Chapter XIV: Front Matter (14)

BILL OF FARE FOR DIABETES.--Breakfast.--Oysters stewed, without flour; clams stewed, without flour. Beefsteak, beefsteak with fried onions, broiled chicken, mutton or lamb chops; kidneys, broiled, stewed, or devilled; tripe, pigs' feet, game, ham, bacon, devilled turkey or chicken, sausage, corned-beef hash without potato, minced beef, turkey, chicken, or game with poached eggs. All kinds of fish, fish-roe, fish-balls, without potato. Eggs cooked in any way except with flour or sugar, scrambled eggs with chipped smoked beef, picked salt codfish with eggs, omelets plain or with ham, with smoked beef, kidneys, asparagus-points, fine herbs, parsley, truffles, or mushrooms. Radishes, cucumbers, water-cresses, butter, pot-cheese. Tea or coffee, with a little cream and no sugar. (Glycerin may be used instead of sugar if desired.) Light red wine for those who are in the habit of taking wine at breakfast.

Lunch or Tea.--Oysters or clams cooked in any way except with flour; chicken, lobster, or any kind of salad except potato; fish of all kinds; chops, steaks, ham, tongue, eggs, crabs, or any kind of meat; head-cheese. Red wine, dry sherry, or Bass's ale.

{222} Dinner.--Raw oysters, raw clams.

Soups.--Consommé of beef, of veal, of chicken, or of turtle; consommé with asparagus-points; consommé with okra, ox-tail, turtle, terrapin, oyster, or clam, without flour; chowder, without potatoes, mock turtle, mullagatawny, tomato, gumbo filet.

Fish, etc.--All kinds of fish, lobsters, oysters, clams, terrapin, shrimps, crawfish, hard-shell crabs, soft-shell crabs, (No sauces containing flour.)

Relishes.--Pickles, radishes, celery, sardines, anchovies, olives.

Meats.--All kinds of meat cooked in any way except with flour; all kinds of poultry without dressings containing bread or flour; calf's head, kidneys, sweetbreads, lamb-fries, ham, tongue; all kinds of game; veal, fowl, sweetbreads, etc., with curry, but not thickened with flour. (No liver.)

Vegetables.--Truffles, lettuce, romaine, chicory, endive, cucumbers, spinach, sorrel, beet-tops, cauliflower, cabbage, brussels-sprouts, dandelions, tomatoes, radishes, oyster-plant, celery, onions, string-beans, water-cresses, asparagus, artichoke, Jerusalem artichokes, parsley, mushrooms, all kinds of herbs.

Substitutes for Sweets.--Peaches preserved in brandy without sugar; wine-jelly without sugar, gelée au kirsch without sugar, omelette au rhum without sugar; omelette à la vanille without sugar; gelée au rhum without sugar; gelée au café without sugar.

Miscellaneous.--Butter, cheese of all kinds, eggs cooked in all ways except with flour or sugar, sauces without sugar or flour. Almonds, hazel-nuts, walnuts, cocoanuts. Tea or coffee with a little cream and without sugar. (Glycerin may be used instead of sugar if desired.) Moderately palatable ice-creams and wine-jellies may be made, sweetened with pure glycerin; but although these may be quite satisfactory for a time, they soon become distasteful.

Alcoholic Beverages.--Claret, burgundy, dry sherry, Bass's ale or bitter beer. (No sweet wines.)

Prohibited.--Ordinary bread; cake, etc. made with flour or sugar; desserts made with flour or sugar; vegetables, except those mentioned above; sweet fruits.

[Footnote 49: "On the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus," a paper read before the American Medical Association at its meeting in Washington, May, 1884, and published in the _Journal_ of the association July 12, 1884. I have so far modified the bill of fare as to permit the use of milk, which Flint excludes.]

One of the foods the omission of which is most illy borne by the diabetic, however great his previous indifference to it, is wheaten bread, while the substitutes which have been at different times suggested for it very imperfectly supply its place. Perhaps the best known of these is the bread made of gluten flour. It was suggested by Bouchardat in 1841, and is made by washing the ordinary wheat flour to free it from starch.[50]

[Footnote 50: The Health Food Company, of 74 Fourth Avenue, N.Y., prepare a gluten flour by first removing the five bran-coats, pulverizing the cleaned berry by the cold-blast process, stirring the powder into iced water, and precipitating the gluten, cellulose, and mineral matters, siphoning off the water holding in suspension the starch, and drying out the precipitate. In this manner the salts of the wheat are retained. A purified gluten made by the Health Food Company is deprived of the cellulose walls of the cells in which the gluten granules are held. Directions for making gluten bread and cakes of various kinds are furnished by the company on application.]

Gluten flour, however prepared, contains some starch, as indeed it must if bread is to be made out of it; and I confess to having been a good deal disappointed in its use. I have known the sugar absent in a {223} selected diet to return when gluten bread was permitted, and again disappear on its withdrawal. Of course gluten flour contains less starch than the ordinary wheat flour, and there may be cases where the starch in the former can be assimilated when the quantity in the latter cannot be. The gluten may be made into porridge.[51]

[Footnote 51: Gluten porridge is made by stirring the gluten into boiling water until thick enough, and then keeping up the boiling process for fifteen minutes. A little salt and butter are added at the close to improve the flavor, and it may be eaten with milk or cream.]

A method of getting rid of the starch and sugar in bread, suggested by Liebig and tried by Vogel, consists in converting the starch into sugar by the action of diastase and dissolving out the sugar thus produced. This is accomplished by treating thin slices of bread with an infusion of malt. The bread is then washed, dried, and slightly toasted.

