemes of classification. A number of instances will occur to every working naturalist, and I need only refer to Limulus, and the extensive literature devoted, during the past decade, to the discussion of its true position, as a marked and well-known illustration. In hexapods the common earwig and flea are familiar illustrations. These osculant or aberrant forms occur most among parasitic groups, as the Stylopidae, Hippoboscidae, Pulicidae, Mallophaga, etc. Probably no hexapod, however, has more interested entomologists than _Platypsyllus castoris_ Ritsema, a parasite of the beaver. I cannot better illustrate the diversity of opinion respecting its true position in zoology than by giving an epitome of the more important literature upon it.

[12] Read at the meeting of the National Academy of Sciences, April 20, 1888.

J. Ritsema, in _Petites Nouvelles Entomologiques_ for September 15, 1869, described the species as _Platypsyllus castoris_. He found it on some American beavers (_Castor canadensis_) in the zoological garden of Rotterdam. He considered it to "undoubtedly" belong to the Suctoria of De Geer, and to form a new genus of Pulicidae.

In the same year, in the _Tijdschrift voor Entomologie_, 2d ser., vol. v., p. 185 (which I have not seen), the same author publishes what is apparently a redescription of the insect. He gives his views more fully as to its systematic position, considering that it belongs to the Aphaniptera, and is equivalent to the Pulicidae.

In the same year, Prof. J. O. Westwood (having previously read a description of the species, November 9, 1868, before the Ashmolean Society of Oxford) published in the _Entomologist's Monthly Magazine_, vol. vi., October, 1869, pp. 118-119, a full characterization of the insect under the name of _Platypsyllus castorinus_. A new order, _Achreioptera_, is established upon the species, which he very aptly likens, in general appearance, to a cross between a flattened flea and a diminutive cockroach. "The abnormal economy of the insect, its remarkable structure, the apparent want of mandibles, our ignorance of its transformations, and the possibility that the creature may be homomorphous in the larva and pupa states," are the reasons assigned for establishing the new order, and here Prof. Westwood is perfectly consistent, as in his famous "Introduction to the Classification of Insects" the Forficulidae are placed in the order Euplexoptera; the Thripidae in the order Thysanoptera; the Phryganeidae in the order Thrichoptera; the Stylopidae in the order Strepsiptera; and the Pulicidae in the order Aphaniptera.

In 1872, Dr. J. L. Le Conte published his paper "On _Platypsyllidae_, a New Family of Coleoptera" (Proc. Zool. Soc. of London for 1872, pp. 779-804, pl. lxviii.), in which he shows that _Platypsylla_ is undoubtedly coleopterous and cannot possibly be referred to the Aphaniptera. Careful descriptions and figures of anatomical details are given, and he finds that its affinities are very composite, but in the direction of the Adephagous and Clavicorn series. Its most convenient place is shown to be between the _Hydrophilidae_ and _Leptinidae_. There seems to be no good reason why the name _Platypsyllus_ is here changed to _Platypsylla_, a spelling adopted by most subsequent American writers.

In 1874, Prof. Westwood, in the "_Thesaurus Entomologicus Oxoniensis_" (Oxford, 1874), p. 194, pl. xxxvii., gives figures with details; reprints his previous diagnosis, and maintains his previous course in erecting a new order for the insect, without giving any additional reasons.

In 1880, P. Megnin, in "Les Parasites et les maladies parasitaires," etc., Paris, 1880, gives (pp. 66-67) a description of the family "Platypsyllines" without expressing an opinion concerning the systematic position. He also describes and figures the species.

