Chapter XXXVIII: Part 38

By the provisions of the Treaty of Utrecht, Philip V. of Spain
was left with no dominions in Italy, the Italian possessions
of the Spanish monarchy having been transferred to Austria.
Philip might have accepted this arrangement without demur. Not
so his wife—"Elizabeth Farnese, a lady of the Italian family
for whom the Duchy of Parma had been created by the Pope. The
crown of Spain was settled on her step-son. For her own child
the ambitious queen desired the honours of a crown. Cardinal
Alberoni, a reckless and ambitious ecclesiastic, was the
minister of the Spanish court. Under his advice and instigated
by the queen, Philip claimed the possessions in Italy, which
in the days of his grandfather had belonged to the Spanish
crown. When his title to that crown was admitted, he denied
the right of the other powers of Europe to alienate from it
its possessions. This was not all: in right of his queen he
claimed the duchies of Parma and of Tuscany. She determined to
recover for him all the Italian possessions of the Spanish
crown, and to add to them the duchies of Parma and Tuscany.
The Duke of Parma was old and childless. The extinction of the
reigning line of the Medici was near. Cosmo di Medici, the
reigning sovereign, was old. His only son, Jean Gaston, was
not likely to leave heirs. To Parma Elizabeth advanced her
claims as heiress of the family of Farnese; to Tuscany she
asserted a more questionable title in right of a descent from
the family of Medici. These duchies she demanded for her son,
Don Carlos, in whose behalf she was ready to waive her own
claims. The success of these demands would have given to the
Spanish monarchy even greater power than it had before
enjoyed. To Naples, Sicily, and Milan, would have been added
the territories of Parma and Tuscany. All Europe denounced the
ambitious projects of Alberoni as entirely inconsistent with
that balance of power which it had then become a political
superstition to uphold. Philip's French relatives were
determined in opposition to his claims; and to resist them the
quadruple alliance was formed between Holland, England, France
and the emperor. The parties to this alliance offered to the
Spanish Bourbons that the emperor should settle on Don Carlos
the reversion to the duchies of Parma and Tuscany on their
lapsing to him by the failure of the reigning families without
heirs. These proposals were rejected, and it was not until the
Spanish court found the combination of four powerful monarchs
too strong for them, that they reluctantly acceded to the
terms of the Quadruple Alliance, and accepted for Don Carlos
the promised reversion of Parma and Tuscany. To induce the
emperor to accede to this arrangement the Duke of Savoy was
compelled to surrender to him his newly-acquired kingdom of
Sicily, receiving instead the island of Sardinia with its
kingly title. It is as kings of Sardinia that the princes of
Savoy have since been known in European history. The treaty of
the quadruple alliance was thus the second by which at this
period the European powers attempted to arrange the affairs of
Italy. This treaty left the house of Austria in possession of
Sicily and Naples. It was assented to by Spain in 1720.
European complications unconnected with Italy produced new
wars and a new treaty; and the treaty of Seville in 1724,
followed by one entered into at Vienna two years later,
confirmed Don Carlos in the duchy of Parma, of which, on the
death of the last of the Farnese in 1734, he entered into
possession. A dispute as to the election of a king of Poland
gave the Spanish court an opportunity of once more attempting
the resumption of the Neapolitan dominions. Don Carlos, the
second son of Philip and Elizabeth, was now just grown to
man's estate. His father placed in his hand the sword which he
himself had received from Louis XIV. Don Carlos was but
seventeen years old when he took possession of his sovereignty
of Parma. In the same year [1734] he was called from it to
invade the Sicilian dominions of Austria. He conquered in
succession the continental territories, and the island of
Sicily; and on the 15th of June, 1734, he was proclaimed as
King of the Two Sicilies. The war of the Polish Succession was
ended in the following year by a peace, the preliminaries of
which were signed at Vienna. In this treaty an entirely new
arrangement of Italian affairs was introduced. The rights of
Don Carlos to the kingdoms of Naples and Sicily were
recognised. Parma was surrendered to the emperor; and, lastly,
the duchy of Tuscany was disposed of to a new claimant
[Francis of Lorraine] for the honours of an Italian prince."

_I. Butt,
History of Italy,
volume 1, chapter 5._

ALSO IN:
_E. Armstrong,
Elisabeth Farnese,
chapters 2-10._

_P. Colletta,
History of the Kingdom of Naples, 1734-1856,
book 1, chapter 1-2._

See, also,
SPAIN: A. D. 1713-1725;
and FRANCE: A. D. 1733-1735.

ITALY: A. D. 1719.
The Emperor and the Duke of Savoy exchange Sardinia for
Sicily.

See SPAIN: A. D. 1713-1725.

ITALY: A. D. 1733-1735.
Franco-Austrian War.
Invasion of the Milanese by the French.
Naples and Sicily occupied by the Spaniards and erected into a
kingdom for Don Carlos.

See FRANCE: A. D. 1733-1735.

{1850}

ITALY: A. D. 1741-1743.
The War of the Austrian Succession:
Ambitious undertakings of Spain.

"The struggle between England and Spain had altogether merged
in the great European war, and the chief efforts of the
Spaniards were directed against the Austrian dominions in
Italy.

See ENGLAND: A. D. 1739-1741.