Another substitute for wheaten flour is the bran flour whence the starch is removed by washing.[52] The bran itself, according to Parkes,[53] sometimes contains as much as 15 per cent. of nitrogenous matter, 3.5 per cent. of fats, and 5.7 per cent. of salts. It is therefore not wholly innutritious, although the salts are washed out in removing the starch. It is considered especially useful when there is constipation, the slightly irritant properties of the bran aiding in maintaining a proper peristalsis and action of the bowels. These irritant properties are, however, inversely as the degree of comminution. The bran flour may be made with milk and eggs into a variety of cakes, of which the best known are those made according to Camplin's directions.[54]

[Footnote 52: A very carefully prepared bran flour, as well as a wheat-gluten flour, is prepared by John W. Sheddon, pharmacist, corner of Broadway and Thirty-fourth street, New York City.]

[Footnote 53: _Practical Hygiene_, 5th ed., Philadelphia, 1878, p. 222.]

[Footnote 54: The following are Camplin's directions for making biscuit of bran flour: To one quarter of a pound of flour add three or four fresh eggs, one and a half ounces of butter, and half a pint of milk; mix the eggs with a little of the milk, and warm the butter with the other portion; then stir the whole together well; add a little nutmeg or ginger or other agreeable flavoring, and bake in small forms or patterns. The cake, when baked, should be about the thickness of an ordinary captain's biscuit. The pans must be well buttered. Bake in rather a quick oven for half an hour. These cakes or biscuits may be eaten by the diabetic with meat or cheese for breakfast, dinner, or supper; at tea they require rather a free allowance of butter, or they may be eaten with curd or any soft cheese.]

Where extreme restriction of diet is not required the ordinary bran bread of the bakers may be used. The unbolted flour of which this is made of course contains the starchy principles, but in consequence of the retention of the bran the proportion of starch is less. The cold-blast flour of the Health Food Company is said to contain the nutritious, but not the innutritious, parts of the bran.[55]

[Footnote 55: It is made by pulverizing the carefully cleaned wheat by a compressed, cold air blast, which strikes the wheat and dashes it to atoms.]

The almond food suggested by Pavy is another substitute for bread. The almond is composed of 54 per cent. of oil, 24 per cent. of nitrogenized matter known as emulsin, 6 per cent. of sugar, and 3 per cent. of gum, but no starch enters into its composition. Theoretically, therefore, the food should be everything that can be desired if the gum and sugar can be removed. The latter is done by treating the powdered almonds with boiling water slightly acidulated with tartaric acid, or soaking the almonds in a boiling acidulated liquid which may form a part of the process for blanching. The boiling and acid are necessary to precipitate {224} the emulsin, which would otherwise emulsify the oil of the almond. Pavy speaks well of biscuit made of almond flour and eggs, which he says go very well with a little sherry or other wine, although he admits they are found too rich by some for ordinary consumption. One person only under my observation has used the almond food, and found it unpalatable.

Seegen recommends an almond food made as follows: Beat a quarter of a pound of blanched sweet almonds in a stone mortar for about three-quarters of an hour, making the flour as fine as possible; put the flour thus obtained into a linen bag, which is then immersed for an hour and a quarter in boiling water acidulated with a few drops of vinegar. The mass is thoroughly mixed with three ounces of butter and two eggs; the yolks of three eggs and a little salt are added, and the whole is to be stirred briskly for a long time. A fine froth made by beating the white of the three eggs is added. The whole paste is now put into a form smeared with melted butter and baked by a gentle fire.

Biscuits made of inulin, the starchy principle largely contained in Iceland moss, were suggested by Kuelz. Although a starch, it is one of the assimilable ones alluded to, of which small quantities at least may be taken as food without appearing in the urine as sugar. The biscuits are made with the addition of milk, eggs, and salt, and are inexpensive.

To some persons sugar is almost as imperative a necessity as bread, although to many it is not a very great sacrifice to omit it from ordinary cooking, if not from tea and coffee. For the latter it is just as well to dispense with sugar altogether. But where patients feel that they must have some substitute for sugar, glycerin has been suggested for this purpose, at least for sweetening tea and coffee. But Pavy has noted[56] that under the use of glycerin the urine increased from three and three and three-fourth pints to between five and six pints, and the sugar from 1100 grains to 3000 grains per diem, in the course of three days. Its withdrawal was followed by a prompt fall in both the urine and sugar, a return to it by a second increase, and subsequent withdrawal by another decline. Along with the increase of urine and sugar came also more thirst and discomfort. An examination of the chemical composition of glycerin would seem to confirm these results of experience. Glycerin is represented by C_{3}H_{8}O_{3}, sugar by C_{6}H_{12}O_{3}, and glycogen by C_{6}H_{10}O_{5}; whence it is evident that a conversion of glycerin into sugar may take place in the liver. These facts seem to show conclusively that glycerin is no suitable substitute for sugar. I therefore do not use it.

[Footnote 56: _On Diabetes_, London, 1869, p. 259.]

From what has been said it may be inferred that sugar of milk, mannite, and lævulose, or fruit-sugar, are admissible where sugar is demanded. They may be tried, but the urine should be carefully examined under their use, and if glycosuria occur or be increased they should be promptly omitted.

Almost every purpose of sugar in the cooking of acid vegetables is served by bicarbonate of sodium or potassium. As much bicarbonate of potassium to the pound as will lie upon a quarter of a dollar will neutralize the acidity of most fruits which require a large amount of sugar to mask this property. In this manner cranberries, plums, cherries, gooseberries, red currants, strawberries, apples, peaches, and indeed {225} all fruits to which sugar is usually added in the cooking, become available to the diabetic.

