Skip to content

Chapter XIV (2)

Text size

The proportions of the mandible, as maybe judged from the table of measurements, are rather stout and the teeth are strong and numerous. There are evidences of 19 teeth preserved. The sutures separating the articular (_art_), angular (_ang_), surangular (_sa_), coronoid (_cor_), and the dentary (_d_) (fig. 22, F) are clear for at least the greater part of their length and they may be easily restored for the remainder of their course. The surangular is thus seen to rival the dentary in size and on it occurs the peculiar sculpturing which approximates so closely that on the skull of _Erpetosaurus tabulatus_ Cope. The presence of the long anterior tooth is strikingly characteristic of many Microsauria. It is well developed in _Sauropleura longidentata_ Moodie and _Sauropleura (Anisodexis) enchodus_ Cope. It is also present in well-developed form in the later labyrinthodonts. The teeth are all, with the exception of the fourth from the anterior end, rather short, curved, and sharply pointed, with an indication of longitudinal fluting. The arrangement of the mandibular elements recalls in a striking way the mandible of _Eryops megacephalus_ Cope as figured by Branson (49).

Measurements of the Mandible Provisionally Associated With Erpetosaurus tabulatus Cope.

(No. 8542 G, American Museum of Natural History.)

mm.
Length of mandible 32
Posterior width across surangular 6
Width of dentary 3
Width of jaw at tip 1.5
Length of one of the posterior teeth 1.25
Width across base of same tooth .50
Length of long anterior tooth 2
Width of same tooth at base .75

Another specimen of this same species is 8550 G, of the American Museum. Linton, Ohio, Coal Measures.

PALATE OF ERPETOSAURUS TABULATUS COPE.

Moodie, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XXVI, pp. 352-354, pl. lxi, fig.
2, 1909.

The specimen is half a cranium with its impression. It is referred to _Erpetosaurus_ on the basis of the sculpturing of the mandible and the posterior table of the skull. On the surangular there is seen the rugosity which is common to other members of the genus. The characters presented are those of _Erpetosaurus tabulatus_ Cope, but the reference is rather uncertain.

The specimen is unique among the known American material in showing the structure of the palate. Jaekel (347) has figured and described the palate of _Diceratosaurus punctolineatus_ Cope from the Linton beds. The present palate differs from that species only in the enlarged ectopterygoid and the smaller palatine.

The parasphenoid, in the present form, does not differ from that element in other Paleozoic Amphibia. Its form is slender, arising from an enlarged base and separating the pterygoids by its own width. The exoccipitals are probably represented in the specimen and they have been indicated in the drawing (fig. 22 C). They are rather large and extend some distance under the base of the skull to unite anteriorly with the pterygoids, a very unusual arrangement. The pterygoids are elongate elements and are bounded anteriorly by the vomer and laterally by the ectopterygoid. The vomer shows no evidence of being toothed, although it may have been so anteriorly. The same may also be said for the palatines. The relations of the ectopterygoids are rather unusual for the Amphibia, especially in the posterior extension of the element. The bone lies all along the side of the pterygoid and anteriorly projects forward between the pterygoid and the palatine. In this unusual posterior projection the ectopterygoid has almost obliterated the infratemporal foramen, which possibly may be still represented by the triangular space between the bases of the pterygoid and the ectopterygoid. The anterior palatine foramen (internal nares) lies between the anterior ends of the palatine and the vomer, its usual relations in the labyrinthodonts. The foramen may be recognized as the rounded depression slightly anterior to the palatine.

The mandible is rather heavy and is coarsely sculptured with radiating grooves and ridges. The character of the teeth can not be determined, save to say that they were present. The posterior end of the mandible projects somewhat beyond the quadrate angle of the skull.

The interest in the present specimen is heightened by the light it throws on the characters for the separation of the Amphibia and Reptilia. The wide separation of the pterygoids by the parasphenoid is an amphibian character of undoubted value. The reduction of the parasphenoid in this specimen is noteworthy.

Measurements of the Skull of Erpetosaurus tabulatus Cope.