The kingdom of Naples, which had passed under Austrian rule
during the war of the [Spanish] Succession, had, as we have
seen, been restored to the Spanish line in the war which ended
in 1740, and Don Carlos, who ruled it, was altogether
subservient to Spanish policy. The Duke of Lorraine, the
husband of Maria Theresa, was sovereign of Tuscany; and the
Austrian possessions consisted of the Duchy of Milan, and the
provinces of Mantua and Placentia. They were garrisoned at the
opening of the war by only 15,000 men, and their most
dangerous enemy was the King of Sardinia, who had gradually
extended his dominions into Lombardy, and whose army was,
probably, the largest and most efficient in Italy. 'The
Milanese,' his father is reported to have said, 'is like an
artichoke, to be eaten leaf by leaf,' and the skill and
perseverance with which for many generations the House of
Savoy pursued that policy, have in our own day had their
reward. Spanish troops had landed at Naples as early as
November 1741. The King of Sardinia, the Prince of Modena, and
the Republic of Genoa were on the same side. Venice was
completely neutral, Tuscany was compelled to declare herself
so, and a French army was soon to cross the Alps. The King of
Sardinia, however, at this critical moment, was alarmed by the
ambitious projects openly avowed by the Spaniards, and he was
induced by English influence to change sides. He obtained the
promise of certain territorial concessions from Austria, and
of an annual subsidy of £200,000 from England; and on these
conditions he suddenly marched with an army of 30,000 men to
the support of the Austrians. An the plans of the confederates
were disconcerted by this defection. The Spaniards went into
winter quarters near Bologna in October, fought an
unsuccessful battle at Campo Santo in the following February
[1743], and then retired to Rimini, leaving Lombardy in
complete tranquillity. The British fleet in the Mediterranean
had been largely strengthened by Carteret, and it did good
service to the cause. It burnt a Spanish squadron in the
French port of St. Tropez, compelled the King of Naples, by
the threat of bombardment, to withdraw his troops from the
Spanish army, and sign an engagement of neutrality, destroyed
large provisions of corn collected by the Genoese for the
Spanish army, and cut off that army from all communications by
sea."

_W. E. H. Lecky,
History of England, 18th Century,
chapter 3 (volume 1)._

ALSO IN:
_W. Coxe,
History of the House of Austria,
chapter 102 (volume 3)._

ITALY: A. D. 1743.
The War of the Austrian Succession: Treaty of Worms.

"By a treaty between Great Britain, the Queen of Hungary, and
the King of Sardinia, signed at Worms September 23rd, 1743,
Charles Emanuel renounced his pretensions to Milan; the Queen
of Hungary ceding to him the Vigevanesco, that part of the
duchy of Pavia between the Po and the Tessino, the town and
part of the duchy of Piacenza, and a portion of the district
of Anghiera. Also whatever rights she might have to the
marquisate of Finale hoping that the Republic of Genoa would
facilitate this agreement, in order that the King of Sardinia
might have a communication with the sea. The Queen of Hungary
promised to increase her army in Italy to 30,000 men as soon
as the affairs of Germany would permit; while the King of
Great Britain engaged to keep a strong fleet in the
Mediterranean, and to pay Charles Emanuel annually £200,000,
so long as the war lasted, he keeping in the field an army of
45,000 men."

_T. H. Dyer,
History of Modern Europe,
book 6, chapter 4 (volume 3)._

ITALY: A. D. 1743.
The Bourbon Family Compact (France and Spain) for establishing
Spanish claims.

See FRANCE: A. D. 1743 (OCTOBER).

ITALY: A. D. 1744.
The War of the Austrian Succession:
Indecisive campaigns.

"In Italy, the discordant views and mutual jealousies of Maria
Theresa and the king of Sardinia prevented the good effects
which might have been derived from their recent union. The
king was anxious to secure his own dominions on the side of
France, and to conquer the marquisate of Finale; while Maria
Theresa was desirous to direct her principal force against
Naples, and recover possession of the two Sicilies. Hence,
instead of co-operating for one great object, their forces
were divided; and, after an arduous and active campaign, the
Austrians were nearly in the same situation as at the
commencement of the year. Prince Lobcowitz being reinforced,
compelled the Spaniards to retreat successively from Pesara
and Senegallia, attacked them at Loretto and Reconati, and
drove them beyond the Fronto, the boundary of the kingdom of
Naples. Alarmed by the advance of the Austrians, the king of
Naples broke his neutrality, quitted his capital at the head
of 15,000 men, and hastened to join the Spaniards. But Prince
Lobcowitz … turned towards Rome, with the hope of
penetrating into Naples on that side; and, in the commencement
of June, reached the neighbourhood of Albano. His views were
anticipated by the king of Naples, who, dividing the Spanish
and Neapolitan troops into three columns, which were led by
himself, the duke of Modena, and the count de Gages, passed
through Anagm, Valmonte, and Monte Tortino, and reunited his
forces at Veletri, in the Campagna di Roma. In this situation,
the two hostile armies, separated only by a deep valley,
harassed each other with continual skirmishes. At length
prince Lobcowitz, in imitation of prince Eugene at Cremona,
formed the project of surprising the head-quarters of the king
of Naples. In the night of August 10th, a corps of Austrians,
led by count Brown, penetrated into the town of Veletri,
killed all who resisted, and would have surprised the king and
the duke of Modena in their beds, had they not been alarmed by
the French ambassador, and escaped to the camp. The Austrian
troops, giving way to pillage, were vigorously attacked by a
corps of Spaniards and Neapolitans, despatched from the camp,
and driven from the town with great slaughter, and the capture
of the second in command, the marquis de Novati. In this
contest, however, the Spanish army lost no less than 3,000
men. This daring exploit was the last offensive attempt of the
Austrian forces. Prince Lobcowitz perceiving his troops
rapidly decrease by the effects of the climate, and the
unwholesome air of the Pontine marshes, began his retreat in
the beginning of November, and though followed by an army
superior in number, returned without loss to Rimini, Pesaro,
Cesano, and Immola; while the combined Spaniards and
Neapolitans took up their quarters between Viterbo and Civita
Vecchia.
{1851}
In consequence of the expedition against Naples, the king of
Sardinia was left with 30,000 men, many of them new levies,
and 6,000 Austrians, to oppose the combined army of French and
Spaniards, who advanced on the side of Nice. After occupying
that place, the united army forced the intrenched camp of the
Sardinians, though defended by the king himself, made
themselves masters of Montalbano and Villafranca, and prepared
to penetrate into Piedmont along the sea coast. The Genoese,
irritated by the transfer of Finale, were inclined to
facilitate their operations; but were intimidated by the
presence of an English squadron which threatened to bombard
their capital. The prince of Conti, who commanded under the
infant Don Philip, did not, however, relinquish the invasion
of Piedmont, but formed the spirited project of leading his
army over the passes of the Alps, although almost every rock
was a fortress, and the obstacles of nature were assisted by
all the resources of art. He led his army, with a large train
of artillery, and numerous squadrons of cavalry, over
precipices and along beds of torrents, carried the fort of
Chateau Dauphin, forced the celebrated Barricades which were
deemed impregnable, descended the valley of the Stura, took
Demont after a slight resistance, and laid siege to Coni. The
king of Sardinia, having in vain attempted to stop the
progress of this torrent which burst the barriers of his
country, indignantly retired to Saluzzo, to cover his capital.
Being reinforced by 6,000 Austrians, he attempted to relieve
Coni, but was repulsed after a severe engagement, though he
succeeded in throwing succours into the town. This victory,
however, did not produce any permanent advantage to the
confederate forces; Coni continuing to hold out, the approach
of winter and the losses they had sustained, amounting to
10,000 men, compelled them to raise the siege and repass the
Alps, which they did not effect without extreme difficulty."