In the matter of drinks, where the patient is not on a skim-milk diet, which usually affords as much liquid as is required by the economy, little restraint need be placed upon the consumption of water, which is demanded to replace that secreted with the sugar. Instead of water, Apollinaris water, Vichy, or the ordinary carbonated water may be used if preferred, and to many they are much more refreshing by reason of the carbonic acid they hold in suspension. Apollinaris water is particularly so, and one of my patients, who recovered completely under a suitable selected diet with which this mineral water was permitted, insists that it was that which cured her.

Where a simple selected diet is adopted, tea and coffee without sugar are usually permitted. The propriety of the substitutes for sugar already referred to must be determined by circumstances.

Of distilled and fermented liquors, moderate quantities of whiskey and brandy, dry sherry and madeira, the acid German and French wines--in fact, any non-saccharine wines--may be permitted. A medical friend who reports himself about cured of diabetes writes me that he has consumed eighty gallons of Rhine wine since he began to adhere closely to a diabetic diet. On the other hand, the free use of the stronger alcoholic drinks has been charged with causing diabetes, and I have known such use to produce a recurrence of sugar. No malt liquors, except those in which the sugar has been completely converted into carbonic acid and alcohol, should be used. Bass's ale may be allowed where no especial stringency is required.

HYGIENIC TREATMENT.--The patient should be surrounded by the most favorable hygienic influences. He should sleep in well-ventilated rooms; pass much time in the open air; bathe regularly, but not in water that is very cold, and especially the body should not be long submerged in cold water, as the liver must share the general internal hyperæmia incident to prolonged cooling of the skin, and increased glycosuria may result. I have known sugar to reappear after a prolonged drenching of the skin of patients overtaken by a rainstorm. Perhaps the most suitable time for the hot or tepid bath is on retiring in winter, but in summer it may be taken on rising. Thorough friction of the entire body should be practised after the bath or independently of it. An ounce or two of sodium carbonate may be added to it with advantage, as it softens the skin and facilitates the removal of the effete epithelium. The bowels should be kept regularly open, as the effect of their confinement is to produce torpor and congestion of the liver.

Certain natural mineral waters have always enjoyed a reputation for the cure of diabetes, and notably those of Vichy and Carlsbad. The former is an alkaline water with a slight laxative tendency, and the latter a decided aperient alkaline-saline water; and it is not unlikely that they owe a part of their good effects to an action upon the liver and upper bowel. This seems the more likely because Carlsbad, which enjoys the highest reputation, contains a far larger proportion of chlorides and sulphates, which are purgative. Vichy water contains 35 grains of carbonates to the pint, and Carlsbad 11, but the latter contains twice the proportion of chlorides, or 8 grains to the pint, and ten times as much sodium {226} sulphate, or 19 grains to the pint. They may be used as adjuvants to the treatment, a pint of Vichy or half as much Carlsbad in the morning. Being imported waters, they are comparatively expensive, and I know of no American waters which closely approach them in composition.

Of American waters, the Saratoga Vichy contains twice as much chlorides as the Carlsbad, 17.7 grains to the pint, but no sulphates. It contains about the same amount of carbonates as Vichy. It is therefore a saline-alkaline water, and may be expected to serve the purposes of Vichy and some of those of Carlsbad, for which it may be substituted. Most of the American mineral waters vaunted as useful in diabetes will be found, on comparison with these waters, to be chemically indifferent, and therefore about as useful as so much ordinary spring-water. Of the Crab Orchard Springs in Kentucky, the Sowder's spring contains 25 grains of sulphate of sodium and magnesium and 7 grains of sodium chloride to the pint, therefore about the same proportion of the two substances combined as Carlsbad; yet I am not aware that these waters have any reputation in diabetes. The waters of Bedford Springs, Pennsylvania, also approximate them in the proportion of sulphates of sodium and magnesium.

Other Saratoga waters have an undoubted action on the liver through their chlorides, and may be used in lieu of the European waters above referred to, and of the Saratoga Vichy, when these cannot be obtained; such are the Geyser spring, which contains 70 grains of chlorides to the pint, and the Hathorn, containing 63 grains.

MEDICINAL TREATMENT.--While the dietetic treatment, and especially the skim-milk treatment, of diabetes mellitus is much to be preferred for its results over an exclusively medicinal treatment, and is of itself sufficient to control, if not to cure, a large number of cases, yet instances arise in which it is insufficient to complete the removal of sugar from the urine, and there are others in which it is impossible for various causes to carry out such treatment.

In my book on _Bright's Disease and Diabetes_, published three years ago, I gave the preference of drugs to ergot; but since then extended opportunities have convinced me that codeia is a far more efficient remedy. Repeated comparative trials of this drug in the wards of the Philadelphia Hospital and elsewhere have satisfied me of this. The trials have been made while the patients were upon a mixed diet, which I hold to be the only fair way of arriving at a knowledge of the true value of a drug in the disease. Codeia was first suggested by Pavy in lieu of opium and morphia, which had long been used, his reason being that it did not produce the same narcotic effect. Favorable reports upon its use have been made by Foster, Image, Brunton, R. Shingleton Smith, Cavafy, Austin Flint, Sr., Harvey L. Byrd, and others. It may be given in pill or solution. One should begin with ¼ of a grain three times a day, increasing ¼ of a grain daily until the sugar disappears or the remedy ceases to have any effect, or until drowsiness is produced. Thus gradually increasing, I have reached as high as 47 grains in a day. Cavafy has given 15 grains three times daily.

