Chapter XIX: Appendix: To Ctenophora (2)
(_b_) SPINES.—The spines vary more than any other part of the skeleton. They may be close set and small, or few and large, and often bear spines of the second order, or spinelets, attached to them. In _Asterias_ and its allies they are {455}comparatively short, blunt tubercles, covered with thick skin. In the Echinasteridae and Asterinidae they are short and blunt, but they are very numerous and thick set. In the Solasteridae they are long, and arranged in bundles diverging from a common base. Such bundles may be termed sheaves, and starting from an arrangement like this, two distinct lines of modification may be traced. Thus (1) the members of a sheaf become connected by a web of skin, so that the sheaf becomes an umbrella, and successive umbrellas may adhere, so that a supra-dorsal tent is formed (a structure characteristic of the Pterasteridae), or (2) the members of a sheaf may become arranged in a circle round a central vertical axis so that a structure like a capstan is produced, which is called a "paxilla" (characteristic of Astropectinidae, Porcellanasteridae, and Archasteridae). The axis,[453] as shown by its development, represents the plate which bore the bundle of spines. Again, the skeleton may consist of plates with a close covering of granules (Pentagonasteridae, etc.). Lastly, in _Porania_ spines are absent, the plates being deeply embedded in a thick leathery skin.
{456}(_c_) PEDICELLARIAE.—These are to be looked on as spines of the second order. In _Asterina_ and its allies they are not present, but groups of little spines arranged in twos and threes, each group being attached to a special small plate, are scattered over the aboral surface; and these on irritation approach one another, and represent the rudiment out of which pedicellariae have been developed. The most perfect form, termed "forcipulate," in which there is a basal ossicle, is found in Asteriidae, Brisingidae, Heliasteridae, Pedicellasteridae, Zoroasteridae, Stichasteridae. There are two varieties of forcipulate pedicellariae, the "crossed" and the "straight," which have been described on p. 432. In all other cases the pedicellariae are devoid of the basal ossicle, and the two or more spinelets forming the jaws are directly attached to one of the main plates of the skeleton.
The simplest variety is termed "pectinate"; these pedicellariae are composed of two parallel rows of small spines opposed to each other. They are found in the Archasteridae, and are hardly more advanced in structure than the groups of spines found in _Asterina_. In _Leptogonaster_ and its allies there are pincer-shaped pedicellariae composed of two curved rods articulating with one of the plates of the skeleton, and also "alveolate" pedicellariae, composed of two short prongs which are implanted on a concave tubercle borne on one of the plates of the skeleton. In the Antheneidae every plate of the ventral surface bears a large "valvate" pedicellaria consisting of two horizontally elongated ridges, which can meet one another. It is possible that valvate pedicellariae have been derived from a pectinate form in which successive spinules of one row have become adherent.
(_d_) AMBULACRAL SKELETON.—In every case, whether spines are developed elsewhere or not, the adambulacral plates bear spines. Where the spines are elsewhere represented by granules (_Nardoa_ and its allies) (Fig. 194, D) the adambulacral spines are {457}short and blunt. The terms "monacanthid" and "diplacanthid" are used to express the occurrence of one or two rows of spines respectively on each adambulacral plate.
In the Zoroasteridae the adambulacral plates are curved, and are alternately convex and concave towards the ambulacral groove, so that this groove presents a wavy outline.
In the description of _Asterias_ it was pointed out that the first adambulacral plates in adjacent radii are closely approximated to one another, and bear spines which can to some extent form a trellis-work over the mouth. In very many species not only is this the case, but the plates themselves project inwards over the mouth so as to form prominent "mouth-angles." This is not the case in the Asteriidae or the allied families.
PAPULAE.—In Asteriidae and many allied families these organs are found both on the upper and under surface of the disc, but in another large group consisting of Astropectinidae, Pentacerotidae, and allied families, papulae are only borne on the dorsal surface, and, in some cases, are restricted to a few groups at the base of the arms. In most Asteroidea the papulae are arranged singly, that is to say, each occupies one of the interspaces between the plates of the skeleton, but in _Asterias_ and some other genera they are arranged in tufts of two or three.
WATER-VASCULAR SYSTEM.—In its general structure this system of organs is very constant, the two most important variations being found, one, in Asteriidae and a few allied families, and the other, in the Astropectinidae and the families allied to them.
The first of the variations alluded to concerns the number of the tube-feet in a radius. In _Asterias_ and its allies these are so numerous that there is not room for them one behind the other, but they follow one another in a zigzag line, the transverse canals connecting them with the radial canals being alternately longer and shorter. In this way the appearance of four rows of tube-feet is produced, and the advantage of this increase in number can be recognised by any one who has compared the quick movements of _Asterias_ and the slow ones of a _Cribrella_, for instance.
The second important variation referred to is the complete loss of the sucker of the tube-foot, and, concomitantly, the loss {458}of the power of climbing. Starfish which have undergone this change live on sandy bottoms and run over the surface of the sand. They are also incapable of forcing asunder the valves of Molluscs, and hence are compelled to swallow their prey whole.
"Polian vesicles," or stalked sac-like outgrowths of the water-vascular ring, are absent from the Asteriidae, but are found in many families—the Asterinidae, Solasteridae, Astropectinidae, for example. They project outwards from the water-vascular ring in the interradii; when there are several present in one interradius they often arise from a common stalk. Cuénot believes that their sole function, like that of Tiedemann's bodies, is to produce amoebocytes, but this appears unlikely. It is more probable that they act as store-houses of fluid for the water-vascular ring.
