Chapter L: P. LANE: It seems to me it would be most desirable to harmonize the
practice of the Superintendent of Documents with the Library of Congress in this matter. In the "Comprehensive catalogue" there is this inversion, and it seems to me it has been very judiciously done. In the present practice of the Boston Public Library, however, it is not done.
Miss AMBROSE: I should like a definition of the word "local" in 1 i 20.
Mr. HANSON: 1 i 20: "Purely local benevolent or moral or similar societies under the place."
Mr. Cutter said that he had more trouble with this rule than with any other. He had, in fact, I believe decided to enter under name, not under place, but it seems during the discussion he changed back to the old rule.
Miss KROEGER: That was in deference to the majority vote. Mr. Cutter's opinion favored entry under name.
Mr. HANSON: His reason seemed to be that those referring to these local societies were the citizens of the place where they were situated and they sought the name of the society. If the people in other states, using other catalogs, were looking for the societies, they would not remember the name. In fact, the only thing that remains in one's memory is the name of the place, and one naturally would look under the place for it.
CHAIRMAN: As I understand Miss Ambrose she raises the question how large a locality might be meant--whether it should go to the limits of a county or a state. I should have supposed it meant a narrower locality and would apply to a city or town--a vicinage.
Mr. JOSEPHSON: Perhaps it might be well to let the word "local" mean here what it means in "local geography"--anything belonging to the state--not taking in towns.
I should like to bring up 1 k: "Enter commentaries accompanied by the full text of the work under the name of the author." And then exceptions only when the text is not to be readily distinguished from the commentary. We have a good many cases where the text is particularly short--a text of from four or five or ten pages--and then comes a commentary of several hundred pages. It seems absurd to catalog a text of five or ten pages accompanied by a commentary of five or six hundred pages under the name of the author of the text.
Miss KROEGER: That is provided for in the rule. "Except when the text is distributed through the commentary in such a manner as not to be readily recognized or is insignificant as compared with the commentary." That is designed to fit just such cases.
Mr. HANSON: There is another rule, on laws, 1 h 3: "Laws on one or more particular subjects, whether digested or merely collected, to be entered under the collector or digester, with added entry under country."
I think that is a departure from the present practice, which has been to enter New York laws on state taxation under New York, State Legislature, and secondly under compiler or collector.
Miss AMBROSE: If you had a compilation of road laws of Illinois, you would put that under the compiler first and secondly under Illinois State Legislature?
Mr. HANSON: Yes.
Comments
Log in to leave a comment.
Papers and Proceedings of the Twenty-Third General Meeting of the American Library AssociationChapter L: P. LANE: It seems to me it would be most desirable to harmonize the
0%2 min left in chapter