Opium--which is said to have been used by Aetius for this disease--or morphia might be used if codeia cannot be obtained, but they are less efficient, more dangerous, and more apt to produce the troublesome {227} symptom of constipation. MacGregor[57] gave in one case 60 grains of opium, and in another 90 grains, in the twenty-four hours.

[Footnote 57: _London Medical Gazette_, 1837.]

While I have seen the most striking results upon the quantity both of sugar and urine during the administration of codeia, and at the same time have noted a gain in flesh and strength, I cannot say that I have ever seen a case totally recover under its use. Such cases are, however, reported by others. I have always used it in the very worst cases, where dietetic measures had also failed to remove the sugar. As to the mode of action of codeine, we can only speculate. It may be said that it quiets the irritation of the vaso-motor centre, whence result the glycosuria and other symptoms of diabetes.

Next to codeine in efficiency, of drugs, is ergot. The favorable results of its use are more easily explained by its physiological action--contraction upon the muscular walls of blood-vessels--than those of codeine, but it is not so efficient a remedy. It may be used by beginning with half a drachm, and increasing to a drachm, four times a day. Larger doses than this, as much as half an ounce four times a day, have been given, but the stomach rarely permits their continuation for any length of time.

Bromide of potassium, an old remedy for diabetes, has recently been revived and much lauded by the French physicians, but I have never found any results from its use. I can understand, however, how in certain cases of nervous origin it may be useful.

Comparatively recently, Clemens of Frankfort-on-the-Main has recommended the use of what he terms brom-arsen or bromide of arsenic. The dose is one-forty-eighth of a grain three times a day, gradually increased by this same amount until one-sixth or one-fifth of a grain is given daily.[58] Clemens, however, unites with its use a dietetic treatment. I have used it in connection with an unselected diet, and have not found the results claimed by Clemens. It is, however, both tonic and sedative, and as such is to be recommended in conjunction with other measures.

[Footnote 58: The late Mr. R. F. Fairthorne, with Mr. James T. Shinn, apothecary, cor. Broad and Spruce streets, Philadelphia, prepared for me a solution of bromide of arsenic in the following manner: 77 grains of metallic arsenic in powder are added in small portions to 240 grains of bromine, the latter being placed in a long test-tube immersed in ice-water to control the otherwise violent reaction. One hundred grains of the tribromide thus obtained are dissolved in sufficient distilled water to make ten fluidounces. One minim will then contain one-forty-eighth of a grain.]

Arsenic itself has some reputation in the treatment of diabetes, based upon the observation of Salkowsky that glycogen diminishes in the livers of animals poisoned with arsenic. It is at least a good adjuvant tonic. Leube gave it in diabetes in doses of one-third of a grain three times a day.

Strychnia is also very useful as a tonic, and may be used either alone or in the shape of the sulphate, or combined with arsenic and iron, or it may be given, perhaps preferably, in solution in combination with an acid. Given in combination with phosphoric acid, I believe it the most valuable tonic available in this disease.

To supply the phosphates, in which gluten bread is deficient, as well as for their tonic effect, the various preparations of phosphates are useful. {228} The well-known compound syrup of the phosphates, or Parrish's chemical food, may be considered a type of these preparations. Every fluidrachm, which is a dose, contains 2½ grains of calcium phosphate, 1 grain of ferric phosphate, with fractions of a grain of sodium and potassium phosphate with free phosphoric acid. Similar is the solution of phosphates and phosphoric acid[59] known in this country as solution of phosphoric acid with iron, or the latter may be omitted.

[Footnote 59: Rx. Calcii phosphat. gr. iij;
Magnesii " gr. ss;
Potassii " gr. iv;
Ferri " gr. ss;
Ac. phosphoric minim vj;
Aquæ q. s. ad. fluidrachm i, which is a dose.]

Iodide of potassium has been used in some cases with satisfactory results, and may be expected to be useful where syphilitic disease of the nervous system is suspected.

Seegen has seen sugar disappear from the urine under a dosage of 20 to 30 drops of tincture of iodine daily, but the sugar reappeared after the remedy was discontinued.

Lactic acid was recommended by Cantani on theoretical grounds as a substitute for sugar. He supposes that in health the sugar ingested is converted by the liver into lactic acid, and he would furnish the latter already formed, and thus spare the liver this function. Senator also favors the use of this acid for a similar purpose, but reasons that in health sugar is converted into lactic acid in the small intestine, while in diabetes this conversion is interfered with. Hence, too, it should be given fully formed. Patients under its use are said to gain in weight and to become stronger, while it is not claimed that it alone diminishes the glycosuria; this must be brought about by a selected diet. The lactic acid is simply an important force-producer not otherwise obtainable, because sugar fails to undergo its usual conversion. Cantani recommends that from 75 to 150 grains of the acid should be taken daily in from 8 to 10 fluidounces of water. Diarrhoea and pains in the joints are said to follow the use of large quantities of the drug, but these again disappear on its omission. My experience is limited to a single case, which recovered while taking 30 drops three times a day in conjunction with Carlsbad water and a pill of iron, quinia, and arsenic.

Senator suggested that the fatty acids--oleic, palmitic, stearic, and butyric--be used on the same principle that lactic acid is given, that their force-producing power may be availed of. To this end he prescribed, with partially satisfactory results, soap in pills containing 2-1/3 grains each, of which four were taken daily.

