Chapter XXXV: Appendix: I (3)

Medina Rico, his visitation in Cartagena, 485
transferred to Mexico, 488
his Mexican visitation, 230
his arbitrary action, 255
on persecution of Palafox, 258
tries case of Juan de la Camara, 261

Melgarejo, Luisa, case of, 400

Melgarejo, Rodrigo Ortiz, case of, 394

_Membretes_, 228

Mendoza, Bp. of Popayan, 473

Mercader, Benito, visitor of Sicily, 19

Mercantile cases exempted from _fuero_, 41, 43

Merchants, heretic, residence of, 136

Messina receives the Inq., 17

Mexico, growth of the Church, 193
sanbenitos in cathedral, 196
apprehension of Protestants, 200
(_See_ Inq. of Mexico).

Mier, Gómez de, inqr. of Cartagena, 489, 490, 491

Mier Noriega y Guerra, case of, 297

Milan. _See_ Inq. of Milan.

Military service of officials, 263, 357

Miró, Estevan, Governor of Louisiana, 459

Mission from Naples to Ferdinand, 60
to Charles V, 74, 76

Missionaries to West Indies, 192
character of, in Colonies, 319

Missions, unsuccess of, 514, 515

Modena, Bp. of, inqr. in Milan, 121

Moles, Antonio, as confiscator, 84

Molinism in Peru, 400

Moncada, Hugo de, Viceroy of Sicily, 14

Monge, D. Miguel, his book on Inq., 41

Monox, Edward, case of, 171

Montalto, Waldenses of, 81, 82

Monterey, Viceroy, defends the exequatur, 95

Monterey, Viceroy, warned to favor Inq., 374

Montesalto, Duchess of, 85

Montesclaros, Viceroy, complains of Inq., 380

Montoro, Bp., appointed inqr. of Sicily, 6
of Naples, 57, 58

Montúfar, Abp., as inqr., 197
his censorship, 264

Moorish slaves, cases of, 144, 145, 159
forbidden to go to colonies, 194

Morals, censorship of, 446, 471

Morales, Padre, excites revolt, 308

Morejon, Catalina, 356

Morelos, José María, case of, 292

Moreno y Escandon, his report, 513

Moriscos in Canaries, 144, 145, 147, 160

Mormile, Cesare, 73, 74

Moro sailors, their pagan rites, 305

Mota, David de la, 469

Moya de Contreras, inqr. of Mexico, 200, 206

Moyen, François, case of, 439

Multiplicity of jurisdictions, 511

Múñoz, Diego, his censorship, 266

Murga, Bp. of Canaries, 146, 184

Murga, Governor of Cartagena, 476

Murgier, Jean Marie, case of, 272

Muros, Bp. of Canaries, as inqr., 140

Mussumelli, Count, case of, 29

Mutineers, naval, in Vera Cruz, 268

Mutis, José Celestino, case of, 471

Mystic impostors in Mexico, 235
in Peru, 396

Naples, its conquest by Ferdinand, 53
its municipal organization, 54
tumult of 1547, 72
English girl abducted in 1746, 106
(_See_ Inquisition of Naples).

Nava, Antonio, case of, 104

Negro slaves in Canaries, 148, 159

New Christians banished from Naples, 62, 64
forbidden to leave Canaries, 142
not allowed in the Colonies, 193, 419

New Granada, the earliest Spanish settlement, 453
description of its people, 461
revolution of 1810, 506
its condition in 1772, 513
(_See_ Inquisition of New Granada).

New Mexico, Governor of, arrested, 256

Nicholas V sends inqr. to Naples, 49

Nobles as familiars, 28, 30, 32, 42

_Nuevo Reino de Granada_, 453

Number of Sicilian Jews, 3
of familiars allowed, 13
in Sicily, 28, 31
in Sardinia, 117
in Canaries, 146

Number of familiars in Mexico, 247, 536
in Peru, 330
in New Granada, 468

Oath of obedience to Inq., 11, 202,534
of independence in New Granada, 507

Oaxaca, Bp. of, penances Indians, 211

Obregon, Diego de, receiver of Sicily, 6, 9, 12

Occult arts, Edict of Faith against, 391

Ochino, Bernardino, 69, 70

Officials, crimes of, 14
engage in trade, 21
their exemptions, 22, 380
their _fuero_, 22, 24, 245
hostility towards them, 23, 26
their excepted crimes, 31, 247, 330
their abuses in Naples, 100
in the Colonies, 251, 498
multiplication in Sardinia, 117, 119
royal safeguard for, 202
their immunities, 246
subordinated to State, 275
not to receive commissions, 521
not to receive presents, 523

Offices, traffic in, 372

Olivares, Viceroy, rebukes the Inq., 33

Olivitos, Angela, case of, 400

_Onza_ of Sicily, 5

Opinions, political, prosecution for, 273

Orders, Religious, laxity in, 244, 515
complain of Mañozca, 474

Ordóñez, Comr., arrests governor, 256

Ordóñez appointed inqr. of Lima, 360
secures a legacy, 344
his greed, 362
made Abp. of Santafé, 363
on solicitation, 394

Organization of Mexican Inq., 204, 289
of Lima Inq., 350, 451
of city of Naples, 54

Ortiz, Juan, inqr. of Cartagena, 479, 482, 486, 487

Ortíz, Tomas, as inqr., 196

Osuna, Viceroy, his obsequiousness, 93

_Ottine_ of Naples, 55

Ovalle, Manuel de, S. J., 407, 410

Oviedo, Rodrigo de, 479, 484, 486, 487

Ozaeta, Pablo de, inqr. of Cartagena, 499, 500

Pablo de Santa Maria, 423
Pact with demon, 166

Padilla, José de, inqr. of Cartagena, 489, 490, 491

Padilla, Luis de, inqr. of Canaries, 144

Palacios, Andrés, 57, 60, 63

Palafox, Bp. Juan de, his persecution, 257
his _Ejercicios devotos_ suppressed, 471

Palermo, rising in 1511, 11
complaints of Inq., 13
rising in 1516, 15
auto de fe of 1724, 40

Panamá, alguazil in, 331
under Cartagena tribunal, 457

Pantelaria, inqr. appointed for, 1

Pantolosa the Neapolitan banker, 50

Panza, commissioner, 82, 86

Paolo d’Arezzo, mission to Philip II, 86, 525

Paolo Sarpi, on trade with heretics, 137

Papal Inq. in Naples controlled by viceroy, 56

Paraguay, Jesuits in, 258

Parliament of Naples in 1536, 66
Sicilian, complaints of, 13, 21, 22, 26

Pascale, Giovan Luigi, burnt, 80

Pastry, sacred heads in, 266

Paternina, Commissioner of Philippines, 311

Paul III organizes Roman Inq., 70
his relations with Naples, 76
stimulates Inq. of Sardinia, 117
stimulates persecution in Milan, 121
forbids New Christians to go to America, 194
on capacity of Indians, 210

Paul IV introduces Roman Inq. in Naples, 78
restores confiscation, 79
coerces Abp. of Sassari, 117
degrades Bp. of Brescia, 122
stimulates persecution in Milan, 123

Paul V intervenes in Sardinia, 118

Pay-roll of Neapolitan Inq., 57
of Sardinian, 114
of Mexican, 289
of Peruvian, 350, 451

Payta, English descent on, 375

Pearls, confiscated, sent to Ferdinand, 112

Peculation in Inq. of Sicily, 19, 521
in Inq. of Peru, 340, 351
in Inq. of Cartagena, 487

Pedro de Córdova, a missionary, 192, 195

Pelayo, Nofre, case of, 51

Penitents, labor required of, 19
their transportation, 234, 235
pelting of, prohibited, 432, 438

Peña, Antonio de la, inqr. of Sicily, 2

Peñaranda, Viceroy, expels Piazza, 99

Peralta, inqr. of Mexico, 207, 208

Peralta, Governor, his arrest, 256

Pereira Castro, inqr. of Cartagena, 483, 485, 486, 487, 488

Pereyns, Simon, case of, 198

Pérez, Manuel Bautista, case of, 431

Peru, episcopal inq. in, 197, 321
royal rebuke of inqrs., 251
irreverent use of crosses, 266
its condition in 16th century, 319
(_See_ Inquisition of Peru).

