Chapter XI: Concentration Camps

The Concentration Camp, used against the people of Germany and allied nationals, was one of the fundamental institutions of the Nazi regime. It was a pillar of the system of terror by which the Nazis consolidated their power over Germany. It was a primary weapon in the battle against the Jews, against the Christian church, against labor, against those who wanted peace, against opposition or non-conformity of any kind. It involved the systematic use of terror to achieve the cohesion within Germany which was necessary for the execution of the conspirators’ plans for aggression. It was the final link in a chain of terror and repression which involved the SS and the Gestapo and which resulted in the apprehension of victims and their confinement without trial, often without charges, generally with no indication of the length of their detention.

The SS through its espionage system tracked down the victims; the criminal police and the Gestapo seized them and brought them to the concentration camps; and the concentration camps were administered by the SS. No attempt will be made to present a complete catalogue of individual brutalities. The emphasis will rather be upon the fundamental purposes for which these camps were used, the techniques of terror which were employed, the large number of their victims, and the death and anguish which they caused.

1. THE BEGINNING OF “PROTECTIVE CUSTODY”

The Nazis realized early that without the most drastic repression of actual and potential opposition they could not consolidate their power over the German people. Immediately after Hitler became Chancellor, the conspirators promptly destroyed civil liberties by issuing the Presidential Emergency Decree of 28 February 1933 (_1390-PS_). It was this decree which was the basis for “_Schutzhaft_”, that is, “protective custody”—the power of the Gestapo to imprison people without judicial proceedings. This is made clear by a typical order for protective custody:

“_Order of Protective Custody._ Based on Article 1 of the Decree
of the Reich President for the Protection of People and State of
28 February 1933 (_Reichsgesetzblatt_ I, p. 83), you are taken
into protective custody in the interest of public security and
order.

“Reason: Suspicion of activities inimical toward the State.”
(_2499-PS_)

Goering, in a book entitled “_Aufbau Einer Nation_” and published in 1934, sought to give the impression that the camps originally were directed at those whom the Nazis considered “Communists” and “Social Democrats”. At page 89 of this book he stated:

“We had to deal ruthlessly with these enemies of the State. It
must not be forgotten that at the moment of our seizure of power
over 6 million people officially voted for Communism and about 8
million for Marxism in the Reichstag elections in March.

“Thus the concentration camps were created, to which we had to
send first thousands of functionaries of the Communist and
Social Democratic parties.” (_2324-PS_)

In practical operations, the power to order confinement was almost without limit: Frick, in an order which he issued on 25 January 1938, as Minister of Interior, made this clear. Article 1 of this order provided:

“Protective custody can be decreed as a coercive measure of the
Secret State Police against persons who endanger the security of
the people and the State through their attitude in order to
counter all aspirations of enemies of the people and State.”
(_1723-PS_)

This order further provides:

“* * * In a summary of all the previously issued decrees on the
cooperation between the Party and the Gestapo I refer to the
following and ordain:

“1. To the Gestapo has been entrusted the mission by the Fuehrer
to watch over and to eliminate all enemies of the Party and the
National Socialist State as well as all disintegrating forces of
all kinds directed against both. The successful solution of this
mission forms one of the most essential prerequisite for the
unhampered and frictionless work of the Party. The Gestapo, in
their extremely difficult task, is to be granted support and
assistance in every possible way by the NSDAP.” (_1723-PS_)

A. _Persecution of Pacifists._

The conspirators, then, were directing their apparatus of terror against the “enemies of the State”, against “disintegrating forces”, and against those people who endangered the State “with their attitudes”. Whom did they consider as belonging in these broad categories? First, they were the men in Germany who wanted peace. In this connection an affidavit by Gerhart H. Segar declares as follows:

“* * * 2. During the period after World War I up until my
commitment to the Leipzig jail and Oranienburg concentration
camp in the spring of 1933 following the Nazis’ accession to
power in January of that year, my business and political
affiliations exposed me to the full impact of the Nazi theories
and practice of violent regimentation and terroristic tactics.
My conflict with the Nazis by virtue of my identification with
the peace movement, and as duly elected member of the Reichstag
representing a political faith (Social Democratic Party) hostile
to National Socialism, clearly demonstrated that, even in the
period prior to 1933, the Nazis considered crimes and terrorism
a necessary and desirable weapon in overcoming democratic
opposition * * *”

* * * * * *

“* * * (e). That the Nazis had already conceived the device of
the concentration camp as a means of suppressing and regimenting
opposition elements was forcefully brought to my attention
during the course of a conversation which I had with Dr. Wilhelm
Frick in December 1932. Frick at that time was Chairman of the
Foreign Affairs Committee of the Reichstag of which I was a
member. When I gave an emphatic answer to Frick concerning the
particular matter discussed, he replied, ‘Don’t worry, when we
are in power we shall put all of you guys into concentration
camps.’ When the Nazis came into power, Frick was appointed
Reichminister of Interior and promptly carried out his threat in
collaboration with Goering, as Chief of the Prussian State
Police, and Himmler.” (_L-83_)

Thus, even before the Nazis had seized power in Germany they had conceived of the plan to repress any potential opposition by terror.

Frick’s statement to Gerhart Segar is completely consistent with an earlier statement which he made on 18 October 1929. Frick at that time declared:

“This fateful struggle will first be taken up with the ballot,
but this cannot continue indefinitely, for history has taught us
that in a battle, blood must be shed, and iron broken. The
ballot is the beginning of this fateful struggle. We are
determined to promulgate by force that which we preach. Just as
Mussolini exterminated the Marxists in Italy, so must we also
succeed in accomplishing the same through dictatorship and
terror.” (_2513-PS_)

There are many additional cases of the use of the concentration camp against the men who wanted peace. There was, for example, a group called the “_Bibel Forscher_” (Bible Research Workers), most of whom were Jehovah’s Witnesses. Since they were pacifists, the conspirators provided not only for their prosecution in the regular courts, but also for confining them in concentration camps after they had served the judicial sentences. An order by the Secret State Police, Berlin, dated 5 August 1937, provided:

“The Reichsminister of Justice had informed me that he does not
share the opinion voiced by subordinate departments on various
occasions, according to which, the arrest of the
_Bibelforschers_ after they have served a sentence, is supposed
to jeopardize the authority of the law courts. He is fully aware
of the necessity for measures by the State Police after the
sentence has been served. He asks, however, not to bring the
_Bibelforschers_ into protective custody under circumstances
detrimental to the respect of the law courts * * *.”

* * * * * *

“2. If information regarding the impending release of a
_Bibelforscher_ from arrest is received from the authorities
carrying out the sentence, my decision regarding the ordering of
measures by the State Police, will be asked for in accordance
with my circular decree dated 22.4.37, so that transfer to a
concentration camp can take place immediately after the sentence
has been served. Should a transfer into a concentration camp
immediately after the serving of the sentence not be possible,
_Bibelforschers_ will be detained in police prisons.” (_D-84_)

B. _Persecution of Trade Union Members._

Labor unions, traditionally opposed to wars of aggression, also felt the full force of Nazi terror. The concentration camp was an important weapon in the campaign against the trade unions. Goering made it plain, for instance, that members of the Social Democratic Party were to be confined in concentration camps (_2324-PS_). Labor leaders were largely members of that party and soon learned the meaning of “protective custody”.

