Chapter III: The Work of Running Water (4)

=Adjustment of streams to rock structures.=—Valleys (gullies) locate themselves at the outset without immediate regard to the hardness and softness of their beds. It is primarily the slope about the head of a gully which determines its line of growth, though relative hardness often determines the details of slope, even in the early stages of an erosion cycle. Once established, streams tend to hold their courses, even if this involves the crossing of resistant layers.

While a region where more and less resistant layers of rock come to the surface is in a youthful stage of erosion, some of the valleys (and therefore the streams) are likely to be located on the less resistant rock, some on the more resistant, and some partly on the one and partly on the other. The streams on the weaker rock will deepen their valleys more rapidly than the others, and those which flow across stronger and weaker rocks alternately will deepen their valleys more rapidly than those which run on hard rock all the time. The former conclusion is self-evident. The latter appears from the fact that rapids will be likely to develop at the crossing of each hard layer, thus accelerating erosion at those points. Such a stream therefore not only has less hard rock to erode than one which flows on resistant rock all the time, but it erodes that which it does cross much faster.

Streams which do not cross hard layers therefore have an advantage over those which do, and the tributaries to such streams, since they join deeper mains, have an advantage over the tributaries to the others. The valleys of the former may lengthen until their heads reach the latter, and capture their streams. This sequence of events is illustrated in the accompanying diagrams (Figs. 125–27). Even where several streams cross the same resistant bed, piracy is likely to take place among them, for some are sure to deepen their valleys faster than others, because of inequalities of volume, load, or hardness. This is illustrated by Figs. 128–30. An actual case is shown in Figs. 131, 132. Though piracy may take place when streams do not flow over rock of unequal hardness (p. 103), it is much more common where unequal resistance of the rock puts one stream at a disadvantage as compared with another.

The changes in the courses of streams, by means of which they come to sustain definite and stable relations to the rock structure beneath, are known as processes of _adjustment_.[54] Since streams and valleys adjust themselves to other conditions as well, this phase of adjustment may be called _structural adjustment_. Structural adjustment is not uncommon among rivers flowing over strata which are vertical or highly inclined, since in these positions the hard and soft strata are most likely to come to the surface in frequent alternation. The smaller streams suffer capture and adjustment first, since, as a rule, they have shallower valleys. It often happens that main streams, because of their deeper valleys, hold courses not in adjustment with structure (the Delaware, the Susquehanna, etc.), while tributary streams are captured, diverted, and adjusted. The capture of a tributary, however, leads both to the diminution of its main and to the increase of its captor, and the weakened stream may ultimately fall a prey to the one which is strengthened.

The processes of adjustment go on until the streams flow as much as possible on the weaker beds, and as little as possible on the stronger, when adjustment is complete. This amounts to the same thing as saying that the outcrops of the hard layers tend to become divides. In many cases an area is so situated that there is no escape for its drainage except across resistant rock. In this case its drainage is completely adjusted when as few streams as possible cross the resistant rock, and these by the shortest routes.

Adjustment has been carried to a high degree of perfection in most parts of the Appalachian system. Here, as in all other mountains of similar structure, strata of unequal hardness were folded into ridges. In this case, the folds have been truncated by erosion, exposing the more and the less resistant beds (_H_ and _S_ respectively) in alternate belts along the flanks of the truncated folds (_ab_ and _cd_, Fig. 133). The streams, especially the lesser ones, now flow along the strike of the softer beds much more commonly than elsewhere, and where they cross the hard layers it is usually at right angles to the strike. This is shown in Fig. 134, where the arrows indicate the direction of strike. In the history of these rivers, however, a factor is involved which has not yet been considered, and these streams will be referred to later.

As base-level is approached, the outcrops of hard rock are brought low. When they have been reduced to the level of their surroundings, the streams may flow without regard to the resistance of the rock beneath, for downward cutting has ceased. As this stage of erosion is approached, a readjustment of the drainage may take place, and the waters which had taken long and circuitous courses to avoid hard rock, may change their courses to more direct ones (compare Figs. 130 and 135). Adjustment is, therefore, a relative term, and streams which are adjusted at one stage of erosion, are not necessarily adjusted at another.

It sometimes happens that rocks of unequal resistance are covered by beds of uniform hardness. A consequent stream developed on the latter may find itself out of structural adjustment when it has cut its channel down to the level of the heterogeneous beds below. Such a stream is said to be _superimposed_ (Fig. 136) on the underlying structure. Structural adjustment is likely to follow.

INFLUENCE OF JOINTS AND FOLDS.

=Joints.=—Various structural features of rock other than hardness influence its erosion. Apart from the stratification planes, most rock formations are affected by joints or fissures. The joints are often, but not always, nearly vertical. Two sets are generally present, and sometimes more. If but two, they usually meet at a large angle; if more than two, two are likely to be nearly perpendicular to each other, while the third and fourth sets have such directions as to cut the others at large angles. These joints allow the ingress of water, roots, etc., which help to weather and disrupt rocks. Occasionally there is notable sag of the beds of rock along joint planes, but this effect is usually superficial only (Fig. 137). Where the jointage planes are frequent and open, the columns bounded by them sometimes topple over on cliff faces, either by undercutting, or by the wedge-work of roots or ice.

