Chapter LXXXIV: Section III: , p. 42 (3)

[1402] (1896), 84 Hun., 12.

[1403] (1896), 75 Fed. Rep., 703.

[1404] (1896), 75 Fed. Rep., 703.

[1405] (1898), 155 N. Y., 241.

[1406] _Jewellers'_ v. _Jewellers'_ (1895), 84 Hun., 12.

[1407] _Osgood_ v. _Aloe_ (1897), 83 Fed. Rep., 470; _Gottsberger_ v. _Aldine_ (1887), 33 Fed. Rep., 381; _Baker_ v. _Taylor_ (1848), 2 Blatchf., 82.

[1408] _Per_ Parker, Ch. J., in _Jewellers'_ v. _Jewellers'_ (1898), 155 N. Y., at p. 251.

[1409] _D'Ole_ v. _Kansas_ (1899), 94 Fed. Rep., 840.

[1410] _Black_ v. _Allen_ (1893), 56 Fed. Rep., 764; see _Baker_ v. _Taylor_ (1848), 2 Blatchf., 82; _Wall_ v. _Gordon_ (1872), 12 Abb. Pr. N. S. (N. Y.), 349.

[1411] _Press Publishing Co._ v. _Monroe_ (1896), 73 Fed. Rep., 196; and see _Blunt_ v. _Patten_ (1828), 2 Paine, 397; _Keene_ v. _Wheatley_ (1860), 9 Am. L. Reg., 45.

[1412] _Bartlett_ v. _Crittenden_ (1847), 4 M'L., 301.

[1413] _Falk_ v. _Gast_ (1893), 54 Fed. Rep., 890.

[1414] _French_ v. _Kreling_ (1894), 63 Fed. Rep., 621.

[1415] _Kiernan_ v. _Manhattan_ (1876), 50 How. Prac., 194.

[1416] _Rigney_ v. _Dalton_ (1896), 77 Fed. Rep., 176.

[1417] _Jewellers'_ v. _Jewellers'_ (1898), 155 N. Y., 241.

[1418] _Larrowe_ v. _O'Loughlin_ (1898), 88 Fed. Rep., 896.

[1419] _Jewellers'_ v. _Jewellers'_ (1898), 155 N. Y., 241; _Ladd_ v. _Oxnard_ (1896), 75 Fed. Rep., 703.

[1420] _Holmes_ v. _Hurst_ (1898), 174 U. S. Rep. 82; _Holmes_ v. _Donohue_ (1896), 77 Fed. Rep., 179; _Mifflin_ v. _Dutton_ (1901), 107 Fed. Rep., 708.

[1421] See _Bartlett_ v. _Crittenden_ (1847), 4 M. L., 301; _Rees_ v. _Peltzer_ (1874), 75 Ill., 475; _Keene_ v. _Wheatley_ (1860), 9 Am. L. Rep., 45; _Palmer_ v. _De Witt_ (1872), 47 N. Y., 532.

[1422] _Palmer_ v. _De Witt_ (1872), 47 N. Y., 532; _Aronson_ v. _Fleckenstein_ (1886), 28 Fed. Rep., 75; _Bartlett_ v. _Crittenden_ (1847), 4 M'L., 301; _Boucicault_ v. _Hart_ (1875), 13 Blatchf., 47; _Tompkins_ v. _Halleck_ (1882), 133 Mass., 32; _Keene_ v. _Wheatley_ (1860), 4 Phil., 157; _Keene_ v. _Kimball_ (1860), 16 Gray, 549; _Boucicault_ v. _Fox_ (1862), 5 Blatchf., 87; _Crowe_ v. _Aiken_ (1870), 2 Biss., 208; _Thomas_ v. _Lennox_ (1883), 14 Fed. Rep., 849; _Keene_ v. _Clarke_ (1867), 5 Rob. (N. Y.), 38; _Shook_ v. _Rankin_ (1875), 6 Biss., 477; _French_ v. _Maguire_ (1867), 55 How. (N. Y.) Prac., 471.

[1423] _Pierce_ v. _Werckmeister_ (1896), 72 Fed. Rep., 57.

[1424] _Werckmeister_ v. _Springer_ (1894), 63 Fed. Rep., 808.

[1425] _Palmer_ v. _De Witt_ (1872), 47 N. Y., 532; _Boucicault_ v. _Wood_ (1867), 2 Biss., 34; _Crowe_ v. _Aiken_ (1870), 2 Biss., 208.

[1426] _Daly_ v. _Walrath_ (1899), 40 App. Div., N. Y., 220.

[1427] Ibid.

[1428] _Boucicault_ v. _Wood_ (1867), 2 Biss., at p. 39.

[1429] Act of 1891, sec. 4, amending Revised Statutes, sec. 4958; and see Act, June 18, 1874, sec. 2.

[1430] Act of 1891, sec. 4.

[1431] Ibid.

[1432] Revised Statutes, sec. 4961.

[1433] Revised Statutes, sec. 4960.

[1434] _Martinetti_ v. _Maguire_ (1867), 1 Abb. U. S., 356; _Shook_ v. _Daly_ (1875), 49 How. Prac., 366; _Keene_ v. _Kimball_ (1860), 16 Gray, 549.

[1435] _Broder_ v. _Zeno_ (1898), 88 Fed. Rep., 74.

[1436] Ibid.

[1437] _Richardson_ v. _Miller_ (1877), 3 L. and Eq. Rep. (Am.), 614.

[1438] _Egbert_ v. _Greenberg_ (1900), 100 Fed. Rep., 447.

[1439] _American Trotting Register_ v. _Gocker_ (1895), 70 Fed. Rep., 237.

[1440] Revised Statutes, sec. 4953.

[1441] Act of 1891, sec. 2.

[1442] (1888), 128 U. S. Rep., 617.

[1443] _Pierpont_ v. _Fowle_ (1846), 2 Wood, and Min., 23, 44; _Cowen_ v. _Banks_ (1862), 24 How. Prac., 72; see _Rundell_ v. _Murray_ (1821), Jac., 315.