In 1882, Dr. Geo. H. Horn (Trans. Amer. Ent. Soc., x., 1882-83; Monthly Proc., Feb. 10, 1882, p. ii.) exhibited drawings illustrating the anatomy of _Platypsylla_ and _Leptinus_, and showed that a close relationship exists between these genera. Later, in his "Notes on Some Little Known Genera and Species of Coleoptera" (Trans. Amer. Ent. Soc., x., 1882-83, pp. 113-126, pl. v., 114-116), he reviews the characters, and explains and illustrates the anatomical details. The differences he points out between his observations and those of Le Conte are more particularly in the mandibles. In connection with this paper he also describes and illustrates the structure of Leptinillus, which he separates from Leptinus, and demonstrates their close relationship with Platypsyllus.

In 1883, Le Conte and Horn, in their "Classification of the Coleoptera of North America" (Washington, Smithsonian Institution, 1883), give (pp. 13-15) a full description of the family characters, a little modified from Le Conte's first description, but sustaining his views on the systematic position of _Platypsyllidae_.

In 1883, Alphonse Bonhoure (Ann. Soc. de France, 1883; Bull, des Seances, p. cxxvi.) exhibited drawings and specimens of _Platypsyllus castoris_ found in the _Departement des Bouches du Rhone_.

In 1884, Edm. Reitter, in "_Platypsylla castoris_ Rits. als Vertreter einer neuer europaischen Coleopteren-Familie" (Wiener entom. Zeit. iii., 1884, pp. 19-21) gives a lengthy description of the species with special regard to the sexual differences. He shows that the European insect is not specifically distinct from the American form, but he does not express an opinion on the position of the family among the Coleoptera.

In the same year, Bonhoure (Ann. Soc. Ent. de France, 1884, pp. 143-153) more fully records its discovery on _Castor fiber_ taken in the Petit-Rhone. It is a question whether this European beaver, now quite rare, is distinct from ours. He gives a very good review of the subject, with a plate of the most important details, after Horn, and he fully indorses the coleopterological position of the insect.

In the same year Ritsema (_Tijdschrift voor Entomologie_, 1883-84, lxxxvi.) refers to Bonhoure's discovery of _Platypsylla_ in France, and corrects Reitter in some unimportant details.

In 1885, Reitter, in "_Coleopterologische Notizen_" xiii. (Wiener entomolog. Zeit., vol. iv., 1885, p. 274), answers Ritsema's criticism.

In the same year, Dr. Friederich Brauer, in his masterly "Systematisch-zoologische Studien" (Sitzh. der Kais. Akad. der Wissensch., xci., p. 364), speaks of the relationship in the thoracic characters between Mallophaga and Coleoptera as illustrated by Platypsyllus, by inference admitting the coleopterous nature of the latter, but recognizing that it has mallophagous affinities.

In 1886, H. J. Kolbe, in his "Ueber die Stellung von Platypsyllus im System" (Berlin entom. Zeitsch., xxx., 1886, pp. 103-105), discusses the subject, without any new evidence, however. He concludes that most of its characteristics relate it to the Corrodentia, and particularly to the sub-order Mallophaga, in which it has its closest kinship in Liotheidae. The remarkable tripartite mentum he thinks should not be compared with the bipartite mentum of Leptinus, and calls attention to the fact that in Ancistrona in Mallophaga it is also trilobed.

The above are the more important papers on the subject, though the insect has been referred by other authors to both Neuroptera and Orthoptera.

CHARACTERS OF PLATYPSYLLUS.

Where the characters of the image have been so often described, it is unnecessary to refer to them in detail, and I will only call attention to the more striking structural features and to some omissions by, or differences between, previous authors. A glance at the illustrations which I have prepared will show the prevailing characteristics of this interesting creature, its general ovoid and flattened form, and more particularly the flattened semicircular head. Dorsally, we notice the rather prominent occiput fringed behind with short and broad depressed spines or teeth which form a sort of comb, the prothorax trapezoidal and but very slightly curved, with side margins strongly grooved. There is a very distinct scutellem, and the two elytra are rounded at the tip and without venation. Hind wings and eyes are both wanting. The abdomen shows five segments, each with a row of depressed bristles.