Pestilence, atonement for, 143

Petronila de San Esteban, a beata, 163

Petronio, Bp., calls himself inqr., 94

_Peyote_, use of, in Mexico, 228

Philip II orders officials protected, 23
restores the _fuero_, 25
humiliates Viceroy Terranova, 25
orders the Inq. aided, 26
rebukes Viceroy Alba, 29
makes concession to justice, 30
his assurance to Naples, 86, 525
asks aid for Sardinian Inq., 116
proposes Spanish Inq. for Milan, 125
abandons the project, 128, 529
sustains Inq. of Canaries, 180
zeal for the faith in the New World, 191
forbids New Christians access to colonies, 194
regulates familiars in colonies, 197, 247, 536
fears Protestantism in Colonies, 200
founds Inq. in Mexico, 203
exempts Indians from Inq., 210
his grant to Inq. of Mexico, 212
suppresses episcopal Inq. in Philippines, 301
founds Inq. of Peru, 326
royal protection for officials, 374
refuses tribunal to New Granada, 456

Philip III, his instructions for Sicily, 33
his circular letter to viceroys, 35
efforts to learn receipts, 216, 344
issues Concordia of 1610, 251
regulates competencias, 253
excludes Bibles from colonies, 267
royal protection for officials, 374
his subvention for Cartagena tribunal, 460, 500

Philip IV orders the _via ordinaria_, 99
enforces the exequatur, 95
subjects inqrs. to _alcavala_, 215
claims return of subvention, 220
demands accounts from tribunals, 216, 221, 345, 348
his gratification at autos, 233, 240
regulates competencias, 253
issues Concordia of 1633, 254
on Philippine commissioners, 310
proposes subdivision of Peru, 338
on secret prison of Cartagena, 480
on visitation of Martin Real, 481, 484

Philip V abandons Naples, 102
orders foreigners expelled, 176
rebukes Inq. of Canaries, 187

represses the Lima Inq., 384

Philippines, canonries in, 217
solicitation in, 243, 302
(_See_ Inq. of Philippines).

Phillips, Miles, his account of auto of 1574, 205

Piazza, Bp., establishes a tribunal, 98
is expelled, 99

_Piazze_ of Naples, 54

Piélago, secretary, as office broker, 372

Pimienta, Governor of Cartagena, 499

Pinto, Paz, case of, 466

Piracy in Canaries, 168

Pius IV opposes Spanish Inq., 86
agrees to it, for Milan, 125

Pius V objects to exequatur, 90
as inqr. of Como, 122
his decree as to Inq., 132, 531
proposes Spanish Inq. for Venice, 132
his quarrel with Mantua, 133
his advice as to the Indies, 199

Pizarro, María, case of, 396

Placido di Sangro sent to Charles V, 74, 76, 77

Plata, Juan, case of, 242

Poblete, José Millan de, 313, 316

Pointis, Baron de, captures Cartagena, 467

Poisonings in Cartagena, 486

Political functions of Canary tribunal, 190
of Mexican tribunal, 272, 275

Ponte y Andrade, inqr. of Lima, 365

Popular sovereignty a heresy, 275

Portorubio, Bp. of Malta, as inqr., 46

Portuguese Judaizers, 229
complaints in Peru of, 337, 341, 421
ordered to leave Peru, 433
prosecuted in New Granada, 466

Poverty of Mexican Inq., 213

Prado sent as visitador to Peru, 357
on commissioners, 335
his charges against Ulloa, 358
Ulloa’s charges against him, 359
his proposed reforms, 360
prosecutes viceroy, 376

Pragmatic sanction of 1732, 42

Pralboino, Claudio, escapes burning, 123

Prebends for colonial tribunals, 216, 347, 501, 503, 504, 508

Precautions against heretics in Lombardy, 135, 530

Precedence in competencias, 253, 267
in bull-fights, 254

Pre-emption forbidden, 251, 254

Printing-office, none in Cartagena, 470

Prison, secret, in Canaries, 157, 158
confinement in, 480
penitential, in Mexico, 214

Prisoners, cost of maintenance, 353
care for them, 519, 521

Prisoners, English, claimed by Inq., 357
of war, trials of, in Peru, 414
their rights respected, 418

Privileges of officials in Sicily, 10
in the colonies, 245

Procedure of Roman Inq., 97
of episcopal Inq., 105

Profits of jurisdiction, 28

Prohibited books, strictness as to, 274
given to Archbishop, 289
in Philippines, 306

Propagandism, Protestant, dread of, 200

Property, efforts to conceal, 427

Propositions, heretical, 392, 441, 455, 470

Protestantism, dread of, 200

Protestants, in Canaries, 167, 175
in Mexico, 198, 205, 207, 208, 226
in Peru, 321, 325
in New Granada, 466

Punishment, capricious, in Lima, 437

Purchase of offices, 372

Quakeresses in Maltese Inq., 47

Quarantine against heretics in
Lombardy, 530

Quarrels with bishops, 35, 182, 257, 476, 491
of inqrs., 355, 359, 363, 366, 479, 485, 488, 490
with authorities, 373, 473, 484, 488
financial, in Mexico, 212, 217

_Quebrantamientos de escrituras de juego_, 349

Queipo, Bp. of Mechoacan, 275, 290

_Quemadero_ in Mexico, 206

Querétaro, censorship in, 266

Quevedo, Juan, Bp. of Cuba, 195

Quicksilver, distribution of, 255

Quietism of Juan de Valdés, 68

Quietists in Sardinia, 119
in Peru, 406, 410

Quiñones, Dr., his confiscation, 343

Quiroga, Inq.-genl., his letter to Bp. Vera, 181

Quirós, Bernardo de, Inqr. of Cartagena, 489, 490, 491

Quito, Bp. Peña of, his legacy, 344

Ranzano, Bp., inqr. of Sicily, 2

Real, Martin, his visitation, 348, 481, 483

Real estate, alienations of, 14

_Rebeldía_, 182

Rebiba, Scipione, in Naples, 78

Recalde, Fray Joseph, case of, 449

Receipts, statements of, refused, 216, 219, 345, 504

Receivership, dangers of, 111, 114

Reconciliation entails confiscation, 421

Records of the tribunals, 190, 288, 298, 317, 320

Recruits pretending Catholicism, 271

Reforms attempted in Sicily, 13, 18, 518
proposed, in Peru, 360

Refugees from Sicily in Naples, 64, 65

Reggio, persecution in, 86
arrests by Sicilian Inq., 89

Registers, parish, falsified, 434
imperfect, 514

Relaxations in Canaries, 154

Remittances from Mexico, 219, 221, 224, 225

Renegades in Canaries, 160

_Repartimientos_ of Indians, 215

Requisitions by Inq., 251, 252, 254

Resistance to sanbenitos, 24

Revolution, French, influence of, 272

Revolution of Mexico, its ferocity, 281
of New Granada, 506

Reyes, Luisa de los, a _beata_, 304

Ribagorza, Viceroy, controls papal Inq., 56, 524

Ribera, Teodoro de, case of, 392

Riciullo, Bp., acts as inqr., 96

Rio de Janeiro, Portuguese arrested, 421

Rising of 1516 in Palermo, 15
of 1547, in Naples, 72

Rivas, Gerónimo, case of, 375

Roda, Giacomo, inqr. of Sicily, 2

Rodríguez, Juan, his complaint, 266

Rodríguez, Rafael Gil, case of, 273

Roelas, Alonso de las, case of, 161

Rojas, José Ant., sentenced for liberalism, 273

Rome, citations to, 89
prisoners sent there, 79
burnings in, 80, 88, 135

Romero, the sisters, _embusteras_, 235, 239

Romo, Bartolo, alcaide, 367

Romualdo, Fra, burnt in 1724, 40

Safeguard, royal, for officials, 202

Sagro Monte della Pietà in Naples, 67

Sailors, foreign, prosecution of, 169

_Sala reflexa_, 387

Salaries of Sicilian tribunal, 6, 9
of Sardinian tribunal, 109
regulated by confiscations, 114, 528
for Inq. of Naples, 57
in Mexico, 212, 289
in Peru, 350, 451