_W. Coxe,
History of the House of Austria,
chapter 105 (volume 3)._

ALSO IN:
_W. Russell,
History of Modern Europe,
part 2, chapter 28._

ITALY: A. D. 1745.
The War of he Austrian Succession:
Successes of the Spaniards, French and Genoese.

"The Italian campaign of 1745, in boldness of design and
rapidity of execution, scarcely finds a parallel in military
history, and was most unpropitious to the Queen of Hungary and
King of Sardinia. The experience of preceding years had taught
the Bourbon Courts that all attempts to carry their arms
across the Alps would be fruitless, unless they could secure a
stable footing in the dominions of some Italian state on the
other side, to counteract the power of their adversary, who
had the entire command of the passes between Germany and
Italy, by means of which reinforcements could be continually
drafted to the scene of action. Accordingly they availed
themselves of the jealousy and alarm excited at Genoa, by the
transfer of Finale to the King of Sardinia, to engage that
republic on their side. The plan was to unite the two armies
which had wintered on the distant frontiers of Naples and
Provence, in the vicinity of Genoa, where they were to be
joined by 10,000 auxiliaries on the part of the republic.
Charles Emanuel was sensible of the terrible consequences to
himself, should the Genoese declare openly for the house of
Bourbon, and sent General Pallavicini, a man of address and
abilities, to renounce his pretensions to Finale, while
Admiral Rowley, with a British fleet, hovered on their coasts.
In spite of all this, nevertheless, the treaty of Aranjuez was
concluded between France, Spain, and Genoa. After surmounting
amazing difficulties, and making the most arduous and
astonishing marches, the army commanded by Don Philip, who was
accompanied by the French General Maillebois, and that
commanded by Count de Gages, effected their junction on the
14th of June, near Genoa, when their united forces, now under
Don Philip, amounted to 78,000 men. All that the King of
Sardinia could do under these circumstances, was to make the
best dispositions to defend the Milanese, the Parmesan, and
the Plaisantine; but the whole disposable force under the King
and Count Schulenburg, the successor of Lobkowitz, did not
amount to above 45,000 men. Count Gages with 30,000 men was to
be opposed to Schulenburg, and took possession of Serravalle,
on the Scrivia; then advancing towards Alessandria he obliged
the Austrians to retire under the cannon of Tortona. Don
Philip made himself master of Acqui, so that the King of
Sardinia, with the Austrian General, Count Schulenburg, had to
retreat behind the Tanaro. On the 24th of July the strong
citadel of Tortona was taken by the Spaniards, which opened
the way to the occupation of Parma and Placentia. The combined
army of French, Spanish, Neapolitans, and Genoese being now
masters of an extensive tract with all the principal towns
south of the Po, they readily effected a passage near the
confluence of the Ticino, and with a detachment surprised
Pavia. The Austrians, fearful for the Milanese, separated
accordingly from the Sardinian troops. The Bourbon force
seeing this, suddenly reunited, gained the Tanaro by a rapid
movement on the night of the 27th of September, forded it in
three columns, although the water reached to the very necks of
the soldiers, fell upon the unsuspecting and unprepared
Sardinians, broke their cavalry in the first charge, and drove
the enemy in dismay and confusion to Valenza. Charles Emanuel
fled to Casale, where he reassembled his broken army, in order
to save it from utter ruin. The confederate armies still
advanced, drove the King back and took Trino and Verua, which
last place lay but twenty miles from his capital: fearful now
that this might be bombarded he hastened thither, withdrew his
forces under its cannon, and ordered the pavement of the city
to be taken up. Maillebois, on his side, penetrated into the
Milanese, and by the month of October the territories of the
house of Austria in Italy were wholly subdued. The whole of
Lombardy being thus open, Don Philip made a triumphant entry
into Milan on the 20th of December, fondly hoping that he had
secured for himself an Italian kingdom, as his brother, Don
Carlos, had done at Naples. The Austrian garrison, however,
still maintained the citadel of Milan and the fortress of
Mantua."

_Sir E. Cust,
Annals of the Wars of the 18th Century,
volume 2, pages 75-76._

ALSO IN:
_A. Gallenga,
History of Piedmont,
volume 3, chapter 4._

{1852}

ITALY: A. D. 1746-1747.
The War of the Austrian Succession: A turn of fortune.
The Spaniards and French abandon North Italy.
The Austrians in Genoa, and their expulsion from the city.