The stone-canal is rarely repeated, but this occurs in the aberrant genus _Acanthaster_, where there may even be several in one interradius, and each stone-canal has an axial sinus, genital stolon, and madreporite annexed to it. According to Cuénot, in _Asterias_, when 6-rayed specimens occur in a species normally 5-rayed, there are two stone-canals, suggesting that the repetition of stone-canals is a suppressed effort at multiplication by division. This is also true of _Echinaster_, but in _Ophidiaster_ two madreporites may occur in an individual with five arms. In the Asterinidae the Y-shaped fold which projects into the cavity of the stone-canal is feebly developed, whereas in the Pentacerotidae it meets the opposite side of the stone-canal, and in _Culcita_ gives out branches which reduce the cavity of the canal to a series of channels. In Echinasteridae and some Asterinidae, and in Astropectinidae and Pentacerotidae the ampullae become so deeply indented as to be almost divided into two, so that each tube-foot has virtually two ampullae.
The ALIMENTARY CANAL has a remarkably constant structure. {459}The only important variation from the type, as described in _Asterias_, is found amongst the Astropectinidae and Porcellanasteridae, where the anus is wanting. In _Astropecten_ the rectum and the rectal caeca still persist, but in _Luidia_ even these have disappeared. The rectal caeca are remarkably variable structures. In _Asterias_ there are two, but in Pentacerotidae there are five forked caeca, in _Asterina_ five simple caeca, and in the Echinasteridae and Astropectinidae one large flat slightly 5-lobed caecum. In the Asterinidae the pyloric caeca are remarkable for the size of the enlarged basal portion in each radius, which serves as a reservoir for the juices secreted by the branched forks of the caecum. In _Porcellanaster pacificus_ the pyloric caeca are vestigial, and in _Hyphalaster moseri_ they are absent.[454]
The GENITAL ORGANS are, as we have seen, outgrowths from radial branches of the genital rachis. In most species, as in _Asterias_, they are limited to a single cluster of tubes on each branch of the rachis, but in the Astropectinidae and Pentacerotidae each branch gives rise to a large number of clusters, arranged in longitudinal series, each cluster having its independent opening to the exterior.
ASEXUAL REPRODUCTION, as a regular occurrence, is not common amongst Asteroidea. If, however, a Starfish loses some of its arms, it has the power of regenerating the missing members. Even a single arm will regenerate the whole Starfish. Now in some cases (Astropectinidae, Linckiidae) Starfish will readily snap off their arms on irritation. In _Linckia_ this occurs at regular intervals and the separated arm forms a new individual. In one of the Asterinidae, _Asterina wega_, a small Starfish with seven arms, transverse fission regularly occurs, a portion with three arms separating from one with four. The same is believed to occur in two species of _Asterias_, and as has already been pointed out, the repetition of the madreporite and stone-canal is, in many cases, possibly connected with this tendency to transverse fission.
CLASSIFICATION OF ASTEROIDEA.
Whilst there is considerable agreement amongst the authorities as to the number of families, or minor divisions of unequivocal {460}relationship, to be found in the class Asteroidea, there has been great uncertainty both as to the number and limits of the orders into which the class should be divided, and also as to the limits of the various species. The difficulty about the species is by no means confined to the group Echinodermata; in all cases where the attempt is made to determine species by an examination of a few specimens of unknown age there is bound to be uncertainty; the more so, as it becomes increasingly evident that there is no sharp line to be drawn between local varieties and species. In Echinodermata, however, there is the additional difficulty that the acquisition of ripe genital cells does not necessarily mark the termination of growth; the animals can continue to grow and at the same time slightly alter their characters. For this reason many of the species described may be merely immature forms. In proportion, however, as the collections from various localities increase in number and size, difficulties connected with species will tend to disappear.
The disputes, however, as to the number of orders included in the Asteroidea proceed from a different cause. The attempt to construct detailed phylogenies involves the assumption that one set of structures, which we take as the mark of the class, has remained constant, whilst others which are regarded as adaptive, may have been developed twice or thrice. As the two sets of structures are often of about equal importance it will be seen to what an enormous extent the personal equation enters in the determination of these questions.
Where, as in Asteroidea, the internal organisation is very uniform, the best method of classification is to take as our basis the different methods in which the demands of the environment have been met. It is in this way, we hold, that divergence of character has been produced, for whilst species may differ in trifling details, families and orders differ in points of functional importance. The fact that one of the orders may have sprung from several allied species instead of one may be admitted, and at the same time the hopelessness of trying to push phylogenetic inference into details asserted.
Sladen, in his Monograph of the Asteroidea collected by the "Challenger" expedition, took for the basis of his system the presence or absence of distinct pavement-like marginal plates along the edges of the arms and the restriction of the papulae to {461}the aboral surface, or their distribution over the whole surface of the body. What connexion, if any, the presence of these pavement-like plates has with the habits it is impossible to say, but it is unlikely to be of the high importance with which it was regarded by Sladen, for in the same family we have genera with inconspicuous marginals (_Asterina_) and others with conspicuous marginals (_Palmipes_). The restriction of the papulae to the back also varies within the same family (Linckiidae), and whilst, on the whole, it is perhaps a primitive arrangement, it is in many cases connected with burrowing habits, which can scarcely be deemed to have been the original mode of life of the class.
A far better basis is supplied by the system of Perrier,[455] who divides the Asteroidea into five orders according to the character of the dorsal skeleton; and this classification really corresponds with the different habits assumed by groups of Asteroidea in order to meet what must be regarded as one of their chief dangers, viz. assaults by other animals, especially parasites, on their soft and delicate skins. Since the food (so far as is known) of all Asteroidea is more or less similar, the great differentiating factor in their development must have been the means they adopt to shelter themselves from their enemies. Perrier's classification, which we shall adopt, is as follows:—
ORDER 1. SPINULOSA.—Asteroidea in which the plates of the dorsal skeleton bear spines arranged singly or in groups. The tube-feet have suckers and there are no pedicellariae. Marginals sometimes conspicuous, sometimes rod-like.
ORDER 2. VELATA.—Asteroidea in which the dorsal surface of the animal is concealed from view by a false membrane composed of the webs of skin stretched between diverging groups of spines united at the base with one another. No pedicellariae. Tube-feet with suckers.