The effect of joints on erosion may often be seen along a stream which flows in a rock gorge. In such situations, the outlines of the banks are sometimes angular, and sometimes crenate (Fig. 138), the reëntrants being located at the joints. By working into and widening joints, running water sometimes isolates masses of rock as islands (Fig. 139). In a region free from mantle rock, or where the mantle rock is meagre, joints often determine the courses of valleys by directing the course of surface drainage. This is shown in many parts of the arid west. In regions where the rocks are notably faulted, the courses of the streams are sometimes controlled by the courses of the fault planes. This is the case, for example, in central Washington.[55]

The jointing of rocks often shows itself distinctly in the weathered faces of cliffs (Figs. 140 and 141), especially in arid and semi-arid regions, or where the slope is too steep for the accumulation of soil and rock-waste on its surface.

If a stream flowing over jointed rock has falls, the conditions are sometimes afforded for the development of an exceptional and striking scenic feature. If above Niagara Falls, for example, there were an open joint in the bed of the stream (as at _b_, Fig. 142), some portion of the water would descend through it. After reaching a lower level it might find or make a passage through the rock to the river below the falls. If even a little water took such a course, the flow would enlarge its channel, making a passageway between the joint through which the water descended and the valley below the falls (_bcde_, Fig. 142). This passageway might become large enough to accommodate all the water of the river. In this case, the entire fall would be transferred from the position which it previously occupied (_f_) to the position of the enlarged joint (_b_). The fall would then recede. The underground channel between the old falls and the new would be bridged by rock (_bf″_ and _f‴_, Fig. 143), making a _natural bridge_. The natural bridge near Lexington, Va. (Fig. 144), almost 200 feet above the stream which flows beneath it, is believed to have been developed in this way. A similar bridge is now in process of development in Two Medicine River in northwestern Montana (Fig. 145). Once in existence, a natural bridge will slowly weather away.

It is not to be understood that all natural bridges have had this history. They are sometimes developed from underground caves when parts of their roofs are destroyed, as well as in various other ways.

=Folds.=—The erosion of folded strata (anticlines and synclines) leads to the development of distinctive topographic features. So soon as a fold begins to be lifted, it is, by reason of its position, subject to more rapid erosion than its surroundings. For the same reason the crest of the fold is likely to be degraded more rapidly than its lower slopes, and must suffer more degradation before it is brought to base-level. Folds are usually composed of beds of unequal resistance, and as the degradation of a fold proceeds, successive layers are worn from the top, and the alternating hard and soft layers composing it are exposed. So soon as this is accomplished, adjustment of the streams is likely to begin, and the watercourses, and later the valley plains, come to be located on the outcrops of the less resistant layers, while the outcrops of the harder beds become ridges.

If the axis of an eroded anticline were horizontal, a given hard layer, the arch of which has been cut off, would, after erosion, outcrop on both sides of the axis. When the topography was mature these outcrops would constitute parallel ridges, or parallel lines of hills; when the region had been base-leveled, the outcrops would be in parallel belts, though no longer ridges or hills. The lower the plane of truncation, the farther apart would the outcrops be in the anticline, and the nearer together in the syncline (compare _ab_ and _cd_, Fig. 133).

If, on the other hand, the axis of the anticline or syncline to be eroded was not horizontal, that is, if it _plunged_, the topographic result would be somewhat different. Suppose a plunging anticline to be truncated at base-level. If either end of the fold plunged below the plane of truncation, the outcrops of a given layer on opposite sides of the axis would converge in the direction of plunge, and come together at the end. At a stage of erosion antedating planation (say late maturity) there would have been a ridge, or a succession of hills, in the position corresponding to the outcrop of a hard layer, with a canoe-shaped valley within. If two hard layers were involved, instead of one, there would be two encircling ridges, with a curved valley between them, and a canoe-shaped valley within the innermost (Fig. 146). If the anticline plunged both ways, the valley enclosed by the hard-layer ridge would be canoe-shaped at both ends (Fig. 147). In such a case there would be likely to be a low gap (water-gap) in the rim of the valley through which the drainage which degraded the surface escaped, but there would be likely to be but one, for if two or more streams had drained the area of the valley at an early stage of erosion, one would be likely to have captured the others (see p. 138) before late maturity. A succession of doubly-plunging anticlines and synclines might give rise to a very complex series of ridges and valleys. Illustrations of the above phenomena are found at various points in the Appalachian Mountains, especially in eastern Pennsylvania.[56]

In the structural adjustment which goes with the erosion of folds, it often happens that the valleys come to be located on the anticlines, while the outcrops of the hard layers on the flanks of the anticlines, or even in the original synclines, become the mountains. The adjustments by which valleys come to be located on anticlines are somewhat as follows:[57] Fig. 148 represents two doubly-plunging anticlines with a syncline between, the relative elevations being shown by contour lines. At the outset, the drainage of such a region must have followed the structural valley, and its initial course, consequent on the slope, must have been down the axial trough. Drainage from the anticlines into the synclines would have promptly developed valleys, and the valleys would soon have acquired streams.