Salas y Pedroso, inqr. of Cartagena, 488, 489

Salar, Bp. of Manila, his Inq., 299

Salazar, Luis Rúiz de, case of, 152

Salcedo, Governor of Philippines, his imprisonment, 311

Salcedo, inqr. of Cartagena, 460, 476

Salerno, Prince of, sent to Charles V, 74

Saldaña, Fray Juan de, case of, 242

Salice, Hercole, a heretic, 129

Salinas, Dr., 360, 376, 379

Salinas, Gregorio de, comr. in Vera Cruz, 268

Sanbenitos, opposition to, in Sicily, 15, 24, 523
for Waldenses, 83
discarded from churches in Canaries, 188
burnt, 189
in Mexican cathedral, 196, 226
use made of them, 289
of Morelos, 296
of prisoners of war, 417

Sánchez, Miguel, case of, 113

Sanders, John, case of, 145, 168

San Lorenzo, Tribunale de, 55

San Sisto, Waldenses of, 81, 82, 83

Santa Clara, nuns of, at Cartagena, 491, 493

Santa Cruz, Domingo de, case of, 110

Santa Marta, Diego de, case of, 166

Santa Marta, see of, 453
bishop of, 492, 493, 494

Santangel, Luis de, refuses Pantolosa’s bills, 51

Santiago, commissioner of Chile, 346

Santo Domingo, subject to Lima, 333
to Cartagena, 457
Jews allowed in, 469

St. Augustine, attempts to found Inq. there, 458

St. John, Order of, in Malta, 45

Sardinia. _See_ Inq. of Sardinia.

Sartolo, Bernardo, S. J., 405

Savoy, Sicilian Inq. under, 40
obtains Sardinia, 119

Scrutinium Scripturarum, 423

Scourging in Mexico, 206
in Peru, 431, 438

Sebastian, Inqr., attacked, 23
his activity, 26

Secretaries of Suprema, payments to, 350

Secular jurisdiction over heresy in Naples, 56, 66, 524

Sedella, Ant. de, inqr. of Louisiana, 459

_Seggi_ of Naples, 54

Sentence of Waldenses, 83
of Morelos, 298
of François Moyen, 443

Sentences not enforced, 20, 520

Sequestrations in Mexico, 223
in Peru, 348, 429
commerce destroyed by, 428
not applied by commissioners, 301

Sequestrations not applicable to prisoners of war, 417

Servants of officials, their privileges, 31, 245, 474

Sessa, Duke of, Governor of Milan, 127, 128, 129

Seville, composition of, 193
its jurisdiction over Canaries, 141

Sgalambro, Dr., inqr. of Sicily, 6, 8

Shaw, Robert, case of, 413

Sheep given to a Jew, 143

Ships, detention of, 252, 254, 333

Sickness, efforts to convert in, 175

Sinaloa, governor of, excommunicated, 249

Sixtus IV asks Inq. for Sicily, 1

Sixtus V places a commissioner in Naples, 92

Slavery, escape from, is apostasy, 149

Slaves, Christian, sold by Inq., 19, 520
in Canaries, 144, 148, 149, 152, 159
of officials, their immunity, 251, 474
their exemption abrogated, 388
false witness of, 437
negro, in New Granada, 462

Snuff-boxes, censorship of, 178

Sobranis, Ana de, a beata, 183

Socaya, inqr. of Cartagena, 483

Solicitation in Canaries, 163
in Mexico, 227, 228, 241, 271
in Philippines, 302
in Peru, 344, 393

Solis, José, case of, 407, 410

Soranzo Bp. of Brescia, case of, 122

Sorcery in Naples, 101
in Canaries, 147, 148, 165
in Mexico, 206, 228
in Peru, 391, 439
in New Granada, 462

Soto, Juan de, case of, 160

Spinelli, Abp., his Inq., 104
forced to resign, 107

Spinello, lord of La Guardia, 80, 85

Stevenson, W. B., 373, 447

Stomeo, Giantonio, case of, 94

Stoning penitents prohibited, 432, 438

Suárez de Figueroa, inqr. of Cartagena, 495, 498

Subdivision of Peru proposed, 337

Subsidy, Sicilian, to Charles V, 22

Subvention, royal, of Mexican tribunal, 212, 216, 218, 220, 222
of Lima tribunal, 342, 344, 347
of Cartagena tribunal, 500, 501, 502

_Sueldo_, value of, 6

Superstitions in New Granada, 462

Superunda, Viceroy of Peru, 370, 387

Suppression of Sicilian Inq., 43
of Neapolitan, 107
of Sardinian, 119
of Milanese, 137

Suppression of Canary Inq., 189
of Mexican, 270, 288, 298
of Peruvian, 354, 447
of New Granadan, 507, 510

Suprema, its large receipts from Mexico, 219
its duplicity and concealment, 219, 221, 223, 224, 348
on Salcedo’s arrest, 315
relations with colonial tribunals, 331
urges subdivision of Peru, 337
payments to its secretaries, 350
contributions to, from Cartagena, 502 505
its demands for remittances, 513

Swiss, their relations with Milan, 129

Symbols, sacred, prohibited, 265

Syndics, Jesuit, in solicitation, 303

Syracuse, Bp. of, his quarrel with Inq., 36

Tabaloro, Carlo, case of, 38

Tagal book, heresy in, 307

Tanner, John, case of, 173

Tanucci, Regent of Naples, 107

Tarragona, Abp. of, his bills of exchange, 51

Tattooing, censorship of, 266

Taxation, exemption from, in Mexico, 215

Tello de Sandoval, inqr. of Mexico, 197

Tenerife, foreigners in, 172, 175

Terracina, Domenico, 72

Terranova, Duke of, case of, 25

Terror aroused by Inq., 98

Tezcoco, cacique of, burnt, 196

Thimbles, crosses on, erased, 266

Toledo, Pedro de, Viceroy of Naples, 66
urges introduction of Inq., 70
bombards the city, 73
his vindictive triumph, 76

Toledo, Viceroy of Peru, on condition of colony, 319
gets rid of Aguirre, 323
controls royal subvention, 342
curbs the Inq., 374

Toleration proclaimed in Colombia, 510

Tormentors, 448

Toro, Pedro de, case of, 396, 398

Torquemada appoints inqr. for Sicily, 2

Torres, Comr. of Popayan, 454

Torture administered by physician, 142
severity of, in Lima, 429
implements of, 447

Trade forbidden to officials, 251, 254
with heretics creates suspicion, 130, 136, 137
danger of, in Canaries, 168