Cod-liver oil is especially suitable as a food where debility is to be combated. Even those who claim that fats are convertible into sugar in the liver admit that it is only in the most advanced stages of diabetes that such conversion takes place. Cod-liver oil, therefore, in common with other fats, may form part of a diabetic diet, and is especially indicated where phthisis is present, as it so often is, in the latter stages of the disease, or indeed whenever a good tonic is indicated.

In 1882, Moleschott[60] suggested the use of iodoform in diabetes. He reported the effect of its use in five cases, giving .1 to .3 grm. (1.5 to {229} 4.5 grs.) in pill with extract of lactucarium and cumarin, the purpose of the latter being to disguise the odor. His formula was as follows: Iodoform, 1 gram (15 grs.); ext. lactuc. sat., .1 gram (15 grs.); cumarin, .1 gram (1.5 grs.), to be made into twenty pills. In one case the sugar disappeared in twelve days; in the second, at the end of six months; in the third case it had diminished from 14.4 to 1.6 grams in three months; in the fourth, from 28 grams to 1.6 in four months; and in the fifth case, from 9.2 to 6.1 grams.

[Footnote 60: _Wiener Med. Wochenschr._, Nos. 17, 18, 19.]

The use of the remedy in Moleschott's hands produced no unpleasant results, but Drasch,[61] who used the same treatment after Moleschott's method in three cases, with the effect of diminishing the thirst, the quantity of urine, and the proportion of sugar, found excessive itching of the skin, diminished appetite, and diarrhoea to result in such degree as to demand its disuse in the majority of cases. Iodoform has been used by the Italian physicians De Renzi,[62] Bozzolo,[63] and Silvestrini,[64] and by Sara E. Post[65] of New York, with varying but generally favorable results, except in Silvestrini's case. These results included diminution in thirst, quantity of sugar and urea, with increase in weight. The drug deserves a trial in doses of from 1 to 2 grams (15 to 30 grains) a day, but due regard should be had to possible toxic effects; and to this end the administration should be interrupted at the end of one or two weeks, and the interruption continued for a like period. It may be given in pill or in capsule, and in divided doses or in a single dose at bedtime. The latter course is recommended by Post, and is said to avoid eructations and anorexia. Theories of its action based upon experimental use of poisonous doses ascribe its effect to a primary stimulating and ultimately fatally degenerative effect upon the protoplasm of cells, and especially those of the liver and nervous system.

[Footnote 61: _Wiener Med. Presse_, 1882, xxiii. 1487.]

[Footnote 62: "Tre Storie di Diabete." _Gior. internaz. d. sc. med._, Nap., 1882, N. S. iv. 913-917.]

[Footnote 63: "Sur l'action du iodoforme dans la diabète sucre," _Arch. ital. de biol._, Turin, Feb., 1883, iii. 317-321.]

[Footnote 64: "Iodoforme dans le diabète," _La France Méd._, October, 1883, ii. 567.]

[Footnote 65: _Archives of Medicine_, April, 1884, p. 116.]

Transfusion of blood has been recommended by Dieulafoy,[66] and is approved of by Ralfe,[67] especially to combat the symptoms of acetonæmia, which, if due to a toxic agent, as seems most likely, should be met by altering the percentage composition of the blood with relation to the toxic agent.

[Footnote 66: "Étude sur la Transfusion du Sang dans le diabète sucre," _Bullétin et Mém. Soc. Méd. de Hôp. de Paris_, 1884, 4, S. 1, 38, 41.]

[Footnote 67: "Discussion before the Path. Soc. of London," _Lancet_, Apr. 7, 1883, p. 592.]

Diabetic neuralgia yields generally to the treatment of the disease in general correspondingly to the reduction in the quantity of sugar, and at times to salicylate of sodium, while it does not respond to morphia or other remedies for ordinary neuralgia.

The alkalies, which attained some reputation after Mialhe claimed for them the power of destroying sugar in the blood and of neutralizing the fatty acids which were thought to accumulate there in consequence of the deficient action of the skin, are not often used at the present day. Potassium carbonate was the favorite preparation, and in the hands of Pavy its use seems to have been followed by good results. He gave it in 10, 15, and 20 grain doses in combination with aromatic spirit of {230} ammonia. Sodium bicarbonate was less satisfactory, as were also potassium acetate, potassium citrate, and Rochelle salts. These were given in doses of from four drachms to an ounce daily. In Germany, too, the alkaline treatment has been used to some extent.

As is the case with so many diseases which are incurable by any special treatment, a large number of remedies have at different times been suggested for diabetes, mostly on a foundation which does not admit of close analysis. One of these was the nitrate of uranium, suggested by Dale of Lemont, Pennsylvania, who gave it in doses of 1 grain three times daily, increased to 3 if necessary, in pill, powder, or solution, by aid of a few drops of nitric acid. He appears, however, to have used it in connection with a selected diet. I have tried it both with and without a selected diet; in the latter case there was no effect, and in the former there was none which the diet alone would not have produced.

Sodium phosphate, salicylic acid, salicylate of sodium, have all been used, it is claimed, with good results, and the late Dr. Dougherty of Newark, New Jersey, used with apparent advantage a mixture into which all of these, together with sodium carbonate, entered, made up with glycerin, tincture of cardamom, and water, the doses being 2½, 2½, 4½, and 8½ grains respectively. Moleschott has also obtained good results with salicylic acid.

{231}

SCROFULA.

BY JOHN S. LYNCH, M.D.

SYNONYMS.--Scrophula, Scrofulosis, Morbus scrophulosus, Struma, King's evil, The evil, Quince, Cruels and Crewels (Scotice).

DEFINITION.--A morbid condition of the system manifested by a peculiar liability to certain forms of nutritive disorders of the skin, mucous membranes, joints, bones, organs of special sense, and especially the lymphatic glands.