On the ventral surface we find among the more curious characteristics, first the antennae; these were originally described by Westwood as three-jointed, the club being annulated. Le Conte could not distinctly make out the number of annular joints upon this club, though he thought he detected seven, which made nine joints to the whole antenna. The club is received in the deep cup-shaped excavation of the second joint. Horn thought he detected a division of the second joint, and resolved but six segments in the club, making also nine joints to the whole antenna, but in a somewhat different fashion from Le Conte. Westwood's figure shows eight annuli to the club. He failed to find any trace of the mandibles, but Le Conte described them as small, flat, subquadrate, with the inner side deeply crenulate, and resembling those of _Corylophus_; the stipes well developed, and biarticulate. Horn could not entirely make out the mandibles as described by Le Conte, and rather concluded that what Le Conte described is really one of the granules which occur behind the labrum. He considered that the piece could hardly be even an aborted mandible, because of its diminutive size.

What all authors have agreed in calling the mentum is very noticeable, being large and broad, and trilobed behind. The maxillae are strong, with complicated stipes and with two flat, thin lobes, the inner one smaller than the outer and rounded at the tip, both lobes being ciliate. The maxillary palpi are four-jointed, the labial palpi three-jointed. The prosternum is very large, subtriangular, concealing the insertion of the coxae, and extending over the front part of the mesosternum, as does this over the front of the metasternum. Six ventral segments of the abdomen are visible behind the posterior coxae, which conceal two and the base of a third. The coxae are flat and not at all prominent. The legs are characterized by broad and flattened tibiae and femora, and the strong spines with which they are armed. The tarsi are five-jointed, the front and middle pair with a row of claviform membraneous appendages each side, which Le Conte found only in the male.

American entomologists have been satisfied to follow Le Conte and Horn as to the position of Platypsyllus. Yet with such diversity of opinion on the subject among high European authorities, the importance of a knowledge of the adolescent states has been recognized, as the character of either the larva or pupa would settle the question.

During a stay at West Point, Neb., in October, 1886, I learned from one of my agents, Mr. Lawrence Bruner, that there was a beaver in a creek not far from that point, and I at once made arrangements for him to trap the beaver, and to look particularly for living specimens of Platypsyllus on the skin, and especially the earlier stages. He succeeded in capturing the beaver and sent me some fifteen specimens of the larva and also some imagos, but neither eggs nor pupae were found. A glance at the larva satisfied me at once of its coleopterous nature; but as we have, waiting to be worked up and published, an _embarras de richesses entomologiques_ in the collections of the National Museum, and as circumstances largely decide the precedence, I should probably not have called attention to this larva for some time, had it not been that at the last monthly meeting of the Entomological Society of Washington, Dr. Horn, who was present, announced the finding, the present spring, by one of his correspondents, of this very larva, and exhibited a specimen. Some points about it, and especially the position of the spiracles, being yet rather obscure in his mind, he requested me to examine my material, which I have thus been led to do. I have made a figure of this larva which will sufficiently indicate its nature.

The general form of the trophi, and particularly the anal cerci, fully settle the disputed point, and remove this insect completely from the Mallophaga (none of which possess them), and confirm its position in the Clavicorn series of the Coleoptera. Yet in the larva, as in the imago, the effects of its parasitic life are shown in certain modifications which approach the running section of the Mallophaga. Without going into details I may say that, besides its general and more decided coleopterological features, this larva is distinguished by the shortness and stoutness of its legs, by the size and stoutness of the antennae, by the stiff and long depressed hairs on the dorsal and more particularly on the ventral surface, and by the dorsal position of the abdominal spiracles, all characters approaching the Mallophaga. The first pair of spiracles is lateral, and may be said to be mesothoracic, being placed on the mesothoracic joint, but on a distinct fold. The eight abdominal spiracles are placed on the sides of the dorsum, and in this respect recall the parasitic triungulin of the meloid larvae. The mandibles are barely corneous, and they are more elongate and curved in the younger than in the older larva, while the legs are also relatively stouter, more curved, and with a much longer and sharper claw in the younger larva, which seems well fitted for grasping the hairs of its host.