"Of all the Austrian possessions in Lombardy, little remained
except the fortress of Mantua and the citadel of Milan; while
the citadels of Asti and Alessandria, the keys of Piedmont,
were expected to fall before the commencement of the ensuing
campaign. On the return of the season for action, the struggle
for the mastery of Italy was renewed, and the queen of Spain
already saw in imagination the crown of Lombardy gracing the
brow of her second son. On the east, the French and Spanish
armies had extended themselves as far as Reggio, Placentia,
and Guastalla; on the north they were masters of the whole
country between the Adda and Tesino; they blockaded the
passages by the lake of Como and the Lago Maggiore, and were
preparing to reduce the citadel of Milan; on the west their
posts extended as far as Casale and Asti, though of the last
the citadel was still held by the Sardinians. The main body of
the French secured the communication with Genoa and the
country south of the Po; a strong body at Reggio, Parma, and
Placentia, covered their conquests on the east; and the
Spaniards commanded the district between the Po and the
mountains of Tyrol. The Sardinians were collected into the
neighbourhood of Trino; while the Austrians fell back into the
Novarrese to effect a junction with the reinforcements which
were daily expected from Germany. In this situation, a sudden
revolution took place in the fortune of the war. The empress
queen [Maria Theresa], by the conclusion of a peace with
Prussia, was at liberty to reinforce her army in Italy, and
before the end of February 30,000 men had already descended
from the Trentine Alps, and spread themselves as far as the
Po." This change of situation caused the French court to make
overtures to the king of Sardinia, which gave great offense to
Spain. The wily Sardinian gained time by his negotiations with
the French, until he found an opportunity, by suddenly ending
the armistice, to capture the French garrison in Asti, to
relieve the citadel of Alessandria and to lay siege to
Valenza. "These disasters compelled Maillebois [the French
general] to abandon his distant posts and concentrate his
forces between Novi and Voghera, in order to maintain the
communication with Genoa. Nor were the Spaniards beyond the Po
in a less critical situation. A column of 10,000 Austrians
under Berenclau having captured Codogno, and advanced to Lodi,
the Spanish general was compelled to withdraw his troops from
the passes towards the lakes, to send his artillery to Pavia
and draw towards the Po. The infant had scarcely quitted Milan
before a party of Austrian hussars entered the place."
Meantime, the Spanish general Castelar, blockaded in Parma by
the Austrians, broke through their lines and gained the
eastern Riviera, with the loss of half his force. In June, the
Spaniards and French, concentrated at Placentia, made a
powerful attack on the Austrians, to arrest their progress,
but were repulsed with heavy loss. The Sardinians soon
afterwards formed a junction with the Austrians, which
compelled the Spaniards and French to evacuate Placentia and
retreat to Genoa, abandoning stores and artillery and losing
many men. In the midst of these disasters, the Spanish king,
Philip V., died, and his widowed queen, Elizabeth Farnese
—the "Spanish termagant," Carlyle calls her—who had been
the moving spirit of the struggle for Italy, lost the reins of
government. His son (by his first wife, Maria Louisa of Savoy)
who succeeded him, had no ambitions and no passions to
interest him in the war, and resolved to escape from it. The
marquis Las Minas, whom he sent to take command of the
retreating army, speedily announced his intention to abandon
Italy. "Thus deserted, the situation of the French and Genoese
became desperate. … Maillebois, after exhorting the Genoese
to defend their territory to the last extremity, was obliged
to follow the example of Las Minas in withdrawing towards
Provence. Abandoned to their fate, the Genoese could not
withstand the combined attacks of the Austro-Sardinians,
assisted by the British fleet. The city surrendered almost at
discretion; the garrison were made prisoners of war; the
stores, arms and artillery were to be delivered; the doge and
six senators to repair to Vienna and implore forgiveness. The
marquis of Botta, who had replaced Lichtenstein in the
command, took possession of the place with 15,000 men, while
the king of Sardinia occupied Finale and reduced Savona. In
consequence of this success the Austrian court meditated the
re-conquest of Naples and Sicily, which had been drained of
troops to support the war in Lombardy." But this project was
overruled by the British government, and the allied army
crossed the Var, to carry the war into the southeastern
provinces of France. "Their progress was, however, instantly
arrested by an insurrection at Genoa, occasioned by the
exactions and oppressions of the Austrian commanders. The
garrison was expelled by the tumultuary efforts of the
populace; and the army, to obviate the mischiefs of this
unexpected reverse, hastily measured back its steps. Instead
of completing the disasters of the Bourbon troops, the
Austro-Sardinians employed the whole winter in the investment
of Genoa." The siege was protracted but unsuccessful, and the
allies were forced to abandon it the following summer, on the
approach of the Bourbon forces, which resumed the offensive
under Marshal Belleisle. After delivering Genoa, the latter
sent a detachment of his army into Piedmont, where it met with
disaster. No further operations of importance were undertaken
before the conclusion of the peace, which was then being
negotiated at Aix-la-Chapelle.

_W. Coxe,
Memoirs of the Bourbon Kings of Spain,
chapters 46-48 (volumes 3-4)._

ALSO IN:
_J. T. Bent,
Genoa,
chapter 16._

ITALY: A. D. 1749-1792.
Peace in the Peninsula.

The Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle "left nothing to Austria in
Italy except the duchies of Milan and Mantua. Although the
grand-duchy of Tuscany was settled on the family of
Hapsburg-Lorraine, every precaution was taken to prevent that
province from being united with the German possessions of
their house. The arrangements of the treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle
continued up to the period of the French revolution
undisturbed. Those arrangements, although the result of a
compromise of the interests and ambitions of rival statesmen,
were not, considering the previous state of Italy,
unfavourable to the cause of Italian independence.
{1853}
Piedmont, already recognised as the protector of Italian
nationality, gained not only in rank, but in substantial
territory, by the acquisition of the island of Sardinia, still
more by that of the High Novarese, and by extending her
frontier to the Ticino. Naples and Sicily were released from
the tyranny of viceroys, and placed under a resident king,
with a stipulation to secure their future independence, that
they should never be united to the Spanish crown. … In the
45 [?] years which elapsed between the treaty of
Aix-la-Chapelle and the French revolution, Italy enjoyed a
perfect and uninterrupted peace. In some, at least, of its
principalities, its progress in prosperity and in legislation
was rapid. Naples and Sicily, under the government of Charles
III., and subsequently under the regency of his minister,
Tanucci, were ruled with energy and prudence. Tuscany
prospered under the sway of the princes of Lorraine, Milan and
Mantua were mildly governed by the Austrian court; and
Lombardy rose from the misery to which the exactions of
Spanish viceroys had reduced even the great resources of that
rich and fertile province. In the other Italian States at
least no change had taken place for the worse. Industry
everywhere flourished under the presence of the most essential
of all blessings,—peace."

_I. Butt,
History of Italy,
volume 1, chapter 5._

ITALY: A. D. 1792-1793.
Annexation of Savoy and Nice to the French Republic.
Sardinia and the Two Sicilies in the coalition against France.

See FRANCE: A. D. 1792 (SEPTEMBER-DECEMBER);
and 1793 (MARCH-SEPTEMBER).

ITALY: A. D. 1794-1795.
Passes of the Maritime Alps secured by the French.
The coalition abandoned by the Grand Duke of Tuscany.
French successes at Loano.

See FRANCE: A. D. 1794-1795 (OCTOBER-MAY);
and 1795 (JUNE-DECEMBER).