Traffic in offices, 372

Transportation of penitents, 234, 235

Travel in heretic lands, licence for, 130, 136, 137

Treaty of 1604 with England, 171

Trent, Council of, opposes Spanish Inq., 127
on episcopal power over heresy, 211

Treviño, Tomás, his martyrdom, 233

Treviso, licences to travel required, 136

Tribaldos, Bart., first Canary inqr., 140

Tucuman, its conquest by Aguirre, 322
solicitation in, 393, 394, 395

Tuscany, arrests require assent of ruler, 137

Tumult of 1516 in Palermo, 15
of 1547 in Naples, 72

Ubau, Pedro, case of, 353, 407, 410

Ulloa, Ant. Gut., inqr. of Peru, 355
complaints against him, 356
Prado’s charges, 358
his sentence, 360
visits his district, 361
his dismissal and death, 362
prosecutes viceroy, 376, 544

Ulloa, Antonio de, on Peruvian clergy, 514

Ulloa, Francisco de, S. J., case of, 406, 410

Ulloa, Juan Fran, de, case of, 367

Ulloa, Juan de, case of, 393

Unda, Diego de, inqr. of Peru, 352
his property sequestrated, 352
his confiscated jewels, 354
his scandals, 366
his arrest, 368
his release and death, 370
condemns Quietists, 410

Universities, compulsory degrees of, 252

University of Lima favors suppression, 449

Unnatural crime, 244

Urban VII suppresses canonries in Peru, 346

Urban VIII defends Fra Petronio, 95
grants prebends to colonial tribunals, 216

Uriarte, Juan de, secretary, 479, 482, 486, 487, 488

Utrecht, treaty of, 40

Uzstáriz, Commissioner, his zeal, 305

Valera, Francisco, inqr. of Cartagena, 491
his quarrel with Bp. Benavides, 492
is transferred to Lima, 495
his actions condemned, 365, 498
insists on royal subvention, 503, 504
as inqr. of Lima, 364
tries Angela Carranza, 400, 404
his jubilation, 365

Valderrama, Francisco de, 356

Valdés la Vandera, 269

Valdés, Juan de, his influence, 67
his disciples in Reggio, 86

Valdivia, Dutch attack on, 418
as place of punishment, 438

Valtelline, foreign priests expelled, 136
its territory violated, 135

Vandenbosch, Franz, case of, 170

Vanegas, Diego, case of, 361

Van Hoflaquen, Georg, case of, 170

_Varas_ of alguazil, sale of, 224, 225, 349, 501

Vargas, Ant. de, case of his will, 387

Vazquez, Francisco, case of, 394

Vega, Viceroy, relations with Inq., 25

Velazco, Governor of Cartagena, his complaints, 473

Velazco, Juan Francisco, case of, 407, 410

Velazco, Viceroy, complains of Inq., 380

Vélez, Fray Andrés, case of, 399

Vélez, inqr. of Cartagena, 477
transferred to Mexico, 478

Venadita, Viceroy, suppresses Mexican Inq., 298

Vendeja, inqr. of Cartagena, 499

Venice, its regulation of Inq., 132
residence of foreign heretics, 531

Vera, Bp., his quarrel with Canary Inq., 181

Vera Cruz, mutineer sailors in, 268

Verdugo, Bp., on suppression of Inq., 189

Verdugo, Francisco, inqr. of Lima, 363

Vessels, service of, for Roman Inq., 91
seizure of, 156, 169

_Via ordinaria_, 87, 90, 97, 99, 100, 102, 106, 526

Vicente, Juan, case of, 466

Vicente de Santa María as inqr., 196

Viceroyalty of New Granada, 453

Viceroys ordered to favor Inq., 35, 250, 374
excommunication of, 32, 375
not to be excommunicated, 252

Vico, Marquis of, case of, 90

Vienna, Sicilian Inq. subject to, 40

Viera y Clavijo, his history of Canaries, 180

Villadiego, Inqr. of Cartagena, 482, 483, 485, 486, 487

Villar, Viceroy, on clergy of Peru, 320
banishes Catalina Morejon, 356
his complaints of tribunal, 357
his troubles with Inq., 374
is excommunicated, 375
is prosecuted, 376
Villar, his submission, 378, 544
his appeal to Philip II, 379
hands over prisoners of war, 414

Villareal, Abp. of Mexico, 257

Villaroel, Bp. of Chile, 346

Villaroel, Ant. Hernández, case of, 393

_Visitas de navíos_, in Canaries, 176, 179
in Mexico, 266
in Philippines, 304

Visitations of Canaries, 148, 149
of Mexico, 261
of Peru, 357, 367
of Cartagena, 481, 485
of districts of Peru, 332

Vitoria, Elena de, case of, 464, 465

_Voz activa_, officials deprived of, 14

Waldenses in Calabria, 49
eradicated, 79
in Apulia, their fate, 85, 524

Wall-papers, censorship of, 446

Watches undergo censorship, 471

Wealth of Peruvian clergy, 515

White horse, parade of, 430, 437

Widows of officials, their privileges, 31, 42

Will case, quarrel over, 387

Wine, exportation of from Canaries, 156

Witchcraft in Canaries, 167
in New Granada, 464

Witnesses’ names, suppression of, 26, 97

Women, scourging of, 431, 438

Ximenes, Card., his appointment of colonial inqrs., 195

Ximenes, Martin, inqr. of Canaries, 141, 142, 180

Xuquil, Indians of, their idolatry, 211

Yáñez, Gonzalo, case of, 248

Yepes, Rodrigo de, case of, 248

Ynes de Tarifa, case of, 143

Yucatan, _visitas de navíos_ in, 267

Zalduegui, Pedro, inqr. of Lima, 372

Zapata, Governor of Cartagena, 485

Zarate, Fray Francisco de, case of, 243

Zarate, Ortiz de, Inqr. of Cartagena, 494

Zayas, Bravo de, visitor of Canaries, 148, 161

Zuazo, Alonso de, on New Christians, 194

Zubieta, Pedro de, case of, 395

Zumárraga, Bp., burns cacique of Tezcoco, 196

Zuñíga, Viceroy, his subservience, 94

Zurita on Sicilian finances, 24

“_The Greatest Historical Work yet Produced in America_”

A HISTORY OF THE

INQUISITION OF SPAIN

BY

HENRY CHARLES LEA, LL.D.

_In Four Volumes_

“An achievement which places its author at the head of all American
historical students now living. It makes him the peer of Motley,
Prescott and Parkman, his only competitors in the past. To put the
matter shortly Mr. Lea has produced a work on a subject of
absorbing interest, which for many a long day to come must serve as
an authority to European experts on the subject.”--_New York
Times._

_The New York Tribune_ describes the work as “an historical classic
in which thoroughness, fairness and reserve are combined in a
readable presentation of facts of universal interest.”

“Dr. Lea has given the world of thoughtful students a work that
will have a lasting place and a growing power in the right use of
history. His works have found many readers in Europe, where the
questions of Church and State are much more acute than in this
country. Here scholars and the growing army of historical students
and writers all unite to do honor to Doctor Lea as the foremost
American historian, whose researches in an almost unknown field
have shown how great a power he possesses of throwing new light on
old facts and marshalling historical evidence so as to give the
world a new picture of a far-distant past.”--_Philadelphia Ledger._

“Rarely has so significant an institution been so sanely and
comprehensively studied, and rarely has the reader been placed in
so good a position to observe its workings and draw his own
conclusions from the evidence presented.”--_The Nation._

It is one of the most interesting problems in human history that Spain, whose brilliant achievements promised to make her as dominant in the world of letters as in military and naval enterprise, should, within the space of a couple of generations, have become the most uncultured land in Christendom. For this there must have been a cause and no other adequate one than the Inquisition has been discovered. In this work Dr. Lea makes clear the progress of its influence.