There can no longer be any doubt, therefore, about the true position of Platypsyllus. The eggs will probably be found attached in some way to the hairs of the animal they are laid on, much as they are in Mallophaga, and the pupa is probably formed in the nests of the host, and not upon the skin, which will explain the reason for its not occurring with the larva and imago upon the beaver, either in the case of my specimens or those of Dr. Horn.

The greatest resemblance of Platypsyllus in the imago state to the Mallophaga is found in the spinous comb on the hind border of the occiput, the arrangement of the spines on the abdomen, and the superficial antennal structure, but particularly in the broad trilobed mentum. All of the other characteristics are readily referable to the Coleoptera, though, as Le Conte pointed out, they are composite, recalling in the antennae the Grynidae, in the pronotum the Silphidae, in the mesosternum Limulodes, in the elytra the Staphilindae, in the legs the Anisotomidae, and in the mandibles the Corylophidae. The scutellum and the five-jointed tarsi at once remove it from Mallophaga, and it is a wonder that Le Conte and Horn have not more fully insisted on this fact. The trophi are very complicated, and there are various details of structure not noticed or not mentioned by any of the writers upon the subject hitherto.

I have been led to very carefully examine the imago, and the more closely I have done so, the more completely I realize the accuracy of Le Conte's original work. The mandibles are visible or not, according as they are exposed or withdrawn, and their existence may depend on the sex, as, so far as my material justifies conclusion, they are visible in the male only. Where found they correspond to Le Conte's description. Even in the larva they are weak and of doubtful service in mastication, while in the imago they are, as is also the labrum, quite rudimentary, which fact hardly justifies us, however, in arguing their non-existence.

As confirmatory of the affinities of Platypsyllus, as here proved, it may be mentioned that _Leptinus testaceous_ Mull., the only species of its genus, is known to be parasitic on mice, as it has been found upon them in Philadelphia by Dr. Jno. A. Ryder, and I have taken it in the nests of a common field mouse near Washington. But still more interesting is the fact that _Leptinillus validus_ Horn (also the only species of its genus) is an associate parasite of Platypsyllus on the beaver, a number of both having been taken by one of my agents, Mr. A. Koebele, in San Francisco, from beaver skins brought from Alaska.

In reference to the classificatory value that should be attached to an aberrant type like this, I have already expressed my opinion in a paper on Megathymus, a Lepidopteron that connects in many ways the two great divisions of butterflies and moths, published in the Transactions of the Academy of Sciences of St. Louis, volume iii., 1876, and will take the liberty of reading a few passages therefrom:

"Between all classificatory divisions, from variety to kingdom,
the separating lines we draw get more and more broken in
proportion as our knowledge of forms, past and present,
increases. Every step in advance toward a true conception of the
relations of animals brings the different groups closer
together, until at last we perceive an almost continuous chain.
Even the older naturalists had an appreciation of this fact.
Linnaeus' noted dictum, '_Natura saltus non facit_' implies it;
and Kirby and Spence justly observe that 'it appears to be the
opinion of most modern physiologists that the series of
affinities in nature is a concatenation or continuous series;
and that though an hiatus is here and there observable, this has
been caused either by the annihilation of some original group or
species, or that the objects required to fill it up are still in
existence but have not yet been discovered.'"

"Modern naturalists find in this more or less gradual blending
their strongest arguments in favor of community of descent; and
speculation as to the origin, or outcome rather, in the near
present or remote past of existing forms is naturally and very
generally indulged, even by those who a few years back were more
inclined to ridicule than accept Darwinian doctrine. Shall we
then say that the old divisions must be discarded because not
absolute? As well might we argue for the abolition of the four
seasons because they differ with the latitude, or because they
gradually blend into each other. Entomologists will always speak
of moths and butterflies, howsoever arbitrary the groups may
come to be looked upon, or however numerous the intermediate
gradations."

