The passing of the great race; or, The racial basis of European history

Chapter XIV: The Aryan Language in Asia

Text size

253 : 1. See p. 158 and note. Also Peake, 2, p. 165; Breasted, 1, p. 176; Von Luschan, pp. 241–243; Zaborowski, 1, p. 112; DeLapouge, 1, p. 252, says: “Aryans were in India about 1500 B. C.”

253 : 10. See Peake, 2; also pp. 170–171 and 213 of this book.

253 : 13. See the note to p. 225 : 11.

253 : 13–15. Eduard Meyer, _Zur ältesten Geschichte der Iranier_.

253 : 16 _seq._ See the note to p. 239 : 16 seq.

253 : 19. Zaborowski, 1, pp. 137 and 214.

254 : 1. See pp. 173 and 225 of this book.

254 : 3 _seq._ For Sacæ see the note to p. 259 : 21. Cahun, _Histoire de l’Asie_, says on p. 35: “The Sacæ and the Ephtalites and Massagetæ were from the Kiptchak.” See also Zaborowski, 1, pp. 94, 100–101, 215 _seq._

254 : 6. Massagetæ. See the note to p. 259 : 21.

254 : 8. Ephtalites, or White Huns. Cahun, _Histoire de l’Asie_, pp. 43–55: “The Turks destroyed in the first half of the seventh century a powerful nation, the Ephtalites of Soghdiana, north of Persia. They were called Ephtalites, or White Huns or Tie-le-urn Turks.” See also the notes to pp. 119 : 15 and 224 : 3 of this book, and chap. XXVI in Gibbon on the Huns in general.

Procopius, vol. I, says in speaking of the Ephtalite Huns and describing their war with the Persians about 450 A. D.: “The White Huns are of the stock of the Huns in fact as well as in name, living in the territory north of Persia, and are settlers on the land in contrast to the Nomadic Huns who live at a distance.... They are the only ones among the Huns who have white bodies and countenances that are not ugly and they are far more civilized than are the other Huns.” The general impression gained from Procopius is that they were not true Huns. “Massagetæ” is used as another name for Huns by Procopius. He describes them as mounted bowmen. It is clear that in using this name he refers to Huns only.

254 : 13. Medes. The name Medes is variously applied by different authorities; by many the Medes are regarded as a branch of the Persians, one of two kindred tribes of Nordics. The author follows Zaborowski in applying the name to the round skulled population which was conquered by the Persians. See Zaborowski, 1, chaps. V and VI, especially part II and p. 125. Also Herodotus in the references given for Persia. Hall, _Ancient History of the Near East_, p. 459, gives an interesting bit of their story.

254 : 15. Persians. The Persians were a branch of Nordics who invaded the territory of the round skulled Medes, and gradually imposed their language and much of their culture on the subjugated populations. See Herodotus, book I, especially 55, 71, 72, 74, 91, 95, 101, 107, 125, 129, 135, 136; and book VI, 19, where he discusses both Medes and Persians. For modern commentary the author follows Zaborowski, 1, pp. 138–139, 153 _seq._, chap. VI, and also pp. 212–214.

Von Luschan, pp. 233–234, describes the present day Persians, showing that there has been a resurgence of types and that the Nordic elements have been largely absorbed by the original inhabitants. He adds, however, on p. 234, that while he never saw Persians with light hair and blue eyes, he was told that in some noble families fair types were not very rare.

254 : 19. See the note on the Medes, and Zaborowski, p. 156, on the Magi.

254 : 26. Darius. Zaborowski, 1, p. 12. Herodotus, I, 209, says: “Now Hystaspes the son of Arsames was of the race of the Achæmenidæ and his eldest son Darius was at that time twenty years old.” Another name for Hystaspes was Vashtaspa, whose father was Arsames (Arsháma). He traced his descent through four ancestors to Achæmenes (Hakhámamish).

Von Luschan, p. 241, says: “Nothing is known of the Achæmenides who called themselves ‘Aryans of Aryan stock’ and who brought the Aryan language to Persia. About 1500 B. C. or earlier, there seems to have begun a migration of northern men to Asia Minor, Syria, Persia, Egypt and India. Indeed we can now connect even Further India with the Mitanni of central Asia Minor.”

See Zaborowski in regard to the Behistun tablet, etc., although practically any writers on Persia and Mesopotamia discuss this great monument.

255 : 2. Zaborowski, 1, pp. 116–117.

255 : 6. See the note on the Medic language, 255 : 13. Also Zaborowski, 1, pp. 34, 182–184.

255 : 7 _seq._ Zaborowski, 1, pp. 180–184; Feist, 5, p. 423.

255 : 13. Bactria and Zendic. See the notes to pp. 119 : 15 and 257 : 12.

255 : 13. Zendic or the Medic language. See Zaborowski, 1, chap. VI. According to the Census of India, vol. I, pp. 291 _seq._, both Persian and Medic tongues belong to the Aryan stock. They are divided in the following table:

Zaborowski, 1, p. 146, positively identifies Medic as agglutinative, in which he agrees with Oppert. See chaps. V and VI, especially part II and p. 125. For early data on the Medes see the Herodotus references given under Persia. Zaborowski says, p. 121, that Medic was spoken until 600 B. C.