[1444] _Paige_ v. _Banks_ (1871), 13 Wall, 608; (1871), 7 Blatchf., 152.

[1445] _Wheaton_ v. _Peters_ (1834), 8 Pet., 591, 654.

[1446] _Lawrence_ v. _Dana_ (1869), 4 Cliff., 1.

[1447] _Koppel_ v. _Downing_, 24 Wash. L. R., 342.

[1448] _Little_ v. _Gould_ (1851), 2 Blatchf., 165; _Green_ v. _Bishop_ (1858), 1 Cliff., 186, 198; _Yuengling_ v. _Schile_ (1882), 12 Fed. Rep., 97, 100.

[1449] _Yuengling_ v. _Schile_ (1882), 12 Fed. Rep., at p. 106.

[1450] _Heine_ v. _Appleton_ (1853), 4 Blatchf., 125.

[1451] _Press_ v. _Munroe_ (1896), 73 Fed. Rep., 196; _Black_ v. _Allen_ (1893), 56 Fed. Rep., 764.

[1452] _Black_ v. _Allen_ (1893), 56 Fed. Rep., 764.

[1453] _Burrow-Giles_ v. _Sarony_ (1884), 111 U. S., 53.

[1454] _Bullinger_ v. _MacKay_ (1879), 15 Blatchf., 550.

[1455] _Atwill_ v. _Ferrett_ (1846), 2 Blatchf., 39; _Roberts_ v. _Myers_ (1860), 13 L. R. Mass., 396.

[1456] _Gray_ v. _Russell_ (1839), 1 Story, 11; Betts, J., in _Atwill_ v. _Ferrett_ (1846), 2 Blatchf., at p. 46.

[1457] _Aronson_ v. _Fleckenstein_ (1886), 28 Fed. Rep., 75.

[1458] _Carte_ v. _Bailey_ (1874), 64 Maine, 458.

[1459] _Colliery_ v. _Schools_ (1899), 94 Fed. Rep., 152; _Schumacher_ v. _Schwencke_ (1885), 25 Fed. Rep., 466; _Mutual Advertising_ v. _Refo_ (1896), 76 Fed. Rep., 961; _Lawrence_ v. _Dana_ (1869), 4 Cliff., 1; _Little_ v. _Gould_ (1851), 2 Blatchf., 165; _Heine_ v. _Appleton_ (1853), 4 Blatchf., 125; but see _Pierpont_ v. _Fowle_ (1846), 2 Woodb. and M., 23; _Atwill_ v. _Ferrett_ (1846), 2 Blatchf., 39.

[1460] _Dielman_ v. _White_ (1900), 102 Fed. Rep., 892.

[1461] _Boucicault_ v. _Fox_ (1862), 5 Blatchf., 87.

[1462] _Press_ v. _Munroe_ (1896), 73 Fed. Rep., 196; _Black_ v. _Allen_ (1893), 56 Fed. Rep., 764.

[1463] _Lawrence_ v. _Dana_ (1869), 4 Cliff., 1, at pp. 59, 66.

[1464] _Banks_ v. _Manchester_ (1888), 128 U. S. Rep., at p. 253.

[1465] Ibid.

[1466] _Schumacher_ v. _Schwencke_ (1885), 25 Fed. Rep., 466; _Mutual Advertising_ v. _Refo_ (1896), 76 Fed. Rep., 961.

[1467] (1853), 4 Blatchf., 125

[1468] _Little_ v. _Gould_ (1851), 2 Blatchf., 165.

[1469] _Callaghan_ v. _Myers_ (1888), 128 U. S. Rep., 617; _Black_ v. _Allen_ (1890), 42 Fed. Rep., 618; _Carte_ v. _Evans_ (1886), 27 Fed. Rep., 861; _Lawrence_ v. _Dana_ (1869), 4 Cliff., 1, at p. 59; _Little_ v. _Gould_ (1851), 2 Blatchf., 165.

[1470] _Pulte_ v. _Derby_ (1852), 5 M'L., 328; _Little_ v. _Gould_ (1851), 2 Blatchf., 165; _Lawrence_ v. _Dana_ (1869), 4 Cliff., 1.

[1471] Act of February 3, 1831, sec. 9; _Parton_ v. _Prang_ (1872), 3 Cliff., at p. 549; but see _contra_, _Lawrence_ v. _Dana_ (1869), 4 Cliff., 1, at p. 59; _Pulte_ v. _Derby_ (1852), 5 M'L., 328.

[1472] _Parton_ v. _Prang_ (1872), 3 Cliff., 537; _Yuengling_ v. _Schile_ (1882), 12 Fed. Rep., 97; _Werckmeister_ v. _Springer_ (1894), 63 Fed. Rep., 808; _Stevens_ v. _Gladding_ (1854), 17 How., 447; _Stephens_ v. _Cady_ (1852), 14 How., 528; _Carte_ v. _Bailey_ (1874), 64 Maine, 458; see _MacKaye_ v. _Mallory_ (1882), 12 Fed. Rep., 328.

[1473] _Webb_ v. _Powers_ (1847), 2 Woodb. and Min., 497; see _Gould_ v. _Banks_, _Stephens_ v. _Cady_, _Little_ v. _Hall_, _ubi supra_.

[1474] _Gould_ v. _Banks_ (1832), 8 Wend., 562.

[1475] _Black_ v. _Allen_ (1893), 56 Fed. Rep., 764; _Carte_ v. _Evans_ (1886), 27 Fed. Rep., 861.

[1476] _Gilmore_ v. _Anderson_ (1889), 38 Fed. Rep., 846.

[1477] _Black_ v. _Allen_ (1893), 56 Fed. Rep., 764; _Carte_ v. _Bailey_ (1874), 64 Maine, 458.

[1478] _Werckmeister_ v. _Springer_ (1894), 63 Fed. Rep., 808.