(No. 8607 G, American Museum of Natural History.)

mm.
Length of skull in median line 45
Estimated posterior width of skull 50
Estimated width of parasphenoid 6
Width of pterygoid 5
Length of ectopterygoid 17
Posterior width of mandible 12

=Erpetosaurus minutus Moodie.=

Moodie, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., 37, pp. 21-23, pl. 8, fig. 1, 1909.

Type: Specimen No. 4545, U. S. National Museum.

Horizon and locality: Cannelton slates, Pennsylvania (Upper Freeport). (Plate 20 D.)

The specimen on which the species is based is composed of the greater portion of a small skull preserved in the hard shale from Cannelton, Pennsylvania, and was collected by Mr. R. D. Lacoe, of Pittston, Pennsylvania. The characters of the specimen had not previously been determined, since the museum label and number had partially obscured the snout of the skull. The skull is very small, but has the form assumed by other members of the genus. The specimen may belong to a young individual, but even though it does, it is, nevertheless, quite distinct from the other species of _Erpetosaurus_. At first sight the specimen looks like a broken scute of some larger form. Close inspection, however, revealed the two impressions representing the orbits, and a Zeiss binocular revealed the characters. The large size and anterior position of the orbits, the character of the sculpturing, the presence of the posterior table of the skull, as in _Erpetosaurus_ (_Tuditanus_) _tabulatus_ Cope, are the characters on which a specific diagnosis is possible. The specific characters which distinguish this form from _E. tabulatus_ Cope, its nearest ally, are the slight development of the posterior table, the more delicate form of the sculpturing, the more posterior position of the orbits, and the varying shape assumed by the parietals in the two species. Any one of these characters would be valid as a specific character.

The pineal eye is indistinct, but is observed to lie in the broken tract in the median line of the skull, in the middle of the portion posterior to the orbits. The interorbital space is equal to the width of the orbit. The orbits themselves are slightly oval and not round, as in the case of _E. tabulatus_ Cope.

The skull elements are sculptured with radiating grooves and ridges, and on the postparietals and tabulare the grooves take the form of pits in a row, which undoubtedly represent the occipital cross-commissure of the lateral-line system first observed in a microsaurian by Andrews (8) in the skull of _Ceraterpeton galvani_ Huxley. The supraorbital canal is represented by a slight elongate depression observable over each orbit and extending, in one case, for about 5 mm. The presence of the circular arrangement of the lateral-line canals in the jugal region is suggested by a depression on the posterior edge of the squamosal.

The portion of the skull anterior to the orbits is wanting, curiously enough, just as in _Erpetosaurus tabulatus_ Cope. In the remainder of the skull, the post-parietals, the tabulare, the parietals, the supratemporal, and a portion of the right frontal can be detected, although the boundaries of but three can be accurately defined. The depression bounding the anterior outline of the skull is taken to be the impress of the mandible, in which case this structure would be of some depth, as in the case of the mandible associated with _E. tabulatus_ Cope, described below.

This specimen is of interest in respect to the presence of the lateral-line canals, its small size, and its generic identity with forms from Ohio. There is still another form known from the Cannelton slates, described below as _Erpetosaurus (Tuditanus) sculptilis_ Moodie.

Measurements of the Type of Erpetosaurus minutus Moodie.

mm.
Length of skull 18
Posterior width of skull 17
Width of skull across orbits 14
Length of orbit 4.5
Width of orbit 3.5
Interorbital width 3.5

=Erpetosaurus sculptilis Moodie.=

Moodie, Jour. Geol., 17, No. 1, p. 61, figs. 11, 12, 1909 (_Tuditanus
sculptilis_).

Moodie, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XXVI, p. 347, 1909 (_Erpetosaurus
sculptilis_).

Moodie, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., 37, p. 22, 1909 (describes pectoral
girdle).

Type: Specimen No. 12,315, University of Chicago, Walker Museum.

Horizon and locality: Cannelton slates, Pennsylvania (Upper Freeport). (Plate 18.)