In this connection, an order that one Joseph Simon should be placed in protective custody, is pertinent (_2330-PS_). The “reasons” given were as follows:

“Simon was for many years a member of the Socialist Party and
temporarily a member of the Union Socialiste Populaire. From
1907 to 1918 he was _Landtag_ deputy of the Socialist Party;
from 1908 to 1930 Social Democratic City Counsellor (_Stadtrat_)
in Nurnberg. In view of the decisive role which Simon played in
the international trade unions and in regard to his connection
with international Marxist leaders and central agencies, which
he continued after the national recovery, he was placed under
protective custody on 3 May 1933, and was kept, until 25 January
1934, in the Dachau concentration camp. Simon is under the
urgent suspicion that even after this date he played an active
part in the illegal continuation of the Socialist Party. He took
part in meetings which aimed at the illegal continuation of the
Socialist Party and propagation of illegal Marxist printed
matter in Germany.

“Through this radical attitude which is hostile to the State,
Simon directly endangers public security and order.” (_2330-PS_)

Further instances of this persecution of members of trade unions are contained in (_2334-PS_) and (_2928-PS_).

C. _Persecution of Jews._

Thousands of Jews, were, of course, confined in concentration camps. (For a fuller discussion of this point see Chapter XII.) Among the wealth of evidence showing the confinement of Germans only because they were Jews, a teletype from SS Gruppenfuehrer Heydrich is typical. This order is dated 10 November 1938, and is addressed to all headquarters of the State Police and all districts and sub-districts of the SD (_3051-PS_). Paragraph 5 of this teletype, which was entitled “Measures against Jews tonight,” provided:

“* * * 5. Inasmuch as in the course of the events of this night
the employment of officials used for this purpose would be
possible, in all districts as many Jews, especially rich ones,
are to be arrested as can be accommodated in the existing
prisons. For the time being only healthy men not too old are to
be arrested. Upon their arrest, the appropriate concentration
camps should be contacted immediately, in order to confine them
in these camps as fast as possible.” (_3051-PS_)

Himmler in 1943 indicated that use of the concentration camp against the Jews had been motivated, not simply by Nazi racialism, but also by a fear that the Jews might have been an obstacle to aggression. In a speech delivered at a meeting of the SS Major Generals at Posen on 4 October 1943, Himmler sought to justify the Nazi anti-Jewish policy:

“I mean the clearing out of the Jews, the extermination of the
Jewish race. It’s one of those things it is easy to talk
about—‘The Jewish race is being exterminated’, says one party
member, ‘that’s quite clear, it’s in our program, elimination of
the Jews, and we’re doing it, exterminating them’. And then they
come, 80 million worthy Germans, and each one has his decent
Jew. Of course, the others are vermin, but this one is an A-1
Jew. Not one of all those who talk this way has witnessed it,
not one of them has been through it. Most of you must know what
it means when 100 corpses are lying side by side, or 500 or
1,000. To have stuck it out and at the same time—apart from
exceptions caused by human weakness—to have remained decent
fellows, that is what has made us hard. This is a page of glory
in our history which has never been written and is never to be
written, for we know how difficult we should have made it for
ourselves, if—with the bombing raids, the burden and
deprivations of war—we still had Jews today in every town as
secret saboteurs, agitators and trouble-mongers.” (_1919-PS_)

It is clear from the foregoing evidence that prior to the launching of a Nazi aggression, the concentration camp had been one of the principal weapons by which the conspirators achieved the social cohesion which was needed for the execution of their plans for aggression. After the conspirators launched their aggression and their armies swept over Europe, they brought the concentration camp and the whole system of Nazi terror to occupied countries. In addition, they brought the citizens of the occupied countries to Germany and subjected them to the whole apparatus of Nazi brutality. In a communication to Himmler dated 16 December 1942, Mueller, for the Chief of the Security Police and SD, deals with the seizure of Polish Jews for deportation to concentration camps in Germany. I should like to quote the body of this communication:

“In connection with the increase in the transfer of labor to the
_concentration camps_, ordered to be completed by 30 January
1943, the following procedure may be applied in the Jewish
section.

“1. Total number: 45,000 Jews.

“2. Start of transportation: 11 January 1943; End of
transportation: 31 January 1943. (The Reich railroads are unable
to provide special trains for the evacuation during the period
from 15 December 1942 to 10 January 1943 because of the
increased traffic of armed forces leave trains).

“3. Composition: The 45,000 Jews are to consist of 30,000 Jews
from the district of _Byalystock_. 10,000 Jews from the Ghetto
_Theresienstadt_, 5,000 of whom are Jews fit for work who
heretofore had been used for smaller jobs required for the
Ghetto, and 5,000 Jews who are generally incapable of working,
also over 60 year old Jews * * *. As heretofore only such Jews
would be taken for the evacuation who do not have any particular
connections and who are not in possession of any high
decorations. 3,000 Jews from the occupied Dutch territories,
2,000 Jews from Berlin—45,000. The figure of 45,000 includes
the invalid (old Jews and children). _By use of a practical
standard_, the screening of the arriving Jews in Auschwitz
should yield at least 10,000 to 15,000 people fit for work.”
(_R-91_)

The Jews of Hungary suffered the same fate. Between 19 March 1944 and 1 August 1944 more than 400,000 Hungarian Jews were rounded up. Many of these were put in wagons and sent to extermination camps. An affidavit made in London by Dr. Rudolph Kastner, a former official of the Hungarian Zionist Organization, states in part:

“19 March 1944: Together with the German military occupation
arrived in Budapest a ‘Special Section Commando’ of the German
Secret Police with the sole object of liquidating the Hungarian
Jews * * * They arrested and later deported to Mauthausen, all
the leaders of Jewish political and business life and
journalists, together with the Hungarian democratic and
anti-Fascist politicians * * *.”

* * * * * *

“Up to 27 June 1944, 475,000 Jews were deported.”

* * * * * *

“According to statements of Krumey and Wislicseny in February or
March 1945 a conference of the officers of IV.B. was called to
Berlin by Eichmann in the spring of 1942. He then informed them
that the government decided in favor of the complete
annihilation of the European Jews and that this will be carried
out silently in the gas-chambers. ‘Victory is ours,’ declared
Eichmann. ‘The end of the war is near. We must hurry as this is
the last chance to free Europe of the Jews. After the war it
will not be possible to utilize such methods.’”