[1479] _Publishing Co._ v. _Munroe_ (1896), 73 Fed. Rep., 196.

[1480] _Davies_ v. _Vories_, 42 S. W., 707.

[1481] _Keene_ v. _Wheatley_ (1860), 9 Am. L. Reg., 45.

[1482] But see _Little_ v. _Gould_ (1851), 2 Blatchf., 165.

[1483] _Aronson_ v. _Fleckenstein_ (1886), 28 Fed. Rep., 75.

[1484] Revised Statutes, sec. 4952.

[1485] _Stephens_ v. _Cady_ (1852), 14 How., 528; _Stevens_ v. _Gladding_ (1854), 17 How., 451.

[1486] Act of March 3, 1891, sec. 1.

[1487] _Harper_ v. _Shoppell_ (1886), 23 Blatchf., 431.

[1488] _Morrison_ v. _Pettibone_ (1897), 87 Fed. Rep., 330.

[1489] _Falk_ v. _Donaldson_ (1893), 57 Fed. Rep., 32; _Fishel_ v. _Lueckel_ (1892), 53 Fed. Rep., 499; _Springer_ v. _Falk_ (1894), 20 U. S. App., 296.

[1490] _Falk_ v. _Howell_ (1888), 37 Fed. Rep., 202.

[1491] _Kennedy_ v. _McTammany_ (1888), 33 Fed. Rep., 584.

[1492] _Ladd_ v. _Oxnard_ (1896), 75 Fed. Rep., 703.

[1493] _Schumacher_ v. _Schwencke_ (1887), 30 Fed. Rep., 690.

[1494] _Maloney_ v. _Foote_ (1900), 101 Fed. Rep., 264.

[1495] _Lawrence_ v. _Dana_ (1869), 4 Cliff., 1, 81; _Folsom_ v. _Marsh_ (1841), 2 Story, 118; _Story_ v. _Holcombe_ (1847), 4 M'L., 310; _Reed_ v. _Holliday_ (1884), 19 Fed. Rep., 323; _Brady_ v. _Daly_ (1897), 83 Fed. Rep., 1007; _M'Lean_ v. _Flemming_ (1877), 96 U. S. Rep., 245; _Fishel_ v. _Lueckel_ (1892), 53 Fed. Rep., 499; _Morrison_ v. _Pettibone_ (1897), 87 Fed. Rep., 330; _Millet_ v. _Snowden_ (1843), 1 West L. J., 240; _Parker_ v. _Hulme_ (1849), 7 West L. J., 426.

[1496] _Morrison_ v. _Pettibone_ (1897), 87 Fed. Rep., 330.

[1497] _Lawrence_ v. _Dana_ (1869), 4 Cliff., 1, 81; _Webb_ v. _Powers_ (1847), 2 Wood and Min., 497.

[1498] _Lawrence_ v. _Dana_ (1869), 4 Cliff., 1, p. 73.

[1499] _Mead_ v. _West_ (1896), 80 Fed. Rep., 380.

[1500] _West_ v. _Lawyers_ (1896), 51 U. S. App., 216.

[1501] _Bullinger_ v. _MacKay_ (1879), 15 Blatchf. C. C., 550.

[1502] _Emerson_ v. _Davis_ (1845), 3 Story, 768.

[1503] Ibid.

[1504] _Gray_ v. _Russell_ (1839), 1 Story, 11.

[1505] _Blunt_ v. _Patten_ (1828), 2 Paine, 397.

[1506] _Gilmore_ v. _Anderson_ (1889), 38 Fed. Rep., 846.

[1507] _Johnson_ v. _Donaldson_ (1880), 3 Fed. Rep., 22.

[1508] _Banks_ v. _M'Divitt_ (1875), 13 Blatchf., p. 163; _Mead_ v. _West_ (1896), 80 Fed. Rep., 380.

[1509] _Banks_ v. _M'Divitt_ (1875), 13 Blatchf., at pp. 165, 6.

[1510] _Gilmore_ v. _Anderson_ (1889), 38 Fed. Rep., 846.

[1511] _Thomas_ v. _Lennox_ (1883), 14 Fed. Rep., 849.

[1512] See _Carte_ v. _Duff_ (1885), 25 Fed. Rep., 183.

[1513] Clifford, J., in _Lawrence_ v. _Dana_ (1869), 4 Cliff., at p. 80; _Gray_ v. _Russell_ (1839), 1 Story, 11; _Folsom_ v. _Marsh_ (1841), 2 Story, 100; _Farmer_ v. _Elstner_ (1888), 33 Fed. Rep., 494; _Story_ v. _Holcombe_ (1847), 4 M'L., 315; _Emerson_ v. _Davis_ (1845), 3 Story, at p. 795; _Reed_ v. _Holliday_ (1884), 19 Fed. Rep., 325; _Greene_ v. _Bishop_ (1858), 1 Cliff., 186.

[1514] Story, J., in _Folsom_ v. _Marsh_ (1841), 2 Story, at p. 115.

[1515] _Lawrence_ v. _Dana_ (1869), 4 Cliff., 1, 81, 83; _Perris_ v. _Hexamer_ (1878), 99 U. S. Rep., 674; _Morrison_ v. _Pettibone_ (1897), 87 Fed. Rep., 330.

[1516] Although this is an element in the question of substantiality, it is no answer to a charge of infringement to say that the infringing composition would have been equally valuable without the borrowed matter. _Brady_ v. _Daly_ (1897), 83 Fed. Rep., 1007.

[1517] (1897), 87 Fed. Rep., 330.

[1518] _Howell_ v. _Miller_ (1898), 91 Fed. Rep., 129.

[1519] _Springer_ v. _Falk_ (1894), 20 U. S. App., 296; _Falk_ v. _Donaldson_ (1893), 57 Fed. Rep., 32; _Fishel_ v. _Lueckel_ (1892), 53 Fed. Rep., 499.