There is probably no disease of which it is more difficult to give an exact and satisfactory definition than scrofula. The general tendency of medical opinion within the last few decades has been to narrow the significance of the term, and even to restrict it to those slow and indolent inflammations and over-growths of lymphatic tissue which end in caseation and finally imperfect suppuration. Formerly almost every deviation from healthy functional activity in the young, as well as every disorder of nutrition which could not be assigned to any definite cause, was called struma; and thus, as Heule well remarks,[1] "Scrofula became the receptacle into which one vaguely casts all the ailments which afflict children under fourteen years, and of which we do not know the cause."

[Footnote 1: _Handbuch der Rationellen Pathologie_.]

Before hereditary syphilis was understood all its manifestations were classed as scrofulous, and at least one eminent authority in the United States[2] has expressed the opinion that scrofula is only a manifestation of the syphilitic poison in the second or third generation. Rickets, chronic hydrocephalus, favus, lice, and worms (Lugol), diabetes (Carmichael), and even scirrhus and cancer (R. Hamilton), have all been classed as scrofulous diseases. Then there is a large class of unhealthy persons whose morbid state can be no more definitely expressed than by saying that they are "delicate" or of "feeble health" or of "frail constitution," and by some all these are included under the term scrofulous. But as knowledge advances, and pathological knowledge as well as diagnostic acumen becomes larger and keener, many of these affections and morbid conditions can be eliminated from scrofula and assigned their true pathological and nosological position.

[Footnote 2: S. D. Gross, _Transactions American Medical Association_, 1878.]

To many who have been educated in the more modern schools of medical thought, therefore, our definition will appear much too broad, while to others it may appear too narrow.

Scrofula is essentially and purely a diathetic, not a cachectic, disease. {232} It is true that what may be called the manifestations or lesions of the disease are often excited by some preceding dyscrasia, and also that the long persistence of these lesions may excite a cachectic condition which we might call the scrofulous cachexia; still, as many children suffer from the lesions of scrofula who have never exhibited any evidence of a precedent dyscrasia, but on the contrary appear to be in perfect health, and many others, on the other hand, show unmistakable evidence of ill-health and are decidedly dyscrasic, yet are never attacked by scrofula, it is believed that every subject of scrofula becomes so not because of any pre-existing dyscrasia or cachexia, but because of some peculiar condition of the system--innate or acquired--which constitutes a diathesis.

"The hypothesis," says Niemeyer,[3] "that scrofula depends upon a faulty composition of the blood (dyscrasia), and that the lesions found in scrofulous persons were due to a deposit in the tissues of a matter circulated by the blood and called a scrofulous material, is almost universally abandoned."

[Footnote 3: _Textbook of Practical Medicine_, vol. ii.]

But while insisting upon the peculiar and, so to say, specific origin of the disease in some special condition of the system, without which it will never exist, it is admitted that the lesions of scrofula do not differ essentially from other similar lesions of the same tissues of a non-scrofulous origin. They are mostly of an inflammatory nature, and are only to be distinguished by the often trivial character of their exciting causes--often, indeed, by the total absence of any known exciting cause--and by their tediousness and intractability.

ETIOLOGY.--We believe, as already stated above, that the essential cause of scrofula is some peculiarity in the constitution of the tissues of the scrofulous subject; and we think it highly probable that H. F. Formad of Philadelphia has pointed out what constitutes this peculiarity. He declares--and the correctness of his observation has been abundantly verified--that microscopic examination of the tissues of certain animals characterized by their extreme aptness to be affected by scrofula and tuberculosis, as well as of children known to have been scrofulous or tuberculous, discloses the fact that the lymph-spaces in these subjects are always more numerous, larger, and more crowded with cells than in non-scrofulous subjects. The tissues of the scrofulous are therefore coarser, less compact and solid, and there is a greater tendency to undue cell-growth, than in the non-scrofulous. And these are precisely the characteristics which they present clinically, and such as we might have, a priori, expected to find.

This peculiarity of anatomical structure is in a large number of cases undoubtedly inherited from the parents, but while heredity plays, as is well known, an important part in the etiology of struma, it is not the essential factor. Bad hygienic surroundings, overcrowding, and consequent want of fresh air, improper food, consisting of a too great proportion of starch, during the early months or years of life, will cause the growing tissues to assume the peculiar anatomical arrangement alluded to above. "A coarse diet, containing but little nourishment in comparison with its bulk, is especially held in evil repute. The earlier this injudicious feeding of an infant commences, so much the greater danger that it will become scrofulous; hence the children fed on pap furnish a very important contingent to the army of scrofulous persons."[4] The {233} well-known fact that few children at the breast suffer from scrofulous lesions, but that a large number do so within the first two or three years after weaning, certainly tells in favor of the belief that too much starch and an insufficiency of animal food favor, if they do not actually produce, that faulty nutrition and construction of tissues which we believe lies at the foundation of the scrofulous diathesis. Independent, however, of improper food and the other predisposing causes mentioned, it is quite probable that faulty nutrition caused by accidental disease of the digestive or assimilative organs during infancy may create a predisposition. How else can we account for those not very rare cases in which from parents perfectly free from any scrofulous taint a large family of children may be reared, of which only one will suffer from any scrofulous lesions? Two such instances have been brought to my notice, and as the children in these cases lived upon a farm on the water-side, and enjoyed an abundance of pure air and salt-water bathing, and were certainly not stinted in food of proper quality, it is difficult to account for the acquired diathesis except upon the hypothesis above. Among the general predisposing causes of scrofula in addition to the special ones I have mentioned may be added--

[Footnote 4: Niemeyer, _loc. cit._]

1. Locality and Climate.--It has long been believed that scrofula is more common in the temperate zone than in the extreme north or in the tropics. While this is probably true, it must be stated that a sufficient amount of reliable statistics bearing upon this point have not yet been collected to prove the fact beyond cavil. That we should find that the disease prevails more extensively in cold and damp situations than in warmer and drier ones is to be expected, since the former conditions involve a greater confinement within dwellings, and consequently a diminished supply of fresh air, which, as we have seen, constitutes one of the predisposing causes of scrofula. Moreover, it is in these situations we would encounter a greater number of catarrhs, which, as we shall see, are known to be among the most active of the exciting causes of the glandular affections of scrofula.

