Chapter VII: Notes

[117.1] Müller, _Frag. Hist. Gr._, ii. 497.

[117.2] _Vide_ Pinches, _op. cit._, p. 76.

[117.3] Jastrow, _op. cit._, p. 246.

[117.4] _Id._, p. 146.

[117.5] _Id._, p. 297.

[118.1] _Cities and Bishoprics of Phrygia_, p. 681.

[118.2] _Vide_ Margoliouth, _Life of Mahomet_, pp. 7, 8.

[119.1] _Keilinschr. Bibl._, iii. 1, p. 87.

[119.2] King, _Hammurabi_, pl. 191, no. 97, col. ii.; Jeremias, in Roscher, _Lexikon_, iv. p. 29, _s.v._ “Ramman.”

[119.3] Jeremias, _s.v._ “Nebo,” in Roscher, _op. cit._, iii. p. 62.

[119.4] Zimmern, _K.A.T._3, p. 379.

[120.1] Schiel in _Rev. de l’histoire des religions_, 1897, p. 207.

[120.2] Jeremias, _Bab. Assyr. Vorstellungen von dem Leben nach dem Tode_, p. 91.

[120.3] Zimmern, _K.A.T._3, p. 430.

[120.4] Jastrow, _op. cit._, vol. i. p. 34.

[120.5] Johns, _Babylonian and Assyrian Laws_, etc., p. 27.

[121.1] Reproduced on title-page of Winckler, _Die Gesetze Hammurabi_.

[121.2] Winckler, _op. cit._, p. 10.

[121.3] _Ib._, p. 39.

[121.4] _Keilinschr. Bibl._, ii. p. 47.

[121.5] _Vide_ Knudtzon, _Assyrische Gebete an den Sonnengott_, p. 241.

[121.6] _Vide_ Langdon, _Expositor_, 1909, p. 149; cf. Jeremias, _s.v._ “Nebo,” Roscher, _op. cit._, iii. p. 55.

[122.1] Jeremias, _Die Cultus-tafel von Sippar_.

[122.2] See Jeremias, Roscher, _Lexikon_, iii. pp. 62-63.

[122.3] _Op. cit._, p. 170.

[122.4] _Op. cit._, p. 223.

[122.5] _K.A.T._3, pp. 639-640.

[123.1] _Vide_ Hilprecht in _Babyl. Exped. Univ. Pennsylv._, vol. v. series D, pp. 24-29.

[123.2] _Vide_ Langdon, _Transactions of Congress of History of Religions_, vol. i. p. 251.

[123.3] _Keilinschr. Bibl._, iii. 1, p. 97.

[123.4] _Vide_ Frazer’s paragraph on the divine character of Semitic kings in _Adonis, Attis, Osiris_2, pp. 12-13.

[123.5] Lagrange, _Études sur les religions sémitiques_, p. 492.

[123.6] _Op. cit._, p. 481.

[124.1] _C. I. Sem._ 1, 1, 1 (cf. “Die Phönizischen Inschriften,” by Freiherr von Landau, in _Der Alte Orient_, 1907, p. 13).

[124.2] Ezek. xxix. 2, 9; quoted by Frazer, _supra_.

[124.3] The same figure which I interpret as the priest-king occurs in other religious scenes of Hittite sculpture; the type might often have been used for the priest pure and simple, as Dr. Frazer would always interpret it (_vide op. cit._, pp. 103-108).

[125.1] _Op. cit._, pp. 57-58.

[125.2] Strab., p. 535.

[125.3] _Vide_ Ramsay, _Hell. Journ._, x. p. 158; cf. Hyginus, 191 (Midas Rex Mydonius filius matris Deae).

[125.4] _Chil._, 1, 473; _vide_ Cook in _Class. Rev._, 1903, p. 408.

[126.1] _Vide_ my _Cults_, v. pp. 350-354; Frazer, _Journ. Philol._, xiv. “The Prytaneum, Temple of Vesta.”

[127.1] C. D. Gray, _The Samas Religious Texts_ (Brit. Mus.), Hymn 1.

[127.2] _Keilinschr. Bibl._, ii. p. 131.

[127.3] Cook, _Religions of Ancient Palestine_, p. 109.

[127.4] Jeremias, _Hölle u. Paradies_, p. 17.

[128.1] Sterrett, _Epigraphical Journey_, No. 65.

[128.2] Vide _Cults_, vol. v. p. 19.

[128.3] _Vide_ Frazer, _Psyche’s Task_, pp. 18-30.

[129.1] _Vide_ Winckler’s “Die Gesetze Hammurabi” in _Der Alte Orient_, 1906; an English version of the code in Johns’ _Babylonian and Assyrian Laws and Contracts_.

[130.1] The son of the slain man could claim compensation for manslaughter. In an Assyrian document a slave-girl is handed over to the son at the grave of the slain man. This is interesting, for it seems to point to some consideration for the feelings of the ghost (_vide_ Johns, _op. cit._, p. 116).

[132.1] _Vide_ Johns, _op. cit._, p. 77.

[132.2] _Op. cit._, p. 83.

[132.3] _Op. cit._, p. 85.

[132.4] _Op. cit._, p. 86.

[132.5] _Op. cit._, p. 90.

[133.1] Translated by Scheil in _Rev. de l’hist. des Religions_, 1897, p. 205.

[133.2] Zimmern in _K.A.T._3, p. 455; cf. his _Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Babyl. Religion_, ii. p. 147, “for the House-God, the House-Goddess, for the House-daimon thou shalt erect three altars.”

[134.1] For exceptions, _vide infra_, pp. 213, 217.

[134.2] _Vide_ Johns, _op. cit._, p. 133; quoting from paper by Dr. Pinches in _Proceedings of the Victoria Institute_, 1892-93, “Notes on some recent Discoveries in the Realm of Assyriology.”

[134.3] Johns, _op. cit._, p. 154, etc., treats Babylonian adoption wholly as a secular business based on secular feelings.

[136.1] _Il._, 18, 505.

[137.1] _Od._, 3, 215.

[137.2] Vide _Cults_, iv. pp. 201-202.

[137.3] _Ib._, p. 202.

[137.4] _Ib._, pp. 104-106.

[138.1] _Vide_ my _Cults_, iii. pp. 80-81.

[138.2] _Ib._, pp. 53-55.

[138.3] _Vide supra_, pp. 129-131.

[139.1] _Vide_ my _Cults_, v. p. 345.

[139.2] _Evolution of Religion_, pp. 139-152.