Skip to content

Chapter XVIII

Text size

THE MORAL RELATIONS OF PERSONS HOLDING THE "PER SE"
DOCTRINE ON THE SUBJECT OF SLAVERY, TO THE PURCHASE
AND CONSUMPTION OF SLAVE LABOR PRODUCTS.

Moral relations of Slavery; Relations of the
consumer of Slave labor products to the system;
Grand error of all Anti-Slavery effort: Law of
_particeps criminis_; Daniel O'Connell; _Malum in
se_ doctrine; Inconsistency of those who hold it;
English Emancipationists; Their commercial
argument; Differences between the position of Great
Britain and the United States; Preaching versus
practice by Abolitionists; Cause of their want of
influence over the Slaveholder; Necessity of
examining the question; Each man to be judged by
his own standard; Classification of opinions in the
United States, in regard to the morality of
Slavery; Three Views; A case in illustration;
Apology of _per se_ men for using Slave grown
products insufficient; Law relating to "confusion
of goods;" _per se_ men _participes criminis_ with
Slaveholder; Taking Slave grown products under
_protest_ absurd; World's Christian Evangelical
Alliance; Amount of Slave labor Cotton in England
at that moment; Pharisaical conduct; The Scotchman
taking his wife under protest; Anecdote; American
Cotton more acceptable to Englishmen than
Republican principles; Secret of England's policy
toward American Slavery; The case of robbery again
cited, and the English Satirized; A contrast;
Causes of the want of moral power of Abolitionists;
Slaveholder no cause to cringe; Other results;
Effect of the adoption of the _per se_ doctrine by
ecclesiastical bodies; Slaves thus left in all
their moral destitution; Inconsistency of _per se_
men denouncing others; What the Bible says of
similar conduct. 203

Conclusion. 215

Comments

Log in to leave a comment.

Cotton is king, and pro-slavery argumentsChapter XVIII

0%1 min left in chapter