* * * * * *

“Commanders of the death-camps gassed only on direct or indirect
instructions of Eichmann. The particular officer of IV.B. who
directed the deportations from some particular country had the
authority to indicate whether the train should go to a death
camp or not, and what should happen to the passengers. The
instructions were usually carried by the SS-NCO escorting the
train. The letters ‘A’ or ‘M’ on the escorting instruction
documents indicated Auschwitz or Majdanek; it meant that the
passengers were to be gassed. * * * Regarding Hungarian Jews the
following general ruling was laid down in Auschwitz: children up
to the age of 12 or 14, older people above 50, as well as the
sick, or people with criminal records (who were transported in
specially marked wagons) were taken immediately on their arrival
to the gas chambers.

“The others passed before an SS doctor who, on sight indicated
who was fit for work, and who was not. Those unfit were sent to
the gas chambers, while the others were distributed in various
labor camps.” (_2605-PS_)

2. “CHARGES” AGAINST CONCENTRATION CAMP INMATES

In the Eastern territories, these victims were apprehended for extermination in concentration camps without any charges having been made against them. In the Western occupied territories, charges were apparently made against some of the victims. Some of the charges which the Nazis considered sufficient basis for confinement in a concentration camp are illustrated in a summary of the file of the dossier of 25 persons arrested in Luxembourg for commitment to various concentration camps and sets forth the charges made against each person (_L-215_). These charges read as follows:

“Name Charge Place of
Confinement

HENRICY— By associating with members of illegal Natzweiler
resistance movements and making money for
them violating legal foreign exchange
rates, by harming the interests of the
Reich and being expected in the future to
disobey official administrative
regulations and act as an enemy of the
Reich.

KRIER— By being responsible for advanced sabotage Buchenwald
of labor and causing fear because of his
political and criminal past. Freedom
would only further his anti-social urge.

* * * * * * * *

MONTI— By being strongly suspected of aiding Sachsenhausen
desertion.

JUNKER— Because as a relative of a deserter he is Sachsenhausen
expected to endanger the interests of the
German Reich if allowed to go free.

JAEGER— Because as a relative of a deserter he is Sachsenhausen
expected to take advantage of every
occasion to harm the German Reich.

* * * * * * * *

LUDWIG— For being strongly suspected of aiding Dachau
desertion.” (_L-215_)

3. USE OF CONCENTRATION CAMPS FOR PRISONERS OF WAR

Not only civilians of the occupied territories, but also prisoners of war were subjected to the concentration camp. A memorandum to all officers of the State Police, signed by Mueller, Chief of the Gestapo, dated 9 November 1941, discusses the “Transportation of Russian Prisoners of War, Destined for Execution, into the Concentration Camps.” (_1165-PS_). This memorandum states in part:

“The commandants of the concentration camps are complaining that
5 to 10% of the Soviet Russians destined for execution are
arriving in the camps dead or half dead. Therefore the
impression has arisen that the Stalags are getting rid of such
prisoners in this way.

“It was particularly noted that, when marching, for example,
from the railroad station to the camp, a rather large number of
PWs collapsed on the way from exhaustion, either dead or half
dead, and had to be picked up by a truck following the convoy.

“It cannot be prevented that the German people take notice of
these occurrences.

“Even if the transportation to the camps is generally taken care
of by the Wehrmacht, the population will attribute this
situation to the SS.

“In order to prevent, if possible, similar occurrences in the
future, I therefore order that, effective from today on, Soviet
Russians, declared definitely suspect and obviously marked by
death (for example with typhus) and who therefore would not be
able to withstand the exertions of even a short march on foot,
shall in the future, as a matter of basic principle, be excluded
from the transport into the concentration camps for execution.”
(_1165-PS_)

Additional evidence of the confinement of Russian prisoners of war in concentration camps is found in an official report of the investigation of the Flossenburg concentration camp by Headquarters Third United States Army, Judge Advocate Section, War Crimes Branch, dated 21 June 1945 (_2309-PS_). This report states:

“In 1941 an additional stockade was added at the Flossenburg
Camp, to hold 2,000 Russian prisoners. From these 2,000
prisoners only 102 survived.” (_2309-PS_)

Soviet prisoners of war found their allies in the concentration camps. The same official report continues:

“The victims of Flossenburg included among the Russian,
civilians and prisoners of war, German nationals, Italians,
Belgians, Poles, Czechs, Hungarians, British and American
prisoners of war. No practical means was available to complete a
list of victims of this camp, however, since the foundation of
the camp in 1938 until the day of liberation it is estimated
that more than 29,000 inmates died.” (_2309-PS_)

Escaped prisoners of war were sent to concentration camps, which were specially set up as extermination centers. A communication from the Secret State Police Office, Cologne, dated 4 March 1944, transmitted the following orders of the OKW—for which Keitel is responsible—concerning escaped prisoners of war:

“1. Every captured escaped prisoner of war who is an officer or
a non-working non-commissioned officer, except British and
American prisoners of war, is to be turned over to the Chief of
the Security Police and of the Security Service under the
classification ‘Step III’ regardless of whether the escape
occurred during a transport, whether it was a mass escape or an
individual one.

“2. Since the transfer of the prisoners of war to the Security
Police and Security Service may not become officially known to
the outside under any circumstances other prisoners of war may
by no means be informed of the capture. The captured prisoners
are to be reported to the Army Information Bureau as ‘escaped
and not captured’. Their mail is to be handled accordingly.
Inquiries of representatives of the Protective Power of the
International Red Cross, and of other aid societies will be
given the same answer.” (_1650-PS_)

The same communication carried a copy of an order of SS General Mueller, acting for the Chief of the Security Police and SD, which directed the Gestapo to transport escaped prisoners directly to Mauthausen. The first two paragraphs of Mueller’s order provide:

“The State Police Directorates will accept the captured escaped
officer prisoners of war from the prisoner of war camp
commandants and will transport them to the Concentration Camp
Mauthausen following the procedure previously used, unless the
circumstances render a special transport imperative. The
prisoners of war are to be put in irons on the transport—not on
the station if it is subject to view by the public. The camp
commandant at Mauthausen is to be notified that the transfer
occurs within the scope of the action ‘Kugel’. The State Police
Directorates will submit semi-yearly reports on these transfers
giving merely the figures, the first report being due on 5 July
1944 (sharp). * * * For the sake of secrecy, the Supreme Command
of the Armed Forces has been requested to inform the prisoner of
war camps to turn the captured prisoners over to the local State
Police Office and not to send them directly to Mauthausen.”
(_1650-PS_)

It is no coincidence that the literal translation for the German word “_Kugel_” is “bullet”, since Mauthausen, where the escaped prisoners were sent, was an extermination center.

4. THE NETWORK OF CONCENTRATION CAMPS

Nazi conquest was marked by the establishment of concentration camps over all of Europe. The following report on the location of concentration camps, signed by Pohl, an SS General who was in charge of concentration camp labor policies, indicates the scope of these activities:

“1. At the outbreak of war there existed the following
concentration camps:

a Dachau, 1939, 4,000 prisoners, today 8,000.

b Sachsenhausen, 1939, 6,500 prisoners, today 10,000.

c Buchenwald, 1939, 5,300 prisoners, today 9,000.

d Mauthausen, 1939, 1,500 prisoners, today 5,500.

e Flossenburg, 1939, 1,600 prisoners, today 4,700.

f Ravensbrueck, 1939, 2,500 prisoners, today 7,500.