"Families should, I think, be made as comprehensive as possible,
and not unduly multiplied; and in considering aberrant forms,
the objects of classification are best subserved by retaining
them in whatever division can claim the balance of characters.
It is better to widen than to restrict in the higher groups. Le
Conte does better service in bringing Platypsylla among the
Coleoptera than does Westwood in creating a new order--
Achreioptera--for it. Phylloxera, in Homoptera, is much more
wisely retained in the Aphididae than made the type of a new
family."

Platypsyllus, therefore, is a good Coleopteron, and in all the characters in which it so strongly approaches the Mallophaga it offers merely an illustration of modification due to food habit and environment. In this particular it is, however, of very great interest as one of the most striking illustrations we have of variation in similar lines through the influence of purely external or dynamical conditions, and where genetic connection and heredity play no part whatever. It is at the same time interesting because of its synthetic characteristics, being evidently an ancient type from which we get a very good idea of the connection in the past of some of the present well-defined orders of insects.

Westwood, though now an octogenarian, may safely be called England's most eminent entomologist by virtue of the character and volume of the work which he has accomplished. Dr. Le Conte was, _facile princeps_, America's leading coleopterist. I do not know that any greater tribute could be added to the sound judgment and deep knowledge possessed by that late distinguished member of the Academy than the confirmation of his views as opposed to the views of Westwood and other European authorities which the discovery of this larva now gives us.

THE SPECTRA OF OXYGEN.

The author has observed a fact which furnishes a remarkable demonstration of the law of the production of the dark bands which he has detected in the spectrum of oxygen. The phenomena of elective absorption in oxygen gas are manifested in two mutually distinct spectral systems. A first system, formed of fine rays, follows the law of the product of the gaseous system traversed by its density. The second system is formed of bands much less easily resolved, is governed by the law of the product of the thickness by the square of the density. This second law being quite novel in spectral analysis, the author has instituted experiments necessary to prove that this system of obscure bands really belongs to oxygen. These experiments range from pressures of 100 atmospheres down to those of a few units, and with lengths of tubes from 0.42 meter to 60 meters. At the same time prolonged observations have been made upon the atmosphere, brought into connection with the experiments in the tubes. These observations, and especially those made during autumn last on the Pic du Midi, prove that all the bands of the spectrum of oxygen are found in the spectrum of the solar light if it is allowed to traverse a sufficient thickness of the atmospheric medium. Further, on comparing, by the aid of photography, the intensities of the bands of the atmospheric spectrum with those given in the tubes, the author has found that the intensities of these atmospheric bands fulfill the law of the square. It appears from _Wiedemann's Annalen_ that M. Olszewski, when liquefying oxygen, examined its spectrum and ascertained the existence of the bands in question with a stratum of 7 mm. of liquid oxygen.--_J. Jansen._

ON A THEORY CONCERNING THE SUDDEN LOSS OF MAGNETIC PROPERTIES
OF IRON AND NICKEL.

By Mr. H. TOMLINSON, B.A.

Experiments by himself and other observers have shown that the temperatures at which iron and nickel lose their magnetic properties depend on the specimens used and the magnetizing forces employed; but the temperatures at which they _begin to lose_ these properties are definite--for nickel about 300 deg. C., and iron about 680 deg. C. The author's own experiments on "Recalescence of Iron" show two critical temperatures; and Pinchon has shown by calorimetric measurement that between 660 deg. and 720 deg. C., and between 1,000 deg. and 1,050 deg. C., heat becomes latent. All these facts seem to indicate a molecular rearrangement about these temperatures.

In his proposed theory he assumes that the molecules of iron (say) contain magnetic atoms capable of motions of translation and of rotation. These tend to form closed magnetic circuits, but at ordinary temperatures are unable to do so on account of the close proximity of their centers. On raising the temperature their centers are further separated, till at about 680 deg. C. their polar extremities rush together, forming complete circuits and exhibiting no external magnetic properties. On cooling down, the centers approach until the gravitation attraction overcomes the magnetic attraction of their poles, when the magnetic properties reappear.