There is preserved in the collections of Walker Museum of the University of Chicago a small amphibian skull pressed flat on a slab of slate from Cannelton, Pennsylvania. It formed part of the Hall collection acquired by the University of Chicago in 1908.

The specimen presents only a portion of the skull and fragmentary pectoral plates. The skull is wider than long and the muzzle is broadly rounded. The orbits are narrow ovals and their posterior border falls on the transverse line dividing the skull equally. The interorbital width is slightly greater than the width of the orbits and about equal to their length. The posterior outline of the skull is somewhat truncate, as in _E. tabulatus_ Cope and other species of the genus. The distal extremities of the quadrates do not project as far backward as do the supraoccipitals. The skull roof is formed of the regular elements, except that a quadrate seems to be indicated by a scale of bone on the posterior angle. The nostrils are oval and the pineal opening is small.

The premaxillæ are apparently relatively large elements, though their boundaries are not definite. The nasal is of an oblong shape and borders the frontal anteriorly. The frontal forms the whole of the interior border of the orbit and borders the parietal broadly behind. The parietal is a large element and the pineal foramen is inclosed in the median suture about midway of the parietals. The postparietal is wider than long and with the tabulare forms the greater part of the posterior border of the skull. The prefrontal (plate 18, fig. 1) apparently forms the entire anterior border of the orbit and sends an acuminate projection to the side of it. The maxilla is excluded from the orbit and is an elongate element with sharp conical teeth, of which there are 4 preserved. These measure about 1 mm. in length. The jugal lies along the lateral border of the orbit and it is acuminate both anteriorly and posteriorly. It borders the supratemporal broadly. The postfrontal forms the greater part of the posterior boundary of the orbit. It is triangular and acuminate behind, and is bordered broadly by the parietal and supratemporal. The supratemporal is also triangular and it borders the parietal broadly. The squamosal is evidently the largest element in the skull and on its posterior corner there is a flake of bone which may represent the quadrate, though this is by no means certain. The quadrate has not been detected in any of the Carboniferous Microsauria so far studied. The tabulare is an elongate element in the transverse line of the skull. Its entire boundary is uncertain, though part of the sutures are present. The quadratojugal is elongate and lies posterior to the maxilla and with that element forms the lateral boundary of the skull.

The canals of the lateral-line system have not been detected on the skull. The sculpturing of the cranial elements consists of grooves and ridges which radiate from a center. They are more prominent on the parietals than elsewhere, although the other skull elements present a strong sculpturing.

There are also preserved on the slab of slate, about 10 mm. posterior to the skull, fragments of the pectoral plates, probably representing the clavicles and the interclavicle. They are so badly fractured that their form can not be determined. No limbs or vertebræ have been observed.

Measurements of the Type of Erpetosaurus sculptilis Moodie.

mm.
Length of skull in median line 20
Width of skull at posterior
border (estimated) 24
Diameter of orbit 3
Length of orbit 4
Interorbital space 4
Diameter of nostril - 1
Pineal foramen, diameter .50

Pectoral Girdle Provisionally Associated With Erpetosaurus sculptilis Moodie.

Moodie, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., 37, p. 22, 1909.

The present specimen is preserved on a block of slate from Cannelton, Pennsylvania. It is associated with the previously described _Erpetosaurus sculptilis_ Moodie on account of its size, the geological and geographical distribution, and the character of the sculpture. It may pertain to an unknown species. Other remains besides the 3 elements of the pectoral girdle are preserved on the block of slate, but they are, for the most part, too imperfectly preserved for recognition. Some of them are phalanges, and I believe I detect a scapula in the rounded curved plate lying near the right clavicle. The 3 pectoral elements, the interclavicle and the 2 clavicles, are preserved intact, with the ventral surface uppermost.

The specimen is particularly important in that it furnishes further evidence of the simplicity of the microsaurian pectoral girdle, which Jaekel regarded (347) as being extremely complex, in one species at least, _Diceratosaurus punctolineatus_ Cope. The 3 elements are broken, but either the elements or their impressions are present, so that identification is possible. The elements are sculptured with radiating grooves and ridges, as in so many of the Microsauria. The interclavicle is spatulate and bears a general resemblance to the same element of _Metoposaurus fraasi_ Lucas from the Triassic (383) of Arizona. The clavicles are triangular, with rounded angles and the hypothenuse on the interior border.