“2. In the years 1940 to 1942 nine further camps were erected,
viz.:

a. Auschwitz (Poland)

b. Neuengamme

c. Gusen (Austria)

d. Natzweiler (France)

e. Gross-Rosen

f. Lublin (Poland)

g. Niederhagen

h. Stutthof (near Danzig)

i. Arbeitsdorf.” (_R-129_)

In addition to these camps in occupied territory, there were many others. The official report by the Headquarters, Third U. S. Army, Judge Advocate Section, War Crimes Branch, contains the following evidence:

“Concentration Camp Flossenburg was founded in 1938 as a camp
for political prisoners. Construction was commenced on the camp
in 1938 and it was not until April 1940 that the first transport
of prisoners was received. From this time on prisoners began to
flow steadily into the camp. * * * Flossenburg was the mother
camp and under its direct control and jurisdiction were 47
satellite camps or outer-commandos for male prisoners and 27
camps for female workers. To these outer-commandos were supplied
the necessary prisoners for the various work projects
undertaken.

“Of all these outer-commandos Hersbruck and Leitmeritz (in
Czechoslovakia), Oberstaubling, Mulsen and Sall, located on the
Danube, were considered to be the worst.” (_2309-PS_)

5. THE CONCENTRATION CAMP AS AN INSTRUMENT OF TERROR

The savage treatment which was inflicted in these concentration camps upon allied nationals, prisoners of war, and other victims of Nazi terror has been depicted in motion picture evidence. Verbal discussion of this subject may therefore be brief.

The minutes of the Central Planning Committee, on which Speer sat, and where the high strategy of Nazi armament production was formulated, record a conference on the question of squeezing more work out of slave laborers. Speer, who was not generally considered a fanatic like Frick, or a man of Blood and Iron like Goering, handled the problem in this fashion:

“Speer: We must also discuss the slackers. Ley has ascertained
that the sick list decreased to one-fourth or one-fifth in
factories where doctors are on the staff who are examining the
sick men. There is nothing to be said against SS and Police
taking drastic steps and putting those known as slackers into
concentration camps. There is no alternative. Let it happen
several times and the news will soon go around.” (_R-124_)

The deterrent effect of the concentration camps upon the public was carefully planned. To heighten the atmosphere of terror surrounding the concentration camps, they were shrouded in secrecy. What went on behind the barbed wire enclosures was a matter of fearful conjecture in Germany and the countries under Nazi control.

This was the policy from the very beginning, when the Nazis first came into power in Germany and set up their concentration camp system. An order issued in 1 October 1933 by the Camp Commander of Dachau prescribes a program of floggings, solitary confinement, and executions for the inmates for infractions of the rules. (_778-PS_) Among the rules were those prescribing a rigid censorship concerning conditions within the camp:

“By virture of the law on revolutionaries, the following
offenders, considered as _agitators, will be hung_. Anyone who,
for the purpose of agitating, does the following in the camp, at
work, in the quarters, in the kitchens and workshops, toilets
and places of rest: politicizes, holds inciting speeches and
meetings, forms cliques, loiters around with others; who for the
purpose of supplying the propaganda of the opposition with
atrocity stories, collects true or false information about the
concentration camp and its institution; receives such
information, buries it, talks about it to others, smuggles it
out of the camp into the hands of foreign visitors or others by
means of clandestine or other methods, passes it on in writing
or orally to released prisoners or prisoners who are placed
above them, conceals it in clothing or other articles, throws
stones and other objects over the camp wall containing such
information; or produces secret documents; who, for the purpose
of agitating, climbs on barracks’ roofs and trees, seeks contact
with the outside by giving light or other signals, or induces
others to escape or commit a crime, gives them advices to that
effect or supports such undertakings in any way whatsover.”
(_778-PS_)

Censorship concerning the camps was complemented by an officially inspired rumor campaign outside the camps. Concentration camps were spoken of in whispers, and the whispers were spread by agents of the secret police. A “Top Secret” order, relating to concentration camps, issued by the Head of the Gestapo and distributed to appropriate police officers, and dated 26 October 1939, provides:

“In order to achieve a further deterrent effect, the following
must, in future, be observed in each individual case * * *

“3. _The length of the period of custody must in no case be made
known_, even if the Reichsfuehrer SS and Chief of the German
Police or the Chief of the Security Police and the SD has
already fixed it.

“The term of commitment to a concentration camp is to be openly
announced as ‘until further notice.’

“In most serious cases, there is no objection to the increasing
of the deterrent effect by the spreading of cleverly carried out
_rumour propaganda_, more or less to the effect that, according
to hearsay, in view of the seriousness of his case, the arrested
man will not be released for 2 or 3 years.

“4. In certain cases, the Reichsfuehrer SS and Chief of the
German Police will order flogging in addition to detention in a
concentration camp. Orders of this kind will, in future, also be
transmitted to the State Police District Office concerned. In
this case too, there is no objection to spreading the rumor of
this increased punishment as laid down in Section 3, paragraph
3, in so far as this appears suitable, to add to the deterrent
effect.

“5. Naturally, particularly suitable and reliable people are to
be chosen for the spreading of such news.” (_1531-PS_)

6. THE TREATMENT OF CONCENTRATION CAMP VICTIMS

The deterrent effect of the concentration camps was based on the promise of savage brutality. This promise was fulfilled, to an extent which defies description. Once in the custody of the SS guards, the victim was beaten, tortured, starved, and often murdered through the so-called “extermination through work” program, or through mass execution gas chambers and furnaces of the camps (which were portrayed in the motion picture evidence). The reports of official government investigations furnish additional evidence of conditions within the concentration camps. The official report concerning the concentration camp Flossenberg, prefaced by the Office of the Judge Advocate General of the United States Army, dated 21 June 1945, and supported by attached affidavits and testimony, contains this description:

“The work at these camps mainly consisted of underground labor,
the purpose being the construction of large underground
factories, storage rooms, etc. This labor was performed
completely underground and as a result of the brutal treatment,
working and living conditions, a daily average of 100 prisoners
died. To the one camp Oberstaubling, 700 prisoners were
transported in February 1945 and on the 15th of April 1945 only
405 of these men were living. During the 12 months preceding the
liberation, Flossenburg and the branch camps under its control
accounted for the death of 14,739 male inmates and 1,300 women.
These figures represent the deaths as were obtained from the
available records in the camp, however, they are in no way
complete as many secret mass executions and deaths took place.
In 1941 an additional stockade was added at the Flossenburg
camp, to hold 2,000 Russian prisoners. From these 2,000
prisoners only 102 survived.

“Flossenburg Concentration Camp can best be described as a
factory dealing in death. Although this camp had in view the
primary object of putting to work the mass slave labor, another
of its primary objectives was the elimination of human lives by
the methods employed in handling the prisoners.