[1520] _Farmer_ v. _Culvert_ (1872), 5 Am. L. T. R., 168; see _Sanborn_ v. _Dakin_ (1889), 39 Fed. Rep., 266.

[1521] _Daly_ v. _Palmer_ (1868), 6 Blatchf., 256; _Daly_ v. _Webster_ (1892), 1 U. S. App., 611; _Brady_ v. _Daly_ (1897), 83 Fed. Rep., 1007.

[1522] _Falk_ v. _Donaldson_ (1893), 57 Fed. Rep., 32; _Falk_ v. _Howell_ (1888), 37 Fed. Rep., 202.

[1523] _Mead_ v. _West_ (1896), 80 Fed. Rep., 380; _List_ v. _Keller_ (1887), 30 Fed. Rep., 772.

[1524] Ibid.

[1525] _List_ v. _Keller_ (1887), 30 Fed. Rep., 772.

[1526] (1875), 13 Blatchf., at p. 166.

[1527] Story, J., in _Emerson_ v. _Davis_ (1845), 3 Story, at p. 793.

[1528] _Daly_ v. _Palmer_ (1868), 6 Blatchf., 256; _Daly_ v. _Webster_ (1892), 1 U. S. App., 573; _Goldmark_ v. _Kreling_ (1888), 35 Fed. Rep., 661.

[1529] _Broder_ v. _Zeno_ (1898), 88 Fed. Rep., 74; _Blume_ v. _Spear_ (1887), 30 Fed. Rep., 629; _Jollie_ v. _Jacques_ (1850), 1 Blatchf., 618.

[1530] _West_ v. _Lawyers_ (1894), 64 Fed. Rep., 361.

[1531] _List Publishing Co._ v. _Keller_ (1887), 30 Fed. Rep., 772.

[1532] _Sanborn_ v. _Dakin_ (1889), 39 Fed. Rep., 266; _Farmer_ v. _Culvert_ (1872), 5 Am. L. T. R., 168.

[1533] _Chils_ v. _Gronland_ (1890), 41 Fed. Rep., 145; _Webb_ v. _Powers_ (1847), 2 Wood. and Min., 497.

[1534] _Banks_ v. _M'Divitt_ (1875), 13 Blatchf., 163; _Mead_ v. _West_ (1896), 80 Fed. Rep., 380; _Howell_ v. _Miller_ (1898), 91 Fed. Rep., 129.

[1535] _Banks_ v. _M'Divitt_ (1875), 13 Blatchf., 163.

[1536] _Mead_ v. _West_ (1896), 80 Fed. Rep., 380.

[1537] _Burnell_ v. _Chown_ (1895), 69 Fed. Rep., 993.

[1538] _Munro_ v. _Smith_ (1890), 42 Fed. Rep., 266.

[1539] _Ehret_ v. _Pierce_ (1880), 18 Blatchf., 302; _Mutual Advertising Co._ v. _Refo_ (1896), 76 Fed. Rep., 961.

[1540] _Mutual Advertising Co._ v. _Refo_ (1896), 76 Fed. Rep., 961.

[1541] _Serrana_ v. _Jefferson_ (1888), 33 Fed. Rep., 347.

[1542] (1879), 15 Blatchf., 550.

[1543] _Ladd_ v. _Oxnard_ (1896), 75 Fed. Rep., 703; _Brightley_ v. _Littleton_ (1888), 37 Fed. Rep., 103; _Mead_ v. _West_ (1896), 80 Fed. Rep., 380; _Springer_ v. _Falk_ (1894), 20 U. S. App., 296.

[1544] _Drury_ v. _Ewing_ (1862), 1 Bond., 549.

[1545] _Story_ v. _Holcombe_ (1847), 4 M'L., 306; _Webb_ v. _Powers_ (1847), 2 Wood. and Min., 497, 512.

[1546] _Falk_ v. _Donaldson_ (1893), 57 Fed. Rep., 32.

[1547] _Falk_ v. _Howell_ (1888), 37 Fed. Rep., 202.

[1548] _Gilmore_ v. _Anderson_ (1889), 38 Fed. Rep., 846.

[1549] (1839), 1 Story, 11; see _Story_ v. _Holcombe_ (1847), 4 M'L., 306; _Folsom_ v. _Marsh_ (1841), 2 Story, 100, 116.

[1550] Gifford, J., in _Lawrence_ v. _Dana_ (1869), 4 Giff., 82; see Story, J., in _Folsom_ v. _Marsh_ (1841), 2 Story, p. 106; _Story_ v. _Holcombe_ (1847), 4 M'L., at p. 309.

[1551] _Lawrence_ v. _Dana_ (1869), 4 Cliff., p. 78; _Story_ v. _Holcombe_ (1847), 4 M'L., 309; _Folsom_ v. _Marsh_ (1841), 2 Story, 106; _Gray_ v. _Russell_ (1839), 1 Story, 11; _Stowe_ v. _Thomas_ (1853), 2 Wall. Jr., p. 547; _Keene_ v. _Wheatley_ (1860), 9 Am. L. R., 45.

[1552] (1847), 4 M'L., 306.

[1553] _Story_ v. _Holcombe_ (1847), 4 M'L., 308, 309.

[1554] (1869), 4 Cliff., 78.

[1555] _Lawrence_ v. _Dana_ (1869), 4 Cliff., pp. 78, 79.

[1556] Act of March 3, 1891, sec. 1.

[1557] Act of July 18, 1870; Revised Statutes, 1874, sec. 4952.

[1558] _Stowe_ v. _Thomas_ (1853), 2 Wall. Jr., 547.

[1559] Act of March 3, 1891, sec. 1.

[1560] Act of Congress, Aug. 18, 1856.

[1561] (1868), 6 Blatchf., 256, at p. 264.

[1562] (1868), 6 Blatchf., at p. 264.