ORDER 3. PAXILLOSA.—Asteroidea in which the dorsal surface is beset with paxillae (upright spines bearing two or three circles of horizontal spinelets). Pedicellariae, when present, few, and never of the forcipulate variety; often absent. Marginals large. Papulae only on dorsal surface. Tube-feet mostly devoid of suckers.
ORDER 4. VALVATA.—Asteroidea in which the dorsal surface {462}is protected by plates covered with a mail of minute granules. Pedicellariae of the valvate or alveolate type. Marginals large.
ORDER 5. FORCIPULATA.—Asteroidea in which the dorsal surface is beset with small spines surrounded by numerous forcipulate pedicellariae. Tube-feet with suckers and arranged in four rows. Marginals rod-like and inconspicuous.
ORDER I. SPINULOSA.
This is by far the most primitive order of Asteroidea. The tube-feet are arranged in two rows only, and there is no special means of protecting the back, other than the small close-set plates bearing spines, with which it is covered. In some cases, as _Asterina_, these spines have a tendency to converge when irritated, and thus act somewhat like pedicellariae. This circumstance suggests strongly the manner in which pedicellariae have been developed from small groups of spines. The order is divided into six families, of which four have common representatives on the British coast.
FAM. 1. ECHINASTERIDAE.—Spinulosa in which the aboral skeleton is composed of close set plates bearing comparatively small spines. This family is represented on the British coasts by the beautiful scarlet Starfish _Cribrella_ (_Henricia_) _sanguinolenta_. It is also found on the Norwegian coast and on the east coast of North America. On the Pacific coast it is replaced by a larger species, _C. laeviuscula_. The narrow ambulacral grooves and sluggish movements at once distinguish it from the Starfish described as the type. Indeed, all the Spinulosa seem to be slow in their movements in contrast to the comparatively active _Asterias_ and its allies. _Cribrella_ is remarkable for its large eggs, which have a rapid development. The larva never swims at the surface but glides only for a short time over the bottom. _Echinaster_ is an allied genus in which each plate bears a single somewhat enlarged spine. It possesses on the skin of the aboral surface numerous pits lined by glandular walls, which probably secrete a poisonous fluid which defends it. _Acanthaster_ has thorny spines, more than ten arms, and several stone-canals and madreporites.
FAM. 2. SOLASTERIDAE.—Spinulosa in which the aboral skeleton is a network of rods. Spines arranged in diverging bundles {463}(sheaves) attached to a basal button. This family includes the well-known "Sun-stars," with numerous arms and a wide peristome. There are two species found on both sides of the Atlantic. _Solaster papposus_, with thirteen or fourteen arms and long bundles of spines on the dorsal surface, which is of an orange colour variegated with yellow, and _S. endeca_ with eleven rays and shorter spines and of a reddish violet colour. _Rhipidaster_ has eight arms. Some genera have, however, only five arms, as, for instance, _Peribolaster_ and _Korethraster_ (Fig. 197). In this family there are conspicuous "Polian vesicles" attached to the water-vascular ring.
FAM. 3. ASTERINIDAE.—Spinulosa in which the aboral skeleton consists of overlapping plates, each bearing a few small spines. The common British representative of this family is the small _Asterina gibbosa_, in which the arms are short and stout and of somewhat unequal length. This Starfish differs from most of its allies in being littoral in its habit. At low tide on the south and west coasts of England it can be found on the underside of stones feeding on the Sponges and Ascidians with which they are covered. Like _Cribrella sanguinolenta_ this species has a modified development. The larva resembles that of _Cribrella_, and the larval stage only lasts about a week. Owing to the fact that {464}_Asterina_ lays its eggs in accessible localities, its development has been more thoroughly worked out than that of any other species. _Palmipes membranaceus_, an animal of extraordinary thinness and flatness, is sometimes dredged up off the coast of Britain in deeper water. Its arms are so short that the general form is pentagonal. The infero-marginal plates are long and rod-like, and form a conspicuous border to the body when viewed from below.
FAM. 4. PORANIIDAE.—Spinulosa allied to the Asterinidae but possessing a thick gelatinous body-wall in which the plates and spines are buried, the marginals forming a conspicuous border to the body. This family is represented in British waters only by _Porania pulvillus_, a cushion-shaped Starfish with very short arms and of a magnificent reddish-purple colour. It is occasionally, but rarely, exposed at low tide.
FAM. 5. GANERIIDAE.—Spinulosa allied to the Asterinidae but distinguished by the large marginals and by the fact that the skeleton of the oral surface consists of plates each bearing a few large spines. _Ganeria_, _Marginaster_.
FAM. 6. MITHRODIIDAE.—Spinulosa with a reticulate aboral skeleton. The spines are large and blunt, covered with minute spinules. _Mithrodia_, sole genus.
These last two families are not represented in British waters.
ORDER II. VELATA.
This is a very extraordinary group of Starfish, about the habits of which nothing is known, since they all live at very considerable depths. Their nearest allies amongst the Spinulosa must be looked for amongst the Solasteridae. If the sheaves of spines with which the latter family are provided were to become adherent at their bases, and connected with webs of skin so as to form umbrella-like structures, and if then these umbrellas were to become united at their edges, we should have a supra-dorsal membrane formed such as is characteristic of the order.
FAM. 1. PYTHONASTERIDAE.—Velata in which each sheaf of spines is enveloped in a globular expansion of the skin and is not united with the neighbouring sheaves. _Pythonaster_, sole genus.
FAM. 2. MYXASTERIDAE.—Velata with numerous arms in which the sheaves of spines are long and form with their connecting "umbrellas" web-like expansions which do not fuse with one another. _Myxaster_, sole genus.