1 and 2. Photograph of the specimen of _Amphibamus grandiceps_
Cope, from the Mazon Creek shales. × 1.5. Original in possession
of Mr. L. E. Daniels, Rolling Prairie, Indiana.

3. Specimen of _Sauropleura (Colosteus) scutellata_ Newberry, from
the Linton Coal Measures. The species was the first known of the
Ohio Coal Measures Amphibia; at first ascribed by Newberry to the
fishes, but later correctly identified by Cope. × 1. Original in
American Museum of Natural History.

4. The type of _Diceratosaurus (Ceraterpeton) punctolineatus_ Cope,
from the Linton Coal Measures. × 1. Original in American Museum
of Natural History.

]

Measurements of Pectoral Girdle of Specimen No. 4539, U. S. National Museum.

mm.
Width across the entire girdle 17
Length of interclavicle 15
Width of interclavicle 10
Length of clavicle 11
Width of clavicle, maximum 6

=Erpetosaurus acutirostris Moodie.=

Moodie, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XXVI, pp. 349-351, pl. lxi, fig.
1, 1909.

Type: Specimen No. 8598 G, American Museum of Natural History.

Horizon and locality: Linton, Ohio, Coal Measures.

The present species adds another form to the diversity of structure presented by the Carboniferous Microsauria. It is closely allied to _Erpetosaurus_ (_Tuditanus_) _obtusus_ Cope, from the same beds (Linton, Ohio), but differs from it especially in the position and shape of the orbits and the acute form of the skull. Other characters which amount almost to generic significance are found in the posterior prolongation of the frontal and in the triangular form of the skull. Only the skull of the animal is preserved. The character which is common to all members of the genus _Erpetosaurus_, the cranial rugosity, is present in this species on the squamosal and supratemporal. This character alone would not, however, suffice to separate the form generically, but the general morphology and arrangement of the cranial elements is such that reference to any other genus save Erpetosaurus would not be possible.

The skull of _E. acutirostris_ takes the form of a rounded triangle. Its base is some 50 mm. in extent, and this width gradually narrows to 31 mm. across the orbits and still more towards the snout. The form of the skull is not widely different from that of the type species, _E. radiatus_ Cope, but the differences are sufficiently apparent.

Nearly all the elements of the cranium can be detected (fig. 22, D). The bony portion of the cranium has nearly all been lost, leaving only the impression; and the matrix in which the skull was embedded has been forced up into the sutures between the cranial elements, thus forming ragged ridges where the bones of the skull joined.

The position of the nostrils can not be determined accurately. The orbits are placed well forward, a character common to several species of the genus. The interorbital space is equal to the long diameter of the eye. The orbits are separated by narrow prolongations of the postfrontals and by the anterior portion of the frontals. The frontals are remarkable in their great backward extension. In _E. obtusus_ the frontals are nearly confined to the interorbital space. The parietals, which, on the median suture, inclose the parietal foramen, lie well posterior, and the parietals and the tabulare are small. A portion of the sculpturing of these elements has been preserved and it is seen to be made up of pits and elevations much as we find in the skull of _Saurerpeton latithorax_ Cope. The left squamosal also shows sculpturing, which here tends to take the form of grooves and ridges, and also of pits and elevations. It is quite probable that the anterior portion of the skull was ornamented with grooves and ridges and undoubtedly the lateral-line canals were well developed. The postfrontals and the postorbitals are both large and elongated. The postorbital is especially large. The supratemporal apparently separates the tabulare and the squamosal in their posterior extremities. The squamosal projects posteriorly to the tabulare and apparently even goes beyond the limits of the exoccipital. The outlines of the jugal are fairly definite, as are also the limits of the maxilla.