255 : 15. Kurdish. Von Luschan, p. 229: “The Kurds speak an Aryan language.... The eastern Kurds are little known.... They speak a different dialect from the western tribes, but both divisions are Aryan.” On the Kurds as a people, see the notes to p. 225 : 20.

255 : 20. Zaborowski, 1, p. 216–217.

255 : 23. Von Luschan, p. 234, and the note to p. 225 : 19 of this book.

255 : 26–256 : 10. See Plutarch’s _Life of Alexander_; _Historia Alexandri Magni de præliis_; Zaborowski, 1, p. 171.

256 : 3. Alexander the Great and the Persians. Plutarch, _Life of Alexander_: “After this he accommodated himself more than ever to the manners of the Asiatics, and at the same time persuaded them to adopt some of the Macedonian fashions, for by a mixture of both he thought a union might be promoted much better than by force, and his authority maintained when he was at a distance. For the same reason he selected 30,000 boys and gave them masters to instruct them in the Grecian literature as well as to train them to arms in the Macedonian manner. As for his marriage with Roxana, it was entirely the effect of love.... Nor was the match unsuitable to the situation of his affairs. The barbarians placed greater confidence in him on account of that alliance.... Hephæstion and Craternus were his two favorites. The former praised the Persian fashions and dressed as he did; the latter adhered to the fashions of his own country. He therefore employed Hephæstion in his transactions with the barbarians and Craternus to signify his pleasure to the Greeks and Macedonians.”

256 : 11 _seq._ Armenians. Ridgeway, 1, p. 396, speaking of language, says: “That the Armenians were an offshoot of the Phrygians as mentioned in Herodotus VII, 73, is proved by the most modern linguistic results, which show that Armenian comes closer to Greek than to the Iranian tongues.” _Cf._ also Hall, _Ancient History of the Near East_, p. 475. This need not imply racial affinity, however. The following notes on Armenian were contributed by Mr. Leon Dominian: “The proof of Aryan affinities in the Hittite language has not yet been established. The great difficulty in establishing the pre-Aryan relation of Armenian is due to the fact that the earliest text dates only from the fifth century A. D.

“The Cimmerians and Scythians, coming from southern Europe by way of the Caucasus (Herodotus, IV, 11, 12), reached Armenia about 720 B. C. (see Garstang, _The Land of the Hittites_, p. 62). The old Vannic language antedating this invasion resembles the Georgian of the Caucasus, according to Sayce (_Jour. Roy. As. Soc._, XIV, p. 410), who has studied the local inscriptions. On p. 409 he infers that the Aryan occupation of Armenia was coeval with the victory of Aryanism in Persia at the end of the sixth century, B. C.

“The fact that Armenia is linguistically related to the western groups of the Indo-European languages and that the Persian element consists of loan words is corroborated by geographical evidence. The Armenian highland culminating in the 17000 foot altitude of Mt. Ararat has acted as a barrier dividing the plateau of Anatolia from that of Iran. Herodotus called the Armenians the ‘beyond’ Phrygians.” See also O. Schrader, Jevons translation, p. 430.

256 : 14 _seq._ Phrygians. See the note to p. 225.

256 : 15. Félix Sartiaux, _Troie, la guerre de Troie_, pp. 5–9.

256 : 16–17. See the note to p. 239 : 2 _seq._

256 : 21 _seq._ See the table of languages to p. 242 : 5.

256 : 27–257 : 7. See pp. 20, 134, 238–239, of this book.

257 : 12. Bactria. See the note to p. 119 : 15.

257 : 16 _seq._ See the notes to pp. 158 and 253. Also Von Luschan, p. 243; Zaborowski, 1, p. 112; and the Indian Census, 1901, vol. I, p. 294.

257 : 19. Punjab. _Panch_—five, _ab_—river, in Hindustani. _Cf._ the Greek _penta_—five.

257 : 22. Dravidians. See pp. 148–149 of this book.

257 : 23. See the note to. p. 259 : 21 and Zaborowski, 1, pp. 113 seq.

257 : 28–258 : 2. See the note to p. 242 : 5. George Turnour’s edition in 1836, of the Mahavamsa, first made it possible to trace Sinhalese history and to prove that about the middle of the sixth century B. C. a band of Aryan-speaking people from India, under Vijaya conquered and settled Ceylon permanently. There are a number of later works on Ceylon, dealing with its archæology, flora, fauna, history, etc.

According to the British Indian Census of 1901 nearly two-thirds of the inhabitants of Assam were Hindus, and the language of Hinduism has become that of the province. The vernacular Assamese is closely related to Bengali. E. A. Gait has written a _History of Assam_ (1906).

258 : 3. See the notes to pp. 158 and 253 of this book.

258 : 8. Zaborowski, 1, pp. 184–185. Compare de Morgan’s dates with those of Zaborowski, the Indian Census and Meillet.