{465}
{466}FAM. 3. PTERASTERIDAE.—Velata in which the membranes supported by the sheaves of spines are united so as to form a continuous supra-dorsal tent. The Pterasteridae are represented in British waters by a single species, _Pteraster militaris_, which is occasionally dredged in deep water off the British coast, and is found also in the Norwegian fjords and off the east coast of Canada. This interesting Starfish has five short, blunt arms, and its general appearance at first sight recalls that of _Asterina_. Closer inspection reveals the "false back." The anus is surrounded by five fan-like valves, supported by spines (Fig. 198), underneath which is a space in which the young complete their development, _Pteraster_ being one of the genera in which the normal larval form is not developed. The tendency towards the union of adjacent spines by webs is deeply rooted in the organisation of the animal. It is seen on the under side where the spines borne by the ventral plates are united so as to form transverse combs. In _Hymenaster_ (Fig. 199) the spines borne by the ventral plates are long and free.
ORDER III. PAXILLOSA.
This is an exceedingly well-marked order. The armature of the upper surface consists of paxillae. These organs as already mentioned are probably to be traced back to sheaves of spines like those of the Solasteridae. The same end as that striven after in the case of the Velata has been attained, but in a different way. The horizontal spinelets of the paxillae meet one another and form a close-fitting mail which is almost as efficient a protection as the webs and umbrellas of the Velata. Pedicellariae are occasionally present, but they are always of the pectinate or pincer variety, never forcipulate.
FAM. 1. ARCHASTERIDAE.—Paxillosa in which the anus is still retained and in which the tube-feet have suckers.
The Archasteridae are a most interesting family. Thus _Pararchaster_ has no true paxillae, but only small isolated groups of spines. The pectinate pedicellariae are composed each of two parallel rows of somewhat smaller spines. The members of this family are to some extent intermediate in structure between the {467}Spinulosa, such as Echinasteridae, and the other families of the Paxillosa—some genera, indeed, might almost be classed as Spinulosa. At the same time they are apparently closely allied with the more primitive Valvata such as _Astrogonium_ and its allies, some of which have paxillae on the upper surface; although the retention of the anus and of the suckers on the tube-feet (in which characters they agree with the Archasteridae) distinguishes them from the more typical Paxillosa, in which both anus and suckers are lost. _Archaster_ (Figs. 200, 201). _Leptogonaster._
FAM. 2. ASTROPECTINIDAE.—Paxillosa which have lost the anus, but which possess neither aboral protuberance nor interradial grooves. The marginal plates are thick, covered with spinules and placed horizontally. The tube-feet have no suckers.
This family is the only one of the order which occurs in British waters, where it is represented by two genera, _Astropecten_ and _Luidia_. In _Astropecten_ the inferior marginal plate is in {468}immediate contact with the adambulacral, whilst in _Luidia_ it is separated from it by a small intermediate plate.
_Astropecten irregularis_ is a very common species on the coast of Britain, and a study of its habits when in captivity has thrown a great deal of light on many obscure points in the anatomy of the Paxillosa. Owing to the loss of suckers it is unable to climb over rocks and stones like the ordinary species, but it runs over the surface of the hard sand in which it lives by means of its pointed tube-feet. The arms are highly muscular, and the animal when laid on its back rights itself by throwing the arms upwards and gradually overbalancing itself. The loss of suckers has also rendered _Astropecten_ and its allies incapable of feeding in the manner described in the case of _Asterias rubens_. They are unable forcibly to open the valves of shell-fish, and the only resource left to them is to swallow their prey whole. The mouth is consequently wide, and the {469}unfortunate victims, once inside the stomach, are compelled by suffocation to open sooner or later, when they are digested.[456]
Many interesting experiments have been made on _Astropecten_ by Preyer and other investigators, but one important fact[457] has escaped their notice, that _Astropecten_, when at rest, lies buried in the sand, whilst the centre of the aboral surface is raised into a cone which projects above the surface. On the sides of this cone the few papulae which this species possesses are distributed. This raising of the aboral surface is obviously an expedient to facilitate respiration. It loosens the sand over the region of the papulae, and thus allows the water to have access to them. We can thus understand how the restriction of the papulae to the dorsal surface, so characteristic of the Paxillosa, is not always as Sladen imagined, a primitive characteristic, but often an adaptation to the burrowing habits which in all probability are characteristic of the whole order. In both _Luidia_ and _Astropecten_ Cuénot has described short spines covered with cilia in {470}the interspaces between the marginal plates, these also subserve respiration by drawing a current of water over the gills. _Psilaster_ (Fig. 202).
FAM. 3. PORCELLANASTERIDAE.—Paxillosa which have lost the anus. There is a conical prominence in the centre of the dorsal surface termed the epiproctal cone, and in the interradial angles there are vertical grooves bordered by folds of membrane produced into papillae, the so-called "cribriform organs." The marginal plates are thin and form the vertical border of the thick disc. The tube-feet have no suckers.
Comparing the Porcellanasteridae with the Astropectinidae we see at once that the "epiproctal cone" is a permanent representative of the temporary aboral elevation in _Astropecten_, and we are inclined to suspect that the cribriform organs are grooves lined with cilia which keep up a respiratory current like the ciliated {471}spines of _Luidia_. In all probability the Porcellanasteridae are more habitual burrowers than even the Astropectinidae.
_Ctenodiscus_ (Fig. 196), a genus in which there is a short epiproctal cone and numerous feeble cribriform organs in each interradius, is found in deep water north of the Shetland Islands. _Porcellanaster_ (Fig. 203) is a more typical genus, with one large cribriform organ in each interradius. _Hyphalaster_ has long arms, on which the supero-marginal plates meet above.
ORDER IV. VALVATA.
The Starfish included in this order are characterised by the absence of prominent spines and by the superficial covering of minute granules. The skeleton consists, in most cases, of plates, and these plates with their covering of granules probably represent the first stage in the evolution of paxillae.
The tube-feet possess well-developed suckers. No members of this order can properly be said to be British.
FAM. 1. LINCKIIDAE.—Valvata with long arms, the marginals being developed equally throughout the whole length. These Starfish are distinguished by their long narrow arms and small disc. It is possible that these forms, so different in many respects from the other families of the order, have been directly derived from the long-armed Echinasteridae. _Ophidiaster_, _Nardoa_, _Linckia_.