The anticlines and synclines under consideration are assumed to have a thick hard layer at the surface, and softer beds below. This is shown in the cross-section introduced in the figure, the upper hard stratum (_m_) being indicated by the dots, while the softer one (_n_) is white. The line _oo_ represents base-level, which is below the hard layer both in the syncline and anticline, but much farther below in the latter position than in the former. Because of their higher gradients, and because of the greater fracturing to which the region they drain was presumably subject at the time of folding, the tributary streams might cut through the hard layer sooner than the main stream which they join. This done, they would enlarge their valleys rapidly in the softer rock beneath, and secondary tributaries would be developed (Fig. 149). When the condition of things represented in Fig. 149 is reached, the streams _c_ and _d_, tributary to the synclinal stream, come into competition. The former has the advantage over the latter, because it joins the main stream at a lower level. Stream _c_ will therefore be likely to capture _d_. The incipient stages of the capture are stealthy, and the later bold. At first the divide between their head waters is shifted northward inch by inch, because the gradient toward _g_ is higher than that toward _e_. The capture of the head waters of _e_ is as slow as the migration of the divide, until the divide reaches the point where _e_ joins _f_. The stream _f_ is then diverted promptly into the valley of _g_, and is at once led away to _c_ (see Fig. 150). Strengthened by its increased volume, the stream _c_ (Fig. 150) lowers its valley across the hard layer more rapidly than before, and so holds the advantage it has gained. Not only this, but the beheaded stream _d_ (Fig. 150), because of its diminished volume, sinks its valley into the hard layer less rapidly than before, and its decrease in power also works to the advantage of the stream leading to _c_. The result is that the divide between _fg_ and _d_ does not remain constant, but is driven back step by step toward _a_.

Similarly a tributary to the main stream at _b_ (Fig. 150), may by means of its tributary _h_, capture the waters of _fg_, and lead them to the synclinal valley at _b_ (compare Figs. 150 and 151). Deprived of its main source of supply (at _c_) the synclinal stream is greatly diminished above _b_, and cuts more and more slowly, while the stream _fgh_ (Fig. 151), having greater volume and working mainly in softer rock, sinks its channel faster than the stream in the synclinal axis. Under these circumstances, the stream at _f_ may cut its valley below the valley in the synclinal axis _a_ (Fig. 150). In this event, the divide between _f_ and _a_ (Fig. 150) may be pushed back until the synclinal stream is beheaded at _a_ and carried out of the syncline and over into the anticlinal valley (Fig. 151). Thus, the old anticlinal axis comes to be the course of the main stream. Similarly the stream entering the syncline at _b_ (Fig. 151) might later be captured by _i_, thus lengthening its anticlinal course.

It is not to be understood that this sequence of events will take place in the degradation of every anticline, but the principles here set forth will always be operative. The result specified will be accomplished wherever hard and soft layers have the relations indicated in the diagrams; that is, where the stream in the syncline finds itself on a resistant layer as it approaches base-level, while at the same time the (original) tributary streams are working in softer beds. It is not to be understood, therefore, that streams migrate from synclines to anticlines for the sake of getting out of the former positions into the latter. If they shift their courses it is to find easier ones.

That these changes are not fanciful is shown by the fact that the adjustment described corresponds with that shown in many parts of the Appalachian Mountains, and in other mountains of similar structure.

If in a later stage of its history, the new main stream, _fh_, were to cut its bed down to a lower hard layer, while the original stream, _ab_, reached a softer bed beneath the hard one above, the latter would again have an advantage, and a new series of adjustments would be inaugurated which might result in re-establishing the main stream in its original synclinal position.

EFFECT OF CHANGES OF LEVEL.

=Rise.=—If after being base-leveled, or notably reduced by erosion, a region is uplifted so as to increase the gradients and therefore the velocities of the streams which drain it, the streams are said to be _rejuvenated_, and a new cycle of erosion is begun. If the rise of the area were equal everywhere, while the coast line remained constant in position, there would be an immediate increase in velocity only at the debouchures of the streams flowing directly into the sea. At the debouchures of such streams there would be rapids or falls. Each rapids or falls would promptly recede, and with the recession, the acceleration of velocity resulting from the uplift would be felt farther and farther up-stream, and ultimately to its source. The rejuvenated streams would cut new valleys in the bottoms of their old ones (Figs. 152 and 153). The new valleys would begin where the increase in velocity was first felt, and they would be lengthened by head erosion just as valleys of the first cycle were lengthened.

When the head of the new part of a valley of a rejuvenated stream recedes past the mouth of a tributary adjusted[58] to the gradient of the main stream before rejuvenation, the velocity of the tributary is accelerated at its debouchure, and it begins to excavate a new valley in the bottom of its old one. The new valley commences at the lower end of the old one, and develops headward (_a_ and _b_, Fig. 153). Good illustrations are furnished by the streams in the west central part of New Jersey. The Delaware has here a sharply defined valley, and its tributaries are essentially as deep as their main at the point of junction. Above this point they have high gradients for a short distance (three to six miles), beyond which they wind sluggishly in wide valleys with low gradients across a relatively high plateau. Their profiles are illustrated by Fig. 154. The flat, though high, surface in which their upper courses lie, appears to have been nearly base-leveled in an earlier cycle, and then to have been elevated. The date of the elevation is fixed, in terms of erosion, by the time necessary for the excavation of the Delaware gorge, and the narrow gorges along the lower courses of its tributaries. It was so recent that the effects of rejuvenation, proceeding from the debouchures of the tributaries toward their heads, have not yet advanced far from the Delaware. Similar relations are found elsewhere (Fig. 1, Pl. XIII, s. c. Col.). Another peculiarity of rejuvenated drainage is shown in Fig. 2, Plate XIII (s. Kan.). Here Elm Creek flows at a level 200 feet below that of Sand Creek, 4 miles distant. The valley of the former appears to have entered upon a new cycle as the result of uplift, while that of the latter, _in the area shown on the map_, is still unrejuvenated. Farther down-stream, the valley of Sand Creek shows signs of rejuvenation. It may be noted that a tributary of Amber Creek has good opportunity to capture Sand Creek, for the latter flows about 25 miles before reaching the level of Amber Creek at its junction with Elm Creek.