258 : 19. See Meillet, _Introduction á l’étude des langues européens_. On p. 37 he claims that the relation between the two is comparable to that prevailing between High and Low German. Zaborowski, 1, p. 184, says: “The language of the Avesta, the Zend, is a contemporary dialect of the Persian of Darius (_i. e._, of Old Persian), from whence has come the Pehlevi and its very close relative. It even presents the closest affinities with the Sanskrit of the Vedas, from which was derived, in the time of Alexander, classical Sanskrit. This Sanskrit of the Vedas is itself so close to Old Persian that it can be said that one and the other are only two pronunciations of the same tongue.” See also the Indian Census for 1901, vol. I, p. 294.

258 : 25 _seq._ Zaborowski, 1, pp. 213–216; Peake, 2, pp. 165 _seq._ and especially pp. 169 and 172.

259 : 4. Ellsworth Huntington, _The Pulse of Asia_; Peake, 2, p. 170; and Breasted, _passim_.

259 : 9. See pp. 173, 237, 253–254 and 257 of this book.

259 : 16. See the notes to pp. 119 : 13 and 255 : 7.

259 : 21. Sacæ or Saka. The Sacæ or Saka were the blond peoples who carried the Aryan language to India. Strabo, 511, allies them with the Scythians as one of their tribes. Many tribes were called Sacæ, especially by the Hindus, who used the term indiscriminately to designate any northern invaders of India.

One tribe gained the most fertile tract in Armenia which was called Sacasene, after them.

Zaborowski, 1, p. 94, relates the Sacæ with the Scythians, and says: “The Tadjiks are a people composed of suppressed elements where blonds are found in an important minority. These blonds, saving an atavistic survival of more ancient or sporadic characters I can identify. They are the Sacæ.” He continues, in a note, that a great error has been committed on the subject of the Sacæ. “Repeating an assertion of Alfred Maury, whose very sound erudition enjoyed a merited reputation, I myself once repeated that the Sacæ who figures on the rock of Behistun was of the Kirghiz type. This assertion is completely erroneous. I have proved it and can say that the Sacæ and the Scythians were identical.”

Zaborowski, p. 216, also identifies the Sacæ with the Persians. On this whole subject see Herodotus, VII, 64; also Feist, 5.

259 : 21. Massagetæ. Zaborowski, 1, p. 285, says: “The first information of history concerning the peoples of Turkestan refers to the Massagetæ, whose life was exactly the same as that of the Scythians (Herodotus, I, 205–216). They enjoyed a developed industrial civilization while they remained nomads. They were doubtless composed of ethnic elements different from the Scythians, but probably already spoke the Iranian tongue, like them. And since the time of Darius, at least, there were in Turkestan with them and beside them, Sacæ, whom the Greeks have always regarded as Scythians come from Europe.”

Minns, _Scythians and Greeks_, p. 11, says: “The Scyths and the Massagetæ were contemporaneous and different. The Massagetæ are evidently a mixed collection of tribes without an ethnic unity; the variety of their customs and states of culture shows this and Herodotus does not seem to suggest that they are all one people. They are generally reckoned to be Iranian.... The picture drawn of the nomad Massagetæ seems very like that of the Scythians in a rather ruder stage of development.”

Herodotus, I, 215, describes them as follows: “In their dress and mode of living the Massagetæ resemble the Scythians. They fight both on horseback and on foot, neither method is strange to them.... The following are some of their customs,—each man has but one wife, yet all wives are held in common; for this is a custom of the Massagetæ and not of the Scythians, as the Greeks wrongly say. Human life does not come to its natural close with this people; but when a man grows very old, all his kinsfolk collect together and offer him up in sacrifice; offering at the same time some cattle also. After the sacrifice they boil the flesh and feast on it; and those who thus end their days are reckoned the happiest. If a man dies of disease they do not eat him, but bury him in the ground, bewailing his ill fortune that he did not come to be sacrificed. They sow no grain, but live on their herds and on fish, of which there is great plenty in the Araxes. Milk is what they chiefly drink. [_Cf._ the eastern Siberian tribes of the present day.] The only god they worship is the sun, and to him they offer the horse in sacrifice, under the notion of giving to the swiftest of the gods, the swiftest of all mortal creatures.”

D’Arbois de Jubainville, 4, t. I, p. 231 declares they were the same as the Scyths.

Horse sacrifices are said to prevail among the modern Parses. On the whole, the Massagetæ appear to have been largely Nordic.

259 : 24. Kirghizes. See Zaborowski, 1, pp. 216, 290–291.

259 : 25 _seq._ See the note to p. 119 : 15.

260 : 3. Gibbon, chap. LXIV. Also called the battle of Lignitz. Lignitz is the duchy, and Wahlstatt a small village on the battlefield.

260 : 8. See the notes to pp. 224 : 3 and 259 : 21.

260 : 17. Feist, 5, pp. 1, 427–431, says the Tokharian is related to the western rather than to the Iranian-Indian group of languages, and places the Tokhari in northeast Turkestan. (See the note to p. 119 : 13.) On p. 471 he identifies the Yuë-Tchi and Khang with Aryans from Chinese Turkestan, basing himself on Chinese annals, the date being given as 800 B. C. _Cf._ also the notes to p. 224 : 3 of this book.

260 : 21. See DeLapouge, 1, p. 248; Feist, 5, p. 520.