FAM. 2. PENTAGONASTERIDAE.—Valvata with short arms, the marginals being especially developed at the base and in the interradial angles. The aboral skeleton consists of close-fitting plates. _Pentagonaster_ (Fig. 204), _Astrogonium_.
FAM. 3. GYMNASTERIDAE.—Valvata allied to the foregoing but distinguished by possessing a very thick skin in which the plates are completely buried. _Dermasterias_, _Asteropsis_.
FAM. 4. ANTHENEIDAE.—Valvata with short arms. The dorsal skeleton is reticulate and each ventral plate bears one or several large valvular pedicellariae (Fig. 195, C). _Hippasterias_, _Goniaster_.
FAM. 5. PENTACEROTIDAE.—Valvata with arms of moderate length. The dorsal skeleton is reticulate but the ventral plates bear only small pedicellariae or none. The upper marginals are smaller than the ventral ones.
The Pentacerotidae include both short-armed and long-armed {472}forms. Amongst the former is _Culcita_, in which the body is a pentagonal disc, all outer trace of the arms being lost; _Pentaceros_ is a long-armed form.
The family Pentagonasteridae furnishes the key to the understanding of most of the forms contained in this order. It contains genera such as _Astrogonium_ which possess on the back unmistakable paxillae, whilst on the under surface they have the characteristic covering of granules; these genera seem to be closely allied to the short-armed species of the Archasteridae, from which they are distinguished chiefly by the granular covering of the marginals. From a study of these cases it seems clear that the plates of the dorsal skeleton of the Valvata correspond to the supporting knobs of the paxillae much broadened out, and the granules correspond to the spinelets of the paxillae increased in number and diminished in size.
{473}As mentioned above, Ludwig has proved that the paxillae develop in the life-history of the individual out of ordinary plates, the axis of the paxilla representing the plate.
ORDER V. FORCIPULATA.
This order, which includes the most highly developed members of the class Asteroidea, is at once distinguished by the possession of forcipulate pedicellariae which, as we have seen, possess a well-marked basal piece with which the two plates articulate. The pedicellariae are consequently sharply marked off from the spinelets, and no intermediate forms occur. The first conjoined adambulacrals, which in other orders form the "teeth" or mouth-angles, do not here project beyond the first pairs of ambulacral plates.
FAM. 1. ASTERIIDAE.—Forcipulata in which the tube-feet are apparently arranged in four rows. Aboral skeleton a loose reticulum.
The general features of the family Asteriidae have been explained in the description of _Asterias rubens_ (p. 432). There are five well-marked species of the genus found on the British coasts. Of these _A. glacialis_ is found chiefly in the south-western parts of the English Channel. It is a large Starfish of a purplish-grey colour, with large spines surrounded by cushions of pedicellariae arranged in one or two rows down each arm. _A. muelleri_ resembles the foregoing species, but is of much smaller size, and is further distinguished by having straight pedicellariae in the neighbourhood of the ambulacral groove only. It is found on the east coast of Scotland, and carries its comparatively large eggs about with it until development is completed. _A. rubens_ is the commonest species, and is found on both east and west coasts. Its colour is a bright orange, but varies to almost a straw colour. It is at once distinguished from the foregoing species by the spines of the dorsal surface, which are small and numerous, an irregular line of somewhat larger ones being sometimes seen down the centre of each arm. _A. murrayi_ is a peculiar species restricted to the west coast of Scotland and Ireland. It has flattened arms, with vertical sides, and only three rows of small spines on the dorsal surface. It is of a violet colour. _A. hispida_ is also a western species. It is a {474}small Starfish with short stout arms; there are no straight pedicellariae, and only a few sharp spines on the dorsal surface.
On the eastern coast of North America there are several species of _Asterias_, of which the most noteworthy is the 6-rayed _A. polaris_ of the Gulf of St. Lawrence. This species exhibits a marvellous range of colour-variation, ranging from bluish-violet through purple to red and straw-coloured. This variation seems to show that colour, as such, is of no importance to the animal, but probably depends on some compound of slightly varying composition which is being carried by the amoebocytes towards the exterior. On the Pacific coast there is a rich fauna of Starfish, among which we may mention as members of this family _Asterias ochracea_, a large violet species, so strong that it requires a severe wrench to detach it from the rock, and _Pycnopodia_ with twenty-two arms.
FAM. 2. HELIASTERIDAE.—Forcipulata allied to the Asteriidae, but with very numerous arms and double interradial septa. _Heliaster._
FAM. 3. ZOROASTERIDAE.—Forcipulata with the tube-feet in four rows at the base of the arm, in two rows at the tip. Aboral skeleton of almost contiguous plates bearing small spines or flattened scales. _Zoroaster_, _Pholidaster_.
FAM. 4. STICHASTERIDAE.—Forcipulata with the tube-feet in four rows. Aboral skeleton of almost contiguous plates covered with granules. _Stichaster_, _Tarsaster_.
The Stichasteridae and Zoroasteridae have acquired a superficial resemblance to some of the long-armed Valvata, from which they are at once distinguished by their pedicellariae. It would be exceedingly interesting if more could be found out concerning the normal environment of these animals; it might then be possible to discover what is the cause of the assumption of this uniform mail of plates.
FAM. 5. PEDICELLASTERIDAE.—Forcipulata with two rows of tube-feet. The aboral skeleton bears projecting spines surrounded by cushions of straight pedicellariae. _Pedicellaster_, _Coronaster_.
FAM. 6. BRISINGIDAE.—Forcipulata with numerous arms and only two rows of tube-feet. Aboral skeleton largely rudimentary and confined to the base of the arms. The small blunt spines are contained in sacs of skin covered with pedicellariae.