[1563] _Brady_ v. _Daly_ (1899), 175 U. S. Rep., 148; _Daly_ v. _Webster_ (1892), 1 U. S. App., 573.

[1564] See _Carte_ v. _Duff_ (1885), 25 Fed. Rep., 183.

[1565] Act of 1891, sec. 7, amending Revised Statutes, sec. 4964.

[1566] Act of March 2, 1895, amending Revised Statutes, sec. 4965, and Act of 1891, sec. 8.

[1567] It has been suggested that this division of penalties applies only to "paintings, statues, and statuary." _Thornton_ v. _Schreiber_ (1887), 7 How., 8 Sup. Ct., 618.

[1568] _Taylor_ v. _Gilman_ (1885), 24 Fed. Rep., 632.

[1569] _Bennett_ v. _Boston_ (1900), 101 Fed., Rep., 445.

[1570] Act of Jan. 6, 1897, amending Revised Statutes, sec. 4966.

[1571] _Chapman_ v. _Ferry_ (1882), 12 Fed. Rep., 693.

[1572] _Stevens_ v. _Gladding_ (1854), 17 How., 447; _Falk_ v. _Gast_ (1893), 54 Fed. Rep., 890; _Belford_ v. _Scribner_ (1892), 144 U. S. Rep., 488; _Chapman_ v. _Ferry_ (1882), 12 Fed. Rep., 693.

[1573] _West_ v. _Lawyers_ (1894), 64 Fed. Rep., 360; _Belford_ v. _Scribner_ (1892), 144 U. S. Rep., 488; _Farmer_ v. _Elstner_ (1888), 33 Fed. Rep., 494.

[1574] _Callaghan_ v. _Myers_ (1888), 128 U. S. Rep., 617; _Lawrence_ v. _Dana_ (1869), 4 Cliff., 85; _Elizabeth_ v. _Pavement Co._ (1877), 97 U. S. Rep., 126, 139.

[1575] _Callaghan_ v. _Myers_ (1888), 128 U. S. Rep., 617.

[1576] Ibid.

[1577] _Gilmore_ v. _Anderson_ (1890), 42 Fed. Rep., 267.

[1578] _Daly_ v. _Brady_ (1895), 69 Fed. Rep., 285; _Atwill_ v. _Ferrett_ (1846), 2 Blatchf., 39; Revised Statutes, sec. 860.

[1579] _Taylor_ v. _Gilman_ (1885), 24 Fed. Rep., 632; _Johnson_ v. _Donaldson_ (1880), 3 Fed. Rep., 22; _Chapman_ v. _Ferry_ (1882), 12 Fed. Rep., 693.

[1580] _Thornton_ v. _Schreiber_ (1887), 7 How., at p. 614; _Springer_ v. _Falk_ (1894), 20 U. S. App., 296.

[1581] _Falk_ v. _Heffron_ (1893), 56 Fed. Rep., 299.

[1582] Ibid.

[1583] Revised Statutes, sec. 4965.

[1584] _Bolles_ v. _Outing_ (1899), 77 Fed. Rep., 966; _Reed_ v. _Carusi_ (1845), 72 Fed. Cas., No. 11, 642; _Backus_ v. _Gould_ (1849), 7 How., 798; _Thornton_ v. _Schreiber_ (1887), 124 U. S. Rep., 612; _Falk_ v. _Curtis_ (1901), 107 Fed. Rep., 126; (1900), 98 Fed. Rep., 989; _Child_ v. _New York Times_ (1901), 110 Fed. Rep., 527.

[1585] _Falk_ v. _Curtis_ (1900), 100 Fed. Rep., 77.

[1586] _Thornton_ v. _Schreiber_ (1887), 124 U. S. Rep., 612.

[1587] _Chapman_ v. _Ferry_ (1882), 12 Fed. Rep., 693.

[1588] Previous demand is not a condition precedent; _Hegemen_ v. _Springer_ (1901), 110 Fed. Rep., 374.

[1589] _Rogers_ v. _Jewett_ (1858), 12 L. R., 339.

[1590] _Sarony_ v. _Ehrich_ (1886), 28 Fed. Rep., 79.

[1591] See _Williams_ v. _Smythe_ (1901), 110 Fed. Rep., 961.

[1592] _Harper_ v. _Holman_ (1897), 84 Fed. Rep., 224; _Colliery_ v. _Schools_ (1899), 24 Fed. Rep., 152; _Little_ v. _Gould_ (1851), 2 Blatchf., at p. 184.

[1593] _Hubbard_ v. _Thompson_ (1882), 14 Fed. Rep., 689; _Trow_ v. _Boyd_ (1899), 97 Fed. Rep., 586.

[1594] _Reed_ v. _Holliday_ (1884), 19 Fed. Rep., 325; _Black_ v. _Allen_ (1893), 56 Fed. Rep., 764.

[1595] _Daly_ v. _Palmer_ (1868), 6 Blatchf., 256.

[1596] _Stuart_ v. _Smith_ (1895), 68 Fed. Rep., 189.

[1597] _Falk_ v. _Curtis_ (1900), 98 Fed. Rep., 989.

[1598] _Belford_ v. _Scribner_ (1892), 144 U. S. Rep., 488.

[1599] _Fishel_ v. _Lueckel_ (1892), 53 Fed. Rep., 499.

[1600] _Trow_ v. _Boyd_ (1899), 97 Fed. Rep., 586.

[1601] _Taylor_ v. _Gilman_ (1885), 24 Fed. Rep., 632.

[1602] _McDonald_ v. _Hearst_ (1899), 95 Fed. Rep., 656.

[1603] _Thornton_ v. _Schreiber_ (1887), 7 How., at p. 614; _Springer_ v. _Falk_(1894), 20 U. S. App., 296.

[1604] Revised Statutes, sec. 4968.

[1605] _Wheeler_ v. _Cobbey_ (1895), 70 Fed. Rep., 487; _Daly_ v. _Brady_ (1895), 69 Fed. Rep., 285; see _Brady_ v. _Daly_ (1899), 175 U. S. Rep., at p. 158.