_Complete in four 8vo volumes, cloth, gilt tops, the set, $10, net._

THE MACMILLAN COMPANY PUBLISHERS 64-66 Fifth Avenue New York

_BY THE SAME AUTHOR_

HISTORY OF THE

INQUISITION OF THE MIDDLE AGES

_In Three Volumes_

“To write of the Inquisition without bitterness, to bring the operations to calm analysis, to seek out its origin and reason for being in the conditions of the time, and to trace its influences--such is the task to which Dr. Lea brings the experience of a born investigator and the poise and dignity of a trained historian.”--_New York Tribune._

“There are some books which reveal the loftiest effort of a broad and earnest life; such a book springs from the highest aims, and will therefore be recognized not only as scientific, but as giving impulse to the intellectual action and aspiration of its epoch. Such a book is the ‘History of the Inquisition of the Middle Ages,’ by Henry Charles Lea.”--_Frankfurter Zeitung._

_Cloth, the set, $7.50, net._

A HISTORY OF

SACERDOTAL CELIBACY IN THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH

_In Two Volumes, Third Edition, Revised_

Of special interest to those who are watching a modern trend toward clerical ascetic celibacy. It aims to be an impartial statement of facts with references to the authority substantiating the statement.

_Cloth, the set, $5, net._

THE MACMILLAN COMPANY PUBLISHERS 64-66 Fifth Avenue New York

FOOTNOTES:

[1] Páramo de Origine S. Officii S. Inquisitionis, pp. 197-99.--Ripoll Bullar. Ord. Fr. Prædic., III, 510.--La Mantia, L’Inquisizione in Sicilia, pp. 16-18 (Torino, 1886).

[2] Pirri, Sicilia Sacra, p. 910 (Panormi, 1733).--Llorente, Hist. crít. de la Inquisicion de España, Append. No. III.

[3] La Mantia, _op. cit._, pp. 20-1.--Franchina, Breve Rapporto del Tribunale della SS. Inquisizione in Sicilia, pp. 23, 108-16 (Palermo, 1744).

If we may believe an inscription of 1631, Ranzano had been inquisitor in 1482.--Jo. Mariæ Bertini Sacratissima Inquisitionis Rosa Virginea, I, 385 (Panormi, 1662). He died in 1492.

[4] Zurita, Añales de Aragon, Lib. XIX, cap. xiv.--Giov. di Giovanni, L’Ebraismo della Sicilia, pp. 190-1 (Palermo, 1748).

[5] Giovanni, pp. 21, 96.

Isidor Loeb considers the ordinary computations to be grossly exaggerated and, from the statistics of several places, assumes the total to have been not more than from twenty to thirty thousand.--Revue des Etudes Juives, 1887, p. 172.

[6] Giovanni, p. 210.--This _celeste benefizio_, as the pious author terms it, proved so destructive to the commercial prosperity of the island that, in 1695, the Jews were invited to return, under certain rigorous restrictions. As they manifested no readiness to avail themselves of the permission, the invitation was repeated in a more attractive form in 1727 and, this proving unavailing, still further inducements were offered in 1740. Even this, however, did not produce the desired effect and the edict was revoked in 1747.--Ibidem, pp. 239-42.

[7] Giovanni, pp. 233-5.

[8] The Sicilian _onza_ was nearly equivalent to 2-3/10 ducats.

[9] Archivo general de Simancas, Consejo de la Inquisicion, Libro 1.

[10] Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Libro 2, fol. 23, 24.

[11] Under the same date Obregon was ordered to pay salaries as follows:

Doctor Johan Sgalambro, inquisitor 6000 sueldos jaquenses. Martin de Vallejo, alguazil 6000 “ “ Johan Crespo, portero 500 “ “ A notario del secreto } { 2500 “ “ A notario de los secuestros } To be appointed by the { 2500 “ “ A fiscal } inquisitors { 2500 “ “ Diego de Obregon, receiver 6000 “ “ --Archivo de Simancas, _ubi sup_.

Although no salary is here provided for the Bishop of Cefalù, it does not follow that bishops were expected to serve gratuitously. When Pedro de Belorado was sent to Sicily as Archbishop of Messina and inquisitor, Obregon was ordered, Sept. 10, 1501, to pay him the same salary as that of Sgalambro whom he replaced.--Ibidem.

The _sueldo_ was one-twentieth of the _libra_, which was nearly equivalent to the Castilian ducat.

[12] Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 1.

[13] La Mantia, pp. 23, 25, 26, 28.

[14] Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 1.

[15] Ibidem. Sgalambro managed to regain the royal favor, for a letter of Ferdinand, April 23, 1506, gratifies him with the Cistercian abbey of S. Maria di Terrana, burdened, however, with a pension of eighty ducats to the official chronicler, Luca de Marinis, better known as L. Marinæus Siculus.--Pirri Sicilia Sacra, I, 670.

[16] La Mantia, pp. 27, 28.

[17] Parecer de Martin Real (MSS. of Bodleian Library, Arch. Seld., 130).

[18] La Mantia, p. 28.

[19] Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 3, fol. 51, 52, 77, 81, 82, 83.

[20] Ibidem, fol. 127.

[21] La Mantia, p. 29.

[22] Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 3, fol. 134, 148, 153.

[23] Portocarrero, Sobre la Competencia en Mallorca, n. 38 (Madrid, 1624).--Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 3, fol. 30.

[24] Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 3, fol. 116. In December, however, Ferdinand increased the number of familiars to twenty in each large city.--Ibidem, fol. 135.

[25] Ibidem, fol. 127.

[26] Parecer de Martin Real, _ubi sup._ Possibly this is too absolute an attribution of the troubles of 1511 to the Inquisition, though Doctor Real, as an official of the tribunal, ought to be good authority, even though not a contemporary. Fazelli, who was a boy at the time, says (De Rebus Siculis, Decad. II, Lib. ix, cap. 11) that it was occasioned by the outrages committed by the unpaid and starving Spanish troops.

[27] Llorente, Añales de la Inquisicion, II, 26.

[28] Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 3, fol. 202 (see Appendix).

[29] La Mantia, pp. 30-32.

[30] Amabile, Il Santo Officio in Napoli, I, 109 (Città di Castello, 1892).

[31] Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 3, fol. 239, 294, 296, 314.

[32] Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, fol. 331.

[33] La Mantia, pp. 38, 39.

[34] Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 3, fol. 311.

[35] Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 918, fol. 379.--Martin Real, _ubi sup._

[36] Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 3, fol. 314; Lib. 933.

[37] Argensola, Añales de Aragon, Lib. I, cap. 5.--Caruso, Memorie istoriche di Sicilia, T. VI, p. 119.

One of Moncada’s arbitrary acts concerned the Inquisition. In 1517, when the receiver Garcí Cid was settling his accounts, he claimed credit for 700 ounces which he had deposited with a banker in Messina, where Moncada seized it. Cardinal Adrian the inquisitor-general thereupon ordered Inquisitor Cervera to summon the banker to return the money, for the viceroy had express orders from Ferdinand not to meddle with the property of the tribunal. If, however, the banker could prove that Moncada had taken it by force, then Garcí Cid could proceed to collect it from the revenues of the Priorazgo of St. John at Messina, which belonged to Moncada. If the banker could not prove this, he must pay the money and have recourse against the property and revenues of Moncada. Hereafter, Adrian concludes, no one shall dare to take the property of the Inquisition, for the Catholic king ordered that it should be used to purchase rents for the perpetuation of the tribunal.--Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 933.

[38] Argensola, _op. cit._, Lib. I, cap. 5, 34.--Fazelli de Rebus Siculis, Decad., Lib. 10.--La Mantia, pp. 40-42.--Dormer, Añales de Aragon, cap. 2.--P. Mart. Angler. Epistt., 593, 594.--Carta de D. Hugo de Moncada, 22 de Marzo, 1516 (Coleccion de Documentos inéditos, XXIV, 136).

[39] Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 74, fol. 16; Lib. 921, fol. 38.

[40] Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 9, fol. 39.--Franchina, _op. cit._, pp. 122, 127.