The Brisingidae, including _Brisinga_ and _Odinia_, are a very {475}remarkable family, chiefly on account of the smallness of the disc and of the extraordinary length of the arms. The arms have what we must consider to have been the primitive arrangement, since there is no lateral adhesion between them, and interbrachial septa are consequently entirely absent. The reduction of the skeleton is a very marked peculiarity and, like the tendency to the reduction of the skeleton of deep-sea fish, may stand in some relation to the great pressure under which the animals live.
FOSSIL ASTEROIDEA.
The Asteroidea occur somewhat plentifully as fossils. In the Lower Jurassic _Asterias_, _Astropecten_, _Luidia_, _Solaster_, and _Goniaster_ have already made their appearance. In the Cretaceous {476}_Pentaceros_ appears. In the older rocks occur a number of forms of different character from any now existing. Of these _Aspidosoma_ (Fig. 206), with short lancet-shaped arms sharply distinguished from the disc and continued along its under surface, seems to be intermediate between Asteroidea and Ophiuroidea. The skeleton of the arm is composed of alternating ambulacral ossicles bordered by adambulacral ossicles, which are at the same time marginals and sharply distinguished from the marginals forming the edge of the disc. _Palaeaster_, on the other hand, is a true Asteroid; there are marginals distinct from the adambulacrals, but the disc is reduced to its smallest dimensions, there being only one plate on the ventral side of each interradius. There are a number of genera (_Palaeocoma_, for instance) with a large disc and very short arms and very shallow ambulacral grooves; all have alternating ambulacral plates. Some genera appear to have had the madreporite on the ventral surface of an interradius. On the other hand, in the Devonian occurs _Xenaster_, which was a fairly normal Asteroid, with pavement-like marginals, deep ambulacral grooves, and broad arms.
Thus it will be seen that already in Jurassic times the three orders, Forcipulata, Paxillosa, and Spinulosa were differentiated from each other, but how these are related to the older Palaeozoic forms it is at present impossible to say.
{477}CHAPTER XVII
ECHINODERMATA (_CONTINUED_): OPHIUROIDEA = BRITTLE STARS
CLASS II. OPHIUROIDEA
The second class of Eleutherozoa are familiarly known as "Brittle Stars," on account of their tendency, when seized, to escape by snapping off an arm, although this habit is by no means confined to them, but is shared in a marked degree by many Asteroidea, such as _Luidia_, for instance. Like the Asteroidea, they are "starfish," that is to say, they consist of a disc and of arms radiating from it; but the scientific name Ophiuroidea really expresses the great dominating feature of their organisation. Literally it signifies "Snake-tail" (ὄφις, snake; οὐρά, tail), and thus vividly describes the wriggling, writhing movements of the long thin arms, by means of which the Ophiuroid climbs in and out of the crevices between the stones and gravel in which it lives. This feature, viz. the effecting of movement by means of muscular jerks of the arms, instead of by the slow protrusion and retraction of the tube-feet, is the key to the understanding of most of the points wherein the Brittle Stars differ from the true Starfish.
Asteroidea and Ophiuroidea agree in the common ground-plan of their structure, that is, they both possess arms; but the most obvious difference in their outer appearance is that whereas in Asteroidea the arms merge insensibly into the disc, in Ophiuroidea the disc is circular in outline and is sharply marked off from the arms. Closer inspection shows that in the Ophiuroid the arms are continued inwards along grooves, which run on the under surface of the disc, and that they finally coalesce to form a buccal framework surrounding the mouth. In {478}the very young Ophiuroid the arms melt into a small central disc, as in the Starfish, but the disc of the adult is made up of a series of interradial dorsal outgrowths which meet one another above the arms.
{479}
One of the commonest British Ophiuroids is _Ophiothrix fragilis_ (Figs. 207, 208), which is found in swarms in shallow water off the west coast of England and Scotland. We may therefore select it as the type, and, since the ARM is the most characteristic organ of an Ophiuroid, we may commence by studying it. Speaking generally, an Ophiuroid either drags itself forward by two arms and pushes itself by the other three (Fig. 207),[458] or else it drags itself by one and pushes with the other four (Fig. 217). The arms during this process are bent into characteristic curves, by the straightening of which in the posterior arms the animal is pushed onwards, whilst the intensification of these curves in the anterior arms causes the animal to be dragged forwards. The grip of the arm on the substratum is chiefly in the distal portion of the curve. The alteration of the curvature is due to the contraction of the muscles on one side of the arms. There is no ambulacral groove such as is found on the under side of the arms of all Asteroidea, for the arm is completely ensheathed by four series of plates, an upper row of dorsal plates, an under row of ventral plates, and two lateral rows of lateral plates. The last named, which in all probability correspond to the adambulacral plates of Starfish, bear each a transverse row of seven spines with roughened surfaces; these enable the animal to get a grip on the substratum over which it moves. The podia in Ophiuroidea are termed "tentacles"; they are totally devoid of suckers, being simple conical papillae used as sense-organs, and are of little, if any, service in locomotion. They issue from openings called "tentacle-pores" situated between the edges of the {480}ventral and lateral plates, guarded each by a valve-like plate called the "tentacle-scale." In _Ophiothrix_ they are covered with sense-organs, each consisting of a hillock-like elevation of the ectoderm, in which are cells carrying long stiff sense-hairs. In most Ophiuroids such organs are not present, though abundant scattered sense-cells occur, and the outer surface of the tube-feet and the lining of certain pockets called "genital bursae" (Fig. 208, _g.b_) are the only portions of the surface where the ectoderm persists. Everywhere else, although present in the young, it disappears, leaving as remnants a few nuclei here and there attached to the under side of the cuticle.[459]
The greater part of the section of the arm is occupied by a disc-like ossicle called the "vertebra." Each vertebra articulates with its predecessor and successor by cup-and-ball joints, and it is connected to each of them by four powerful longitudinal muscles. Above, its outline is notched by a groove, in which lies an extension of the coelom of the disc (Fig. 209, _coe_), but contains no outgrowth of the alimentary canal, as is the case in Asteroidea. The vertebra is also grooved below, and in this lower groove are contained the radial water-vascular canal {481}(Fig. 209, _w.v.r_), and below it perihaemal canals as in Asteroidea; below this again the radial nerve-cord (_L_), and beneath this again a canal called the "epineural canal" (_ep_), which represents the missing ambulacral groove. This canal in the very young Brittle Star is an open groove, but becomes closed by the approximation of its edges. The vertebra, which has a double origin, represents a pair of fused ambulacral ossicles. In _Ophiohelus_ these are only slightly adherent to one another (Fig. 216).