“Hunger and starvation rations, sadism, housing facilities,
inadequate clothing, medical neglect, disease, beatings,
hangings, freezing, hand hanging, forced suicides, shooting, all
played a major role in obtaining their objective. Prisoners were
murdered at random; spite killings against Jews were common.
Injections of poison and shooting in the neck were everyday
occurrences. Epidemics of typhus and spotted fever were
permitted to run rampant as a means of eliminating prisoners.
Life in this camp meant nothing. Killing became a common thing,
so common that a quick death was welcomed by the unfortunate
ones.”

* * * * * *

“On Christmas 1944 a number of prisoners were hung at one time.
The prisoners were forced to view this hanging. By the side of
the gallows was a decorated Christmas tree and as expressed by
one prisoner ‘it was a terrible sight, that combination of
prisoners hanging in the air and the glistening Christmas tree’.

“In March or April, 13 American or British parachutists were
hung. They had been delivered to this camp sometime before and
had been captured while trying to blow up bridges.”

* * * * * *

“On April 20, 1945, approximately 15,000 prisoners were
assembled to make a forced march in the direction of
Concentration Camp Dachau. The evacuation of these prisoners was
caused by the impending capture of the camp by the Allies. These
15,000 prisoners were lined up in three groups and started on
this march. Only those prisoners who could walk were taken and
before leaving Flossenburg, many were executed, as also were
those who collapsed in rank awaiting the movement to start the
trek. No provision was made for the feeding of these prisoners
or sleeping on this trip. They marched in long columns guarded
by SS Guards.

“Thousands were killed on the way and the paths which they took
were littered with the dead. Groups of from 5 to 50 were taken
out and forced to dig pits and then were shot. Many graves were
not even covered. As the already starved and weakened prisoners
fell from exhaustion, a group of SS guards bringing up the rear
would kill them by a shot in the back of the head. All who fell
out of line were immediately executed in this manner. Death was
also caused by beatings or bashings in the skulls.

“The prisoners marched from Friday till Monday during which time
they received only 100 grams of bread. They marched in the rain
and slept in the fields in the mud and water. Many died from
exhaustion. On the 23rd day of April 1945, between the towns of
Cham and Roding, they were liberated by the American troops.”
(_2309-PS_)

Conditions at Mauthausen, one of the most notorious extermination centers, are thus described in an official report of the office of the Judge Advocate General of the Third United States Army, dated 17 June 1945:

“V. _Conclusions._ There is no doubt that Mauthausen was the
basis for long term planning. It was constructed as a gigantic
stone fortress on top of a mountain flanked by small barracks.

“Mauthausen, in addition to its permanency of construction had
facilities for a large garrison of officers and men, and had
large dining rooms and toilet facilities for the staff. It was
conducted with the sole purpose in mind of exterminating any
so-called prisoner who entered within its walls. The so-called
branches of Mauthausen were under direct command of the SS
officials located there. All records, orders, and administrative
facilities were handled for these branches through Mauthausen.
The other camps, including Gusen and Ebensee, its two most
notorious and largest branches, were not exclusively used for
extermination but prisoners were used as tools in construction
and production until they were beaten or starved into
uselessness, whereupon they were customarily sent to Mauthausen
for final disposal.” (_2176-PS_)

It is clear from both the motion picture and these reports, which could be supplemented by many similar ones, that the brutal conditions in all concentration camps followed the same general pattern. The widespread incidence of these conditions makes it clear that they were not the result of sporadic excesses on the part of individual jailers, but were the result of policies deliberately imposed from above.

The crimes committed by the Nazis in the concentration camp were on so vast a scale that individual atrocities pale into insignificance. But there are two exhibits in the possession of the prosecution which illustrate the contempt in which the Nazis held human values. The first is a frame showing sections of human skin, taken from human bodies in Buchenwald Concentration Camp and preserved as ornaments. (This was offered by the prosecution as a physical exhibit.) They were selected because of the tattooing which appeared on the skin. Attached to this exhibit is an extract of an official U. S. Army report describing the circumstances under which this exhibit was obtained (_3420-PS_):

“Mobile Field Interrogation Unit No. 2

PW INTELLIGENCE BULLETIN

“No. 2/20

19 December 1944
“Address Briefs and Requests to HQ, FID, MIS, APO 887
“_EXTRACT_

“13. _Concentration Camp, Buchenwald._

“_Preamble._ The author of this account is PW Andreas
Pfaffenberger, 1 Coy, 9 Landesschuetzen Bn. 43 years old and of
limited education, he is a butcher by trade. The substantial
agreement of the details of his story with those found in PWIS
(H)/LF/736 establishes the validity of his testimony.

“PW has not been questioned on statements which, in the light of
what is known, are apparently erroneous in certain details, nor
has any effort been made to alter the subjective character of
PW’s account, which he wrote without being told anything of the
intelligence already known. Results of interrogation on
personalities at Buchenwald have already been published (PWIB No
2/12 Item 31).”

* * * * * *

“In 1939, all prisoners with tattooing on them were ordered to
report to the dispensary. No one knew what the purpose was. But
after the tattooed prisoners had been examined, the ones with
the best and most artistic specimens were kept in the
dispensary, and then killed by injections, administered by Karl
Beigs, a criminal prisoner. The corpses were then turned over to
the pathological department, where the desired pieces of
tattooed skin were detached from the bodies and treated. The
finished products were turned over to SS Standartenfuehrer
Koch’s wife, who had them fashioned into lampshades and other
ornamental household articles. I myself saw such tattooed skins
with various designs and legends on them, such as “Hans’l und
Gret’l”, which one prisoner had had on his knee, and ships from
prisoners’ chests. This work was done by a prisoner named
Wernerbach.” (_3420-PS_)

The following certificate is also attached to the exhibit:

“I, George C. Demas, Lieut., USNR., associated with the United
States Chief of Counsel for the Prosecution of Axis Criminality,
hereby certify that the attached exhibit, consisting of
parchment, was delivered by the War Crimes Section, Judge
Advocate General, U. S. Army, to me in my above capacity, in the
usual course of official business, as an exhibit found in
Buchenwald Camp and captured by military forces under the
command of the Supreme Commander, Allied Expeditionary Forces.”
(_3421-PS_)

This is the conclusion reached in an official U. S. Army report attached to the exhibit:

“Based on the findings in paragraph 2, all three specimens are
tattooed human skin”. (_3423-PS_)

One more example of this pathological phase of Nazi culture, another Nazi trophy, is a human head with the skull bone removed, shrunken, stuffed, and preserved. (This was offered by the prosecution as a physical exhibit.) This head probably belonged to a foreign worker, kidnapped by Sauckel to work in Speer’s armament industry. The Nazis had one of their many victims decapitated after having had him hanged for fraternizing with a German woman; they fashioned this ornament from his head. This represents the end product of the Nazi system, representing both the degradation of the Nazi “master” and the anguish of his victim. The official U. S. Army report attached to this exhibit deals with the manner in which this exhibit was acquired. It reads in part:

“There I also saw the shrunken heads of two young Poles who had
been hanged for having relations with German girls. The heads
were the size of a fist, and the hair and the marks of the rope
were still there.” (_3423-PS_)

7. THE NUMBER OF VICTIMS

No accurate estimate of how many persons died in the concentration camps can be made. Although the Nazis were generally meticulous record keepers, the records they kept about concentration camps appear to have been incomplete.