Prof. Ayrton asked whether the author had made experiments on the reappearance of magnetic properties when raised to a white heat, and Prof. Thompson inquired whether cobalt had been tested. Both questions were answered negatively.

POISON OF THE SOMALIS, EXTRACTED FROM THE WOOD OF THE OUABAIO.

The principle in question, ouabaine, forms rectangular plates, very slender, of a nacreous appearance. It is absolutely white, inodorous, and not appreciably bitter. It contains no nitrogen, and does not react with coloring matters. At a boiling heat, in presence of dilute acids, it is split up, yielding a reductive sugar. Its composition is C_{90}H_{45}O_{12}. It is poisonous if introduced into the circulation, but not if swallowed.--_M. Arnaud, in Comptes Rendus._

(Advertisements.)

A New Catalogue of Valuable Papers

Contained in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN SUPPLEMENT during the past ten years, sent _free of charge_ to any address. MUNN & CO., 361 Broadway, New York.

* * * * *

THE SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN

Architects and Builders Edition.

$2.50 a Year. Single Copies, 25 cts.

This is a Special Edition of the SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, issued monthly--on the first day of the month. Each number contains about forty large quarto pages, equal to about two hundred ordinary book pages, forming, practically, a large and splendid =Magazine of Architecture=, richly adorned with _elegant plates in colors_ and with fine engravings, illustrating the most interesting examples of modern Architectural Construction and allied subjects.

A special feature is the presentation in each number of a variety of the latest and best plans for private residences, city and country, including those of very moderate cost as well as the more expensive. Drawings in perspective and in color are given, together with full Plans, Specifications, Costs, Bills of Estimate, and Sheets of Details.

No other building paper contains so many plans, details, and specifications regularly presented as the SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN. Hundreds of dwellings have already been erected on the various plans we have issued during the past year, and many others are in process of construction.

Architects, Builders, and Owners will find this work valuable in furnishing fresh and useful suggestions. All who contemplate building or improving homes, or erecting structures of any kind, have before them in this work an almost _endless series of the latest and best examples_ from which to make selections, thus saving time and money.

Many other subjects, including Sewerage, Piping, Lighting, Warming, Ventilating, Decorating, Laying out of Grounds, etc., are illustrated. An extensive Compendium of Manufacturers' Announcements is also given, in which the most reliable and approved Building Materials, Goods, Machines, Tools, and Appliances are described and illustrated, with addresses of the makers, etc.

The fullness, richness, cheapness, and convenience of this work have won for it the =Largest Circulation= of any Architectural publication in the world.

MUNN & CO., Publishers,

361 Broadway, New York.

A Catalogue of valuable books on Architecture, Building, Carpentry, Masonry, Heating, Warming, Lighting, Ventilation, and all branches of industry pertaining to the art of Building, is supplied free of charge, sent to any address.

* * * * *

Building Plans and Specifications.

In connection with the publication of the BUILDING EDITION of the SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, Messrs. Munn & Co. furnish plans and specifications for buildings of every kind, including Churches, Schools, Stores, Dwellings, Carriage Houses, Barns, etc.

In this work they are assisted by able and experienced architects. Full plans, details, and specifications for the various buildings illustrated in this paper can be supplied.

Those who contemplate building, or who wish to alter, improve, extend, or add to existing buildings, whether wings, porches, bay windows, or attic rooms, are invited to communicate with the undersigned. Our work extends to all parts of the country. Estimates, plans, and drawings promptly prepared. Terms moderate. Address

MUNN & CO., 361 BROADWAY, NEW YORK.

* * * * *

THE

Scientific American Supplement.

PUBLISHED WEEKLY.

Terms of Subscription, $5 a year.

