Skip to content

Chapter I: The Discipline1685 of Pure Reason

Text size

Kant is neither an intellectualist nor an anti-intellectualist. Reason, the proper duty of which is to prescribe a discipline to all other endeavours, itself requires discipline; and when it is employed in the metaphysical sphere, independently of experience, it demands not merely the correction of single errors, but the eradication of their causes through “a separate negative code,” such as a Critical philosophy can alone supply. In the _Transcendental Doctrine of Elements_ this demand has been met as regards the _materials_ or _contents_ of the Critical system; we are now concerned only with its _methods_ or _formal conditions_.[1686]

This distinction is highly artificial. As already indicated, it is determined by the requirements of Kant’s architectonic. The entire teaching of the _Methodology_ has already been more or less exhaustively expounded in the earlier divisions of the _Critique_.

Comments

Log in to leave a comment.

A Commentary to Kant's 'Critique of Pure Reason'Chapter I: The Discipline1685 of Pure Reason

0%1 min left in chapter