ITALY: A. D. 1796-1797.
French invasion.
Bonaparte's first campaigns.
His victories and his pillage.
Expulsion of the Austrians.
French treaties with Genoa and Naples.
The Cispadane and Cisalpine Republics.
Surrender of Papal territories.
Peace preliminaries of Leoben.

See FRANCE: A. D. 1796 (APRIL-OCTOBER), and (OCTOBER);
and 1796-1797 (OCTOBER-APRIL).

ITALY: A. D. 1797 (MAY-OCTOBER).
Creation of the Ligurian and Cisalpine Republics.
The Peace of Campo-Formio.
Lombardy relinquished by Austria.
Venice and Venetian territory made over to her.

See FRANCE: A. D. 1797 (MAY-OCTOBER).

ITALY: A. D. 1797-1798 (December-May).
French occupation of Rome.
Formation of the Roman Republic.
Removal of the Pope.

See FRANCE: A. D. 1797-1798 (DECEMBER-MAY).

ITALY: A. D. 1798-1799.
Overthrow of the Neapolitan Kingdom.
Creation of the Parthenopeian Republic.
Relinquishment of Piedmont by the king of Sardinia.
French reverses.

See FRANCE: A. D.1798-1799 (AUGUST-APRIL).

ITALY: A. D. 1799 (APRIL-AUGUST).
Successful Austro-Russian campaign.
Suwarrow's victories.
French evacuation of Lombardy, Piedmont and Naples.

See FRANCE: A. D. 1799 (APRIL-SEPTEMBER).

ITALY: A. D. 1799 (AUGUST-DECEMBER).
Austrian successes.
Expulsion of the French.
Fall of the Parthenopeian and Roman Republics.

See FRANCE: A. D. 1799 (AUGUST-DECEMBER).

ITALY: A. D. 1800.
Bonaparte's Marengo campaign.
Northern Italy recovered by the French.
Siege and capture of Genoa by the Austrians.

See FRANCE: A. D. 1800-1801 (MAY-FEBRUARY).

ITALY: A. D. 1800-1801 (JUNE-FEBRUARY).
The king of Naples spared by Napoleon.
Restoration of Papal authority at Rome.

See FRANCE: A. D. 1800-1801 (JUNE-FEBRUARY).

ITALY: A. D. 1802.
Name of the Cisalpine Republic changed to Italian Republic.
Bonaparte president.
Annexation of part of Piedmont, with Parma and Elba, to
France.

See FRANCE: A. D. 1801-1803,
and 1802 (AUGUST-SEPTEMBER).

ITALY: A. D. 1805.
Transformation of the Italian Republic into the Kingdom of
Italy.
Election and coronation of Napoleon.
Annexation of Genoa to France.

See FRANCE: A. D. 1804-1805.

ITALY: A. D. 1805.
Cession of Venetian territory by Austria to the Kingdom of
Italy.

See GERMANY: A. D. 1805-1806.

ITALY: A. D. 1805-1806.
Napoleon's dethronement of the dynasty of Naples.
Joseph Bonaparte made king of the Two Sicilies.

See FRANCE: A. D. 1805-1806 (DECEMBER-SEPTEMBER).

ITALY: A. D. 1807-1808.
Napoleon's visit.
His arbitrary changes in the constitution.
His public works.
His despotism.
His annexation of Tuscany to France, and seizure of the Papal
States.

See FRANCE: A. D. 1807-1808 (NOVEMBER-FEBRUARY).

ITALY: A. D. 1808 (JULY).
The crown of Naples resigned by Joseph Bonaparte (now king of
Spain) and conferred on Joachim Murat.

See SPAIN: A. D. 1808 (MAY-SEPTEMBER).

ITALY: (Southern): A. D. 1808-1809.
Beginning of the reign of Murat at Naples.
Expulsion of the English from Capri.
Insolence of Murat's soldiery.
Popular discontent and hatred.
Rise of the Carbonari.
Civil war in Calabria.

"Joachim Murat, the new King of Naples, announced his
accession to the nation [July, 1808]. 'The august Napoleon,'
he said, 'had given him the kingdom of the two Sicilies.
Gratitude to the donor, and a desire to benefit his subjects,
would divide his heart.' … The commencement of Murat's reign
was felicitous; the English, however, occupied the island of
Capri, which, being placed at the opening of the gulf, is the
key of the bay of Naples. Their presence stimulated all who
were averse to the new government, intimidated its adherents,
and impeded the freedom of navigation, to the manifest injury
of commerce; besides, it was considered disgraceful, that one
of the Napoleonides should suffer an enemy so near, and that
enemy the English, who were at once so hated and so despised.
The indolence of Joseph had patiently suffered the disgrace;
but Joachim, a spirited soldier, was indignant at it, and he
thought it necessary to commence his reign by some important
enterprise. He armed therefore against Capri: Sir Hudson Lowe
was there in garrison with two regiments collected from all
the nations of Europe, and which were called the Royal
Corsican and the Royal Maltese. … A body of French and
Neapolitans were sent from Naples and Salerno, under the
command of General Lamarque, to reduce the island; and they
effected a landing, by means of ladders hung to the rocks by
iron hooks, and thus possessed themselves of Anacarpi, though
not without great difficulty, as the English resolutely
defended themselves. …
{1854}
The siege proceeded but slowly—succours of men and
ammunition reached the besieged from Sicily; but fortune
favoured the enemy, as an adverse wind drove the English out
to sea. The King, who superintended the operations from the
shore of Massa, having waited at the point of Campanella,
seizing the propitious moment, sent fresh squadrons in aid of
Lamarque, and the English, being already broken, and the forts
dismantled, now yielded to the conqueror. The Neapolitans were
highly gratified by the acquisition of Capri, and from that
event augured well of the new government. The kingdom of
Naples contained three classes of people—barons, republicans,
and populace. The barons willingly joined the party of the new
king, because they were pleased by the honours granted to
them, and they were not without hopes of recovering their
ancient privileges, or at least of acquiring new ones. … The
republicans were, on the contrary, inimical to Joachim, not
because he was a king, for they easily accommodated themselves
to royalty; but because his conduct in Tuscany, where he had
driven them forth or bound them in chains like malefactors,
had rendered him personally obnoxious to them. They were
moreover disgusted by his incredible vanity, which led him to
court and caress with the most zealous adulation every bearer
of a feudal title. … The populace, who cared no more for
Joachim than they had done for Joseph, would easily have
contented themselves with the new government, if it had
protected them from the oppressions of the barons, and had
procured for them quiet and abundance. But Joachim, wholly
intent on courting the nobles, neglected the people, who,
oppressed by the barons and soldiery, became alienated from
him. … The spirit of discontent was further increased by his
introduction of the conscription laws of France. … Joachim,
a soldier himself, permitted every thing to his soldiery; and
an insupportable military license was the result. Hence, also,
they became the sole support of his power, and it took no root
in the affections of the people. The insolence of the troops
continually augmented not only every desire, but every caprice
of the head of a regiment, nay, even of the inferior officers,
was to be complied with, as if they were the laws of the
realm; and whosoever even lamented his subjection to their
will was ill-treated and incurred some risk of being declared
an enemy to the King. … The discontents produced by the
enormities committed by the troops of Murat gave hopes to the
court of Palermo that its fortunes might be re-established in
the kingdom beyond the Faro. Meanwhile, the civil war raged in
Calabria; nor were the Abruzzi tranquil. In these disturbances
there were various factions in arms, and various objects were
pursued: some of those who fought against Joachim, and had
fought against Joseph, were adherents of Ferdinand,—others
were the partisans of a republican constitution. … The sect
of the Carbonari arose at this period."