In 1630 Messina appealed to its fidelity on this occasion, when resisting a proposition to divide the island into two viceroyalties.--Razones apologéticas de la noble Ciudad de Mecina, fol. 48 (Madrid, 1630).

[41] La Mantia, p. 42.

[42] Ibidem, pp. 45-6. The autos were:

1519, June 11, 4 men burnt and 1 woman. 1520, July 8, 3 “ “ 2 “ 1521, June 9, 1 “ “ 1524, Aug. 6, 4 “ “ 1 “ 1525, Sept. 29, 1 “ “ 4 “ 1526, Aug. 1, 3 “ “ 1 “ Sept. 16, 1 “ “

A letter of August 19, 1519, from the Suprema to Calvete expresses the highest satisfaction with him and offers him, on his return to Spain, one of the principal tribunals of Castile. In 1529 we find him Inquisitor of Sarogossa.--Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 74, fol. 165; Lib. 76, fol. 183.

Calvete’s earlier years of office were much harassed by a suit brought against him in Rome by Juan de Leon, a canon of Córdova. Prior to 1516, Calvete as provisor of Córdova had prosecuted Leon and some others for rescuing a culprit from an alguazil. Leon nursed his wrath and when in Rome, in 1519, commenced an action against Calvete in the papal courts which caused him so much vexation that he threatened to abandon his post in Sicily and return to Spain. Charles V intervened, writing repeatedly to his ambassadors, to cardinals and to Leon himself, threatening him with the seizure of his temporalities, but the vindictive canon held good and, in 1520, obtained a judgement of 1000 ducats and costs, as Calvete could not go to Rome to defend himself.--Archivo de Simancas, Inq., Lib. 6, fol. 74, 75, 78; Lib. 9, fol. 52-54.

[43] La Mantia, p. 43.

[44] Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 933. These instructions were probably the result of the report of a _visitador_ or inspector, Juan de Ariola, sent, towards the close of 1513, to investigate the tribunals of Majorca, Sardinia and Sicily.--Ibidem, Lib. 3, fol. 251-4.

[45] Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 933 (see Appendix).

[46] Salelles de Materiis Tribunalis S. Inquis., I, 30 (Romæ, 1651).--Franchina, pp. 131-7.

[47] La Mantia, pp. 44-5.--Parecer de Martin Real, _ubi sup._

[48] La Mantia, pp. 47-8.

[49] Páramo, p. 201.

[50] Montoiche, Voyage de Charles-Quint au Pays de Tunis (Gachard, Voyages des Souverains des Pays-bas, III, 378).

[51] Franchina, p. 169.--“Havemos proveydo y mandado que los inquisidores del dicho Reyno no hobiesen de conocer, dentro termino de cinco años, de ninguna cosa que hoviere pena de muerte contra ningun persona natural de dicho Reyno.”--A Latin version is printed by Páramo, p. 204.

The phraseology of the decree would seem to suspend the spiritual as well as the temporal jurisdiction of the tribunal and historians have generally so regarded it. This however is impossible as the former was a delegation from the pope over which the emperor had no control and any attempt to do so would have been equivalent to abolishing the Inquisition, while the auto of 1541 shows that it continued to exercise its spiritual jurisdiction. It assumed however that its capacity to suppress heresy was fatally crippled by depriving its officials of the privilege of its exclusive forum, as expressed in a document quoted by Franchina (p. 69)--“Notandum est quod quando in anno 1535 fuit limitata seu suspensa jurisdictio temporalis hujus Sancti Officii in aliquibus casibus per invictissimum imperatorem Carolum V felicis memoriæ, jurisdictio spiritualis causarum fidei fuit in suspenso et quasi mortua.” So a consulta of the Suprema to Philip III, October 2, 1609, refers to Charles having deprived the Sicilian Inquisition of its temporal jurisdiction, resulting in such recrudescence of heresy that he was obliged to restore it.--Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 927, fol. 323.

Inquisitor Páramo, in a letter of November 8, 1600, to Philip III, states the case to be that Charles was misled by false accounts of the misdeeds of the familiars and deprived them of their immunities but, on being better informed, he restored them.--Ibidem, Lib. 41, fol. 258.

[52] Páramo, pp. 202-3.--Parecer de Martin Real, ubi sup.

[53] Franchina, pp. 149, 159, 163.

[54] Páramo, p. 43. I give the date of 1543 as stated by Páramo, but it is evidently an error for 1516, when the tumult occurred under Cervera.

[55] Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Sala 40, Lib. 4, fol. 136. The financial mismanagement of the Sicilian tribunal was notorious. In 1560, the Contador-general Zurita states that he had finished auditing its accounts with much labor, as they had not been examined for twenty years and were in much disorder.--Ibidem, fol. 239.

[56] La Mantia, p. 50.

[57] Franchina, pp. 167, 183.--Páramo, p. 204.

[58] Llorente, Historia crítica, cap. XVI, art. ii, n. 5. The date of this affair is not unimportant and has curiously been involved in doubt. As printed by Llorente, the letter of December 16, 1543, is duly signed Prince Philip and is doubtless correctly dated, as Terranova was governor in 1544 (Gervasii Siculæ Sanctiones, I, 295). It is somewhat remarkable that in the Simancas archives (Legajo 1465, fol. 60) there are two letters of Philip II on this affair, one dated from the Escorial, April 24, 1568, to the Sicilian inquisitors and the other to Terranova, dated from Madrid, April 29, 1568. The dates are evidently erroneous for in that year the Marquis of Pescara was viceroy (Gervasii, III, 121). Portocarrero also blunders in the date (_op. cit._, n. 105), placing the affair in 1608. La Mantia moreover says (p. 52) that a MS. copy of a letter of the inquisitors, April 10th, bears a later date. A letter of the Suprema to the inquisitors, prescribing the punishment, is dated December 15th, without indication of the year (Simancas, Lib. 78, fol. 372). It speaks of two familiars tortured, orders Terranova to hear mass in a monastery as a penitent and to pay the sufferers 200 ducats, to which the officials concerned in the affair were to add 100 more.

[59] Franchina, p. 174.

[60] La Mantia, pp. 52-4.--Franchina, p. 188.--Portocarrero, n. 77.

[61] Franchina, pp. 45-53.

[62] La Mantia, pp. 55-6.

[63] La Mantia, pp. 58-9.

[64] Páramo, p. 210.--MSS. of Library of Univ. of Halle, Yc, 17.

[65] MSS. of Royal Library of Copenhagen, 214 fol.--Páramo, p. 212.

[66] Franchina, p. 78.

[67] MSS. of Library of Univ. of Halle, Yc, 17.

[68] MSS. of Library of Univ. of Halle, Yc, 17.

[69] Ibidem, _ubi sup._

[70] Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 41, fol. 258, 263. In his letter Páramo mentions that not long before two Calvinist missionaries had been sent from Geneva to Sicily; the Inquisition arrested them and their converts and one of the missionaries had been burnt alive, showing the steadfastness of his faith.

[71] Gervasii Siculæ Sanctiones, II, 329 (Panormi, 1751).

[72] La Mantia, pp. 69-70. There is a very vivid account of this affair in a letter to the Suprema from Páramo and his colleagues, written on the evening of August 9th, when they were expecting further ill treatment by the viceroy, whom they characterize in the most unflattering terms.--Bibl. Nacional de Madrid, MSS., Cc, 58, p. 35.

Páramo, in a document of March 8, 1600, had already described him as a declared enemy of the Inquisition.--Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 41, fol. 249.

[73] Portocarrero, _op. cit._, n. 1.--Solorzani de Indiarum Gubernatione, Lib. iii, cap. xxiv, n. 16.--A virtual duplicate of this letter was sent, September 10, 1670, by the Queen-regent Maria Anna of Austria, to the Prince de Ligne, then Viceroy of Sicily.--Mongitore, L’Atto pubblico di Fede de 1724, p. v. (Palermo, 1724).