Occasionally there is a death book, or a set of index cards, but for the most part, the victims apparently faded into an unrecorded death. The scale of the concentration camp operations is suggested by a set of seven books, the death ledger of the Mauthausen Concentration Camp (physically offered to the court). Each book bears on its cover “_Totenbuch_” or Death Book—Mauthausen. In these books were recorded the names of some of the inmates who died or were murdered in this camp. The books cover the period from January 1939 to April 1945. They give the name, place of birth, the assigned cause of death and time of death of each individual recorded. In addition each corpse is assigned a serial number. Addition of the serial numbers for the five-year period produces a total figure of 35,318.

Examination of the books reveals the camp’s routine of death. For example, pages 568 to 582 of Volume 5 cover death entries made for 19 March 1945 between fifteen minutes past one in the morning until 2 o’clock in the afternoon. In this space of 12¾ hours, 203 persons are reported as having died. They were assigned serial numbers running from 8390 to 8593. The names of the dead are listed. The victims are all recorded as having died of the same ailment—“heart trouble”. They died at brief intervals. They died in alphabetical order. The first who died was a man named Ackermann who died at one fifteen A.M. The last was a man named Zynger who died at 2 o’clock P.M.

At twenty minutes past two o’clock on the afternoon of the same day, 19 March 1945, the fatal roll call began again, and continued until half past four o’clock. In a space of two hours, 75 more persons died. Once again they died from heart failure and in alphabetical order. The entries are recorded in the same volume, from pages 582 through 586.

Another death book was found at Camp Mauthausen. This is a single volume, which has on its cover the words—“Death Book—Prisoners of War”. Pages 234 through 246 contain entries recording the names of 208 prisoners of war, apparently Russians, who at 15 minutes past midnight on the 10th day of May 1942, were executed at the same time. The book notes that the execution was directed by the Chief of the SD and the SIPO (Heydrich).

It is common knowledge that the anguish of the concentration camp was spread, not only over the Continent of Europe, but over all the world. Even today all over the world people are still seeking word of their friends and relatives who vanished into the Nazi concentration camps and left no trace behind. This fact is emphasized by the 23 November 1945 issue of the weekly newspaper, “_Aufbau_”, published in the German language in New York City. On the back pages—8, 9, 10, and 11—are published both notices requesting information about friends and relatives, and notices announcing the deaths of persons who were last heard of in a Nazi concentration camp. The personal tragedies, which these notices represent, multiplied an incalculable number of times, is part of the legacy which the Nazi conspirators have left to the world.