260 : 29–261 : 5. See Feist, above, in the note to 260 : 17.

261 : 6. Traces. See the note to p. 70 : 12.

261 : 17. Deniker, 2, pp. 407 _seq._; G. Elliot Smith, _Ancient Egyptians_, p. 61; Ripley, p. 450.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Abercromby, J. _Bronze Age Pottery_, 1912.

Alsina, Juan A. _European Immigration to the Argentine_, 1898.

Appian of Alexandria:
1. _De Rebus Hispaniensibus._
2. _De Bello Annibalico._
3. _Appian’s Roman History_, with an English translation by Horace
White, 2 vols. London, Wm. Heinemann; New York, Macmillan,
1912–1913.
4. _Appiani Historia Romana._ Edidit Ludovicus Mendelssohn. Lipsiæ,
Trübner, 1878–1881.

Arbois de Jubainville, M. H. d’:
1. “Les Celts en Espagne,” _Revue Celtique_, vols. XIV and XV.
2. “Les Celts et les langues celtiques,” _Revue archéologique, série
2_, t. XLIII, pp. 87–96, 141–155.
3. “Les Gaulois dans l’Italie du Nord,” _Rev. Celt._, vol. XI.
4. _Les premiers habitants de l’Europe._

Avebury, Lord (Sir John Lubbock). _Prehistoric Times_, 7th ed. New
York, Henry Holt & Co.; London, Williams and Norgate, 1864–1913.

Avienus, Rufius Festus. _Ora maritima._

Bannwarth, E. See Studer.

Bassanovitch, I. _Materials on the Anthropology of the Bulgars: The
Lomsk District_, pp. 3–186. 1891.

Beddoe, John:
1. _The Anthropological History of Europe._ 1893.
2. “The Kelts of Ireland,” _Journal of Anthropology_, 1870–1871, pp.
117–131.
3. “On the Stature and Bulk of Man in the British Isles,” _Memoirs of
the Anthropological Society_, vol. III, pp. 384–573, London,
1867–1869.
4. _The Races of Britain._ Bristol and London, 1885.
5. _Scottish Review_, vol. XIX, 1892.

Belloc, H. _The Old Road._ London, Constable & Co., 1911.

Bertrand, Alexandre. (With S. Reinach.) _Les Celts dans les vallées du
Pô et du Danube._ Paris, E. Leroux, 1894.

Binder, Julius. _Die Plebs._ Leipsig, G. Bohme, Deichert, 1909.

Boas, F.:
1. _Changes in the Bodily Form of the Descendants of Immigrants._
Document 208. Washington, D. C., Government Printing Office, 1911.
2. “Modern Populations of America,” _19th International Congress of
Americanists_, pp. 569 _seq._, 1915. Washington, D. C.

Boni, G. Roma. _Notizie degli Scavi_; série 5, pp. 123 _seq._ and 375
_seq._, 1903.

Bork, Ferdinand. _Die Mitanni Sprache._ Berlin, W. Peiser, 1909.

Botsford, George Willis. _The Roman Assemblies._ Macmillan, 1909.

Boule, M.:
1. “Essai de paléontologie stratigraphique de l’homme,” _Revue
d’anthropologie_, série 3, t. III, pp. 129–144, 272–297, 385–411,
647–680. 1888.
2. “La taille et les proportions du corps de l’homo
neanderthalensis,” _Compte-Rendue, Inst. franc. anth._, pp. 57–60.
1912.
3. Various writings.

Breasted, James H.:
1. _Ancient Times, A History of the Early World._ Boston, Ginn & Co.,
1916.
2. “The Origins of Civilization,” _Scientific Monthly_, vols. IX,
nos. 4, 5, 6, and X, nos. 1, 2, 3.
3. _A Survey of the Ancient World._ Boston, Ginn & Co., 1919.
4. _History of Egypt_ and other writings.

Breuil, L’Abbé H.:
1. “Les peintures rupestres d’Espagne,” (avec Serrano Gomez et Cabre
Aguilo), _L’Anthropologie_, t. XXIII, 1912.
2. (With Obermaier.) “Les premiers travaux de l’Institut de
Paléontologie humaine.” _L’Anthr._, t. XXIII, 1912.
3. “Les subdivisions du paléolithique supérieure et leur
signification,” _Congr. intern. d’anth. et d’arch. préhist.,
Compte-Rendue_, XIV, pp. 165–238, Sess. Genève, 1912.
4. Various writings.

Broca, Paul:
1. “Les peuples et les monuments megalithiques: les Vandals en
Afrique,” _Rev. d’Anth._, série 1, V.
2. Various writings.

Bryce, George. _The Remarkable History of the Hudson Bay Company._ New
York, Scribner, 1900.

Bryce, James. _The Holy Roman Empire._ Macmillan, 1904.

Bruhnes, Jean. “Race et nation,” _Le Correspondant_, Paris, September,
1917.

Burke, U. R. _A History of Spain_, 2d ed. London, Longmans, Green &
Co., 1900.

Burrowes, R. M. _The Discoveries in Crete._ London, J. Murray, 1907.