[74] Biblioteca nacional de Madrid, MSS., D, 118, fol. 134, n. 47.

[75] Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Legajo 1465, fol. 35.

[76] Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Libro 38, fol. 298.

[77] Consulta Magna de 1696 (Bibl. nacional de Madrid, MSS., Q, 4).

[78] Alberghini, Manuale Qualificatorum, p. 171 (Cæsaraugustæ, 1671).

[79] La Mantia, pp. 79-86.

[80] Franchina, pp. 100, 101.

[81] Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 21, fol. 252; Lib. 23, fol. 62, 119; Lib. 38, fol. 245, 298.

[82] Archivo hist. nacional, Inquisicion de Valencia, Legajo 13, n. 2, fol. 157. Cozio’s salary in Valencia commenced with May 1st, as he had received in Palermo the advanced _tercio_ of January 1st.

[83] La Mantia, p. 92.--Franchina, p. 38.--Mongitore, L’Atto pubblico di Fede celebrato à 6 Aprile, 1724 (Palermo, 1724). This work of Mongitore was reprinted in 1868, when the editor F. Guidicini mentions in the Preface that on March 9th of that year a petition was presented to the Italian Chamber of Deputies, from a Palermitan family, begging the remission of a yearly payment to the royal domain, imposed on them by the Inquisition to defray the expenses of the trial of their kinswoman, the Sister Geltruda, burnt in 1724.

It was probably the celebration of this auto that inspired an anonymous writer to denounce the inquisitorial procedure in a little work entitled “Le prove praticate nelli tempi presenti dagl’ Inquisitori di Fede sono manchevole.” This was answered by Doctor Don Miguel Monge, a professor in the University of Huesca in “La verdadera Practica Apostolica de el S. Tribunal de la Inquisicion” (Palermo, 1725). He seems in this to consider all criticism sufficiently answered by demonstrating that the practices complained of are in accordance with the papal instructions. The work illustrates the anomalous position of the Sicilian Inquisition at the period. It is written by a Spaniard, printed in both Spanish and Italian, dated in Vienna and dedicated to Don Ramon de Villana Perlas, a Catalan member of the Imperial Council of State.

[84] Franchina, pp. 44, 55.

[85] Gervasii Siculæ Sanctiones, II, 333-50.

[86] Ibidem, I, 277-81.

[87] La Mantia, p. 103.--Franchina, pp. 201, 206.

[88] Gervasii, _op. cit._, I, 286; II, 352.

[89] La Mantia, pp. 108 sqq.

[90] Franchina, p. 43.

[91] Acta Historico-Ecclesiastica nostri temporis, T. IX, p. 74 (Weimar, 1783).

[92] Salelles de Materiis Tribunalium Inquisit., I, 43.

[93] Llorente, Hist. crit., cap. XIII, art. ii, n. 9.

[94] Salelles, I, 47-50.

[95] Salelles, I, 53-62.

[96] Parecer de Martin Real, _ubi sup._

[97] Llorente, Hist. crit., cap. XVII, art. ii, n. 10.

[98] A Brief History of the Voyage of Katharine Evans and Sarah Cheevers to the Island of Malta and their Cruel Sufferings there for near Four Years. London, 1715.

[99] History of the Inquisition of the Middle Ages, II, 268.

[100] Itinerarium Beniamini Tudelens., pp. 21-5 (Antverpiæ, 1575).

[101] Wadding, Annal. Minorum, T. III, Regesta, p. 392; ann. 1447, n. 10.

[102] Ripoll Bullar. Ord. FF. Prædic., II, 689.

[103] Zurita, Hist. del Rey Hernando, Lib. v, cap. lxx.

[104] Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Libro I. An episode of this business concerned one Nofre Pelayo, a merchant of Valencia, who was arrested on the charge of concealing some of Pantolosa’s property. On January 15, 1498, Ferdinand warmly praised the inquisitor for this action but he speedily changed his mind and, on March 6th, scolded him for keeping Pelayo in prison and refusing to admit him to bail. It seems that he had in his hands two hundred and fifty ducats, supposed to belong to Pantolosa, but the sum was claimed by Miguel de Fluto, who luckily was a kinsman of the Neapolitan ambassador; the latter induced his master to write on the subject to Ferdinand who, on March 19, 1499, ordered the sum to be paid to the ambassador’s order.--Ibidem.

These transactions are worth noting as an illustration of the destructive influence on commerce of the methods of confiscation.

[105] Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. I.

[106] Amabile (Il Santo Officio in Napoli, I, 93) assures us that there is no trace of such a condition expressed in the documents, but undoubtedly some compact of the kind must have been made. This is evident from the fact that when, in 1504, Ferdinand and Isabella resolved to introduce the Inquisition they formally released Gonsalvo from the obligation, giving as a reason that no Catholic was required to observe obligations in derogation of the faith--“non obstantibus in præmissis aut aliquo præmissorum quibusvis pactis, conventionibus aut capitulationibus per vos præfatum illustrem ducem aut alium quemcunque, nomine nostro vel vestro in deditione civitatis Neapolis aut alias quandocunque factis, conventis aut juratis, cum ea quæ contra fidem faciunt nullo pacto a Catholicis observanda sunt, quinimmo easdem si tales sunt quæ prædictis aliquatenus obviare censeantur cum præsentibus quoad hæc revocamus, taxamus, annullamus et irritamus, pro cassisque, irritis ac nullis nulliusque roboris seu momenti haberi volumus et habemus, cæteris autem ad hæc non tangentibus in suo robore permanentibus.”--Páramo, De Origine Officii S. Inquisit., p. 192.

This is repeated more concisely in another personal letter to Gonsalvo of the same date.--Ibidem, p. 193.

[107] Amabile, I, 101. When Charles of Anjou introduced the Inquisition he took the confiscations, as was customary in France, and paid the expenses, but in 1290 his son, Charles the Lame, divided the proceeds into thirds, one for the fisc, one for the Inquisition and one for the propagation of the faith, a rule which probably became permanent.--Hist. of Inquisition of Middle Ages, I, 511-12.

[108] Chioccarello MSS., T. VIII. This is a well-known collection of documents from the Neapolitan archives, made in the seventeenth century by Bartolommeo Chioccarello, which has never been printed. The eighth volume is devoted to the Inquisition.

[109] Zurita, Hist. del Rey Hernando, Lib. v, cap. lxx. Benevento was a papal enclave in Neapolitan territory.

[110] Páramo, pp. 191-4.

[111] Páramo, _loc. cit._

[112] Ferrarelli, Tiberio Caraffa e la Congiura di Macchia, p. 8 (Napoli, 1884).--MSS. of Library of Univ. of Halle, Ye, T. XVII.

[113] Chioccarello MSS., T. VIII.

[114] Amabile, I, 97.

[115] Chioccarello MSS., T. VIII. (see Appendix).

[116] Zurita, _op. cit._, Lib. ix, cap. xxiv.

[117] A royal cédula of September 3, 1509, to Matheo de Morrano, appointed as receiver, orders him to pay the following salaries, to commence from the date of leaving home for the journey. The sums are in gold ducats:

Ayuda Salary. de costa. The Bishop of Cefalù, inquisitor, 300 200 Dr. Andrés de Palacios, inquisitor, 300 100 Dr. Melchior, judge of confiscations, 100 Matheo de Morrano, receiver, 300 150 Joan de Moros, alguazil, 200 60 Dr. Diego de Bonilla, procurador fiscal, 200 50 Miguel de Asiz, notary of secreto and court of confiscations, 100 50 Joan de Villena, notary of secreto, 100 50 abriel de Fet, notary of sequestrations, 100 A gaoler, 54 15 Johan de Vergara, messenger, 30 10 Juan Vazquez, messenger, 30 10 ---- ---- 1814 695

Palacios was paid eight months’ salary in advance by the receiver of Barcelona.--Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. III, fol. 1, 52.