Fig. 1. COLORADO.
U. S. Geol. Surv.

Fig. 2. KANSAS.
U. S. Geol. Surv.]

Fig. 1. PENNSYLVANIA.
U. S. Geol. Surv.

Fig. 2. CALIFORNIA.
U. S. Geol. Surv.]

Should the lower end of a tributary valley fail to be degraded as fast as the valley of the main at the point of junction, the tributary is out of _topographic adjustment_ with its main. Falls or rapids may result. When the lower end of a tributary valley is distinctly above the level of its main, the former is called a _hanging valley_. Hanging valleys developed by stream erosion alone are not common except just after the recession of a falls past the mouth of a tributary. Hanging valleys, as well as the characters and relations illustrated by Figs. 152–154 are criteria of rejuvenation, but they must be applied with discretion. Such profiles, for example, as that shown in Fig. 154 may be developed when the rock of a stream’s bed is unequally resistant, and hanging valleys are generally a result of glaciation (see Chapter V).

Rejuvenated streams sometimes inherit certain peculiarities from their aged ancestors. Thus a rejuvenated stream may intrench the meanders possessed by the old stream which preceded (see Fig. 1, Pl. XIV, near Harrisburg, Pa.), and intrenched meanders are one of the marks of rejuvenated streams. They are not uncommon in the Appalachian Mountain regions, and are known in other parts of the world. The Seine and the Moselle furnish further illustrations.[59]

The history of the new cycle of erosion inaugurated by the uplift would differ from that of the preceding cycle in that the new one would begin with a drainage system already developed. Other things being equal, therefore, the reduction of the land would proceed more rapidly in a subsequent cycle than in the first.

The recognition of different cycles of erosion, separated by uplifts, is often easy. The principles involved are illustrated by Fig. 155 which represents an ideal profile of considerable length (say 50 miles). The points _a_, _a′_, and _a″_ reach a common level. Below them there are areas _b_, _b′_, and _b″_ which have a nearly common elevation, below which are the sharp valleys _d_, _d′_, and _d″_. The points _a_, _a′_, and _a″_ represent the cross-sections of ridges formed by the outcrops of layers of hard rock. If the crests of the ridges are level, the points _a_, _a′_, and _a″_ must represent remnants of an old base-level, _since at no time after a ridge of hard rock becomes deeply notched does it acquire an even crest, until it is base-leveled_.[60] At all earlier stages its crest is uneven. After the cycle represented by the remnants _a_, _a′_, and _a″_ was completed, the region suffered uplift. A new cycle represented by the plain _b_, _b′_, and _b″_ was well advanced, though not completed, when the region was again elevated, and the rejuvenated streams began to cut their valleys _d_, _d′_, and _d″_ in the plain of the previous incomplete cycle. The elevations, _c_ and _c′_ (intermediate in elevation between _a_, _a′_, and _a″_, and _b_, _b′_, and _b″_) may represent either remnants of the first base-level plain which were lowered, but not obliterated, while the plane _b, b′, b″_ was developing; or they may represent a cycle intermediate between that during which _a, a′, a″_ and _b, b′, b″_ were developed. If the intermediate elevations (_c, c′_) have a common height and level crests, the presumption would be in favor of the latter interpretation. If they be numerous and of varying heights, as is possible, they may in the field obscure the planes (_a, a′, a″_ and _b, b′, b″_) developed in the different cycles, which, in the figure, are distinct.

If the strata involved be horizontal the determination of cycles is sometimes less easy. Thus in Fig. 156, it is not possible to say whether _a_ and _a′_ represent remnants of an old base-level, or whether they represent the original surface from which degradation started. So, too, the various benches below _a_, such as _b_, _b′_, and _b″_ may readily be the result of the superior hardness of the beds at this level. For the determination of successive uplifts in the field it is necessary to consider areas of considerable size, and to eliminate the topographic effects of inequalities of hardness, and of certain other factors to be mentioned presently.

The inequalities in the depths of the young valleys in Figs. 155 and 156 may be explained on the supposition that the deeper ones belong to main streams, and the shallower ones to tributaries. Such a valley as that shown at _e_, Fig. 155, suggests rejuvenation at this point; but farther up the stream which occupies this valley, rejuvenation might not be apparent. In this case, the main streams might be flowing in new valleys, _d, d′_, etc., while the heads of their tributaries are still flowing in the older valleys of the preceding cycle (compare Fig. 154 and Fig. 1, Pl. XIII).