When the surface of a vertebra is examined it is found that it can be divided into a thin border, to which are attached the four muscles by which it is connected to its successor and predecessor, and a central portion, on which are situated the knobs and pits, by means of which it articulates with the next vertebra.
The simultaneous contraction of the two upper muscles causes the arm to bend upwards. The contraction of the two lower bend it downwards, whilst a sideward movement is effected by the contraction of the upper and lower muscle of the same side. On the proximal surface of the central portion of the vertebra there is a central knob and two ventro-lateral knobs, {482}a median ventral pit and two dorso-lateral pits, and on the distal surface there are pits corresponding to the knobs on the proximal side and _vice versa_ (Fig. 210, C). These knobs and pits restrict the movement of one vertebra on the next, so that although the arms can undergo an unlimited amount of flexion from side to side, they cannot be rolled up in the vertical plane. When the under surface of the vertebra is examined there is seen on each side of the central groove two round holes, a distal and a proximal. The distal pair are for the passage of the canals connecting the radial water-vessel with the tentacles, these canals traversing the substance of the vertebra for a part of their course; the proximal pair are for nerves going to the longitudinal muscles, which likewise perforate part of the ventral border of the vertebra.
In order to understand the anomalous circumstance that the canals going to the tentacles actually perforate the vertebrae, it must be clearly borne in mind that the basis of the body-wall in all Echinoderms is a mass of jelly with amoebocytes in it, to which we must assign the power of secreting carbonate of lime, and all we have to assume in the case of Ophiuroids is that calcification spread outwards from the original ambulacral ossicles into the surrounding jelly, enclosing any organs that happened to traverse it.
When the ossicles of the arm are followed inwards towards the MOUTH, they are seen to undergo a profound modification, so as to form, by union with the corresponding ossicles of adjacent arms, a structure called the mouth-frame. The general character of this modification is similar to that affecting the first ambulacral and adambulacral ossicles in the arms of an Asteroid, but in the Ophiuroid the change is much more profound. The first apparent vertebra consists of two separated halves, and each is fused with the first adambulacral (lateral) plate, which in turn is firmly united with the corresponding plate in the adjoining arm. Thus is formed the "jaw," as the projection is called. The extensions of the mouth-cavity between adjacent jaws are termed "mouth-angles." To the apex of each jaw is attached a plate bearing a vertical row of seven short blunt spines called "teeth" (Fig. 212, _p_). The plate is called the "torus angularis" (Fig. 211, _T_), and on its ventral edge there is a tuft of spines which are termed "tooth-papillae" (Fig. 208, _t.p_). On the upper aspect of the jaw {483}are a pair of plates termed "peristomial plates." These discs—of which there are two in each radius, one on each jaw which flanks the radius—possibly represent the separated halves of the first vertebra, the apparent first vertebra being really the second. On the flank of the jaw there is dorsally a groove for the water-vascular ring and nerve-ring (Fig. 212, _n.r_), and beneath this a groove for the first tentacle and a pore for the second, both of which spring directly from the ring-canal; below these, in most Ophiuroidea, but not in _Ophiothrix_, there is a row of blunt triangular spines called "mouth-papillae" (Fig. 212, _p^1_).
The words "jaw" and "tooth" are misleading. There is no evidence that the jaws of a Brittle Star are ever used for crushing food, but by means of the muscles attaching them to the first {484}complete vertebra in the arm they can be rotated downwards so as greatly to enlarge the mouth, and again rotated upwards and inwards, when they form an excellent strainer to prevent the entrance of coarse particles. To permit this extensive movement the articulatory facets on the proximal surface of the first vertebra have been much modified; the median knob and pit have disappeared, and the dorso-lateral pits are raised on to the surface of processes, so that there are in all four processes, two of which articulate with one half of a jaw.
The mouth can be narrowed and the jaws forced inwards towards the centre by the simultaneous contraction of five muscles (_musc. tr_, Fig. 213) each, which unite the two halves of a jaw.
Turning now to the skeleton of the DISC, we notice that dorsally it consists of a closely-fitting mosaic of small plates, which are usually concealed from view by a covering of minute spines. Opposite the insertion of each arm there are, however, a pair of large triangular plates ("radials"), which extend outwards to the periphery and strengthen it, much as the ribs do in an umbrella. These radial plates are always exposed, in _Ophiothrix_, even when the rest of the dorsal plates are concealed by spines. On the under surface there is a similar plating; but adjoining the jaws are five large, more or less rhomboidal, plates {485}termed "scuta buccalia" (Fig. 211, _J_{1}_), on one of which open the few madreporic pores which the animal possesses. Attached to the sides of the scuta buccalia are the "lateral mouth shields," which are in fact the adambulacral plates belonging to the second pair of ambulacral plates which form the main mass of the jaws. Further out, on the under side of the disc, there is, on each side of each arm, a long narrow slit—the opening of the genital bursa (Fig. 208, _g.b_), so that there are ten genital bursae. The "genital bursa" (Fig. 214) is a sac lined by ciliated ectoderm projecting into the interior of the disc. It is called genital because the openings of the genital organs are situated on its surface; its main function, however, is respiratory, the cilia bringing about a constant inward current of fresh sea-water, the oxygen contained in which diffuses through the thin wall of the sac into the coelomic fluid. The opening of the bursa is strengthened on its radial side by a rod-like ossicle, the "genital plate," and on its interradial side by an ossicle called the "genital scale" (Fig. 212, _gen_), and in _Ophiothrix_ the outer end of the radial plate articulates with the outer end of the genital plate. Muscles connect the two plates running on either side of the articulation.
