Chapter 23: Notes

Footnote 486:

See Note [443], Chapter 22.

Footnote 487:

Le Corbusier’s moulded _pilotis_ supporting the Swiss Hostel in Paris
(Plate 165B) are two years later; those under the Unité d’Habitation,
which resemble Aalto’s much more closely, were designed after the
Second World War.

Footnote 488:

A hospital built in 1926-8 by Adolf Schneck and Richard Döcker (b.
1894) in Stuttgart is actually earlier but hardly comparable in
quality.

Footnote 489:

For Howe’s earlier ‘traditional’ work see _Monograph of the Work of
Mellor, Meigs and Howe_, New York, 1923; for an assessment of his
later career, _see also_ Zevi, B., ‘George Howe’, _Journal of the
American Institute of Architects_, XXIV (1955), 176-9. For the PFSF
see Jordy, W., and Stern, R., _Journal of the Society of Architectural
Historians_, XXII (1962), entire June issue.

Footnote 490:

The same description applies roughly to Aalto’s work down to the
buildings mentioned above, it may be noted.

Footnote 491:

See Jordan, R. F., ‘Lubetkin’, _Architectural Review_, CXVIII (1955),
36-44.

Footnote 492:

Technically the architects were J. Alan Slater and Arthur Hamilton
Moberly (1885-1952) with Crabtree as designing associate. Professor
Sir Charles Herbert Reilly (1874-1948), head of the School of
Architecture at Liverpool, which he made one of the most advanced
schools in the world in these years, was consultant. It is curious to
recall that he had earlier been a consultant on Devonshire House in
Piccadilly in London, built in 1924-6 by Carrère & Hastings (John M.,
1858-1911; and Thomas, 1860-1929), when the influence of American
‘traditional’ architecture was strong in London (see Chapter 24).

Footnote 493:

Amyas Douglas Connell (b. 1901), Basil Robert Ward (b. 1902), and
Colin Anderson Lucas (b. 1906); _see also_ Note [492] to this chapter.

Footnote 494:

For the late twenties and early thirties, when the newer architecture
first penetrated England, see Pevsner, N., ‘Nine Swallows—No Summer’,
_Architectural Review_, XCI (1942), 109-12, and Hitchcock, H.-R.,
‘England and the Outside World’, _Architectural Association Journal_,
LXXII (1956), 96-7 (this is a special number of the _Journal_ devoted
to the work of Connell, Ward & Lucas, 1927-39). See also Richards, J.
M., ‘Wells Coates’, _Architectural Review_, CXXIV (1958), 357-60.

Footnote 495:

If Expressionism in architecture is an episode difficult to assess
despite the real achievement of several of the architects involved
with it (see Chapters 20 and 22), Futurism is impossible to evaluate
at all since it was only a ‘might have been’. Italian modern
architecture since the thirties does not derive from the projects of
Sant’Elia, many of which are only now being studied for the first
time. Sant’Elia and the other architects associated with Futurism
wished to cut all links with the past, Terragni re-linked the
‘International Style’—usually called _architettura razionale_ under
the Fascist regime—with Italian tradition, a line which several
Italian modern architects have followed since. See Sartoris, A.,
_Sant’Eliae l’architettura futurista_, Rome, 1943; Tentori, F., ‘Le
Origini Liberty di Antonio Sant’Elia’, _L’Architettura_, 1(1955),
206-8; Banham, R., ‘Futurism and Modern Architecture’, _Journal of the
Royal Institute of British Architects_, LXIV (1957), 129-38, and
‘Futurist Manifesto’, _Architectural Review_, CXXVI (1959), 77-80. The
greater part of Sant’Elia’s drawings are now available for study at
the Villa Olmo, Como.

Footnote 496:

See Le Corbusier, _UN Headquarters_, New York, 1947.

Footnote 497:

See Rudolph, P., ‘Walter Gropius et son école’, _L’Architecture d’
aujourd’hui_, XX (1950), 1-116.

Footnote 498:

Credit for initiating the reform at Harvard must be given to the Dean
of the school there, Joseph Hudnut (b. 1886), who invited Gropius to
join his faculty.

Footnote 499:

Louis Skidmore (1897-1962), Nathaniel Owings (b. 1903), John O.
Merrill (b. 1896).

Footnote 500:

Ralph Rapson is Dean of the School of Architecture at the University
of Minnesota, it is relevant to note at this point.

Footnote 501:

See Le Corbusier, _The Marseilles Block_, London, 1953.

Footnote 502:

See Le Corbusier, _Œuvre complète_, [VI, 1957], 50-107.

Footnote 503:

See Stirling, J., ‘Ronchamp’, _Architectural Review_, CXIX (1956),
155-61. The best coverage is in Le Corbusier, _Œuvre complète_, [VI,
1957], 16-43, however. See also Le Corbusier, _The Chapel at
Ronchamp_, New York, 1957.

Footnote 504:

In collaboration with the French architect B.-H. Zehrfuss and the
Italian engineer Pierluigi Nervi.

Footnote 505:

For a late published statement of Gropius’s principles, see _The Scope
of Total Architecture_, New York, 1955, London [1956], although there
is little there not to be found already in his other writings of the
last forty years. See also Note [482] to Chapter 22.

Footnote 506:

Curiously enough Philip Johnson’s glass house in New Canaan, Conn.,
which obviously derives in several ways from the Farnsworth house, was
actually erected first, in 1949; but of course Mies’s plan and model
of the Farnsworth house had already been published by Johnson in his
book _Mies van der Rohe_ in 1947.

Footnote 507:

Although their design follows closely that of the two blocks built in
1949-51, the construction is actually of ferro-concrete, not steel.

Footnote 508:

Thanks to the continuance in the early post-war years of the reaction
of the thirties, the buildings at the south end of the Coolsingel
appear to present a curious inversion of chronology. While Dudok’s
Bijenkorf Department Store of 1929-30, now demolished to open the view
to the harbour, was characteristic of the ambiguity of much of his
work, this ‘baby skyscraper’ of 1939-40 and also the contiguous
Exchange by J. F. Staal (1879-1940), designed in 1929 and built in the
thirties, appear much more ‘modern’ to mid-century eyes than the first
big banks and so forth rebuilt after the war—these look as if they had
been designed at least a generation ago. But the wave of reaction soon
ran its course; the Lijnbaan of 1953-4, a complete shopping street by
van den Broek & Bakema running parallel to the Coolsingel, if not the
new Bijenkorf by Breuer of 1955-7, was among the most advanced
projects carried out anywhere in the mid fifties.

Footnote 509:

Oud’s prominent Resistance Monument on the Dam in Amsterdam opposite
the Royal Palace, completed in 1956, is hardly a work of architecture
but rather an enlarged pedestal and frame for sculpture. Such a
commission and the honorary doctorate he received in 1955 from the
University of Leiden none the less indicate the high respect he was
receiving in Holland by that time.

Footnote 510:

See Note [511] to Chapter 24.

------------------------------------------------------------------------