[118] Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. III, fol. 2-11.

[119] Tristani Caraccioli, Epist. de Inquisitione (Muratori, S. R. I., T. XXII, p. 97).--Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 3, fol. 68, 74.--Amabile, I, 101-18.--Zurita, Hist. del Rey Hernando, Lib. ix, cap. xxvi.--Spondani Annal. Eccles., ann. 1510, n. 13.

The formula withdrawing the Inquisition was “Havendo el Rey nostro Signore cogniosciuto la antiqua observancia e religione de la fidelissima Cita di napoli et de tucto questo regno verso la santa fe catholica sua Altezza ha mandato et ordinato levarese la inquisicione da dicta Cita et de tucto il regno predicto per lo bene vivere universale de tucti; et ultra questo su Altezza ha mandato publicare le infrascripte pragmatiche, dato in castello nova, napoli 22 novembre, 1510.”--Amabile, p. 118.

In Ferdinand’s letter books there is nothing further respecting the Neapolitan troubles until May 27, 1511, he writes to Diego de Obregon, the receiver of Sicily, that the Bishop of Cefalù returns there by his orders and, in view of his sufferings for the Inquisition his salary must be paid. Yet he died without receiving it and, on February 16, 1514, Ferdinand ordered Obregon to pay the arrears to Mariano de Acardo, in reward for certain services rendered, but this was still unpaid in January of the following year. As for Andrés Palacios, a cédula of June 6, 1511, recognized him as inquisitor of Valencia, with salary dating back to January 1st and an ayuda de costa of a hundred ducats.--Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 3, fol. 145, 146, 280, 313.

[120] Ibidem, Lib. 3, fol. 238, 239.

[121] Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 3, fol. 238, 239, 260, 261, 292, 295, 316, 317, 350.

[122] Amabile, I, 119-20.

[123] Giacinto de’ Mari, Riflessioni ... in difesa della Cittá e Regno di Napoli (MS. _penes me_).

[124] Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 78, fol. 39.

[125] Chronicle of Rabbi Joseph ben Joshua ben Meir (Bialloblotsky’s Translation, II, 318-19).--Parrino, Teatro de’ Vicere, I, 175 (Napoli, 1730).

[126] Caballero, Alonso y Juan de Valdés, pp. 182 sqq. (Madrid, 1875).

[127] See Karl Benrath in _Historisches Taschenbuch_, 1885, p. 172; also his _Bernardino Ochino von Siena_, Leipzig, 1875.--Manzoni, Estratto del Processo di Pietro Carnesecchi, Torino, 1870.

[128] Le Cento e dieci divine Considerationi del S. Giovãni Valdesso: nelle quali si ragiona delle cose piu utili, piu necessarie e piu perfette, della Christiana professione. In Basilea, M.D.L.

“Ingannati principalmente della superstitione e falsa religione ci fanno relatione che Dio è tanto delicato e sensitivo che per qualunque cosa si offende: che è tanto vendicativo che tutte le offese castiga: che è tanto crudele che le castiga con pena eterna: che è tanto inhumano che si gode che trattiamo male nostre persone, in fino allo sparger il nostro propio sangre, il quale egli ci ha dato: e che ci priviamo delle nostre facoltà, le quale egli ci ha dato, accio che con esse si manteniamo nella presente vita: che si gode che andiamo nudi e scalzi, continuamente patendo; che è vano e li piacciono li presenti e che gode di haver oro e belli parimenti, ed in somma che si diletta di tutte le cose delle quali un Tiranno si diletta; e si gode di haver da coloro che li sono soggetti.”--Consid. XXXVII.

This edition of Basle, 1550, is the original from which the numerous translations have been made. For the bibliography, see Böhmer, _Bibliotheca Wiffeniana_, I, 124-29 (Strassburg, 1874). Also, Wiffen and Betts, “Life and Writings of Juan de Valdés,” London, 1865.

Antonio Caracciolo styles Valdés “capo e maestro” of the Neapolitan heretics, who gave the Roman Inquisition early occasion to demonstrate its usefulness.

[129] Manuel Serrano y Sanz (Revista de Archivos etc., Febrero, 1903, p. 129).

[130] “Con questa risolutione condanna l’uomo il giudicio della prudentia e della ragione humana e renuncia il suo lume naturale ed entra nel regno di Dio, remettendosi al reggimento ed al governo di Dio.”--Ibidem, Consid. XXV.

[131] Lac Spirituale Johannis de Valdés. Ed. Koldewey, Heilbronn, 1863.

[132] Trataditos de Juan de Valdés, p. 179 (Bonn, 1880).

The germ of much of this tract may be found in the _Militiæ Christianæ Enchiridion_, Canon 5, in which Erasmus dwells on the worthlessness of external observances and stigmatizes the importance attached to them as a kind of new Judaism. Yet the _Enchiridion_ was repeatedly reprinted after its first appearance, in 1502, and was approved by Adrian of Utrecht, subsequently Adrian VI.

[133] Giannone, Istoria civile del Regno di Napoli, Lib. XXII, cap. v, § 1 (Haya, 1753).

[134] Chioccarelli Antistitum Neapol. Eccles. Catalogus, p. 321 (Neapoli, 1642).

On the death of Carafa in 1544, Paul III gave the see to his own nephew, Rainuccio Farnese, a boy of fifteen. It was then administered through vicars, the one at the time of the troubles of 1547 being Fabio Mirto, Bishop of Cajazzo.--Ibidem, p. 326.

[135] Bullar Roman. I, 762.

[136] Amabile, I, 193-6. It would seem that, at this time, the Holy See claimed inquisitorial jurisdiction over Naples, for a papal brief of June 2, 1544 orders the viceroy to arrest and send under sure guard to Rome, Vespasiano di Agnone, a wandering Franciscan friar, guilty of sacrilege and other enormous crimes.--Fontana, Documenti Vaticani, p. 131 (Roma, 1892).

[137] Antonio Caracciolo, in his MS. life of Paul IV, of which an extract is printed by Bernino (Historia di tutte l’Heresie, IV, 496) informs us that Cardinal Giovanni Piero Carafa, the head of the Roman Inquisition and afterwards Paul IV, did not want the Spanish Inquisition introduced in Naples because it was more subject to the crown than to the Holy See and the king took the confiscations.

[138] For most of these details I am indebted to a MS. account by Antonio Castaldo, a notary who was intimate with all the leaders in these events. He was a devoted subject of Charles V and considered himself most fortunate in having been born in his time. He warmly praises the emperor’s clemency towards the city. Amabile’s elaborate narrative (I, 196-211) furnishes additional facts and Döllinger (Beiträge zur Polit.-, Kirch.-u. Cultur-Geschichte, I, 78-124) gives Mendoza’s correspondence. See also Giannone, Ist. Civile, Lib. XXXII, cap. v, § 1.--Páramo, pp. 194-5.--Natalis Comitis Historiar., Lib. II, pp. 35, 52 (Argentorati, 1612).--Pallavicini, Hist. Concil. Trident., Lib. X, cap. i, n. 4.--Collenucio da Pesaro, Compendio dell’ Historia del Regno di Napoli, II, 184 (Napoli, 1563).--Campana, La Vita di Don Filippo Secondo, P. I, fol. 7 sqq. (Vicenza, 1608).

The narrative of Uberto Foglietta (Tumultus Neapolitani sub Petro Toleto Prorege), though he was a contemporary who tells us that he visited Naples for the purpose of ascertaining the facts, is a confused and turgid piece of rhetoric, of no historical value.

[139] Julii PP. III, Bull _Licet a diversis_, 18 Mart., 1551 (Bullar. Roman. I, 799).