It is by the application of the preceding principles that it is known that the Appalachian Mountains, after being folded, were reduced to a peneplain (p. 76), throughout their whole extent from the Hudson River to Alabama. The peneplain level is indicated by the level crests of the Appalachian ridges, shown in cross profile by the high points of Fig. 157. The system was then uplifted, and in the cycle of erosion which followed, broad plains were developed at a new and lower level, corresponding in a general way to the plains _b_, _b′_, and _b″_ of Fig. 155. The plains were located, for the most part, where the less resistant strata come to the surface. Above them rose even-crested ridges, the outcrops of the resistant layers, which had been isolated by the degradation of the softer beds between. They constitute the present mountain ridges (the high points of Fig. 157). The evenness of their crests, testifying to the completeness of the first peneplanation, is shown in Fig. 158, which represents, diagrammatically, a longitudinal profile of an Appalachian Mountain ridge. The evenness of the crest is interrupted by (1) notches (_b, c_, etc., Fig. 158) cut by the streams in later cycles, and (2) by occasional elevations above the common level (monadnocks, _a, a′_, Fig. 158). The monadnocks are generally rather inconspicuous, but there is a notable group of them in North Carolina and Tennessee. Mount Mitchell and Roane Mountain are examples. When long distances are considered, the ridge crests depart somewhat from horizontality. This is believed to be due, in part at least, to deformations of the old peneplain during the uplift which inaugurated the second cycle of erosion.

The extent to which the second cycle of erosion recorded in the present topography had proceeded before its interruption by uplift, is indicated by the extent of the valley plains (Fig. 157) below the mountain ridges. While these plains were being developed on the weak rocks, narrow valleys only (Fig. 158) were cut in the resistant rocks which now stood out as ridges. In Fig. 158 some of these valleys are shallow (_c, c′, c″_, etc.), and but one of them deep. The former may be either (1) the valleys of streams which crossed the hard layer at the beginning of the cycle, and which were diverted before their valleys became deep; or (2) they may represent the heads of valleys now working back into the ridges. The deep valley (_b_) represents the work of a stream which has held its course across the hard layer while the latter was being isolated as a mountain ridge (compare Figs. 131 and 132). Deep narrows of this sort are often called _water-gaps_. Similar valleys, whether shallow or deep, from which drainage has been diverted, are sometimes called _wind-gaps_. The second cycle of erosion, while still far from complete, was interrupted by uplift (relative or absolute), and a new cycle inaugurated. This event was so recent that the new (third) cycle has not yet advanced far.

Recently it has been urged that another cycle, intermediate between the first and second, is to be recognized.[61]

Some of the features just described are illustrated by Fig. 159. The even mountain crest in the background is the Kittatinny Mountain of New Jersey and its continuation in Pennsylvania. In common with other corresponding crests it represents the oldest recorded base-level (or peneplain) of the region. The great gap in the mountain is the Delaware Water-Gap. Below the mountain crest there is another plain, developed in a subsequent cycle of erosion, while the valley plain in the foreground represents the work of a still later cycle.

The oldest erosion plain of the Appalachian Mountains, the results of which are seen in the even-crested ridges so characteristic of the system, is sometimes called the _Kittatinny base-level_.[1] It was completed early in the Cretaceous period, and hence is sometimes known as the _Cretaceous base-level_. The next lower plain, imperfectly developed, has been called the Shenandoah Plain,[62] from the Shenandoah Valley where it is well seen (Fig. 132 and Fig. 2, Pl. XII). It is to be noted that the terms _base-level_ and _peneplain_ have both been used in connection with these old plains. _Graded plain_ is equally applicable. The truth is that the topographic types represented by these three terms grade into one another. It may be questioned whether definitions should be insisted on which differentiate these types more sharply than Nature has.

Many of the peculiarities of the drainage of the Appalachian Mountain system are intimately connected with the history just outlined. Thus three great rivers, the Delaware, the Susquehanna, and the Potomac, have their sources west of the Appalachians proper, cross the system in apparent disregard of the structure, and flow into the Atlantic. The James and Roanoke head far to the west, although not beyond the mountain system, and flow eastward, while the New River (leading to the Kanawha) farther south, heads east of the mountain-folds, and flows northwestward across the alternating hard and soft beds of the whole Appalachian system, to the Ohio (Fig. 160). The French Broad, a tributary to the Tennessee, has a similar course. Such streams are clearly not in structural adjustment, and afford good opportunities for piracy. Their courses were apparently assumed during the time of the Kittatinny base-level, when the streams had so low a gradient as not to be affected by the structure (p. 150). Elevation rejuvenated them, and they have held their courses in succeeding cycles across beds of unequal resistance, though smaller streams have become somewhat thoroughly adjusted. Crustal deformations have also helped them to hold their courses, for the Cretaceous peneplain seems to have been tilted to the southeast at its northern end, and to the southwest at its southern, when the succeeding cycle began.

Streams which hold their early courses in spite of changes which have taken place since their courses were assumed are said to be _antecedent_. They antedate the crustal movements which, but for pre-existent streams, would have given origin to a different arrangement of river courses. As a result of crustal movements, therefore, a consequent stream may become antecedent. Master streams are more likely to hold their courses, and therefore to become antecedent, than subordinate ones.