2. Season.--For the same reason we find that a large number of cases of scrofula make their appearance in the early spring months, the results of catarrh contracted during the previous winter or of the sudden changes of temperature which accompany the transition of winter to summer.

3. Age.--Scrofula is essentially a disease of early life, but not exclusively so. As the diathesis can only be acquired directly from the parent, or fortuitously by malnutrition during the period of active growth, it follows that it becomes established, if at all, before the age of twenty years. And as the predisposition seems to be quite strong in most cases, and as the exciting causes are more apt to be applied during the earlier years of life, it is not surprising that a very large majority of the cases occur between the ages of three and fifteen years. A few, however, escape during childhood, and only suffer from it between twenty and thirty, while a small number only develop the disease in old age. Rindfleisch mentions the period between twenty and thirty as a common one for the development of hereditary scrofula; and senile scrofula was first pointed out by Sir James Paget.[5] In all these cases of deferred {234} manifestation of the scrofulous diathesis--and they are not very numerous--it is to be presumed that they have escaped the most active of the exciting causes of the disease. Indeed, it is natural that a person having inherited the predisposition should be more sedulously guarded--at first by his parents, and afterward by himself--against the exciting causes of scrofula during infancy and adolescence.

[Footnote 5: _Clinical Lectures and Essays_, London, 1875.]

4. Sex.--There is no reason to believe that sex plays any part in the predisposition to this disease. Both sexes seem to be affected in about equal proportions, but from the statistics bearing upon this point it does seem to have some influence in determining the variety of its lesions. Thus, females seem to be more frequently affected with glandular disease, while males suffer from diseases of the joints in the form of coxalgia, white swelling of the knee, and Pott's disease.

5. Condition in Life: Social Position.--If what we have said about the predisposing influence of improper or insufficient food, overcrowding, etc. be true, it will naturally be inferred that a large proportion of the cases of scrofula will be found in the lower strata of society; and this is true. Especially in cities, where the disease prevails most extensively, we always find that the denizens of narrow streets, lanes, and alleys furnish the largest contingent to the deaths as well as the deformities from scrofula. It is here that the poor congregate to avail themselves of the cheaper rents, and here will be found combined all those predisposing causes which may be briefly summed up in one word--poverty. It is true that cases of scrofula are quite numerous in the country, and in a note to Sir Thomas Watson's _Practice of Physic_ (1851) D. Francis Condie quotes from a work on _The Nature and Causes of Scrofula_, by Phillips, statistics which showed a greater preponderance of deaths from scrofula in a given number of the rural population than a nearly equal urban one. But at the time these statistics were gathered in England (and perhaps now) it is probable that there was a comparatively greater number of abjectly poor people among the rural population than in London, where was congregated such a large number of small tradesmen, artisans, and laborers, who, though not well-to-do, were better paid, and consequently lived better, than the agricultural laborers. Of course, a certain number of cases of scrofula are found in the United States, and perhaps in all other countries, among the children of the wealthy. These, however, are almost invariably caused either by direct transmission from parents or by some accidental injury to the digestive and assimilative organs in early childhood, as we have already pointed out. When it is remembered that in the constantly changing fortunes which are so frequently witnessed in this age of excessive activities, and that in the grand opportunities for obtaining wealth furnished by the liberal institutions and rapidly-growing industries of the United States the descendant of the pauper of the last generation may be the millionaire of the present, it is not surprising that so many who are now wealthy may possess the strumous diathesis as an inheritance from their parents or grandparents, and which they in turn transmit to their offspring.

6. Consanguineous Marriage.--It has long been a popular belief that the offspring of parents closely related by blood are more apt to be scrofulous than when no such relation has existed. Indeed, not only scrofula, but numerous other diseases, deformities, and imperfections have been {235} ascribed to such unions. Idiocy or feeble-mindedness has also been especially accredited to the production of such marriages. But a thorough investigation of this point in England some years ago demonstrated positively that no more idiotic, feeble-minded, or insane children are born of such marriages than of an equal number of marriages contracted between persons not related by blood to each other. There is, however, this amount of truth in the popular belief: if persons closely related to each other possess the scrofulous diathesis, there will be a greater probability--almost certainty--that the diathesis will be transmitted to their offspring. If one parent only is tainted with scrofula, and the other is entirely free from it, there is a possibility--even a probability--that some or all of the children may escape.

7. Complexion and Temperament.--It has been stated by some observers that scrofula occurred principally in the fair-haired, and with equal positiveness by others that it was in the dark-haired that the disease found the most of its victims. Such statistics as have been furnished, however, upon this subject seem to show that there is no connection whatever between scrofula and complexion. It will generally be found that whenever in any country or locality more cases of scrofula occur in persons of one or the other of the complexions, it is only because that particular complexion is the predominant type among the inhabitants of that locality.