Bury, J. B.:
1. _A History of Greece._ Macmillan, 1917
2. _A History of the Later Roman Empire_, 2 vols. Macmillan, 1889.

Cahun, Léon. _Histoire de l’Asie._ Paris, Armand Colin et Cie., 1896.

Caldwell, Bishop R. _A Comparative Grammar of the Dravidian or South
Indian Family of Languages_, 2d ed. London, K. Paul, Trench, Trübner
& Co., 1913.

Candolle, Alphonse de. _Histoire des Sciences et des savants depuis
deux siècles_, 2me éd. Genève, H. Georg, 1806–1893.

Cartailhac, Émile.:
1. _La France préhistorique d’après les sepultures et les monuments_,
2me éd. Paris, 1903.
2. (With H. Breuil.) Various writings.

Castle, William E.:
1. _Genetics and Eugenics._ Cambridge, Harvard University Press,
1916.
2. _Heredity._ New York, D. Appleton & Co., 1911.

Cattell, J. McKeen. “A Statistical Study of American Men of Science,”
_Science_, N. S., vol. XXIV, nos. 621–623, and vol. XXXII, nos. 827
and 828.

Chantre, Ernest:
1. “Recherches anthropologiques dans l’Asie occidentale,” _Extrait
des Archives du musée d’histoire naturelle de Lyon._ Lyon, 1895.
2. _Recherches anthropologiques dans le Caucase_, 4 vols. Paris,
1885–1887.

Clay, Albert T. _The Empire of the Amorites._ Yale University Press,
1919.

Clemenceau, Georges. _South America To-day._ New York and London, G.
Putnam & Sons, 1911.

Collignon, R.:
1. “L’anthropologie au conseil de révision, etc.,” _Bulletin de la
Société d’anthropologie_, pp. 736–805. 1890. Also _Bull. Soc.
d’anth._, 1883.
2. “Anthropologie de la France: Dordogne, Charente, Creuse, Corrèze,
Haute-Vienne,” _Mémoires de la Société d’anthropologie_, série 3,
I, fasc. 3, pp. 3–79.
3. “Anthropologie du sud-ouest de la France,” _Mém. Soc. d’anth._,
série 3, fasc. 4.
4. “Étude anthropométrique élémentaire des principales races de
France,” _Bull. Soc. d’anth._, pp. 463–526, 1883.
5. “Étude sur l’ethnographie générale de la Tunisie,” _Bull. de
géographie historique et descriptive_, Paris, 1887.
6. “L’indice céphalique des populations françaises,” _L’Anth._, série
1, pp. 200–224, 1890.
7. “Répartition de la couleur des yeux et des cheveux chez les
Tunisiens sédentaires,” _Rev. d’anth._, série 3, t. III, 1888.

Comparetti, Domenico. “Le leggi di gortyna, e le altre iscrizioni
arcaiche cretesi,” _Monumenti Antichi_, vol. III, Milano, 1893.

Conklin, Edwin G.:
1. _Heredity and Environment._ Princeton University Press, 1915.
2. “The Mechanism of Evolution in the Light of Hereditary
Development,” _Scientific Monthly_, vols. IX, no. 6, 1919, and X,
nos. 1, 2, 3, 1920.

Constantinus Porphyrogenitus. _Corpus scriptorum historiæ byzantinæ._

Conway, R. S.:
1. _Early Italic Dialects._ Cambridge University Press, 1897.
2. “The Pre-Hellenic Inscriptions of Præsos,” _Annual of the British
School at Athens_, vol. VIII, pp. 125–157.
3. “A Third Eteocretan Fragment,” _Ann. Brit. Sch. at Athens_, vol.
X, pp. 115–127.

Crawford, O. G. S. “Distribution of Early Bronze Age Settlements in
Britain,” _Geographical Journal_, XL, pp. 184 _seq._, 1912.

Cuno, J. G. _Forschungen im Gebiete der alten Völkerkunde._ Berlin,
1871.

Cvijič, Jovan:
1. “The Geographical Distribution of the Balkan Peoples,”
_Geographical Review_, vol. V, no. 5, pp. 345–361, May, 1918.
2. “The Zones of Civilization of the Balkan Peninsula,” _Geog. Rev._,
vol. V, no. 6, June, 1918.

Darwin, Charles. _The Descent of Man_, 2d ed. London, John Murray,
1901.

Davenport, Charles B.:
1. _The Feebly Inhibited, Nomadism ... Inheritance of Temperament._
Washington, D. C., Carnegie Institution, 1915.
2. _Heredity in Relation to Eugenics._ New York, Henry Holt & Co.,
1911.

Davis, J. Barnard:
1. _Thesaurus Craniorum._ London, 1867.
2. (With J. Thurnam.) _Crania Britannica._ 2 vols. London, 1865.

Dawkins, W. Boyd. _Early Man in Britain._ London, Macmillan, 1880.