The uplift of base-leveled beds, especially if the beds are tilted so as to bring layers of unequal resistance to the surface at frequent intervals, affords conditions favorable for extensive adjustment. The numerous wind-gaps in the mountain ridges, representing the abandoned courses of minor streams, and the less numerous water-gaps, which indicate the resistance of large streams to structural adjustment, are instructive witnesses of the extent to which adjustment has gone. So extensive has been the adjustment among the streams of the Appalachian Mountains that there is probably no considerable stream in the whole system which has not gained or lost through its own or its neighbors’ piracy. The history of the rivers of the Appalachian Mountains has been further complicated by a considerable amount of warping during the periods of uplift.[63]

=Sinking.=—The land on which a river system is developed may be depressed relative to sea-level. In this case the sea would occupy the lower ends of valleys, converting them into bays and estuaries. A stream in this condition is said to be _drowned_. Of drowned rivers there are many examples along the Atlantic coast. Thus the St. Lawrence River is drowned up to Montreal, and the Hudson up to Albany. If the drowned portion of the latter valley were not so narrow, it would be a bay. Delaware and Chesapeake Bays, as well as many smaller ones, both north and south, are likewise the drowned ends of river valleys (see figures, Chapter VI). If all parts of a drainage basin sank equally, the velocities of the streams above the limit of drowning would not be changed, for the gradients would remain the same as before. The fact that a river’s channel is below sea-level is not to be taken as proof that the valley is drowned. Thus the bottom of the channel of the Mississippi is as much as 100 feet below the level of the Gulf, some 20 miles above New Orleans.[64]

=Differential movement. Warping.=—Where a land surface on which a river system is established suffers warping, some parts going up and others down, the opposite movements being either absolute or relative, various phenomena would result. This may be illustrated by the accompanying diagrams (Figs. 161 and 162), where the profiles of the streams are represented as warped from the positions represented by the dotted lines, to the positions shown by the full lines. The velocity will be accelerated below the points of differential elevation (between _a_ and _b_, Fig. 161, and between _a_ and _b_, and _c_ and _d_, Fig. 162), but checked above (above _a_, and between _b_ and _c_, Fig. 162). Above an elevation which notably checks its flow, a stream is _ponded_. If the ponding is slight, a marsh may develop above the obstruction; if more considerable, a lake is formed. Lakes of this class are likely to be short-lived, since the ponded waters are likely to soon overflow and lower their outlet so as to drain the lake. The elevation which ponds the stream may be great enough and rapid enough so that the resulting lake finds an outlet by some course other than that originally followed by the stream. Where a stream holds its course across an uplift athwart its valley, either with or without ponding, it becomes an antecedent stream (see p. 169), since it has a course assumed before the latest deformation of the crust and in apparent disregard of present surface configuration. Thus the Columbia River holds its antecedent course across areas which have been uplifted (differentially) hundreds and even thousands of feet.[65] Some of the striking scenic features of this noble valley are the result of these changes in the country through which it flows. A lesser stream would have been diverted, as many of its tributaries have been. Even its course across the Cascade ranges is believed to be antecedent.[66]

Another peculiarity of valleys and streams resulting from changes of level is illustrated in Fig. 2, Pl. XIV (southern California). The main valleys of this part of the coast were developed when the land stood considerably higher than now. Later the subsidence of the coast converted the lower ends of the valleys into bays or fiords. The bays were then transformed into lagoons by deposition. Subsequent rise of the land or depression of the sea allowed the drainage from the old lagoons to cut across the deposits which had converted the bays into lagoons. The result is an old, wide valley above, suggested by a young one below.

If the warpings were considerable, much more decisive changes in drainage would result. Suppose the drainage of a given region to be represented by the streams in Fig. 163. If there is uplift along the axis 1–2, that part of _ac_ above the axis of uplift would be ponded, or at least have its velocity checked, while the flow of some of the tributaries of _d_ would be accelerated, and might work back and capture the other stream (Fig. 164).

Crustal warping was one of the conditions under which the Tennessee achieved its present anomalous course, and its history[67] is illustrative of the complex changes which drainage suffers when warping affects the area where the rock structures are of unequal resistance. At the close of the Cretaceous cycle of erosion, when the Appalachian Mountains had been reduced to a peneplain, the waters falling in the area now drained by the upper course of the Tennessee flowed south-south-west to the Gulf in a stream (the Appalachian River, _a_, Fig. 165) the lower part of which had the general position of the Coosa and the Alabama.

To the west of the Appalachian River, shorter streams flowed west and southwest into the Mississippi embayment (Fig. 165) by courses which are not now definitely known. The succeeding cycle of erosion was inaugurated by uplift and deformation of the peneplain. The axis of greatest elevation (_AB_, Fig. 166) was nearly parallel to the Appalachian River, and the effect of the differential uplift was to impose a greater task on this river (_a_, Fig. 166), which flowed along the axis of uplift, than upon the rivers which flowed westward and southwestward to the Mississippi embayment. The result was that the strongest of the southwesterly flowing streams worked its head back into the drainage basin of the Appalachian River, and captured, one by one, the head-waters of its westerly tributaries, establishing some such drainage relations as are shown in Fig. 166. Still later, after the land area of the region had been considerably extended by the withdrawal of the sea, the Appalachian River itself was reached by the invading stream, and its waters carried away to the Mississippi Bay by a course the lower part of which is thought to have corresponded approximately with the course of the present Black River (_b_, Fig. 167).