* * * * *

LEGAL REFERENCES AND LIST OF DOCUMENTS RELATING TO CONCENTRATION CAMPS

Document │ Description │ Vol. │ Page
│ │ │
│Charter of the International Military │ │
│ Tribunal, Article 6 (b, c). │ I │ 5
│ │ │
│International Military Tribunal, │ │
│ Indictment Number 1, Sections III; │ │ 15, 31,
│ VIII (A, C); X. │ I │ 41, 53
│ │ │
3737-PS │Hague Convention of 1907 respecting the │ │
│ Laws and Customs of War on Land, │ │
│ Annex, Article 46. │ VI │ 597
│ │ │
3738-PS │Geneva Convention of 1929 relative to │ │
│ treatment of Prisoners of War, │ │
│ Articles 2, 3. │ VI │ 600
│ ————— │ │
│Note: A single asterisk (*) before a │ │
│document indicates that the document was│ │
│received in evidence at the Nurnberg │ │
│trial. A double asterisk (**) before a │ │
│document number indicates that the │ │
│document was referred to during the │ │
│trial but was not formally received in │ │
│evidence, for the reason given in │ │
│parentheses following the description of│ │
│the document. The USA series number, │ │
│given in parentheses following the │ │
│description of the document, is the │ │
│official exhibit number assigned by the │ │
│court. │ │
│ ————— │ │
*374-PS │TWX Series of Orders signed by Heydrich │ │
│and Mueller, issued by Gestapo │ │
│Headquarters Berlin, 9-11 November 1938,│ │
│concerning treatment of Jews. (USA 729) │ III │ 277
│ │ │
*392-PS │Official NSDAP circular entitled “The │ │
│Social Life of New Germany with Special │ │
│Consideration of the German Labor │ │
│Front”, by Prof. Willy Mueller (Berlin, │ │
│1938). (USA 326) │ III │ 380
│ │ │
*641-PS │Report of Public Prosecutor General in │ │
│Munich, 1 June 1933, concerning murder │ │
│of Dr. Strauss in Dachau by an SS guard.│ │
│(USA 450) │ III │ 453
│ │ │
*642-PS │Report to Public Prosecutor General in │ │
│Munich, 1 June 1933, concerning murder │ │
│of Hausmann in Dachau by an SS guard. │ │
│(USA 451) │ III │ 454
│ │ │
*644-PS │Report to Public Prosecutor General in │ │
│Munich, 1 June 1933, concerning murder │ │
│of Schloss in Dachau by an SS guard. │ │
│(USA 452) │ III │ 455
│ │ │
*645-PS │Report to Public Prosecutor General in │ │
│Munich, 1 June 1933, concerning murder │ │
│of Nefzger in Dachau by an SS guard. │ │
│(USA 453) │ III │ 457
│ │ │
*778-PS │Disciplinary and Penal Measures for │ │
│Concentration Camp Dachau and Service │ │
│Regulations for the Camp Personnel, │ │
│signed by Eicke, 1 October 1933. (USA │ │
│247) │ III │ 550
│ │ │
833-PS │Instructions by Admiral Canaris, Head of│ │
│the Abwehr, 2 February 1942, concerning │ │
│prosecution of crimes against the Reich │ │
│or occupying forces in the occupied │ │
│territories. │ III │ 600
│ │ │
*1063-A-PS │Order of Chief of SIPO and SD, 2 January│ │
│1941, concerning classification of │ │
│concentration camps. (USA 492) │ III │ 775
│ │ │
*1063-B-PS │Letter signed by Kaltenbrunner, 26 July │ │
│1943, concerning establishment of Labor │ │
│Reformatory camps. (USA 492) │ III │ 777
│ │ │
*1063-D-PS │Mueller’s order, 17 December 1942, │ │
│concerning prisoners qualified for work │ │
│to be sent to concentration camps. (USA │ │
│219) │ III │ 778
│ │ │
1063-E-PS │Copy of Mueller’s order, 25 June 1942, │ │
│concerning increased shipments to │ │
│concentration camps. │ III │ 780
│ │ │
1151-P-PS │Letter from WVHA, 28 March 1942, │ │
│concerning “Action 14 F 13” from files │ │
│of Gross Rosen Concentration camp. │ III │ 808
│ │ │
*1165-PS │Letter from Commandant of concentration │ │
│Camp Gross Rosen, 23 October 1941, and │ │
│letter of Mueller to all Gestapo │ │
│offices, 9 November 1941, concerning │ │
│execution of Russian PWs. (USA 244) │ III │ 821
│ │ │
*1166-PS │Interoffice memorandum of WVHA, 15 │ │
│August 1944, concerning number of │ │
│prisoners and survey of prisoners’ │ │
│clothing. (USA 458) │ III │ 824
│ │ │
1216-PS │Typewritten memorandum, “Important │ │
│Incidents in Concentration camp Dachau”.│ III │ 846
│ │ │
1390-PS │Decree of the Reich President for the │ │
│Protection of the People and State, 28 │ │
│February 1933. 1933 Reichsgesetzblatt, │ │
│Part I, p. 83. │ III │ 968
│ │ │
*1531-PS │Directive from RSHA, 26 October 1939, │ │
│concerning execution of protective │ │
│custody, and directive, 12 June 1942, │ │
│concerning third degree. (USA 248) │ IV │ 93
│ │ │
*1584-I-PS │Teletype from Goering to Himmler, 14 │ │
│February 1944, concerning formation of │ │
│7th Airforce Group squadron for special │ │
│purposes. (USA 221) │ IV │ 117
│ │ │
*1584-III-PS │Correspondence between Himmler and │ │
│Goering, 9 March 1944, concerning use of│ │
│concentration camp inmates in aircraft │ │
│industry. (USA 457) │ IV │ 118
│ │ │
1616-PS │Letter from Dr. Rascher to Himmler, 17 │ │
│February 1943, concerning freezing │ │
│experiments. │ IV │ 133
│ │ │
*1650-PS │Directive to State Police Directorates │ │
│from Chief of SIPO and SD by Mueller, 4 │ │
│March 1944, concerning captured escaped │ │
│PWs except British and American PWs. │ │
│(USA 246) │ IV │ 158
│ │ │
*1723-PS │Order concerning cooperation of Party │ │
│offices with the Secret State Police, 25│ │
│January 1938, published in Decrees, │ │
│Regulations, Announcements, 1937, Vol. │ │
│II, pp. 430-439. (USA 206) │ IV │ 219
│ │ │
*1919-PS │Himmler’s speech to SS Gruppenfuehrers, │ │
│4 October 1943. (USA 170) │ IV │ 558
│ │ │
1956-PS │Meaning and Tasks of the Secret State │ │
│Police, published in The Archives, │ │
│January 1936, Vol. 22-24, p. 1342. │ IV │ 598
│ │ │
2107-PS │Law on Secret State Police of 10 │ │
│February 1936. 1936 Preussische │ │
│Gesetzsammlung, pp. 21-22. │ IV │ 732
│ │ │
2108-PS │Decree for execution of Law on Secret │ │
│State Police of 10 February 1936. 1936 │ │
│Preussische Gesetzsammlung, pp. 22-24. │ IV │ 732
│ │ │
2169-PS │Quarterly report of the SS medical │ │
│officer of Hmb. Neuengamme concentration│ │
│camp, 29 March 1945. │ IV │ 799
│ │ │
2171-PS │U. S. Government report B-2833 on │ │
│Numerical Expansion of Buchenwald │ │
│Concentration Camp, during years │ │
│1937-1945. │ IV │ 800
│ │ │
*2176-PS │Report on Mauthausen concentration camp,│ │
│by investigating officer, Office of │ │
│Judge Advocate, Third U. S. Army, 17 │ │
│June 1945. (USA 249). │ IV │ 836
│ │ │
2187-PS │Order from Main SS economic │ │
│administration office, 14 July 1943, │ │
│concerning beating of female prisoners. │ IV │ 842
│ │ │
*2189-PS │Orders from Department D of Economic and│ │
│Administrative Main Office, 11 August │ │
│1942, concerning punishment by beating. │ │
│(USA 460) │ IV │ 842
│ │ │
2222-PS │Report of investigation of Buchenwald │ │
│Concentration Camp, by Judge Advocate │ │
│Section, Third United States Army, 25 │ │
│May 1945. │ IV │ 860
│ │ │
*2285-PS │Affidavit, 13 May 1945, by two French │ │
│officers, about shooting of prisoners at│ │
│Mauthausen. (USA 490) │ IV │ 991
│ │ │
*2309-PS │Report by Headquarters Third United │ │
│States Army, 21 June 1945, concerning │ │