Dawson, Charles:
1. “On the Discovery of a Palæolithic Human Skull and Mandible in a
Flint-bearing Gravel Overlaying the Wealden (Hastings Beds) at
Piltdown, Fletching, Sussex.” With an appendix by Prof. G. Elliot
Smith (with A. Smith Woodward), _Quarterly Journal of the
Geological Society_, vol. LXIX, part I, pp. 117–151, London, 1913.
2. “Prehistoric Man in Sussex,” _Zoologist_, series 4, vol. XVII, pp.
33–36.
3. “Supplementary note, On the Discovery of a Palæolithic Human Skull
and Mandible,” _Quart. Jour. Geol. Soc._, vol. LXX, pp. 82–99,
London, 1914.

Déchelette, J. _Manuel d’archéologie._ Paris, A. Picard et Fils, 1908.

Deniker, J.:
1. “Les races de l’Europe, Note préliminaire,” _L’anthropologie_,
vol. IX, pp. 113–133, Paris, 1898.
2. _The Races of Man_. New York, Scribner; London, Walter Scott,
1902.

Dill, Samuel:
1. _Roman Society in the Last Century of the Western Empire_, 2d ed.
Macmillan, 1906.
2. _Roman Society from Nero to Marcus Aurelius._ Macmillan, 1905.

Diodorus Siculus. _Bibliothecæ historicæ._

Dionysius Perigetes. _Orbis descriptio._

Dottin, G. _Manuel Celtique._ Paris, Édouard Champion, 1915.

Dubois, E. _Pithecanthropus Erectus, eine menschenähnliche
Uebergangsform aus Java._ Batavia, 1894.

Duckworth, W. L. H.:
1. _Morphology and Anthropology._ Cambridge University Press, 1904.
2. _Prehistoric Man._ New York, Putnam, 1912.

Dugdale, R. L. _The Jukes._ New York, Putnam, 1877.

Eginhard. _Life of Charlemagne_, Glaister translation. London, George
Bell & Sons, 1877.

Evans, Sir Arthur J.:
1. “Cretan Pictographs and Pre-Phœnician Script,” _Journal of
Hellenic Studies_, vol. XIV, part 2, pp. 270–373. 1895.
2. “Essai de classification des époques de la civilisation
minoienne,” _Report of the British Association_, 1904 (1905),
London, 1906.
3. “Further Discoveries of Cretan and Ægean Script,” _Jour. of
Hellenic Studies_, vol. XVII, pp. 327–395. 1898.
4. _Prehistoric Tombs of Knossos._ 1906.
5. “Reports of Excavations at Cnossus,” _Ann. Brit. Sch. at Athens_,
vols. VI-X.
6. _Scripta minoa._ Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1909.

Evans, Sir John. _Ancient Bronze Implements ... of Great Britain and
Ireland._ Longmans, Green & Co., 1881.

Faguet, Émile. _Le culte de l’incompétence._ Paris, B. Grasset, 1914.

Feist, Sigismund:
1. _Address to the International Congress at Gratz._ 1909.
2. _Beiträge z. Geschichte der Deutschen Sprache u. Literatur_, XXXI,
2, Sept. 15, 1910.
3. Europa im Lichte der Vorgeschichte “Quellen und Forschungen zur
alten Geschichte und Geographie,” 19, 1910.
4. _Geschichte Deutschen Sprachen und Kultur der Indo-Germanen._
1913.
5. Kultur, _Ausbreitung und Herkunft der Indo-Germanen_. Berlin,
Weidmann, 1913.

Ferrero, Guglielmo. _The Greatness and Decline of Rome._ New York,
Putnam, 1909.

Fischer, Eugen. _Die Rehobother Bastards._ Jena, Fischer, 1913.

Fischer, E. “Fossile Hominiden,” _Sonderabdruck Handwörterbuch
Naturwissenschaft_, Bd. IV, Jena, 1913.

Fisher, H. A. L. _The Political History of England_, vol. IV. Edited by
William Hunt and Reginald Poole. London, Longmans, Green & Co.,
1906.

Fisher, Irving. _National Vitality, Its Wastes and Conservation._
Senate Document, no. 676, vol. III, 60th Congress, 2d Session.
Washington, D. C., Government Printing Office, March, 1910.

Fleure, H. J. (with James, T. C.). “Anthropological Types in Wales,”
_Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and
Ireland_, vol. XLVI, pp. 35–154.

Fleure, H. J. (with L. Winstanley). “Anthropology and Our Older
Histories,” _Jour. Roy. Anth. Inst._, vol. XLVIII, pp. 155 seq.

Flower and Lydekker. _Mammals, Living and Extinct._ London, Adam and
Charles Black, 1891.

Ford, Henry Jones. _The Scotch-Irish in America._ Princeton University
Press, 1915.

Frank, Tenney:
1. “Race Mixture in the Roman Empire,” _American Historical Review_,
vol. XXI, no. 4, July, 1916.
2. _Roman Imperialism._ Macmillan, 1914.

Freeman, E. A.:
1. _A Historical Geography of Europe._ Edited by J. B. Bury, 3d ed.
London, Longmans, Green & Co., 1912.
2. _Race and Language._ Historical Essays, series 3, pp. 173–230. New
York and London, Macmillan, 1879.

Fritsch, Gustave. _Das Haupthaar und seine Bildungsstätte bei den
Rassen des Menschen._ Berlin, 1912.