]

Still later there was further deformation which caused additional changes in the drainage. The whole region was uplifted, relatively if not absolutely, but the uplift was differential, being greatest along the axis represented by _AB_, Fig. 167. The effect of the deformation was to stimulate the tributaries of the Ohio flowing north from this axis. Their growth was further accelerated by the weakness of the strata over which they ran. At the same time, the uplift to the south led the southwesterly flowing stream (_b_, Fig. 167) to discover relatively hard beds of rock in its lower course, and these beds retarded its down-cutting. The result was that a tributary of the Ohio (_a_, Fig. 167) finally tapped the main stream flowing to the southwest (_b_, Fig. 167) and carried its upper part over to the Ohio (Fig. 168). This was the beginning of the present Tennessee.

THE AGGRADATIONAL WORK OF RUNNING WATER.

=Principles involved.=—Since deposition results from the failure of transportation, the factors which control transportation also influence deposition. Transportation by streams is determined largely by velocity, and the most important factors influencing velocity are slope, volume, and load (p. 115). Of these the first two are usually of greater importance than the third.

A stream is said to be loaded when it has all the sediment it can carry; it is loaded with fine material when it has all the fine material it can carry, and with coarse material when it has all the coarse it can transport. A stream loaded with coarse material flows more swiftly than one loaded with fine, for a larger percentage of a stream’s energy can be utilized in carrying fine material than coarse, and hence a larger percentage of the energy of a stream which carries a load of the latter will express itself in velocity.

Deposition takes place whenever a stream finds itself with more load than it can carry, and is an expression of the stream’s refusal to remain overloaded. A stream may become overloaded in various ways. It might at first seem unnecessary to inquire whether a stream may be overloaded at its source, but the question is not necessarily to be answered in the negative. The source of a stream is not always a definite point. In a general way it may be said that the source of the normal stream is at that point in its valley where the bottom is as low as the ground-water level of the region. But since the ground-water level is not constant (p. 71) the source of a stream is likely to be farther up its valley in a wet season than in a dry one (p. 72). After a heavy shower, the run-off descends to the axis of the valley from the slopes on all sides, and temporarily the stream begins above the point which marks even its wet-season source. If under such circumstances the slopes about the head of the valley are notably steeper than the slope of the valley itself, as they frequently are, the water flowing down them may gather an amount of material which it cannot carry after it reaches the bottom of the valley. This may be the case at, or even above, the point which marks the source of the permanent stream. It is, therefore, possible for a stream to be overloaded at its source, if we take the source to be the point whence the water permanently flows. Deposition may, therefore, be taking place in a valley at the head of its permanent stream, or temporarily even in the valley above it.

Streams issuing from glaciers sometimes have more load than they can carry after they escape from the ice. If the stream be regarded as beginning at the point where it issues from beneath the ice it may be overloaded at its source.[69]

Under certain circumstances, a stream may overload itself. Thus if a stream loaded with coarse detritus reaches a portion of its valley where fine material is accessible in abundance, some of the velocity which is helping to carry the coarse may be used in picking up and carrying the fine. This reduces the velocity, and since the stream already had all the coarse material it could carry, reduction of velocity must result in deposition. It follows that when a stream fully loaded with coarse material picks up fine, it becomes overloaded, _so far as the coarse material is concerned_.

Again, tributaries may overload their mains. While tributaries are usually smaller than their mains, they frequently have higher gradients, and the smaller stream of higher gradient may bring to the larger stream of lower gradient more material than the latter can carry away. Thus deposition may take place at the point of junction of tributaries with their mains. This may go so far as to pond the latter enough to cause its expansion into a river-lake. Lake Pepin, in the Mississippi River at the mouth of the Chippewa (in Wis.), is an example.

Streams may become overloaded by losing velocity or volume, or both. Decrease in velocity is brought about either by decrease in declivity or in volume. In general, streams have lower gradients and greater volumes in their lower courses than in their upper, and these two elements affect velocity in different ways. If the increase in volume be not enough to counterbalance the decrease in declivity, as is often the case, a stream which is loaded in its upper course will deposit in its lower. The decrease of velocity at the debouchure of a stream almost always leads to deposition.

Decrease in velocity as the result of decrease in volume is less common. When decrease in volume occurs, it may be the result of (1) evaporation, (2) the absorption of water into the bed of the stream, or (3) branching—the giving off of _distributaries_. While evaporation is going on everywhere, the diminution of a stream by this means is usually more than balanced by the increase from tributaries, rainfall, and springs; but in arid regions a very different condition of things sometimes exists. If mountains in an arid region be capped with snow, its melting supplies the streams during the melting season. As the streams flow out from the mountains through dry regions, they receive little or no increment from rainfall, tributaries, or springs, and evaporation reduces the volume of water, or even dissipates it altogether. Absorption of water into the bed of the stream often accompanies evaporation. Reduction of volume by evaporation and by absorption is especially common in arid regions. Wherever loaded streams are reduced in volume, whether by evaporation or absorption, deposition takes place.

The third way by which velocity is decreased as the result of decreasing volume is illustrated at the debouchures of many streams. Near the Gulf, for example, the Mississippi branches repeatedly (see Fig. 190). The same phenomena are often seen where one stream joins another (Fig. 169). Individually the distributaries are much smaller than the main stream before they separated from it, and because they are smaller their combined surfaces are greater, and the amount of energy consumed in the friction of flow is increased. The velocity of the water and its carrying power are, therefore, reduced. Thus the branching of streams gives rise to deposition, and where deposition takes place the gradient of the stream is reduced, and this occasions still further deposition. The sediment which fills up the channel and checks the flow finally compels the stream, or some part of it, to transgress its banks. Deposition, therefore, favors the development of distributaries, and the development of distributaries in turn favors deposition.