8. Race and Nationality.--While it would seem that no race or nation is entirely free from struma, yet there are certainly in the United States two peoples who furnish an enormously disproportionate number of scrofulous cases: these are the Irish and Jews. Among the first of these both scrofula and tuberculosis abound with exceeding frequency, while among the latter it is scrofula alone which seems to predominate. The last, however, are not exempt from tuberculosis, but only exhibit about an equal predisposition to it with their fellow-citizens. It is not difficult to explain the special predisposition of these peoples to scrofula when their past history is taken into account in connection with what has been said about the bad influence of food and surroundings in producing the scrofulous diathesis. The principal food of the Irish peasantry--oppressed and ground into poverty by their Anglo-Saxon conquerors for hundreds of years--have been bread and potatoes, often potatoes alone. It cannot be surprising, therefore, that Irish children fed upon this diet and reared in ill-ventilated hovels should develop the scrofulous diathesis in legions. The Jews, too, oppressed by all nations through ages, have been during many generations reared in poverty and squalor. Even those of them who in not very remote times had acquired by thrift the means of securing both the comforts and luxuries of life dared not live according to their means, lest a show of wealth should attract the unpleasant, often fatal, attention of their rapacious and unscrupulous Christian or Mohammedan neighbors. This condition, this mode of life, has existed among them for many hundreds of years, and has so intensified the strumous diathesis among them that almost the whole race may be said to be patently or latently scrofulous. The negro or African race, however, as observed by the writer in the Southern States of the American Union, do not seem to have developed any special predisposition to struma, notwithstanding their servile condition. This, at first sight, would seem to {236} be contrary to our expectation based on what has been said about Jews and Irishmen. But as my remark has been predicated only on observation of the African in the Southern States, where the climate is not favorable for the development of scrofula, the fact is not so surprising. Besides, the food of these people consisted largely of bacon or pork, fish, milk, and the succulent fruits and vegetables, with a moderate quantity of corn bread, and very rarely potatoes. As the rude cabins in which they dwelt were usually constructed of unhewn logs and covered with rough boards, and cost almost nothing except labor, overcrowding was unknown and ventilation always perfect. The waiter practised medicine fourteen years in Wilcox county (S. W.), Alabama, containing a population in 1870 of 28,377, of whom 21,610 were colored, and during this time saw only two cases of genuine scrofula and one of tuberculosis among the colored population.

Pork as an article of food has often been accused of producing a tendency to scrofula, but evidently with great injustice, for we have seen that the Jews, who never eat it, are almost universally scrofulous, while the Southern negroes, whose staple animal food it was, were conspicuously free from it.

9. Acquired Scrofula.--Although in perhaps a majority of all scrofulous cases the diathesis has been inherited from the parents, the fact cannot be too strongly emphasized that in a large number of cases the disease may be developed de novo, independent of such heredity. To scrofula developed from the influence of bad ventilation and overcrowding, absence of sunlight, insufficient, bad, or unsuitable food, cold and damp, imperfect clothing--in short, all those conditions associated with poverty, squalor, and ignorance--Grancher has well applied the term la scrofula a miseria. And it is only by a clear comprehension that scrofula may be, and often is, developed under these conditions that the medical profession in general, and municipal health authorities in particular, may be induced to teach and enforce upon the poor both the knowledge and the practice which may prevent it. Even in the open country, where there is at least no lack of pure air and light, the lesson can be enforced with equal profit; for the children of the farm-laborer are likely to be imperfectly and improperly fed, and lodged in apartments at night that in the matter of foul air and filth could not be well surpassed in the purlieus of the dirtiest and most overcrowded city.

EXCITING CAUSES.--The actual exciting causes of scrofula when the diathesis already exists are too numerous to be mentioned in detail. Indeed, almost any trivial injury or inflammation, any disease which has produced a temporary cachexia, may rouse into activity the perhaps hitherto latent tendency. How often do we see a slight blow upon the knee-joint produce a white swelling which lames for life the heretofore healthy and active boy or girl! A fall upon the hip which was almost unnoticed at the time excites a coxalgia which either destroys life or renders the child for life a cripple; or a slight jar of the spine induces a disease of the vertebræ which, if recovered from at all, produces a terrible deformity. A slight eczema of the face or scalp or a catarrh of the mouth or throat will excite that slow and generally painless enlargement and induration of a neighboring lymphatic gland which always ends in its caseation and final destruction by suppuration. A slight injury to the {237} periosteum may excite a destructive caries or necrosis of the underlying bone, and a temporary catarrh of the intestines a tabes mesenterica with all its fatal consequences.

Speaking generally, it may be said that anything that produces a local disorder of nutrition or impairs the health generally of a person predisposed to scrofula is sufficient to bring about some manifestations of the disease. They are especially apt to follow the eruptive fevers. Measles and scarlatina are very commonly arousers of the scrofulous process, not only by the temporary impairment of health which follows them, but also through the catarrhs which are usually present in both diseases. Vaccination has often been accused of imparting scrofula; and, although this is untrue, since scrofula cannot be imparted in the sense of transference from one person to another, there can be no doubt that the predisposition may be roused into activity by the slight impairment of health associated with vaccination or by the slight injury inflicted at the point of introduction of the vaccinal virus. In some cases the disease has manifested itself for the first time during pregnancy or lactation, and there is no doubt that in cases where the disease has existed in childhood these conditions often cause it to reappear. In conclusion, it must be said that many cases apparently occur spontaneously--"the disease came on of itself"--or if there are any exciting causes they were so trivial as to have escaped notice altogether.