[1606] _Black_ v. _Allen_ (1893), 56 Fed. Rep., 764.

[1607] _Hill_ v. _Epley_ (1858), 31 Perm. St., 331; _Lawrence_ v. _Dana_ (1869), 4 Cliff., 83; _Heine_ v. _Appleton_ (1853), 4 Blatchf., 125; _Menendez_ v. _Holt_ (1888), 128 U. S., 514; _Keene_ v. _Clarke_ (1867), 5 Robertson, N. Y., 38, 66, 67.

[1608] _Boucicault_ v. _Wood_ (1867), 2 Biss., 34.

[1609] _Falk_ v. _Schumacher_ (1891), 48 Fed. Rep., 232.

[1610] Ibid.

[1611] _Scribner_ v. _Allen_ (1892), 49 Fed. Rep., 854.

[1612] Revised Statutes, sec. 4969; sec. 914; see _Johnston_ v. _Klopsch_ (1898), 88 Fed. Rep., 692.

[1613] Revised Statutes, sec. 4963, amended Act, March 3, 1897.

[1614] _Ross_ v. _Raphael Tuck_ (1898), 91 Fed. Rep., 128.

[1615] _Rosenbach_ v. _Dreyfus_ (1880), 2 Fed. Rep., 217.

[1616] _Taft_ v. _Stephens_ (1889), 39 Fed. Rep., 781.

[1617] _Rigney_ v. _Raphael Tuck_ (1896), 77 Fed. Rep., 173.

[1618] _Rigney_ v. _Dalton_ (1896), 77 Fed. Rep., 176.

[1619] Ibid.

[1620] _Hoertel_ v. _Raphael Tuck_ (1899), 94 Fed. Rep., 844.

[1621] _Rigney_ v. _Dalton_ (1896), 77 Fed. Rep., 176.

[1622] Revised Statutes, sec. 4956, amended March 3, 1891, 26 S. L., 1107.

[1623] 26 S. L., 604.

[1624] 26 S. L., 604.

[1625] Ibid.

[1626] Ibid.

[1627] Ibid.

[1628] Revised Statute, sec. 4956, amended March 3, 1891, 26 S. L., 694.

[1629] Ibid.

[1630] _Wheaton_ v. _Peters_ (1834), 8 Pet., 591; _Banks_ v. _Manchester_ (1888), 128 U. S. Rep., 244; _Jewellers'_ v. _Jewellers'_ (1898), 155 N. Y., 241; _Holmes_ v. _Hurst_ (1898), 174 U. S. Rep., 82; _Palmer_ v. _De Witt_ (1872), 47 N. Y., 532; _West_ v. _Lawyers_ (1896), 64 Fed. Rep., 360; _Parton_ v. _Prang_ (1872), 3 Cliff., 537; _Merrell_ v. _Tice_ (1881), 104 U. S. Rep., 557; _Boucicault_ v. _Hart_ (1875), 13 Blatchf., 47; _Boucicault_ v. _Fox_ (1862), 5 Blatchf., 87; _Boucicault_ v. _Wood_ (1867), 7 Am. L. R., 550; 2 Bis., 34; _Daly_ v. _Walrath_ (1899), 40 App. Div. N. Y., 220; _Carte_ v. _Ford_ (1883), 15 Fed. Rep., 439; _Carte_ v. _Duff_ (1885), 25 Fed. Rep., 183; _Rees_ v. _Peltzer_ (1874), 75 Ill., 475; _Ewer_ v. _Coxe_ (1824), 4 Wash. C. C., 487.

[1631] _Boucicault_ v. _Hart_ (1875), 13 Blatchf., 47; _Daly_ v. _Walrath_ (1899), 40 App. Div. N. Y., 220; _Carte_ v. _Ford_ (1883), 15 Fed. Rep., 439; _Carte_ v. _Duff_ (1885), 25 Fed. Rep., 183.

[1632] _M'Lean_ v. _Fleming_ (1877), 96 U. S. Rep., 245; _Estes_ v. _Williams_ (1884), 21 Fed. Rep., 189; _Social Register_ v. _Howard_ (1894), 60 Fed. Rep., 270.

[1633] _Harper_ v. _Holman_ (1897), 84 Fed. Rep., 224.

[1634] _Social Register_ v. _Howard_ (1894), 60 Fed. Rep., 270.

[1635] _Estes_ v. _Williams_ (1884), 21 Fed. Rep., 189; _Estes_ v. _Leslie_ (1886), 27 Fed. Rep., 22.

[1636] _Aronson_ v. _Fleckenstein_ (1886), 28 Fed. Rep., 75.

[1637] _Merriam_ v. _Holloway_ (1890), 43 Fed. Rep., 450; _Merriam_ v. _Famous Shoe_ (1891), 47 Fed. Rep., 411.

[1638] Ibid.

[1639] _Clemens_ v. _Belford_ (1883), 14 Fed. Rep., 728.

[1640] _Clemens_ v. _Belford_ (1883), 14 Fed. Rep., 728; _Drummond_ v. _Altemus_ (1894), 60 Fed. Rep., 338.

[1641] _Drummond_ v. _Altemus_ (1894), 60 Fed. Rep., 338.

[1642] _Kipling_ v. _Fenno_ (1900), 106 Fed. Rep., 692.

[1643] _Doan_ v. _American Book Co._ (1901), 105 Fed. Rep., 772.

[1644] _Merriam_ v. _Famous Shoe_ (1891), 47 Fed. Rep., 411; _Merriam_ v. _Texas Siftings_ (1892), 49 Fed. Rep., 944.

[1645] _Dodd_ v. _Smith_ (1891), 144 Pa., 340.

[1646] _Black_ v. _Ehrich_ (1891), 44 Fed. Rep., 793.