Measurements of the Type of the Skull of Erpetosaurus acutirostris Moodie.

mm.
Length of skull 50
Interorbital space 9
Width of orbit 7
Length of orbit 10
Width across orbits 31
Posterior width of skull 50
Diameter of pineal foramen 1
Length from tip of snout to
posterior angle of skull 65

An additional specimen shows that the skull, of which the anterior half is preserved, is practically of the same size as the type and shows much the same characters, though more extensively. The sculpture of the squamosal region is not confined to that portion of the skull, but extends throughout the cranial elements, apparently including the premaxillæ.

The sutures, which are clearly distinct, are of the same type as has been described for the type specimen. Perhaps one of the most interesting characters discovered on the present specimen is that of the greater part of the left supraorbital lateral-line canal, which is exhibited as a rather deep and broad canal running in a slight curve across the lower edges of the postorbital and the parietals and partly cutting the jugal.

On the left of the fossil, as it is preserved, there is an indistinct impression of the clavicle, with the sculpture in radiating lines from the apex as a center, such as have been found in other species of the Tuditanidæ.

Measurements of Additional Specimen.

(No. 8607, American Museum of Natural History.)

mm.
Length of skull as preserved 40
Anterior width across orbital region 22
Greatest width of the skull 33
Length of clavicle 18
Greatest width of clavicle 9

Still a third specimen of this species is possibly represented by a nearly complete skull of a small individual which exposes the mandible and the ventral portion of the skull. The remains are crushed flat, though not at all distorted. It is quite possible that the present specimen represents a distinct species, but only a small portion of the dorsum is present and the shape of the cranium is indistinct, so it is retained in this species. The portion of the skull shows the sculpture to be quite similar to that of _Erpetosaurus acutirostris_, so far as the species is known; and the skull apparently tapers to a point anteriorly. It may be a dwarfed or immature form. The sculpturing of the jaw is such as we would expect of this species.

The specimen is about half the size of the type. The palate of the skull is well preserved and is extremely interesting. The sutures separating the various palatal elements are not distinct. The parasphenoid is especially large and the exoccipitals are partly ossified, if we may judge by the projecting condyles. Anteriorly the parasphenoid contracts and then expands and on each side of the expanded part lie fragments of the palatines. To the right of the posterior end of the parasphenoid lies a portion of the dorsal element showing the cranial sculpture.

The left mandible is somewhat displaced to the right of the skull, and crushed and weathered to such an extent that the sutures are entirely obliterated. There are 3 teeth, with indications of others. They are typically pleurodont and sharp and slender. The mandible tapers somewhat anteriorly and at the tip bears an elongate enlarged tooth.

Measurements of the Third Specimen of Erpetosaurus acutirostris Moodie in the American Museum of Natural History.

mm.
Length of skull, as preserved 25
Posterior width of skull 15
Anterior width of skull 10
Width across occipital condyles 4
Length of mandible 25
Anterior width of mandible 2
Length of large tooth 1

=Erpetosaurus tuberculatus Moodie.=

Moodie, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XXVI, pp. 348-349, pl. lviii,
1909.

Type: Specimen Nos. 8693 G and 8610 G, American Museum of Natural History.

Horizon and locality: Linton, Ohio, Coal Measures.

This species is based on a fragmentary cranium (plate 26, fig. 1) consisting of the posterior part of the right side of the skull. Its association in the genus is solely on the character of the sculpturing of the cranial elements. It is most closely related, in the characters preserved, to the form described by Cope as _Tuditanus radiatus_, from which it differs especially in the character of the sculpture and in the position of the orbits, as well as the arrangement and size of the various cranial elements, so far as these elements can be detected in the present specimen. In _Erpetosaurus radiatus_ the skull is sculptured by radiating grooves and ridges which did not arise from a definite center. In _E. tuberculatus_ this center of radiation is marked by an elevation or tubercle on each cranial element exposed, from which the grooves and ridges radiate outward. These tubercles have an elevation of 4 mm. above the cranial element proper. The orbit is located near the median line of the skull, so far as can be determined. In _E. radiatus_ Cope the orbits are located well forward. In that species also the postparietal is smaller than in the present species and the squamosal is longer and more slender. (Plate 25, fig. 1.)