Funel, L. “Les parlers populaires du département des Alpes-Maritimes,”
_Bull. géogr. hist. et descrip._, no. 2, 1897.

Fustel de Coulanges. _La cité antique_, 2me éd. Paris, L. Hachette et
Cie., 1866.

Gaillard, Claude. (See Lortet, Louis.) “Les Tatonnements des Égyptiens
de l’ancien empire à la recherche des animaux à domestiquer,” _Revue
d’ethnographie_, 1912.

Galton, Sir Francis. _Hereditary Genius._ London and New York,
Macmillan & Co., 1892.

Garstang, S. J. _The Land of the Hittites._ London, Constable & Co.,
1910.

Gatterer, J. C. _Comm. Societ. Reg. Scient._, XIII, Göttingen.

Geer, Baron Gerard de. “A Geochronology of the Last 12,000 Years,”
_Compte-Rendue de la session 1910, du Congrès Géol. Intern._, vol.
XI, fasc. 1, pp. 241–257.

Gibbon. _Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire._

Gindely, Anton. _History of the Thirty Years’ War_. New York, G.
Putnam’s Sons, 1884.

Giuffrida-Ruggeri, V. “A Sketch of the Anthropology of Italy,” _Jour.
Roy. Anth. Inst._, vol. XLVIII, pp. 80–103. 1918.

Gjerset, Knut. _The History of the Norwegian People._ New York,
Macmillan, 1915.

Glück, Leopold. “Zur Physischen Anthropologie der Albanesen,”
_Wissenschaftliche Mitteilungen aus Bosnien und Herzegovina_.

Gowland, W. “The Metals in Antiquity,” _Jour. Roy. Anth. Inst._, vol.
XLII, pp. 235–288.

Grant, Madison. “The Origin and Relationships of North American
Mammals,” _Eighth Annual Report of the New York Zoological Society_,
New York, 1904.

Green, John R. _A History of the English People._ New York, Harper,
1878.

Greenwell, W., Canon. _British Barrows._ Oxford, 1877.

Gregory, W. K.:
1. “The Dawn Man of Piltdown, England,” _American Museum Journal_,
vol. XIV, New York, May, 1914.
2. “Facts and Theories of Evolution, with Special Reference to the
Origin of Man,” _Dental Cosmos_, pp. 3–19, March, 1920.
3. “Studies on the Evolution of the Primates,” _Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat.
Hist._, vol. XXXV, article xix, New York, 1916.

Gross, V. _La Tène, un oppidum helvète._ Supplément, 1886, to _Les
Protohelvètes_. Berlin, 1883.

Grierson, G. A. _A Linguistic Survey of India_, vol. IV, _Munda and
Dravidian Languages_. Calcutta, 1906.

Grillière, M. le Dr. “La taille des conscrits corréziens de la classe
1910,” _Bull. Soc. d’anth._, série VI, t. IV, pp. 392–400. 1913.

Haddon, A. C.:
1. _The Races of Man and Their Distribution._ London, Milner & Co.
2. _The Study of Man._ New York, Putnam; and London, Bliss Sands,
1898.
3. _The Wanderings of Peoples._ Cambridge University Press, 1912.

Haeckel, Ernest. _The Riddle of the Universe._ Harper, 1901.

Hall, H. R. _The Ancient History of the Near East_, 3d edition. London,
Methuen & Co., 1916.

Hall, Prescott F.:
1. _Immigration_, 2d ed. New York, Henry Holt & Co. 1908.
2. “Immigration Restriction and World Eugenics,” _Journal of
Heredity_, vol. X, no. 3, pp. 125–127, Washington, D. C., March,
1919.

Harrison, J. P. “On the Survival of Racial Features in the Population
of the British Isles,” _Jour. Roy. Anth. Inst._, vol. XII, pp.
243–258.

Hart, H. H. _Sterilization as a Practical Measure._ Russell Sage
Foundation.

Hauser, O. See Klaatsch.

Hawes, C. H.: 1. “Some Dorian Descendants?” _Ann. Brit. Sch. at
Athens_, no. XVI, pp. 254–280. 1909–1910.
2. (With H. B. Hawes.) _Crete, the Forerunner of Greece_, 1911.

Herodotus. _History of the World._

Hervé, G.:
1. “Les brachycéphales néolithiques,” _Revue d’école
d’anthropologie_, tome IV, pp. 392–406, Paris, 1894; V, pp. 18–28,
1895.
2. “Les populations lacustres,” _Rev. d’école d’anth._, t. V, pp.
137–154, Paris, 1895.

Hirt, Herman:
1. _Die Indo-Germanen, ihre Verbreitung, ihre Urheimat und ihre
Kultur._ Strassburg, Trübner, 1905.
2. “Die Urheimat ... der Indo-Germanen,” _Geographische Zeitschrift_,
Bd. I, Leipsig, 1895.

His and Rütimeyer. _Crania Helvetica._ Basel, 1861.

Hodgkin, Thos. _Italy and Her Invaders._

Hoernes, Moritz:
1. “Die Hallstattperiode,” _Archive für Anthropologie_, Bd. XXXI, pp.
233–283. 1905.
2. _Urgeschichte d. Mensch._ Wien, 1890.