[1647] _Wheaton_ v. _Peters_ (1834), 8 Pet., 591; _Little_ v. _Hall_ (1855), 18 How., 165; _Bartlett_ v. _Crittenden_ (1847), 4 M'L., 301; _Palmer_ v. _De Witt_ (1872), 47 N. Y., 532.

[1648] _Wheaton_ v. _Peters_ (1834), 8 Pet., 591; _Jones_ v. _Thoms_ (1843), 1 N. Y. Leg. Obs., 408; _French_ v. _Maguire_ (1878), 55 How. (N. Y.) Pr., 471; _Oertel_ v. _Wood_ (1870), 40 How. Pr., 10; _Oertel_ v. _Jacoby_ (1872), 44 How., 179; _Rees_ v. _Peltzer_ (1874), 75 Ill., 475; _Crowe_ v. _Aiken_ (1870), 2 Biss., 208; _Carte_ v. _Bailey_ (1874), 64 Maine, 458.

[1649] _Wheaton_ v. _Peters_ (1834), 8 Pet., 591; _Palmer_ v. _De Witt_ (1872), 47 N. Y., 532; _Goldmark_ v. _Kreling_ (1885), 25 Fed. Rep., 349; _Daly_ v. _Walrath_ (1899), 40 App. Div. N. Y., 220; 28 Chic. Leg. News, 49.

[1650] See p. 262, _supra_.

[1651] _Parton_ v. _Prang_ (1872), 3 Cliff., 537.

[1652] See p. 263, _supra_.

[1653] _Oertel_ v. _Wood_ (1870), 40 How. Pr., 10; _Oertel_ v. _Jacoby_ (1872), 44 How. Pr., 179.

[1654] _Tompkins_ v. _Halleck_ (1882), 133 Mass., 32; overruling _Keene_ v. _Kimball_ (1860), 16 Gray, 549; see _French_ v. _Maguire_ (1878), 55 How. (N. Y.) Pr., 471; _Crowe_ v. _Aiken_ (1870), 2 Biss., 208.

[1655] _Palmer_ v. _De Witt_ (1872), 47 N. Y., 532.

[1656] Act of March 3, 1891, sec. 9, amending Revised Statutes, 4967.

[1657] _Press_ v. _Munroe_ (1896), 73 Fed. Rep., 196.

[1658] _Palmer_ v. _De Witt_ (1872), 47 N. Y., 532.

[1659] Ibid.

[1660] _Parton_ v. _Prang_ (1872), 3 Cliff., 537.

[1661] See pp. 152-4.

[1662] Repealed by the Public Authorities Protection Act, 1893 (56 & 57 Vict. c. 61).

[1663] Repealed by Stat. Law Rev. Act, 1867.

[1664] Repealed by Stat. Law Rev. Act, 1887.

[1665] Ibid.

[1666] Repealed by Stat. Law Rev. Act, 1867.

[1667] Ibid.

[1668] Repealed by The Public Authorities Protection Act, 1893.

[1669] See p. 61.

[1670] 41 Geo. III., c. 107, extends the privileges of this Act to Dublin.

[1671] See p. 61.

[1672] See p. 61.

[1673] This section is repealed by the Public Authorities Protection Act, 1893, and the provisions of that Act substituted therefor in so far as they may be held to apply.

[1674] A "full and reasonable indemnity" is substituted by 5 & 6 Vict. c. 97, sec. 2. These words in the above section printed in italics were subsequently repealed by Stat. Law Rev. Act, 1861.

[1675] See p. 161.

[1676] See p. 162.

[1677] A "full and reasonable indemnity" is substituted by 5 & 6 Vict. c. 97, sec. 2.

[1678] Repealed Stat. Law Rev. Act, 1873 (1).

[1679] Repealed Stat. Law Rev. Act, 1890 (2).

[1680] See p. 123.

[1681] See p. 139.

[1682] See p. 135.

[1683] See p. 126.

[1684] See p. 142.

[1685] A "full and reasonable indemnity" substituted by 5 & 6 Vict. c. 97, sec. 2. See p. 144.

[1686] See p. 57.

[1687] Repealed Stat. Law Rev. Act, 1890.

[1688] Repealed Stat. Law Rev. Act, 1888 (2).

[1689] 5 & 6 Vict. c. 97, sec. 2, substitutes "a full and reasonable indemnity."

[1690] Repealed Stat. Law Rev. Act 1890 (2). See p. 13.

[1691] Repealed Stat. Law Rev. Act, 1874 (2).

[1692] See p. 10.

[1693] See pp. 36, 148.

[1694] See p. 12.

[1695] See p. 123.

[1696] See p. 74.

[1697] See p. 38.

[1698] See pp. 42, 62.

[1699] Repealed Stat. Law Rev. Act, 1890 (2).

[1700] See p. 119.

[1701] Repealed Stat. Law Rev. Act, 1890 (2).

[1702] See p. 55.

[1703] See p. 56.

[1704] See pp. 47, 49-53.

[1705] See p. 53.

[1706] See p. 46.

[1707] See p. 78.

[1708] See p. 54.

[1709] Repealed Stat. Law Rev. Act, 1893 (1).

[1710] Ibid.

[1711] Ibid.

[1712] Ibid.

[1713] See p. 85.

[1714] See pp. 75, 77, 118.

[1715] See p. 92.

[1716] See p. 91.

[1717] Ibid.

[1718] See p. 66.

[1719] See p. 67.

[1720] See p. 68.

[1721] Ibid.

[1722] There may be joint employers. See p. 71.

[1723] See p. 71.

[1724] See p. 72.

[1725] See pp. 49-53.

[1726] Repealed Stat. Law Rev. Act, 1890 (2).

[1727] See p. 131.

[1728] See p. 67.

[1729] See p. 131.

[1730] See p. 135.

[1731] See p. 89.

[1732] See p. 47.

[1733] See p. 133.