│Flossenburg Concentration Camp. (USA │ │
│245) │ IV │ 999
│ │ │
*2324-PS │Extracts from Reconstruction of a │ │
│Nation, by Hermann Goering, 1934. (USA │ │
│233) │ IV │ 1033
│ │ │
*2330-PS │Order of Protective Custody, Police │ │
│Directorate of Nurnberg-Fuerth of Josef │ │
│Simon, Chairman of German Shoemaker’s │ │
│Union, 29 August 1935. (USA 237) │ IV │ 1038
│ │ │
*2334-PS │Affidavits of Lorenz Hagen, Chairman of │ │
│Local Committee, German Trade Unions, │ │
│Nurnberg. (USA 238) │ IV │ 1041
│ │ │
2344-PS │Reconstruction of a Nation by Goering, │ │
│1934, p. 89. │ IV │ 1065
│ │ │
2347-PS │Court decisions from 1935 │ │
│Reichsverwaltungsblatt, Vol. 56, pp. │ │
│577-578, 20 July 1935. │ IV │ 1066
│ │ │
2476-PS │Affidavit of Josef Buehler, 4 November │ │
│1945. │ V │ 228
│ │ │
*2477-PS │Affidavit of Willy Litzenberg, 4 │ │
│November 1945. (USA 518) │ V │ 229
│ │ │
2478-PS │Affidavit of Willy Litzenberg, 4 │ │
│November 1945. │ V │ 230
│ │ │
*2499-PS │Original Protective Custody Order served│ │
│on Dr. R. Kempner, 15 March 1935. (USA │ │
│232) │ V │ 236
│ │ │
*2513-PS │Extract from The National Socialist │ │
│Workers’ Party as an Association Hostile│ │
│to State and to Republican Form of │ │
│Government and Guilty of Treasonable │ │
│Activity. (USA 235) │ V │ 252
│ │ │
2533-PS │Extract from article “Legislation and │ │
│Judiciary in Third Reich”, from Journal │ │
│of the Academy for German Law, 1936, pp.│ │
│141-142. │ V │ 277
│ │ │
*2605-PS │Affidavit of Dr. Rudolf Kastner, former │ │
│President of the Hungarian Zionist │ │
│Organization, 13 September 1945. (USA │ │
│242) │ V │ 313
│ │ │
2615-PS │Affidavit of Dr. Wilhelm Hoettl, 5 │ │
│November 1945. │ V │ 338
│ │ │
2655-PS │Concordat between the Holy See and the │ │
│German Reich, Article 31. 1933 │ │
│Reichsgesetzblatt, Part II, p. 679, │ │
│687-8. │ V │ 364
│ │ │
*2663-PS │Hitler’s speech to the Reichstag, 30 │ │
│January 1939, quoted from Voelkischer │ │
│Beobachter, Munich edition, 1 February │ │
│1939. (USA 268) │ V │ 367
│ │ │
*2745-PS │Order for commitment to concentration │ │
│camp, 7 July 1943, Kaltenbrunner’s │ │
│signature. (USA 519) │ V │ 383
│ │ │
*2753-PS │Affidavit of Alois Hoellriegl, 7 │ │
│November 1945. (USA 515) │ V │ 393
│ │ │
*2928-PS │Affidavit of Mathias Lex, deputy │ │
│president of the German Shoemakers │ │
│Union. (USA 239) │ V │ 594
│ │ │
*3051-PS │Three teletype orders from Heydrich to │ │
│all stations of State Police, 10 │ │
│November 1938, on measures against Jews,│ │
│and one order from Heydrich on │ │
│termination of protest actions. (USA │ │
│240) │ V │ 797
│ │ │
*3249-PS │Affidavit of Dr. Franz Blaha, 24 │ │
│November 1945. (USA 663) │ V │ 949
│ │ │
*3420-PS │U. S. Army report on human skin exhibits│ │
│at Buchenwald Concentration Camp. (USA │ │
│252) │ VI │ 122
│ │ │
*3421-PS │Certificate accompanying human skin │ │
│exhibit. (USA 253) │ VI │ 123
│ │ │
*3423-PS │U. S. Army report on identification of │ │
│tattooed human skins. (USA 252) │ VI │ 123
│ │ │
*3590-PS │Charges and findings against Weiss and │ │
│others tried by U. S. Military Court at │ │
│Dachau. (USA 664) │ VI │ 288
│ │ │
*3601-PS │Affidavit of Sidney Mendel, 28 December │ │
│1945, concerning the connection of │ │
│Frick’s Ministry of Interior with │ │
│concentration camps. (GB 324) │ VI │ 313
│ │ │
*3751-PS │Diary of the German Minister of Justice,│ │
│1935 concerning prosecution of church │ │
│officials and punishment in │ │
│concentration camps. (USA 828; USA 858) │ VI │ 636
│ │ │
*3762-PS │Affidavit of SS Colonel Kurt Becher, 8 │ │
│March 1946, concerning the │ │
│responsibility of Kaltenbrunner for │ │
│concentration camp executions. (USA 798)│ VI │ 645
│ │ │
*3844-PS │Statement of Josef Niedermayer, 7 March │ │
│1946, concerning Kaltenbrunner’s part in│ │
│“bullet” orders at Mauthausen │ │
│concentration camp. (USA 801) │ VI │ 782
│ │ │
*3846-PS │Interrogation of Johann Kanduth, 30 │ │
│November 1945, concerning crematorium at│ │
│Mauthausen and the activities of │ │
│Kaltenbrunner there. (USA 796) │ VI │ 788
│ │ │
*3868-PS │Affidavit of Rudolf Franz Ferdinand │ │
│Hoess, 5 April 1946, concerning │ │
│execution of 3,000,000 people at │ │
│Auschwitz Extermination Center. (USA │ │
│819) │ VI │ 787
│ │ │
*3870-PS │Affidavit of Hans Marsalek, 8 April │ │
│1946, concerning Mauthausen │ │
│Concentration Camp and dying statement │ │
│of Franz Ziereis, the Commandant. (USA │ │
│797) │ VI │ 790
│ │ │
*D-84 │Gestapo instructions to State Police │ │
│Departments, 5 August 1937, regarding │ │
│protective custody for Bible students. │ │
│(USA 236) │ VI │ 1040
│ │ │
*D-569 │File of circulars from Reichsfuehrer SS,│ │
│the OKW, Inspector of Concentration │ │
│Camps, Chief of Security Police and SD, │ │
│dating from 29 October 1941 through 22 │ │
│February 1944, relative to procedure in │ │
│cases of unnatural death of Soviet PW, │ │
│execution of Soviet PW, etc. (GB 277) │ VII │ 74
│ │ │
*D-728 │Circular, 15 March 1945, from NSDAP │ │
│Gauleitung Hessen-Nassau to the │ │
│“Kreis”-Leaders of the Gau, concerning │ │
│Action by the Party to keep Germans in │ │
│check until end of the War. (GB 282) │ VII │ 174
│ │ │
*D-745-A │Deposition of Anton Kaindl, 8 March │ │
│1946, concerning SS personnel │ │
│supervising concentration camps. (USA │ │
│811) │ VII │ 208
│ │ │
*D-745-B │Deposition of Anton Kaindl, 19 March │ │
│1946, concerning SS personnel │ │
│supervising concentration camps. (USA │ │
│812) │ VII │ 209
│ │ │
*D-746-A │Deposition of Fritz Suhren, 8 March │ │
│1946, concerning SS personnel │ │
│supervising concentration camps. (USA │ │
│813) │ VII │ 209
│ │ │
*D-746-B │Deposition of Fritz Suhren, │ │
│19 March 1946, concerning SS personnel │ │
│supervising concentration camps. (USA │ │
│814) │ VII │ 210
│ │ │
*D-748 │Affidavit of Karl Totzauer, 15 March │ │
│1946, concerning SS personnel │ │
│supervising concentration camps. (USA │ │
│816) │ VII │ 211
│ │ │
*D-749-B │Statement of Rudolf Hoess, │ │
│20 March 1946, concerning SS personnel │ │
│supervising concentration camps. (USA │ │
│817) │ VII │ 212
│ │ │
*D-750 │Deposition of August Harbaum, │ │
│19 March 1946, concerning SS personnel │ │
│supervising concentration camps. (USA │ │
│818) │ VII │ 213
│ │ │
*L-83 │Affidavit of Gerhart H. Seger, 21 July │ │
│1945. (USA 234) │ VII │ 859
│ │ │
*L-215 │File of orders and dossiers of 25 │ │
│Luxembourgers committed to concentration│ │
│camps at various times in 1944. (USA │ │
│243) │ VII │ 1045
│ │ │
*R-91 │Telegram from Mueller, SS Gruppenfuehrer│ │
│to Reichsfuehrer SS, 16 December 1942. │ │
│(USA 241) │ VIII │ 60
│ │ │
*R-124 │Speer’s conference minutes of Central │ │
│Planning Board, 1942-44, concerning │ │
│labor supply. (USA 179) │ VIII │ 146
│ │ │
*R-129 │Letter and enclosure from Pohl to │ │
│Himmler, 30 April 1942, concerning │ │
│concentration camps. (USA 217) │ VIII │ 198