The foregoing statements make it clear that a stream may be eroding in one part of its valley while it is depositing in another, and that erosion may alternate with deposition in the same place, on account of fluctuations in volume, and, therefore, in velocity of the stream. It will be seen in the sequel that erosion and deposition may be taking place at the same time in the same part of the valley. The activities of a river are so nicely balanced that slight disturbance at one point causes disturbance at all points below.

_The deposits._

=Types.=—Turning from the principles which underlie river deposition to the deposits themselves, they are found to occur in various situations. Running water usually descends from steeper slopes above to gentler slopes below, and ends at the sea, or in a lake or inland basin. Wherever there is a sudden decrease in its gradient, as at the base of a hill, ridge, or mountain, running water is likely to leave a large part of its load, building an _alluvial fan_ or _cone_ (Figs. 67, 68, and Pl. VI). Even where there is no sudden decrease in the gradient of a stream, there is likely to be a gradual one, and in spite of the fact that the increased volume of a stream in its lower course tends to overcome the effect of diminished gradient on velocity, deposition is likely to take place as the gradient is reduced. Deposits occasioned by the gradual reduction of a stream’s velocity often have great extent in the direction of a stream’s flow. They cover the flood plains of streams, making them _alluvial plains_ (Fig. 73). When a stream reaches the sea or a lake its current is destroyed and its load dropped, unless taken in charge by the waves and currents of the standing water. Sediment accumulated in quantity at the debouchures of streams gives rise to _deltas_ (Figs. 169, 187). Alluvial cones and fans, alluvial plains, and deltas, are the principal types of river deposits. Apart from these well-defined types there are _bars_ in the channels of depositing streams, and much ill-defined alluvium which does not allow of ready classification.

=Alluvial fans and cones.=—The only distinction between the alluvial fan and the alluvial cone is one of slope, the cones (they are but half-cones at best) being steeper than the fans. Alluvial fans and cones have their most striking development where temporary torrents, occasioned by showers or the rapid melting of snow, issue from mountain ravines. Such streams usually carry heavy loads of detritus, the coarser part of which is likely to be deposited at the base of the mountain slope. Cones and fans built by such streams have a periodic rather than a steady growth.

At the beginning of its development the material of the alluvial cone is deposited much as in a talus cone (compare Fig. 170 with Figs. 67 and 68). Its deposition chokes the channel of the stream, and some of the water then seeks new courses to right and left of the apex of the deposit. This expands the area of deposition to right and left, while the water which flows over it lengthens it in the direction of flow.

The course and behavior of the water after reaching an alluvial cone is instructive. As its velocity is checked, deposition often takes place in the channel, diminishing its capacity. As the channel is filled up, the water tends to overflow on either side. The overflowing water, being shallow, has so little velocity that much of its load is dropped on either margin of the channel, building up levees. The water ever and anon breaks through the levees, giving rise to distributary streams, each of which aggrades its channel and builds its own miniature levees (Fig. 171). Not rarely this process of channel-filling and levee-building goes on until the channels of the little rivulets are above the general level of the cone on which they rest. The rivulet then runs in a groove on the crest of a little ridge. The channels on the surfaces of fans and cones are fewest and deepest at their heads, and more numerous and shallower below. In some cases the surface-water disappears altogether before the outer border of the fan is reached, by sinking into the débris.

Alluvial fans and cones have various forms, and often attain considerable dimensions. Their angles of slope depend on the amount of reduction of velocity which the depositing water suffers, and the amount and kind of load which it carries. The maximum slope of the cone is the angle at which the loose material involved will lie. The minimum slope of the fan, on the other hand, approaches horizontality. If many alluvial fans develop in proximity to one another, as at the base of a mountain range, they may expand laterally until they merge. A long succession of them may thus give rise to an extensive _alluvial piedmont plain_, or a _compound alluvial fan_. The lower edge of such a fan is often somewhat lobate. Such plains exist along the bases of many mountain ranges (Pl. VI), and may be seen in miniature even along low ridges.

A permanent stream, as well as a temporary one, may develop an alluvial fan at the base of a mountain slope; but since the mountain course of the former is likely to be less steep than that of the latter, its waters suffer a correspondingly less reduction of velocity at any one point. The fan of the permanent stream is therefore likely to be relatively flat, and to stretch far down the valley. Such fans grade into valley plains. From the general principles already discussed, it is clear that well-developed fans go with relatively youthful stages of erosion, and belong normally to the upper parts of drainage lines.

=Ill-defined alluvium.=—There is a widespread mantle of alluvial material deposited by running water which was not organized into distinct streams. The water which runs down smooth slopes in sheets during showers carries fine earthy matter, as well as some that is coarser. These materials are largely deposited at the bases of the slopes, forming basal accumulations of greater or less extent, comparable in origin to alluvial fans. A relatively small amount of the slope wash is carried far out from the base of the declivities. It is not easy to realize the extent to which this process is taking place. There is hardly a slope without loose material, and there is hardly an acre of low land below a slope on which running water has not deposited sediment washed down from above. When it is remembered that this is as true of gentle slopes and their surroundings as of steep slopes, though perhaps not to the same extent, and that a very large part of the earth’s surface is made up of sensible slopes, or of flats at their bases, some idea of the aggregate effect may be gained.