[1734] The whole of section 26 is repealed by the Public Authorities Protection Act, 1893, in so far as that Act applies. The result is probably that the first part of the section, printed in italics, is entirely repealed. The second part of the section is probably not repealed except in respect of actions against a person or body for acts done in performance of a public duty.

[1735] See p. 91.

[1736] Repealed Stat. Law Rev. Act, 1874.

[1737] Repealed Stat. Law Rev. Act, 1891.

[1738] Repealed Stat. Law Rev. Act, 1874 (2).

[1739] Repealed International Copyright Act, 1886, sec. 12.

[1740] Ibid.

[1741] Ibid.

[1742] See pp. 41, 128, 151, 162, 168.

[1743] Repealed Stat. Law Rev. Act, 1874 (2).

[1744] Usually known as The Foreign Reprints Act. See p. 187.

[1745] Repealed Stat. Law Rev. Act, 1891.

[1746] Repealed Stat. Law Rev. Act, 1875.

[1747] Repealed; Patents, Designs, and Trade Marks Act, 1883.

[1748] Ibid.

[1749] Works produced in the following countries received protection under this Act. The dates appended are the dates of the respective Orders in Council: France, Order in Council, dispensed with; Prussia, Oct. 19, 1855; Belgium, Feb. 8, 1855; Italy, Sept. 9, 1865; Sardinia, Feb. 4, 1861; Spain, Sept. 24, 1857; Nov. 20, 1880.

[1750] Secs. I.-V. repealed; Int. Copyright Act, 1886, sec. 12.

[1751] Sec. VIII. is repealed: Int. Cop. Act, 1886, sec. 12.

[1752] See p. 170.

[1753] See p. 167.

[1754] See p. 181.

[1755] See p. 174.

[1756] See p. 175.

[1757] See p. 171.

[1758] See p. 179.

[1759] Ibid.

[1760] See p. 180.

[1761] Repealed Stat. Law Rev. Act, 1893 (1).

[1762] Ibid.

[1763] See p. 178.

[1764] Repealed Stat. Law Rev. Act, 1893 (2).

[1765] See p. 188.

[1766] Repealed Stat. Law Rev. Act, 1893 (2).

[1767] See p. 91.

[1768] Repealed Stat. Law Rev. Act, 1898.

[1769] See p. 131.

[1770] Repealed Copyright (Musical Compositions) Act, 1888.

[1771] Repealed Stat. Law Rev. Act, 1898.

[1772] See p. 197.

[1773] See pp. 40, 187, 191; 7 & 8 Vict. c. 12, sec. 19.

[1774] See p. 186.

[1775] Repealed Stat. Law Rev. Act, 1898.

[1776] See p. 144.

[1777] See p. 201.

[1778] Those portions of the Convention printed in italics have been altered by the Additional Act of Paris, 1896. Norway, although a signatory of the Convention, has not acceded to the Additional Act.

[1779] See paragraph 2 of Final Protocol.

[1780] See paragraph 4 of Final Protocol.

[1781] See paragraph 5 of Final Protocol.

[1782] The following countries subsequently acceded to the Berne Convention and joined the Copyright Union. By various Orders in Council of the respective dates given hereunder the provisions of the International Copyright Acts and of the above Order in Council were extended to the acceding countries, viz.:

Luxembourg, August 10, 1888; Monaco, October 15, 1889; Montenegro, May 11, 1893; Norway, August 1, 1896; Japan, August 8, 1899.

Montenegro subsequently seceded August 9, 1899.

[1783] All the Orders in Council under the International Copyright Acts, 1844 and 1852.

[1784] The following countries subsequently acceded to the Additional Act of Paris. By Orders in Council of the respective dates given hereunder the provisions of the above Order in Council are extended to the acceding countries, viz.:

Haiti, May 19, 1898; Japan, August 8, 1899. Montenegro subsequently seceded August 9, 1899.

[1785] See p. 60.

[1786] Not to include labels. Act of Congress, June 18, 1874, sec. 3.

[1787] Amended section substituted by Act of Congress, March 3, 1891, sec. 1.

[1788] Amended section substituted by Act of Congress, March 3, 1891, sec. 2.

[1789] Omission to deposit copies, description, or photographs within the prescribed time could have been rectified by deposit before March 1, 1893: Act of Congress, March 3, 1893.

[1790] Amended section substituted by Act of Congress, March 3, 1891, sec. 3.

[1791] _Amended Act of Congress, June_ 18, 1874, _sec. 2._

[1792] Amended section substituted by Act of Congress, March 3, 1891, sec. 4.

[1793] Amended section substituted by Act of Congress, March 3, 1891, sec. 5.

[1794] Act of Congress, June 18, 1874, substitutes "upon some visible portion thereof, or of the substance upon which the same shall be mounted." Act of Congress, August 1, 1882, provides that in the case of designs for decorative articles the notice may be put on the back or bottom, &c.

[1795] Act of Congress, June 18, 1874, provides an alternative form of notice.

[1796] _Amended section substituted by Act of Congress, March 3, 1891, sec. 6._ Further amended section substituted by Act of Congress, March 3, 1897.

[1797] Amended section substituted by Act of Congress, March 3, 1891, sec. 7.

[1798] _Amended section substituted by Act of Congress, March 3, 1891, sec. 8._ Further amended section substituted by Act of Congress, March 2, 1895.

[1799] Amended section substituted by Act of Congress, January 6, 1897.

[1800] Amended section substituted by Act of Congress, March 3, 1891, sec. 9.

[1801] Repealed by Act of Congress, March 3, 1891, sec. 10.

[1802] Superseded by Act of Congress, March 3, 1891, sec. 4.

[1803] Omission to deposit copies, description, or photographs within the prescribed time could have been rectified by deposit before March 1, 1893: Act of Congress, March 3, 1893.

[1804] Amended section substituted by Act of Congress, March 3, 1897.

[1805] Amended section substituted by Act of Congress, March 2, 1895.

[Transcriber's Note:

Inconsistent spelling as in the original.

Punctuation normalised throughout.]