Holmes, T. Rice:
1. _Ancient Britain, and the Conquests of Julius Cæsar._ Oxford
University Press, 1907.
2. _Cæsar’s Conquest of Gaul._ Oxford University Press, 1911.

Homer. The Iliad; the Odyssey.

Horace. _Epodes._

Hrdlička, Aleš.:
1. “The Genesis of the American Indian,” _19th International Congress
of Americanists_, pp. 559 _seq._, Washington, D. C., 1915.
2. “The Most Ancient Skeletal Remains of Man,” _Report, Smithsonian
Institution_, pp. 481–552, Pub. 2300, 1913. Washington, D. C.,
Government Printing Office, 1914.
3. “Old White Americans,” _19th Internat’l Congress of Americanists_,
pp. 582 _seq._ Washington, D. C., 1915.

Hoton. See Peake.

Huntington, Ellsworth:
1. _Civilization and Climate._ Yale University Press and Oxford
University Press, 1915.
2. _The Pulse of Asia._ Boston, Houghton Mifflin Co., 1907.

Jacobs, J. “On the Racial Characteristics of Modern Jews,” _Jour. Roy.
Anth. Inst._, vol. XV, pp. 23–62. 1885–1886.

James, T. C. (with Fleure, H. J.). “Anthropological Types in Wales,”
_Jour. Roy. Anth. Inst._, vol. XLVI, pp. 35–154. 1916.

Jessen, A. (Et Thomsen, Thomas). _Une trouvaille de l’ancien âge de la
pierre._ Copenhague, Braband, 1906.

Johnston, Sir Harry H.:
1. _The Negro in the New World._ London, Methuen & Co., 1910.
2. “On North African Animals, A Survey of the Ethnography of Africa,”
_Jour. Roy. Anth. Inst._, vol. XLIII, pp. 375–422.
3. Various writings.
4. _Views and Reviews._ London, Williams and Norgate, 1912.

Jones, David B. (With Rhys, John.) _The Welsh People._ London,
Macmillan, 1900.

Jones, Sir J. Morris. “Pre-Aryan Syntax in Insular Celtic,” Appendix B
of Rhys and Jones, _The Welsh People_. London, Macmillan, 1900.

Jordan, David Starr. _War and the Breed._ Boston, The Beacon Press,
1915.

Jordanes. _History of the Goths_, Mierow translation. Princeton
University Press, 1915.

Josephus, Flavius. _De Bello Judaico_, or _The Jewish War of Flavius
Josephus_, translated by Robert Traill. London, Houlston & Stoneman,
1851.

Kanitz, P. F. _Donau-Bulgarien und der Balkan._ Leipsig, 1875.

Keane, A. H.:
1. _Ethnology._ Cambridge University Press, 1896.
2. _Man, Past and Present._ Cambridge University Press, 1900. Also
new edition by Ouiggin & Haddon.

Keary, C. F. _The Vikings in Western Christendom._ London, T. Fisher
Unwin, 1891.

Keith, Arthur:
1. _Ancient Types of Man._ Harper, 1911.
2. The _Antiquity of Man._ London, Williams and Norgate, 1915.
3. “Presidential Address to the Royal Anthropological Society of
Great Britain and Ireland,” _Jour. Roy. Anth. Inst._, vol. XLV,
pp. 12–23. 1915.

Keller, Ferdinand. _The Lake-Dwellings of Switzerland and Other Parts
of Europe_, translated by John Edward Lee, F.S.A., F.G.S., 2d
edition. London, Longmans, Green & Co., 1878.

King, L. W.:
1. _Chronicles Concerning the Early Babylonian Kings._ London, Luzac
& Co., 1907.
2. _The History of Babylonia and Assyria._ London, Chatto.
Vol. I, _The History of Sumer and Akkad_, 1910.
Vol. II, _The History of Babylon_, 1915.

Klaatsch, H. _Homo-Aurignacius Hauseri_, 1909.

Klaatsch, H., and O. Hauser. _Archiv für Anthropologie_, 1908.

Klaproth, J. _Tableaux historiques de l’Asie._ Paris, 1826.

Kluchevsky, V. O. _A History of Russia_, 3 vols., translated by C. J.
Hogarth. London, Dent & Sons; New York, E. P. Dutton, 1911–1913.

Kolrausch, F. _Deutsche Geschichte._

Kraus, Franz Xaver. _Dante._ Berlin, 1897.

Kretschmer, P. _Einleitung in die Geschichte der Griechischen Sprache_.
Göttingen, 1896.

Kurth, G. “La frontière linguistique en Belgique,” _Mém. couronnés
Acad. R. Scien. Lit. et Beaux Arts de Belg._, XLVIII, vol. I, 1895;
vol. II, 1898. Brussels.

Lapouge, V. C. de:
1. _L’Aryen, son rôle sociale._ Paris, 1899.
2. _Les Sélections sociales._ Paris, 1896.
3. Various writings.

Laughlin, Harry H. _Eugenics Record Office Bulletins_, 10A and 10B.

Previous Next

Comments

The passing of the great race; or, The racial basis of European historyChapter XIV: The Aryan Language in Asia

0%22 min left in chapter