The fragment of a skull on which the above comparison has been made consists of the right postparietal, a portion of the tabulare, the parietal, the frontal, and a portion of the squamosal. The other elements are not clear. The elements in the median line are elongate, as in _Erpetosaurus radiatus_. The pineal foramen is located well back on the median line and lies posterior to two-thirds of the length of the parietals. The sutures separating the frontal and parietal elements from each other in the median line are of the zigzag form so characteristic of the labyrinthodonts.

Measurements of the Type of Erpetosaurus tuberculatus Moodie.

mm.
Length of portion of skull preserved 52
Width across tabulare (estimated) 60
Length of parietal 15
Maximum width of parietal 11
Length of frontal 22
Width of frontal 12

=Genus ODONTERPETON Moodie.=

Moodie, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., 37, p. 19, 1909.

Type: _Odonterpeton triangularis_ Moodie.

The generic characters may be found in the triangular shape of the skull, the large size of the teeth, the shape of the vertebræ, the small size of the orbits, and their anterior position as shown in the type specimen (fig. 22, E). The name of the genus is derived from the remarkable size of the teeth as compared with the size of the skull.

=Odonterpeton triangularis Moodie.=

Moodie, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., 37, p. 19, pl. 6, fig. 3, 1909.

Type: Specimen No. 4465, U. S. National Museum.

Horizon and locality: Linton, Ohio, Coal Measures.

The specimen described under the above name is a representative of the smallest species of the Microsauria so far described from North America. _Orthocosta microscopica_ Fritsch, from the Carboniferous of Bohemia, is a rival of the present form in size, but the form described by Fritsch is an entirely different animal and was formerly included among the so-called Aistopoda, which are regarded by the writer as merely specialized microsaurians. The present form shows clear affinities with the Microsauria.

As may be seen by referring to the list of measurements, the skull of this form measures only 6.5 mm. in length. The form may possibly be larval, though I do not think so, if I may judge from the well-developed condition of the skull bones and the complete ossification of the vertebræ. The sides of the skull are equal and the occiput is a straight table, so that the skull forms almost an exact equilateral triangle. The orbits are very small and are placed well forward. The interorbital space is four times that of the diameter of the orbit, a very unusual character and in itself worthy of ranking as a generic character. The median suture of the skull is zigzag and incloses the minute parietal foramen near the posterior end of the skull. The relations of the elements of the skull, with the exceptions of those of the frontals and parietals, can not be determined with accuracy, although there are here and there indications of sutures. The characters of the cranial elements, so far as they can be determined, are those of the family Tuditanidæ, and the form may, for the present, be regarded as a member of that group. The teeth are very long, slender, and sharp, and are placed close together. There is no indication of fluting on the teeth. They are slightly curved inward.

There are 13 vertebræ present. The centra are hour-glass shaped, and are apparently phyllospondylous, with the notochord largely persistent. The vertebral centra are unusually long and slender, with the ends rounded. The humerus of the right side is preserved. It is a long, slender bone with expanded extremities. There is no evidence of abdominal armature nor of ribs (fig. 22, E).

The discovery of this form in the Linton deposits is of considerable interest in that it indicates a wide range in size and character of the fauna of the time. The forms now known from the Linton beds range from Odonterpeton, which possibly had a total length of 2 inches in life, to the form designated _Macrerpeton huxleyi_ Cope, with a skull of at least 8 inches in length and whose body may have attained a length of some feet. The large rib described below undoubtedly indicates a large form of the ancient Amphibia from Linton, as do also the vertebræ described by Marsh in 1863 from Nova Scotia.

Measurements of the Type.

mm.
Length of animal, as preserved 18
Length of skull 6.5
Posterior width of skull 5.5
Length of side of skull 6.5
Diameter of orbit 65
Interorbital width 2
Length of tooth 0.25
Length of vertebra 1.45
Width of vertebra 35
Length of humerus 2.25
Distal width of humerus 35

Comments

Log in to leave a comment.

The Coal Measures Amphibia of North AmericaChapter XIV (2)

0%18 min left in chapter