_C. Botta,
Italy during the Consulate and Empire of Napoleon,
chapter 5._

"The most famous, the most widely disseminated, and the most
powerful of all the secret societies which sprang up in Italy
was that of the Carbonari, or Charcoal-makers. … The
Carbonari first began to attract attention in the Kingdom of
Naples about the year 1808. A Genoese named Maghella, who
burned with hatred of the French, is said to have initiated
several Neapolitans into a secret order whose purpose it was
to goad their countrymen into rebellion. They quitted Naples,
where Murat's vigilant policy kept too strict a watch on
conspirators, and retired to the Abruzzi, where in order to
disarm suspicion they pretended to be engaged in
charcoal-burning. As their numbers increased, agents were sent
to establish lodges in the principal towns. The Bourbon king,
shut up in Sicily, soon heard of them, and as he had not
hesitated at letting loose with English aid galley-prisoners,
or at encouraging brigands, to harass Murat, so he eagerly
connived with these conspirators in the hope of recovering his
throne. Murat, having striven for several years to suppress
the Carbonari, at last, when he found his power slipping from
him, reversed his policy towards them, and strove to
conciliate them. But it was too late: neither he nor they
could prevent the restoration of the Bourbons under the
protection of Austria. The sectaries who had hitherto
foolishly expected that, if the French could be expelled,
Ferdinand would grant them a Liberal government, were soon
cured of their delusion, and they now plotted against him as
sedulously as they had plotted against his predecessor. Their
membership increased to myriads; their lodges, starting up in
every village in the Kingdom of Naples, had relations with
branch-societies in all parts of the Peninsula: to the anxious
ears of European despots the name Carbonaro soon meant all
that was lawless and terrible; it meant anarchy, chaos,
assassination. But when we read the catechism, or confession
of faith, of the Carbonari we are surprised by the
reasonableness of their aims and tenets. The duties of the
individual Carbonaro were, 'to render to the Almighty the
worship due to Him; to serve the fatherland with zeal; to
reverence religion and laws; to fulfil the obligations of
nature and friendship; to be faithful to promises; to observe
silence, discretion, and charity; to cause harmony and good
morals to prevail; to conquer the passions and submit the
will; and to abhor the seven deadly sins.' The scope of the
Society was to disseminate instruction; to unite the different
classes of society under the bond of love; to impress a
national character on the people, and to interest them in the
preservation and defense of the fatherland and of religion; to
destroy by moral culture the source of crimes due to the
general depravity of mankind; to protect the weak and to raise
up the unfortunate. … It went still farther and asserted the
un-Catholic doctrine of liberty of conscience: 'to every
Carbonaro,' so reads one of its articles, 'belongs the natural
and unalterable right to worship the Almighty according to his
own intuition and understanding.' We must not be misled,
however, by these enlightened professions, into a wrong notion
of the real purposes of Carbonarism. Politics, in spite of a
rule forbidding political discussion, were the main business,
and ethics but the incidental concern of the conspirators.
They organized their Order under republican forms as if to
prefigure the ideal towards which they aspired. The Republic
was subdivided into provinces, each of which was controlled by
a grand lodge, that of Salerno being the 'parent.' There were
also four 'Tribes,' each having a council and holding an
annual diet.
{1855}
Each tribe had a Senate, which advised a House of
Representatives, and this framed the laws which a magistracy
executed. There were courts of the first instance, of appeal,
and of cessation, and no Carbonaro might bring suit in the
civil courts against a fellow member, unless he had first
failed to get redress in one of these. … The Carbonari
borrowed some of their rites from the Freemasons, with whom
indeed they were commonly reported to be in such close
relations that Freemasons who joined the 'Carbonic Republic'
were spared the formality of initiation; other parts of their
ceremonial they copied from the New Testament, with such
additions as the special objects of the order called for."

_W. R. Thayer,
The Dawn of Italian Independence,
book 2, chapter 4 (volume 1)._

ALSO IN:
_P. Colletta,
History of the Kingdom of Naples,
book 7 (volume 2)._

_T. Frost,
Secret Societies of the European Revolution,
volume 1, chapter 5._

_General Sir H. Bunbury,
The Great War with France,
page 343, and after._

_The Chevalier O'Clery,
History of the Italian Revolution
chapter 3._

ITALY: A. D. 1809 (APRIL-MAY).
Renewed war of Austria with France.
Austrian advance and retreat.

See GERMANY: A. D. 1809 (JANUARY-JUNE).

ITALY: A. D. 1809 (MAY-JULY).
Annexation of the Papal States to the French Empire.
Removal of the Pope to Savona.
Rome declared to be a free and imperial city.

See PAPACY: A. D. 1808-1814.

ITALY: A. D. 1812.
Removal of the captive Pope to Fontainebleau.