Observations on _Ophiothrix_[460] show that in this species at any rate the radial plates can be raised or lowered. When they are raised the centre of the disc is lifted into a cone and water is sucked into the genital bursae, whereas when they are lowered the bursae are compressed and water is expelled. This forced respiration appears to come into play when the supply of oxygen is getting scanty.
The ALIMENTARY CANAL of _Ophiothrix_ is a simple flattened sac (Fig. 213). It is devoid of an anus and cannot be everted through the mouth. There is a horizontal pouch given off into each interradial lobe of the disc. The sac is attached to the dorsal wall of the coelom by numerous mesenteries, fibrous cords traversing the coelomic cavity and clothed on the outer side by coelomic epithelium. To the mouth-frame it is attached by a circular membrane, which we have reason for believing is a {486}functionless remnant of the retractor muscles of the stomach of Asteroidea. In the young Asteroid there is a similar sheet of membrane, which later becomes resolved into the ten retractor bands.
The simple structure of the alimentary canal appears to be correlated with the exceedingly simple character of the food. _Ophiothrix_ feeds on the most superficial layer of mud at the bottom of the sea. This deposit consists partly of microscopic Algae and partly of decaying organic matter, and is much more easily disposed of than the living animals on which the Starfish preys. The food is shovelled into the mouth by the first two or "buccal" pairs of tube-feet in each ray.
The WATER-VASCULAR SYSTEM has undergone a most interesting set of modifications, which can be explained by noticing the fact that the tube-feet have almost, if not quite, lost their locomotor function and are now used as tactile organs. The ampulla, or swollen inner end of the tube-foot, has disappeared, and the upper end of the organ is directly connected with the radial canal by means of a curved canal, which traverses the outermost flange of the vertebra, appearing on its {487}surface in a groove on the outer side of the dorsal lateral knob on the distal side of the ossicle. As in Asteroidea there are valves, which regulate the entrance of fluid into the tube-foot. The stone-canal is a curved tube of simple circular section and excessively narrow bore which extends from the water-vascular ring _downwards_ to the madreporite (Fig. 213, _mp_) situated on one of the scuta buccalia. The madreporite, in _Ophiothrix_ as in most Brittle Stars, is an exceedingly rudimentary structure, consisting of one or two pores leading into as many pore-canals. From each interradius, except that in which the stone-canal lies, a large Polian vesicle hangs down from the water-vascular ring into the coelom.
We saw that in the Asteroid the ampulla was used like the bulb of a pipette to force the fluid in the tube-foot down into the tip, so as to press the sucker against the substratum. But when the tube-foot is used as a sense-organ, a few circular fibres around its upper end suffice to bring about all the extension that is needed. Since the extension is no longer a very vigorous act, the loss of fluid by transudation has probably been rendered insignificant, and hence the stone-canal and madreporite, whose function it is to repair the loss, have been reduced in size. The curious ventral curvature of the stone-canal is, however, due to another cause. In the very young Ophiuroid the madreporite is on the edge of the disc, and the stone-canal extends horizontally outwards; and in some Asteroidea there is a similar outward direction in its course. As development proceeds the dorsal interradial areas of the disc of the young Ophiuroid grow out into lobes, building up the conspicuous adult disc and forcing the madreporite, and with it the stone-canal, downwards towards the ventral surface.
The pores of the madreporite in _Ophiothrix_, like some of those in the Asteroid, open not directly into the stone-canal but into the AXIAL SINUS (Fig. 213, _ax_). This is a large ovoid sac, lined with thin epithelium, lying between the stone-canal and the mouth-frame, since of course it has shared in the ventral rotation of the stone-canal. Its open connexion with the stone-canal was easily recognised by Ludwig, who termed it, on this account, the "ampulla."[461] The name "axial sinus" was bestowed {488}mistakenly on another cavity, which will be mentioned in connexion with the genital organs.
The radial PERIHAEMAL SPACES of the arms open into a "perihaemal ring" representing the outer perihaemal ring of Asteroids; but the axial sinus does not have any such extension as constitutes the inner perihaemal ring in Starfish. So-called oral circular and radial BLOOD STRANDS are to be found in similar positions to the corresponding structures in _Asteroidea_.
The NERVOUS SYSTEM might have been expected to have become very much modified, since the activities of the Brittle Stars are so different from those of the Starfish. It is indeed a universal rule in the Animal Kingdom that, concomitantly with the increase in size and activity of a muscle, there is a corresponding increase in the number of ganglion-cells which control it. An accurate radial section of an arm shows that there is, corresponding to the interspaces between the two vertebrae, a ganglionic swelling of the nerve-cord. As in Asteroids, there are not only ectodermic ganglion-cells on the under surface of the cord abutting on the epineural canal, but also coelomic ganglion-cells derived from the floor of the radial perihaemal canal. Both these categories of cells are largely increased in number in the ganglion. From the dorsal-cells arise a pair of large nerves which pass directly up and supply the great intervertebral muscles. From the interspace between the ganglia a direct prolongation of the ventral part of the nerve-cord, the so-called pedal nerve, extends out along the side of the tentacle, as in Asteroids. In Ophiuroids it swells out into a ganglion, completely surrounding the tentacle and giving off nerves to the surfaces of the arm which terminate in the cuticle.
There is a large ganglion where the radial cord joins the nerve-ring, and, owing to the more specialised condition of the nervous system, a severed arm in an Ophiuroid is much more helpless than an arm of an Asteroid. It will not carry out "escape movements," and is for a long time rigid under the shock of section; at last it simply gives reflex movements on stimulation.
Comments
Log in to leave a comment.
The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 01 (of 10)Chapter XIX: Appendix: To Ctenophora (2)
0%37 min left in chapter