Sent by mail, postage prepaid, to subscribers in any part of the United States or Canada. Six dollars a year, sent, prepaid, to any foreign country.

All the back numbers of THE SUPPLEMENT, from the commencement, January 1, 1876, can be had. Price, 10 cents each.

All the back volumes of THE SUPPLEMENT can likewise be supplied. Two volumes are issued yearly. Price of each volume, $2.50 stitched in paper, or $3.50 bound in stiff covers.

COMBINED RATES.--One copy of SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN and one copy of SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN SUPPLEMENT, one year, postpaid, $7.00.

A liberal discount to booksellers, news agents, and canvassers.

MUNN & CO., Publishers,

361 Broadway, New York, N. Y.

* * * * *

Useful Engineering Books

Manufacturers, Agriculturists, Chemists, Engineers, Mechanics, Builders, men of leisure, and professional men, of all classes, need good books in the line of their respective callings. Our post office department permits the transmission of books through the mails at very small cost. A comprehensive catalogue of useful books by different authors, on more than fifty different subjects, has recently been published, for free circulation, at the office of this paper. Subjects classified with names of author. Persons desiring a copy have only to ask for it, and it will be mailed to them. Address,

MUNN & CO., 361 Broadway, New York.

* * * * *

PATENTS.

In connection with the =Scientific American=, Messrs. MUNN & CO. are solicitors of American and Foreign Patents, have had 42 years' experience, and now have the largest establishment in the world. Patents are obtained on the best terms.

A special notice is made in the =Scientific American= of all inventions patented through this Agency, with the name and residence of the Patentee. By the immense circulation thus given, public attention is directed to the merits of the new patent, and sales or introduction often easily effected.

Any person who has made a new discovery or invention can ascertain, free of charge, whether a patent can probably be obtained, by writing to MUNN & CO.

We also send free our Hand Book about the Patent Laws, Patents, Caveats, Trade Marks, their costs, and how procured. Address

MUNN & CO.,

361 Broadway, New York.

Branch Office, 622 and 624 F St., Washington, D. C.

* * * * *

Transcriber's Amendments

Transcriber's Note: Some illustrations may have been moved. We have rendered consistent on a per-word-pair basis the hyphenation or spacing of such pairs when repeated in the same grammatical context. The table of contents has been moved to the front.

Other changes are listed below. The listed source publication page number also applies in this reproduction except for the table of contents since it has been moved.

Page Change

10343 [Fig. 1 redrawn slightly to reduce the reader's confusion.]
10345 [NATURE.][Heading deleted.]
10345 12,600 lb. per square inch[(psi)].[also in following lines.]
10346 [First line of heading moved to footnote.]
10347 as much as [a] plank of the same size
10347 For these upper floors hard-wood[hardwood] plank,
10349 asserted pretty generally thoughout[throughout] the country
10349 employes[employees] will no longer be known as "gas house
10350 reappear in the little glow lamp[glow-lamp][multiple instances]
10351 through[though] I doubt whether it is visible
10351 due to the vacum[vacuum],
10351 and to the atonishment[astonishment] of my fellow
10352 the many disagreeable symptons[symptoms],
10352 [Part of Care of The Eyes header moved to footnote.]
10354 but on miscroscopical[microscopical] examination
10354 neigborhood[neighborhood] in which we live.
10355 It[Its] parallax, as determined by Sir R. S. Ball,
10355 The well known[well-known] double star 61 Cygni
10356 [Fig. 3: Illegible text re-composed.]
10358 [Advertisements header added.]
10358 [Table of contents moved to front of publication.]
10358 The One Hundred and Twenty Foot[Ton] Shears {Table of Contents}

* * * * *

Comments

Log in to leave a comment.

Scientific American Supplement, No. 648, June 2, 1888.Chapter XIII: TECHNOLOGY.--Future Prospects for Gas Companies.--By Mr (5)

0%34 min left in chapter