See PAPACY: A. D. 1808-1814.

ITALY: A. D. 1812.
Participation in Napoleon's disastrous Russian campaign.

See RUSSIA: A. D. 1812 (JUNE-SEPTEMBER), and after.

ITALY: A. D. 1813.
Participation in the war in Germany.

See GERMANY: A. D. 1813 (APRIL-MAY).

ITALY: A. D. 1814.
Desertion of Napoleon by Murat.
His treaty with the Allies.
Expulsion of the French from the Peninsula.

Murat, king of Naples, "foreseeing the downfall of the
Emperor, had attempted to procure from Napoleon, as the price
of his fidelity, the union under his own sceptre of all Italy
south of the Po; but, failing in this, he prepared to abandon
the cause of his benefactor. On the 11th January, 1814, he
concluded a treaty with the Allies, by which he was guaranteed
possession of Naples; and forthwith advancing on Rome with
20,000 men, occupied the second city in his brother-in-law's
empire (January 19); having previously published a flaming
proclamation, in which the perfidy and violence of the
imperial government were denounced in terms which came
strangely from a chief of the Revolution. … At the end of
December, 1813, Eugene had withdrawn to the Adige with 36,000
men, before Bellegarde and 50,000 Austrians; and he was
already taking measures for a further retreat, when the
proclamation of Murat, and his hostile advance, rendered such
a movement inevitable. He had accordingly fallen back to the
Mincio, when, finding himself threatened on the flank by a
British expedition from Sicily under Lord William Bentinck, he
determined on again advancing against Bellegarde, so as to rid
himself of one enemy before he encountered another. The two
armies, however, thus mutually acting on the offensive, passed
each other, and an irregular action at last ensued on the
Mincio (February 8), in which the advantage was rather with
the French, who made 1,500 prisoners, and drove Bellegarde
shortly after over the Mincio, about 3,000 being killed and
wounded on each side. But, in other quarters, affairs were
going rapidly to wreck. Verona surrendered to the Austrians on
the 14th, and Ancona to Murat on the 16th; and the desertion
of the Italians, unequal to the fatigues of a winter campaign,
was so great that the Viceroy was compelled to fall back to
the Po. Fouché, meanwhile, as governor of Rome, had concluded
a convention (February 20) with the Neapolitan generals for
the evacuation of Pisa, Leghorn, Florence, and other garrisons
of the French empire in Italy. A proclamation, however, by the
hereditary prince of Sicily, who had accompanied Bentinck from
Sicily, gave Murat such umbrage that he separated his troops
from the British, and commenced operations, with little
success, against Eugene on the Po, in which the remainder of
March passed away. Bentinck, having at length received
reinforcements from Catalonia, moved forward with 12,000 men,
and occupied Spezia on the 29th of March, and, driving the
French (April 8) from their position at Sestri, forced his way
through the mountains, and appeared on the 16th in front of
Genoa. On the 17th the forts and positions before the city
were stormed; and the garrison, seeing preparations made for a
bombardment, capitulated on the 18th, on condition of being
allowed to march out with the honours of war. Murat had by
this time recommenced vigorous operations, and after driving
the French (April 13) from the Taro, had forced the passage of
the Stura; but the news of Napoleon's fall put an end to
hostilities. By a convention with the Austrians, Venice,
Palma-Nuova, and the other fortresses still held by the
French, were surrendered; the whole of Lombardy was occupied
by the Germans; and in the first week of May the French troops
finally repassed the Alps."

_Epitome of Alison's History of Europe,
sections 775, and 807-808._

ITALY: A. D. 1814-1815.
Return of the Despots.
Restoration of Austrian tyranny in the North.
The Pope in Rome again.

"With little resistance, Northern Italy was taken from the
French. Had it been otherwise, had Murat and Beauharnais
joined their forces, they might have long held the Austrians
in check, perhaps even have made a descent on Vienna; and
although this might not have hindered the ultimate overthrow
of Napoleon, yet it must have compelled the Allies, at the day
of settlement, to respect the wishes of the Italians. But
disunited, and deluded into the belief that they were partners
in a war of liberation, the Italians woke up to find that they
had escaped from the talons of the French eagle, only to be
caught in the clutch of the two-headed monstrosity of Austria.
They were to be used, in the language of Joseph De Maistre,
like coins, wherewith the Allies paid their debts. This was
plain enough when the people of the just-destroyed Kingdom of
Italy prepared to choose a ruler for themselves: one party
favored Beauharnais, another wished an Austrian prince, a
third an Italian, but all agreed in demanding independence.
Austria quickly informed them that they were her subjects, and
that their affairs would be decided at Vienna. Thus, almost
without striking a blow, and without a suspicion of the lot
awaiting them, the Northern Italians fell back under the
domination of Austria. In the spring and early summer of 1814
the exiled princelings returned: Victor Emanuel I. from his
savage refuge in Sardinia to Turin; Ferdinand III. from
Würzburg to Florence; Pius VII. from his confinement at
Fontainebleau and Savona to Rome.

See PAPACY: A. D. 1808-1814;

{1856}

Francis IV. to Modena. Other aspirants anxiously waited for
the Congress of Vienna to bestow upon them the remaining
provinces. The Congress … dragged on into the spring of the
following year. … In Lombardy and Venetia, Metternich soon
organized a thoroughly Austrian administration. The government
of the two provinces was separate, that of Lombardy being
centred at Milan, that of Venetia at Venice; but over all was
placed an Austrian archduke as Viceroy. Each district had its
civil and military tribunals, but the men who composed these
being appointees of the viceroy or his deputies, their
subservience could usually be reckoned upon. The trials were
secret, a provision which, especially in political cases, made
convictions easy. … Feudal privileges, which had been
abolished by the French, could be recovered by doing homage to
the Emperor and by paying specific taxes. In some respects
there was an improvement in the general administration, but in
others the deterioration was manifest. … Art, science, and
literature were patronized, and they throve as potted plants
thrive under the care of a gardener who cuts off every new
shoot at a certain height. … We may liken the people of the
Austro-Italian provinces to those Florentine revelers who, at
the time of the plague, tried to drive away their terror by
telling each other the merry stories reported by Boccaccio.
The plague which penetrated every corner of Lombardy and
Venetia was the Austrian police. Stealthy, but sure, its
unseen presence was dreaded in palace and hovel, in church,
tribunal, and closet. … Every police-office was crammed with
records of the daily habits of each citizen, of his visitors,
his relatives, his casual conversations,—even his style of
dress and diet were set down. … Such was the Metternichian
system of police and espionage that counteracted every mild
law and every attempt to lessen the repugnance of the
Italians. They were not to be deceived by blandishments:
Lombardy was a prison, Venetia was a prison, and they were all
captives, although they seemed to move about unshackled to
their work or pleasure."

_W. R. Thayer,
The Dawn of Italian Independence,
book 2, chapter 2 (volume 1)._

See, also,
VIENNA, THE CONGRESS OF;
AUSTRIA: A. D. 1815-1846;
and HOLY ALLIANCE.

ITALY: (Southern): A. D. 1815.
Murat's attempt to head a national movement.
His failure, downfall and death.
Restoration of the Bourbons at Naples.

"Wild as was the attempt in which, after Napoleon's return
from Elba, the King of Naples lost his crown, we must yet
judge of it both by his own character and the circumstances in
which he was placed. … In the autumn of 1813 communications
took place at Milan between Murat and the leaders of the
secret societies which were then attempting to organise
Italian patriotism in arms. In 1814, when the restoration of
Austrian rule in Lombardy so cruelly disappointed the national
hopes, these communications were renewed. The King of Naples
was assured that he needed but to raise the standard of
Italian independence to rally round him thousands and tens of
thousands of volunteers. … These calculations … were
readily adopted by the rash and vain-glorious monarch to whom
they were presented. … His proud spirit chafed and fretted
under the consciousness that he had turned upon Napoleon, and
the mortification of finding himself deserted by those in
reliance upon whose faith this sacrifice had been made. The
events in France had taken him by surprise. In joining the
alliance against Napoleon he had not calculated on the
deposition of the emperor, still less had he dreamed of the
destruction of the empire. … He bitterly reproached his own
conduct for having lent himself to such results. … When his
mind was agitated with these mingled feelings, the
intelligence reached him that Napoleon had actually left Elba,
on that enterprise in which he staked everything upon
regaining the imperial throne of France. It came to him direct
from Napoleon. … He foresaw that the armies of the allied
powers would be engaged in a gigantic struggle with the
efforts which Napoleon would be sure to make. Under such
circumstances, he fancied Italy an easy conquest; once master
of this he became a power with whom, in the conflict of
nations, any of the contending parties could only be too happy
to treat. He determined to place himself at the head of
Italian nationality, and strike one daring blow for the
chieftainship of the nation. … His ministers, his friends,
the French generals, even his queen, Napoleon's sister,
dissuaded him from such a course. … But with an obstinacy by
which the vacillating appear sometimes to attempt to atone for
habitual indecision, he persevered in spite of all advice. …
He issued a proclamation and ordered his troops to cross the
Papal frontier. … The Pope appointed a regency and retired,
accompanied by most of the cardinals, to Florence. … On the
30th of March his [Murat's] troops attacked the Austrian
forces at Cesena. The Germans were driven, without offering
much resistance, from the town. On the evening of that day he
issued from Rimini his proclamation to the Italian people,
which was against Austria a declaration of war. … A
declaration of war on the part of Austria immediately
followed. … The whole of the Italian army of Austria was
ordered at once to march upon Naples; and a treaty was
concluded with Ferdinand, by which Austria engaged to use all
her endeavours to recover for him his Neapolitan dominions.
… The army which Murat led northward, instead of numbering
80,000 as he represented in his proclamation, certainly never
exceeded 34,000. … Nearly 60,000 Austrians defended the
banks of the Po. … On the 10th of April, the troops of
Murat, under the command of General Pepe, were driven back by
the Austrians, who now in their turn advanced. … A retreat
to the frontiers of Naples was unanimously resolved on. This
retreat was one that had all the disasters without any of the
redeeming glories of war. … At last, as they approached the
confines of the Neapolitan kingdom, an engagement which took
place between Macerata and Tolentino, on the 4th of May, ended
in a total and ignominious rout. … At Macerata most of the
troops broke up into a disorganised rabble, and with
difficulty Murat led to Capua a small remnant of an army, that
could hardly be said to be defeated, because they were worsted
without anything that deserves to be called a fight.
{1857}
From Capua, on the 12th of May, the king sent to Naples a
proclamation granting a free constitution. To conceal the fact
that this was wrung from him only in distress, he resorted to
the miserable subterfuge of ante-dating it from Rimini, on the
30th of March." On the evening of the 18th of May, Murat
entered Naples quietly on foot, and had his last interview
with his queen and children. A British squadron was already in
the harbor. The next night he slipped away to the island of
Ischia, and thence to Frejus, while Queen Caroline remained to
discharge the last duties of sovereignty. On the 20th Naples
was surrendered to the Austrians, and the ex-queen took refuge
on an English vessel to escape from a threatening mob of the
lazzaroni. She was conveyed to Trieste, where the Austrian
emperor had offered her an asylum. The restored Bourbon king,
Ferdinand, made his entry into the capital on the 17th of
June. Meantime, Murat, in France, had offered his services to
Napoleon and they had been declined. After Waterloo, he
escaped to Corsica, whence, in the following October, he made
a foolhardy attempt to recover his kingdom, landing with a few
followers at Pizzo, on the Neapolitan coast, expecting a
rising of the people to welcome his return. But the rising
that occurred was hostile instead of friendly. The party was
quickly overpowered, Murat taken prisoner and delivered to
Ferdinand's officers. He was summarily tried by court martial
and shot, October 13, 1815.

_I. Butt,
History of Italy,
volume 2, chapters 10-11._

ALSO IN:
_P. Colletta,
History of Naples,
book 7, chapter 5,
and book 8, chapter 1 (volume 2)._

ITALY: A. D. 1820-1821.
Revolutionary insurrections in Naples and Sicily.
Perjury and duplicity of the king.
The revolt crushed by Austrian troops.
Abortive insurrection in Piedmont.
Its end at Novara.
Abdication of Victor Emmanuel I.
Accession of Charles Felix.